American Indian-Alaska Native Head Start Research Center, 24057-24068 [05-9073]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
VIII. Other Information
Notice: Beginning with FY 2006, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) will no longer publish
grant announcements in the Federal
Register. Beginning October 1, 2005,
applicants will be able to find a
synopsis of all ACF grant opportunities
and apply electronically for
opportunities via: https://
www.Grants.gov. Applicants will also be
able to find the complete text of all ACF
grant announcements on the ACF Web
site located at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
grants/.
The FY 2006 President’s Budget does
not include or propose funding for the
Community Services Block Grant
Program.
Additional information about this
program and its purpose can be located
on the following Web site: https://
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ocs.
Dated: April 29, 2005.
Josephine B. Robinson,
Director, Office of Community Services.
[FR Doc. 05–9123 Filed 5–5–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
American Indian—Alaska Native Head
Start Research Center
Program Office: Office of Planning,
Research and Evaluation (OPRE).
Funding Opportunity Title: American
Indian-Alaska Native Head StartResearch Center.
Announcement Type: Cooperative
Agreement—Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2005–ACF–OPRE–YF–0067.
CFDA Number: 93.600.
Due Date for Letter of Intent or
Preapplications: 6/3/2005.
Due Date for Applications: 7/1/2005.
Executive Summary: Funds are
provided for the creation of an
American Indian Alaska Native (AI–AN)
Head Start Research Center that will
provide leadership and collaborate with
researchers with diverse areas of
expertise in order to facilitate early
childhood research within the Head
Start AI–AN context, engage in capacity
building, and establish model research
partnerships between local researchers,
Head Start American Indian Alaska
Native program staff and members of
tribal communities.
This cooperative agreement is part of
a larger Head Start research effort. Three
other grant funding mechanisms are
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
being offered concurrently with the one
described in this announcement. They
include: (1) American Indian-Alaska
Native Head Start Research Center, (2)
Head Start Graduate Student Research
Grants, and (3) Head Start Graduate
Student Research Partnership
Development Grants. For more
information, please see these other Head
Start Research announcements listed in
the Federal Register or listed on http:/
/www.Grants.gov.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Purpose
The purpose of this opportunity is to
fund an American Indian Alaska Native
Head Start Research Center that will
provide leadership and offer support in
the development and facilitation of local
research, and strengthen the ability of
local researchers to conduct model
research projects (based in universities
and other non-profit research
institutions) in collaboration with Head
Start American Indian, Alaska Native
program staff and members of tribal
communities. The Center is expected to
engage in a variety of activities that are
designed to promote excellence in early
childhood research, make a significant
contribution to the knowledge base,
improve research capacity, and provide
leadership and support for research on
the early development of American
Indian Alaska Native children. The
successful applicant should be aware of
and be able to collaborate with local
researchers who are conversant with
tribal communities; be familiar with the
available strengths and needs of tribal
communities; be knowledgeable of the
particular histories of tribal Head Start
programs; and be able to build the trust
and support of local tribes so they may
become valuable partners in developing
research goals and questions.
The Center will also be responsible
for assuring that each successful
partnership will be able to provide
evidence that the research projects are
developing information to improve the
early learning environments for
American Indian Alaska Native Head
Start children. Therefore, such
affiliations necessitate that researchers
become familiar with the goals and
approaches of existing AI–AN Head
Start programs.
It is expected that the lessons learned
from model partnerships will then be
shared with the larger research
community, both through the Head Start
network and by other means. Examples
of approaches and lessons learned from
these partnerships that could be shared
include, but are not limited to:
methodological approaches for
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24057
sampling; assessment and analysis at
the local program level; plans for
reporting data to teachers, parents, and
management staff; integrated curricular
and assessment approaches; and
professional development approaches
including coursework and training
materials.
B. Statutory Authority
Section 649 of the Head Start Act, as
amended by the Coats Human Services
Reauthorization Act of 1998 (Pub. L.
105–285) codified at 42 U.S.C. 9844.
C. Background
The American Indian Alaska Native
Program Branch funds Head Start and
Early Head Start programs operated by
tribes, consortia, and/or corporations.
The majority of grantees serve and
reside on tribal reservations. Generally,
grants are awarded to tribal
governments, with tribal presidents,
governors, executive directors or
administrators as authorizing officials.
American Indian and Alaska Native
(AI–AN) Head Start programs reflect the
diversity of languages and traditions
that exist in AI–AN cultures. Substantial
numbers of children served by the AI–
AN Branch speak an American Indian
language or language other than English
or Spanish as their dominant language.
The programs vary greatly in size, with
the smallest grantee serving about 15
children and the largest, more than
4,000 children and families. The
programs also are geographically
diverse, and are located in isolated rural
settings as well as in urban areas. AI–
AN grantees provide comprehensive
services to children and families
through center and home-based options,
as well as combinations and locally
designed configurations.
Historically, the diversity of many
different tribes participating in Head
Start has posed methodological
challenges to their inclusion in
nationally representative samples for
evaluation research. For instance,
current national research and evaluation
activities of Head Start, such as the
Family and Child Experiences Survey
(FACES) and the Head Start Impact
Study, exclude tribal programs from the
population eligible for inclusion in the
samples.
While there are reporting challenges
that are unique to AI–AN populations,
Tribal Head Start programs have the
same performance standards and
requirements for assessing program
outcomes as other Head Start programs.
However, there is little prior research
evidence available to provide guidance
to programs about effective
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
24058
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
instructional, service delivery, or
assessment approaches in tribal settings.
American Indian and Alaska Native
Head Start programs need to be
included in Head Start Bureau efforts to
enhance the quality of Head Start
programming, and to improve
accountability by strengthening
screening and assessment of child
outcomes and program monitoring.
There is a need, however, to provide
leadership and guidance in order to
increase the evidence base and provide
direction for program enhancements,
and such activities must be conducted
in a manner that takes into account the
unique cultural values of tribes
implementing Head Start programs.
For historical and ethical reasons
tribal communities must have a
significant voice in how research is
designed and conducted in those
settings. To support the development
and implementation of research within
and by tribal communities, ACF
undertook in FY2002 an effort to
document the existing knowledge base
concerning early childhood
programming and assessment in tribal
settings, and to collect information on
the research needs and priorities of
tribal Head Start programs. Little was
known about what research was
currently being conducted by tribal
Head Start programs, what the
experiences of tribal programs in
research partnerships with colleges and
universities had been, and how ACF
might support these partnerships. The
project resulted in a review and
synthesis of available research
literature, both published and
unpublished, that pertained to young
children and families in American
Indian and Alaska Native populations.
That report is available online at:
https://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/
core/ongoing_research/hs/hs_aian_
report.html.
A second part of this effort was to
conduct a series of visits to tribes to
assess their own views about the
following questions: (1) What kind of
research is needed and desired in tribal
Head Start settings; (2) what outcomes
are important for American Indian and
Alaska Native Head Start; (3) what
programmatic and service delivery
issues need to be studied; and (4) what
are the issues in conducting research
among American Indian and Alaska
Native populations? Visits were
arranged with 19 tribes to conduct
‘‘listening sessions’’ with tribal
leadership, Head Start personnel, Head
Start family members, and other
community stakeholders. Other sessions
were held in conjunction with national
meetings of American Indian Alaska
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Native Head Start grantees and technical
assistance staff.
These efforts documented the scarcity
of existing research that directly informs
early childhood programming for
American Indian and Alaska Native
children and families. Few studies have
taken into account the unique cultural
and linguistic characteristics of the AI–
AN population, and existing studies
tend to be small, methodologically
weak, and of limited generalizability to
other surroundings. There is a need to
develop the capacity for early childhood
research in tribal settings both to
improve the ability of tribal members
themselves to initiate research projects
and to increase the number of qualified
individuals who have the ability to
effectively partner with tribes to
implement research.
At the same time, there is widespread
recognition within tribal communities
of the need for culturally relevant
research, as well as substantial support
among tribal members for research that
will advance the knowledge base and
improve the lives of the children and
families who are served by Head Start
in their communities. Indeed, tribal
communities have affirmed that they
must have a significant voice in how the
research is designed and conducted
among their members. Cultural issues
must be addressed in the development
of methodologies, study procedures, and
data collection instruments for use in
conducting research among tribal Head
Start programs. Differences among
American Indian-Alaskan Native groups
must be acknowledged and respected in
developing the methodology and
conducting the research. In addition to
Head Start personnel, tribal leaders and
community elders often must be part of
the process in designing and conducting
research in tribal settings.
Building on the needs identified both
by participants in the listening sessions,
and other consultants, this
announcement is intended to ensure
that future research is responsive to the
changing needs of American IndianAlaska Native children and families,
and that researchers who are focusing
on early childhood research within
tribal communities are provided with
the necessary leadership and support for
capacity building that is currently
needed. Therefore, Head Start’s
commitment to a partnership between
researchers and a national AI–AN Head
Start Research Center is essential. The
unique relationship forged between the
Center, the researcher and the tribal
community within the Head Start and
early childhood research context will
serve as a model for the establishment
of other partnerships within the
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
community (e.g., researcher-Head Start
staff, researcher-family, etc.). This
foundation will help bolster the skills
necessary to build on early childhood
research paradigms by fostering
successful collaborations between the
AI–AN population and the scientific
community.
Thus, the goal of the Head Start
American Indian Alaska Native
Research Center is to pull together
researchers with diverse areas of
expertise that will focus on early
childhood research within the Head
Start context, as well as in tribal
communities as a whole. It is
anticipated that the Center will make a
significant contribution to the
knowledge base and support the
research on the early development of
American Indian-Alaska Native children
and families. The types of topics that
have previously been identified as
particularly relevant to research within
AI–AN settings are listed below; the
Center may wish to propose other
relevant topics as well.
• Identifying and addressing the
unique characteristics and needs of
American Indian and Alaska Native
Head Start children and families that
may affect learning;
• Examining the role of Head Start in
promoting and maintaining native
languages and culture by documenting
and addressing cultural diversity within
tribal Head Start settings;
• Comparing outcomes for bilingual
children vs. English-only speakers;
• Investigating long-term outcomes
for AI–AN Head Start children,
including studies of factors that promote
or inhibit the successful transition to
school and studies that compare
outcomes for AI–AN Head Start
children with those for other Head Start
children;
• Comparing tribal Head Start
children to non-tribal children;
• Studying the effectiveness of
instructional practices tailored to the
unique characteristics of tribal children
that promote school readiness;
• Documenting and assessing the
availability of resources to meet unique
tribal needs;
• Evaluating programs that are aimed
at health and development, including
health delivery models as well as
preventive programs for adverse health
and mental health outcomes;
• Exploring staff development issues,
including wage and benefit
comparability between AI–AN and nontribal early childhood educators, causes
of staff turnover, ways to retain staff,
identification of staff members’
academic and non-academic skills that
best promote child development within
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
a cultural context, and providing staff
development opportunities in
geographically isolated communities;
• Developing and utilizing culturally
appropriate screening, assessment, and
outcome measures;
• Building and promoting methods
for enhancing communication and
cooperation among Head Start
personnel, parents, tribal governments,
and school district personnel;
• Identifying special needs among
AI–AN Head Start children, and
recommending and testing, or
developing and evaluating programs for
addressing them;
• Examining the effectiveness of
methods for enhancing parent
involvement, including promotion of
knowledge about child development
among parents, promotion of adult
literacy, and promotion of father
involvement;
• Investigating the impact of adverse
conditions on child development,
including geographic isolation and
poverty, adverse family circumstances
such as domestic violence or substance
abuse, and historical experiences of
racism and discrimination of AI–AN
culture; and
• Promoting professional and
educational opportunities for
undergraduates, pre-doctoral and
medical students, residents, postdoctoral trainees and senior scholars
who are interested in AI–AN research.
The Center will advance the research
field and Head Start by facilitating
capacity building with local researchers,
scholars, American Indian Alaska
Native Head Start staff, tribal
authorities, tribal communities and
families. The objectives of the project
are to: (1) Create a national research
center that will contribute to the
knowledge base on early development
of American Indian Alaska Native
children and families within the Head
Start program; (2) support local research
projects that focus on the development
of young children and families in
American Indian and Alaska Native
Head Start and Early Head Start
programs; and (3) build capacity and
promote partnerships between the local
research community and Head Start
tribal communities.
The Center will achieve this by
facilitating and supporting the
development of partnership
opportunities between researchers, and
AI–AN Head Start communities in order
to begin to build a portfolio of research
projects related to early childhood
development in AI–AN settings. It is
expected that a working consortium of
researchers will be established that will
identify and further develop particular
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
research approaches targeted toward
better describing the unique
characteristics and developmental needs
of American Indian Alaska Native
children and their families, evaluating
or enhancing program practices, and
developing approaches to outcomes
assessment based on the needs of the
population served. The Center and
consortium will develop research
activities and topics that are decided
through the cooperative agreement
between OPRE, the Center and in
consultation with the AI–AN Head Start
staff and other tribal stakeholders that
have agreed to participate in research
projects, and that clearly reflect the
interests of the American Indian Alaska
Native Head Start programs and
communities. Note that all studies,
reports, proposals, and data produced or
developed with federal funds under
Head Start American Indian-Native
Alaskan Research Center Program ‘‘shall
become the property of the United
States.’’ pursuant to Section 649(f) of the
Head Start Act, 42 U.S.C. 9844.
