Orphan Works, 39341-39343 [05-13355]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202–
395–7316 (this is not a toll free number),
within 30 days from the date of this
publication in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration (ETA).
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Attestation by Employers Using
Crewmembers for Longshore Activities
at Locations in the State of Alaska.
OMB Number: 1205–0352.
Frequency: On occasion.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Type of Response: Recordkeeping.
Number of Respondents: 100.
Annual Responses: 100.
Average Response Time: 3 hours.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 300.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup
Costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (Operating/
Maintaining Systems or Purchasing
Services): $0.
Description: The information
provided on this form by employers
seeking to use alien crewmembers to
perform longshore activities in the State
of Alaska will permit the Department to
meet Federal responsibilities for
program administration, management
and oversight.
Ira L. Mills,
Departmental Clearance Officer/Team
Leader.
[FR Doc. 05–13321 Filed 7–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
Orphan Works
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress
ACTION: Notice of public roundtables.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office
announces public roundtable
discussions regarding ‘‘orphan works,’’
i.e., copyrighted works whose owners
are difficult or even impossible to
identify or locate. The Office seeks to
address whether there are compelling
concerns that merit a legislative,
regulatory or other solution, and what
type of solution could effectively
address these concerns without
conflicting with the legitimate interests
of authors and right holders. The Office
solicited and received written
comments on these issues pursuant to a
Notice of Inquiry issued earlier this
year. See Notice of Inquiry, 70 FR 3739
(Jan. 26, 2005). The Office will now
hold roundtable discussions to further
address the issues raised and solutions
proposed in the written comments.
DATES: The public roundtable will first
be held in Washington, D.C. on
Tuesday, July 26, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. E.D.T., and on Wednesday,
July 27, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. E.D.T. An additional roundtable
will be held in Berkeley, California on
Tuesday, August 2, 2005, from 9:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. P.D.T. Requests to
participate in the roundtables must be
received by the Copyright Office by 5:00
p.m. E.D.T. on July 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The roundtable in
Washington, D.C. will be held in the
Russell Senate Office Building, Room
188, Washington, D.C. 20510, on July
26, 2005, and in the Rayburn House
Office Building, Room 2237,
Washington, D.C., 20515, on July 27,
2005. The public roundtable in
Berkeley, California will be held at the
Boalt Hall School of Law, University of
California – Berkeley, Berkeley,
California 94720. Details on the precise
location in Berkeley, California will be
provided in advance of the meeting on
the Copyright Office website, https://
www.copyright.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Oliver Metzger, Attorney–Advisor,
Office of Policy & International Affairs,
Email: omet@loc.gov; Telephone (202)
707–8350; Fax (202) 707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Procedure for Submitting Requests to
Participate
The roundtable discussions will be
open to the public. However, persons
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39341
wishing to participate in the discussions
must submit a written request to the
Copyright Office. The request to
participate must include the following
information: (1) the name of the person
desiring to participate; (2) the
organization(s) represented by that
person, if any; (3) contact information
(address, telephone, telefax, and e–
mail); and (4) a one–page summary of
the specific issues the participant (or his
or her organization) wishes to address.
The one–page summary must also
identify in which of the four general
roundtable topic areas the person would
most like to participate in order of
preference, along with the
corresponding date, time and location
(see below for detail). Space and time
constraints may require us to limit
participation in one or more of the topic
areas, and there is a chance that not all
requests to participate will be granted.
Identification of the desired topic areas
in order of preference will help the
Office to ensure that participants will be
heard in the area(s) of interest most
critical to them. In addition, any person
requesting participation in the
roundtable who did not file a written
initial or reply comment in response to
the Notice of Inquiry published on
January 26, 2005, 70 FR 3739 (January
26, 2005), must provide his or her
statement of interest in this proceeding
in his or her one–page summary. The
Office will notify each participant in
advance of his or her designated topic
area(s), and the corresponding time(s)
and location(s).
Note also for those who wish to attend
but not participate in the roundtables
that space is limited. Seats will be
available on a first–come, first–served
basis. However, all discussions will be
transcribed, and transcripts
subsequently made available on the
Copyright Office website.
