Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau, 35087-35097 [05-11920]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
Management Analysis and Services Office,
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92–463.
Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will
include the review, discussion, and
evaluation of applications received in
response to: Health Promotion and Disease
Prevention Research Centers: Special Interest
Project Competitive Supplements, Program
Announcement Number (PA) DP–04–003A.
Contact Person for More Information:
Gwendolyn H. Cattledge, Ph.D., MSEP,
Scientific Review Administrator, National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford
Highway, NE, Mailstop K–02, Atlanta, GA
30341, Telephone (770) 488–4655.
The Director, Management Analysis and
Services Office, has been delegated the
authority to sign Federal Register notices
pertaining to announcements of meetings and
other committee management activities, for
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Dated: June 8, 2005.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, , Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05–11878 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Notice of Correction for the
Discretionary Funds for Projects To
Establish Individual Development
Account (IDA) Programs for Refugees
Administration for Children
and Families, ACF, DHHS.
ACTION: Notice of correction.
The omitted footnote in the Executive
Summary should state: Refugee [1]
[1] Eligibility for refugee social
services includes: (1) Refugees; (2)
asylees; (3) Cuban and Haitian entrants
under section 501 of the Refugee
Education Assistance Act of 1980 (Pub.
L. 96–422); (4) certain Amerasians from
Vietnam who are admitted to the U.S. as
immigrants under section 584 of the
Foreign Operations, Export Financing,
and Related Programs Appropriations
Act, as included in the FY 1988
Continuing Resolution (Pub. L. 100–
202); (5) certain Amerasians from
Vietnam who are U.S. citizens under
Title II of the Foreign Operations,
Export Financing, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act of 1989 (Pub. L.
100–461), 1990 (Pub. L. 101–167), and
1991 (Pub. L. 101–513); and (6) victims
of a severe form of trafficking who
receive certification or eligibility letters
from ORR (see 45 CFR 400.43 and ORR
State Letters Number 01–13 as modified
by Number 02–01 and Number 04–12 on
trafficking victims). For convenience,
the term ‘‘refugee’’ is used in this notice
to encompass all such eligible persons.
Additional information on eligibility is
available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs /orr/policy/sl01–13.htm and
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs /orr/
policy/sl02–01.htm.
Dated: June 18, 2005.
Nguyen Van Hanh,
Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement.
[FR Doc. 05–11831 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am]
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Administration on Children, Youth and
Families, Children’s Bureau
Funding Opportunity Title: Training
of Child Welfare Agency Supervisors in
the Effective Delivery and Management
of Federal Independent Living Service
for Youth in Foster Care
Announcement Type: Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2005–ACF–ACYF–CW–0009.
CFDA Number: 93.556.
Due Date for Applications: August 5,
2005.
Category of Funding Activity: Social
Services and Income Security.
Executive Summary: The Children’s
Bureau announces the availability of
funds and requests applications to
develop, implement, evaluate and
disseminate a training curriculum for
public child welfare agency supervisors.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
This curriculum will strengthen
supervision of staff interventions with
older youth who are in foster care and/
or in independent living programs.
These youth, mostly ages 16 to 21, need
assistance in making a successful
transition to adulthood, as well as
achieving self-sufficiency to avoid longterm dependency on the social welfare
system.
These youth often face decisions with
regard to personal housing,
transportation, employment and
education. They need workers who can
guide them and who understand these
challenges. The target youth also need
workers who have a working knowledge
of adolescent transition programs. ‘‘In
the continuing work of the Muskie
School of Public Service, University of
Southern Maine and National Resource
Center for Youth Services, College of
Continuing Education University of
Oklahoma, four core principles have
emerged as essential in order for
adolescent transitional living programs
to be successful.’’ It is the thinking of
current experts in the field that
programs for youth are more likely to be
successful when these four principles
are incorporated into the program
design regardless of the type of services
provided. The principles are:
(1) Positive youth development;
(2) Collaboration;
(3) Cultural competence; and
(4) Permanent connections.
Priority Area 1
I. Funding Opportunity Description
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
AGENCY:
Funding Opportunity Title:
Discretionary Funds for Projects to
Establish Individual Development
Account (IDA) Programs for Refugees.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHs–
2005–ACF–ORR–ZI–0093.
SUMMARY: This notice is to inform
interested parties of clarifications made
to the Discretionary Funds for Projects
to Establish Individual Development
Account (IDA) Programs for Refugees
published on Monday, June 6, 2005. The
following clarifications should be noted:
Section IV.3 stated the following:
• ‘‘3. Submission Dates and Times
Due Date for Applications: August 5,
2005.’’
The language in section IV.3 is
replaced with:
• ‘‘3. Submission Dates and Times
Due Date for Applications: July 21,
2005.’’
Executive Summary: A footnote was
omitted in relation to the word
‘‘refugee’’.
35087
Sfmt 4703
The Children’s Bureau announces the
availability of funds and requests
applications to develop, implement,
evaluate and disseminate a training
curriculum for public child welfare
agency supervisors. This curriculum
will strengthen supervision of staffs’
interventions with older youth who are
in foster care and/or in independent
living programs. These youth, mostly
age 16 to 21, need assistance in making
a successful transition to adulthood, as
well as help in avoiding long-term
dependency on the social welfare
system.
These youth often face decisions with
regard to personal housing,
transportation, employment and
education. They need workers who can
guide them and who understand these
challenges. The target youth also need
workers who have a working knowledge
of adolescent transition programs. ‘‘In
the continuing work of the Muskie
School of Public Service, University of
Southern Maine and National Resource
Center for Youth Services, College of
Continuing Education University of
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
35088
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
Oklahoma, four core principles have
emerged as essential in order for
adolescent transitional living programs
to be successful.’’ It is the thinking of
current experts in the field that
programs for youth are more likely to be
successful when these four principles
are incorporated into the program
design regardless of the type of services
provided. The principles are:
(1) Positive youth development;
(2) Collaboration;
(3) Cultural competence; and
(4) Permanent connections.
For more information on these
principles contact the University of
Oklahoma, National Resource Center for
Youth Services at https://
www.nrcys.ou.edu.
Child welfare supervisors must ensure
that child welfare workers understand
and utilize:
(1) Positive youth development
philosophy;
(2) Client assessment;
(3) Age-appropriate intervention
planning; and
(4) Implementation and evaluation of
individualized Independent Living
Program (ILP) training and program
activities.
Training based on the curriculum
should increase child welfare
supervisor’s ability to supervise a
worker in:
(1) Assessing a youth’s readiness for
ILP services, support and training;
(2) Identifying culturally competent
ILP program services and activities;
(3) Utilizing positive youth
development principles for involving
youth in decisionmaking,
implementation and evaluation of
training and program activities;
(4) Identifying areas of stress and its
impact on youth in foster care;
(5) Working with youth to help them
deal with crisis situations and to assess
the results of the intervention;
(6) Working with youth to develop
and maintain permanent connections;
and
(7) Collaborating with both inter- and
intra-agency resource people to achieve
positive outcomes for youth
transitioning to adulthood.
Background
In December 1999, Congress passed
new independent living legislation, the
John H. Chaffee Foster Care
Independence Program which amended
the original Federal Independent Living
Program (section 477 of the Social
Security Act). The new program
provides States with increased funding
and flexibility to help youth make the
transition from foster care to selfsufficiency. Currently all 50 States,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia
have an ILP. Services and activities
include educational and employment
assistance, training in basic living skills
(budgeting, housekeeping, food
shopping, building and maintaining
positive social relationships),
counseling, housing, case management
and outreach services. The new
legislation allows the use of these funds
for additional activities including room
and board, age-appropriate services to
youth younger than 16, post-secondary
educational assistance and preventive
health activities.
In addition, the Adoption and Safe
Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) has had
considerable impact on child welfare
practice and how the goals of safety,
permanency and well-being of youth
must be accomplished. Thus, there is a
need to refocus attention on practice
approaches that give attention, as
appropriate, to reunification with the
biological parents, adoption, placement,
or other alternative approaches to
permanency for youth of all ages. For
many older foster care youth, even if
they can spend time with family
members, their chances for a successful
transition to adulthood are greatly
improved if they learn to count on
themselves to address their daily
challenges, and if they have the
knowledge, skills and experience to do
so.
Older youth in foster care need
special help and support. As of
September 30, 2002 there were an
estimated 533,897 children in
substitute/foster care. Of these children
an estimated 39 percent were identified
as being 13 years of age or older
(AFCARS—Adoption and Foster Care
Analysis and Reporting System—data as
of October 2003). Approximately 20,000
youth age out of the system every year.
These young people often have histories
of significant abuse, neglect and
multiple foster care placements. They
often find themselves completely on
their own after discharge, with few, if
any, financial resources; limited
education, training and employment
options; no safe place to live; and little
or no support from family, friends and
community. A focus on the four core
principles for these youth is crucial. The
permanent connections work to help
ground the youth in the community and
provide a support system that these
traumatized youth often lack.
Collaborations help to ensure that a full
array of services is available to the
youth during and after their transition
from care. A focus on positive youth
development allows the youth to have
the daily living skills needed to function
on their own along with the knowledge
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to maintain their emotional health.
Through the provision of culturally
competent services, the agencies ensure
that youth feel protected and connected
in their environment.
Training of child welfare supervisors
has predominantly focused on
supervising staff to meet generalized
permanency needs while focusing on
the family as a whole. Most of this work
is still done in the context of familycentered services that build on family
strengths and meet family needs. There
is limited attention given to assessing
problem situations from the youth’s
perspective and preparing a youth for
independence and/or transitioning out
of foster care. This training would focus
on strategies for supervising the child
welfare worker in how to identify the
specific needs of these youth and
develop a plan for achieving goals to
meet those needs regardless of other
permanency work being done in the
family unit.
Specialized skills are essential to
work effectively with older youth. Child
welfare supervisors need training to
understand youth development
principles and strategies, to focus on
giving young people age-appropriate
opportunities to exercise leadership,
build skills, and become involved in the
decision-making about their future.
In January 2000, DHHS established
the Child and Family Service Reviews
(CFSR) that have enhanced monitoring
of State child welfare programs.
Previous approaches had not allowed
for states to learn from their mistakes
and make improvements accordingly.
Meetings with stakeholders during
CFSR indicate that foster parents,
guardians and other primary care
providers need youth development
training. In addition, state agency staff
need training and technical assistance
in assisting youth in developing their
case plan, and developing life-long
connections that will assist them with
permanency. Results of the 2002
reviews indicate that all of the states
were found to need improvement in
involving the family in case planning,
assessing needs and providing services.
In the fall of 2000, the Children’s
Bureau awarded twelve grants for
Independent Living Training for Child
Welfare practitioners. One finding of
these recently completed projects is that
Child Welfare supervisors needed
training on youth development to
understand the unique developmental
and service needs of youth in care in
order to support caseworker efforts.
The Children’s Bureau recognizes the
need to involve young people in
decision-making and planning for a life
of independence. To accomplish this,
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
service providers must offer specialized,
age-appropriate support for these youth
as they transition to adulthood. Training
implemented under this program will
provide child welfare supervisors with
the training and tools needed to assist
child welfare workers to help move
their older youth through a successful
transition to independence and
achieving self-sufficiency.
Projects funded under this
announcement will be expected to:
1. Have the project fully functioning
within 90 days following the
notification of the grant award.
2. Participate if the Children’s Bureau
chooses to do a national evaluation or
a technical assistance contract that
relates to this funding announcement.
3. Submit all performance indicator
data, program and financial reports in a
timely manner, in recommended format
(to be provided), and submit the final
report on disk or electronically using a
standard word-processing program.
4. Submit a copy of the final report,
the evaluation report, and any program
products to the National Clearinghouse
on Child Abuse and Neglect
Information, 330 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20447, within 90 days
of project end date. This is in addition
to the standard requirement that the
final program and evaluation report
must also be submitted to the Grants
Management Specialist and the Federal
Project Officer.