The types of activities that may be
undertaken to support the development
of research partnerships include, but are
not limited to: providing financial
support through competitions or other
selection mechanisms to research
projects that will be undertaken through
partnerships between research
institutions and AI–AN Head Start
communities; supporting or augmenting
research projects already in
development or underway in AI–AN
settings; piloting or implementing
specific research projects with AI–AN
Head Start communities; and providing
training or career development
opportunities to build research capacity
for AI–AN Head Start communities.
Significant involvement in the planning
and implementation of all activities by
the AI–AN Head Start communities
themselves will be an important feature.
Although applicants are expected to
propose specific activities for
accomplishing the goals of the project,
final work plans will be developed in
conjunction with ACF and Head Start
staff.
Priority Area
1. Description.
II. Award Information
Funding Instrument Type:
Cooperative Agreement.
Substantial Involvement with
Cooperative Agreement: ACF expects to
work closely with the organization that
receives funding to ensure monies are
used appropriately and in the most
effective manner possible and that the
services and activities included in the
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24059
approved application address the
establishment of a consortium of local
research partners and that the needs of
the research partners and the American
Indian Alaska Native communities be
clearly stated in an efficient, effective,
and timely manner. Therefore, the
organization selected to receive the
award will be responsible for
implementing activities specified in a
work plan that will be jointly developed
by the Center and staff from OPRE, in
consultation with the Head Start
Bureau.
Anticipated Total Priority Area
Funding: $800,000.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 1.
Ceiling on Amount of Individual
Awards: $800,000 per budget period.
Floor on Amount of Individual
Awards: None.
Average Projected Award Amount:
$800,000 per budget period.
Length of Project Periods: 36 month
project with three 12 month budget
periods.
The Federal share of project costs
shall not exceed $800,000 for the first
12-month budget period inclusive of
indirect costs and shall not exceed
$1,000,000 per year for the second
through third 12-month budget periods.
An application that exceeds the upper
value of the dollar range specified will
be considered ‘‘non-responsive’’ and be
returned to the applicant without
further review. The project period will
be up to three years. The initial award
will be for the first one-year budget
period. Requests for a second and/or
third year of funding within the project
period should be identified in the
current application (on SF–424A), but
such requests will be considered in
subsequent years on a noncompetitive
basis, subject to the applicant’s
eligibility status, the availability of
funds, satisfactory progress of the
grantee, and a determination that
continued funding would be in the best
interest of the Government. An
application for a continuation funded
under this award beyond the three-year
budget and three-year project period for
an additional two years will be
entertained in subsequent years on a
noncompetitive basis, subject to
availability of funds, satisfactory
progress of the grantee and a
determination that continued funding
would be in the best interest of the
Government.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
• State controlled institutions of
higher education
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
24060
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
• Non-profits having a 501(c)(3)
status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
• Non-profits that do not have a
501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than
institutions of higher education
• Private institutions of higher
education
Additional Information on Eligibility:
Applicants are universities, four-year
colleges, and not-for profit institutions
on behalf of researchers who hold a
doctorate degree or equivalent in their
respective fields. The Principal
Investigator who will head up the
Center must conduct research as a
primary professional responsibility, and
have published or have been accepted
for publication in the major peerreviewed research journals in the field
as a first author or second author.
An important element of this
announcement is the requirement that
the applicant, and any proposed
researchers that will eventually make up
the consortium, demonstrate a
partnership or partnerships with Head
Start or Early Head Start programs as
part of all research.
The application must contain a
detailed process on how the applicant
intends on awarding local research
projects and clearly communicate the
stipulation that one of the requirements
of any local Principal Investigator is a
letter of agreement from the Head Start
or Early Head Start program the local
P.I. intends on working with, certifying
that they have entered into a
partnership with the applicant and the
application has been reviewed and
approved by tribal authorities.
The Principal Investigator must agree
to attend two meetings each year. The
first is an annual grantee meeting that is
typically scheduled during the summer
or fall of each year and is held in
Washington, DC. All local P.I.’s that
make up the consortium are also
expected to attend. The second meeting
each year alternates between the
biennial Head Start National Research
Conference in Washington, DC, June
26th through June 29th, 2006 and the
biennial meeting of the Society for
Research in Child Development (SRCD).
The budget should reflect travel funds
for such purposes.
Please see section V.1 Evaluation
Criteria for further information on how
applications will be scored based on
program requirements.
Faith-based and community
organizations that meet all other
eligibility criteria are eligible to apply.
2. Cost Sharing/Matching: None.
3. Other: All applicants must have a
Dun & Bradstreet number. On June 27,
2003 the Office of Management and
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Budget published in the Federal
Register a new Federal policy
applicable to all Federal grant
applicants. The policy requires Federal
grant applicants to provide a Dun &
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number when applying
for Federal grants or cooperative
agreements on or after October 1, 2003.
The DUNS number will be required
whether an applicant is submitting a
paper application or using the
government-wide electronic portal
(https://www.Grants.gov). A DUNS
number will be required for every
application for a new award or renewal/
continuation of an award, including
applications or plans under formula,
entitlement and block grant programs,
submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization
has a DUNS number. You may acquire
a DUNS number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS number
request line on 1–866–705–5711 or you
may request a number on-line at
https://www.dnb.com.
Non-profit organizations applying for
funding are required to submit proof of
their non-profit status.
Proof of non-profit status is any one
of the following:
• A reference to the applicant
organization’s listing in the Internal
Revenue Service’s (IRS) most recent list
of tax-exempt organizations described in
the IRS Code.
• A copy of a currently valid IRS tax
exemption certificate.
• A statement from a State taxing
body, State attorney general, or other
appropriate State official certifying that
the applicant organization has a nonprofit status and that none of the net
earnings accrue to any private
shareholders or individuals.
• A certified copy of the
organization’s certificate of
incorporation or similar document that
clearly establishes non-profit status.
• Any of the items in the
subparagraphs immediately above for a
State or national parent organization
and a statement signed by the parent
organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit
affiliate.
When applying electronically we
strongly suggest you attach your proof of
non-profit status with your electronic
application.
Private, non-profit organizations are
encouraged to submit with their
applications the survey located under
‘‘Grant Related Documents and Forms,’’
‘‘Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Applicants,’’ titled, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Applicants,’’ at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Disqualification Factors: Applications
that exceed the ceiling amount will be
considered non-responsive and will not
be considered for funding under this
announcement.
Any application that fails to satisfy
the deadline requirements referenced in
Section IV.3 will be considered nonresponsive and will not be considered
for funding under this announcement.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package: Head Start Research Support
Technical Assistance Team, OPRE Grant
Review Team, Xtria, LLC, 8045 Leesburg
Pike, Suite 400, Vienna, VA 22182;
phone: 877–663–0250; e-mail:
opre@xtria.com.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission:
Letter of Intent: Those who plan to
submit an application are encouraged to
submit notice via a letter of intent by fax
or e-mail by June 3, 2005. This
information will be used only to
determine the number of expert
reviewers needed to review the
applications. Include only the following
information in this fax or e-mail: the
number and title of this announcement;
the name, address, telephone and fax
number, e-mail address of the principal
investigator(s), the fiscal agent (if
known); and the name of the university,
non-profit institution, or other
organization. Applicants should not
enclose a description of their proposed
project. Send this information to: ‘‘Head
Start Research Support Technical
Assistance Team’’ at: E-mail:
opre@xtria.com, or fax to: 1–703–356–
0472.
Application Requirements: An
original and two copies of the complete
application are required. The original
copy must include all required forms,
certifications, assurances, and
appendices, be signed by an authorized
representative, have original signatures,
and be submitted unbound. The two
additional copies of the complete
application must include all required
forms, certifications, assurances, and
appendices and must also be submitted
unbound. Applicants have the option of
omitting from the application copies
(not the original) of specific salary rates
or amounts for individuals specified in
the application budget and Social
Security Numbers, if otherwise required
for individuals. The copies may include
summary salary information.
Format and Organization. Applicants
are strongly encouraged to limit their
application to 100 pages, double-spaced,
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
with standard one-inch margins and 12point fonts. This page limit applies to
both narrative text and supporting
materials but not the Standard Federal
Forms (see list below). Applicants must
number the pages of their application
beginning with the Table of Contents.
Applicants are advised to include all
required forms and materials and to
organize these materials according to
the format, and in the order, presented
below:
a. Cover Letter.
b. Contact information sheet (see
details below).
c. Standard Federal Forms.
Standard Application for Federal
Assistance (form 424) Budget
Information—Non-construction
Programs (424A) Certifications
Regarding Lobbying Disclosures of
Lobbying Activities (if necessary);
Certification Regarding Environmental
Tobacco Smoke Assurance Regarding
Non-construction Programs (form 424B)
Assurance Regarding Protection of
Human Subjects.
d. Table of Contents.
e. Project Narrative Statement (see
details below).
f. Appendices.
Proof of Non-profit Status (see Section
V.1.F), Letter(s) of agreement with Head
Start program(s) (see details below),
Letter(s) of agreement with Head Start
Policy Council(s) (see details below),
Curriculum Vitae for Principal
Investigators.
You may submit your application to
us in either electronic or paper format.
To submit an application electronically,
please use the https://www.Grants.gov/
Apply site. If you use Grants.gov, you
will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit the
application via the Grants.gov site. ACF
will not accept grant applications via
email or facsimile transmission.
Please note the following if you plan
to submit your application
electronically via Grants.gov:
• Electronic submission is voluntary,
but strongly encouraged.
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation. We strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the application
process through Grants.gov.
• We recommend you visit Grants.gov
at least 30 days prior to filing your
application to fully understand the
process and requirements. We
encourage applicants who submit
electronically to submit well before the
closing date and time so that if
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
difficulties are encountered an applicant
can still send in a hard copy overnight.
If you encounter difficulties, please
contact the Grants.gov Help Desk at 1–
800–518–4276 to report the problem
and obtain assistance with the system.
• To use Grants.gov, you, as the
applicant, must have a DUNS Number
and register in the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR). You should allow a
minimum of five days to complete the
CCR registration.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit a grant
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you submit an
application in paper format.
• You may submit all documents
electronically, including all information
typically included on the SF 424 and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
• Your application must comply with
any page limitation requirements
described in this program
announcement.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgement from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The Administration
for Children and Families will retrieve
your application from Grants.gov.
• We may request that you provide
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
• You may access the electronic
application for this program on https://
www.Grants.gov
• You must search for the
downloadable application package by
the CFDA number.
Applicants that are submitting their
application in paper format should
submit an original and two copies of the
complete application. The original and
each of the two copies must include all
required forms, certifications,
assurances, and appendices, be signed
by an authorized representative, have
original signatures, and be submitted
unbound.
Private, non-profit organizations are
encouraged to submit with their
applications the survey located under
‘‘Grant Related Documents and Forms,’’
‘‘Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Applicants,’’ titled, ‘‘Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants,’’ at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Standard Forms and Certifications:
The project description should include
all the information requirements
described in the specific evaluation
criteria outlined in the program
announcement under Section V
Application Review Information. In
addition to the project description, the
applicant needs to complete all the
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24061
standard forms required for making
applications for awards under this
announcement.
Applicants seeking financial
assistance under this announcement
must file the Standard Form (SF) 424,
Application for Federal Assistance; SF–
424A, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs; SF–424B,
Assurances—Non-Construction
Programs. The forms may be reproduced
for use in submitting applications.
Applicants must sign and return the
standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish prior to
award an executed copy of the Standard
Form LLL, Certification Regarding
Lobbying, when applying for an award
in excess of $100,000. Applicants who
have used non-Federal funds for
lobbying activities in connection with
receiving assistance under this
announcement shall complete a
disclosure form, if applicable, with their
applications (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 0348–0046). Applicants must
sign and return the certification with
their application.
Applicants must also understand they
will be held accountable for the
smoking prohibition included within
Public Law 103–227, Title XII
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also
known as the PRO–KIDS Act of 1994).
A copy of the Federal Register notice
which implements the smoking
prohibition is included with this form.
By signing and submitting the
application, applicants are providing
the certification and need not mail back
the certification with the application.
Applicants must make the appropriate
certification of their compliance with all
Federal statutes relating to
nondiscrimination. By signing and
submitting the applications, applicants
are providing the certification and need
not mail back the certification form.
Complete the standard forms and the
associated certifications and assurances
based on the instructions on the forms.
The forms and certifications may be
found at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Those organizations required to
provide proof of non-profit status,
please refer to Section III.3.
Please see Section V.1 for instructions
on preparing the full project
description.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Due Date For Letter of Intent or
Preapplications: 06/03/2005.