Requests to participate may be
submitted to the Office by e–mail
(preferred), by commercial courier, or by
hand delivery by a private party
(submission by overnight service or
regular mail will not be effective) as
follows:
1. If by e–mail (preferred): Send to
orphanworks@loc.gov a message
containing the information required
above. The one–page summary of issues
may be included in the text of the
message, or may be sent as a MIME
attachment. If sent as a MIME
attachment, the summary must be in a
single file in either: (1) Adobe Portable
Document File (PDF) format; (2)
Microsoft Word 2000 or earlier; (3)
WordPerfect 9.0 or earlier; (4) Rich Text
File (RTF) format; or (5) ASCII text file
format.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
39342
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
2. If by commercial, non–government
courier or messenger: Address to Jule L.
Sigall, Associate Register for Policy &
International Affairs, U.S. Copyright
Office, Room LM–403, James Madison
Memorial Building, 101 Independence
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20559–
6000, and deliver to the Congressional
Courier Acceptance Site (CCAS), 2nd
and D Streets, NE, Washington, DC
between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., a cover
letter with the information required
above, and include three copies of the
one–page summary of issues. (Note: the
Copyright Office will consider the date
of receipt at CCAS as the date of receipt
in the Copyright Office.)
3. If by hand delivery by a private
party: Address to Jule L. Sigall,
Associate Register for Policy &
International Affairs, U.S. Copyright
Office, James Madison Memorial
Building, Room LM–401, 101
Independence Avenue, SE, Washington,
DC 20559–6000, and deliver to Room
LM–401 of the James Madison Memorial
Building, a cover letter with the
information required above, and include
three copies of the one–page summary
of issues.
Background
On January 26, 2005, the Copyright
Office published a Notice of Inquiry in
the Federal Register, 70 FR 3739 (Jan.
26, 2005), announcing its study of issues
surrounding ‘‘orphan works,’’ i.e.,
copyrighted works whose owners are
difficult or even impossible to identify
or locate. The study is a response to
concerns that difficulty in identifying
and/or locating copyright owners can
create difficulties in obtaining
permission for subsequent creators and
users to use works in socially
productive ways, such as by
incorporating these works in new
creative efforts, or by making them
available to the public. Specifically the
Office seeks to address whether the
problems identified in the comments
merit a solution, and what type of
solution could effectively address these
problems without conflicting with the
legitimate interests of authors and right
holders.
The original Notice of Inquiry invited
the public to submit written comments.
Initial Comments were first submitted to
the Office during a 60–day period
following issuance of the Notice of
Inquiry. Reply Comments were then
submitted during an additional 45–day
period. The Office received
approximately 850 unique comments
during these periods, all of which have
been posted on the Copyright Office
website (https://www.copyright.gov/
orphan).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
The Copyright Office has reviewed
the Initial and Reply Comments and
seeks further information and
discussion on several issues raised by
the Notice and this study. To help guide
the discussion, the following
Provisional Agenda will be followed in
both the Washington, DC and Berkeley,
CA roundtables:
Topic 1: Identification of Orphan Works
Washington, DC: Tuesday, July 26,
morning session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2,
morning session
The Notice of Inquiry invited
comments on how the term ‘‘orphan
work’’ should be defined, or how
orphan works might be designated. It
suggested two general approaches: (1)
an ‘‘ad hoc’’ or case–by–case approach,
setting forth basic parameters of what
might constitute a sufficient search
under the circumstances; and (2) a
formal approach incorporating a registry
or registries in various forms and with
various effects. The Notice of Inquiry
also invited comment on other
threshold issues, such as whether
certain works should be categorically
excluded from designation as ‘‘orphan
works’’ because of age, publication
status, etc. While many comments
addressed these issues in detail, the
Copyright Office seeks further
discussion on the following issues
within this general area of concern:
a. The ‘‘due diligence’’/‘‘reasonable
efforts’’ search approach and standard.
b. The role of registries of copyright
ownership information and/or uses of
purported orphan works.
c. Inclusion or exclusion of
unpublished works.
d. Other threshold requirements, such
as age of works, types of works, types
of users, types of uses.
