Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, Children's Bureau, 38957-38967 [05-13303]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
Federal funds for the proposed project;
or the potential for high benefit from
low Federal investment. ACYF may
elect not to fund any applicants having
known management, fiscal, reporting,
programmatic, or other problems which
make it unlikely that they would be able
to provide effective services or
effectively complete the proposed
activity.
With the results of the peer review
and the information from Federal staff,
the Commissioner of ACYF makes the
final funding decisions. The
Commissioner may give special
consideration to applications proposing
services of special interest to the
Government and to achieve geographic
distributions of grant awards.
Applications of special interest may
include, but are not limited to,
applications focusing on unserved or
inadequately served clients or service
areas and programs addressing diverse
ethnic populations.
Approved but Unfunded Applications
Applications that are approved but
unfunded may be held over for funding
in the next funding cycle, pending the
availability of funds, for a period not to
exceed one year.
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Applications will be reviewed in the
summer of 2005. Grant awards will have
a start date no later than September 30,
2005.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The successful applicants will be
notified through the issuance of a
Financial Assistance Award document
which sets forth the amount of funds
granted, the terms and conditions of the
grant, the effective date of the grant, the
budget period for which initial support
will be given, the non-Federal share to
be provided, and the total project period
for which support is contemplated. The
Financial Assistance Award will be
signed by the Grants Officer and
transmitted via postal mail.
Organizations whose applications will
not be funded will be notified in
writing.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Direct Federal grants, sub-award
funds, or contracts under this program
shall not be used to support inherently
religious activities such as religious
instruction, worship, or proselytization.
Therefore, organizations must take steps
to separate, in time or location, their
inherently religious activities from the
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:28 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
38957
services funded under this Program.
Regulations pertaining to the Equal
Treatment for Faith-based
Organizations, which includes the
prohibition against Federal funding of
inherently religious activities, can be
found at either 45 CFR 87.1 or the HHS
Web site at https://www.os.dhhs.gov/
fbci/waisgate21.pdf.
45 CFR Part 74; 92. Grantees are
subject to the requirements in 45 CFR
part 74 (non-governmental) or 45 CFR
part 92 (governmental) organizations.
Dated: June 28, 2005.
Joan E. Ohl,
Commissioner, Administration on Children,
Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. 05–13302 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
3. Reporting Requirements
Program Progress Reports: SemiAnnually.
Financial Reports: Semi-Annually.
Grantees will be required to submit
program progress reports and financial
reports (SF269) throughout the project
period. Program progress and financial
reports are due 30 days after the
reporting period. In addition, final
programmatic and financial reports are
due 90 days after the close of the project
period.
Administration on Children, Youth, and
Families, Children’s Bureau
VII. Agency Contacts
Program Office Contact: Patsy Buida,
Children’s Bureau, 330 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20447, Phone: 202–
205–8769, E-mail: pbuida@acf.hhs.gov.
Grants Management Office Contact:
Peter Thompson, Grants Officer,
Administration for Children and
Families, Children’s Bureau, 330 C
Street, SW., Room 2070, Washington,
DC 20447, Phone: 202–401–4608, Email: pathompson@acf.hhs.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: Beginning with FY 2006, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) will no longer publish
grant announcements in the Federal
Register. Beginning October 1, 2005
applicants will be able to find a
synopsis of all ACF grant opportunities
and apply electronically for
opportunities via: https://
www.Grants.gov. Applicants will also be
able to find the complete text of all ACF
grant announcements on the ACF Web
site located at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
grants/.
Additional information about this
program and its purpose can be located
on the following Web sites: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/.
For general questions regarding this
announcement please contact: ACYF
Operations Center, The Dixon Group
ATTN: Children’s Bureau, 118 Q Street,
NE., Washington DC 20002–2132,
Telephone: 866–796–1591.
Applicants will not be sent
acknowledgements of received
applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Funding Opportunity Title: National
Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect.
Announcement Type: Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2005–ACF–ACYF–CA–0086.
CFDA Number: 93.670.
Due Date for Applications:
Applications are due August 10, 2005.
Category of Funding Activity: Social
Security and Income Services.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this funding
announcement is to award a cooperative
agreement to continue the operation of
the national data archive on child abuse
and neglect, and to continue the
processing and housing of high quality
data sets and related activities that
facilitate the use of archived data.
In year 1, the grantee will provide
supplementary support to data users
who access National Survey of Child
and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW)
data through the National Data Archive
on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Priority Area 1
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The purpose of this funding
announcement is to award a cooperative
agreement to continue the operation of
the national data archive on child abuse
and neglect, and to continue the
processing and housing of high quality
data sets and related activities that
facilitate the use of archived data.
In year 1, the grantee will provide
supplementary support to data users
who access National Survey of Child
and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW)
data through the National Data Archive
on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Background
The purpose of this funding
announcement is to award a cooperative
agreement to continue the operation of
the national data archive on child abuse
and neglect and to continue the
processing and housing of high quality
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
38958
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
data sets and related activities that
facilitate the use of archived data.
In year 1, the grantee will provide
supplementary support to data users
who access National Survey of Child
and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW)
data through the National Data Archive
on Child Abuse and Neglect.
In this funding announcement, ACYF
seeks to ensure funding for one of the
components of a research structure
identified as critical in the report of the
Panel on Research on Child Abuse and
Neglect of the National Research
Council. The Archive is needed to make
available and support research on the
prevention, identification and treatment
of child abuse and neglect, adoption,
foster care, and related child welfare
issues. Since September 30, 1988, the
National Center on Child Abuse and
Neglect (NCCAN), and now the
Children’s Bureau (CB), has provided
funding for the National Data Archive
on Child Abuse and Neglect. The
Archive is currently located at Cornell
University, Family Life Development
Center, MVR Hall, Ithaca, New York,
14853–4401 (telephone 607–255–7799).
The Archive is a centralized facility for
the acquisition, preservation, and
dissemination of machine-readable data
sets relevant to the study of child
maltreatment and child welfare. The
Archive currently holds 24 data sets and
has produced an updated document that
has been widely disseminated to the
field: ‘Depositing Data with the National
Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect: A
Handbook for Investigators.’ Information
on the data sets can be obtained from
the Archive. The Handbook can be
obtained from the Archive directly or
downloaded through its Web page,
https://www.ndacan.cornell.edu/, or
through the National Clearinghouse on
Child Abuse and Neglect Information.
This is a full and open competition.
It is expected that the successful
applicant, whether the current grantee
or a new grantee, will continue to build
on the present activities and negotiate
transition of the project in a professional
manner, respectful of the proprietary
nature of some of the material housed at
and created by the current grantee, as
necessary.
The Archive is responsible for a
variety of activities: To prepare, process,
house and preserve quality data sets; to
establish standards and procedures for
documentation and produce related
materials; to facilitate collaboration
through training, technical assistance,
workshops featuring specific data sets
(including the National Survey of Child
and Adolescent Well-Being), and
summer institutes; to create and utilize
an advisory board of some kind; and
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
dissemination through a variety of
outreach methods. Applicants are
encouraged to consider this list of
activities as minimal requirements.
While a major function of the Archive
is to process, house, and preserve
quality data sets from studies on child
abuse and neglect, an archive also plays
a critical role in setting standards and
establishing good practices for
documentation of data sets. Establishing
such procedures enables data to be more
readily available and easily shared with
other researchers and provides the
additional capacity for further and
secondary analysis.
Any child welfare investigator,
regardless of the funding source, is
welcome to house data with the
Archive. Since FY 1994, all research
grantees funded by the National Center
on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN),
and now all those funded by the
Children’s Bureau, have been required,
as a condition of their award, to archive
their data. They must prepare data sets
according to sound data processing and
documentation practices and to house
those data sets at the Archive within
two years of the end of their funding
period. Archive staff provide technical
support on data entry, processing,
analysis, and documentation. Thus, the
application submitted in response to
this priority area should be responsive
to housing data sets from a variety of
sources, including but not limited to
national surveys such as those
conducted by the National Center for
Health Statistics, the National Incidence
Studies, the National Child Abuse and
Neglect Data System (NCANDS), and the
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System (AFCARS), and the
National Survey of Child and
Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW).
A centralized archive can facilitate
collaboration among researchers for
knowledge building and encourage new
researchers to enter the field. An archive
should also provide training and
technical assistance opportunities for
new researchers or postdoctoral
candidates by conducting training
institutes that convene a small number
of researchers to work in a guided
setting with these data sets. Support for
secondary analysis of various data sets
in the Archive can be provided through
these training institutes as well as
through small grants to researchers to
work with these data sets. Support may
be provided for graduate research or
postdoctoral research fellows to work in
residence with Archive staff on research
related to the holdings. Workshops and
training sessions can also be convened
at major national conferences.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
There is an increasing recognition that
some data sets cannot be archived in
their entirety for public use without
undue risk to the study respondents.
Researchers are understandably
concerned about the possibility of
breaches of confidentiality, and the
intentional and unintentional
unmasking of identifying information in
these sensitive data sets. In order to
protect participants’ identities in a
public use data set, researchers often
must delete or mask important variables
in the data set, which limits the utility
of the data for secondary analyses. One
solution has been to provide access to
the more detailed data on a restricted
basis, by obtaining assurances from the
user that the data sets will be carefully
handled and will be used only for
legitimate research purposes. For
example, the National Center for
Educational Statistics has developed
licensing and monitoring procedures
that allow for the release of micro-data
that otherwise would not be available to
the broader research community. The
Archive should anticipate the need for
maintaining similar licensing and
monitoring procedures for similarly
sensitive data sets, including the data
from the National Survey of Child and
Adolescent Well-Being.
Dissemination is a major function of
an archive. This includes providing
innovative tools such as CD–ROMs and
a range of ready-to-use formats that
make archived data sets more easily
accessible to the research community;
answering AFCARS data requests from
the public and referring these requests
to the Children’s Bureau as needed,
publishing information on projects of
the Archive and new acquisitions;
preparation of technical guidelines
outlining data processing standards and
user guides to archive holdings; and the
development and maintenance of
electronic mail services to facilitate
networking and information exchange
among researchers in the field of child
abuse and neglect, including their
access to a database on measures
appropriate for researchers in this field.
Cooperation and appropriate
collaboration with other archives also is
expected.
Legislative Authority
The Child Abuse Prevention and
Treatment Act Section 105(b)(5) (42
U.S.C. 5106) Section 429 of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunities
Reconciliation Act (Pub. L. 104–193).
Projects funded under this
announcement will be expected to:
1. Have the project fully functioning
within 90 days following the
notification of the grant award.
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
2. Participate if the Children’s Bureau
chooses to do a national evaluation or
a technical assistance contract that
relates to this funding announcement.
3. Submit all performance indicator
data, program and financial reports in a
timely manner, in recommended format
(to be provided), and submit the final
report on disk or electronically using a
standard word-processing program.
4. Submit a copy of the final report,
the evaluation report, and any program
products to the National Clearinghouse
on Child Abuse and Neglect
Information, 330 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20447, within 90 days
of project end date. This is in addition
to the standard requirement that the
final program and evaluation report
must also be submitted to the Grants
Management Specialist and the Federal
Project Officer.
5. Allocate sufficient funds in the
budget to:
(a) Provide for the project director, the
evaluator and a child welfare
representative to attend an annual 3-day
grantees’ meeting in Washington, DC.
(b) Provide for the project director, the
evaluator and a child welfare
representative to attend an early kickoff
meeting for grantees funded under this
priority area to be held within the first
three months of the project (first year
only) in Washington, DC; and
(c) Provide for 10–15 percent of the
proposed budget to project evaluation.
II. Award Information
Funding Instrument Type:
Cooperative Agreement.