Due Date for Applications: 07/01/
2005.
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
24062
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
Explanation of Due Dates
The closing time and date for receipt
of applications is referenced above.
Applications received after 4:30 p.m.
eastern time on the closing date will be
classified as late.
Deadline: Applications shall be
considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or
before the deadline time and date
referenced in Section IV.6. Applicants
are responsible for ensuring
applications are mailed or submitted
electronically well in advance of the
application due date.
Applications hand carried by
applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by
overnight/express mail couriers shall be
considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or
before the deadline date, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., eastern
time, at the address referenced in
Section IV.6., between Monday and
Friday (excluding Federal holidays).
ACF cannot accommodate
transmission of applications by
facsimile. Therefore, applications
transmitted to ACF by fax will not be
accepted regardless of date or time of
submission and time of receipt.
Late Applications: Applications that
do not meet the criteria above are
considered late applications. ACF shall
notify each late applicant that its
application will not be considered in
the current competition.
Any application received after 4:30
p.m. eastern time on the deadline date
will not be considered for competition.
Applicants using express/overnight
mail services should allow two working
days prior to the deadline date for
receipt of applications. Applicants are
cautioned that express/overnight mail
services do not always deliver as agreed.
Extension of deadlines: ACF may
extend application deadlines when
circumstances such as acts of God
(floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur, or when
there are widespread disruptions of mail
service, or in other rare cases. A
determination to extend or waive
deadline requirements rests with the
Chief Grants Management Officer.
Receipt acknowledgement for
application packages will be provided to
applicants who submit their package via
mail, courier services, or by hand
delivery. Applicants will receive an
electronic acknowledgement for
applications that are submitted via
https://www.Grants.gov.
Checklist: You may use the checklist
below as a guide when preparing your
application package.
What to submit
Required content
Required form or format
Project Abstract ................
Project Description ............
Budget Narrative/Justification.
SF424 ...............................
SF-LLL Certification Regarding Lobbying.
Certification Regarding Environmental Tobacco
Smoke.
Assurances .......................
Support Letters .................
Non-Federal Commitment
Letters.
Proof of Non-Profit Status
Assurance Regarding Protection of Human Subjects.
See Sections IV.2 and V ..
See Sections IV.2 and V ..
See Sections IV.2 and V ..
Found in Sections IV.2 and V .....................................
Found in Sections IV.2 and V .....................................
Found in Sections IV.2 and V .....................................
By application due date.
By application due date.
By application due date.
See Section IV.2 ..............
See Section IV.2 ..............
See https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm ..
See https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm ..
By application due date.
By date of award.
See Section IV.2 ..............
See https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm ..
By date of award.
See Section IV.2 ..............
IV.2 ...................................
IV.2 ...................................
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm ..........
IV.2 ..............................................................................
IV.2 ..............................................................................
By date of award.
By application due date.
By application due date.
See Section III.3 ...............
IV.2 ...................................
Found in Section III.3 ..................................................
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm ..........
By date of award.
By application due date.
Additional Forms: Private, non-profit
organizations are encouraged to submit
with their applications the survey
located under ‘‘Grant Related
Documents and Forms,’’ ‘‘Survey for
Private, Non-Profit Grant Applicants,’’
titled, ‘‘Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants,’’ at: https://
What to submit
Required content
Survey for Private, NonProfit Grant Applicants.
See form ...........................
4. Intergovernmental Review:
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ and 45 CFR part 100,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of
Department of Health and Human
Services Programs and Activities.’’
Under the Order, States may design
their own processes for reviewing and
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
Required form or format
Found
in
forms.htm.
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
When to submit
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/
commenting on proposed Federal
assistance under covered programs.
As of October 1, 2004, the following
jurisdictions have elected to participate
in the Executive Order process:
Arkansas, California, Delaware, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri,
Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa,
PO 00000
When to submit
Sfmt 4703
By application due date.
Guam, North Mariana Islands, Puerto
Rico, and Virgin Islands. As these
jurisdictions have elected to participate
in the Executive Order process, they
have established SPOCs. Applicants
from participating jurisdictions should
contact their SPOC, as soon as possible,
to alert them of prospective applications
and receive instructions. Applicants
must submit all required materials, if
any, to the SPOC and indicate the date
of this submittal (or the date of contact
if no submittal is required) on the
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
Standard Form 424, item 16a. Under 45
CFR 100.8(a)(2).
A SPOC has 60 days from the
application deadline to comment on
proposed new or competing
continuation awards. SPOCs are
encouraged to eliminate the submission
of routine endorsements as official
recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs
are requested to clearly differentiate
between mere advisory comments and
those official State process
recommendations which may trigger the
‘‘accommodate or explain’’ rule.
When comments are submitted
directly to ACF, they should be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Grants Management,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., 4th floor,
Washington, DC 20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions
have chosen not to participate in the
process, entities that meet the eligibility
requirements of the program are still
eligible to apply for a grant even if a
State, Territory, Commonwealth, etc.
does not have a SPOC. Therefore,
applicants from these jurisdictions, or
for projects administered by federallyrecognized Indian Tribes, need take no
action in regard to E.O. 12372.
The official list, including addresses,
of the jurisdictions that have elected to
participate in E.O. 12372 can be found
on the following URL: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html.
5. Funding Restrictions: Grant awards
will not allow reimbursement of preaward costs.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Submission by Mail: An applicant
must provide an original application
with all attachments, signed by an
authorized representative and two
copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an
explanation of due dates. Applications
should be mailed to: Head Start
Research Support Technical Assistance
Team, OPRE Grant Review Team, Xtria,
LLC, 8045 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400,
Vienna, VA 22182.
Hand Delivery: An applicant must
provide an original application with all
attachments signed by an authorized
representative and two copies. The
application must be received at the
address below by 4:30 p.m. eastern time
on or before the closing date.
Applications that are hand delivered
will be accepted between the hours of
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. eastern time,
Monday through Friday. Applications
should be delivered to: Head Start
Research Support Technical Assistance
Team, OPRE Grant Review Team, Xtria,
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
LLC, 8045 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400,
Vienna, VA 22182.
Electronic Submission: Please see
Section IV.2 for guidelines and
requirements when submitting
applications electronically via https://
www.Grants.gov.
V. Application Review Information
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13)
Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average 25 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining
the data needed and reviewing the
collection information.
The project description is approved
under OMB control number 0970–0139
which expires 4/30/2007.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
1. Criteria: The following are
instructions and guidelines on how to
prepare the ‘‘project summary/abstract’’
and ‘‘full project description’’ sections
of the application. Under the evaluation
criteria section, note that each criterion
is preceded by the generic evaluation
requirement under the ACF Uniform
Project Description (UPD).
Part 1—The Project Description
Overview
Purpose
The project description provides a
major means by which an application is
evaluated and ranked to compete with
other applications for available
assistance. The project description
should be concise and complete and
should address the activity for which
Federal funds are being requested.
Supporting documents should be
included where they can present
information clearly and succinctly. In
preparing your project description,
information responsive to each of the
requested evaluation criteria must be
provided. Awarding offices use this and
other information in making their
funding recommendations. It is
important, therefore, that this
information be included in the
application in a manner that is clear and
complete.
General Instructions
ACF is particularly interested in
specific project descriptions that focus
on outcomes and convey strategies for
achieving intended performance. Project
descriptions are evaluated on the basis
of substance and measurable outcomes,
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24063
not length. Extensive exhibits are not
required. Cross-referencing should be
used rather than repetition. Supporting
information concerning activities that
will not be directly funded by the grant
or information that does not directly
pertain to an integral part of the grant
funded activity should be placed in an
appendix.
Pages should be numbered and a table
of contents should be included for easy
reference.
Introduction
Applicants required to submit a full
project description shall prepare the
project description statement in
accordance with the following
instructions while being aware of the
specified evaluation criteria. The text
options give a broad overview of what
your project description should include
while the evaluation criteria identifies
the measures that will be used to
evaluate applications.
Project Summary/Abstract
Provide a summary of the project
description (a page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
Objectives and Need for Assistance
Clearly identify the physical,
economic, social, financial,
institutional, and/or other problem(s)
requiring a solution. The need for
assistance must be demonstrated and
the principal and subordinate objectives
of the project must be clearly stated;
supporting documentation, such as
letters of support and testimonials from
concerned interests other than the
applicant, may be included. Any
relevant data based on planning studies
should be included or referred to in the
endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate
demographic data and participant/
beneficiary information, as needed. In
developing the project description, the
applicant may volunteer or be requested
to provide information on the total
range of projects currently being
conducted and supported (or to be
initiated), some of which may be
outside the scope of the program
announcement.
Results or Benefits Expected
Identify the results and benefits to be
derived.
For example, explain how your
proposed project will achieve the
specific goals and objectives you have
set. Estimate the number of consortium
members you expect to identify. You
may also specify particular individuals
who have agreed to become affiliated
with the Center as examples of your
knowledge and experience in the areas
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
24064
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
of early childhood development and
American Indian Alaska Native
research. If there are particular areas of
research where you have a limited
amount of experience, you may propose
individuals either at your institution or
another institution that would be
willing to be affiliated with the Center.
If you choose this option, please make
sure that a letter of commitment is
included with your application. Explain
how the expected results will benefit
the population to be served.
Specifically, in meeting its needs for the
advancement of American Indian
Alaska Native research that will benefit
the larger American Indian Alaska
Native Head Start and early childhood
community and for early learning
services and activities: how will the
research community benefit from this
project? What benefits will families
derive from these services? How will the
services help them? What lessons will
be learned which might help other
agencies and organizations that are
addressing the needs of a similar client
population?
Approach
Outline a plan of action that describes
the scope and detail of how the
proposed work will be accomplished.
Account for all functions or activities
identified in the application. Cite factors
that might accelerate or decelerate the
work and state your reason for taking
the proposed approach rather than
others. Describe any unusual features of
the project such as design or
technological innovations, reductions in
cost or time, or extraordinary social and
community involvement.
Provide quantitative monthly or
quarterly projections of the
accomplishments to be achieved for
each function or activity in such terms
as the number of people to be served
and the number of activities
accomplished.
Evaluation
Provide a narrative addressing how
the conduct of the project and the
results of the project will be evaluated.
In addressing the evaluation of results,
state how you will determine the extent
to which the project has achieved its
stated objectives and the extent to
which the accomplishment of objectives
can be attributed to the project. Discuss
the criteria to be used to evaluate
results, and explain the methodology
that will be used to determine if the
needs identified and discussed are being
met and if the project results and
benefits are being achieved. With
respect to the conduct of the project,
define the procedures to be employed to
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
determine whether the project is being
conducted in a manner consistent with
the work plan presented and discuss the
impact of the project’s various activities
on the project’s effectiveness.
Additional Information
Following are requests for additional
information that need to be included in
the application:
Staff and Position Data
Provide a biographical sketch and job
description for each key person
appointed. Job descriptions for each
vacant key position should be included
as well. As new key staff is appointed,
biographical sketches will also be
required.
Organizational Profiles
Provide information on the applicant
organization(s) and cooperating
partners, such as organizational charts,
financial statements, audit reports or
statements from CPAs/Licensed Public
Accountants, Employer Identification
Numbers, names of bond carriers,
contact persons and telephone numbers,
child care licenses and other
documentation of professional
accreditation, information on
compliance with Federal/State/local
government standards, documentation
of experience in the program area, and
other pertinent information. If the
applicant is a non-profit organization,
submit proof of non-profit status in its
application.
The non-profit agency can accomplish
this by providing: (a) a reference to the
applicant organization’s listing in the
Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) most
recent list of tax-exempt organizations
described in the IRS Code; (b) a copy of
a currently valid IRS tax exemption
certificate, (c) a statement from a State
taxing body, State attorney general, or
other appropriate State official
certifying that the applicant
organization has a non-profit status and
that none of the net earnings accrue to
any private shareholders or individuals;
(d) a certified copy of the organization’s
certificate of incorporation or similar
document that clearly establishes nonprofit status, (e) any of the items
immediately above for a State or
national parent organization and a
statement signed by the parent
organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit
affiliate.
Letters of Support
Provide statements from community,
public and commercial leaders that
support the project proposed for
funding. All submissions should be
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
included in the application OR by
application deadline.
Budget and Budget Justification
Provide a budget with line item detail
and detailed calculations for each
budget object class identified on the
Budget Information form. Detailed
calculations must include estimation
methods, quantities, unit costs, and
other similar quantitative detail
sufficient for the calculation to be
duplicated. Also include a breakout by
the funding sources identified in Block
15 of the SF–424.
Provide a narrative budget
justification that describes how the
categorical costs are derived. Discuss
the necessity, reasonableness, and
allocability of the proposed costs.
