Registration of Claims to Copyright, Group Registration of Published Photographs, 15587-15590 [05-6059]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
The Coast Guard has considered the
environmental impact of this rule and
concluded that, under figure 2–1,
paragraph (34)(g) of Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, this rule is
categorically excluded from further
environmental documentation. A
‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’
is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From 12:01 a.m. on April 2, 2005 to
11:59 p.m. on April 10, 2005 add
temporary § 165.T01–011 to read as
follows:
I
§ 165.T01–011 Security and Safety Zone;
TOPOFF 3, New London, CT.
(a) Locations. (1) Fort Trumbull Safety
and Security Zone. The following area
is a safety and security zone: All waters
of the Thames River in an area bounded
as follows: beginning at the end of the
New England Seafood pier at
approximate position 41°20′49.7″ N,
072°05′41.6″ W, thence running in an
easterly direction to position
40°20′50.9″ N, 072°05′36.5″ W, thence
in a southeasterly direction to position
41°20′43.1″ N, 072°05′19.7″ W, then
south to position 41°20′34.9″ N,
072°05′19.6″ W, thence southwesterly to
a point on the western shore of the
Thames River at position, 41°20′26.6″ N,
072°05′38.9″ W, thence northerly along
the western shore of the Thames River
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
15587
to a position on the shore of the Thames
River at position 41°20′29.3″ N,
072°05′39.7″ W, thence along the shore
of the Thames River to the point of
beginning.
(2) Ocean Beach Safety and Security
Zone. The following area is a safety and
security zone: All waters of Long Island
Sound off of New London, Connecticut
in an area bounded as follows:
beginning at a position on the shore of
New London Connecticut at position
41°18′31.4″ N, 072°05′39.6″ W, thence
running southeasterly to position
41°18′29.3″ N, 072°05′36.9″ W, thence
running position southwesterly to
position 41°18′11.8″ N, 072°06′2.8″ W,
thence running northwesterly to
position 41°18′14.5″ N, 072°06′6.1″ W,
thence running northeasterly along the
shore to the point of beginning.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective
from 12:01 a.m. on April 2, 2005 until
11:59 p.m. on April 10, 2005.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 and
165.33 of this part, entry into or
movement within these zones is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Long Island
Sound.
(2) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP, or the designated on-scene U.S.
Coast Guard representative. On-scene
Coast Guard patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels.
rule expands the number of conditions
that a State may require in order for
owners to obtain vessel numbering
certificates in that State. The preamble
to the final rule contains an error in the
regulatory evaluation.
DATES: Effective April 18, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Audrey Pickup, Office of Boating Safety,
at Coast Guard Headquarters, telephone
202–267–0872.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In rule FR
Doc. 04–28227 published in the Federal
Register of March 18, 2005 (70 FR
13104), correct the two paragraphs that
appear on page 13104 under the heading
‘‘Regulatory Evaluation’’ to read:
‘‘This final rule is not a ‘significant
regulatory action’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has not reviewed it under
that Order.
‘‘We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.’’
Dated: March 22, 2005.
Peter J. Boynton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. 05–6143 Filed 3–24–05; 12:37 pm]
37 CFR Part 202
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Dated: March 22, 2005.
Steve Venckus,
Chief, Regulations and Administrative Law,
United States Coast Guard, DHS.
[FR Doc. 05–5968 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
[Docket No. RM 2005–3]
Registration of Claims to Copyright,
Group Registration of Published
Photographs
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 174
[USCG–2003–15708]
RIN 1625–AA75
Terms Imposed by States on
Numbering of Vessels
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is correcting
the preamble to a final rule that
appeared in the Federal Register of
March 18, 2005 (70 FR 13102). The final
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the
Library of Congress is amending its final
regulations concerning group
registration of published photographs to
limit to 750 the number of photographs
that may be identified on continuation
sheets submitted with a single
application form and filing fee. The
regulation continues to place no limit
on the number of photographs that may
be included in a single group
registration when the applicant elects
not to use continuation sheets and
instead identifies the date of publication
for each photograph on the deposited
image and the applicant meets the other
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
15588
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory requirements for group
registration of published photographs.
The regulation also clarifies that the
date of publication for each photograph
may be identified in a text file on the
CD–ROM or DVD that contains the
photographic images or on a list that
accompanies the deposit and provides
the publication date for each image.