Federal Substantial Involvement With
Cooperative Agreement
A cooperative agreement is a specific
method of awarding Federal assistance
in which substantial Federal
involvement is anticipated. A
cooperative agreement clearly defines
the respective responsibilities of the
Children’s Bureau and the grantee prior
to the award. The Children’s Bureau
anticipates that agency involvement will
produce programmatic benefits to the
recipient otherwise unavailable to them
for carrying out the project. The
involvement and collaboration includes
Children’s Bureau review and approval
of planning stages of the activities
before implementation phases may
begin; Children’s Bureau involvement in
the establishment of policies and
procedures that maximize open
competition, and rigorous and impartial
development, review and funding of
grant or sub-grant activities, if
applicable; and Children’s Bureau and
recipient joint collaboration in the
performance of key programmatic
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
activities (i.e., strategic planning,
implementation, information technology
enhancements, training and technical
assistance, publications or products,
and evaluation). It also includes close
monitoring by the Children’s Bureau of
the requirements stated in this
announcement that limit the grantee’s
discretion with respect to scope of
services offered, organizational structure
and management processes, coupled
with close Children’s Bureau
monitoring during performance, which
may, in order to ensure compliance with
the intent of this funding, exceed those
federal stewardship responsibilities
customary for grant activities.
Anticipated Total Priority Area
Funding: $600,000.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 0 to
1.
Ceiling on Amount of Individual
Awards Per Budget Period: $600,000.
Average Projected Award Amount:
$600,000.
Length of Project Periods: 60-month
project with five 12-month budget
periods.
Other.
Explanation of Other: In the first
budget period, the maximum Federal
share of the project is not to exceed
$600,000. In subsequent budget periods,
the maximum Federal share of the
project is not to exceed $500,000. The
projects awarded will be for a project
period of 60 months. The initial grant
award will be for a 12-month budget
period. The award of continuation
beyond each 12-month budget period
will be subject to the availability of
funds, satisfactory progress on the part
of the grantee, and a determination that
continued funding would be in the best
interest of the government.
Floor on amount of individual
awards: None.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
State governments
County governments
City or township governments
Special district governments
Independent school districts
State controlled institutions of higher
education
Native American tribal governments
(Federally recognized)
Public Housing authorities/Indian
housing authorities
Native American tribal organizations
(other than Federally recognized tribal
governments)
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status
with the IRS, other than institutions
of higher education
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38959
Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3)
status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
Private institutions of higher education
Individuals
For-profit organization other than small
businesses
Small businesses
Additional Information on Eligibility
Faith-based and community
organizations that meet all other
eligibility requirements are eligible to
apply.
Applicant should have experience
with archiving and analyzing AFCARS
and NCANDS data, the two primary
databases utilized by the Children’s
Bureau.
Applicant should possess a sound
working knowledge of ACF data
collection activities related to the data
archive.
Collaborative and interdisciplinary
efforts are acceptable, but applications
should identify a primary applicant
responsible for administering the grant.
2. Cost Sharing/Matching
Cost Sharing/Matching: None.
3. Other Eligibility Information
All applicants must have a Dun &
Bradstreet number. On June 27, 2003 the
Office of Management and Budget
published in the Federal Register a new
Federal policy applicable to all Federal
grant applicants. The policy requires all
Federal grant applicants to provide a
Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number
when applying for Federal grants or
cooperative agreements on or after
October 1, 2003. The DUNS number will
be required whether an applicant is
submitting a paper application or using
the government-wide electronic portal
(https://www.Grants.gov). A DUNS
number will be required for every
application for a new award or renewal/
continuation of an award, including
applications or plans under formula,
entitlement and block grant programs,
submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization
has a DUNS number. You may acquire
a DUNS number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS number
request line on 1–866–705–5711 or you
may request a number on-line at
https://www.dnb.com.
Non-profit organizations applying for
funding are required to submit proof of
their non-profit status.
Proof of non-profit status is any one
of the following:
• A reference to the applicant
organization’s listing in the Internal
Revenue Service’s (IRS) most recent list
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
38960
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
of tax-exempt organizations described in
the IRS Code.
• A copy of a currently valid IRS tax
exemption certificate.
• A statement from a State taxing
body, State attorney general, or other
appropriate State official certifying that
the applicant organization has a nonprofit status and that none of the net
earning accrue to any private
shareholders or individuals.
• A certified copy of the
organization’s certificate of
incorporation or similar document that
clearly establishes non-profit status.
• Any of the items in the
subparagraphs immediately above for a
State or national parent organization
and a statement signed by the parent
organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit
affiliate.
Disqualification Factors
Applications that exceed the ceiling
amount will be considered nonresponsive and will not be considered
for funding under this announcement.
Any application post-marked after
4:30 p.m. eastern time zone on the
deadline date will not be considered for
competition.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package
ACYF Operations, The Dixon Group
ATTN: Children’s Bureau, 118 Q St.,
NE., Washington, DC 20002–2132,
Phone: 866–796–1591, URL: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/open/HHS–
2005–ACF–ACYF–CA–0001.html.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Originals, Copies and Signatures
If submitting your application in
paper format, an original and two copies
of the complete application are
required. The original and each of the
two copies must include all required
forms, certifications, assurances, and
appendices, be signed by an authorized
representative, have original signatures,
and be submitted unbound.
Each application must contain the
following items in the order listed:
Application for Federal Assistance
(Standard Form 424). Follow the
instructions below and those that
accompany the form.
In Item 5 of Form 424, put DUNS
number in ‘‘Organizational DUNS:’’ box.
In Item 5 of Form 424, include name,
phone number, and, if available, email
and fax numbers of the contact person.
In Item 8 of Form 424, check ‘New.’
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
In Item 10 of Form 424, clearly
identify the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) program title and
number for the program for which funds
are being requested as stated in this
funding opportunity announcement.
In Item 11 of Form 424, identify the
single funding opportunity the
application addresses.
In Item 12 of Form 424, identify the
specific geographic area to be served.
In Item 14 of Form 424, identify
Congressional districts of both the
applicant and project.
Budget Information Non-Construction
Programs (Form 424A) and Budget
Justification
Follow the instructions provided here
and those in Section V. Application
Review Information.
If applicable, applicants must include
a completed SPOC certification (Single
Point of Contact) with the date of the
SPOC contact entered in line 16, page 1
of the Form 424.
Proof of non-profit status (if
applicable). Please see Section III.3
Other Eligibility for ways to
demonstrate non-profit status.
Indirect cost rate agreement. If
claiming indirect costs, provide
documentation that applicant currently
has an indirect cost rate approved by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant
Federal agency.
Letters of agreement and memoranda
of understanding. If applicable, include
a letter of commitment or Memorandum
of Understanding from each partner
and/or sub-contractor describing their
role, detailing specific tasks to be
performed, and expressing commitment
to participate if the proposed project is
funded.
General Content and Form Information
The application limit is 75 pages total
including all forms and attachments.
Pages over this page limit will be
removed from the application and will
not be reviewed.
To be considered for funding, each
application must be submitted with the
Standard Federal Forms (provided at the
end of this announcement or through
the electronic links provided) and
following the guidance provided. The
application must be signed by an
individual authorized to act for the
applicant agency and to assume
responsibility for the obligations
imposed by the terms and conditions of
the grant award.
The application must be typed,
double spaced, printed on only one
side, with at least 1⁄2 inch margins on
each side and 1 inch at the top and
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
bottom, using standard 12 Point fonts
(such as Times New Roman or Courier).
Pages must be numbered.
All copies of an application must be
submitted in a single package, and a
separate package must be submitted for
each funding opportunity. The package
must be clearly labeled for the specific
funding opportunity it is addressing.
Because each application will be
duplicated, do not use or include
separate covers, binders, clips, tabs,
plastic inserts, maps, brochures, or any
other items that cannot be processed
easily on a photocopy machine with an
automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple,
or fasten in any way separate
subsections of the application,
including supporting documentation;
however, each complete copy must be
stapled securely in the upper left corner.
Applicants are advised that the copies
of the application submitted, not the
original, will be reproduced by the
Federal government for review.
Tips for Preparing a Competitive
Application. It is essential that
applicants read the entire
announcement package carefully before
preparing an application and include all
of the required application forms and
attachments. The application must
reflect a thorough understanding of the
purpose and objectives of the applicable
legislation. Reviewers expect applicants
to understand the goals of the legislation
and the Children’s Bureau’s interest in
each topic. A ‘‘responsive application’’
is one that addresses all of the
evaluation criteria in ways that
demonstrate this understanding.
Applications that are considered to be
‘‘unresponsive’’ generally receive very
low scores and are rarely funded.
The Children’s Bureau’s Web site
(https://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb)
provides a wide range of information
and links to other relevant Web sites.
Before you begin preparing an
application, we suggest that you learn
more about the mission and programs of
the Children’s Bureau by exploring the
Web site.
Organizing Your Application. The
specific evaluation criteria in Section V
of this funding announcement will be
used to review and evaluate each
application. The applicant should
address each of these specific evaluation
criteria in the project description.
Applicants should organize their project
description in this sequence: (1)
Objectives and Need for Assistance; (2)
Approach; (3) Organizational Profiles;
(4) Budget and Budget Justification; and
should use the same headings as these
criteria, so that reviewers can readily
find information that directly addresses
each of the specific review criteria.
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
Project Evaluation Plan. Project
evaluations are very important. If you
do not have the in-house capacity to
conduct an objective, comprehensive
evaluation of the project, then the
Children’s Bureau advises that you
propose contracting with a third-party
evaluator specializing in social science
or evaluation, or a university or college,
to conduct the evaluation. A skilled
evaluator can assist you in designing a
data collection strategy that is
appropriate for the evaluation of your
proposed project. Additional assistance
may be found in a document titled
‘‘Program Manager’s Guide to
Evaluation.’’ A copy of this document
can be accessed at https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/
other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/reports/
pmguide/pmguide_toc.html.
Logic Model. A logic model is a tool
that presents the conceptual framework
for a proposed project and explains the
linkages among program elements.
While there are many versions of the
logic model, they generally summarize
the logical connections among the needs
that are the focus of the project, project
goals and objectives, the target
population, project inputs (resources),
the proposed activities/processes/
outputs directed toward the target
population, the expected short- and
long-term outcomes the initiative is
designed to achieve, and the evaluation
plan for measuring the extent to which
proposed processes and outcomes
actually occur. Information on the
development of logic models is
available on the Internet at https://
www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/, or https://
www.extension.iastate.edu/cyfar/
capbuilding/outcome/
outcome_logicmdir.html.
Use of Human Subjects. If your
evaluation plan includes gathering data
from or about clients, there are specific
procedures which must be followed in
order to protect their privacy and ensure
the confidentiality of the information
about them. Applicants planning to
gather such data are asked to describe
their plans regarding an Institutional
Review Board (IRB) review. If
applicable, applicants must include a
completed Form 310, Protection of
Human Subjects. For more information
about use of human subjects and IRB’s
you can visit these Web sites: https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/
guidance/decisioncharts.htm, https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/
assurance/OF310.rtf, https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/
irb_chapter2.htm#d2, and https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/
guidance/ictips.htm.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
You may submit your application to
us in either electronic or paper format.
To submit an application electronically,
please use the https://www.Grants.gov/
Apply site. If you use Grants.gov, you
will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit the
application via the Grants.gov site. ACF
will not accept grant applications via email or facsimile transmission.
Please note the following if you plan
to submit your application
electronically via Grants.gov:
• Electronic submission is voluntary,
but strongly encouraged.
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation. We strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the application
process through Grants.gov.
• We recommend you visit Grants.gov
at least 30 days prior to filing your
application to fully understand the
process and requirements. We
encourage applicants who submit
electronically to submit well before the
closing date and time so that if
difficulties are encountered an applicant
can still send in a hard copy overnight.
If you encounter difficulties, please
contact the Grants.gov Help Desk at 1–
800–518–4276 to report the problem
and obtain assistance with the system.
• To use Grants.gov, you, as the
applicant, must have a DUNS Number
and register in the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR). You should allow a
minimum of five days to complete the
CCR registration.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit a grant
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you submit an
application in paper format.