5. Allocate sufficient funds in the
budget to:
(a) Provide for the project director, the
evaluator and a child welfare
representative to attend an annual 3-day
grantees’ meeting in Washington, DC.
(b) Provide for the project director, the
evaluator and a child walfare
representative to attend an early kickoff
meeting for grantees funded under this
priority area to be held within the first
three months of the project (first year
only) in Washington, DC; and
(c) Provide for 10–15 percent of the
proposed budget to project evaluaton.
Legislative Authority
The Promoting Safe and Stable
Families Program (Section 430, Title IV–
B, subpart 2, of the Social Security Act)
(42 U.S.C. 629a)
II. Award Information
Funding Instrument Type: Grant.
Anticipated total priority area
funding: $1,000,000.
Anticipated number of awards: 0 to 4.
Average Projected Award Amount:
$250,000.
Length of Project Periods: 36 month
project with three 12 month budget
periods.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
35089
Other:
Explanation of other: The grant
amount will not exceed $250,000 in the
first budget period. The projects will be
awarded for a project period of 36
months. The initial grant award will be
for a 12-month budget period. The
award of continuation funding beyond
each 12-month budget period will be
subject to the availability of funds,
satisfactory progress on the part of the
grantee, and a determination that
continued funding would be in the best
interest of the Government.
Ceiling of Individual Awards per
budget period: $250,000.
Floor on amount of individual awards
None.
(based on an award of $250,000 per
budget period) must provide a match of
at least $83,333 (25 percent of the total
approved project costs). Grantees will be
held accountable for commitments of
non-Federal resources even if over the
amount of the required match. Failure to
provide the amount will result in
disallowance of Federal funds. Lack of
supporting documentation at the time of
application will not impact the
responsiveness of the application for
competitive review.
Cost-sharing will not be used as a
preference and/or evaluation criterion
in the review of applications.
III. Eligibility Information
All applicants must have a Dun &
Bradstreet number. On June 27, 2003 the
Office of Management and Budget
published in the Federal Register a new
Federal policy applicable to all Federal
grant applicants. The policy requires all
Federal grant applicants to provide a
Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number
when applying for Federal grants or
cooperative agreements on or after
October 1, 2003. The DUNS number will
be required whether an applicant is
submitting a paper application or using
the government-wide electronic portal
(www.Grants.gov). A DUNS number will
be required for every application for a
new award or renewal/continuation of
an award, including applications or
plans under formula, entitlement and
block grant programs, submitted on or
after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization
has a DUNS number. You may acquire
a DUNS number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS number
request line on 1–866–705–5711 or you
may request a number on-line at http:/
/www.dnb.com.
Non-profit organizations applying for
funding are required to submit proof of
their non-profit status.
Proof of non-profit status is any one
of the following:
• A reference to the applicant
organization’s listing in the Internal
Revenue Service’s (IRS) most recent list
of tax-exempt organizations described in
the IRS Code.
• A copy of a currently valid IRS tax
exemption certificate.
• A statement from a State taxing
body, State attorney general, or other
appropriate State official certifying that
the applicant organization has a nonprofit status and that none of the net
earning accrue to any private
shareholders or individuals.
• A certified copy of the
organization’s certificate of
1. Eligible Applicants
State governments
County governments
City or township governments
Special district governments
Independent school districts
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status
with the IRS, other than institutions
of higher education
Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3)
status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
State controlled institutions of higher
education
Private institutions of higher education
Additional Information on Eligibility
Faith-based and community
organizations that meet all other
eligibility requirements are eligible to
apply.
Institutions of higher education that
choose to apply must have an accredited
social work education program, or other
accredited bachelor or graduate level
programs leading to a degree relevant to
work in child welfare. Government
agencies must be child welfare agencies
to be eligible to apply.
Collaborative efforts are acceptable,
but applications should identify a
primary applicant responsible for
administering the grant.
2. Cost Sharing/Matching
Cost Sharing/Matching: Yes.
Matching/Cost-Sharing
Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the
project. The total approved cost of the
project is the sum of the ACF share and
the non-Federal share. The non-Federal
share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash
contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $250,000 in Federal funds
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Other Eligibility Information
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
35090
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
incorporation or similar document that
clearly establishes non-profit status.
• Any of the items in the
subparagraphs immediately above for a
State or national parent organization
and a statement signed by the parent
organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit
affiliate.
Disqualification Factors
Applications that exceed the ceiling
amount will be considered nonresponsive and will not be considered
for funding under this announcement.
Any application that fails to satisfy
the deadline requirements referenced in
Section IV.3 will be considered nonresponsive and will not be considered
for funding under this announcement.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package
ACYF Operations, The Dixon Group
ATTN: Children’s Bureau, 118 Q St.,
NE., Washington, DC 20002–2132,
Phone: 866–796–1591, URL: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/open/HHS2005-ACF-ACY-CA-0001.html.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Originals, Copies and Signatures
If submitting your application in
paper format, an original and two copies
of the complete application are
required. The original and each of the
two copies must include all required
forms, certifications, assurances, and
appendices, be signed by an authorized
representative, have original signatures,
and be submitted unbound.
Each application must contain the
following items in the order listed:
Application for Federal Assistance
(Standard Form 424). Follow the
instructions below and those that
accompany the form.
In Item 5 of Form 424, put DUNS
number in ‘‘Organizational DUNS:’’ box.
In Item 5 of Form 424, include name,
phone number, and, if available, email
and fax numbers of the contact person.
In Item 8 of Form 424, check ‘New.’
In Item 10 of Form 424, clearly
identify the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) program title and
number for the program for which funds
are being requested as stated in this
funding opportunity announcement.
In Item 11 of Form 424, identify the
single funding opportunity the
application addresses.
In Item 12 of Form 424, identify the
specific geographic area to be served.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
In Item 14 of Form 424, identify
Congressional districts of both the
applicant and project.
Budget Information Non-Construction
Programs (Form 424A) and Budget
Justification.
Follow the instructions provided here
and those in Section V. Application
Review Information.
Description—Please see Section V.1.
Criteria, for instructions on preparing
the project summary/abstract and the
full project description.
Proof of non-profit status (if
applicable). Please see Section III.3
Other Eligibility for ways to
demonstrate non-profit status.
Indirect cost rate agreement. If
claiming indirect costs, provide
documentation that applicant currently
has an indirect cost rate approved by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant
Federal agency.
Letters of agreement and memoranda
of understanding. If applicable, include
a letter of commitment or Memorandum
of Understanding from each partner
and/or sub-contractor describing their
role, detailing specific tasks to be
performed, and expressing commitment
to participate if the proposed project is
funded.
Match. Provide a letter of
commitment verifying the actual
amount of the non-Federal share of
project costs (see Section III.2).
General Content and Form
information: The application limit is 75
pages total including all forms and
attachments. Pages over this page limit
will be removed from the application
and will not be reviewed.
The application must be typed,
double spaced, printed on only one
side, with at least 1⁄2 inch margins on
each side and 1 inch at the top and
bottom, using standard 12 Point fonts
(such as Times New Roman or Courier).
Pages must be numbered.
All copies of an application must be
submitted in a single package, and a
separate package must be submitted for
each funding opportunity. The package
must be clearly labeled for the specific
funding opportunity it is addressing.
Because each application will be
duplicated, do not use or include
separate covers, binders, clips, tabs,
plastic inserts, maps, brochures, or any
other items that cannot be processed
easily on a photocopy machine with an
automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple,
or fasten in any way separate
subsections of the application,
including supporting documentation;
however, each complete copy must be
stapled securely in the upper left corner.
Applicants are advised that the copies
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the application submitted, not the
original, will be reproduced by the
Federal government for review.
Tips for Preparing a Competitive
Application. It is essential that
applicants read the entire
announcement package carefully before
preparing an application and include all
of the required application forms and
attachments. The application must
reflect a thorough understanding of the
purpose and objectives of the applicable
legislation. Reviewers expect applicants
to understand the goals of the legislation
and the Children’s Bureau’s interest in
each topic. A ‘‘responsive application’’
is one that addresses all of the
evaluation criteria in ways that
demonstrate this understanding.
Applications that are considered to be
‘‘unresponsive’’ generally receive very
low scores and are rarely funded.
The Children’s Bureau’s Web site
(https://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb)
provides a wide range of information
and links to other relevant Web sites.
Before you begin preparing an
application, we suggest that you learn
more about the mission and programs of
the Children’s Bureau by exploring the
Web site.
Organizing Your Application. The
specific evaluation criteria in Section V
of this funding announcement will be
used to review and evaluate each
application. The applicant should
address each of these specific evaluation
criteria in the project description.
Applicants should organize their project
description in this sequence: (1)
Objectives and Need for Assistance; (2)
Approach; (3) Organizational Profiles;
(4) Budget and Budget Justification; and
should use the same headings as these
criteria, so that reviewers can readily
find information that directly addresses
each of the specific review criteria.
Project Evaluation Plan. Project
evaluations are very important. If you
do not have the in-house capacity to
conduct an objective, comprehensive
evaluation of the project, then the
Children’s Bureau advises that you
propose contracting with a third-party
evaluator specializing in social science
or evaluation, or a university or college,
to conduct the evaluation. A skilled
evaluator can assist you in designing a
data collection strategy that is
appropriate for the evaluation of your
proposed project. Additional assistance
may be found in a document titled
‘‘Program Manager’s Guide to
Evaluation.’’ A copy of this document
can be accessed at https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/
other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/reports/
pmguide/pmguide_toc.html.
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
Logic Model. A logic model is a tool
that presents the conceptual framework
for a proposed project and explains the
linkages among program elements.
While there are many versions of the
logic model, they generally summarize
the logical connections among the needs
that are the focus of the project, project
goals and objectives, the target
population, project inputs (resources),
the proposed activities/processes/
outputs directed toward the target
population, the expected short- and
long-term outcomes the initiative is
designed to achieve, and the evaluation
plan for measuring the extent to which
proposed processes and outcomes
actually occur. Information on the
development of logic models is
available on the Internet at https://
www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/ or https://
www.extension.iastate.edu/cyfar/
capbuilding/outcome/
outcome_logicmdir.html.
Project Use of Human Subjects. If
your evaluation plan includes gathering
data from or about clients, there are
specific procedures which must be
followed in order to protect their
privacy and ensure the confidentiality
of the information about them.
Applicants planning to gather such data
are asked to describe their plans
regarding an Institutional Review Board
(IRB) review. If applicable, applicants
must include a completed Form 310,
Protection of Human Subjects. For more
information about use of human
subjects and IRB’s you can visit these
Web sites: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/
irb_chapter2.htm#d2 and https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/
guidance/ictips.htm.
You may submit your application to
us in either electronic or paper format.
To submit an application electronically,
please use the https://www.Grants.gov
apply site. If you use Grants.gov, you
will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit the
application via the Grants.gov site. You
may not e-mail an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
Please note the following if you plan
to submit your application
electronically via Grants.Gov
• Electronic submission is voluntary,
but strongly encouraged.
• When you enter the Grants.Gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation. We strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the application
process through Grants.Gov.
• To use Grants.gov, you, as the
applicant, must have a DUNS Number
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
and register in the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR). You should allow a
minimum of five days to complete the
CCR registration.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit a grant
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you submit an
application in paper format.
• You may submit all documents
electronically, including all information
typically included on the SF 424 and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
• Your application must comply with
any page limitation requirements
described in this program
announcement.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgement from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The Administration
for Children and Families will retrieve
your application from Grants.gov.
• We may request that you provide
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
• You may access the electronic
application for this program on
www.Grants.gov.
• You must search for the
downloadable application package by
the CFDA number.
Private, non-profit organizations are
encouraged to submit with their
applications the survey located under
‘‘Grant Related Documents and Forms,’’
‘‘Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Applicants,’’ titled, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants,’’ at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Standard Forms and Certifications
Applicants seeking financial
assistance under this announcement
must file the Standard Form (SF) 424,
Application for Federal Assistance; SF–
424A, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs; SF–424B,
Assurances—Non-Construction
Programs. The forms may be reproduced
for use in submitting applications.