Topic 2: Consequences of an ‘‘Orphan
Works’’ Designation
Washington, DC: Tuesday, July 26,
afternoon session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2,
afternoon session
Assuming that a work is identified or
designated as an orphan work, a wide
range of legal consequences may
potentially result. The Notice of Inquiry
summarized some of these
consequences, while others were
suggested and addressed in the written
comments. These consequences vary in
nature and degree, from limitations on
the remedies available to a reappearing
owner, to the payment of a mandatory
fee by the user in a variety of forms, to
a statutory exemption explicitly
authorizing various uses, to termination
of all rights in the work through entry
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
into the public domain. The Copyright
Office seeks further information on the
following issues within this topic area:
a. The ‘‘limitations on remedies’’
approach.
b. The exemption and public domain
approaches.
c. Payment of fees or escrow by the
user.
d. Other conditions/obligations on the
user (e.g. time limits, notice,
registration).
e. Reliance (or ‘‘piggybacking’’) on
previous searches by subsequent users.
Topic 3: Reclaiming Orphan Works
Washington, DC: Wednesday, July 27,
morning session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2,
afternoon session
Once a work has been designated an
orphan work, resulting in any of a
number of potential legal consequences,
a formerly unidentified or missing
copyright owner may reappear and
attempt to assert rights in the work. This
assertion of rights might occur during
any number of stages in the process of
exploiting of the work, and after a user
may have incurred costs in reliance on
the continuing unavailability of the
original owner. The assertion of rights
may also occur in a variety of forms,
from informal communication between
the original owner and user, to formal
litigation over rights in the work. The
Copyright Office seeks further
discussion of the following issues
within this topic area:
a. The consequences of owner
reappearance for uses in the process of
being prepared for exploitation (whether
derivative uses or other uses in
preparation), and for ongoing
exploitations.
b. The burden of proof in litigation,
on issues such as the reasonableness of
a user’s search.
c. Statutory damages and attorneys
fees.
d. Rights in derivative works based on
an orphan work.
Topic 4: International Issues
Washington, DC: Wednesday, July 27,
afternoon session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2,
afternoon session
The Notice of Inquiry specifically
asked how any proposed solution to
orphan works problems might be
reconciled with existing international
obligations regarding copyright. These
obligations include the prohibition
against formalities in the Berne
Convention, as well as limitations on
the nature of exceptions imposed by the
TRIPS Agreement. Several comments
addressed these questions specifically,
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2005 / Notices
but also raised other concerns when the
international dimensions of orphan
works problems are considered. The
Copyright Office seeks further
information on the following issues
within this topic area:
a. Compliance of various alternatives
with the Berne Convention prohibition
against formalities.
b. Compliance of various alternatives
with TRIPS/Berne ‘‘three–step’’ test for
limitations or exceptions.
c. Exclusion of foreign works from the
orphan work definition.
d. Gathering information on
experience in other countries with
orphan works issues.
The roundtable might also take up
other issues not encompassed by the
above agenda if time permits.
Dated: June 30, 2005
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 05–13355 Filed 7–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
[Docket No. RM 2005–7]
Satellite Home Viewer Extension and
Reauthorization Act of 2004
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the
Library of Congress is requesting
information for the preparation of the
first report to the Congress required by
the Satellite Home Viewer Extension
and Reauthorization Act of 2004.
DATES: Comments are due no later than
August 22, 2005. Reply comments are
due no later than September 12, 2005.
ADDRESSES: If hand delivered by a
private party, an original and five copies
of a comment should be brought to
Room LM–401 of the James Madison
Memorial Building between 8:30 a.m.
and 5 p.m. and the envelope should be
addressed as follows: Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office,
James Madison Memorial Building,
Room LM–401, 101 Independence
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20559–
6000. If delivered by a commercial
courier, an original and five copies of a
comment must be delivered to the
Congressional Courier Acceptance Site
located at 2nd and D Streets, NE,
between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The
envelope should be addressed as
follows: Office of the General Counsel,
Room LM–403, James Madison
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:31 Jul 06, 2005
Jkt 205001
Memorial Building, 101 Independence
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC. If sent by
mail (including overnight delivery using
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail), an
original and five copies of a comment
should be addressed to U.S. Copyright
Office, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box
70400, Southwest Station, Washington,
DC 20024. Comments may not be
delivered by means of overnight
delivery services such as Federal
Express, United Parcel Service, etc., due
to delays in processing receipt of such
deliveries.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Sandros, Associate General
Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box
70400, Southwest Station, Washington,
DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8380.
Telefax: (202) 707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 8, 2004, the President signed
the Satellite Home Viewer Extension
and Reauthorization Act of 2004
(‘‘SHVERA’’), a part of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2005. Pub. L. No.