• You may submit all documents
electronically, including all information
typically included on the SF 424 and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
• Your application must comply with
any page limitation requirements
described in this program
announcement.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgement from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The Administration
for Children and Families will retrieve
your application from Grants.gov.
• We may request that you provide
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
• You may access the electronic
application for this program on
www.Grants.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38961
• You must search for the
downloadable application package by
the CFDA number.
Private, non-profit organizations are
encouraged to submit with their
applications the survey located under
‘‘Grant Related Documents and Forms,’’
‘‘Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Applicants,’’ titled, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants,’’ at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Standard Forms and Certifications
The project description should
include all the information
requirements described in the specific
evaluation criteria outlined in the
program announcement under Section V
Application Review Information. In
addition to the project description, the
applicant needs to complete all the
standard forms required for making
applications for awards under this
announcement.
Applicants seeking financial
assistance under this announcement
must file the Standard Form (SF) 424,
Application for Federal Assistance; SF–
424A, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs; SF–424B,
Assurances—Non-Construction
Programs. The forms may be reproduced
for use in submitting applications.
Applicants must sign and return the
standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish prior to
award an executed copy of the Standard
Form LLL, Certification Regarding
Lobbying, when applying for an award
in excess of $100,000. Applicants who
have used non-Federal funds for
lobbying activities in connection with
receiving assistance under this
announcement shall complete a
disclosure form, if applicable, with their
applications (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 0348–0046). Applicants must
sign and return the certification with
their application.
Applicants must also understand they
will be held accountable for the
smoking prohibition included within
Public Law 103–227, Title XII
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also
known as the PRO–KIDS Act of 1994).
A copy of the Federal Register notice
which implements the smoking
prohibition is included with forms. By
signing and submitting the application,
applicants are providing the
certification and need not mail back the
certification with the application.
Applicants must make the appropriate
certification of their compliance with all
Federal statutes relating to
nondiscrimination. By signing and
submitting the applications, applicants
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
38962
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
are providing the certification and need
not mail back the certification form.
Complete the standard forms and the
associated certifications and assurances
based on the instructions on the forms.
The forms and certifications may be
found at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Those organizations required to
provide proof of non-profit status,
please refer to Section III.3.
Please see Section V.1, for
instructions on preparing the full
project description.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Explanation of Due Dates
The closing time and date for receipt
of applications is 4:30 p.m. (Eastern
Time Zone) on the date noted above.
Mailed or hand carried applications
received after 4:30 p.m. on the closing
date will be classified as late.
Deadline: Mailed applications shall be
considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or
before the deadline time and date at the
ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon
What to submit
Group, Inc., ATTN: Children’s Bureau,
118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC
20002–2132. Applicants are responsible
for mailing applications well in
advance, when using all mail services,
to ensure that the applications are
received on or before the deadline time
and date.
Applications handcarried by
applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by
overnight/express mail couriers shall be
considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or
before the deadline date, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., EST, at
the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The
Dixon Group, Inc., ATTN: Children’s
Bureau, 118 Q Street NE., Washington,
DC 20002–2132, between Monday and
Friday (excluding Federal holidays).
This address must appear on the
envelope/package containing the
application with the note. Applicants
are cautioned that express/overnight
mail services do not always deliver as
agreed.
Required content
Project Abstract .......................................
Project Narrative ......................................
SF424 ......................................................
SF424A ....................................................
SF424B ....................................................
Assurances and Certifications .................
Proof of Non-profit status, if applicable ...
Indirect Cost rate Agreement, if applicable.
Letters of commitment from partner organizations, if applicable.
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
IV and V ........
IV and V ........
IV ...................
IV ...................
IV ...................
IV ...................
III and IV ........
IV ...................
See Section IV ...................
Additional Forms: Private, nonprofit
organizations are encouraged to submit
with their applications the survey
Late applications: Applications which
do not meet the criteria above are
considered late applications. ACF shall
notify each late applicant that its
application will not be considered in
the current competition. Any
application received after 4:30 pm on
the deadline date will not be considered
for competition. Applicants using
express/overnight mail services should
allow two working days prior to the
deadline date for receipt of applications.
(Applicants are cautioned that express/
overnight mail services do not always
deliver as agreed).
Extension of deadlines: ACF may
extend application deadlines when
circumstances such as acts of God
(floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur, or when
there are widespread disruptions of mail
service, or in other rare cases. A
determination to extend or waive
deadline requirements rests with the
Chief Grants Management Officer.
Applicants will not be sent
acknowledgements of received
applications.
Checklist:
Required form or format
Format
Format
Format
Format
Format
Format
Format
Format
described
described
described
described
described
described
described
described
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
Section IV and V ....
Section IV and V ....
Section IV ...............
Section IV ...............
Section IV ...............
Section IV ...............
Section III ...............
IV ............................
Format described in IV ............................
located under ‘‘Grant Related
Documents and Forms’’ titled ‘‘Survey
for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Required content
Required form or format
Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Applicants.
Per required form ...............
May be found on https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ and 45 CFR Part 100,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of
Department of Health and Human
Services Programs and Activities.’’
Under the Order, States may design
their own processes for reviewing and
commenting on proposed Federal
assistance under covered programs.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
As of October 1, 2004, the following
jurisdictions have elected to participate
in the Executive Order process:
Arkansas, California, Delaware, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri,
Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa,
Guam, North Mariana Islands, Puerto
Rico, and Virgin Islands. As these
jurisdictions have elected to participate
in the Executive Order process, they
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By
By
By
By
By
By
By
By
application due date.
application due date.
application due date.
application due date.
application due date.
Time of Award.
Time of Award.
Time of Award.
By Time of Award.
Applicants’’ at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
What to submit
4. Intergovernmental Review
When to submit
When to submit
With application.
have established SPOCs. Applicants
from participating jurisdictions should
contact their SPOC, as soon as possible,
to alert them of prospective applications
and receive instructions. Applicants
must submit all required materials, if
any, to the SPOC and indicate the date
of this submittal (or the date of contact
if no submittal is required) on the
Standard Form 424, item 16a. Under 45
CFR 100.8(a)(2).
A SPOC has 60 days from the
application deadline to comment on
proposed new or competing
continuation awards. SPOCs are
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
encouraged to eliminate the submission
of routine endorsements as official
recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs
are requested to clearly differentiate
between mere advisory comments and
those official State process
recommendations which may trigger the
‘‘accommodate or explain’’ rule.
When comments are submitted
directly to ACF, they should be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Grants Management,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., 4th floor,
Washington, DC 20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions
have chosen not to participate in the
process, entities that meet the eligibility
requirements of the program are still
eligible to apply for a grant even if a
State, Territory, Commonwealth, etc.
does not have a SPOC. Therefore,
applicants from these jurisdictions, or
for projects administered by Federallyrecognized Indian Tribes, need take no
action in regard to E.O. 12372.
The official list, including addresses,
of the jurisdictions elected to participate
in E.O. 12372 can be found on the
following URL: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html.
5. Funding Restrictions
Grant awards will not allow
reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Construction is not an allowable
activity or expenditure under this
solicitation.
Applicants should note that grants to
be awarded under this program
announcement are subject to the
availability of funds. The size of the
actual awards will vary.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Submission by Mail: An Application
must provide an original application
with all attachments, signed by an
authorized representative and two
copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an
explanation of due dates. Applications
should be mailed to: ACYF Operations
Center, The Dixon Group, 118 Q St. NE.,
Washington DC, DC 20002–2132,
Attention: Children’s Bureau.
Hand Delivery: An Applicant must
provide an original application with all
attachments signed by an authorized
representative and two copies. Please
see Section IV.3 for an explanation of
due dates. Applications should be
delivered to: ACYF Operations Center,
The Dixon Group, 118 Q St. NE.,
Washington DC 20002–2132, Attention:
Children’s Bureau.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
38963
Electronic Submission: https://
www.grants.gov Please see section IV. 2
Content and Form of Application
Submission, for guidelines and
requirements when submitting
applications electronically.
Project Summary/Abstract
V. Application Review Information
Clearly identify the physical,
economic, social, financial,
institutional, and/or other problem(s)
requiring a solution. The need for
assistance must be demonstrated and
the principal and subordinate objectives
of the project must be clearly stated;
supporting documentation, such as
letters of support and testimonials from
concerned interests other than the
applicant, may be included. Any
relevant data based on planning studies
should be included or referred to in the
endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate
demographic data and participant/
beneficiary information, as needed. In
developing the project description, the
applicant may volunteer or be requested
to provide information on the total
range of projects currently being
conducted and supported (or to be
initiated), some of which may be
outside the scope of the program
announcement.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13)
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 40 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining
the data needed and reviewing the
collection information.
The project description is approved
under OMB control number 0970–0139
which expires 4/30/2007.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The following are instructions and
guidelines on how to prepare the
‘‘Project Summary/Abstract’’ and ‘‘Full
Project Description’’ sections of the
application. Under the evaluation
criteria section, note that each criterion
is preceded by the generic evaluation
requirement under the ACF Uniform
Project Description (UPD).
1. Criteria
General Instructions
ACF is particularly interested in
specific project descriptions that focus
on outcomes and convey strategies for
achieving intended performance. Project
descriptions are evaluated on the basis
of substance and measurable outcomes,
not length. Extensive exhibits are not
required. Cross-referencing should be
used rather than repetition. Supporting
information concerning activities that
will not be directly funded by the grant
or information that does not directly
pertain to an integral part of the grant
funded activity should be placed in an
appendix. Pages should be numbered
and a table of contents should be
included for easy reference.
Introduction
Applicants required to submit a full
project description shall prepare the
project description statement in
accordance with the following
instructions while being aware of the
specified evaluation criteria. The text
options give a broad overview of what
your project description should include
while the evaluation criteria identifies
the measures that will be used to
evaluate applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Provide a summary of the project
description (a page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
Objectives and Need for Assistance
Approach
Outline a plan of action that describes
the scope and detail of how the
proposed work will be accomplished.
Account for all functions or activities
identified in the application. Cite factors
that might accelerate or decelerate the
work and state your reason for taking
the proposed approach rather than
others. Describe any unusual features of
the project such as design or
technological innovations, reductions in
cost or time, or extraordinary social and
community involvement. Provide
quantitative monthly or quarterly
projections of the accomplishments to
be achieved for each function or activity
in such terms as the number of people
to be served and the number of activities
accomplished.
When accomplishments cannot be
quantified by activity or function, list
them in chronological order to show the
schedule of accomplishments and their
target dates. If any data is to be
collected, maintained, and/or
disseminated, clearance may be
required from the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). This
clearance pertains to any ‘‘collection of
information that is conducted or
sponsored by ACF.’’ List organizations,
cooperating entities, consultants, or
other key individuals who will work on
the project along with a short
description of the nature of their effort
or contribution.
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
38964
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
Organizational Profiles
Provide information on the applicant
organization(s) and cooperating
partners, such as organizational charts,
financial statements, audit reports or
statements from CPAs/Licensed Public
Accountants, Employer Identification
Numbers, names of bond carriers,
contact persons and telephone numbers,
child care licenses and other
documentation of professional
accreditation, information on
compliance with Federal/State/local
government standards, documentation
of experience in the program area, and
other pertinent information. If the
applicant is a non-profit organization,
submit proof of non-profit status in its
application. The non-profit agency can
accomplish this by providing: (a) A
reference to the applicant organization’s
listing in the Internal Revenue Service’s
(IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt
organizations described in the IRS Code;
(b) a copy of a currently valid IRS tax
exemption certificate, (c) a statement
from a State taxing body, State attorney
general, or other appropriate State
official certifying that the applicant
organization has a non-profit status and
that none of the net earnings accrue to
any private shareholders or individuals;
(d) a certified copy of the organization’s
certificate of incorporation or similar
document that clearly establishes nonprofit status, (e) any of the items
immediately above for a State or
national parent organization and a
statement signed by the parent
organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit
affiliate.