DATES: Effective March 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David O. Carson, General Counsel, or
Charlotte Douglass, Principal Legal
Advisor, P.O. Box 70400, Washington,
DC 20024–0400, Telephone (202) 707–
8380. Telefax: (202) 707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
copyright law permits a claim to
copyright to be registered in the
Copyright Office at any time during the
subsistence of the copyright, when an
application form is accompanied by the
appropriate deposit of a copyrightable
work and a filing fee. 17 U.S.C. 408(a).
Section 408(b) generally requires the
deposit of two complete copies or
phonorecords of a published work, but
it authorizes the Register of Copyrights
by regulation to reduce the number
deposited for particular classes. 17
U.S.C. 408(c)(1). The Register may also
ameliorate the requirement for
individual registrations where a group
of separately published related works is
sought to be registered together. Id. The
legislative history of the 1976 Copyright
Act offers ‘‘a group of photographs by
one photographer’’ as a possibly
appropriate grouping. H.R. Rep. No.
1476, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 154 (1976).
In 2001, after notice, public comment,
and careful consideration, the Office
established a regulation permitting
group registration of published
photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9). 66 FR
37142 (July 17, 2001). That rule
permitted an unlimited number of
photographs that were taken by the
same person and published within the
same calendar year, and for which the
copyrights are owned by the same
person or entity, to be registered with
one application and fee. An applicant
may choose from three options to
register such a group: The applicant
may either (1) submit a group of
photographs published within three
months before receipt in the Copyright
Office and give the range of dates within
that period on the application for
registration at space 3b; (2) submit a
group of photographs published within
a calendar year, give the range of dates
within that period on the application for
registration at space 3b, and identify
with each deposited image the date of
its publication; or (3) submit a group of
photographs published within a
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
calendar year, give the range of dates
within that period on the application for
registration at space 3b, and identify
each photograph on a continuation
sheet noting thereon its date of
publication.1
During the rulemaking process for
group registration of photographs, the
Office proposed a rule that would limit
the number of photographs that could
be registered in a group to no more than
500. 65 FR 26162, 26166 (May 5, 2000).
In response to the request for comments,
many depositors asserted that the
number of photographs should not be so
limited. 66 FR 37143, 37145 (July 17,
2001). One commenter stated that some
photographers took more than 500
images in one or two days. Another
commenter noted that she produced
thousands of images per quarter. Id. In
response, the Office issued a final rule
that did not limit the number of
photographs that could be submitted
with one group photograph claim. The
Office stated that:
In light of the comments from
photographers observing that the proposed
500-photo limit is too low, the Office has
reexamined its reasons for proposing such a
limit. The Office has concluded that the
administrative burdens of processing a group
registration of a large number of photos in
excess of 500 would be acceptable. Therefore,
the final rule contains no limitation on the
number of photographs that may be included
in a group.
66 FR 37148.
On the basis of this assumed technical
capability of the Office system to handle
a large number of photos, the Office did
not contemplate that it would receive
continuation sheets listing nearly 15,000
photographs, nor did it contemplate that
the production of such certificates
would be as disruptive as it has been to
Office operations. Recent experience
with the end-stage processing of
continuation sheets of a group of
photographs that include more than 750
photographs listed on more than 50
continuation sheets has proved
administratively burdensome. Whatever
the technical capability of Office
equipment might be to produce
certificates with an unlimited number of
continuation sheets, the practical reality
of doing so requires an excessive
amount of staff, time, equipment, and
materials. As a consequence, the cost
effectiveness of making these group
registrations, at the current filing fee of
1 The regulation encouraged applicants to use the
latter option because the registration certificate, of
which the continuation sheets are a part, serves as
prima facie evidence of the date of publication of
a work when it is registered within five years of first
publication.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$30.00 per group, is seriously out of
balance.
To relate recent empirical evidence,
one recent claim consisted of a
staggering total of 1,776 continuation
sheets. The Office required three hours
for initial processing of the claim,
including stamping, examining,
labeling, scanning and packaging the
claim for imaging. The next step to
process the claim, producing the image
for the registration record, required four
and one-half hours to complete and
used 1777 registration number bar code
labels. To print the 1777 page certificate
took an additional one and one-half
hours during which no other printing
could be accomplished on that
equipment. Then, the certificate had to
be packaged and mailed, at an
inordinate expenditure of three and onehalf reams of certificate paper, postage
and packaging costs. Altogether, at the
end stage of the registration process, this
single registration required more than
12 hours to complete. Making matters
worse, the Office currently has on hand
15 additional claims of this kind, at
various stages in registration processing.