General
Use the following guidelines for
preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and nonFederal resources shall be detailed and
justified in the budget and narrative
justification. ‘‘Federal resources’’ refers
only to the ACF grant for which you are
applying. ‘‘Non Federal resources’’ are
all other Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget
amounts and computations be presented
in a columnar format: first column,
object class categories; second column,
Federal budget; next column(s), nonFederal budget(s), and last column, total
budget. The budget justification should
be a narrative.
Personnel
Description: Costs of employee
salaries and wages.
Justification: Identify the project
director or principal investigator, if
known. For each staff person, provide
the title, time commitment to the project
(in months), time commitment to the
project (as a percentage or full-time
equivalent), annual salary, grant salary,
wage rates, etc. Do not include the costs
of consultants or personnel costs of
delegate agencies or of specific
project(s) or businesses to be financed
by the applicant.
Fringe Benefits
Description: Costs of employee fringe
benefits unless treated as part of an
approved indirect cost rate.
Justification: Provide a breakdown of
the amounts and percentages that
comprise fringe benefit costs such as
health insurance, FICA, retirement
insurance, taxes, etc.
Travel
Description: Costs of project-related
travel by employees of the applicant
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
organization (does not include costs of
consultant travel).
Justification: For each trip, show the
total number of traveler(s), travel
destination, duration of trip, per diem,
mileage allowances, if privately owned
vehicles will be used, and other
transportation costs and subsistence
allowances. Travel costs for key staff to
attend ACF-sponsored workshops
should be detailed in the budget.
Equipment
Description: ‘‘Equipment’’ means an
article of nonexpendable, tangible
personal property having a useful life of
more than one year and an acquisition
cost which equals or exceeds the lesser
of (a) the capitalization level established
by the organization for the financial
statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note:
Acquisition cost means the net invoice
unit price of an item of equipment,
including the cost of any modifications,
attachments, accessories, or auxiliary
apparatus necessary to make it usable
for the purpose for which it is acquired.
Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty,
protective in-transit insurance, freight,
and installation shall be included in or
excluded from acquisition cost in
accordance with the organization’s
regular written accounting practices.)
Justification: For each type of
equipment requested, provide a
description of the equipment, the cost
per unit, the number of units, the total
cost, and a plan for use on the project,
as well as use or disposal of the
equipment after the project ends. An
applicant organization that uses its own
definition for equipment should provide
a copy of its policy or section of its
policy which includes the equipment
definition.
Supplies
Description: Costs of all tangible
personal property other than that
included under the Equipment category.
Justification: Specify general
categories of supplies and their costs.
Show computations and provide other
information which supports the amount
requested.
Contractual
Description: Costs of all contracts for
services and goods except for those that
belong under other categories such as
equipment, supplies, construction, etc.
Include third party evaluation contracts
(if applicable) and contracts with
secondary recipient organizations,
including delegate agencies and specific
project(s) or businesses to be financed
by the applicant.
Justification: Demonstrate that all
procurement transactions will be
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
conducted in a manner to provide, to
the maximum extent practical, open and
free competition. Recipients and
subrecipients, other than States that are
required to use Part 92 procedures, must
justify any anticipated procurement
action that is expected to be awarded
without competition and exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold fixed at
41 U.S.C. 403(11) (currently set at
$100,000).
Recipients might be required to make
available to ACF pre-award review and
procurement documents, such as
request for proposals or invitations for
bids, independent cost estimates, etc.
24065
authorized representative of the
applicant organization must submit a
signed acknowledgement that the
applicant is accepting a lower rate than
allowed.
Other
Enter the total of all other costs. Such
costs, where applicable and appropriate,
may include but are not limited to
insurance, food, medical and dental
costs (noncontractual), professional
services costs, space and equipment
rentals, printing and publication,
computer use, training costs, such as
tuition and stipends, staff development
costs, and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a
narrative description and a justification
for each cost under this category.
Non-Federal Resources
Description: Amounts of non-Federal
resources that will be used to support
the project as identified in Block 15 of
the SF–424.
Justification: The firm commitment of
these resources must be documented
and submitted with the application so
the applicant is given credit in the
review process. A detailed budget must
be prepared for each funding source.
Evaluation Criteria: The following
evaluation criteria appear in weighted
descending order. The corresponding
score values indicate the relative
importance that ACF places on each
evaluation criterion; however,
applicants need not develop their
applications precisely according to the
order presented. Application
components may be organized such that
a reviewer will be able to follow a
seamless and logical flow of information
(i.e., from a broad overview of the
project to more detailed information
about how it will be conducted).
In considering how applicants will
carry out the responsibilities addressed
under this announcement, competing
applications for financial assistance will
be reviewed and evaluated against the
following criteria:
Indirect Charges
Description: Total amount of indirect
costs. This category should be used only
when the applicant currently has an
indirect cost rate approved by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) or another cognizant
Federal agency.
Justification: An applicant that will
charge indirect costs to the grant must
enclose a copy of the current rate
agreement. If the applicant organization
is in the process of initially developing
or renegotiating a rate, upon notification
that an award will be made, it should
immediately develop a tentative indirect
cost rate proposal based on its most
recently completed fiscal year, in
accordance with the cognizant agency’s
guidelines for establishing indirect cost
rates, and submit it to the cognizant
agency. Applicants awaiting approval of
their indirect cost proposals may also
request indirect costs. When an indirect
cost rate is requested, those costs
included in the indirect cost pool
should not also be charged as direct
costs to the grant. Also, if the applicant
is requesting a rate which is less than
what is allowed under the program, the
Approach—45 Points
Æ The extent to which the proposal
provides evidence that the Center will
be fully operational within 12 months,
including the establishment of formal
relationships with local researchers who
will make up the consortium.
Æ The extent to which the application
clearly states the activities that the
Center will undertake and how they
meet the goals specified.
Æ The extent to which the proposal
develops a plan on how it will
collaborate on research with consortium
members, what kinds of assistance it
will provide, and any capacity building
activities. It is important to remember
that any research plans should be jointly
developed by the local research
institutions and the Head Start or Early
Head Start programs, as well as other
relevant tribal stakeholders they plan to
partner with, and approved by the
Center in conjunction with OPRE. The
application demonstrates a detailed
process on how the applicant intends on
awarding local research projects and
clearly communicate the stipulation that
one of the requirements of any local
Principal Investigator is a letter of
Note: Whenever the applicant intends to
delegate part of the project to another agency,
the applicant must provide a detailed budget
and budget narrative for each delegate
agency, by agency title, along with the
required supporting information referred to
in these instructions.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
24066
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
agreement from the Head Start or Early
Head Start program the local P.I. intends
on working with, certifying that they
have entered into a partnership with the
applicant and the application has been
reviewed and approved by tribal
authorities.
Æ The extent to which the proposal
describes in detail how it will promote
professional and educational
opportunities for undergraduates, predoctoral and medical students,
residents, post-doctoral trainees and
senior scholars who are interested in
AI–AN research.
Æ The extent to which the proposal is
responsive to the requirements outlined
in the ‘‘Additional Information on
Eligibility’’ section.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
clearly lays out the planning process it
will develop with consortium members.
This includes reviewing and approving
any research designs to make sure they
are appropriate and sufficient for
addressing the questions of each of the
studies in conjunction with OPRE.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
specifies procedures for the selecting of
research projects and activities that
conform to the highest scientific
standards, and the extent to which those
selection procedures are objective and
inclusive.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
develops and operationalizes
management processes that clearly
stipulate that the proposed Center will:
Æ Review and approve the extent to
which any planned research project
specifies an appropriate design,
including approaches to sampling, the
measures to be used and their
psychometric properties, and the
analyses to be conducted;
Æ Review and approve any planned
procedures and measures to make sure
they will be appropriate and sufficient
for the questions of studies and the
cultural contexts of the population to be
studied;
Æ Review and approve any planned
measures and analyses to make sure that
they will reflect knowledge and use of
state-of-the-art measures and analytic
techniques and/or advance the field;
Æ Review and approve any analytic
techniques and make sure they are
appropriate for the questions under
consideration;
Æ Review and approve any proposed
sample sizes to make sure they will be
sufficient;
Æ Review and approve any planned
approaches to make sure they will
include techniques for successful
documentation and dissemination; and
Æ Review and approve any budgets
and budget justifications to make sure
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
they are appropriate for carrying out the
proposed projects.
Æ The extent to which the activities
listed above are incorporated into a
detailed technical assistance and
capacity building strategy to ensure that
each research project will receive the
necessary guidance and oversight
needed to successfully complete its
project.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
provides a detailed information and
dissemination plan that includes the
Head Start network and the field as a
whole. Examples of potential products
that may result from the Center and its
research partners should also be
included.
Staff and Position Data—35 Points
Æ The extent to which the applicant
is a university, four-year college, and
not-for-profit institution applying on
behalf of the Principal Investigator and
other key Center staff possess both the
multidisciplinary expertise to conduct
early childhood research, and the
management experience necessary to
create and operate the Center. The
applicant must also discuss how Center
staff will build the consortium and then
assist consortium members with
implementing interventions and any
technical experience that will benefit
local researchers as they conduct
research, as demonstrated in the
application and information contained
in their vitae. It is expected that the
Principal Investigator(s) has earned a
doctorate or equivalent in the relevant
field and has publications in major peerreviewed research journals.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates the capacity to establish
working relationships with researchers
or researchers outside the applicant’s
own institution, and the extent to which
there is evidence of prior successful
partnerships to conduct research with
AI–AN communities.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
can provide a detailed plan on how it
will advance the scholarship of AI–AN
early childhood research by promoting
professional opportunities and
leadership for undergraduates, predoctoral and medical students,
residents, post-doctoral trainees and
senior scholars who are interested in
AI–AN research.
Æ The extent to which the proposed
staff reflect an understanding of and
sensitivity to the issues of working in a
tribal community setting and in
partnership with American Indian
Alaska Native Head Start program staff
and parents.
Æ The extent to which there is enough
time devoted to this project by the
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Principal Investigator and other key staff
in order to ensure a high level of
professional input and attention.
Æ The extent to which the research
plan offers opportunities for American
Indian and Alaska Native personnel to
be engaged or employed in the research
activities.
Æ The extent to which the institution
the applicant is affiliated with can
provide the technological, academic,
research, logistical and human capital
that will either directly or indirectly
benefit the proposed AI–AN Head Start
Research Center.
Results or Benefits Expected—20 Points
Æ The extent to which project goals
and objectives are clearly stated.
Æ The extent to which the proposed
research project is justified as meeting
the needs of American Indian and
Alaska Native children and families and
the research community that represents
them.
Æ The extent to which the applicant’s
proposed Center and its design makes a
significant contribution to the
knowledge base and support the
research on the early development of
American Indian and Alaska Native
children and their families.
Æ The extent to which the literature
review is current and comprehensive
and justifies the knowledge of the
applicant and any understanding of
potential research that may be
conducted.
Æ The extent to which the applicant
understands and can provide
professional support to research
questions that may be addressed or
hypotheses that may be tested by
consortium members.
Æ The extent to which the proposal
contains sufficient details for meeting
the stated objectives.
Æ The extent to which the proposal
contains a dissemination plan that
encompasses both professional and
practitioner-oriented products, and
meets the needs of the Head Start and/
or community partners.
Æ The extent to which the questions
are of importance and relevance for AI–
AN children’s development and welfare.
Æ The extent to which the application
provides for the Principal Investigator to
attend two meetings each year. The first
is an annual grantee meeting that is
typically scheduled during the summer
or fall of each year and is held in
Washington, DC. All local P.I.’s that
make up the consortium are also
expected to attend. The second meeting
each year alternates between the
biennial Head Start National Research
Conference in Washington, DC, June
26th through June 29th, 2006 and the
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
biennial meeting of the Society for
Research in Child Development-SRCD.
2. Review and Selection Process: No
grant award will be made under this
announcement on the basis of an
incomplete application.
Each application will undergo an
eligibility and conformance review by
Federal staff. Applications that pass the
eligibility and conformance review will
be evaluated on a competitive basis
according to the specified evaluation
criteria. The competitive review will be
conducted in the Washington, DC
metropolitan area by panels of Federal
and non-Federal experts knowledgeable
in the areas of early childhood
education and intervention research,
early learning, child care, and other
relevant program areas.
Application review panels will assign
a score to each application and identify
its strengths and weaknesses.
OPRE will conduct an administrative
review of the applications and results of
the competitive review panels and make
recommendations for funding to the
Director of OPRE.
The Director of OPRE, in consultation
with the Commissioner of the
Administration on Children, Youth, and
Families (ACYF), will make the final
selection of the applications to be
funded. Applications may be funded in
whole or in part depending on: (1) The
ranked order of applicants resulting
from the competitive review; (2) staff
review and consultations; (3) the funds
available; and (4) other relevant
considerations. The Director may also
elect not to fund any applicants with
known management, fiscal, reporting,
program, or other problems, which
make it unlikely that they would be able
to provide effective services.
