Karnal Bunt; Revision of Regulations for Importing Wheat, 8229-8233 [05-3141]
Download as PDF
8229
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 33
Friday, February 18, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. 02–057–2]
RIN 0579–AB74
Karnal Bunt; Revision of Regulations
for Importing Wheat
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are amending our
regulations regarding the importation of
wheat from regions affected with Karnal
bunt. Our amendments, among other
things, list such regions, as well as
articles regulated for Karnal bunt;
increase the flexibility of the regulations
so that they provide more readily for the
recognition of areas where Karnal bunt
is not known to occur within regions
where Karnal bunt is known to be
present; describe conditions, including
requirements for phytosanitary
certificates, under which wheat and
related articles from regions affected
with Karnal bunt are imported into the
United States; and specify cleaning and/
or disinfection requirements for
imported farm machinery and other
equipment used to handle or store
Karnal bunt-positive seed or host crops.
The changes make our regulations
regarding the importation of wheat and
related articles from regions affected
with Karnal bunt substantively
equivalent to our domestic Karnal bunt
regulations and make the former
consistent with international
agreements to which the United States
is a party.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jeanne Van Dersal, Import Specialist,
Phytosanitary Issues Management Team,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:38 Feb 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 140,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301) 734–
6799.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of
wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum
wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale
(Triticum aestivum × Secale cereale), a
hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is
caused by the smut fungus Tilletia
indica (Mitra) Mundkur and is spread
by spores, primarily through the
movement of infected seed. Our Karnal
bunt-related import regulations are
contained in Subpart—Wheat Diseases
(7 CFR 319.59 through 319.59–2).
On March 3, 2004, we published in
the Federal Register (69 FR 9976–9982,
Docket No. 02–057–1) a proposal to
amend the regulations by listing regions
affected with Karnal bunt, as well as
articles that would be regulated for
Karnal bunt; increasing the flexibility of
the regulations so that they could
provide more readily for the recognition
of areas where Karnal bunt is not known
to occur within regions where Karnal
bunt is known to be present; describing
conditions, including requirements for
phytosanitary certificates, under which
wheat and related articles from regions
affected with Karnal bunt could be
imported into the United States; and
specifying cleaning and/or disinfection
requirements for imported farm
machinery and other equipment used to
handle or store Karnal bunt-positive
seed or host crops. The proposed
changes would make our regulations
regarding the importation of wheat and
related articles from regions affected
with Karnal bunt substantively
equivalent to our domestic Karnal bunt
regulations and would make the former
consistent with international
agreements to which the United States
is a party.
We solicited comments concerning
our proposal for 60 days ending May 3,
2004. We received two comments by
that date, both from representatives of
domestic wheat industry groups. Both
commenters were in favor of the
proposed rule.
However, one commenter offered
suggestions for changes to the
background information contained in
the preamble of the proposed rule.
These suggestions are discussed below.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The commenter noted that the
proposed rule’s economic analysis
mentioned, but did not identify, five
durum-producing Mexican States in
addition to the States of Sonora and Baja
California (i.e., the States where the
Mexicali Valley, a Karnal bunt-free area
already recognized in the regulations, is
located). The commenter identified four
of the five Mexican States and offered
relative per-State percentages for durum
production in Mexico and suggested
that, due to transportation costs and
other considerations within Mexico,
more wheat originating in the Mexican
State of Sonora may be exported to the
United States than had been explored in
the economic analysis.
While increased Mexican wheat
imports from Mexico may occur, as the
commenter suggests, our economic
analysis concludes that the effects are
likely to be small relative to the value
of the domestic industry. The
commenter did not provide evidence to
the contrary. We are making no changes
in response to this comment.
With respect to the five durumproducing Mexican States mentioned
but not specifically identified in the
proposed rule, we have updated the
economic analysis for this final rule to
identify these five States, which are
Chihuahua, Guanajuato, Jalisco,
Michocan, and Queretaro.
The commenter pointed out that
Karnal bunt has been reported in
additional countries not mentioned in
the background information in the
preamble of the proposed rule. These
countries are Nepal, Iran, and South
Africa.
The countries we mentioned in the
proposed rule are those countries that
have been listed in the wheat import
regulations as countries where Karnal
bunt is known to exist. In this final rule,
we have updated the regulatory text of
§ 319.59–4(b)(1) to include those
additional countries on that paragraph’s
list of countries where Karnal bunt is
known to occur.
In addition to that change, we are also
amending the definition of inspector in
this final rule to reflect the reassignment
of certain responsibilities from the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service to the Department of Homeland
Security’s Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection by the Homeland
Security Act of 2002.
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
8230
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 33 / Friday, February 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Other Changes
In addition to the changes discussed
above, we have also made two other
changes in this final rule in order to
ensure that the regulations are internally
consistent. First, in § 319.59–4(a)(2) of
the proposed rule, we listed Triticum
spp. (wheat) plants among the articles
designated as regulated articles for
Karnal bunt, and in paragraph (c) of that
section we described the conditions
under which regulated articles could be
imported from regions where Karnal
bunt is known to occur. However, under
§ 319.59–2(a), the importation of
Triticum spp. plants into the United
States from any country except Canada
is prohibited. In order to avoid any
potential confusion between the
provisions in §§ 319.59–2 and 319.59–4,
we have removed wheat plants from the
list of regulated articles for Karnal bunt
so it does not appear that wheat plants
could be imported into the United
States under the conditions described in
§ 319.59–4(c).