Budget and Budget Justification
Provide a budget with line item detail
and detailed calculations for each
budget object class identified on the
Budget Information form. Detailed
calculations must include estimation
methods, quantities, unit costs, and
other similar quantitative detail
sufficient for the calculation to be
duplicated. Also include a breakout by
the funding sources identified in Block
15 of the SF–424. Provide a narrative
budget justification that describes how
the categorical costs are derived.
Discuss the necessity, reasonableness,
and allocability of the proposed costs.
General
Use the following guidelines for
preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and nonFederal resources shall be detailed and
justified in the budget and narrative
justification. ‘‘Federal resources’’ refers
only to the ACF grant for which you are
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
applying. ‘‘Non Federal resources’’ are
all other Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget
amounts and computations be presented
in a columnar format: First column,
object class categories; second column,
Federal budget; next column(s), nonFederal budget(s), and last column, total
budget. The budget justification should
be a narrative.
Personnel
Description: Costs of employee
salaries and wages. Justification:
Identify the project director or principal
investigator, if known. For each staff
person, provide the title, time
commitment to the project (in months),
time commitment to the project (as a
percentage or full-time equivalent),
annual salary, grant salary, wage rates,
etc. Do not include the costs of
consultants or personnel costs of
delegate agencies or of specific
project(s) or businesses to be financed
by the applicant.
Fringe Benefits
Description: Costs of employee fringe
benefits unless treated as part of an
approved indirect cost rate.
Justification: Provide a breakdown of
the amounts and percentages that
comprise fringe benefit costs such as
health insurance, FICA, retirement
insurance, taxes, etc.
Travel
Description: Costs of project-related
travel by employees of the applicant
organization (does not include costs of
consultant travel). Justification: For each
trip, show the total number of
traveler(s), travel destination, duration
of trip, per diem, mileage allowances, if
privately owned vehicles will be used,
and other transportation costs and
subsistence allowances. Travel costs for
key staff to attend ACF-sponsored
workshops should be detailed in the
budget.
Equipment
Description: ‘‘Equipment’’ means an
article of nonexpendable, tangible
personal property having a useful life of
more than one year and an acquisition
cost which equals or exceeds the lesser
of (a) the capitalization level established
by the organization for the financial
statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note:
Acquisition cost means the net invoice
unit price of an item of equipment,
including the cost of any modifications,
attachments, accessories, or auxiliary
apparatus necessary to make it usable
for the purpose for which it is acquired.
Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty,
protective in-transit insurance, freight,
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and installation shall be included in or
excluded from acquisition cost in
accordance with the organization’s
regular written accounting practices.)
Justification: For each type of
equipment requested, provide a
description of the equipment, the cost
per unit, the number of units, the total
cost, and a plan for use on the project,
as well as use or disposal of the
equipment after the project ends. An
applicant organization that uses its own
definition for equipment should provide
a copy of its policy or section of its
policy which includes the equipment
definition.
Supplies
Description: Costs of all tangible
personal property other than that
included under the Equipment category.
Justification: Specify general categories
of supplies and their costs. Show
computations and provide other
information which supports the amount
requested.
Contractual
Description: Costs of all contracts for
services and goods except for those that
belong under other categories such as
equipment, supplies, construction, etc.
Include third party evaluation contracts
(if applicable) and contracts with
secondary recipient organizations,
including delegate agencies and specific
project(s) or businesses to be financed
by the applicant. Justification:
Demonstrate that all procurement
transactions will be conducted in a
manner to provide, to the maximum
extent practical, open and free
competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are
required to use Part 92 procedures, must
justify any anticipated procurement
action that is expected to be awarded
without competition and exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold fixed at
41 U.S.C. 403(11) (currently set at
$100,000).
Recipients might be required to make
available to ACF pre-award review and
procurement documents, such as
request for proposals or invitations for
bids, independent cost estimates, etc.
Note: Whenever the applicant intends to
delegate part of the project to another
agency, the applicant must provide a
detailed budget and budget narrative for
each delegate agency, by agency title,
along with the required supporting
information referred to in these
instructions.
Other
Enter the total of all other costs. Such
costs, where applicable and appropriate,
may include but are not limited to
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
insurance, food, medical and dental
costs (noncontractual), professional
services costs, space and equipment
rentals, printing and publication,
computer use, training costs, such as
tuition and stipends, staff development
costs, and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a
narrative description and a justification
for each cost under this category.
Indirect Charges
Description: Total amount of indirect
costs. This category should be used only
when the applicant currently has an
indirect cost rate approved by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant
Federal agency. Justification: An
applicant that will charge indirect costs
to the grant must enclose a copy of the
current rate agreement. If the applicant
organization is in the process of initially
developing or renegotiating a rate, upon
notification that an award will be made,
it should immediately develop a
tentative indirect cost rate proposal
based on its most recently completed
fiscal year, in accordance with the
cognizant agency’s guidelines for
establishing indirect cost rates, and
submit it to the cognizant agency.
Applicants awaiting approval of their
indirect cost proposals may also request
indirect costs. When an indirect cost
rate is requested, those costs included in
the indirect cost pool should not also be
charged as direct costs to the grant.
Also, if the applicant is requesting a rate
which is less than what is allowed
under the program, the authorized
representative of the applicant
organization must submit a signed
acknowledgement that the applicant is
accepting a lower rate than allowed.
Evaluation Criteria
The following evaluation criteria
appear in weighted descending order.
The corresponding score values indicate
the relative importance that ACF places
on each evaluation criterion; however,
applicants need not develop their
applications precisely according to the
order presented. Application
components may be organized such that
a reviewer will be able to follow a
seamless and logical flow of information
(e.g. from a broad overview of the
project to more detailed information
about how it will be conducted.
In considering how applicants will
carry out the responsibilities addressed
under this announcement, competing
applications for financial assistance will
be reviewed and evaluated against the
following criteria:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Approach—50 Points
In reviewing the approach, the
following factors will be considered: (50
points)
1. The extent to which there is a
sound timeline for effectively
implementing the proposed project,
including major milestones and target
dates.
2. The extent to which the proposed
project would enhance policy, improve
practice, and advance science in child
maltreatment research. The extent to
which the proposed project would be
significant to the field of child welfare
researchers.
3. The extent to which the proposed
project would contribute to the overall
effort to improve the safety, permanence
and well-being of children and address
particular outcome measures, as
applicable.
4. The extent to which the applicant
identifies relevant barriers and problems
associated with a national archive and
proposes effective solutions to these
problems.
5. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates an awareness of current
activities being undertaken in the field
of archiving and describes how the
approach being proposed would
effectively build on this work. The
extent to which the proposed project
would be different from previous efforts
in ways that improve processes and
results.
6. The extent to which the proposed
project would reflect cultural sensitivity
to the issues being addressed.
7. The extent to which the proposed
project would address the issues related
to the particular challenges of archiving
and confidentiality, including the
strengths and weaknesses of possible
strategies that address masking
individual identifiers, and user
agreements that particularly address
protections for confidentiality and limit
liability. The extent to which the
proposed project would explain the
relationship between archiving and the
protection of human subjects, informed
consent, protection from research risks,
and Institutional Review Boards (IRB) in
general. The extent to which the
proposed project would address the
relationship of the funded archive to
Institutional Review Boards and the
Department of Health and Human
Services Office for Protection from
Research Risks and Certificates of
Confidentiality, specifically.
8. The extent to which the proposed
project would address the strengths and
weaknesses of possible strategies that
deal with limited, hierarchical, or
controlled access and user agreements
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38965
that particularly address confidentiality
and liability. The extent to which the
applicant discusses a variety of models
for delimiting access and the impact of
fee structures related to access and
proposes recommendations regarding
access controls for the proposed
activity.
9. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates an ability to gain access to
necessary information, data sets, and
data bases, as applicable, and delineates
a sound plan for addressing any ethical
issues that may arise in the use of these
data sets.
10. The extent to which the
application effectively addresses the
uses and merits of an advisory
committee.
11. The extent to which there are
sound strategies for dissemination of
products and reports that would be of
use to other researchers and
practitioners in the field.
12. The extent to which the applicant
proposes a sound strategy for providing
supplementary support to data users
who access National Survey of Child
and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW)
data through the National Data Archive
on Child Abuse and Neglect during Year
1.
Organizational Profiles—20 Points
In reviewing the organizational
profiles, the following factors will be
considered: (20 points)
1. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates strong organizational
experience specifically related to
archiving, and its sub-tasks, and
conducting child maltreatment and
child welfare research. The extent to
which the applicant demonstrates a
sound working knowledge of ACF data
collection activities related to the data
archive. The extent to which each
participating university or agency
partner possesses the organizational
capabilities required for implementation
of this activity.
2. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates sufficient resources and
the appropriate facilities to undertake
the project.
3. The extent to which the proposed
project director and key project staff
possess sufficient relevant knowledge,
experience and the capabilities to
implement and manage a project of this
size, scope and complexity effectively
(e.g., resumes). The extent to which the
roles, responsibilities and time
commitments of each proposed project
staff position, including consultants,
subcontractors and/or partners, are
clearly defined and appropriate to the
successful implementation of the
proposed project with respect to
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
38966
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
developing and maintaining a national
archive on child welfare and child
abuse and neglect data.
The extent to which there is a sound
management plan for achieving the
objectives of the proposed project on
time and within budget, including
clearly defined responsibilities, for
accomplishing project tasks and
ensuring quality. The extent to which
the plan clearly describes the effective
management and coordination of
activities carried out by any partners,
subcontractors and consultants (if
appropriate). The extent to which there
would be a mutually beneficial
relationship between the proposed
project and other work planned,
anticipated or underway with Federal
assistance by the applicant.
Objectives and Need for Assistance—20
Points
In reviewing the objectives and need
for assistance, the following factors will
be considered: (20 points)
1. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates an understanding of the
general need for archiving, and
specifically, the need for archiving the
Children’s Bureau (CB) child welfare
and child abuse and neglect data. The
extent to which the application clearly
describes specific measurable
objectives.
2. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates an awareness of current
initiatives in the field of child
maltreatment and archiving and clearly
describes how the approach being
proposed would address both.
3. The extent to which the applicant
discusses current issues in archiving
including but not limited to topics such
as the world wide web, dissemination
strategies, liability, and terms of use
agreements.
4. The extent to which the applicant
clearly describes the audience of users
of the data archive, provides a
reasonable estimate of their number and
describes their needs.
Budget and Budget Justification—10
Points
In reviewing the budget and budget
justification, the following factors will
be considered: (10 points)
1. The extent to which the costs of the
proposed project are reasonable and
appropriate in view of the activities to
be conducted and expected results and
benefits.
2. The extent to which the applicant’s
fiscal controls and accounting
procedures would ensure prudent use,
proper and timely disbursement and
accurate accounting of funds received
under the program announcement.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
2. Review and Selection Process
Since ACF will be using non-Federal
reviewers in the review process,
applicants have the option of omitting
from the application copies (not the
original) of specific salary rates or
amounts for individuals specified in the
application budget.
No grant award will be made under
this announcement on the basis of an
incomplete application.
When the Operations Center receives
your application it will be screened to
confirm that your application was
received by the deadline. Federal staff
will verify that you are an eligible
applicant and that the application
contains all the essential elements.
Applications received from ineligible
organizations and applications received
after the deadline will be withdrawn
from further consideration.
A panel of at least three reviewers
(primarily experts from outside the
Federal government) will use the
evaluation criteria described in this
announcement to evaluate each
application. The reviewers will
determine the strengths and weaknesses
of each application, provide comments
about the strengths and weaknesses and
give each application a numerical score.