Approved But Unfunded Applications
Applications that are approved but
unfunded may be held over for funding
in the next funding cycle, pending the
availability of funds, for a period not to
exceed one year.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: The successful
applicants will be notified through the
issuance of a Financial Assistance
Award document which sets forth the
amount of funds granted, the terms and
conditions of the grant, the effective
date of the grant, the budget period for
which initial support will be given, the
non-Federal share to be provided (if
applicable), and the total project period
for which support is contemplated. The
Financial Assistance Award will be
signed by the Grants Officer and
transmitted via postal mail.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Organizations whose applications will
not be funded will be notified in
writing.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: Grantees are subject to
the requirements in 45 CFR part 74
(non-governmental) or 45 CFR part 92
(governmental).
ACF expects to work closely with the
organization that receives funding to
ensure monies are used appropriately
and in the most effective manner
possible and that the services and
activities included in the approved
application address the establishment of
a consortium of local research partners
and that the needs of the research
partners and the American Indian
Alaska Native communities be clearly
stated in an efficient, effective, and
timely manner. Therefore, the
organization selected to receive the
award will be responsible for
implementing activities specified in a
work plan that will be jointly developed
by the Center and staff from ACF, in
consultation with the Head Start
Bureau.
The successful applicant will be
responsible for submitting for Federal
review and approval regular semiannual financial status and progress
reports that describe project activities,
and will work cooperatively and
collaboratively with ACF officials, other
Federal agency officials conducting
related activities, and other entities or
organizations contracted by ACF to
assist in carrying out the purposes of the
Head Start program; and ensuring that
key staff attend and participate in ACF
sponsored workshops and meetings. All
applicants are responsible for
conforming to the United States
Executive Branch Code of Federal
Regulations (https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
cfr/). The following
regulations have been identified as
having particular relevance for ACF
grants: 45 CFR parts 74 and 92.
Direct Federal grants, subaward
funds, or contracts under this ACF
program shall not be used to support
inherently religious activities such as
religious instruction, worship, or
proselytization. Therefore, organizations
must take steps to separate, in time or
location, their inherently religious
activities from the services funded
under this program. Regulations
pertaining to the prohibition of Federal
funds for inherently religious activities
can be found on the HHS Web site at
https://www.os.dhhs.gov/fbci/
waisgate21.pdf.
3. Reporting Requirements: Grantees
will be required to submit program
progress and financial reports (SF–269
found at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24067
programs/ofs/forms.htm) throughout the
project period. Program progress and
financial reports are due 30 days after
the reporting period. Final
programmatic and financial reports are
due 90 days after the close of the project
period.
Program Progress Reports: SemiAnnually.
Financial Reports: Semi-Annually.
Original reports and one copy should
be mailed to: Administration for
Children and Families, Office of Grants
Management, Division of Discretionary
Grants, 370 L’Enfant Promenade, SW.,
Washington, DC 20447.
VII. Agency Contacts
Program Office Contact: Head Start
Research Support Technical Assistance
Team, OPRE Grant Review Team, Xtria,
LLC, 8045 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400,
Vienna, VA 22182, phone: 877–663–
0250; e-mail: opre@xtria.com.
Grants Management Office Contact:
Attention: Tim Chappelle, Division of
Discretionary Grants, Office of Grants
Management, Administration for
Children and Families, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade, SW., Washington, DC
20447, phone: 202–401–4855; e-mail:
tichappelle@acf.hhs.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: Beginning with FY 2006, the
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF) will no longer publish
grant announcements in the Federal
Register. Beginning October 1, 2005
applicants will be able to find a
synopsis of all ACF grant opportunities
and apply electronically for
opportunities via: https://
www.Grants.gov. Applicants will also be
able to find the complete text of all ACF
grant announcements on the ACF Web
site located at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/
grants/.
Applicants under this announcement
are advised that subsequent sale and
distribution of products developed
under this grant will be subject to the
Code of Federal Regulations, title 45,
part 74 or part 92. The use of secondary
data analysis in order to refine and
validate newly-developed measures in
relation to already standardized
measures is strongly advised.
Definitions: Budget Period—for the
purposes of this announcement, budget
period means the 12-month period of
time for which ACF funds are made
available to a particular grantee (e.g.,
beginning on September 16, 2005, and
ending on September 15, 2006).
Project Period—for the purposes of
this announcement, project period
means the 36-month period starting by
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
24068
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 87 / Friday, May 6, 2005 / Notices
September 2005, and ending by
September, 2008.
The Head Start Act mandates that all
studies, reports, proposals, and data
produced or developed with Federal
funds awarded under the Act shall
become the property of the United
States (see S. 649(f) of the Head Start
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9845). HHS authorizes
grantee institutions, their researchers
and other persons to make use of all
studies, reports, proposals, and data
produced or developed under grants
funded under Section 649 of the Head
Start Act in activities in furtherance of
the purposes of the Head Start program.
Grantees must provide copies of all
materials produced with Head Start
grant funds to ACF as soon as they
become available.
Please reference Section IV.3 for
details about acknowledgement of
received applications.
Dated: May 2, 2005.
Naomi Goldstein,
Director, Office of Planning, Research, and
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 05–9073 Filed 5–5–05; 8:45 am]
Head Start Graduate Student Research
Grants, and (3) Head Start Graduate
Student Research Partnership
Development Grants. For more
information, please see these other Head
Start Research announcements listed in
the Federal Register or listed on
https://www.Grants.Gov, or send an email inquiry to opre@xtria.com.
Priority Area: Head Start-University
Partnership Research Grants:
Curriculum Development and
Enhancement for Head Start and Early
Head Start Programs.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Purpose
The purpose of this announcement is
to report the availability of funds to
support research grants for the
development of curricular approaches,
adaptations or enhancements to practice
for Head Start and Early Head Start
programs. Grants will require
researcher/program partnerships with
Head Start and/or Early Head Start
programs.
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
B. Statutory Authority
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Section 649 of the Head Start Act, as
amended by the COATES Human
Services Reauthorization Act of 1998
(Pub. L. 105–285) and 42 U.S.C. 9844.
C. Background
Administration for Children and
Families
Office of Planning, Research and
Evaluation (OPRE); Head StartUniversity Partnership Research
Grants: Curriculum Development and
Enhancement for Head Start and Early
Head Start Programs
Announcement Type: Grant—Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2005–ACF–OPRE–YF–0070.
CFDA Number: 93.600.
Due Date for Letter of Intent or
Preapplications: 6/03/2005.
Due Date for Applications: 7/01/2005.
Executive Summary: Funds are
provided for Head Start-University
Partnership Research Grants:
Curriculum Development and
Enhancement for Head Start and Early
Head Start Programs, for research
activities to develop and test curricular
approaches, adaptations or targeted
curriculum enhancements for use by
Head Start and Early Head Start
programs.
This grant program is part of a larger
Head Start research effort. Three other
grant funding mechanisms are being
offered concurrently with the one
described in this announcement. They
include: (1) American Indian-Alaska
Native Head Start Research Center, (2)
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:51 May 05, 2005
Jkt 205001
Use of Curricula in Head Start and Early
Head Start Programs
The Head Start program has long
served as a national laboratory for the
development of innovative strategies in
early childhood education. Head Start
also emphasizes a process of continuous
program improvement and has more
recently been a leader in developing
outcome-oriented accountability
measures. Programs must comply with
the Head Start performance standards,
which provide a standard definition of
quality services and serve as a training
guide for staff and parents on the key
elements of quality. Among other
things, the performance standards
require that all Head Start programs
implement a curriculum; however, use
of a particular curriculum is not
prescribed. The standards specify that
programs must, in collaboration with
parents, implement a curriculum that:
(i) Supports each child’s individual
pattern of development and learning;
(ii) Provides for the development of
cognitive skills by encouraging each
child to organize his or her experiences,
to understand concepts and to develop
age appropriate literacy, numeracy,
reasoning, problem solving and
decision-making skills which form a
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
foundation for school readiness and
later school success;
(iii) Integrates all educational aspects
of the health, nutrition and mental
health services into program activities;
(iv) Ensures that the program
environment helps children develop
emotional security and facility in social
relationships;
(v) Enhances each child’s
understanding of self as an individual
and as a member of a group;
(vi) Provides each child with
opportunities for success to help
develop feelings of competence, selfesteem and positive attitudes toward
learning; and
(vii) Provides individual and small
group experiences both indoors and
outdoors.
Additionally, the standards state that
staff must use a variety of strategies to
promote and support children’s learning
and developmental progress based on
observations and on-going assessment of
each child (see 45 CFR 1304.20(b),
1304.20(d) and 1304.20(e)).
The annual Head Start Program
Information Report (PIR) requests
information from all Head Start and
Early Head Start programs about the
curricula they use. Data from the most
recent PIR reveal that center-based
programs are most likely to use one of
two curricula (Creative Curriculum and
High/Scope). Locally designed curricula
are the third most common category,
and the High Reach curriculum is the
fourth. A range of other curricula are
utilized by the remaining programs.
The Head Start Child Outcomes
Framework and National Studies
Released in 2000, the Head Start
Child Outcomes Framework is intended
to guide Head Start programs in their
curriculum planning and on-going
assessment of progress and
accomplishments of children. The
Framework is composed of 8 general
Domains, 27 Domain Elements and
examples of specific indicators related
to each Domain/Domain Element. For
more information, see https://
www.headstartinfo.org/publications/
hsbulletin76/hsb76_09.htm.
The Head Start Child Outcomes
Framework placed these outcomes in
the context of a comprehensive focus on
multiple domains of development.
Programs are required to implement ongoing developmental assessments across
these domains, using measures aligned
with their chosen curricula.
A number of on-going national studies
are contributing to our understanding of
outcomes for children served in Head
Start and Early Head Start programs:
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 87 (Friday, May 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24057-24068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
American Indian--Alaska Native Head Start Research Center
Program Office: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE).
Funding Opportunity Title: American Indian-Alaska Native Head
Start-Research Center.
Announcement Type: Cooperative Agreement--Initial.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS-2005-ACF-OPRE-YF-0067.
CFDA Number: 93.600.
Due Date for Letter of Intent or Preapplications: 6/3/2005.
Due Date for Applications: 7/1/2005.
Executive Summary: Funds are provided for the creation of an
American Indian Alaska Native (AI-AN) Head Start Research Center that
will provide leadership and collaborate with researchers with diverse
areas of expertise in order to facilitate early childhood research
within the Head Start AI-AN context, engage in capacity building, and
establish model research partnerships between local researchers, Head
Start American Indian Alaska Native program staff and members of tribal
communities.
This cooperative agreement is part of a larger Head Start research
effort. Three other grant funding mechanisms are being offered
concurrently with the one described in this announcement. They include:
(1) American Indian-Alaska Native Head Start Research Center, (2) Head
Start Graduate Student Research Grants, and (3) Head Start Graduate
Student Research Partnership Development Grants. For more information,
please see these other Head Start Research announcements listed in the
Federal Register or listed on https://www.Grants.gov.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Purpose
The purpose of this opportunity is to fund an American Indian
Alaska Native Head Start Research Center that will provide leadership
and offer support in the development and facilitation of local
research, and strengthen the ability of local researchers to conduct
model research projects (based in universities and other non-profit
research institutions) in collaboration with Head Start American
Indian, Alaska Native program staff and members of tribal communities.
The Center is expected to engage in a variety of activities that are
designed to promote excellence in early childhood research, make a
significant contribution to the knowledge base, improve research
capacity, and provide leadership and support for research on the early
development of American Indian Alaska Native children. The successful
applicant should be aware of and be able to collaborate with local
researchers who are conversant with tribal communities; be familiar
with the available strengths and needs of tribal communities; be
knowledgeable of the particular histories of tribal Head Start
programs; and be able to build the trust and support of local tribes so
they may become valuable partners in developing research goals and
questions.
The Center will also be responsible for assuring that each
successful partnership will be able to provide evidence that the
research projects are developing information to improve the early
learning environments for American Indian Alaska Native Head Start
children. Therefore, such affiliations necessitate that researchers
become familiar with the goals and approaches of existing AI-AN Head
Start programs.
It is expected that the lessons learned from model partnerships
will then be shared with the larger research community, both through
the Head Start network and by other means. Examples of approaches and
lessons learned from these partnerships that could be shared include,
but are not limited to: methodological approaches for sampling;
assessment and analysis at the local program level; plans for reporting
data to teachers, parents, and management staff; integrated curricular
and assessment approaches; and professional development approaches
including coursework and training materials.
B. Statutory Authority
Section 649 of the Head Start Act, as amended by the Coats Human
Services Reauthorization Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-285) codified at 42
U.S.C. 9844.
C. Background
The American Indian Alaska Native Program Branch funds Head Start
and Early Head Start programs operated by tribes, consortia, and/or
corporations. The majority of grantees serve and reside on tribal
reservations. Generally, grants are awarded to tribal governments, with
tribal presidents, governors, executive directors or administrators as
authorizing officials.