108–447. SHVERA extends for an
additional five years the statutory
license for satellite carriers
retransmitting over–the–air television
broadcast stations to their subscribers,
as well as making a number of
amendments to the existing section 119
of the Copyright Act. In addition to the
extension and the amendments,
SHVERA directs the Copyright Office to
conduct two studies and report its
findings to the Committee on the
Judiciary of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on
the Judiciary of the Senate. One study,
due by June 30, 2008, requires the
Copyright Office to examine and
compare the statutory licensing systems
for the cable and satellite industries
under sections 111, 119 and 122 of the
Copyright Act and recommend any
necessary legislative changes. The other
study, due by December 31, 2005,
requires the Office to examine select
portions of the section 119 license and
to determine what, if any, impact
sections 119 and 122 have had on
copyright owners whose programming
is retransmitted by satellite carriers.
That study is the subject of this Notice
of Inquiry.
The SHVERA Study
Section 110 of SHVERA provides:
No later than December 31, 2005, the Register
of Copyrights shall report to the
Committee on the Judiciary of the House
of Representatives and the Committee on
the Judiciary of the Senate the Register’s
findings and recommendations on the
following:
(1) The extent to which the unserved
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39343
household limitation for network
stations contained in section 119 of title
17, United States Code, has operated
efficiently and effectively and has
forwarded the goal of title 17, United
States Code, to protect copyright owners
of over–the–air television programming,
including what amendments, if any, are
necessary to effectively identify the
application of the limitation to
individual households to receive
secondary transmissions of primary
digital transmissions of network stations.
(2) The extent to which secondary
transmissions of primary transmissions
of network stations and superstations
under section 119 of title 17, United
States Code, harm copyright owners of
broadcast programming throughout the
United States and the effect, if any, of the
statutory license under section 122 of
title 17, United States Code, in reducing
such harm.
Pub. L. No. 108–447, 118 Stat. 3394,
3408 (2004).
Part One: The Unserved Household
Limitation
The statutory license set forth in
section 119 of the Copyright Act enables
satellite carriers to retransmit distant
over–the–air television broadcast
stations to their subscribers.1The license
has a significant restriction, however,
with respect to the retransmission of
network television stations. Satellite
carriers may only retransmit distant
network stations to subscribers who
reside in ‘‘unserved households.’’ An
‘‘unserved household,’’ with respect to
a particular television network, is
defined in the law as:
[A] household that–
(A) cannot receive, through the use of a
conventional, stationary, outdoor rooftop
receiving antenna, an over–the–air signal
of a primary network station affiliated
with that network of Grade B intensity as
defined by the Federal Communications
Commission under section 73.683(a) of
title 47 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as in effect on January 1,
1999;
(B) is subject to a waiver that meets the
standards of subsection (a)(14) whether
or not the waiver was granted before the
date of the enactment of the Satellite
Home Viewer Extension and
Reauthorization Act of 2004;
(C) is a subscriber to whom subsection (e)
applies;
(D) is a subscriber to whom subsection (a)(12)
applies; or
(E) is a subscriber to whom the exemption
under subsection (a)(2)(B)(iii) applies.
17 U.S.C. 119(d)(10).
1 Section 122 of the Copyright Act permits
satellite carriers to retransmit local over-the-air
television broadcast stations to their subscribers.
See 17 U.S.C. 122.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39341-39343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13355]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
Orphan Works
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress
ACTION: Notice of public roundtables.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office announces public roundtable discussions
regarding ``orphan works,'' i.e., copyrighted works whose owners are
difficult or even impossible to identify or locate. The Office seeks to
address whether there are compelling concerns that merit a legislative,
regulatory or other solution, and what type of solution could
effectively address these concerns without conflicting with the
legitimate interests of authors and right holders. The Office solicited
and received written comments on these issues pursuant to a Notice of
Inquiry issued earlier this year. See Notice of Inquiry, 70 FR 3739
(Jan. 26, 2005). The Office will now hold roundtable discussions to
further address the issues raised and solutions proposed in the written
comments.
DATES: The public roundtable will first be held in Washington, D.C. on
Tuesday, July 26, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. E.D.T., and on
Wednesday, July 27, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. E.D.T. An
additional roundtable will be held in Berkeley, California on Tuesday,
August 2, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. P.D.T. Requests to
participate in the roundtables must be received by the Copyright Office
by 5:00 p.m. E.D.T. on July 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: The roundtable in Washington, D.C. will be held in the
Russell Senate Office Building, Room 188, Washington, D.C. 20510, on
July 26, 2005, and in the Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2237,
Washington, D.C., 20515, on July 27, 2005. The public roundtable in
Berkeley, California will be held at the Boalt Hall School of Law,
University of California - Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720.