Applicants must sign and return the
standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish prior to
award an executed copy of the Standard
Form LLL, Certification Regarding
Lobbying, when applying for an award
in excess of $100,000. Applicants who
have used non-Federal funds for
lobbying activities in connection with
receiving assistance under this
announcement shall complete a
disclosure form, if applicable, with their
applications (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 0348–0046). Applicants must
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35091
sign and return the certification with
their application.
Applicants must also understand they
will be held accountable for the
smoking prohibition included within
Pub. L. 103–227, Title XII
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also
known as the PRO–KIDS Act of 1994).
A copy of the Federal Register notice
which implements the smoking
prohibition is included with forms. By
signing and submitting the application,
applicants are providing the
certification and need not mail back the
certification with the application.
Applicants must make the appropriate
certification of their compliance with all
Federal statutes relating to
nondiscrimination. By signing and
submitting the applications, applicants
are providing the certification and need
not mail back the certification form.
Complete the standard forms and the
associated certifications and assurances
based on the instructions on the forms.
The forms and certifications may be
found at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Those organizations required to
provide proof of non-profit status,
please refer to Section III.3.
Please see Section V.1, for
instructions on preparing the full
project description.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Explanation of Due Dates: The closing
time and date for receipt of applications
is 4:30 p.m. (Eastern Time Zone) on the
date noted above. Mailed or hand
carried applications received after 4:30
p.m. on the closing date will be
classified as late.
Deadline: Mailed applications shall be
considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or
before the deadline time and date at the
ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon
Group, Inc., ATTN: Children’s Bureau,
118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC
20002–2132. Applicants are responsible
for mailing applications well in
advance, when using all mail services,
to ensure that the applications are
received on or before the deadline time
and date.
Applications hand carried by
applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by
overnight/express mail couriers shall be
considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or
before the deadline date, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., e.s.t., at the
ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon
Group, Inc., ATTN: Children’s Bureau,
118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC
20002–2132, between Monday and
Friday (excluding Federal holidays).
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
35092
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
This address must appear on the
envelope/package containing the
application with the note. Applicants
are cautioned that express/overnight
mail services do not always deliver as
agreed.
Late applications: Applications which
do not meet the criteria above are
considered late applications. ACF shall
notify each late applicant that its
application will not be considered in
the current competition. Any
application received after 4:30 p.m. on
the deadline date will not be considered
for competition. Applicants using
express/overnight mail services should
allow two working days prior to the
deadline date for receipt of applications.
(Applicants are cautioned that express/
overnight mail services do not always
deliver as agreed).
Extension of deadlines: ACF may
extend application deadlines when
circumstances such as acts of God
(floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur, or when
there are widespread disruptions of mail
service, or in other rare cases. A
determination to extend or waive
deadline requirements rests with the
Chief Grants Management Officer.
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
What to submit
Required content
Project Abstract .............................
See Section IV and V ...................
Project Narrative ............................
See Section IV and V ...................
SF424 ............................................
SF424A ..........................................
SF424B ..........................................
Assurances and Certifications .......
Proof of Non-profit status, if applicable.
Indirect Cost rate Agreement, if
applicable.
Letters of commitment from partner organizations, if applicable.
Non-Federal Commitment Letter ...
See
See
See
See
See
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
Format described in Section
and V.
Format described in Section
and V.
Format described in Section IV
Format described in Section IV
Format described in Section IV
Format described in Section IV
Format described in Section III
IV
By application due date.
IV
By application due date.
....
....
....
....
....
By
By
By
By
By
By Time of Award.
See Section IV ..............................
Format described in IV .................
By Time of Award.
See Section III.2 ...........................
See Section III.2 ...........................
By Time of Award.
located under ‘‘Grant Related
Documents and Forms’’ titled ‘‘Survey
for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Applicants’’ at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Required content
Non-Profit
Required form or format
Per required form .........................
May
be
found
on
https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
4. Intergovernmental Review
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ and 45 CFR Part 100,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of
Department of Health and Human
Services Programs and Activities.’’
Under the Order, States may design
their own processes for reviewing and
commenting on proposed Federal
assistance under covered programs.
As of October 1, 2004, the following
jurisdictions have elected to participate
in the Executive Order process:
Arkansas, California, Delaware, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri,
Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa,
Guam, North Mariana Islands, Puerto
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
application due date.
application due date.
application due date.
Time of Award.
Time of Award.
Format described in IV .................
What to submit
VerDate jul<14>2003
When to submit
See Section IV ..............................
Additional Forms: Private, nonprofit
organizations are encouraged to submit
with their applications the survey
Survey for Private,
Grant Applicants.
IV ..............................
IV ..............................
IV ..............................
IV ..............................
III and IV ..................
Required form or format
Jkt 205001
Rico, and Virgin Islands. As these
jurisdictions have elected to participate
in the Executive Order process, they
have established SPOCs. Applicants
from participating jurisdictions should
contact their SPOC, as soon as possible,
to alert them of prospective applications
and receive instructions. Applicants
must submit all required materials, if
any, to the SPOC and indicate the date
of this submittal (or the date of contact
if no submittal is required) on the
Standard Form 424, item 16a.
Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has
60 days from the application deadline to
comment on proposed new or
competing continuation awards. SPOCs
are encouraged to eliminate the
submission of routine endorsements as
official recommendations. Additionally,
SPOCs are requested to clearly
differentiate between mere advisory
comments and those official State
process recommendations which may
trigger the ‘‘accommodate or explain’’
rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
When to submit
With application.
When comments are submitted
directly to ACF, they should be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Grants Management,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., 4th floor,
Washington, DC 20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions
have chosen not to participate in the
process, entities that meet the eligibility
requirements of the program are still
eligible to apply for a grant even if a
State, Territory, Commonwealth, etc.
does not have a SPOC. Therefore,
applicants from these jurisdictions, or
for projects administered by federallyrecognized Indian Tribes, need take no
action in regard to E.O. 12372.
The official list, including addresses,
of the jurisdictions elected to participate
in E.O. 12372 can be found on the
following URL: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html.
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
5. Funding Restrictions
Grant awards will not allow
reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Construction is not an allowable
activity or expenditure under this
solicitation.
Applicants should note that grants to
be awarded under this program
announcement are subject to the
availability of funds. The size of the
actual awards will vary.
Because this is a training grant,
indirect costs used for these projects
shall not exceed 8 percent. Funds from
this grant cannot be used to match Title
IV–E training funds.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Submission by Mail: An Application
must provide an original application
with all attachments, signed by an
authorized representative and two
copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an
explanation of due dates. Applications
should be mailed to: ACYF Operations
Center, The Dixon Group, 118 Q St. NE.,
Washington, DC 20002–2132, Attention:
Children’s Bureau.
Hand Delivery: An Applicant must
provide an original application with all
attachments signed by an authorized
representative and two copies. Please
see Section IV.3 for an explanation of
due dates. Applications should be
delivered to: ACYF Operations Center,
The Dixon Group, 118 Q St. NE,
Washington, DC 20002–2132, Attention:
Children’s Bureau.
Electronic Submission: https://
www.grants.gov Please see section IV.2
Content and Form of Application
Submission, for guidelines and
requirements when submitting
applications electronically.
V. Application Review Information
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13)
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 40 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining
the data needed and reviewing the
collection information.
The project description is approved
under OMB control number 0970–0139
which expires 4/30/2007.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The following are instructions and
guidelines on how to prepare the
‘‘Project Summary/Abstract’’ and ‘‘Full
Project Description’’ sections of the
application. Under the evaluation
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
criteria section, note that each criterion
is preceded by the generic evaluation
requirement under the ACF Uniform
Project Description (UPD).
35093
Approach
Applicants required to submit a full
project description shall prepare the
project description statement in
accordance with the following
instructions while being aware of the
specified evaluation criteria. The text
options give a broad overview of what
your project description should include
while the evaluation criteria identifies
the measures that will be used to
evaluate applications.
Outline a plan of action that describes
the scope and detail of how the
proposed work will be accomplished.
Account for all functions or activities
identified in the application. Cite factors
that might accelerate or decelerate the
work and state your reason for taking
the proposed approach rather than
others. Describe any unusual features of
the project such as design or
technological innovations, reductions in
cost or time, or extraordinary social and
community involvement. Provide
quantitative monthly or quarterly
projections of the accomplishments to
be achieved for each function or activity
in such terms as the number of people
to be served and the number of activities
accomplished.
When accomplishments cannot be
quantified by activity or function, list
them in chronological order to show the
schedule of accomplishments and their
target dates. If any data is to be
collected, maintained, and/or
disseminated, clearance may be
required from the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). This
clearance pertains to any ‘‘collection of
information that is conducted or
sponsored by ACF.’’ List organizations,
cooperating entities, consultants, or
other key individuals who will work on
the project along with a short
description of the nature of their effort
or contribution.
Project/Summary Abstract
Organizational Profiles
Provide a summary of the project
description (a page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
Provide information on the applicant
organization(s) and cooperating
partners, such as organizational charts,
financial statements, audit reports or
statements from CPAs/Licensed Public
Accountants, Employer Identification
Numbers, names of bond carriers,
contact persons and telephone numbers,
child care licenses and other
documentation of professional
accreditation, information on
compliance with Federal/State/local
government standards, documentation
of experience in the program area, and
other pertinent information. If the
applicant is a non-profit organization,
submit proof of non-profit status in its
application. The non-profit agency can
accomplish this by providing: (a) A
reference to the applicant organization’s
listing in the Internal Revenue Service’s
(IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt
organizations described in the IRS Code;
(b) a copy of a currently valid IRS tax
exemption certificate, (c) a statement
from a State taxing body, State attorney
general, or other appropriate State
official certifying that the applicant
organization has a non-profit status and
1. Criteria
General Instructions
ACF is particularly interested in
specific project descriptions that focus
on outcomes and convey strategies for
achieving intended performance. Project
descriptions are evaluated on the basis
of substance and measurable outcomes,
not length. Extensive exhibits are not
required. Cross-referencing should be
used rather than repetition. Supporting
information concerning activities that
will not be directly funded by the grant
or information that does not directly
pertain to an integral part of the grant
funded activity should be placed in an
appendix. Pages should be numbered
and a table of contents should be
included for easy reference.
Introduction
Objectives and Need for Assistance
Clearly identify the physical,
economic, social, financial,
institutional, and/or other problem(s)
requiring a solution. The need for
assistance must be demonstrated and
the principal and subordinate objectives
of the project must be clearly stated;
supporting documentation, such as
letters of support and testimonials from
concerned interests other than the
applicant, may be included. Any
relevant data based on planning studies
should be included or referred to in the
endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate
demographic data and participant/
beneficiary information, as needed. In
developing the project description, the
applicant may volunteer or be requested
to provide information on the total
range of projects currently being
conducted and supported (or to be
initiated), some of which may be
outside the scope of the program
announcement.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
35094
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
that none of the net earnings accrue to
any private shareholders or individuals;
(d) a certified copy of the organization’s
certificate of incorporation or similar
document that clearly establishes nonprofit status, (e) any of the items
immediately above for a State or
national parent organization and a
statement signed by the parent
organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit
affiliate.
Budget and Budget Justification
Provide a budget with line item detail
and detailed calculations for each
budget object class identified on the
Budget Information form. Detailed
calculations must include estimation
methods, quantities, unit costs, and
other similar quantitative detail
sufficient for the calculation to be
duplicated. Also include a breakout by
the funding sources identified in Block
15 of the SF–424. Provide a narrative
budget justification that describes how
the categorical costs are derived.
Discuss the necessity, reasonableness,
and allocability of the proposed costs.