Each of these claims is accompanied by
continuation sheets ranging from
approximately 1090 to 2423 in number.
The Office production structure for
registration of claims simply does not
accommodate such a time frame for a
single registration—group or
otherwise—in a system which registered
nearly 661,500 claims in fiscal year
2004.
At the time the final rule on group
registration of photographs was
announced in 2001, the Copyright
Office did not predict that the amount
of staff time, equipment usage, and
production materials that would be
required to produce certificates with a
large number of continuation sheets
would prove so impracticable as to
undermine the Office’s productivity. In
view of recent claims that the Office has
received, including three claims of
2068, 2118 and 2423 pages respectively,
as well as other claims that it anticipates
receiving should this registration
pattern take hold, the Office has
determined that it must now limit to 50
the number of continuation sheets that
may accompany a group registration for
published photographs. The amended
regulation allows for 750 photos to be
listed on the continuation sheets that
are part of the application and made
part of the certificate of registration, and
permits the applicant to submit
additional claims in groups of 750 or
fewer photographs with additional filing
fees for registration where the
continuation sheet option is preferred.
Applicants may continue to submit
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
applications for group registration of
photographs without any limitation on
the number of photographs if they select
one of the options that does not involve
use of continuation sheets.
At some future time, the Office may
be able to resume group registration for
photographs with an unlimited number
of continuation sheets. When the
Office’s business processing systems
have been re-engineered, new
information technology systems will be
employed to accomplish much of the
processing of claims digitally and it may
at that time be possible to liberalize the
current restriction.
The Office is also clarifying that when
an applicant for group registration of
photographs elects not to use
continuation sheets to identify dates of
publication, the option that permits the
dates of publication to be identified ‘‘on
the deposited image’’ does not require
that the date of publication appear on
the deposited image itself. In order to
make this clear, § 202.3(b)(9)(iv) is being
amended to state that the date of
publication may be provided in any of
four different ways: Either (1) on each
deposited image, (2) in a text file on the
CD–ROM or DVD that contains the
deposited photographic images, (3) on a
list that accompanies the deposit and
provides the publication date for each
image, or (4) on the continuation sheet
provided by the Copyright Office.
A notice and comment period is
normally required prior to promulgation
of a regulation. Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b). The
Office has already conducted notice and
comment on this issue and has given
this issue consideration in promulgating
its final rule (See Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, Registration of Claims to
Copyright, Group Registration of
Photographs, 65 FR at 26165 (May 5,
2000); Final Regulation, Registration of
Claims to Copyright, Group Registration
of Photographs, 66 FR at 37148 (July 17,
2001).) That rule concluded that the
administrative burden of processing a
group registration of a large number of
photos in excess of 500 would be
acceptable based on a projection of what
such processing would involve. 66 FR
37148. As detailed above, however,
actual experience has proved otherwise.
Based on recent experience, the Office
has determined that currently it is
administratively unfeasible to continue
to accept applications for group
registrations of photographs with more
than 50 continuation sheets.
The APA waives the requirement for
notice and comment when ‘‘the agency
for good cause finds (and incorporates
the finding and a brief statement of
reasons therefor in the rules issued) that
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
notice and public procedure are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(B). It is impracticable to conduct
prepublication notice and comment
where compliance with the normal APA
procedures would jeopardize the
agency’s assigned missions. See S. Rep.
No. 752, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. 14 (1945);
S. Doc. No. 248, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.
140, 148, 157 (1946). Although the
Office provides a host of other services,
a primary duty of the Copyright Office
is to register claims to copyright. 17
U.S.C. 701(b); 410(a). Prompt
registration is central to the mission of
the Office because it meets the needs of
applicants, obtains new works for
Library of Congress collections, and
promotes creativity by effectively
administering the national registry.