The results of the competitive review
are a primary factor in making funding
decisions. In addition, Federal staff
conducts administrative reviews of the
applications and, in light of the results
of the competitive review, will
recommend applications for funding to
the ACYF Commissioner. ACYF
reserves the option of discussing
applications with other funding sources
when this is in the best interest of the
Federal government. ACYF may also
solicit and consider comments from
ACF Regional Office staff in making
funding decisions. ACYF may take into
consideration the involvement
(financial and/or programmatic) of the
private sector, national, or State or
community foundations; a favorable
balance between Federal and nonFederal funds for the proposed project;
or the potential for high benefit from
low Federal investment. ACYF may
elect not to fund any applicants having
known management, fiscal, reporting,
programmatic, or other problems which
make it unlikely that they would be able
to provide effective services or
effectively complete the proposed
activity.
With the results of the peer review
and the information from Federal staff,
the Commissioner of ACYF makes the
final funding decisions. The
Commissioner may give special
consideration to applications proposing
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
services of special interest to the
Government and to achieve geographic
distributions of grant awards.
Applications of special interest may
include, but are not limited to,
applications focusing on unserved or
inadequately served clients or service
areas and programs addressing diverse
ethnic populations.
Approved But Unfunded Applications
Applications that are approved but
unfunded may be held over for funding
in the next funding cycle, pending the
availability of funds, for a period not to
exceed one year.
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates. Applications will be
reviewed in the summer of 2005. Grant
awards will have a start date no later
than September 30, 2005.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The successful applicants will be
notified through the issuance of a
Financial Assistance Award document
which sets forth the amount of funds
granted, the terms and conditions of the
grant, the effective date of the grant, the
budget period for which initial support
will be given, the non-Federal share to
be provided, and the total project period
for which support is contemplated. The
Financial Assistance Award will be
signed by the Grants Officer and
transmitted via postal mail.
Organizations whose applications will
not be funded will be notified in
writing.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Direct Federal grants, sub-award
funds, or contracts under this CB
National Data Archive on Child Abuse
and Neglect program shall not be used
to support inherently religious activities
such as religious instruction, worship,
or proselytization. Therefore,
organizations must take steps to
separate, in time or location, their
inherently religious activities from the
services funded under this Program.
Regulations pertaining to the Equal
Treatment For Faith-Based
Organizations, which includes the
prohibition against Federal funding of
inherently religious activities, can be
found at either 45 CFR 87.1 or the HHS
Web site at https://www.os.dhhs.gov/
fbci/waisgate21.pdf.
45 CFR Part 74, 92. Grantees are
subject to the requirements in 45 CFR
part 74 (non-governmental) or 45 CFR
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Notices
38967
part 92 (governmental) as well as 45
CFR part 87.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
3. Reporting Requirements
Administration for Children and
Families
Food and Drug Administration
Program Progress Reports: SemiAnnually.
Financial Reports: Semi-Annually.
Grantees will be required to submit
program progress reports and financial
reports (SF269) throughout the project
period. Program progress and financial
reports are due 30 days after the
reporting period. In addition, final
programmatic and financial reports are
due 90 days after the close of the project
period.
VII. Agency Contacts
Notice of Correction for Services to
Unaccompanied Alien Children
Services (UAC) Program To Provide
Temporary Shelter Care and Other
Related Services to Children in Office
of Refugee Resettlement (ORR)
Custody
Office of Refugee Resettlement
(ORR), Administration for Children and
Families, ACF, DHHS.
ACTION: Notice of Correction.
AGENCY:
Peter Thompson, Grants Officer,
Administration for Children and
Families, Children’s Bureau, 330 C
Street, SW., Room 2070, Washington,
DC 20447, Phone: 202–401–4608, Email: pathompson@acf.hhs.gov.
Funding Opportunity Title: Services
to Unaccompanied Alien Children.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2005–ACF–ORR–ZU–0007.
SUMMARY: This notice is to inform
interested parties of a clarification made
to Services to Unaccompanied Alien
Children funding announcement
published on Monday, June 17, 2005.
The following clarifications should be
noted:
Section I, Group I, Chart I on Page #
32345:
VIII. Other Information
Group I.—Geographic Location
Program Office Contact
John Gaudiosi, Children’s Bureau, 330
C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Phone: 202–205–8625, E-mail:
jgaudiosi@acf.hhs.gov.
Grants Management Office Contact
Notice: Beginning with FY 2006, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) will no longer publish
grant announcements in the Federal
Register. Beginning October 1, 2005
applicants will be able to find a
synopsis of all ACF grant opportunities
and apply electronically for
opportunities via: https://
www.Grants.gov. Applicants will also be
able to find the complete text of all ACF
grant announcements on the ACF Web
site located at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
grants/.
Additional information about this
program and its purpose can be located
on the following Web sites: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/.
For general questions regarding this
announcement please contact: ACYF
Operations Center, The Dixon Group
ATTN: Children’s Bureau, 118 Q Street,
NE., Washington DC 20002–2132,
Telephone: 866–796–1591.
Applicants will not be sent
acknowledgements of received
applications.
Dated: June 28, 2005.
Joan E. Ohl,
Commissioner, Administration on Children,
Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. 05–13303 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Jul 05, 2005
No. 14, Up to 120 suitability
assessment cases per applicant (two
awards available) $1.9 million (for a
total of $3.8 million for this category).
Group II.—Geographic Location
No. 1, Los Angeles, Basic Shelter and/
or Group Homes, 24 beds $1.76 million.
Section II. Award Information on Page
#32350 stated the following:
‘‘Floor on Amount of Individual
Awards: $3,300,000 per budget period.’’
Section I, Group I, Chart I on Page
#32345 is replaced with:
Group I.—Geographic Location
‘‘No. 14, Up to 120 suitability
assessment cases per application (two
awards available) $800,000 (for a total of
$1.6 million for this category).’’
Group II.—Geographic Location
‘‘No. 1, Los Angeles, Basic Shelter
and/or Group Homes, 24 beds $1.75
million.’’
Section II. Award Information on Page
#32350 is replaced with:
‘‘Floor on Amount of Individual
Awards: $218,000 per budget period.’’
Dated: June 28, 2005.
Nguyen Van Hanh,
Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement.
[FR Doc. 05–13299 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Peripheral and Central Nervous
System Drugs Advisory Committee;
Notice of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The meeting will be open to the
public.
Name of Committee: Peripheral and
Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory
Committee.
General Function of the Committee:
To provide advice and
recommendations to the agency on
FDA’s regulatory issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on August 4, 2005, from 8 a.m. to
5 p.m.
Location: Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (CDER) Advisory
Committee Conference Room, rm. 1066,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD.
Contact Person: Anuja Patel, Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD–
21), Food and Drug Administration,
5600 Fishers Lane (for express delivery,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1093), Rockville,
MD 20857, 301–827–7001, FAX: 301–
827–6776, e-mail: patelA@cder.fda.gov,
or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1–800–741–8138
(301–443–0572 in the Washington, DC
area), code 3014512543. Please call the
Information Line for up-to-date
information on this meeting. When
available, background materials for this
meeting will be posted 1 business day
prior to the meeting on the FDA Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/
dockets/ac/acmenu.htm. (Click on the
year 2005 and scroll down to Peripheral
and Central Nervous System Drugs
Advisory Committee).
Agenda: The committee will discuss
new drug application (NDA) 21–645,
proposed trade name MT100 (naproxen
sodium and metoclopramide
hydrochloride) Tablets, Pozen, Inc., for
the proposed indication of acute
treatment of migraine headache with or
without aura.
Procedure: Interested persons may
present data, information, or views,
orally or in writing, on issues pending
before the committee. Written
submissions may be made to the contact
person by July 22, 2005. Oral
presentations from the public will be
scheduled between approximately 1
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38957-38967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-13303]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, Children's
Bureau
Funding Opportunity Title: National Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect.
Announcement Type: Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS-2005-ACF-ACYF-CA-0086.
CFDA Number: 93.670.
Due Date for Applications: Applications are due August 10, 2005.
Category of Funding Activity: Social Security and Income Services.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this funding announcement is to award a cooperative
agreement to continue the operation of the national data archive on
child abuse and neglect, and to continue the processing and housing of
high quality data sets and related activities that facilitate the use
of archived data.
In year 1, the grantee will provide supplementary support to data
users who access National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being
(NSCAW) data through the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect.
Priority Area 1
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The purpose of this funding announcement is to award a cooperative
agreement to continue the operation of the national data archive on
child abuse and neglect, and to continue the processing and housing of
high quality data sets and related activities that facilitate the use
of archived data.
In year 1, the grantee will provide supplementary support to data
users who access National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being
(NSCAW) data through the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect.
Background
The purpose of this funding announcement is to award a cooperative
agreement to continue the operation of the national data archive on
child abuse and neglect and to continue the processing and housing of
high quality
[[Page 38958]]
data sets and related activities that facilitate the use of archived
data.
In year 1, the grantee will provide supplementary support to data
users who access National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being
(NSCAW) data through the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect.
In this funding announcement, ACYF seeks to ensure funding for one
of the components of a research structure identified as critical in the
report of the Panel on Research on Child Abuse and Neglect of the
National Research Council. The Archive is needed to make available and
support research on the prevention, identification and treatment of
child abuse and neglect, adoption, foster care, and related child
welfare issues. Since September 30, 1988, the National Center on Child
Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN), and now the Children's Bureau (CB), has
provided funding for the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and
Neglect. The Archive is currently located at Cornell University, Family
Life Development Center, MVR Hall, Ithaca, New York, 14853-4401
(telephone 607-255-7799). The Archive is a centralized facility for the
acquisition, preservation, and dissemination of machine-readable data
sets relevant to the study of child maltreatment and child welfare. The
Archive currently holds 24 data sets and has produced an updated
document that has been widely disseminated to the field: `Depositing
Data with the National Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect: A Handbook
for Investigators.' Information on the data sets can be obtained from
the Archive. The Handbook can be obtained from the Archive directly or
downloaded through its Web page, https://www.ndacan.cornell.edu/, or
through the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect
Information.
This is a full and open competition. It is expected that the
successful applicant, whether the current grantee or a new grantee,
will continue to build on the present activities and negotiate
transition of the project in a professional manner, respectful of the
proprietary nature of some of the material housed at and created by the
current grantee, as necessary.
The Archive is responsible for a variety of activities: To prepare,
process, house and preserve quality data sets; to establish standards
and procedures for documentation and produce related materials; to
facilitate collaboration through training, technical assistance,
workshops featuring specific data sets (including the National Survey
of Child and Adolescent Well-Being), and summer institutes; to create
and utilize an advisory board of some kind; and dissemination through a
variety of outreach methods. Applicants are encouraged to consider this
list of activities as minimal requirements.
While a major function of the Archive is to process, house, and
preserve quality data sets from studies on child abuse and neglect, an
archive also plays a critical role in setting standards and
establishing good practices for documentation of data sets.
Establishing such procedures enables data to be more readily available
and easily shared with other researchers and provides the additional
capacity for further and secondary analysis.
Any child welfare investigator, regardless of the funding source,
is welcome to house data with the Archive. Since FY 1994, all research
grantees funded by the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect
(NCCAN), and now all those funded by the Children's Bureau, have been
required, as a condition of their award, to archive their data. They
must prepare data sets according to sound data processing and
documentation practices and to house those data sets at the Archive
within two years of the end of their funding period. Archive staff
provide technical support on data entry, processing, analysis, and
documentation. Thus, the application submitted in response to this
priority area should be responsive to housing data sets from a variety
of sources, including but not limited to national surveys such as those
conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, the National
Incidence Studies, the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System
(NCANDS), and the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting
System (AFCARS), and the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-
Being (NSCAW).
A centralized archive can facilitate collaboration among
researchers for knowledge building and encourage new researchers to
enter the field. An archive should also provide training and technical
assistance opportunities for new researchers or postdoctoral candidates
by conducting training institutes that convene a small number of
researchers to work in a guided setting with these data sets. Support
for secondary analysis of various data sets in the Archive can be
provided through these training institutes as well as through small
grants to researchers to work with these data sets. Support may be
provided for graduate research or postdoctoral research fellows to work
in residence with Archive staff on research related to the holdings.