The other change is similar in nature.
Specifically, in § 319.59–4(b)(1) we list
regions where Karnal bunt is known to
occur, and paragraph (c) of that section
describes the conditions under which
regulated articles, including articles of
Triticum spp., could be imported from
those regions. However, several of the
regions listed in § 319.59–4(b)(1) are
also listed in § 319.59–3(b) as regions
from which the importation of certain
articles, including articles of Triticum
spp., is prohibited due to flag smut. In
order to prevent a conflict between
those two sets of provisions, we have
amended the conditions for the
importation of regulated articles from
regions where Karnal bunt exists
(§ 319.59–4[c]) to provide that the
regulated articles will be eligible for
importation only if they are not
otherwise prohibited under § 319.59–3.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, with the changes discussed in this
document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. The rule has
been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
This rule amends the import
regulations pertaining to Karnal bunt to
make them substantively equivalent to
the domestic Karnal bunt regulations
and will help the United States meet its
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:38 Feb 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
obligations under international
agreements to which it is a party.
For this rule, we have prepared an
economic analysis. The economic
analysis provides a cost-benefit analysis
as required by Executive Order 12866,
as well as an analysis of the potential
economic effects of this rule on small
entities, as required under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
economic analysis is summarized
below. Copies of the full analysis are
available by writing or calling the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
The economic analysis investigates
the potential economic effects in the
United States that may result from the
removal of Karnal bunt-related
restrictions on wheat imports. It is
anticipated that any additional wheat
imports that do occur as a result of this
rule would be from Mexico. There are
five Mexican States that appear to meet
the requirements in this rule for Karnal
bunt-free status. These States are
Chihuahua, Guanajuato, Jalisco,
Michocan, and Queretaro. The Mexicali
Valley in Sonora 1 and Baja California
was declared Karnal bunt-free in 1998
and is therefore not directly affected by
this rule. Other countries affected with
Karnal bunt which may be eligible to
export wheat to the United States under
the regulations may still be precluded
from doing so for a number of reasons,
including the presence of other wheat
pests.
Any new wheat imports into the
United States from Mexico are likely to
be durum wheat. In Mexico, demand for
durum wheat is limited because the
demand for pasta is limited. However,
Mexican wheat producers favor durum
wheat due to its higher yield and
disease resistance, creating a small
surplus of durum for export. Mexican
wheat exports since 1995 have been
almost exclusively durum wheat.
Because Mexican wheat exports have
been so concentrated in durum wheat,
it is expected that any additional
imports into the United States from any
new Karnal bunt-free areas in Mexico
would also be durum wheat. For the
period 1998–2001, the annual average
durum wheat production in the United
States was about 3 million metric tons
(MT). Imports of durum wheat from all
sources averaged about 458,000 MT.
Approximately 2 percent of those
imports were from the Karnal bunt-free
area of Mexico.2
1 Total Mexican wheat production and exports
declined considerably in 2002 and 2003 due to a
severe water shortage for crop irrigation in the
principal wheat producing State of Sonora.
2 Sources: Economic Research Service, USDA,
Department of Commerce (DOC), U.S. Census
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Our economic analysis considers two
scenarios for expanded U.S. wheat
imports from Mexico, assuming no
displacement of other imports. The first
scenario analyzes the impact of
additional Mexican durum wheat
exports to the United States of an
amount equal to 1 percent of total wheat
production in the five additional
Mexican States cited previously (about
7,000 MT). This reflects the fact that
about 1 percent of the wheat production
in the Mexicali Valley, which is already
eligible to be shipped to the United
States, is indeed exported to the United
States.3 The second scenario analyzes
the impact of additional Mexican durum
wheat exports of an amount equal to 12
percent of total wheat production in
those five States (about 87,000 MT). For
the period 1998–2001, Mexican wheat
exports to the world represented on
average approximately 11.6 percent of
total Mexican wheat production
annually.4
There are reasons to believe that new
imports would be limited and that the
first scenario more closely approximates
the amount of Mexican wheat that may
eventually enter the U.S. market. Under
this scenario, the new imports are
estimated to be an addition of 7,280 MT,
which approximates the 1 percent share
of Mexican wheat production in the
Mexicali Valley that was exported to the
United States between 1998 and 2001.
The Mexicali Valley is one of Mexico’s
largest wheat producing areas. It is also
closer to the United States than the
Mexican population centers in central
and southern Mexico. Transportation
costs to the Mexican population centers
from this area are high because rail lines
must traverse mountains. Despite the
fact that the U.S. market has been open
to imports of wheat from this area since
1998, Mexican wheat exports directed to
the United States between 1998 and
2001 have averaged less than 5 percent
of all Mexican wheat exports.