Providing notice and comment for
this rulemaking would be impracticable
because it has become apparent that
providing such notice and awaiting and
evaluating comments would have
potentially serious adverse impacts on
the Office’s ability to comply with its
statutory duties. At an increasing rate,
the Office is receiving group photograph
claims with escalating numbers of
continuation sheets. As noted above,
three recent claims have involved
applications containing as many as 2423
pages. The Office cannot consistently
process thousands of continuation
sheets with one claim and provide
registration services for the volume of
claims it is charged with managing each
year. Further delay would aggravate the
threat that this pattern will continue to
uncontrollable proportions, thus
indicating that notice and comment
would in fact be counterproductive. If
the Office provided prior notice and
comment for its rule limiting the
number of photographs identified on
continuation sheets as part of a group
claim, the delay would exacerbate the
present difficulties by permitting
continued large submissions and
perhaps even encouraging a flurry of
such submissions in order to take
advantage of the existing rules before
the amendment’s effective date,
jeopardizing even more the Office’s
ability to fulfill its responsibility under
the copyright law.
Specifically, pre-publication notice
and comment would harm the Office’s
registration processing function for the
reason that the continued submission of
claims in this manner could affect the
pendency of overall registrations. The
time between filing for registration and
receiving a registration certificate may
increase, and the Office’s expense in
processing these extremely large group
registrations would have no reasonable
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15589
relationship to the fee charged. If the
Office were to devote a disproportionate
amount of time to register such large
group claims, its ability to provide
timely and cost effective service to the
public at large would be negatively
affected. On the other hand, from an
applicant’s point of view, the number
limit is only being placed on
registrations made under one group
option. The other options will remain
open for an unlimited number of
photographs with one application form
and one filing fee, currently $30.00.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act also provides for a notice
of not less than 30 days before the
effective date of a regulation, except as
otherwise provided by the agency for
good cause found and published with
the rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The reasons
for expedited rulemaking here are to
ease an immediate administrative
burden and to forestall the likelihood of
even further administrative hardship.
The Office has only recently begun to
receive applications for group
registrations of photographs containing
hundreds of continuation sheets, but
recent experience indicates that such
applications will continue to be
received, perhaps at an increasing pace.
The Office cannot take the risk of
becoming inundated with a last-minute
rush of large continuation-sheet
submissions to take advantage of the
final days of the present rule. The
amendment’s immediate effective date
will preclude the submission of an
overwhelming number of late claims,
which would further exacerbate the
negative effect such registrations have
on the Copyright Office’s processing
operations.
As part of the ‘‘good cause’’
calibration of the APA’s section
553(d)(3), the necessity for immediate
implementation must be balanced
against the necessity for affected
persons to have a reasonable time to
prepare for the effective date of the new
rule. To date, it appears that the
exceptionally large continuation sheet
claims are being submitted by only one
entity. The Office is directly notifying
that entity of this amendment to the
group registration regulation which has
been necessitated due to problems
caused by registration in this manner.
For registration materials that have been
received by the Copyright Office before
the effective date of this amendment but
are still being processed, the rules
issued in 2001 will continue to apply,
although in particular cases, the Office
may request that the applicant
resubmits separate applications, each
with no more than 50 continuation
sheets. In such cases, no additional fees
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
15590
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
will be assessed and the effective date
of registration will be the date the group
of photographs was originally submitted
in conformity with then current
regulations. With respect to any
applications including more than 50
continuation sheets that are received by
the Office on or after the effective date
of this amendment, the applicant will be
given the option of obtaining a
registration certificate that does not
include the continuation sheets, with
the continuation sheets being included
with the deposit to identify the dates of
publication of the photographic images
as permitted under § 202.3(b)(9)(iv).
This amendment is therefore issued as
a final rule effective on the date it is
published in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Copyright Office, though located
in the Library of Congress and part of
the legislative branch, is not an
‘‘agency’’ subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
Nevertheless, the Register of Copyrights
has considered the effect of a proposed
amendment on small businesses. This
amendment continues to offer
photographers, who usually constitute
small businesses, the ability to register
their copyrights in large groups for a
modest fee while it ensures that the
Copyright Office can process those
registrations in an efficient manner and
at a reasonable cost.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 202
Claims, Copyright.
Final Regulation
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office amends
37 CFR part 202 as follows:
I
1. The authority citation for part 202
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408, 702.
2. Section 202.3 is amended as follows:
(a) By revising paragraph (b)(9)(iv);
(b) By redesignating paragraphs
(b)(9)(v) through (ix) as paragraphs (vi)
through (x); and
I (c) By adding a new paragraph
(b)(9)(v).