American Indian and Alaska Native (AI-AN) Head Start programs
reflect the diversity of languages and traditions that exist in AI-AN
cultures. Substantial numbers of children served by the AI-AN Branch
speak an American Indian language or language other than English or
Spanish as their dominant language. The programs vary greatly in size,
with the smallest grantee serving about 15 children and the largest,
more than 4,000 children and families. The programs also are
geographically diverse, and are located in isolated rural settings as
well as in urban areas. AI-AN grantees provide comprehensive services
to children and families through center and home-based options, as well
as combinations and locally designed configurations.
Historically, the diversity of many different tribes participating
in Head Start has posed methodological challenges to their inclusion in
nationally representative samples for evaluation research. For
instance, current national research and evaluation activities of Head
Start, such as the Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES) and the
Head Start Impact Study, exclude tribal programs from the population
eligible for inclusion in the samples.
While there are reporting challenges that are unique to AI-AN
populations, Tribal Head Start programs have the same performance
standards and requirements for assessing program outcomes as other Head
Start programs. However, there is little prior research evidence
available to provide guidance to programs about effective
[[Page 24058]]
instructional, service delivery, or assessment approaches in tribal
settings.
American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start programs need to be
included in Head Start Bureau efforts to enhance the quality of Head
Start programming, and to improve accountability by strengthening
screening and assessment of child outcomes and program monitoring.
There is a need, however, to provide leadership and guidance in order
to increase the evidence base and provide direction for program
enhancements, and such activities must be conducted in a manner that
takes into account the unique cultural values of tribes implementing
Head Start programs.
For historical and ethical reasons tribal communities must have a
significant voice in how research is designed and conducted in those
settings. To support the development and implementation of research
within and by tribal communities, ACF undertook in FY2002 an effort to
document the existing knowledge base concerning early childhood
programming and assessment in tribal settings, and to collect
information on the research needs and priorities of tribal Head Start
programs. Little was known about what research was currently being
conducted by tribal Head Start programs, what the experiences of tribal
programs in research partnerships with colleges and universities had
been, and how ACF might support these partnerships. The project
resulted in a review and synthesis of available research literature,
both published and unpublished, that pertained to young children and
families in American Indian and Alaska Native populations. That report
is available online at: https://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/core/
ongoing_research/hs/hs_aian_report.html.
A second part of this effort was to conduct a series of visits to
tribes to assess their own views about the following questions: (1)
What kind of research is needed and desired in tribal Head Start
settings; (2) what outcomes are important for American Indian and
Alaska Native Head Start; (3) what programmatic and service delivery
issues need to be studied; and (4) what are the issues in conducting
research among American Indian and Alaska Native populations? Visits
were arranged with 19 tribes to conduct ``listening sessions'' with
tribal leadership, Head Start personnel, Head Start family members, and
other community stakeholders. Other sessions were held in conjunction
with national meetings of American Indian Alaska Native Head Start
grantees and technical assistance staff.
These efforts documented the scarcity of existing research that
directly informs early childhood programming for American Indian and
Alaska Native children and families. Few studies have taken into
account the unique cultural and linguistic characteristics of the AI-AN
population, and existing studies tend to be small, methodologically
weak, and of limited generalizability to other surroundings. There is a
need to develop the capacity for early childhood research in tribal
settings both to improve the ability of tribal members themselves to
initiate research projects and to increase the number of qualified
individuals who have the ability to effectively partner with tribes to
implement research.
At the same time, there is widespread recognition within tribal
communities of the need for culturally relevant research, as well as
substantial support among tribal members for research that will advance
the knowledge base and improve the lives of the children and families
who are served by Head Start in their communities. Indeed, tribal
communities have affirmed that they must have a significant voice in
how the research is designed and conducted among their members.
Cultural issues must be addressed in the development of methodologies,
study procedures, and data collection instruments for use in conducting
research among tribal Head Start programs. Differences among American
Indian-Alaskan Native groups must be acknowledged and respected in
developing the methodology and conducting the research. In addition to
Head Start personnel, tribal leaders and community elders often must be
part of the process in designing and conducting research in tribal
settings.
Building on the needs identified both by participants in the
listening sessions, and other consultants, this announcement is
intended to ensure that future research is responsive to the changing
needs of American Indian-Alaska Native children and families, and that
researchers who are focusing on early childhood research within tribal
communities are provided with the necessary leadership and support for
capacity building that is currently needed. Therefore, Head Start's
commitment to a partnership between researchers and a national AI-AN
Head Start Research Center is essential. The unique relationship forged
between the Center, the researcher and the tribal community within the
Head Start and early childhood research context will serve as a model
for the establishment of other partnerships within the community (e.g.,
researcher-Head Start staff, researcher-family, etc.). This foundation
will help bolster the skills necessary to build on early childhood
research paradigms by fostering successful collaborations between the
AI-AN population and the scientific community.
Thus, the goal of the Head Start American Indian Alaska Native
Research Center is to pull together researchers with diverse areas of
expertise that will focus on early childhood research within the Head
Start context, as well as in tribal communities as a whole. It is
anticipated that the Center will make a significant contribution to the
knowledge base and support the research on the early development of
American Indian-Alaska Native children and families. The types of
topics that have previously been identified as particularly relevant to
research within AI-AN settings are listed below; the Center may wish to
propose other relevant topics as well.
Identifying and addressing the unique characteristics and
needs of American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start children and
families that may affect learning;
Examining the role of Head Start in promoting and
maintaining native languages and culture by documenting and addressing
cultural diversity within tribal Head Start settings;
Comparing outcomes for bilingual children vs. English-only
speakers;
Investigating long-term outcomes for AI-AN Head Start
children, including studies of factors that promote or inhibit the
successful transition to school and studies that compare outcomes for
AI-AN Head Start children with those for other Head Start children;
Comparing tribal Head Start children to non-tribal
children;
Studying the effectiveness of instructional practices
tailored to the unique characteristics of tribal children that promote
school readiness;
Documenting and assessing the availability of resources to
meet unique tribal needs;
Evaluating programs that are aimed at health and
development, including health delivery models as well as preventive
programs for adverse health and mental health outcomes;
Exploring staff development issues, including wage and
benefit comparability between AI-AN and non-tribal early childhood
educators, causes of staff turnover, ways to retain staff,
identification of staff members' academic and non-academic skills that
best promote child development within
[[Page 24059]]
a cultural context, and providing staff development opportunities in
geographically isolated communities;
Developing and utilizing culturally appropriate screening,
assessment, and outcome measures;
Building and promoting methods for enhancing communication
and cooperation among Head Start personnel, parents, tribal
governments, and school district personnel;
Identifying special needs among AI-AN Head Start children,
and recommending and testing, or developing and evaluating programs for
addressing them;
Examining the effectiveness of methods for enhancing
parent involvement, including promotion of knowledge about child
development among parents, promotion of adult literacy, and promotion
of father involvement;
Investigating the impact of adverse conditions on child
development, including geographic isolation and poverty, adverse family
circumstances such as domestic violence or substance abuse, and
historical experiences of racism and discrimination of AI-AN culture;
and
Promoting professional and educational opportunities for
undergraduates, pre-doctoral and medical students, residents, post-
doctoral trainees and senior scholars who are interested in AI-AN
research.
The Center will advance the research field and Head Start by
facilitating capacity building with local researchers, scholars,
American Indian Alaska Native Head Start staff, tribal authorities,
tribal communities and families. The objectives of the project are to:
(1) Create a national research center that will contribute to the
knowledge base on early development of American Indian Alaska Native
children and families within the Head Start program; (2) support local
research projects that focus on the development of young children and
families in American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start and Early Head
Start programs; and (3) build capacity and promote partnerships between
the local research community and Head Start tribal communities.
The Center will achieve this by facilitating and supporting the
development of partnership opportunities between researchers, and AI-AN
Head Start communities in order to begin to build a portfolio of
research projects related to early childhood development in AI-AN
settings. It is expected that a working consortium of researchers will
be established that will identify and further develop particular
research approaches targeted toward better describing the unique
characteristics and developmental needs of American Indian Alaska
Native children and their families, evaluating or enhancing program
practices, and developing approaches to outcomes assessment based on
the needs of the population served. The Center and consortium will
develop research activities and topics that are decided through the
cooperative agreement between OPRE, the Center and in consultation with
the AI-AN Head Start staff and other tribal stakeholders that have
agreed to participate in research projects, and that clearly reflect
the interests of the American Indian Alaska Native Head Start programs
and communities. Note that all studies, reports, proposals, and data
produced or developed with federal funds under Head Start American
Indian-Native Alaskan Research Center Program ``shall become the
property of the United States.'' pursuant to Section 649(f) of the Head
Start Act, 42 U.S.C. 9844.
The types of activities that may be undertaken to support the
development of research partnerships include, but are not limited to:
providing financial support through competitions or other selection
mechanisms to research projects that will be undertaken through
partnerships between research institutions and AI-AN Head Start
communities; supporting or augmenting research projects already in
development or underway in AI-AN settings; piloting or implementing
specific research projects with AI-AN Head Start communities; and
providing training or career development opportunities to build
research capacity for AI-AN Head Start communities. Significant
involvement in the planning and implementation of all activities by the
AI-AN Head Start communities themselves will be an important feature.
Although applicants are expected to propose specific activities for
accomplishing the goals of the project, final work plans will be
developed in conjunction with ACF and Head Start staff.
Priority Area
1. Description.
II. Award Information
Funding Instrument Type: Cooperative Agreement.
Substantial Involvement with Cooperative Agreement: ACF expects to
work closely with the organization that receives funding to ensure
monies are used appropriately and in the most effective manner possible
and that the services and activities included in the approved
application address the establishment of a consortium of local research
partners and that the needs of the research partners and the American
Indian Alaska Native communities be clearly stated in an efficient,
effective, and timely manner. Therefore, the organization selected to
receive the award will be responsible for implementing activities
specified in a work plan that will be jointly developed by the Center
and staff from OPRE, in consultation with the Head Start Bureau.
Anticipated Total Priority Area Funding: $800,000.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 1.
Ceiling on Amount of Individual Awards: $800,000 per budget period.
Floor on Amount of Individual Awards: None.
Average Projected Award Amount: $800,000 per budget period.
Length of Project Periods: 36 month project with three 12 month
budget periods.
The Federal share of project costs shall not exceed $800,000 for
the first 12-month budget period inclusive of indirect costs and shall
not exceed $1,000,000 per year for the second through third 12-month
budget periods. An application that exceeds the upper value of the
dollar range specified will be considered ``non-responsive'' and be
returned to the applicant without further review. The project period
will be up to three years. The initial award will be for the first one-
year budget period. Requests for a second and/or third year of funding
within the project period should be identified in the current
application (on SF-424A), but such requests will be considered in
subsequent years on a noncompetitive basis, subject to the applicant's
eligibility status, the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of
the grantee, and a determination that continued funding would be in the
best interest of the Government. An application for a continuation
funded under this award beyond the three-year budget and three-year
project period for an additional two years will be entertained in
subsequent years on a noncompetitive basis, subject to availability of
funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee and a determination that
continued funding would be in the best interest of the Government.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
State controlled institutions of higher education
[[Page 24060]]
Non-profits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other
than institutions of higher education
Non-profits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the
IRS, other than institutions of higher education
Private institutions of higher education
Additional Information on Eligibility: Applicants are universities,
four-year colleges, and not-for profit institutions on behalf of
researchers who hold a doctorate degree or equivalent in their
respective fields. The Principal Investigator who will head up the
Center must conduct research as a primary professional responsibility,
and have published or have been accepted for publication in the major
peer-reviewed research journals in the field as a first author or
second author.
An important element of this announcement is the requirement that
the applicant, and any proposed researchers that will eventually make
up the consortium, demonstrate a partnership or partnerships with Head
Start or Early Head Start programs as part of all research.
The application must contain a detailed process on how the
applicant intends on awarding local research projects and clearly
communicate the stipulation that one of the requirements of any local
Principal Investigator is a letter of agreement from the Head Start or
Early Head Start program the local P.I. intends on working with,
certifying that they have entered into a partnership with the applicant
and the application has been reviewed and approved by tribal
authorities.
The Principal Investigator must agree to attend two meetings each
year. The first is an annual grantee meeting that is typically
scheduled during the summer or fall of each year and is held in
Washington, DC. All local P.I.'s that make up the consortium are also
expected to attend. The second meeting each year alternates between the
biennial Head Start National Research Conference in Washington, DC,
June 26th through June 29th, 2006 and the biennial meeting of the
Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD). The budget should
reflect travel funds for such purposes.
Please see section V.1 Evaluation Criteria for further information
on how applications will be scored based on program requirements.
Faith-based and community organizations that meet all other
eligibility criteria are eligible to apply.
2. Cost Sharing/Matching: None.
3. Other: All applicants must have a Dun & Bradstreet number. On
June 27, 2003 the Office of Management and Budget published in the
Federal Register a new Federal policy applicable to all Federal grant
applicants. The policy requires Federal grant applicants to provide a
Dun & Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number when
applying for Federal grants or cooperative agreements on or after
October 1, 2003. The DUNS number will be required whether an applicant
is submitting a paper application or using the government-wide
electronic portal (https://www.Grants.gov). A DUNS number will be
required for every application for a new award or renewal/continuation
of an award, including applications or plans under formula, entitlement
and block grant programs, submitted on or after October 1, 2003.