Workshops and training sessions can also be convened at major national
conferences.
There is an increasing recognition that some data sets cannot be
archived in their entirety for public use without undue risk to the
study respondents. Researchers are understandably concerned about the
possibility of breaches of confidentiality, and the intentional and
unintentional unmasking of identifying information in these sensitive
data sets. In order to protect participants' identities in a public use
data set, researchers often must delete or mask important variables in
the data set, which limits the utility of the data for secondary
analyses. One solution has been to provide access to the more detailed
data on a restricted basis, by obtaining assurances from the user that
the data sets will be carefully handled and will be used only for
legitimate research purposes. For example, the National Center for
Educational Statistics has developed licensing and monitoring
procedures that allow for the release of micro-data that otherwise
would not be available to the broader research community. The Archive
should anticipate the need for maintaining similar licensing and
monitoring procedures for similarly sensitive data sets, including the
data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being.
Dissemination is a major function of an archive. This includes
providing innovative tools such as CD-ROMs and a range of ready-to-use
formats that make archived data sets more easily accessible to the
research community; answering AFCARS data requests from the public and
referring these requests to the Children's Bureau as needed, publishing
information on projects of the Archive and new acquisitions;
preparation of technical guidelines outlining data processing standards
and user guides to archive holdings; and the development and
maintenance of electronic mail services to facilitate networking and
information exchange among researchers in the field of child abuse and
neglect, including their access to a database on measures appropriate
for researchers in this field. Cooperation and appropriate
collaboration with other archives also is expected.
Legislative Authority
The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act Section 105(b)(5) (42
U.S.C. 5106) Section 429 of the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunities Reconciliation Act (Pub. L. 104-193).
Projects funded under this announcement will be expected to:
1. Have the project fully functioning within 90 days following the
notification of the grant award.
[[Page 38959]]
2. Participate if the Children's Bureau chooses to do a national
evaluation or a technical assistance contract that relates to this
funding announcement.
3. Submit all performance indicator data, program and financial
reports in a timely manner, in recommended format (to be provided), and
submit the final report on disk or electronically using a standard
word-processing program.
4. Submit a copy of the final report, the evaluation report, and
any program products to the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and
Neglect Information, 330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20447, within 90
days of project end date. This is in addition to the standard
requirement that the final program and evaluation report must also be
submitted to the Grants Management Specialist and the Federal Project
Officer.
5. Allocate sufficient funds in the budget to:
(a) Provide for the project director, the evaluator and a child
welfare representative to attend an annual 3-day grantees' meeting in
Washington, DC.
(b) Provide for the project director, the evaluator and a child
welfare representative to attend an early kickoff meeting for grantees
funded under this priority area to be held within the first three
months of the project (first year only) in Washington, DC; and
(c) Provide for 10-15 percent of the proposed budget to project
evaluation.
II. Award Information
Funding Instrument Type: Cooperative Agreement.
Federal Substantial Involvement With Cooperative Agreement
A cooperative agreement is a specific method of awarding Federal
assistance in which substantial Federal involvement is anticipated. A
cooperative agreement clearly defines the respective responsibilities
of the Children's Bureau and the grantee prior to the award. The
Children's Bureau anticipates that agency involvement will produce
programmatic benefits to the recipient otherwise unavailable to them
for carrying out the project. The involvement and collaboration
includes Children's Bureau review and approval of planning stages of
the activities before implementation phases may begin; Children's
Bureau involvement in the establishment of policies and procedures that
maximize open competition, and rigorous and impartial development,
review and funding of grant or sub-grant activities, if applicable; and
Children's Bureau and recipient joint collaboration in the performance
of key programmatic activities (i.e., strategic planning,
implementation, information technology enhancements, training and
technical assistance, publications or products, and evaluation). It
also includes close monitoring by the Children's Bureau of the
requirements stated in this announcement that limit the grantee's
discretion with respect to scope of services offered, organizational
structure and management processes, coupled with close Children's
Bureau monitoring during performance, which may, in order to ensure
compliance with the intent of this funding, exceed those federal
stewardship responsibilities customary for grant activities.
Anticipated Total Priority Area Funding: $600,000.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 0 to 1.
Ceiling on Amount of Individual Awards Per Budget Period: $600,000.
Average Projected Award Amount: $600,000.
Length of Project Periods: 60-month project with five 12-month
budget periods.
Other.
Explanation of Other: In the first budget period, the maximum
Federal share of the project is not to exceed $600,000. In subsequent
budget periods, the maximum Federal share of the project is not to
exceed $500,000. The projects awarded will be for a project period of
60 months. The initial grant award will be for a 12-month budget
period. The award of continuation beyond each 12-month budget period
will be subject to the availability of funds, satisfactory progress on
the part of the grantee, and a determination that continued funding
would be in the best interest of the government.
Floor on amount of individual awards: None.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
State governments
County governments
City or township governments
Special district governments
Independent school districts
State controlled institutions of higher education
Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized)
Public Housing authorities/Indian housing authorities
Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized
tribal governments)
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
Private institutions of higher education
Individuals
For-profit organization other than small businesses
Small businesses
Additional Information on Eligibility
Faith-based and community organizations that meet all other
eligibility requirements are eligible to apply.
Applicant should have experience with archiving and analyzing
AFCARS and NCANDS data, the two primary databases utilized by the
Children's Bureau.
Applicant should possess a sound working knowledge of ACF data
collection activities related to the data archive.
Collaborative and interdisciplinary efforts are acceptable, but
applications should identify a primary applicant responsible for
administering the grant.
2. Cost Sharing/Matching
Cost Sharing/Matching: None.
3. Other Eligibility Information
All applicants must have a Dun & Bradstreet number. On June 27,
2003 the Office of Management and Budget published in the Federal
Register a new Federal policy applicable to all Federal grant
applicants. The policy requires all Federal grant applicants to provide
a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number when
applying for Federal grants or cooperative agreements on or after
October 1, 2003. The DUNS number will be required whether an applicant
is submitting a paper application or using the government-wide
electronic portal (https://www.Grants.gov). A DUNS number will be
required for every application for a new award or renewal/continuation
of an award, including applications or plans under formula, entitlement
and block grant programs, submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization has a DUNS number. You may
acquire a DUNS number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free
DUNS number request line on 1-866-705-5711 or you may request a number
on-line at https://www.dnb.com.
Non-profit organizations applying for funding are required to
submit proof of their non-profit status.
Proof of non-profit status is any one of the following:
A reference to the applicant organization's listing in the
Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list
[[Page 38960]]
of tax-exempt organizations described in the IRS Code.
A copy of a currently valid IRS tax exemption certificate.
A statement from a State taxing body, State attorney
general, or other appropriate State official certifying that the
applicant organization has a non-profit status and that none of the net
earning accrue to any private shareholders or individuals.
A certified copy of the organization's certificate of
incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes non-profit
status.
Any of the items in the subparagraphs immediately above
for a State or national parent organization and a statement signed by
the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local non-
profit affiliate.
Disqualification Factors
Applications that exceed the ceiling amount will be considered non-
responsive and will not be considered for funding under this
announcement.
Any application post-marked after 4:30 p.m. eastern time zone on
the deadline date will not be considered for competition.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
ACYF Operations, The Dixon Group ATTN: Children's Bureau, 118 Q
St., NE., Washington, DC 20002-2132, Phone: 866-796-1591, URL: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/open/HHS-2005-ACF-ACYF-CA-0001.html.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Originals, Copies and Signatures
If submitting your application in paper format, an original and two
copies of the complete application are required. The original and each
of the two copies must include all required forms, certifications,
assurances, and appendices, be signed by an authorized representative,
have original signatures, and be submitted unbound.
Each application must contain the following items in the order
listed:
Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424). Follow the
instructions below and those that accompany the form.
In Item 5 of Form 424, put DUNS number in ``Organizational DUNS:''
box.
In Item 5 of Form 424, include name, phone number, and, if
available, email and fax numbers of the contact person.
In Item 8 of Form 424, check `New.'
In Item 10 of Form 424, clearly identify the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) program title and number for the program for
which funds are being requested as stated in this funding opportunity
announcement.
In Item 11 of Form 424, identify the single funding opportunity the
application addresses.
In Item 12 of Form 424, identify the specific geographic area to be
served.
In Item 14 of Form 424, identify Congressional districts of both
the applicant and project.
Budget Information Non-Construction Programs (Form 424A) and Budget
Justification
Follow the instructions provided here and those in Section V.
Application Review Information.
If applicable, applicants must include a completed SPOC
certification (Single Point of Contact) with the date of the SPOC
contact entered in line 16, page 1 of the Form 424.
Proof of non-profit status (if applicable). Please see Section
III.3 Other Eligibility for ways to demonstrate non-profit status.
Indirect cost rate agreement. If claiming indirect costs, provide
documentation that applicant currently has an indirect cost rate
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or
another cognizant Federal agency.
Letters of agreement and memoranda of understanding. If applicable,
include a letter of commitment or Memorandum of Understanding from each
partner and/or sub-contractor describing their role, detailing specific
tasks to be performed, and expressing commitment to participate if the
proposed project is funded.
General Content and Form Information
The application limit is 75 pages total including all forms and
attachments. Pages over this page limit will be removed from the
application and will not be reviewed.
To be considered for funding, each application must be submitted
with the Standard Federal Forms (provided at the end of this
announcement or through the electronic links provided) and following
the guidance provided. The application must be signed by an individual
authorized to act for the applicant agency and to assume responsibility
for the obligations imposed by the terms and conditions of the grant
award.
The application must be typed, double spaced, printed on only one
side, with at least \1/2\ inch margins on each side and 1 inch at the
top and bottom, using standard 12 Point fonts (such as Times New Roman
or Courier). Pages must be numbered.
All copies of an application must be submitted in a single package,
and a separate package must be submitted for each funding opportunity.
The package must be clearly labeled for the specific funding
opportunity it is addressing.
Because each application will be duplicated, do not use or include
separate covers, binders, clips, tabs, plastic inserts, maps,
brochures, or any other items that cannot be processed easily on a
photocopy machine with an automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple, or
fasten in any way separate subsections of the application, including
supporting documentation; however, each complete copy must be stapled
securely in the upper left corner. Applicants are advised that the
copies of the application submitted, not the original, will be
reproduced by the Federal government for review.
Tips for Preparing a Competitive Application. It is essential that
applicants read the entire announcement package carefully before
preparing an application and include all of the required application
forms and attachments. The application must reflect a thorough
understanding of the purpose and objectives of the applicable
legislation. Reviewers expect applicants to understand the goals of the
legislation and the Children's Bureau's interest in each topic. A
``responsive application'' is one that addresses all of the evaluation
criteria in ways that demonstrate this understanding. Applications that
are considered to be ``unresponsive'' generally receive very low scores
and are rarely funded.
The Children's Bureau's Web site (https://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/
cb) provides a wide range of information and links to other relevant
Web sites. Before you begin preparing an application, we suggest that
you learn more about the mission and programs of the Children's Bureau
by exploring the Web site.
Organizing Your Application. The specific evaluation criteria in
Section V of this funding announcement will be used to review and
evaluate each application. The applicant should address each of these
specific evaluation criteria in the project description. Applicants
should organize their project description in this sequence: (1)
Objectives and Need for Assistance; (2) Approach; (3) Organizational
Profiles; (4) Budget and Budget Justification; and should use the same
headings as these criteria, so that reviewers can readily find
information that directly addresses each of the specific review
criteria.
[[Page 38961]]
Project Evaluation Plan. Project evaluations are very important. If
you do not have the in-house capacity to conduct an objective,
comprehensive evaluation of the project, then the Children's Bureau
advises that you propose contracting with a third-party evaluator
specializing in social science or evaluation, or a university or
college, to conduct the evaluation. A skilled evaluator can assist you
in designing a data collection strategy that is appropriate for the
evaluation of your proposed project. Additional assistance may be found
in a document titled ``Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation.'' A copy
of this document can be accessed at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/
opre/other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/reports/pmguide/pmguide_toc.html.