The additions and revisions to § 202.3
read as follows:
I
I
I
Registration of copyright.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(9) * * *
(iv) If the photographs in a group were
all published on the same date, the date
of publication must be identified in
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 05–6059 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
PART 202—REGISTRATION OF
CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
§ 202.3
space 3b of the application. If the
photographs in a group were not all
published on the same date, the range
of dates of publication (e.g., February
15–September 15, 2004) must be
provided in space 3b of the application,
and the date of publication of each
photograph within the group must be
identified either:
(A) On each deposited image;
(B) In a text file on the CD–ROM or
DVD that contains the deposited
photographic images;
(C) On a list that accompanies the
deposit and provides the publication
date for each image; or
(D) On a special continuation sheet
provided by the Copyright Office. Dates
of publication must be provided in a
way that clearly identifies the date of
publication for each individual
photograph in the group.
(v) If the applicant chooses to identify
the date of publication for each
photograph in the group on a
continuation sheet, the application may
include no more than 50 continuation
sheets identifying no more than 750
photographs. For these purposes, the
applicant must use the special
continuation sheet for registration of a
group of photographs made available by
the Copyright Office.
*
*
*
*
*
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AM14
Exclusions From Income and Net
Worth Computations
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
adjudication regulations to exclude from
income and net worth computations in
the pension and parents’ dependency
and indemnity compensation programs
benefits or payments received pursuant
to the Medicare Prescription Drug
Discount Card and Transitional
Assistance Program in the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003. This
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
amendment is necessary to conform the
regulations to statutory provisions.
DATES:
Effective date: March 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maya Ferrandino, Consultant (211A),
Compensation and Pension Service,
Policy and Regulations Staff, Veterans
Benefits Administration, 810 Vermont
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420,
(202) 273–7232.
All
income is countable when VA
determines entitlement to income-based
benefits unless specifically excluded by
law. Section 101 of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA),
Public Law 108–173, added section
1860D–31 to the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1395w–141), creating a Medicare
prescription drug discount card and
transitional assistance program. This
program allows Medicare beneficiaries
to pool their purchasing power to secure
substantial discounts on their
medicines. Medicare beneficiaries at or
below 135 percent of the federal poverty
level can qualify for $600 in additional
assistance for the remainder of 2004 and
another $600 in 2005. The drug
discounts and $600 in transitional
assistance became available on June 1,
2004.
A provision of the MMA clarifies the
potential interaction between the drug
discount card and transitional
assistance and VA’s pension and
parents dependency and indemnity
compensation benefits by stating that,
‘‘[t]he availability of negotiated prices or
transitional assistance under this
Section shall not be treated as benefits
or otherwise taken into account in
determining an individual’s eligibility
for, or the amount of benefits under, any
other Federal program.’’ Section 1860D–
31(g)(6) of the Social Security Act.
Therefore, the transitional assistance
program and any savings associated
with the prescription drug discount card
are not income or net worth for VA
purposes. This document amends 38
CFR 3.261, 3.262, 3.263, 3.272, and
3.275 to reflect this statutory change.
This final rule merely restates
statutory provisions. Accordingly, there
is a basis for dispensing with prior
notice and comment and the delayed
effective date provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552
and 553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 58 (Monday, March 28, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15587-15590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6059]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 202
[Docket No. RM 2005-3]
Registration of Claims to Copyright, Group Registration of
Published Photographs
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is amending
its final regulations concerning group registration of published
photographs to limit to 750 the number of photographs that may be
identified on continuation sheets submitted with a single application
form and filing fee. The regulation continues to place no limit on the
number of photographs that may be included in a single group
registration when the applicant elects not to use continuation sheets
and instead identifies the date of publication for each photograph on
the deposited image and the applicant meets the other
[[Page 15588]]
regulatory requirements for group registration of published
photographs. The regulation also clarifies that the date of publication
for each photograph may be identified in a text file on the CD-ROM or
DVD that contains the photographic images or on a list that accompanies
the deposit and provides the publication date for each image.