Details on the precise location in Berkeley, California will be
provided in advance of the meeting on the Copyright Office website,
https://www.copyright.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Oliver Metzger, Attorney-Advisor,
Office of Policy & International Affairs, Email: omet@loc.gov;
Telephone (202) 707-8350; Fax (202) 707-8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Procedure for Submitting Requests to Participate
The roundtable discussions will be open to the public. However,
persons wishing to participate in the discussions must submit a written
request to the Copyright Office. The request to participate must
include the following information: (1) the name of the person desiring
to participate; (2) the organization(s) represented by that person, if
any; (3) contact information (address, telephone, telefax, and e-mail);
and (4) a one-page summary of the specific issues the participant (or
his or her organization) wishes to address.
The one-page summary must also identify in which of the four
general roundtable topic areas the person would most like to
participate in order of preference, along with the corresponding date,
time and location (see below for detail). Space and time constraints
may require us to limit participation in one or more of the topic
areas, and there is a chance that not all requests to participate will
be granted. Identification of the desired topic areas in order of
preference will help the Office to ensure that participants will be
heard in the area(s) of interest most critical to them. In addition,
any person requesting participation in the roundtable who did not file
a written initial or reply comment in response to the Notice of Inquiry
published on January 26, 2005, 70 FR 3739 (January 26, 2005), must
provide his or her statement of interest in this proceeding in his or
her one-page summary. The Office will notify each participant in
advance of his or her designated topic area(s), and the corresponding
time(s) and location(s).
Note also for those who wish to attend but not participate in the
roundtables that space is limited. Seats will be available on a first-
come, first-served basis. However, all discussions will be transcribed,
and transcripts subsequently made available on the Copyright Office
website.
Requests to participate may be submitted to the Office by e-mail
(preferred), by commercial courier, or by hand delivery by a private
party (submission by overnight service or regular mail will not be
effective) as follows:
1. If by e-mail (preferred): Send to orphanworks@loc.gov a message
containing the information required above. The one-page summary of
issues may be included in the text of the message, or may be sent as a
MIME attachment. If sent as a MIME attachment, the summary must be in a
single file in either: (1) Adobe Portable Document File (PDF) format;
(2) Microsoft Word 2000 or earlier; (3) WordPerfect 9.0 or earlier; (4)
Rich Text File (RTF) format; or (5) ASCII text file format.
[[Page 39342]]
2. If by commercial, non-government courier or messenger: Address
to Jule L. Sigall, Associate Register for Policy & International
Affairs, U.S. Copyright Office, Room LM-403, James Madison Memorial
Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20559-6000, and
deliver to the Congressional Courier Acceptance Site (CCAS), 2nd and D
Streets, NE, Washington, DC between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., a cover
letter with the information required above, and include three copies of
the one-page summary of issues. (Note: the Copyright Office will
consider the date of receipt at CCAS as the date of receipt in the
Copyright Office.)
3. If by hand delivery by a private party: Address to Jule L.
Sigall, Associate Register for Policy & International Affairs, U.S.
Copyright Office, James Madison Memorial Building, Room LM-401, 101
Independence Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20559-6000, and deliver to Room
LM-401 of the James Madison Memorial Building, a cover letter with the
information required above, and include three copies of the one-page
summary of issues.
Background
On January 26, 2005, the Copyright Office published a Notice of
Inquiry in the Federal Register, 70 FR 3739 (Jan. 26, 2005), announcing
its study of issues surrounding ``orphan works,'' i.e., copyrighted
works whose owners are difficult or even impossible to identify or
locate. The study is a response to concerns that difficulty in
identifying and/or locating copyright owners can create difficulties in
obtaining permission for subsequent creators and users to use works in
socially productive ways, such as by incorporating these works in new
creative efforts, or by making them available to the public.
Specifically the Office seeks to address whether the problems
identified in the comments merit a solution, and what type of solution
could effectively address these problems without conflicting with the
legitimate interests of authors and right holders.
The original Notice of Inquiry invited the public to submit written
comments. Initial Comments were first submitted to the Office during a
60-day period following issuance of the Notice of Inquiry. Reply
Comments were then submitted during an additional 45-day period. The
Office received approximately 850 unique comments during these periods,
all of which have been posted on the Copyright Office website (https://
www.copyright.gov/orphan).