General
Use the following guidelines for
preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and nonFederal resources shall be detailed and
justified in the budget and narrative
justification. ‘‘Federal resources’’ refers
only to the ACF grant for which you are
applying. ‘‘Non Federal resources’’ are
all other Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget
amounts and computations be presented
in a columnar format: first column,
object class categories; second column,
Federal budget; next column(s), nonFederal budget(s), and last column, total
budget. The budget justification should
be a narrative.
Personnel
Description: Costs of employee
salaries and wages. Justification:
Identify the project director or principal
investigator, if known. For each staff
person, provide the title, time
commitment to the project (in months),
time commitment to the project (as a
percentage or full-time equivalent),
annual salary, grant salary, wage rates,
etc. Do not include the costs of
consultants or personnel costs of
delegate agencies or of specific
project(s) or businesses to be financed
by the applicant.
Fringe Benefits
Description: Costs of employee fringe
benefits unless treated as part of an
approved indirect cost rate.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
Justification: Provide a breakdown of
the amounts and percentages that
comprise fringe benefit costs such as
health insurance, FICA, retirement
insurance, taxes, etc.
Travel
Description: Costs of project-related
travel by employees of the applicant
organization (does not include costs of
consultant travel). Justification: For each
trip, show the total number of
traveler(s), travel destination, duration
of trip, per diem, mileage allowances, if
privately owned vehicles will be used,
and other transportation costs and
subsistence allowances. Travel costs for
key staff to attend ACF-sponsored
workshops should be detailed in the
budget.
Equipment
Description: ‘‘Equipment’’ means an
article of nonexpendable, tangible
personal property having a useful life of
more than one year and an acquisition
cost which equals or exceeds the lesser
of (a) the capitalization level established
by the organization for the financial
statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note:
Acquisition cost means the net invoice
unit price of an item of equipment,
including the cost of any modifications,
attachments, accessories, or auxiliary
apparatus necessary to make it usable
for the purpose for which it is acquired.
Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty,
protective in-transit insurance, freight,
and installation shall be included in or
excluded from acquisition cost in
accordance with the organization’s
regular written accounting practices.)
Justification: For each type of
equipment requested, provide a
description of the equipment, the cost
per unit, the number of units, the total
cost, and a plan for use on the project,
as well as use or disposal of the
equipment after the project ends. An
applicant organization that uses its own
definition for equipment should provide
a copy of its policy or section of its
policy which includes the equipment
definition.
Supplies
Description: Costs of all tangible
personal property other than that
included under the Equipment category.
Justification: Specify general categories
of supplies and their costs. Show
computations and provide other
information which supports the amount
requested.
Contractual
Description: Costs of all contracts for
services and goods except for those that
belong under other categories such as
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
equipment, supplies, construction, etc.
Include third party evaluation contracts
(if applicable) and contracts with
secondary recipient organizations,
including delegate agencies and specific
project(s) or businesses to be financed
by the applicant. Justification:
Demonstrate that all procurement
transactions will be conducted in a
manner to provide, to the maximum
extent practical, open and free
competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are
required to use Part 92 procedures, must
justify any anticipated procurement
action that is expected to be awarded
without competition and exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold fixed at
41 U.S.C. 403(11) (currently set at
$100,000).
Recipients might be required to make
available to ACF pre-award review and
procurement documents, such as
request for proposals or invitations for
bids, independent cost estimates, etc.
Note: Whenever the applicant intends to
delegate part of the project to another
agency, the applicant must provide a
detailed budget and budget narrative for
each delegate agency, by agency title,
along with the required supporting
information referred to in these
instructions.
Other
Enter the total of all other costs. Such
costs, where applicable and appropriate,
may include but are not limited to
insurance, food, medical and dental
costs (noncontractual), professional
services costs, space and equipment
rentals, printing and publication,
computer use, training costs, such as
tuition and stipends, staff development
costs, and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a
narrative description and a justification
for each cost under this category.
Indirect Charges
Description: Total amount of indirect
costs. This category should be used only
when the applicant currently has an
indirect cost rate approved by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant
Federal agency. Justification: An
applicant that will charge indirect costs
to the grant must enclose a copy of the
current rate agreement. If the applicant
organization is in the process of initially
developing or renegotiating a rate, upon
notification that an award will be made,
it should immediately develop a
tentative indirect cost rate proposal
based on its most recently completed
fiscal year, in accordance with the
cognizant agency’s guidelines for
establishing indirect cost rates, and
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
submit it to the cognizant agency.
Applicants awaiting approval of their
indirect cost proposals may also request
indirect costs. When an indirect cost
rate is requested, those costs included in
the indirect cost pool should not also be
charged as direct costs to the grant.
Also, if the applicant is requesting a rate
which is less than what is allowed
under the program, the authorized
representative of the applicant
organization must submit a signed
acknowledgement that the applicant is
accepting a lower rate than allowed.
Evaluation Criteria
The following evaluation criteria
appear in weighted descending order.
The corresponding score values indicate
the relative importance that ACF places
on each evaluation criterion; however,
applicants need not develop their
applications precisely according to the
order presented. Application
components may be organized such that
a reviewer will be able to follow a
seamless and logical flow of information
(e.g. from a broad overview of the
project to more detailed information
about how it will be conducted).
In considering how applicants will
carry out the responsibilities addressed
under this announcement, competing
applications for financial assistance will
be reviewed and evaluated against the
following criteria:
Approach 50 Points
In reviewing the approach, the
following factors will be considered: (50
Points)
(1) The extent to which there is a
reasonable timeline for effectively
implementing the proposed project,
including major milestones and target
dates. The extent to which the project
will complete the development, field
testing and revisions of the training
program in a timely manner and
conduct a thorough evaluation of its
effectiveness within the 3-year project
time frame.
(2) The extent to which the
application proposes development of
appropriate materials and provides for
effective training under the proposed
project.
(3) The extent to which the
application demonstrates a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the
issues related to interventions with
older youth and differences and
similarities between youth-centered and
family-centered practice. The extent to
which the application demonstrates a
thorough understanding of these issues
in terms of the Adoption and Safe
Families Act goals of safety,
permanency and well-being of older
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
youth and the results of the Child and
Family Service Reviews.
(4) The extent to which the
application evidences a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the
challenges of providing and improving
training for supervisors within a public
child welfare agency. The extent to
which the proposed project would
successfully overcome these challenges.
(5) The extent to which past and/or
current collaboration between the
applicant and the public (State/local
and Tribal) agencies in training of child
welfare staff would strengthen this
project. The extent to which this project
will be strengthened by building on
existing partnerships with such
agencies. The extent to which the
applicant includes interagency
agreements and commitments from the
participating entities. The extent to
which there are strong links between the
proposed project, and the State’s Child
and Family Service Review Program
Improvement Plan.
(6) The extent to which the proposed
approach to developing a curriculum is
soundly based on an appropriate
conceptual framework, research and
practice experience. The extent to
which this curriculum would build on,
expand and strengthen the existing
curriculum approaches/models that
emphasize youth-focused services.
(7) The extent to which the
application evidences a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the
four core principles (youth
development, cultural competence,
collaboration, and permanent
connections) and the challenges
attendant to incorporating these
principles within child welfare
practices.
(8) The extent to which the
curriculum development and training of
supervisors will be culturally
responsive to the diverse child welfare
population.
(9) The extent to which appropriate
criteria would be utilized for selection
and recruitment of trainees. The extent
to which there are specific, sound,
strategies for recruiting minority and
Tribal agency trainees.
(10) The extent to which there is a
sound plan for evaluating the training
curriculum. The extent to which there is
a sound plan for field-testing the
effectiveness of the competency-based
curriculum and modifying the
curriculum, if necessary. The extent to
which the applicant clearly identifies
and justifies the location of the project
and the State/local child welfare
agencies where the proposed
curriculum will be field-tested. The
extent to which the evaluation will
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35095
examine outcomes identified in this
announcement.
(11) The extent to which there is a
sound plan for dissemination of the
curriculum and project evaluation
findings. The extent to which the
applicant’s dissemination plan will
contribute to the purposes described in
this announcement. The extent to which
the dissemination plan clearly describes
what will be disseminated, to whom,
how extensive these efforts will be, and
includes plans for evaluating
dissemination efforts.
(12) The extent to which there is a
sound plan for continuing this project
beyond the period of Federal funding.
Organizational Profiles 20 Points
In reviewing the organizational
profiles, the following factors will be
considered: (20 Points)
(1) The extent to which the
application evidences sufficient
experience and expertise in developing
training curricula and providing
training to child welfare agency staff in
the area of youth-focused services; in
collaboration with child welfare
agencies and other appropriate entities;
and in administration, development,
implementation, management, and
evaluation of similar projects. The
extent to which each participating
organization (including partners and/or
subcontractors) possesses the
organizational capability to fulfill their
assigned roles and functions effectively
(if the application involves partnering
and/or subcontracting with other
agencies/organizations).
(2) The extent to which the proposed
project director and key project staff
possess sufficient relevant knowledge,
experience and capabilities to
implement and manage a project of this
size, scope and complexity effectively
(e.g., resume). The extent to which the
role, responsibilities and time
commitments of each proposed project
staff position, including consultants,
subcontractors and/or partners, are
clearly defined and appropriate to the
successful implementation of the
proposed project.
(3) The extent to which there is a
sound management plan for achieving
the objectives of the proposed project on
time and within budget, including
clearly defined responsibilities,
timelines and milestones for
accomplishing project tasks and
ensuring quality. The extent to which
the plan clearly defines the role and
responsibilities of the lead agency. The
extent to which the plan clearly
describes the effective management and
coordination of activities carried out by
any partners, subcontractors and
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
35096
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
consultants (if applicable). The extent to
which there would be a mutually
beneficial relationship between the
proposed project and other work
planned, anticipated or underway with
Federal assistance by the applicant.
Objectives and Need for Assistance 20
Points
In reviewing the objectives and need
for assistance, the following factors will
be considered: (20 Points)
(1) The extent to which the
application demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the need for a specific
curriculum and training to strengthen
child welfare supervisors’ capacity to
prepare and guide staff in their work
with older youth involved in the child
welfare system.
(2) The extent to which the
application demonstrates a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the
issues faced by older youth involved in
the child welfare system and
appropriate intervention approaches for
working with these youth.
(3) The extent to which the proposed
project’s goals (end products of an
effective project) and objectives
(measurable steps for reaching these
goals) clearly and appropriately relate to
the training needs of public child
welfare agency frontline workers and
supervisory staff.
(4) The extent to which the proposed
project would produce significant
results and benefits by developing, field
testing, delivering, evaluating and
disseminating a youth-focused training
curriculum for supervisors.
(5) The extent to which an
appropriate group of trainees and a
reasonable number of trainees will be
trained over the life of the project.
(6) The extent to which the lessons
learned from the project will clearly and
significantly benefit policy, practice and
theory development in addressing older
youth’s transition needs, issues and
crises.
Budget and Budget Justification 10
Points
In reviewing the budget and budget
justification, the following factors will
be considered: (10 Points)
(1) The extent to which the costs of
the proposed project are clearly
identified, justified and reasonable, in
view of the activities to be conducted
and expected results and benefits.
(2) The extent to which the
applicant’s fiscal controls and
accounting procedures would ensure
prudent use, proper and timely
disbursement and accurate accounting
of funds received under this program
announcement.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
2. Review and Selection Process
Approved but Unfunded Applications
Since ACF will be using non-Federal
reviewers in the review process,
applicants have the option of omitting
from the application copies (not the
original) of specific salary rates or
amounts for individuals specified in the
application budget.
No grant award will be made under
this announcement on the basis of an
incomplete application.
A panel of at least three reviewers
(primarily experts from outside the
Federal government) will use the
evaluation criteria described in this
announcement to evaluate each
application. The reviewers will
determine the strengths and weaknesses
of each application, provide comments
about the strengths and weaknesses and
give each application a numerical score.