DATES: Effective March 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David O. Carson, General Counsel, or
Charlotte Douglass, Principal Legal Advisor, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024-0400, Telephone (202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202)
707-8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The copyright law permits a claim to
copyright to be registered in the Copyright Office at any time during
the subsistence of the copyright, when an application form is
accompanied by the appropriate deposit of a copyrightable work and a
filing fee. 17 U.S.C. 408(a). Section 408(b) generally requires the
deposit of two complete copies or phonorecords of a published work, but
it authorizes the Register of Copyrights by regulation to reduce the
number deposited for particular classes. 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1). The
Register may also ameliorate the requirement for individual
registrations where a group of separately published related works is
sought to be registered together. Id. The legislative history of the
1976 Copyright Act offers ``a group of photographs by one
photographer'' as a possibly appropriate grouping. H.R. Rep. No. 1476,
94th Cong., 2d Sess. 154 (1976).
In 2001, after notice, public comment, and careful consideration,
the Office established a regulation permitting group registration of
published photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9). 66 FR 37142 (July 17, 2001).
That rule permitted an unlimited number of photographs that were taken
by the same person and published within the same calendar year, and for
which the copyrights are owned by the same person or entity, to be
registered with one application and fee. An applicant may choose from
three options to register such a group: The applicant may either (1)
submit a group of photographs published within three months before
receipt in the Copyright Office and give the range of dates within that
period on the application for registration at space 3b; (2) submit a
group of photographs published within a calendar year, give the range
of dates within that period on the application for registration at
space 3b, and identify with each deposited image the date of its
publication; or (3) submit a group of photographs published within a
calendar year, give the range of dates within that period on the
application for registration at space 3b, and identify each photograph
on a continuation sheet noting thereon its date of publication.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The regulation encouraged applicants to use the latter
option because the registration certificate, of which the
continuation sheets are a part, serves as prima facie evidence of
the date of publication of a work when it is registered within five
years of first publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the rulemaking process for group registration of
photographs, the Office proposed a rule that would limit the number of
photographs that could be registered in a group to no more than 500. 65
FR 26162, 26166 (May 5, 2000). In response to the request for comments,
many depositors asserted that the number of photographs should not be
so limited. 66 FR 37143, 37145 (July 17, 2001). One commenter stated
that some photographers took more than 500 images in one or two days.
Another commenter noted that she produced thousands of images per
quarter. Id. In response, the Office issued a final rule that did not
limit the number of photographs that could be submitted with one group
photograph claim. The Office stated that:
In light of the comments from photographers observing that the
proposed 500-photo limit is too low, the Office has reexamined its
reasons for proposing such a limit. The Office has concluded that
the administrative burdens of processing a group registration of a
large number of photos in excess of 500 would be acceptable.
Therefore, the final rule contains no limitation on the number of
photographs that may be included in a group.
66 FR 37148.
On the basis of this assumed technical capability of the Office
system to handle a large number of photos, the Office did not
contemplate that it would receive continuation sheets listing nearly
15,000 photographs, nor did it contemplate that the production of such
certificates would be as disruptive as it has been to Office
operations. Recent experience with the end-stage processing of
continuation sheets of a group of photographs that include more than
750 photographs listed on more than 50 continuation sheets has proved
administratively burdensome. Whatever the technical capability of
Office equipment might be to produce certificates with an unlimited
number of continuation sheets, the practical reality of doing so
requires an excessive amount of staff, time, equipment, and materials.
As a consequence, the cost effectiveness of making these group
registrations, at the current filing fee of $30.00 per group, is
seriously out of balance.
To relate recent empirical evidence, one recent claim consisted of
a staggering total of 1,776 continuation sheets. The Office required
three hours for initial processing of the claim, including stamping,
examining, labeling, scanning and packaging the claim for imaging. The
next step to process the claim, producing the image for the
registration record, required four and one-half hours to complete and
used 1777 registration number bar code labels. To print the 1777 page
certificate took an additional one and one-half hours during which no
other printing could be accomplished on that equipment. Then, the
certificate had to be packaged and mailed, at an inordinate expenditure
of three and one-half reams of certificate paper, postage and packaging
costs. Altogether, at the end stage of the registration process, this
single registration required more than 12 hours to complete. Making
matters worse, the Office currently has on hand 15 additional claims of
this kind, at various stages in registration processing. Each of these
claims is accompanied by continuation sheets ranging from approximately
1090 to 2423 in number. The Office production structure for
registration of claims simply does not accommodate such a time frame
for a single registration--group or otherwise--in a system which
registered nearly 661,500 claims in fiscal year 2004.