The Copyright Office has reviewed the Initial and Reply Comments
and seeks further information and discussion on several issues raised
by the Notice and this study. To help guide the discussion, the
following Provisional Agenda will be followed in both the Washington,
DC and Berkeley, CA roundtables:
Topic 1: Identification of Orphan Works
Washington, DC: Tuesday, July 26, morning session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2, morning session
The Notice of Inquiry invited comments on how the term ``orphan
work'' should be defined, or how orphan works might be designated. It
suggested two general approaches: (1) an ``ad hoc'' or case-by-case
approach, setting forth basic parameters of what might constitute a
sufficient search under the circumstances; and (2) a formal approach
incorporating a registry or registries in various forms and with
various effects. The Notice of Inquiry also invited comment on other
threshold issues, such as whether certain works should be categorically
excluded from designation as ``orphan works'' because of age,
publication status, etc. While many comments addressed these issues in
detail, the Copyright Office seeks further discussion on the following
issues within this general area of concern:
a. The ``due diligence''/``reasonable efforts'' search approach and
standard.
b. The role of registries of copyright ownership information and/or
uses of purported orphan works.
c. Inclusion or exclusion of unpublished works.
d. Other threshold requirements, such as age of works, types of
works, types of users, types of uses.
Topic 2: Consequences of an ``Orphan Works'' Designation
Washington, DC: Tuesday, July 26, afternoon session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2, afternoon session
Assuming that a work is identified or designated as an orphan work,
a wide range of legal consequences may potentially result. The Notice
of Inquiry summarized some of these consequences, while others were
suggested and addressed in the written comments. These consequences
vary in nature and degree, from limitations on the remedies available
to a reappearing owner, to the payment of a mandatory fee by the user
in a variety of forms, to a statutory exemption explicitly authorizing
various uses, to termination of all rights in the work through entry
into the public domain. The Copyright Office seeks further information
on the following issues within this topic area:
a. The ``limitations on remedies'' approach.
b. The exemption and public domain approaches.
c. Payment of fees or escrow by the user.
d. Other conditions/obligations on the user (e.g. time limits,
notice, registration).
e. Reliance (or ``piggybacking'') on previous searches by
subsequent users.
Topic 3: Reclaiming Orphan Works
Washington, DC: Wednesday, July 27, morning session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2, afternoon session
Once a work has been designated an orphan work, resulting in any of
a number of potential legal consequences, a formerly unidentified or
missing copyright owner may reappear and attempt to assert rights in
the work. This assertion of rights might occur during any number of
stages in the process of exploiting of the work, and after a user may
have incurred costs in reliance on the continuing unavailability of the
original owner. The assertion of rights may also occur in a variety of
forms, from informal communication between the original owner and user,
to formal litigation over rights in the work. The Copyright Office
seeks further discussion of the following issues within this topic
area:
a. The consequences of owner reappearance for uses in the process
of being prepared for exploitation (whether derivative uses or other
uses in preparation), and for ongoing exploitations.
b. The burden of proof in litigation, on issues such as the
reasonableness of a user's search.
c. Statutory damages and attorneys fees.
d. Rights in derivative works based on an orphan work.
Topic 4: International Issues
Washington, DC: Wednesday, July 27, afternoon session
Berkeley, CA: Tuesday, August 2, afternoon session
The Notice of Inquiry specifically asked how any proposed solution
to orphan works problems might be reconciled with existing
international obligations regarding copyright. These obligations
include the prohibition against formalities in the Berne Convention, as
well as limitations on the nature of exceptions imposed by the TRIPS
Agreement. Several comments addressed these questions specifically,
[[Page 39343]]
but also raised other concerns when the international dimensions of
orphan works problems are considered. The Copyright Office seeks
further information on the following issues within this topic area:
a. Compliance of various alternatives with the Berne Convention
prohibition against formalities.
b. Compliance of various alternatives with TRIPS/Berne ``three-
step'' test for limitations or exceptions.
c. Exclusion of foreign works from the orphan work definition.
d. Gathering information on experience in other countries with
orphan works issues.
The roundtable might also take up other issues not encompassed by
the above agenda if time permits.
Dated: June 30, 2005
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 05-13355 Filed 7-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-S