Please ensure that your organization has a DUNS number. You may
acquire a DUNS number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free
DUNS number request line on 1-866-705-5711 or you may request a number
on-line at https://www.dnb.com.
Non-profit organizations applying for funding are required to
submit proof of their non-profit status.
Proof of non-profit status is any one of the following:
A reference to the applicant organization's listing in the
Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt
organizations described in the IRS Code.
A copy of a currently valid IRS tax exemption certificate.
A statement from a State taxing body, State attorney
general, or other appropriate State official certifying that the
applicant organization has a non-profit status and that none of the net
earnings accrue to any private shareholders or individuals.
A certified copy of the organization's certificate of
incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes non-profit
status.
Any of the items in the subparagraphs immediately above
for a State or national parent organization and a statement signed by
the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local non-
profit affiliate.
When applying electronically we strongly suggest you attach your
proof of non-profit status with your electronic application.
Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with
their applications the survey located under ``Grant Related Documents
and Forms,'' ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Applicants,''
titled, ``Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants,'' at:
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Disqualification Factors: Applications that exceed the ceiling
amount will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered for
funding under this announcement.
Any application that fails to satisfy the deadline requirements
referenced in Section IV.3 will be considered non-responsive and will
not be considered for funding under this announcement.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package: Head Start Research
Support Technical Assistance Team, OPRE Grant Review Team, Xtria, LLC,
8045 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400, Vienna, VA 22182; phone: 877-663-0250;
e-mail: opre@xtria.com.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission:
Letter of Intent: Those who plan to submit an application are
encouraged to submit notice via a letter of intent by fax or e-mail by
June 3, 2005. This information will be used only to determine the
number of expert reviewers needed to review the applications. Include
only the following information in this fax or e-mail: the number and
title of this announcement; the name, address, telephone and fax
number, e-mail address of the principal investigator(s), the fiscal
agent (if known); and the name of the university, non-profit
institution, or other organization. Applicants should not enclose a
description of their proposed project. Send this information to: ``Head
Start Research Support Technical Assistance Team'' at: E-mail:
opre@xtria.com, or fax to: 1-703-356-0472.
Application Requirements: An original and two copies of the
complete application are required. The original copy must include all
required forms, certifications, assurances, and appendices, be signed
by an authorized representative, have original signatures, and be
submitted unbound. The two additional copies of the complete
application must include all required forms, certifications,
assurances, and appendices and must also be submitted unbound.
Applicants have the option of omitting from the application copies (not
the original) of specific salary rates or amounts for individuals
specified in the application budget and Social Security Numbers, if
otherwise required for individuals. The copies may include summary
salary information.
Format and Organization. Applicants are strongly encouraged to
limit their application to 100 pages, double-spaced,
[[Page 24061]]
with standard one-inch margins and 12-point fonts. This page limit
applies to both narrative text and supporting materials but not the
Standard Federal Forms (see list below). Applicants must number the
pages of their application beginning with the Table of Contents.
Applicants are advised to include all required forms and materials
and to organize these materials according to the format, and in the
order, presented below:
a. Cover Letter.
b. Contact information sheet (see details below).
c. Standard Federal Forms.
Standard Application for Federal Assistance (form 424) Budget
Information--Non-construction Programs (424A) Certifications Regarding
Lobbying Disclosures of Lobbying Activities (if necessary);
Certification Regarding Environmental Tobacco Smoke Assurance Regarding
Non-construction Programs (form 424B) Assurance Regarding Protection of
Human Subjects.
d. Table of Contents.
e. Project Narrative Statement (see details below).
f. Appendices.
Proof of Non-profit Status (see Section V.1.F), Letter(s) of
agreement with Head Start program(s) (see details below), Letter(s) of
agreement with Head Start Policy Council(s) (see details below),
Curriculum Vitae for Principal Investigators.
You may submit your application to us in either electronic or paper
format. To submit an application electronically, please use the https://
www.Grants.gov/Apply site. If you use Grants.gov, you will be able to
download a copy of the application package, complete it off-line, and
then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov site. ACF
will not accept grant applications via email or facsimile transmission.
Please note the following if you plan to submit your application
electronically via Grants.gov:
Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly
encouraged.
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation. We strongly recommend that you
do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the
application process through Grants.gov.
We recommend you visit Grants.gov at least 30 days prior
to filing your application to fully understand the process and
requirements. We encourage applicants who submit electronically to
submit well before the closing date and time so that if difficulties
are encountered an applicant can still send in a hard copy overnight.
If you encounter difficulties, please contact the Grants.gov Help Desk
at 1-800-518-4276 to report the problem and obtain assistance with the
system.
To use Grants.gov, you, as the applicant, must have a DUNS
Number and register in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). You
should allow a minimum of five days to complete the CCR registration.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit a grant application in electronic format, nor will we penalize
you if you submit an application in paper format.
You may submit all documents electronically, including all
information typically included on the SF 424 and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
Your application must comply with any page limitation
requirements described in this program announcement.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgement from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The Administration for Children and
Families will retrieve your application from Grants.gov.
We may request that you provide original signatures on
forms at a later date.
You may access the electronic application for this program
on https://www.Grants.gov
You must search for the downloadable application package
by the CFDA number.
Applicants that are submitting their application in paper format
should submit an original and two copies of the complete application.
The original and each of the two copies must include all required
forms, certifications, assurances, and appendices, be signed by an
authorized representative, have original signatures, and be submitted
unbound.
Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged to submit with
their applications the survey located under ``Grant Related Documents
and Forms,'' ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant Applicants,''
titled, ``Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants,'' at:
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Standard Forms and Certifications: The project description should
include all the information requirements described in the specific
evaluation criteria outlined in the program announcement under Section
V Application Review Information. In addition to the project
description, the applicant needs to complete all the standard forms
required for making applications for awards under this announcement.
Applicants seeking financial assistance under this announcement
must file the Standard Form (SF) 424, Application for Federal
Assistance; SF-424A, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs; SF-
424B, Assurances--Non-Construction Programs. The forms may be
reproduced for use in submitting applications. Applicants must sign and
return the standard forms with their application.
Applicants must furnish prior to award an executed copy of the
Standard Form LLL, Certification Regarding Lobbying, when applying for
an award in excess of $100,000. Applicants who have used non-Federal
funds for lobbying activities in connection with receiving assistance
under this announcement shall complete a disclosure form, if
applicable, with their applications (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control number 0348-0046). Applicants must
sign and return the certification with their application.
Applicants must also understand they will be held accountable for
the smoking prohibition included within Public Law 103-227, Title XII
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (also known as the PRO-KIDS Act of 1994). A
copy of the Federal Register notice which implements the smoking
prohibition is included with this form. By signing and submitting the
application, applicants are providing the certification and need not
mail back the certification with the application.
Applicants must make the appropriate certification of their
compliance with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. By
signing and submitting the applications, applicants are providing the
certification and need not mail back the certification form. Complete
the standard forms and the associated certifications and assurances
based on the instructions on the forms. The forms and certifications
may be found at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
Those organizations required to provide proof of non-profit status,
please refer to Section III.3.
Please see Section V.1 for instructions on preparing the full
project description.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Due Date For Letter of Intent or Preapplications: 06/03/2005.
Due Date for Applications: 07/01/2005.
[[Page 24062]]
Explanation of Due Dates
The closing time and date for receipt of applications is referenced
above. Applications received after 4:30 p.m. eastern time on the
closing date will be classified as late.
Deadline: Applications shall be considered as meeting an announced
deadline if they are received on or before the deadline time and date
referenced in Section IV.6. Applicants are responsible for ensuring
applications are mailed or submitted electronically well in advance of
the application due date.
Applications hand carried by applicants, applicant couriers, other
representatives of the applicant, or by overnight/express mail couriers
shall be considered as meeting an announced deadline if they are
received on or before the deadline date, between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., eastern time, at the address referenced in Section
IV.6., between Monday and Friday (excluding Federal holidays).
ACF cannot accommodate transmission of applications by facsimile.
Therefore, applications transmitted to ACF by fax will not be accepted
regardless of date or time of submission and time of receipt.
Late Applications: Applications that do not meet the criteria above
are considered late applications. ACF shall notify each late applicant
that its application will not be considered in the current competition.
Any application received after 4:30 p.m. eastern time on the
deadline date will not be considered for competition.
Applicants using express/overnight mail services should allow two
working days prior to the deadline date for receipt of applications.
Applicants are cautioned that express/overnight mail services do not
always deliver as agreed.
Extension of deadlines: ACF may extend application deadlines when
circumstances such as acts of God (floods, hurricanes, etc.) occur, or
when there are widespread disruptions of mail service, or in other rare
cases. A determination to extend or waive deadline requirements rests
with the Chief Grants Management Officer.
Receipt acknowledgement for application packages will be provided
to applicants who submit their package via mail, courier services, or
by hand delivery. Applicants will receive an electronic acknowledgement
for applications that are submitted via https://www.Grants.gov.
Checklist: You may use the checklist below as a guide when
preparing your application package.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required form or
What to submit Required content format When to submit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Abstract.............. See Sections IV.2 Found in Sections IV.2 By application due date.
and V. and V.
Project Description........... See Sections IV.2 Found in Sections IV.2 By application due date.
and V. and V.
Budget Narrative/Justification See Sections IV.2 Found in Sections IV.2 By application due date.
and V. and V.
SF424......................... See Section IV.2. See https:// By application due date.
www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
SF-LLL Certification Regarding See Section IV.2. See https:// By date of award.
Lobbying. www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
Certification Regarding See Section IV.2. See https:// By date of award.
Environmental Tobacco Smoke. www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
Assurances.................... See Section IV.2. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ By date of award.
programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
Support Letters............... IV.2............. IV.2.................. By application due date.
Non-Federal Commitment Letters IV.2............. IV.2.................. By application due date.
Proof of Non-Profit Status.... See Section III.3 Found in Section III.3 By date of award.
Assurance Regarding Protection IV.2............. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ By application due date.
of Human Subjects. programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Forms: Private, non-profit organizations are encouraged
to submit with their applications the survey located under ``Grant
Related Documents and Forms,'' ``Survey for Private, Non-Profit Grant
Applicants,'' titled, ``Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants,'' at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/forms.htm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required form or
What to submit Required content format When to submit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey for Private, Non-Profit See form......... Found in https:// By application due date.
Grant Applicants. www.acf.hhs.gov/
programs/ofs/
forms.htm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Intergovernmental Review:
State Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
This program is covered under Executive Order 12372,
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,'' and 45 CFR part 100,
``Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services
Programs and Activities.'' Under the Order, States may design their own
processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed Federal assistance
under covered programs.
As of October 1, 2004, the following jurisdictions have elected to
participate in the Executive Order process: Arkansas, California,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa,
Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New
Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, American Samoa, Guam,
North Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. As these
jurisdictions have elected to participate in the Executive Order
process, they have established SPOCs. Applicants from participating
jurisdictions should contact their SPOC, as soon as possible, to alert
them of prospective applications and receive instructions. Applicants
must submit all required materials, if any, to the SPOC and indicate
the date of this submittal (or the date of contact if no submittal is
required) on the
[[Page 24063]]
Standard Form 424, item 16a. Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2).
A SPOC has 60 days from the application deadline to comment on
proposed new or competing continuation awards. SPOCs are encouraged to
eliminate the submission of routine endorsements as official
recommendations. Additionally, SPOCs are requested to clearly
differentiate between mere advisory comments and those official State
process recommendations which may trigger the ``accommodate or
explain'' rule.
When comments are submitted directly to ACF, they should be
addressed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Grants Management,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., 4th
floor, Washington, DC 20447.
Although the remaining jurisdictions have chosen not to participate
in the process, entities that meet the eligibility requirements of the
program are still eligible to apply for a grant even if a State,
Territory, Commonwealth, etc. does not have a SPOC. Therefore,
applicants from these jurisdictions, or for projects administered by
federally-recognized Indian Tribes, need take no action in regard to
E.O. 12372.
The official list, including addresses, of the jurisdictions that
have elected to participate in E.O. 12372 can be found on the following
URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
5. Funding Restrictions: Grant awards will not allow reimbursement
of pre-award costs.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Submission by Mail: An applicant must provide an original
application with all attachments, signed by an authorized
representative and two copies. Please see Section IV.3 for an
explanation of due dates. Applications should be mailed to: Head Start
Research Support Technical Assistance Team, OPRE Grant Review Team,
Xtria, LLC, 8045 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400, Vienna, VA 22182.
Hand Delivery: An applicant must provide an original application
with all attachments signed by an authorized representative and two
copies. The application must be received at the address below by 4:30
p.m. eastern time on or before the closing date. Applications that are
hand delivered will be accepted between the hours of 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday. Applications should be
delivered to: Head Start Research Support Technical Assistance Team,
OPRE Grant Review Team, Xtria, LLC, 8045 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400,
Vienna, VA 22182.