The results of the competitive review
are a primary factor in making funding
decisions. In addition, Federal staff
conducts administrative reviews of the
applications and, in light of the results
of the competitive review, will
recommend applications for funding to
the ACYF Commissioner. ACYF
reserves the option of discussing
applications with other funding sources
when this is in the best interest of the
Federal government. ACYF may also
solicit and consider comments from
ACF Regional Office staff in making
funding decisions. ACYF may take into
consideration the involvement
(financial and/or programmatic) of the
private sector, national, or State or
community foundations; a favorable
balance between Federal and nonFederal funds for the proposed project;
or the potential for high benefit from
low Federal investment. ACYF may
elect not to fund any applicants having
known management, fiscal, reporting,
programmatic, or other problems which
make it unlikely that they would be able
to provide effective services or
effectively complete the proposed
activity.
With the results of the peer review
and the information from Federal staff,
the Commissioner of ACYF makes the
final funding decisions. The
Commissioner may give special
consideration to applications proposing
services of special interest to the
Government and to achieve geographic
distributions of grant awards.
Applications of special interest may
include, but are not limited to,
applications focusing on un-served or
inadequately served clients or service
areas and programs addressing diverse
ethnic populations.
Applications that are approved but
unfunded may be held over for funding
in the next funding cycle, pending the
availability of funds, for a period not to
exceed one year.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Applications will be reviewed in the
summer of 2005. Grant awards will have
a start date no later than September 30,
2005.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The successful applicants will be
notified through the issuance of a
Financial Assistance Award document
which sets forth the amount of funds
granted, the terms and conditions of the
grant, the effective date of the grant, the
budget period for which initial support
will be given, the non-Federal share to
be provided, and the total project period
for which support is contemplated. The
Financial Assistance Award will be
signed by the Grants Officer and
transmitted via postal mail.
Organizations whose applications will
not be funded will be notified in
writing.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Direct Federal grants, sub-award
funds, or contracts under this program
shall not be used to support inherently
religious activities such as religious
instruction, worship, or proselytization.
Therefore, organizations must take steps
to separate, in time or location, their
inherently religious activities from the
services funded under this Program.
Regulations pertaining to the Equal
Treatment for Faith-based
Organizations, which includes the
prohibition against Federal funding of
inherently religious activities, can be
found at either 45 CFR 87.1 or the HHS
Web site at https://www.os.dhhs.gov/
fbci/waisgate21.pdf.
Grantees are subject to the
requirements in 45 CFR Part 74 (nongovernmental) or 45 CFR Part 92
(governmental) organizations.
3. Reporting Requirements
Program Progress Reports: SemiAnnually.
Financial Reports: Semi-Annually.
Grantees will be required to submit
program progress reports and financial
reports (SF269) throughout the project
period. Program progress and financial
reports are due 30 days after the
reporting period. In addition, final
programmatic and financial reports are
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
35097
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices
due 90 days after the close of the project
period.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
VII. Agency Contacts
Food and Drug Administration
Program Office Contact: Pam Johnson,
330 C St., SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Phone: 202–205–8086, E-mail:
pjohnson@acf.hhs.gov.
Grants Management Office Contact:
Peter Thompson, Grants Officer,
Administration for Children and
Families, Children’s Bureau, 330 C
Street, SW., Room 2070, Washington,
DC 20447, Phone: 202–401–4608, Email: pathompson@acf.hhs.gov.
[Docket No. 2005N–0124]
VIII. Other Information
ACTION:
Notice: Beginning with FY 2006, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) will no longer publish
grant announcements in the Federal
Register. Beginning October 1, 2005
applicants will be able to find a
synopsis of all ACF grant opportunities
and apply electronically for
opportunities via: www.Grants.gov.
Applicants will also be able to find the
complete text of all ACF grant
announcements on the ACF Web site
located at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
grants/.
Additional information about this
program and its purpose can be located
on the following Web sites: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/.
For general questions regarding this
announcement please contact: ACYF
Operations Center, The Dixon Group
ATTN: Children’s Bureau, 118 Q Street,
NE., Washington DC 20002–2132,
Telephone: 866–796–1591.
Applicants will not be sent
acknowledgements of received
applications.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by July 18,
2005.
ADDRESSES: OMB is still experiencing
significant delays in the regular mail,
including first class and express mail,
and messenger deliveries are not being
accepted. To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: Fumie Yokota, Desk Officer
for FDA, FAX: 202–395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Robbins, Office of Management
Programs (HFA–250), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–1223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Dated: June 8, 2005.
Susan Orr,
Acting Commissioner, Administration on
Children, Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. 05–11920 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Guidance for
Industry: Notification of a Health Claim
or Nutrient Content Claim Based on an
Authoritative Statement of a Scientific
Body
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice.
Guidance for Industry: Notification of a
Health Claim or Nutrient Content Claim
Based on an Authoritative Statement of
a Scientific Body—(OMB Control
Number 0910–0374)—Extension
Section 403(r)(2)(G) and (r)(3)(C) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(2)(G) and
(r)(3)(C)), as amended by the FDA
Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA),
provides that a food producer may
market a food product whose label bears
a nutrient content claim or a health
claim that is based on an authoritative
statement of a scientific body of the U.S.
Government or the National Academy of
Sciences. Under this section of the act,
a food producer that intends to use such
a claim must submit a notification of its
intention to use the claim 120 days
before it begins marketing the product
bearing the claim. In the Federal
Register of June 11, 1998 (63 FR 32102),
FDA announced the availability of a
guidance entitled ‘‘Guidance for
Industry: Notification of a Health Claim
or Nutrient Content Claim Based on an
Authoritative Statement of a Scientific
Body.’’ The guidance provides the
agency’s interpretation of terms central
to the submission of a notification and
the agency’s views on the information
that should be included in the
notification. The agency believes that
the guidance will enable food producers
to meet the criteria for notifications that
are established in section 403(r)(2)(G)
and (r)(3)(C) of the act. In addition to the
information specifically required by the
act to be in such notifications, the
guidance states that the notifications
should also contain information on
analytical methodology for the nutrient
that is the subject of a claim based on
an authoritative statement. FDA intends
to review the notifications the agency
receives to ensure that they comply with
the criteria established by the act.
In the Federal Register of April 8,
2005 (70 FR 18031), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the information collection
provisions. One comment was received
that was not relevant to the information
collection.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Section of the act/basis of burden
No. of
respondents
No. of responses
per respondent
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
403(r)(2)(G) (nutrient content claims)
1
1
1
250
250
403(r)(3)(C) (health claims)
2
1
2
450
900
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Jun 15, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 115 (Thursday, June 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35087-35097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11920]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children's Bureau
Funding Opportunity Title: Training of Child Welfare Agency
Supervisors in the Effective Delivery and Management of Federal
Independent Living Service for Youth in Foster Care
Announcement Type: Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS-2005-ACF-ACYF-CW-0009.
CFDA Number: 93.556.
Due Date for Applications: August 5, 2005.
Category of Funding Activity: Social Services and Income Security.
Executive Summary: The Children's Bureau announces the availability
of funds and requests applications to develop, implement, evaluate and
disseminate a training curriculum for public child welfare agency
supervisors. This curriculum will strengthen supervision of staff
interventions with older youth who are in foster care and/or in
independent living programs. These youth, mostly ages 16 to 21, need
assistance in making a successful transition to adulthood, as well as
achieving self-sufficiency to avoid long-term dependency on the social
welfare system.
These youth often face decisions with regard to personal housing,
transportation, employment and education. They need workers who can
guide them and who understand these challenges. The target youth also
need workers who have a working knowledge of adolescent transition
programs. ``In the continuing work of the Muskie School of Public
Service, University of Southern Maine and National Resource Center for
Youth Services, College of Continuing Education University of Oklahoma,
four core principles have emerged as essential in order for adolescent
transitional living programs to be successful.'' It is the thinking of
current experts in the field that programs for youth are more likely to
be successful when these four principles are incorporated into the
program design regardless of the type of services provided. The
principles are:
(1) Positive youth development;
(2) Collaboration;
(3) Cultural competence; and
(4) Permanent connections.
Priority Area 1
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Children's Bureau announces the availability of funds and
requests applications to develop, implement, evaluate and disseminate a
training curriculum for public child welfare agency supervisors. This
curriculum will strengthen supervision of staffs' interventions with
older youth who are in foster care and/or in independent living
programs. These youth, mostly age 16 to 21, need assistance in making a
successful transition to adulthood, as well as help in avoiding long-
term dependency on the social welfare system.
These youth often face decisions with regard to personal housing,
transportation, employment and education. They need workers who can
guide them and who understand these challenges. The target youth also
need workers who have a working knowledge of adolescent transition
programs. ``In the continuing work of the Muskie School of Public
Service, University of Southern Maine and National Resource Center for
Youth Services, College of Continuing Education University of
[[Page 35088]]
Oklahoma, four core principles have emerged as essential in order for
adolescent transitional living programs to be successful.'' It is the
thinking of current experts in the field that programs for youth are
more likely to be successful when these four principles are
incorporated into the program design regardless of the type of services
provided. The principles are:
(1) Positive youth development;
(2) Collaboration;
(3) Cultural competence; and
(4) Permanent connections.
For more information on these principles contact the University of
Oklahoma, National Resource Center for Youth Services at https://
www.nrcys.ou.edu.
Child welfare supervisors must ensure that child welfare workers
understand and utilize:
(1) Positive youth development philosophy;
(2) Client assessment;
(3) Age-appropriate intervention planning; and
(4) Implementation and evaluation of individualized Independent
Living Program (ILP) training and program activities.
Training based on the curriculum should increase child welfare
supervisor's ability to supervise a worker in:
(1) Assessing a youth's readiness for ILP services, support and
training;
(2) Identifying culturally competent ILP program services and
activities;
(3) Utilizing positive youth development principles for involving
youth in decisionmaking, implementation and evaluation of training and
program activities;
(4) Identifying areas of stress and its impact on youth in foster
care;
(5) Working with youth to help them deal with crisis situations and
to assess the results of the intervention;
(6) Working with youth to develop and maintain permanent
connections; and
(7) Collaborating with both inter- and intra-agency resource people
to achieve positive outcomes for youth transitioning to adulthood.
Background
In December 1999, Congress passed new independent living
legislation, the John H. Chaffee Foster Care Independence Program which
amended the original Federal Independent Living Program (section 477 of
the Social Security Act). The new program provides States with
increased funding and flexibility to help youth make the transition
from foster care to self-sufficiency. Currently all 50 States, Puerto
Rico and the District of Columbia have an ILP. Services and activities
include educational and employment assistance, training in basic living
skills (budgeting, housekeeping, food shopping, building and
maintaining positive social relationships), counseling, housing, case
management and outreach services. The new legislation allows the use of
these funds for additional activities including room and board, age-
appropriate services to youth younger than 16, post-secondary
educational assistance and preventive health activities.
In addition, the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) has
had considerable impact on child welfare practice and how the goals of
safety, permanency and well-being of youth must be accomplished. Thus,
there is a need to refocus attention on practice approaches that give
attention, as appropriate, to reunification with the biological
parents, adoption, placement, or other alternative approaches to
permanency for youth of all ages. For many older foster care youth,
even if they can spend time with family members, their chances for a
successful transition to adulthood are greatly improved if they learn
to count on themselves to address their daily challenges, and if they
have the knowledge, skills and experience to do so.
Older youth in foster care need special help and support. As of
September 30, 2002 there were an estimated 533,897 children in
substitute/foster care. Of these children an estimated 39 percent were
identified as being 13 years of age or older (AFCARS--Adoption and
Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System--data as of October 2003).
Approximately 20,000 youth age out of the system every year. These
young people often have histories of significant abuse, neglect and
multiple foster care placements. They often find themselves completely
on their own after discharge, with few, if any, financial resources;
limited education, training and employment options; no safe place to
live; and little or no support from family, friends and community. A
focus on the four core principles for these youth is crucial. The
permanent connections work to help ground the youth in the community
and provide a support system that these traumatized youth often lack.