Logic Model. A logic model is a tool that presents the conceptual
framework for a proposed project and explains the linkages among
program elements. While there are many versions of the logic model,
they generally summarize the logical connections among the needs that
are the focus of the project, project goals and objectives, the target
population, project inputs (resources), the proposed activities/
processes/outputs directed toward the target population, the expected
short- and long-term outcomes the initiative is designed to achieve,
and the evaluation plan for measuring the extent to which proposed
processes and outcomes actually occur. Information on the development
of logic models is available on the Internet at https://www.uwex.edu/
ces/pdande/, or https://www.extension.iastate.edu/cyfar/capbuilding/
outcome/outcome_logicmdir.html.
Use of Human Subjects. If your evaluation plan includes gathering
data from or about clients, there are specific procedures which must be
followed in order to protect their privacy and ensure the
confidentiality of the information about them. Applicants planning to
gather such data are asked to describe their plans regarding an
Institutional Review Board (IRB) review. If applicable, applicants must
include a completed Form 310, Protection of Human Subjects. For more
information about use of human subjects and IRB's you can visit these
Web sites: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/
decisioncharts.htm, https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/assurance/
OF310.rtf, https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_chapter2.htm#d2, and http:/
/www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/ictips.htm.
You may submit your application to us in either electronic or paper
format. To submit an application electronically, please use the https://
www.Grants.gov/Apply site. If you use Grants.gov, you will be able to
download a copy of the application package, complete it off-line, and
then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov site. ACF
will not accept grant applications via e-mail or facsimile
transmission.
Please note the following if you plan to submit your application
electronically via Grants.gov:
Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly
encouraged.
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation. We strongly recommend that you
do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the
application process through Grants.gov.
We recommend you visit Grants.gov at least 30 days prior
to filing your application to fully understand the process and
requirements. We encourage applicants who submit electronically to
submit well before the closing date and time so that if difficulties
are encountered an applicant can still send in a hard copy overnight.
If you encounter difficulties, please contact the Grants.gov Help Desk
at 1-800-518-4276 to report the problem and obtain assistance with the
system.
To use Grants.gov, you, as the applicant, must have a DUNS
Number and register in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). You
should allow a minimum of five days to complete the CCR registration.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit a grant application in electronic format, nor will we penalize
you if you submit an application in paper format.
You may submit all documents electronically, including all
information typically included on the SF 424 and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
Your application must comply with any page limitation
requirements described in this program announcement.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgement from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The Administration for Children and
Families will retrieve your application from Grants.gov.
We may request that you provide original signatures on
forms at a later date.
You may access the electronic application for this program
on www.Grants.gov.
You must search for the downloadable application package
by the CFDA number.
Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with
their applications the survey located under ``Grant Related Documents
and Forms,'' ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Applicants,''
titled, ``Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants,'' at:
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Standard Forms and Certifications
The project description should include all the information
requirements described in the specific evaluation criteria outlined in
the program announcement under Section V Application Review
Information. In addition to the project description, the applicant
needs to complete all the standard forms required for making
applications for awards under this announcement.
Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement
must file the Standard Form (SF) 424, Application for Federal
Assistance; SF-424A, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs; SF-
424B, Assurances--Non-Construction Programs. The forms may be
reproduced for use in submitting applications. Applicants must sign and
return the standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish prior to award an executed copy of the
Standard Form LLL, Certification Regarding Lobbying, when applying for
an award in excess of $100,000. Applicants who have used non-Federal
funds for lobbying activities in connection with receiving assistance
under this announcement shall complete a disclosure form, if
applicable, with their applications (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control number 0348-0046). Applicants must
sign and return the certification with their application.
Applicants must also understand they will be held accountable for
the smoking prohibition included within Public Law 103-227, Title XII
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also known as the PRO-KIDS Act of 1994). A
copy of the Federal Register notice which implements the smoking
prohibition is included with forms. By signing and submitting the
application, applicants are providing the certification and need not
mail back the certification with the application.
Applicants must make the appropriate certification of their
compliance with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. By
signing and submitting the applications, applicants
[[Page 38962]]
are providing the certification and need not mail back the
certification form. Complete the standard forms and the associated
certifications and assurances based on the instructions on the forms.
The forms and certifications may be found at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Those organizations required to provide proof of non-profit status,
please refer to Section III.3.
Please see Section V.1, for instructions on preparing the full
project description.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Explanation of Due Dates
The closing time and date for receipt of applications is 4:30 p.m.
(Eastern Time Zone) on the date noted above. Mailed or hand carried
applications received after 4:30 p.m. on the closing date will be
classified as late.
Deadline: Mailed applications shall be considered as meeting an
announced deadline if they are received on or before the deadline time
and date at the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.,
ATTN: Children's Bureau, 118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC 20002-2132.
Applicants are responsible for mailing applications well in advance,
when using all mail services, to ensure that the applications are
received on or before the deadline time and date.
Applications handcarried by applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers
shall be considered as meeting an announced deadline if they are
received on or before the deadline date, between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., EST, at the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon Group,
Inc., ATTN: Children's Bureau, 118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC 20002-
2132, between Monday and Friday (excluding Federal holidays). This
address must appear on the envelope/package containing the application
with the note. Applicants are cautioned that express/overnight mail
services do not always deliver as agreed.
Late applications: Applications which do not meet the criteria
above are considered late applications. ACF shall notify each late
applicant that its application will not be considered in the current
competition. Any application received after 4:30 pm on the deadline
date will not be considered for competition. Applicants using express/
overnight mail services should allow two working days prior to the
deadline date for receipt of applications. (Applicants are cautioned
that express/overnight mail services do not always deliver as agreed).
Extension of deadlines: ACF may extend application deadlines when
circumstances such as acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur, or
when there are widespread disruptions of mail service, or in other rare
cases. A determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests
with the Chief Grants Management Officer.
Applicants will not be sent acknowledgements of received
applications.
Checklist:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What to submit Required content Required form or format When to submit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Abstract...................... See Section IV and V...................... Format described in By application due date.
Section IV and V.
Project Narrative..................... See Section IV and V...................... Format described in By application due date.
Section IV and V.
SF424................................. See Section IV............................ Format described in By application due date.
Section IV.
SF424A................................ See Section IV............................ Format described in By application due date.
Section IV.
SF424B................................ See Section IV............................ Format described in By application due date.
Section IV.
Assurances and Certifications......... See Section IV............................ Format described in By Time of Award.
Section IV.
Proof of Non-profit status, if See Section III and IV.................... Format described in By Time of Award.
applicable. Section III.
Indirect Cost rate Agreement, if See Section IV............................ Format described in IV.. By Time of Award.
applicable.
Letters of commitment from partner See Section IV............................ Format described in IV.. By Time of Award.
organizations, if applicable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Forms: Private, nonprofit organizations are encouraged
to submit with their applications the survey located under ``Grant
Related Documents and Forms'' titled ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit
Grant Applicants'' at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What to submit Required content Required form or format When to submit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Per required form......................... May be found on https:// With application.
Applicants. www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Intergovernmental Review
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under Executive Order 12372,
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,'' and 45 CFR Part 100,
``Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services
Programs and Activities.'' Under the Order, States may design their own
processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed Federal assistance
under covered programs.
As of October 1, 2004, the following jurisdictions have elected to
participate in the Executive Order process: Arkansas, California,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa,
Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New
Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa, Guam,
North Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. As these
jurisdictions have elected to participate in the Executive Order
process, they have established SPOCs. Applicants from participating
jurisdictions should contact their SPOC, as soon as possible, to alert
them of prospective applications and receive instructions. Applicants
must submit all required materials, if any, to the SPOC and indicate
the date of this submittal (or the date of contact if no submittal is
required) on the Standard Form 424, item 16a. Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2).
A SPOC has 60 days from the application deadline to comment on
proposed new or competing continuation awards. SPOCs are
[[Page 38963]]
encouraged to eliminate the submission of routine endorsements as
official recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs are requested to clearly
differentiate between mere advisory comments and those official State
process recommendations which may trigger the ``accommodate or
explain'' rule.
When comments are submitted directly to ACF, they should be
addressed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Grants Management,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 4th
floor, Washington, DC 20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions have chosen not to participate
in the process, entities that meet the eligibility requirements of the
program are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a State,
Territory, Commonwealth, etc. does not have a SPOC. Therefore,
applicants from these jurisdictions, or for projects administered by
Federally-recognized Indian Tribes, need take no action in regard to
E.O. 12372.
The official list, including addresses, of the jurisdictions
elected to participate in E.O. 12372 can be found on the following URL:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
5. Funding Restrictions
Grant awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Construction is not an allowable activity or expenditure under this
solicitation.
Applicants should note that grants to be awarded under this program
announcement are subject to the availability of funds. The size of the
actual awards will vary.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Submission by Mail: An Application must provide an original
application with all attachments, signed by an authorized
representative and two copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an
explanation of due dates. Applications should be mailed to: ACYF
Operations Center, The Dixon Group, 118 Q St. NE., Washington DC, DC
20002-2132, Attention: Children's Bureau.
Hand Delivery: An Applicant must provide an original application
with all attachments signed by an authorized representative and two
copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an explanation of due dates.
Applications should be delivered to: ACYF Operations Center, The Dixon
Group, 118 Q St. NE., Washington DC 20002-2132, Attention: Children's
Bureau.
Electronic Submission: https://www.grants.gov Please see section IV.
2 Content and Form of Application Submission, for guidelines and
requirements when submitting applications electronically.
V. Application Review Information
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 40 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed and
reviewing the collection information.
The project description is approved under OMB control number 0970-
0139 which expires 4/30/2007.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The following are instructions and guidelines on how to prepare the
``Project Summary/Abstract'' and ``Full Project Description'' sections
of the application. Under the evaluation criteria section, note that
each criterion is preceded by the generic evaluation requirement under
the ACF Uniform Project Description (UPD).
1. Criteria
General Instructions
ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions
that focus on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended
performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of
substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits are
not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than repetition.
Supporting information concerning activities that will not be directly
funded by the grant or information that does not directly pertain to an
integral part of the grant funded activity should be placed in an
appendix. Pages should be numbered and a table of contents should be
included for easy reference.
Introduction
Applicants required to submit a full project description shall
prepare the project description statement in accordance with the
following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation
criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what your project
description should include while the evaluation criteria identifies the
measures that will be used to evaluate applications.
Project Summary/Abstract
Provide a summary of the project description (a page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
Objectives and Need for Assistance
Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial,
institutional, and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need
for assistance must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate
objectives of the project must be clearly stated; supporting
documentation, such as letters of support and testimonials from
concerned interests other than the applicant, may be included. Any
relevant data based on planning studies should be included or referred
to in the endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate demographic data and
participant/beneficiary information, as needed. In developing the
project description, the applicant may volunteer or be requested to
provide information on the total range of projects currently being
conducted and supported (or to be initiated), some of which may be
outside the scope of the program announcement.
Approach
Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how
the proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or
activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might
accelerate or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the
proposed approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of
the project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in
cost or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement.
Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the
accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such
terms as the number of people to be served and the number of activities
accomplished.
When accomplishments cannot be quantified by activity or function,
list them in chronological order to show the schedule of
accomplishments and their target dates. If any data is to be collected,
maintained, and/or disseminated, clearance may be required from the
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This clearance pertains to
any ``collection of information that is conducted or sponsored by
ACF.'' List organizations, cooperating entities, consultants, or other
key individuals who will work on the project along with a short
description of the nature of their effort or contribution.