Electronic Submission: Please see Section IV.2 for guidelines and
requirements when submitting applications electronically via https://
www.Grants.gov.
V. Application Review Information
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 25 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed and
reviewing the collection information.
The project description is approved under OMB control number 0970-
0139 which expires 4/30/2007.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
1. Criteria: The following are instructions and guidelines on how
to prepare the ``project summary/abstract'' and ``full project
description'' sections of the application. Under the evaluation
criteria section, note that each criterion is preceded by the generic
evaluation requirement under the ACF Uniform Project Description (UPD).
Part 1--The Project Description Overview
Purpose
The project description provides a major means by which an
application is evaluated and ranked to compete with other applications
for available assistance. The project description should be concise and
complete and should address the activity for which Federal funds are
being requested. Supporting documents should be included where they can
present information clearly and succinctly. In preparing your project
description, information responsive to each of the requested evaluation
criteria must be provided. Awarding offices use this and other
information in making their funding recommendations. It is important,
therefore, that this information be included in the application in a
manner that is clear and complete.
General Instructions
ACF is particularly interested in specific project descriptions
that focus on outcomes and convey strategies for achieving intended
performance. Project descriptions are evaluated on the basis of
substance and measurable outcomes, not length. Extensive exhibits are
not required. Cross-referencing should be used rather than repetition.
Supporting information concerning activities that will not be directly
funded by the grant or information that does not directly pertain to an
integral part of the grant funded activity should be placed in an
appendix.
Pages should be numbered and a table of contents should be included
for easy reference.
Introduction
Applicants required to submit a full project description shall
prepare the project description statement in accordance with the
following instructions while being aware of the specified evaluation
criteria. The text options give a broad overview of what your project
description should include while the evaluation criteria identifies the
measures that will be used to evaluate applications.
Project Summary/Abstract
Provide a summary of the project description (a page or less) with
reference to the funding request.
Objectives and Need for Assistance
Clearly identify the physical, economic, social, financial,
institutional, and/or other problem(s) requiring a solution. The need
for assistance must be demonstrated and the principal and subordinate
objectives of the project must be clearly stated; supporting
documentation, such as letters of support and testimonials from
concerned interests other than the applicant, may be included. Any
relevant data based on planning studies should be included or referred
to in the endnotes/footnotes. Incorporate demographic data and
participant/beneficiary information, as needed. In developing the
project description, the applicant may volunteer or be requested to
provide information on the total range of projects currently being
conducted and supported (or to be initiated), some of which may be
outside the scope of the program announcement.
Results or Benefits Expected
Identify the results and benefits to be derived.
For example, explain how your proposed project will achieve the
specific goals and objectives you have set. Estimate the number of
consortium members you expect to identify. You may also specify
particular individuals who have agreed to become affiliated with the
Center as examples of your knowledge and experience in the areas
[[Page 24064]]
of early childhood development and American Indian Alaska Native
research. If there are particular areas of research where you have a
limited amount of experience, you may propose individuals either at
your institution or another institution that would be willing to be
affiliated with the Center. If you choose this option, please make sure
that a letter of commitment is included with your application. Explain
how the expected results will benefit the population to be served.
Specifically, in meeting its needs for the advancement of American
Indian Alaska Native research that will benefit the larger American
Indian Alaska Native Head Start and early childhood community and for
early learning services and activities: how will the research community
benefit from this project? What benefits will families derive from
these services? How will the services help them? What lessons will be
learned which might help other agencies and organizations that are
addressing the needs of a similar client population?
Approach
Outline a plan of action that describes the scope and detail of how
the proposed work will be accomplished. Account for all functions or
activities identified in the application. Cite factors that might
accelerate or decelerate the work and state your reason for taking the
proposed approach rather than others. Describe any unusual features of
the project such as design or technological innovations, reductions in
cost or time, or extraordinary social and community involvement.
Provide quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the
accomplishments to be achieved for each function or activity in such
terms as the number of people to be served and the number of activities
accomplished.
Evaluation
Provide a narrative addressing how the conduct of the project and
the results of the project will be evaluated. In addressing the
evaluation of results, state how you will determine the extent to which
the project has achieved its stated objectives and the extent to which
the accomplishment of objectives can be attributed to the project.
Discuss the criteria to be used to evaluate results, and explain the
methodology that will be used to determine if the needs identified and
discussed are being met and if the project results and benefits are
being achieved. With respect to the conduct of the project, define the
procedures to be employed to determine whether the project is being
conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented and
discuss the impact of the project's various activities on the project's
effectiveness.
Additional Information
Following are requests for additional information that need to be
included in the application:
Staff and Position Data
Provide a biographical sketch and job description for each key
person appointed. Job descriptions for each vacant key position should
be included as well. As new key staff is appointed, biographical
sketches will also be required.
Organizational Profiles
Provide information on the applicant organization(s) and
cooperating partners, such as organizational charts, financial
statements, audit reports or statements from CPAs/Licensed Public
Accountants, Employer Identification Numbers, names of bond carriers,
contact persons and telephone numbers, child care licenses and other
documentation of professional accreditation, information on compliance
with Federal/State/local government standards, documentation of
experience in the program area, and other pertinent information. If the
applicant is a non-profit organization, submit proof of non-profit
status in its application.
The non-profit agency can accomplish this by providing: (a) a
reference to the applicant organization's listing in the Internal
Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt organizations
described in the IRS Code; (b) a copy of a currently valid IRS tax
exemption certificate, (c) a statement from a State taxing body, State
attorney general, or other appropriate State official certifying that
the applicant organization has a non-profit status and that none of the
net earnings accrue to any private shareholders or individuals; (d) a
certified copy of the organization's certificate of incorporation or
similar document that clearly establishes non-profit status, (e) any of
the items immediately above for a State or national parent organization
and a statement signed by the parent organization that the applicant
organization is a local non-profit affiliate.
Letters of Support
Provide statements from community, public and commercial leaders
that support the project proposed for funding. All submissions should
be included in the application OR by application deadline.
Budget and Budget Justification
Provide a budget with line item detail and detailed calculations
for each budget object class identified on the Budget Information form.
Detailed calculations must include estimation methods, quantities, unit
costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the
calculation to be duplicated. Also include a breakout by the funding
sources identified in Block 15 of the SF-424.
Provide a narrative budget justification that describes how the
categorical costs are derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness,
and allocability of the proposed costs.
General
Use the following guidelines for preparing the budget and budget
justification. Both Federal and non-Federal resources shall be detailed
and justified in the budget and narrative justification. ``Federal
resources'' refers only to the ACF grant for which you are applying.
``Non Federal resources'' are all other Federal and non-Federal
resources. It is suggested that budget amounts and computations be
presented in a columnar format: first column, object class categories;
second column, Federal budget; next column(s), non-Federal budget(s),
and last column, total budget. The budget justification should be a
narrative.
Personnel
Description: Costs of employee salaries and wages.
Justification: Identify the project director or principal
investigator, if known. For each staff person, provide the title, time
commitment to the project (in months), time commitment to the project
(as a percentage or full-time equivalent), annual salary, grant salary,
wage rates, etc. Do not include the costs of consultants or personnel
costs of delegate agencies or of specific project(s) or businesses to
be financed by the applicant.
Fringe Benefits
Description: Costs of employee fringe benefits unless treated as
part of an approved indirect cost rate.
Justification: Provide a breakdown of the amounts and percentages
that comprise fringe benefit costs such as health insurance, FICA,
retirement insurance, taxes, etc.
Travel
Description: Costs of project-related travel by employees of the
applicant
[[Page 24065]]
organization (does not include costs of consultant travel).
Justification: For each trip, show the total number of traveler(s),
travel destination, duration of trip, per diem, mileage allowances, if
privately owned vehicles will be used, and other transportation costs
and subsistence allowances. Travel costs for key staff to attend ACF-
sponsored workshops should be detailed in the budget.
Equipment
Description: ``Equipment'' means an article of nonexpendable,
tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year
and an acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of (a) the
capitalization level established by the organization for the financial
statement purposes, or (b) $5,000. (Note: Acquisition cost means the
net invoice unit price of an item of equipment, including the cost of
any modifications, attachments, accessories, or auxiliary apparatus
necessary to make it usable for the purpose for which it is acquired.
Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty, protective in-transit
insurance, freight, and installation shall be included in or excluded
from acquisition cost in accordance with the organization's regular
written accounting practices.)
Justification: For each type of equipment requested, provide a
description of the equipment, the cost per unit, the number of units,
the total cost, and a plan for use on the project, as well as use or
disposal of the equipment after the project ends. An applicant
organization that uses its own definition for equipment should provide
a copy of its policy or section of its policy which includes the
equipment definition.
Supplies
Description: Costs of all tangible personal property other than
that included under the Equipment category.
Justification: Specify general categories of supplies and their
costs. Show computations and provide other information which supports
the amount requested.
Contractual
Description: Costs of all contracts for services and goods except
for those that belong under other categories such as equipment,
supplies, construction, etc. Include third party evaluation contracts
(if applicable) and contracts with secondary recipient organizations,
including delegate agencies and specific project(s) or businesses to be
financed by the applicant.
Justification: Demonstrate that all procurement transactions will
be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent practical,
open and free competition. Recipients and subrecipients, other than
States that are required to use Part 92 procedures, must justify any
anticipated procurement action that is expected to be awarded without
competition and exceed the simplified acquisition threshold fixed at 41
U.S.C. 403(11) (currently set at $100,000).
Recipients might be required to make available to ACF pre-award
review and procurement documents, such as request for proposals or
invitations for bids, independent cost estimates, etc.
Note: Whenever the applicant intends to delegate part of the
project to another agency, the applicant must provide a detailed
budget and budget narrative for each delegate agency, by agency
title, along with the required supporting information referred to in
these instructions.
Other
Enter the total of all other costs. Such costs, where applicable
and appropriate, may include but are not limited to insurance, food,
medical and dental costs (noncontractual), professional services costs,
space and equipment rentals, printing and publication, computer use,
training costs, such as tuition and stipends, staff development costs,
and administrative costs.
Justification: Provide computations, a narrative description and a
justification for each cost under this category.
Indirect Charges
Description: Total amount of indirect costs. This category should
be used only when the applicant currently has an indirect cost rate
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or
another cognizant Federal agency.
Justification: An applicant that will charge indirect costs to the
grant must enclose a copy of the current rate agreement. If the
applicant organization is in the process of initially developing or
renegotiating a rate, upon notification that an award will be made, it
should immediately develop a tentative indirect cost rate proposal
based on its most recently completed fiscal year, in accordance with
the cognizant agency's guidelines for establishing indirect cost rates,
and submit it to the cognizant agency. Applicants awaiting approval of
their indirect cost proposals may also request indirect costs. When an
indirect cost rate is requested, those costs included in the indirect
cost pool should not also be charged as direct costs to the grant.
Also, if the applicant is requesting a rate which is less than what is
allowed under the program, the authorized representative of the
applicant organization must submit a signed acknowledgement that the
applicant is accepting a lower rate than allowed.
Non-Federal Resources
Description: Amounts of non-Federal resources that will be used to
support the project as identified in Block 15 of the SF-424.
Justification: The firm commitment of these resources must be
documented and submitted with the application so the applicant is given
credit in the review process. A detailed budget must be prepared for
each funding source.
Evaluation Criteria: The following evaluation criteria appear in
weighted descending order. The corresponding score values indicate the
relative importance that ACF places on each evaluation criterion;
however, applicants need not develop their applications precisely
according to the order presented. Application components may be
organized such that a reviewer will be able to follow a seamless and
logical flow of information (i.e., from a broad overview of the project
to more detailed information about how it will be conducted).
In considering how applicants will carry out the responsibilities
addressed under this announcement, competing applications for financial
assistance will be reviewed and evaluated against the following
criteria:
Approach--45 Points
[cir] The extent to which the proposal provides evidence that the
Center will be fully operational within 12 months, including the
establishment of formal relationships with local researchers who will
make up the consortium.
[cir] The extent to which the application clearly states the
activities that the Center will undertake and how they meet the goals
specified.
[cir] The extent to which the proposal develops a plan on how it
will collaborate on research with consortium members, what kinds of
assistance it will provide, and any capacity building activities. It is
important to remember that any research plans should be jointly
developed by the local research institutions and the Head Start or
Early Head Start programs, as well as other relevant tribal
stakeholders they plan to partner with, and approved by the Center in
conjunction with OPRE. The application demonstrates a detailed process
on how the applicant intends on awarding local research projects and
clearly communicate the stipulation that one of the requirements of any
local Principal Investigator is a letter of
[[Page 24066]]
agreement from the Head Start or Early Head Start program the local
P.I. intends on working with, certifying that they have entered into a
partnership with the applicant and the application has been reviewed
and approved by tribal authorities.
[cir] The extent