Collaborations help to ensure that a full array of services is
available to the youth during and after their transition from care. A
focus on positive youth development allows the youth to have the daily
living skills needed to function on their own along with the knowledge
to maintain their emotional health. Through the provision of culturally
competent services, the agencies ensure that youth feel protected and
connected in their environment.
Training of child welfare supervisors has predominantly focused on
supervising staff to meet generalized permanency needs while focusing
on the family as a whole. Most of this work is still done in the
context of family-centered services that build on family strengths and
meet family needs. There is limited attention given to assessing
problem situations from the youth's perspective and preparing a youth
for independence and/or transitioning out of foster care. This training
would focus on strategies for supervising the child welfare worker in
how to identify the specific needs of these youth and develop a plan
for achieving goals to meet those needs regardless of other permanency
work being done in the family unit.
Specialized skills are essential to work effectively with older
youth. Child welfare supervisors need training to understand youth
development principles and strategies, to focus on giving young people
age-appropriate opportunities to exercise leadership, build skills, and
become involved in the decision-making about their future.
In January 2000, DHHS established the Child and Family Service
Reviews (CFSR) that have enhanced monitoring of State child welfare
programs. Previous approaches had not allowed for states to learn from
their mistakes and make improvements accordingly. Meetings with
stakeholders during CFSR indicate that foster parents, guardians and
other primary care providers need youth development training. In
addition, state agency staff need training and technical assistance in
assisting youth in developing their case plan, and developing life-long
connections that will assist them with permanency. Results of the 2002
reviews indicate that all of the states were found to need improvement
in involving the family in case planning, assessing needs and providing
services.
In the fall of 2000, the Children's Bureau awarded twelve grants
for Independent Living Training for Child Welfare practitioners. One
finding of these recently completed projects is that Child Welfare
supervisors needed training on youth development to understand the
unique developmental and service needs of youth in care in order to
support caseworker efforts.
The Children's Bureau recognizes the need to involve young people
in decision-making and planning for a life of independence. To
accomplish this,
[[Page 35089]]
service providers must offer specialized, age-appropriate support for
these youth as they transition to adulthood. Training implemented under
this program will provide child welfare supervisors with the training
and tools needed to assist child welfare workers to help move their
older youth through a successful transition to independence and
achieving self-sufficiency.
Projects funded under this announcement will be expected to:
1. Have the project fully functioning within 90 days following the
notification of the grant award.
2. Participate if the Children's Bureau chooses to do a national
evaluation or a technical assistance contract that relates to this
funding announcement.
3. Submit all performance indicator data, program and financial
reports in a timely manner, in recommended format (to be provided), and
submit the final report on disk or electronically using a standard
word-processing program.
4. Submit a copy of the final report, the evaluation report, and
any program products to the National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and
Neglect Information, 330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20447, within 90
days of project end date. This is in addition to the standard
requirement that the final program and evaluation report must also be
submitted to the Grants Management Specialist and the Federal Project
Officer.
5. Allocate sufficient funds in the budget to:
(a) Provide for the project director, the evaluator and a child
welfare representative to attend an annual 3-day grantees' meeting in
Washington, DC.
(b) Provide for the project director, the evaluator and a child
walfare representative to attend an early kickoff meeting for grantees
funded under this priority area to be held within the first three
months of the project (first year only) in Washington, DC; and
(c) Provide for 10-15 percent of the proposed budget to project
evaluaton.
Legislative Authority
The Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program (Section 430, Title
IV-B, subpart 2, of the Social Security Act) (42 U.S.C. 629a)
II. Award Information
Funding Instrument Type: Grant.
Anticipated total priority area funding: $1,000,000.
Anticipated number of awards: 0 to 4.
Average Projected Award Amount: $250,000.
Length of Project Periods: 36 month project with three 12 month
budget periods.
Other:
Explanation of other: The grant amount will not exceed $250,000 in
the first budget period. The projects will be awarded for a project
period of 36 months. The initial grant award will be for a 12-month
budget period. The award of continuation funding beyond each 12-month
budget period will be subject to the availability of funds,
satisfactory progress on the part of the grantee, and a determination
that continued funding would be in the best interest of the Government.
Ceiling of Individual Awards per budget period: $250,000.
Floor on amount of individual awards None.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
State governments
County governments
City or township governments
Special district governments
Independent school districts
Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
State controlled institutions of higher education
Private institutions of higher education
Additional Information on Eligibility
Faith-based and community organizations that meet all other
eligibility requirements are eligible to apply.
Institutions of higher education that choose to apply must have an
accredited social work education program, or other accredited bachelor
or graduate level programs leading to a degree relevant to work in
child welfare. Government agencies must be child welfare agencies to be
eligible to apply.
Collaborative efforts are acceptable, but applications should
identify a primary applicant responsible for administering the grant.
2. Cost Sharing/Matching
Cost Sharing/Matching: Yes.
Matching/Cost-Sharing
Grantees must provide at least 25 percent of the total approved
cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum
of the ACF share and the non-Federal share. The non-Federal share may
be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions.
Therefore, a project requesting $250,000 in Federal funds (based on an
award of $250,000 per budget period) must provide a match of at least
$83,333 (25 percent of the total approved project costs). Grantees will
be held accountable for commitments of non-Federal resources even if
over the amount of the required match. Failure to provide the amount
will result in disallowance of Federal funds. Lack of supporting
documentation at the time of application will not impact the
responsiveness of the application for competitive review.
Cost-sharing will not be used as a preference and/or evaluation
criterion in the review of applications.
3. Other Eligibility Information
All applicants must have a Dun & Bradstreet number. On June 27,
2003 the Office of Management and Budget published in the Federal
Register a new Federal policy applicable to all Federal grant
applicants. The policy requires all Federal grant applicants to provide
a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number when
applying for Federal grants or cooperative agreements on or after
October 1, 2003. The DUNS number will be required whether an applicant
is submitting a paper application or using the government-wide
electronic portal (www.Grants.gov). A DUNS number will be required for
every application for a new award or renewal/continuation of an award,
including applications or plans under formula, entitlement and block
grant programs, submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization has a DUNS number. You may
acquire a DUNS number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free
DUNS number request line on 1-866-705-5711 or you may request a number
on-line at https://www.dnb.com.
Non-profit organizations applying for funding are required to
submit proof of their non-profit status.
Proof of non-profit status is any one of the following:
A reference to the applicant organization's listing in the
Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt
organizations described in the IRS Code.
A copy of a currently valid IRS tax exemption certificate.
A statement from a State taxing body, State attorney
general, or other appropriate State official certifying that the
applicant organization has a non-profit status and that none of the net
earning accrue to any private shareholders or individuals.
A certified copy of the organization's certificate of
[[Page 35090]]
incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes non-profit
status.
Any of the items in the subparagraphs immediately above
for a State or national parent organization and a statement signed by
the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local non-
profit affiliate.
Disqualification Factors
Applications that exceed the ceiling amount will be considered non-
responsive and will not be considered for funding under this
announcement.
Any application that fails to satisfy the deadline requirements
referenced in Section IV.3 will be considered non-responsive and will
not be considered for funding under this announcement.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package
ACYF Operations, The Dixon Group ATTN: Children's Bureau, 118 Q
St., NE., Washington, DC 20002-2132, Phone: 866-796-1591, URL: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/grants/open/HHS-2005-ACF-ACY-CA-0001.html.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Originals, Copies and Signatures
If submitting your application in paper format, an original and two
copies of the complete application are required. The original and each
of the two copies must include all required forms, certifications,
assurances, and appendices, be signed by an authorized representative,
have original signatures, and be submitted unbound.
Each application must contain the following items in the order
listed:
Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424). Follow the
instructions below and those that accompany the form.
In Item 5 of Form 424, put DUNS number in ``Organizational DUNS:''
box.
In Item 5 of Form 424, include name, phone number, and, if
available, email and fax numbers of the contact person.
In Item 8 of Form 424, check `New.'
In Item 10 of Form 424, clearly identify the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) program title and number for the program for
which funds are being requested as stated in this funding opportunity
announcement.
In Item 11 of Form 424, identify the single funding opportunity the
application addresses.
In Item 12 of Form 424, identify the specific geographic area to be
served.
In Item 14 of Form 424, identify Congressional districts of both
the applicant and project.
Budget Information Non-Construction Programs (Form 424A) and Budget
Justification.
Follow the instructions provided here and those in Section V.
Application Review Information.
Description--Please see Section V.1. Criteria, for instructions on
preparing the project summary/abstract and the full project
description.
Proof of non-profit status (if applicable). Please see Section
III.3 Other Eligibility for ways to demonstrate non-profit status.
Indirect cost rate agreement. If claiming indirect costs, provide
documentation that applicant currently has an indirect cost rate
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or
another cognizant Federal agency.
Letters of agreement and memoranda of understanding. If applicable,
include a letter of commitment or Memorandum of Understanding from each
partner and/or sub-contractor describing their role, detailing specific
tasks to be performed, and expressing commitment to participate if the
proposed project is funded.
Match. Provide a letter of commitment verifying the actual amount
of the non-Federal share of project costs (see Section III.2).
General Content and Form information: The application limit is 75
pages total including all forms and attachments. Pages over this page
limit will be removed from the application and will not be reviewed.
The application must be typed, double spaced, printed on only one
side, with at least \1/2\ inch margins on each side and 1 inch at the
top and bottom, using standard 12 Point fonts (such as Times New Roman
or Courier). Pages must be numbered.
All copies of an application must be submitted in a single package,
and a separate package must be submitted for each funding opportunity.
The package must be clearly labeled for the specific funding
opportunity it is addressing.
Because each application will be duplicated, do not use or include
separate covers, binders, clips, tabs, plastic inserts, maps,
brochures, or any other items that cannot be processed easily on a
photocopy machine with an automatic feed. Do not bind, clip, staple, or
fasten in any way separate subsections of the application, including
supporting documentation; however, each complete copy must be stapled
securely in the upper left corner. Applicants are advised that the
copies of the application submitted, not the original, will be
reproduced by the Federal government for review.
Tips for Preparing a Competitive Application. It is essential that
applicants read the entire announcement package carefully before
preparing an application and include all of the required application
forms and attachments. The application must reflect a thorough
understanding of the purpose and objectives of the applicable
legislation. Reviewers expect applicants to understand the goals of the
legislation and the Children's Bureau's interest in each topic. A
``responsive application'' is one that addresses all of the evaluation
criteria in ways that demonstrate this understanding. Applications that
are considered to be ``unresponsive'' generally receive very low scores
and are rarely funded.
The Children's Bureau's Web site (https://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/
cb) provides a wide range of information and links to other relevant
Web sites. Before you begin preparing an application, we suggest that
you learn more about the mission and programs of the Children's Bureau
by exploring the Web site.
Organizing Your Application. The specific evaluation criteria in
Section V of this funding announcement will be used to review and
evaluate each application. The applicant should address each of these
specific evaluation criteria in the project description. Applicants
should organize their project description in this sequence: (1)
Objectives and Need for Assistance; (2) Approach; (3) Organizational
Profiles; (4) Budget and Budget Justification; and should use the same
headings as these criteria, so that reviewers can readily find
information that directly addresses each of the specific review
criteria.
Project Evaluation Plan. Project evaluations are very important. If
you do not have the in-house capacity to conduct an objective,
comprehensive evaluation of the project, then the Children's Bureau
advises that you propose contracting with a third-party evaluator
specializing in social science or evaluation, or a university or
college, to conduct the evaluation. A skilled evaluator can assist you
in designing a data collection strategy that is appropriate for the
evaluation of your proposed project. Additional assistance may be found
in a document titled ``Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation.'' A copy
of this document can be accessed at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/
opre/other_resrch/pm_guide_eval/reports/pmguide/pmguide_toc.html.