[[Page 38964]]
Organizational Profiles
Provide information on the applicant organization(s) and
cooperating partners, such as organizational charts, financial
statements, audit reports or statements from CPAs/Licensed Public
Accountants, Employer Identification Numbers, names of bond carriers,
contact persons and telephone numbers, child care licenses and other
documentation of professional accreditation, information on compliance
with Federal/State/local government standards, documentation of
experience in the program area, and other pertinent information. If the
applicant is a non-profit organization, submit proof of non-profit
status in its application. The non-profit agency can accomplish this by
providing: (a) A reference to the applicant organization's listing in
the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt
organizations described in the IRS Code; (b) a copy of a currently
valid IRS tax exemption certificate, (c) a statement from a State
taxing body, State attorney general, or other appropriate State
official certifying that the applicant organization has a non-profit
status and that none of the net earnings accrue to any private
shareholders or individuals; (d) a certified copy of the organization's
certificate of incorporation or similar document that clearly
establishes non-profit status, (e) any of the items immediately above
for a State or national parent organization and a statement signed by
the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local non-
profit affiliate.
Budget and Budget Justification
Provide a budget with line item detail and detailed calculations
for each budget object class identified on the Budget Information form.
Detailed calculations must include estimation methods, quantities, unit
costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the
calculation to be duplicated. Also include a breakout by the funding
sources identified in Block 15 of the SF-424. Provide a narrative
budget justification that describes how the categorical costs are
derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness, and allocability of the
proposed costs.
General
Use the following guidelines for preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and non-Federal resources shall be detailed
and justified in the budget and narrative justification. ``Federal
resources'' refers only to the ACF grant for which you are applying.
``Non Federal resources'' are all other Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget amounts and computations be
presented in a columnar format: First column, object class categories;
second column, Federal budget; next column(s), non-Federal budget(s),
and last column, total budget. The budget justification should be a
narrative.
Personnel
Description: Costs of employee salaries and wages. Justification:
Identify the project director or principal investigator, if known. For
each staff person, provide the title, time commitment to the project
(in months), time commitment to the project (as a percentage or full-
time equivalent), annual salary, grant salary, wage rates, etc. Do not
include the costs of consultants or personnel costs of delegate
agencies or of specific project(s) or businesses to be financed by the
applicant.
Fringe Benefits
Description: Costs of employee fringe benefits unless treated as
part of an approved indirect cost rate. Justification: Provide a
breakdown of the amounts and percentages that comprise fringe benefit
costs such as health insurance, FICA, retirement insurance, taxes, etc.
Travel
Description: Costs of project-related travel by employees of the
applicant organization (does not include costs of consultant travel).
Justification: For each trip, show the total number of traveler(s),
travel destination, duration of trip, per diem, mileage allowances, if
privately owned vehicles will be used, and other transportation costs
and subsistence allowances. Travel costs for key staff to attend ACF-
sponsored workshops should be detailed in the budget.
Equipment
Description: ``Equipment'' means an article of nonexpendable,
tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year
and an acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of (a) the
capitalization level established by the organization for the financial
statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note: Acquisition cost means the
net invoice unit price of an item of equipment, including the cost of
any modifications, attachments, accessories, or auxiliary apparatus
necessary to make it usable for the purpose for which it is acquired.
Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty, protective in-transit
insurance, freight, and installation shall be included in or excluded
from acquisition cost in accordance with the organization's regular
written accounting practices.) Justification: For each type of
equipment requested, provide a description of the equipment, the cost
per unit, the number of units, the total cost, and a plan for use on
the project, as well as use or disposal of the equipment after the
project ends. An applicant organization that uses its own definition
for equipment should provide a copy of its policy or section of its
policy which includes the equipment definition.
Supplies
Description: Costs of all tangible personal property other than
that included under the Equipment category. Justification: Specify
general categories of supplies and their costs. Show computations and
provide other information which supports the amount requested.
Contractual
Description: Costs of all contracts for services and goods except
for those that belong under other categories such as equipment,
supplies, construction, etc. Include third party evaluation contracts
(if applicable) and contracts with secondary recipient organizations,
including delegate agencies and specific project(s) or businesses to be
financed by the applicant. Justification: Demonstrate that all
procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner to provide, to
the maximum extent practical, open and free competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are required to use Part 92
procedures, must justify any anticipated procurement action that is
expected to be awarded without competition and exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold fixed at 41 U.S.C. 403(11) (currently set at
$100,000).
Recipients might be required to make available to ACF pre-award
review and procurement documents, such as request for proposals or
invitations for bids, independent cost estimates, etc. Note: Whenever
the applicant intends to delegate part of the project to another
agency, the applicant must provide a detailed budget and budget
narrative for each delegate agency, by agency title, along with the
required supporting information referred to in these instructions.
Other
Enter the total of all other costs. Such costs, where applicable
and appropriate, may include but are not limited to
[[Page 38965]]
insurance, food, medical and dental costs (noncontractual),
professional services costs, space and equipment rentals, printing and
publication, computer use, training costs, such as tuition and
stipends, staff development costs, and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a narrative description and a
justification for each cost under this category.
Indirect Charges
Description: Total amount of indirect costs. This category should
be used only when the applicant currently has an indirect cost rate
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or
another cognizant Federal agency. Justification: An applicant that will
charge indirect costs to the grant must enclose a copy of the current
rate agreement. If the applicant organization is in the process of
initially developing or renegotiating a rate, upon notification that an
award will be made, it should immediately develop a tentative indirect
cost rate proposal based on its most recently completed fiscal year, in
accordance with the cognizant agency's guidelines for establishing
indirect cost rates, and submit it to the cognizant agency. Applicants
awaiting approval of their indirect cost proposals may also request
indirect costs. When an indirect cost rate is requested, those costs
included in the indirect cost pool should not also be charged as direct
costs to the grant. Also, if the applicant is requesting a rate which
is less than what is allowed under the program, the authorized
representative of the applicant organization must submit a signed
acknowledgement that the applicant is accepting a lower rate than
allowed.
Evaluation Criteria
The following evaluation criteria appear in weighted descending
order. The corresponding score values indicate the relative importance
that ACF places on each evaluation criterion; however, applicants need
not develop their applications precisely according to the order
presented. Application components may be organized such that a reviewer
will be able to follow a seamless and logical flow of information (e.g.
from a broad overview of the project to more detailed information about
how it will be conducted.
In considering how applicants will carry out the responsibilities
addressed under this announcement, competing applications for financial
assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the following
criteria:
Approach--50 Points
In reviewing the approach, the following factors will be
considered: (50 points)
1. The extent to which there is a sound timeline for effectively
implementing the proposed project, including major milestones and
target dates.
2. The extent to which the proposed project would enhance policy,
improve practice, and advance science in child maltreatment research.
The extent to which the proposed project would be significant to the
field of child welfare researchers.
3. The extent to which the proposed project would contribute to the
overall effort to improve the safety, permanence and well-being of
children and address particular outcome measures, as applicable.
4. The extent to which the applicant identifies relevant barriers
and problems associated with a national archive and proposes effective
solutions to these problems.
5. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates an awareness of
current activities being undertaken in the field of archiving and
describes how the approach being proposed would effectively build on
this work. The extent to which the proposed project would be different
from previous efforts in ways that improve processes and results.
6. The extent to which the proposed project would reflect cultural
sensitivity to the issues being addressed.
7. The extent to which the proposed project would address the
issues related to the particular challenges of archiving and
confidentiality, including the strengths and weaknesses of possible
strategies that address masking individual identifiers, and user
agreements that particularly address protections for confidentiality
and limit liability. The extent to which the proposed project would
explain the relationship between archiving and the protection of human
subjects, informed consent, protection from research risks, and
Institutional Review Boards (IRB) in general. The extent to which the
proposed project would address the relationship of the funded archive
to Institutional Review Boards and the Department of Health and Human
Services Office for Protection from Research Risks and Certificates of
Confidentiality, specifically.
8. The extent to which the proposed project would address the
strengths and weaknesses of possible strategies that deal with limited,
hierarchical, or controlled access and user agreements that
particularly address confidentiality and liability. The extent to which
the applicant discusses a variety of models for delimiting access and
the impact of fee structures related to access and proposes
recommendations regarding access controls for the proposed activity.
9. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates an ability to
gain access to necessary information, data sets, and data bases, as
applicable, and delineates a sound plan for addressing any ethical
issues that may arise in the use of these data sets.
10. The extent to which the application effectively addresses the
uses and merits of an advisory committee.
11. The extent to which there are sound strategies for
dissemination of products and reports that would be of use to other
researchers and practitioners in the field.
12. The extent to which the applicant proposes a sound strategy for
providing supplementary support to data users who access National
Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) data through the
National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect during Year 1.
Organizational Profiles--20 Points
In reviewing the organizational profiles, the following factors
will be considered: (20 points)
1. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates strong
organizational experience specifically related to archiving, and its
sub-tasks, and conducting child maltreatment and child welfare
research. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates a sound
working knowledge of ACF data collection activities related to the data
archive. The extent to which each participating university or agency
partner possesses the organizational capabilities required for
implementation of this activity.
2. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates sufficient
resources and the appropriate facilities to undertake the project.
3. The extent to which the proposed project director and key
project staff possess sufficient relevant knowledge, experience and the
capabilities to implement and manage a project of this size, scope and
complexity effectively (e.g., resumes). The extent to which the roles,
responsibilities and time commitments of each proposed project staff
position, including consultants, subcontractors and/or partners, are
clearly defined and appropriate to the successful implementation of the
proposed project with respect to
[[Page 38966]]
developing and maintaining a national archive on child welfare and
child abuse and neglect data.
The extent to which there is a sound management plan for achieving
the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget,
including clearly defined responsibilities, for accomplishing project
tasks and ensuring quality. The extent to which the plan clearly
describes the effective management and coordination of activities
carried out by any partners, subcontractors and consultants (if
appropriate). The extent to which there would be a mutually beneficial
relationship between the proposed project and other work planned,
anticipated or underway with Federal assistance by the applicant.
Objectives and Need for Assistance--20 Points
In reviewing the objectives and need for assistance, the following
factors will be considered: (20 points)
1. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates an understanding
of the general need for archiving, and specifically, the need for
archiving the Children's Bureau (CB) child welfare and child abuse and
neglect data. The extent to which the application clearly describes
specific measurable objectives.
2. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates an awareness of
current initiatives in the field of child maltreatment and archiving
and clearly describes how the approach being proposed would address
both.
3. The extent to which the applicant discusses current issues in
archiving including but not limited to topics such as the world wide
web, dissemination strategies, liability, and terms of use agreements.
4. The extent to which the applicant clearly describes the audience
of users of the data archive, provides a reasonable estimate of their
number and describes their needs.
Budget and Budget Justification--10 Points
In reviewing the budget and budget justification, the following
factors will be considered: (10 points)
1. The extent to which the costs of the proposed project are
reasonable and appropriate in view of the activities to be conducted
and expected results and benefits.
2. The extent to which the applicant's fiscal controls and
accounting procedures would ensure prudent use, proper and timely
disbursement and accurate accounting of funds received under the
program announcement.
2. Review and Selection Process
Since ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the review
process, applicants have the option of omitting from the application
copies (not the original) of specific salary rates or amounts for
individuals specified in the application budget.
No grant award will be made under this announcement on the basis of
an incomplete application.
When the Operations Center receives your application it will be
screened to confirm that your application was received by the deadline.
Federal staff will verify that you are an eligible applicant and that
the application contains all the essential elements. Applications
received from ineligible organizations and applications received after
the deadline will be withdrawn from further consideration.
A panel of at least three reviewers (primarily experts from outside
the Federal government) will use the evaluation criteria described in
this announcement to evaluate each application. The reviewers will
determine the strengths and weaknesses of each application, provide
comments about the strengths and weaknesses and give each application a
numerical score.
The results of the competitive review are a primary factor in
making funding decisions. In addition, Federal staff conducts
administrat