At the time the final rule on group registration of photographs was
announced in 2001, the Copyright Office did not predict that the amount
of staff time, equipment usage, and production materials that would be
required to produce certificates with a large number of continuation
sheets would prove so impracticable as to undermine the Office's
productivity. In view of recent claims that the Office has received,
including three claims of 2068, 2118 and 2423 pages respectively, as
well as other claims that it anticipates receiving should this
registration pattern take hold, the Office has determined that it must
now limit to 50 the number of continuation sheets that may accompany a
group registration for published photographs. The amended regulation
allows for 750 photos to be listed on the continuation sheets that are
part of the application and made part of the certificate of
registration, and permits the applicant to submit additional claims in
groups of 750 or fewer photographs with additional filing fees for
registration where the continuation sheet option is preferred.
Applicants may continue to submit
[[Page 15589]]
applications for group registration of photographs without any
limitation on the number of photographs if they select one of the
options that does not involve use of continuation sheets.
At some future time, the Office may be able to resume group
registration for photographs with an unlimited number of continuation
sheets. When the Office's business processing systems have been re-
engineered, new information technology systems will be employed to
accomplish much of the processing of claims digitally and it may at
that time be possible to liberalize the current restriction.
The Office is also clarifying that when an applicant for group
registration of photographs elects not to use continuation sheets to
identify dates of publication, the option that permits the dates of
publication to be identified ``on the deposited image'' does not
require that the date of publication appear on the deposited image
itself. In order to make this clear, Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(iv) is being
amended to state that the date of publication may be provided in any of
four different ways: Either (1) on each deposited image, (2) in a text
file on the CD-ROM or DVD that contains the deposited photographic
images, (3) on a list that accompanies the deposit and provides the
publication date for each image, or (4) on the continuation sheet
provided by the Copyright Office.
A notice and comment period is normally required prior to
promulgation of a regulation. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b). The Office has already conducted notice and comment on this
issue and has given this issue consideration in promulgating its final
rule (See Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Registration of Claims to
Copyright, Group Registration of Photographs, 65 FR at 26165 (May 5,
2000); Final Regulation, Registration of Claims to Copyright, Group
Registration of Photographs, 66 FR at 37148 (July 17, 2001).) That rule
concluded that the administrative burden of processing a group
registration of a large number of photos in excess of 500 would be
acceptable based on a projection of what such processing would involve.
66 FR 37148. As detailed above, however, actual experience has proved
otherwise. Based on recent experience, the Office has determined that
currently it is administratively unfeasible to continue to accept
applications for group registrations of photographs with more than 50
continuation sheets.
The APA waives the requirement for notice and comment when ``the
agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and
public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(B). It is impracticable to conduct
prepublication notice and comment where compliance with the normal APA
procedures would jeopardize the agency's assigned missions. See S. Rep.
No. 752, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. 14 (1945); S. Doc. No. 248, 79th Cong.,
2d Sess. 140, 148, 157 (1946). Although the Office provides a host of
other services, a primary duty of the Copyright Office is to register
claims to copyright. 17 U.S.C. 701(b); 410(a). Prompt registration is
central to the mission of the Office because it meets the needs of
applicants, obtains new works for Library of Congress collections, and
promotes creativity by effectively administering the national registry.
Providing notice and comment for this rulemaking would be
impracticable because it has become apparent that providing such notice
and awaiting and evaluating comments would have potentially serious
adverse impacts on the Office's ability to comply with its statutory
duties. At an increasing rate, the Office is receiving group photograph
claims with escalating numbers of continuation sheets. As noted above,
three recent claims have involved applications containing as many as
2423 pages. The Office cannot consistently process thousands of
continuation sheets with one claim and provide registration services
for the volume of claims it is charged with managing each year. Further
delay would aggravate the threat that this pattern will continue to
uncontrollable proportions, thus indicating that notice and comment
would in fact be counterproductive. If the Office provided prior notice
and comment for its rule limiting the number of photographs identified
on continuation sheets as part of a group claim, the delay would
exacerbate the present difficulties by permitting continued large
submissions and perhaps even encouraging a flurry of such submissions
in order to take advantage of the existing rules before the amendment's
effective date, jeopardizing even more the Office's ability to fulfill
its responsibility under the copyright law.