[[Page 35091]]
Logic Model. A logic model is a tool that presents the conceptual
framework for a proposed project and explains the linkages among
program elements. While there are many versions of the logic model,
they generally summarize the logical connections among the needs that
are the focus of the project, project goals and objectives, the target
population, project inputs (resources), the proposed activities/
processes/outputs directed toward the target population, the expected
short- and long-term outcomes the initiative is designed to achieve,
and the evaluation plan for measuring the extent to which proposed
processes and outcomes actually occur. Information on the development
of logic models is available on the Internet at https://www.uwex.edu/
ces/pdande/ or https://www.extension.iastate.edu/cyfar/capbuilding/
outcome/outcome_logicmdir.html.
Project Use of Human Subjects. If your evaluation plan includes
gathering data from or about clients, there are specific procedures
which must be followed in order to protect their privacy and ensure the
confidentiality of the information about them. Applicants planning to
gather such data are asked to describe their plans regarding an
Institutional Review Board (IRB) review. If applicable, applicants must
include a completed Form 310, Protection of Human Subjects. For more
information about use of human subjects and IRB's you can visit these
Web sites: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_chapter2.htm#d2 and https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/ictips.htm.
You may submit your application to us in either electronic or paper
format. To submit an application electronically, please use the https://
www.Grants.gov apply site. If you use Grants.gov, you will be able to
download a copy of the application package, complete it off-line, and
then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov site. You may
not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant application to us.
Please note the following if you plan to submit your application
electronically via Grants.Gov
Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly
encouraged.
When you enter the Grants.Gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation. We strongly recommend that you
do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the
application process through Grants.Gov.
To use Grants.gov, you, as the applicant, must have a DUNS
Number and register in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). You
should allow a minimum of five days to complete the CCR registration.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit a grant application in electronic format, nor will we penalize
you if you submit an application in paper format.
You may submit all documents electronically, including all
information typically included on the SF 424 and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
Your application must comply with any page limitation
requirements described in this program announcement.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgement from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The Administration for Children and
Families will retrieve your application from Grants.gov.
We may request that you provide original signatures on
forms at a later date.
You may access the electronic application for this program
on www.Grants.gov.
You must search for the downloadable application package
by the CFDA number.
Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with
their applications the survey located under ``Grant Related Documents
and Forms,'' ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Applicants,''
titled, ``Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants,'' at:
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Standard Forms and Certifications
Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement
must file the Standard Form (SF) 424, Application for Federal
Assistance; SF-424A, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs; SF-
424B, Assurances--Non-Construction Programs. The forms may be
reproduced for use in submitting applications. Applicants must sign and
return the standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish prior to award an executed copy of the
Standard Form LLL, Certification Regarding Lobbying, when applying for
an award in excess of $100,000. Applicants who have used non-Federal
funds for lobbying activities in connection with receiving assistance
under this announcement shall complete a disclosure form, if
applicable, with their applications (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control number 0348-0046). Applicants must
sign and return the certification with their application.
Applicants must also understand they will be held accountable for
the smoking prohibition included within Pub. L. 103-227, Title XII
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also known as the PRO-KIDS Act of 1994). A
copy of the Federal Register notice which implements the smoking
prohibition is included with forms. By signing and submitting the
application, applicants are providing the certification and need not
mail back the certification with the application.
Applicants must make the appropriate certification of their
compliance with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. By
signing and submitting the applications, applicants are providing the
certification and need not mail back the certification form. Complete
the standard forms and the associated certifications and assurances
based on the instructions on the forms. The forms and certifications
may be found at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Those organizations required to provide proof of non-profit status,
please refer to Section III.3.
Please see Section V.1, for instructions on preparing the full
project description.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Explanation of Due Dates: The closing time and date for receipt of
applications is 4:30 p.m. (Eastern Time Zone) on the date noted above.
Mailed or hand carried applications received after 4:30 p.m. on the
closing date will be classified as late.
Deadline: Mailed applications shall be considered as meeting an
announced deadline if they are received on or before the deadline time
and date at the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon Group, Inc.,
ATTN: Children's Bureau, 118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC 20002-2132.
Applicants are responsible for mailing applications well in advance,
when using all mail services, to ensure that the applications are
received on or before the deadline time and date.
Applications hand carried by applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers
shall be considered as meeting an announced deadline if they are
received on or before the deadline date, between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 4 p.m., e.s.t., at the ACYF Operations Center, c/o The Dixon Group,
Inc., ATTN: Children's Bureau, 118 Q Street NE., Washington, DC 20002-
2132, between Monday and Friday (excluding Federal holidays).
[[Page 35092]]
This address must appear on the envelope/package containing the
application with the note. Applicants are cautioned that express/
overnight mail services do not always deliver as agreed.
Late applications: Applications which do not meet the criteria
above are considered late applications. ACF shall notify each late
applicant that its application will not be considered in the current
competition. Any application received after 4:30 p.m. on the deadline
date will not be considered for competition. Applicants using express/
overnight mail services should allow two working days prior to the
deadline date for receipt of applications. (Applicants are cautioned
that express/overnight mail services do not always deliver as agreed).
Extension of deadlines: ACF may extend application deadlines when
circumstances such as acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur, or
when there are widespread disruptions of mail service, or in other rare
cases. A determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests
with the Chief Grants Management Officer.
Required Documents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What to submit Required content Required form or format When to submit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Abstract..................... See Section IV and V... Format described in By application due
Section IV and V. date.
Project Narrative.................... See Section IV and V... Format described in By application due
Section IV and V. date.
SF424................................ See Section IV......... Format described in By application due
Section IV. date.
SF424A............................... See Section IV......... Format described in By application due
Section IV. date.
SF424B............................... See Section IV......... Format described in By application due
Section IV. date.
Assurances and Certifications........ See Section IV......... Format described in By Time of Award.
Section IV.
Proof of Non-profit status, if See Section III and IV. Format described in By Time of Award.
applicable. Section III.
Indirect Cost rate Agreement, if See Section IV......... Format described in IV. By Time of Award.
applicable.
Letters of commitment from partner See Section IV......... Format described in IV. By Time of Award.
organizations, if applicable.
Non-Federal Commitment Letter........ See Section III.2...... See Section III.2...... By Time of Award.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Forms: Private, nonprofit organizations are encouraged
to submit with their applications the survey located under ``Grant
Related Documents and Forms'' titled ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit
Grant Applicants'' at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What to submit Required content Required form or format When to submit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Per required form...... May be found on https:// With application.
Applicants. www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Intergovernmental Review
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under Executive Order 12372,
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,'' and 45 CFR Part 100,
``Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services
Programs and Activities.'' Under the Order, States may design their own
processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed Federal assistance
under covered programs.
As of October 1, 2004, the following jurisdictions have elected to
participate in the Executive Order process: Arkansas, California,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa,
Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New
Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa, Guam,
North Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. As these
jurisdictions have elected to participate in the Executive Order
process, they have established SPOCs. Applicants from participating
jurisdictions should contact their SPOC, as soon as possible, to alert
them of prospective applications and receive instructions. Applicants
must submit all required materials, if any, to the SPOC and indicate
the date of this submittal (or the date of contact if no submittal is
required) on the Standard Form 424, item 16a.
Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has 60 days from the application
deadline to comment on proposed new or competing continuation awards.
SPOCs are encouraged to eliminate the submission of routine
endorsements as official recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs are
requested to clearly differentiate between mere advisory comments and
those official State process recommendations which may trigger the
``accommodate or explain'' rule.
When comments are submitted directly to ACF, they should be
addressed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Grants Management,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 4th
floor, Washington, DC 20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions have chosen not to participate
in the process, entities that meet the eligibility requirements of the
program are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a State,
Territory, Commonwealth, etc. does not have a SPOC. Therefore,
applicants from these jurisdictions, or for projects administered by
federally-recognized Indian Tribes, need take no action in regard to
E.O. 12372.
The official list, including addresses, of the jurisdictions
elected to participate in E.O. 12372 can be found on the following URL:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
[[Page 35093]]
5. Funding Restrictions
Grant awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Construction is not an allowable activity or expenditure under this
solicitation.
Applicants should note that grants to be awarded under this program
announcement are subject to the availability of funds. The size of the
actual awards will vary.
Because this is a training grant, indirect costs used for these
projects shall not exceed 8 percent. Funds from this grant cannot be
used to match Title IV-E training funds.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Submission by Mail: An Application must provide an original
application with all attachments, signed by an authorized
representative and two copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an
explanation of due dates. Applications should be mailed to: ACYF
Operations Center, The Dixon Group, 118 Q St. NE., Washington, DC
20002-2132, Attention: Children's Bureau.
Hand Delivery: An Applicant must provide an original application
with all attachments signed by an authorized representative and two
copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an explanation of due dates.
Applications should be delivered to: ACYF Operations Center, The Dixon
Group, 118 Q St. NE, Washington, DC 20002-2132, Attention: Children's
Bureau.
Electronic Submission: https://www.grants.gov Please see section
IV.2 Content and Form of Application Submission, for guidelines and
requirements when submitting applications electronically.
V. Application Review Information
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 40 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed and
reviewing the collection information.
The project description is approved under OMB control number 0970-
0139 which expires 4/30/2007.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The following are instructions and guidelines on how to prepare the
``Project Summary/Abstract'' and ``Full Project Description'' sections
of the application. Under the evaluation criteria section, note that
each criterion is preceded by the generic evaluation requirement under
the ACF Uniform Project Description (UPD).
1. Criteria
General Instructions
ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions
that focus on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended
performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of
substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits are
not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than repetition.
Supporting information concerning activities that will not be directly
funded by the grant or information that does not directly pertain to an
integral part of the grant funded activity should be placed in an
appendix. Pages should be numbered and a table of contents should be
included for easy reference.
Introduction
Applicants required to submit a full project description shall
prepare the project description statement in accordance with the
following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation
criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what your project
description should include while the evaluation criteria identifies the
measures that will be used to evaluate applications.
Project/Summary Abstract
Provide a summary of the project description (a page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
Objectives and Need for Assistance
Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial,
institutional, and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need
for assistance must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate
objectives of the project must be clearly stated; supporting
documentation, such as letters of support and testimonials from
concerned interests other than the applicant, may be included. Any
relevant data based on planning studies should be included or referred
to in the endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate demographic data and
participant/beneficiary information, as needed. In developing the
project description, the applicant may volunteer or be requested to
provide information on the total range of projects currently being
conducted and supported (or to be initiated), some of which may be
outside the scope of the program announcement.
Approach
Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how
the proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or
activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might
accelerate or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the
proposed approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of
the project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in
cost or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement.
Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the
accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such
terms as the number of people to be served and the number of activities
accomplished.
When accomplishments cannot be quantified by activity or function,
list them in chronological order to show the schedule of
accomplishments and their target dates. If any data is to be collected,
maintained, and/or disseminated, clearance may be required from the
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This clearance pertains to
any ``collection of information that is conducted or sponsored by
ACF.'' List organizations, cooperating entities, consultants, or other
key individuals who will work on the project along with a short
description of the nature of their effort or contribution.
Organizational Profiles
Provide information on the applicant organization(s) and
cooperating partners, such as organizational charts, financial
statements, audit reports or statements from CPAs/Licensed Public
Accountants, Employer Identification Numbers, names of bond carriers,
contact persons and telephone numbers, child care licenses and other
documentation of professional accreditation, information on compliance
with Federal/State/local government standards, documentation of
experience in the program area, and other pertinent information. If the
applicant is a non-profit organization, submit proof of non-profit
status in its application. The non-profit agency can accomplish this by
providing: (a) A reference to the applicant organization's listing in
the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt
organizations described in the IRS Code; (b) a copy of a currently
valid IRS tax exemption certificate, (c) a statement from a State
taxing body, State attorney general, or other appropriate State
official certifying that the applicant organization has a non-profit
status and
[[Page 35094]]
that none of the net earnings accrue to any private shareholders or
individuals; (d) a certified copy of the organization's certificate of
incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes non-profit
status, (e) any of the items immediately above for a State or national
parent organization and a statement signed by the parent organization
that the applicant organization is a local non-profit affiliate.
Budget and Budget Justification
Provide a budget with line item detail and detailed calculations
for each budget object class identified on the Budget Information form.
Detailed calculations must include estimation methods, quantities, unit
costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the
calculation to be duplicated. Also include a breakout by the funding
sources identified in Block 15 of the SF-424. Provide a narrative
budget justification that describes how the categorical costs are
derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness, and allocability of the
proposed costs.
General
Use the following guidelines for preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and non-Federal resources shall be detailed
and justified in the budget and narrative justification. ``Federal
resources'' refers only to the ACF grant for which you are applying.
``Non Federal resources'' are all other Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget amounts and computations be
presented in a columnar format: first column, object class categories;
second column, Federal budget; next column(s), non-Federal budget(s),
and last column, total budget. The budget justification should be a
narrative.
Personnel
Description: Costs of employee salaries and wages. Justification:
Identify the project director or principal investigator, if known. For
each staff person, provide the title, time commitment to the project
(in months), time commitment to the project (as a percentage or full-
time equivalent), annual salary, grant salary, wage rates, etc. Do not
include the costs of consultants or personnel costs of delegate
agencies or of specific project(s) or businesses to be financed by the
applicant.
Fringe Benefits
Description: Costs of employee fringe benefits unless treated as
part of an approved indirect cost rate. Justification: Provide a
breakdown of the amounts and percentages that comprise fringe benefit
costs such as health insurance, FICA, retirement insurance, taxes, etc.
Travel
Description: Costs of project-related travel by employees of the
applicant organization (does not include costs of consultant travel).
Justification: For each trip, show the total number of traveler(s),
travel destination, duration of trip, per diem, mileage allowances, if
privately owned vehicles will be used, and other transportation costs
and subsistence allowances. Travel costs for key staff to attend ACF-
sponsored workshops should be detailed in the budget.
Equipment
Description: ``Equipment'' means an article of nonexpendable,
tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year
and an acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of (a) the
capitalization level established by the organization for the financial
statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note: Acquisition cost means the
net invoice unit price of an item of equipment, including the cost of
any modifications, attachments, accessories, or auxiliary apparatus
necessary to make it usable for the purpose for which it is acquired.
Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty, protective in-transit
insurance, freight, and installation shall be included in or excluded
from acquisition cost in accordance with the organization's regular
written accounting practices.) Justification: For each type of
equipment requested, provide a description of the equipment, the cost
per unit, the number of units, the total cost, and a plan for use on
the project, as well as use or disposal of the equipment after the
project ends. An applicant organization that uses its own definition
for equipment should provide a copy of its policy or section of its
policy which includes the equipment definition.
Supplies
Description: Costs of all tangible personal property other than
that included under the Equipment category. Justification: Specify
general categories of supplies and their costs. Show computations and
provide other information which supports the amount requested.
Contractual
Description: Costs of all contracts for services and goods except
for those that belong under other categories such as equipment,
supplies, construction, etc. Include third party evaluation contracts
(if applicable) and contracts with secondary recipient organizations,
including delegate agencies and specific project(s) or businesses to be
financed by the applicant. Justification: Demonstrate that all
procurement transactions will be conducted in a manner to provide, to
the maximum extent practical, open and free competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are required to use Part 92
procedures, must justify any anticipated procurement action that is
expected to be awarded without competition and exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold fixed at 41 U.S.C. 403(11) (currently set at
$100,000).
Recipients might be required to make available to ACF pre-award
review and procurement documents, such as request for proposals or
invitations for bids, independent cost estimates, etc. Note: Whenever
the applicant intends to delegate part of the project to another
agency, the applicant must provide a detailed budget and budget
narrative for each delegate agency, by agency title, along with the
required supporting information referred to in these instructions.
Other
Enter the total of all other costs. Such costs, where applicable
and appropriate, may include but are not limited to insurance, food,
medical and dental costs (noncontractual), professional services costs,
space and equipment rentals, printing and publication, computer use,
training costs, such as tuition and stipends, staff development costs,
and administrative costs. Justification: Provide computations, a
narrative description and a justification for each cost under this
category.
Indirect Charges
Description: Total amount of indirect costs. This category should
be used only when the applicant currently has an indirect cost rate
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or
another cognizant Federal agency. Justification: An applicant that will
charge indirect costs to the grant must enclose a copy of the current
rate agreement. If the applicant organization is in the process of
initially developing or renegotiating a rate, upon notification that an
award will be made, it should immediately develop a tentative indirect
cost rate proposal based on its most recently completed fiscal year, in
accordance with the cognizant agency's guidelines for establishing
indirect cost rates, and
[[Page 35095]]
submit it to the cognizant agency. Applicants awaiting approval of
their indirect cost proposals may also request indirect costs. When an
indirect cost rate is requested, those costs included in the indirect
cost pool should not also be charged as direct costs to the grant.
Also, if the applicant is requesting a rate which is less than what is
allowed under the program, the authorized representative of the
applicant organization must submit a signed acknowledgement that the
applicant is accepting a lower rate than allowed.
Evaluation Criteria
The following evaluation criteria appear in weighted descending
order. The corresponding score values indicate the relative importance
that ACF places on each evaluation criterion; however, applicants need
not develop their applications precisely according to the order
presented. Application components may be organized such that a reviewer
will be able to follow a seamless and logical flow of information (e.g.
from a broad overview of the project to more detailed information about
how it will be conducted).
In considering how applicants will carry out the responsibilities
addressed under this announcement, competing applications for financial
assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the following
criteria:
Approach 50 Points
In reviewing the approach, the following factors will be
considered: (50 Points)
(1) The extent to which there is a reasonable timeline for
effectively implementing the proposed project, including major
milestones and target dates. The extent to which the project will
complete the development, field testing and revisions of the training
program in a timely manner and conduct a thorough evaluation of its
effectiveness within the 3-year project time frame.
(2) The extent to which the application proposes development of
appropriate materials and provides for effective training under the
proposed project.
(3) The extent to which the application demonstrates a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the issues related to interventions with
older youth and differences and similarities between youth-centered and
family-centered practice. The extent to which the application
demonstrates a thorough understanding of these issues in terms of the
Adoption and Safe Families Act goals of safety, permanency and well-
being of older youth and the results of the Child and Family Service
Reviews.
(4) The extent to which the application evidences a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the challenges of providing and
improving training for supervisors within a public child welfare
agency. The extent to which the proposed project would successfully
overcome these challenges.
(5) The extent to which past and/or current collaboration between
the applicant and the public (State/local and Tribal) agencies in
training of child welfare staff would strengthen this project. The
extent to which this project will be strengthened by building on
existing partnerships with such agencies. The extent to which the
applicant includes interagency agreements and commitments from the
participating entities. The extent to which there are strong links
between the proposed project, and the State's Child and Family Service
Review Program Improvement Plan.
(6) The extent to which the proposed approach to developing a
curriculum is soundly based on an appropriate conceptual framework,
research and practice experience. The extent to which this curriculum
would build on, expand and strengthen the existing curriculum
approaches/models that emphasize youth-focused services.
(7) The extent to which the application evidences a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the four core principles (youth
development, cultural competence, collaboration, and permanent
connections) and the challenges attendant to incorporating these
principles within child welfare practices.
(8) The extent to which the curriculum development and training of
supervisors will be culturally responsive to the diverse child welfare
population.
(9) The extent to which appropriate criteria would be utilized for
selection and recruitment of trainees. The extent to which there are
specific, sound, strategies for recruiting minority and Tribal agency
trainees.
(10) The extent to which there is a sound plan for evaluating the
training curriculum. The extent to which there is a sound plan for
field-testing the effectiveness of the competency-based curriculum and
modifying the curriculum, if necessary. The extent to which the
applicant clearly identifies and justifies the location of the project
and the State/local child welfare agencies where the proposed
curriculum will be field-tested. The extent to which the evaluation
will examine outcomes identified in this announcement.
(11) The extent to which there is a sound plan for dissemination of
the curriculum and project evaluation findings. The extent to which the
applicant's dissemination plan will contribute to the purposes
described in this announcement. The extent to which the dissemination
plan clearly describes what will be disseminated, to whom, how
extensive these efforts will be, and includes plans for evaluating
dissemination efforts.
(12) The extent to which there is a sound plan for continuing this
project beyond the period of Federal funding.
Organizational Profiles 20 Points
In reviewing the organizational profiles, the following factors
will be considered: (20 Points)
(1) The extent to which the application evidences sufficient
experience and expertise in developing training curricula and providing
training to child welfare agency staff in the area of youth-focused
services; in collaboration with child welfare agencies and other
appropriate entities; and in administration, development,
implementation, management, and evaluation of similar projects. The
extent to which each participating organization (including partners
and/or subcontractors) possesses the organizational capability to
fulfill their assigned roles and functions effectively (if the
application involves partnering and/or subcontracting with other
agencies/organizations).
(2) The extent to which the proposed project director and key
project staff possess sufficient relevant knowledge, experience and
capabilities to implement and manage a project of this size, scope and
complexity effectively (e.g., resume). The extent to which the role,
responsibilities and time commitments of each proposed project staff
position, including consultants, subcontractors and/or partners, are
clearly defined and appropriate to the successful implementation of the
proposed project.
(3) The extent to which there is a sound management plan for
achieving the objectives of the proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines and
milestones for accomplishing project tasks and ensuring quality. The
extent to which the plan clearly defines the role and responsibilities
of the lead agency. The extent to which the plan clearly describes the
effective management and coordination of activities carried out by any
partners, subcontractors and
[[Page 35096]]
consultants (if applicable). The extent to which there would be a
mutually beneficial relationship between the proposed project and other
work planned, anticipated or underway with Federal assistance by the
applicant.
Objectives and Need for Assistance 20 Points
In reviewing the objectives and need for assistance, the following
factors will be considered: (20 Points)
(1) The extent to which the application demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the need for a specific curriculum and training to
strengthen child welfare supervisors' capacity to prepare and guide
staff in their work with older youth involved in the child welfare
system.
(2) The extent to which the application demonstrates a thorough
knowledge and understanding of the issues faced by older youth involved
in the child welfare system and appropriate intervention approaches for
working with these youth.
(3) The extent to which the proposed project's goals (end products
of an effective project) and objectives (measurable steps for reaching
these goals) clearly and appropriately relate to the training needs of
public child welfare agency frontline workers and supervisory staff.
(4) The extent to which the proposed project would produce
significant results and benefits by developing, field testing,
delivering, evaluating and disseminating a youth-focused training
curriculum for supervisors.
(5) The extent to which an appropriate group of trainees and a
reasonable number of trainees will be trained over the life of the
project.
(6) The extent to which the lessons learned from the project will
clearly and significantly benefit policy, practice and theory
development in addressing older youth's transition needs, issues and
crises.
Budget and Budget Justification 10 Points
In reviewing the budget and budget justification, the following
factors will be considered: (10 Points)
(1) The extent to which the costs of the proposed project are
clearly identified, justified and reasonable, in view of the activities
to be conducted and expected results and benefits.
(2) The extent to which the applicant's fiscal controls and
accounting procedures would ensure prudent use, proper and timely
disbursement and accurate accounting of funds received under this
program announcement.
2. Review and Selection Process
Since ACF will be using non-Federal reviewers in the review
process, applicants have the option of omitting from the application
copies (not the original) of specific salary rates or amounts for
individuals specified in the application budget.
No grant award will be made under this announcement on the basis of
an incomplete application.
A panel of at least three reviewers (primarily experts from outside
the Federal government) will use the evaluation criteria described in
this announcement to evaluate each application. The reviewers will
determine the strengths and weaknesses of each application, provide
comments about the strengths and weaknesses and give each application a
numerical score.
The results of the competitive review are a primary factor in
making funding decisions. In addition, Federal staff conducts
administrative reviews of the applications and, in light of the results
of the competitive review, will recommend applications for funding to
the ACYF Commissioner. ACYF reserves the option of discussing
applications with other funding sources when this is in the best
interest of t