Specifically, pre-publication notice and comment would harm the
Office's registration processing function for the reason that the
continued submission of claims in this manner could affect the pendency
of overall registrations. The time between filing for registration and
receiving a registration certificate may increase, and the Office's
expense in processing these extremely large group registrations would
have no reasonable relationship to the fee charged. If the Office were
to devote a disproportionate amount of time to register such large
group claims, its ability to provide timely and cost effective service
to the public at large would be negatively affected. On the other hand,
from an applicant's point of view, the number limit is only being
placed on registrations made under one group option. The other options
will remain open for an unlimited number of photographs with one
application form and one filing fee, currently $30.00.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act also provides for a
notice of not less than 30 days before the effective date of a
regulation, except as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The reasons for
expedited rulemaking here are to ease an immediate administrative
burden and to forestall the likelihood of even further administrative
hardship. The Office has only recently begun to receive applications
for group registrations of photographs containing hundreds of
continuation sheets, but recent experience indicates that such
applications will continue to be received, perhaps at an increasing
pace. The Office cannot take the risk of becoming inundated with a
last-minute rush of large continuation-sheet submissions to take
advantage of the final days of the present rule. The amendment's
immediate effective date will preclude the submission of an
overwhelming number of late claims, which would further exacerbate the
negative effect such registrations have on the Copyright Office's
processing operations.
As part of the ``good cause'' calibration of the APA's section
553(d)(3), the necessity for immediate implementation must be balanced
against the necessity for affected persons to have a reasonable time to
prepare for the effective date of the new rule. To date, it appears
that the exceptionally large continuation sheet claims are being
submitted by only one entity. The Office is directly notifying that
entity of this amendment to the group registration regulation which has
been necessitated due to problems caused by registration in this
manner. For registration materials that have been received by the
Copyright Office before the effective date of this amendment but are
still being processed, the rules issued in 2001 will continue to apply,
although in particular cases, the Office may request that the applicant
resubmits separate applications, each with no more than 50 continuation
sheets. In such cases, no additional fees
[[Page 15590]]
will be assessed and the effective date of registration will be the
date the group of photographs was originally submitted in conformity
with then current regulations. With respect to any applications
including more than 50 continuation sheets that are received by the
Office on or after the effective date of this amendment, the applicant
will be given the option of obtaining a registration certificate that
does not include the continuation sheets, with the continuation sheets
being included with the deposit to identify the dates of publication of
the photographic images as permitted under Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(iv).
This amendment is therefore issued as a final rule effective on the
date it is published in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Copyright Office, though located in the Library of Congress and
part of the legislative branch, is not an ``agency'' subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612. Nevertheless, the
Register of Copyrights has considered the effect of a proposed
amendment on small businesses. This amendment continues to offer
photographers, who usually constitute small businesses, the ability to
register their copyrights in large groups for a modest fee while it
ensures that the Copyright Office can process those registrations in an
efficient manner and at a reasonable cost.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 202
Claims, Copyright.
Final Regulation
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office amends
37 CFR part 202 as follows:
PART 202--REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
0
1. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408, 702.
0
2. Section 202.3 is amended as follows:
0
(a) By revising paragraph (b)(9)(iv);
0
(b) By redesignating paragraphs (b)(9)(v) through (ix) as paragraphs
(vi) through (x); and
0
(c) By adding a new paragraph (b)(9)(v).
The additions and revisions to Sec. 202.3 read as follows:
Sec. 202.3 Registration of copyright.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(9) * * *
(iv) If the photographs in a group were all published on the same
date, the date of publication must be identified in space 3b of the
application. If the photographs in a group were not all published on
the same date, the range of dates of publication (e.g., February 15-
September 15, 2004) must be provided in space 3b of the application,
and the date of publication of each photograph within the group must be
identified either:
(A) On each deposited image;
(B) In a text file on the CD-ROM or DVD that contains the deposited
photographic images;
(C) On a list that accompanies the deposit and provides the
publication date for each image; or
(D) On a special continuation sheet provided by the Copyright
Office. Dates of publication must be provided in a way that clearly
identifies the date of publication for each individual photograph in
the group.
(v) If the applicant chooses to identify the date of publication
for each photograph in the group on a continuation sheet, the
application may include no more than 50 continuation sheets identifying
no more than 750 photographs. For these purposes, the applicant must
use the special continuation sheet for registration of a group of
photographs made available by the Copyright Office.
* * * * *
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 05-6059 Filed 3-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P