Another reason to believe that the
quantity of new wheat imports from
Mexico that may occur as a result of this
rule would be small is due to the fact
that the five additional Mexican States
identified previously are producing less
than 25 percent of all Mexican wheat,
and little durum wheat. At present,
Bureau, Foreign Trade Statistics, and Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(FAO).
3 Mexico produced an average annual 3.2 million
MT of wheat for the period 1998–2001. Wheat
grown in the Mexicali Valley in Sonora and Baja
California accounted for about 18.6 percent of that
total. Over the same time period, an average of
8,754 MT of durum wheat was exported to the
United States annually, presumably from the Karnal
bunt-free Mexicali Valley. Sources: DOC and FAO.
4 FAO.
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 33 / Friday, February 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
durum wheat production in Mexico is
concentrated in the northwestern
portion of the country. It has been
estimated that 75 percent of Mexican
durum wheat production occurs in
Sonora, 13 percent in Baja California,
and 5 percent in Sinoloa.5
In addition, Mexico’s population
consumes far more wheat than the
country produces, as is evident in its
status as a net importer. The Mexican
population is concentrated in the
central and southern part of the country.
With the exception of Chihuahua, the
five Mexican States considered in the
analysis are in the central part of
Mexico. The transportation of wheat
from these States to the United States
would be more difficult and more costly
than to closer Mexican population
centers. This makes it likely that the
shift to production for export in the five
States will be limited.
The entry of additional durum wheat
from Mexico into U.S. markets would
induce producer losses for U.S.
producers of durum wheat and
consumer gains. Under the most likely
scenario of new wheat imports of 7,280
MT, and assuming a demand elasticity
of ·0.35 and a supply elasticity of 0.34,
prices of durum wheat could potentially
decrease by about 0.3 percent.
Producers would potentially lose about
$1.122 million while consumers
potentially gain $1.123 million. The net
benefit in this scenario would be about
$1,000. Under the less likely scenario of
a new import quantity of approximately
87,000 MT, durum wheat prices could
decline by 4 percent. Consumer gains of
$13.539 million would offset producer
losses of $13.353 million, resulting in a
net benefit of $186,000. In both cases,
consumer benefits would be slightly
higher than producer losses, which
would lead to a net positive impact on
the overall economy. To put the
producer surplus reductions in
perspective, the average annual value of
durum wheat production in the United
States for 1998–2001 was $326.3
million. Thus, while the additional
imports from Mexico would affect
domestic producers of durum wheat,
those effects are expected to be small
relative to the value of the industry. It
should also be noted that the actual loss
to domestic producers is likely to be
smaller than the magnitudes estimated,
as the analysis does not consider the
displacement of other imports.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) has established guidelines for
determining which establishments are
to be considered small under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. According to
5 U.S.
Wheat Associates.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:38 Feb 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
the standard established by the SBA for
agricultural producers, a producer with
less than $0.75 million in annual sales
is considered a small entity. Of the
241,334 U.S. wheat farms in 1997, at
least 92 percent were considered small.6
The number of durum wheat producers
is not known. It is likely that durum
wheat producers affected by the rule
would be considered small entities.
However, as was discussed above,
increased Mexican wheat imports from
Mexico would likely have a small
adverse impact on domestic producers.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts
all State and local laws and regulations
that are inconsistent with this rule; (2)
has no retroactive effect; and (3) does
not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB control number
0579–0240.
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA),
which requires Government agencies in
general to provide the public the option
of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible. For information
pertinent to GPEA compliance related to
this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 734–7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Honey,
Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
6 1997 Census of Agriculture, USDA–NASS.
Breakdown shows 2.4 percent of wheat farms with
sales in excess of $1 million, and 5.2 percent with
sales between $0.5 and $0.999 million.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8231
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 319 as follows:
n
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
n
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450 and 7701–7772; 21
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
2. Subpart—Wheat Diseases, §§ 319.59
through 319.59–2, is revised to read as
follows:
n
Subpart—Wheat Diseases
Sec.
319.59–1 Definitions.
319.59–2 General import prohibitions;
exceptions.
319.59–3 Flag smut.
319.59–4 Karnal bunt.
§ 319.59–1
Definitions.
Administrator. The Administrator of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, United States Department of
Agriculture, or any employee of the
United States Department of Agriculture
delegated to act in his or her stead.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS). The Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
Foreign strains of flag smut. Plant
diseases caused by foreign strains of
highly infective fungi, Urocystis
agropyri (Preuss) Schroet., which attack
wheat and substantially reduce its yield,
and which are new to, or not widely
prevalent or distributed within and
throughout, the United States.
From. An article is considered to be
‘‘from’’ any country or locality in which
it was grown.
Grain. Wheat (Triticum aestivum),
durum wheat (Triticum durum), and
triticale (Triticum aestivum X Secale
cereale) used for consumption or
processing.
Hay. Host crops cut and dried for
feeding to livestock. Hay cut after
reaching the dough stage may contain
mature kernels of the host crop.
Host crops. Plants or plant parts,
including grain, seed, or hay, of wheat
(Triticum aestivum), durum wheat
(Triticum durum), and triticale
(Triticum aestivum X Secale cereale).
Inspector. Any individual authorized
by the Administrator of APHIS or the
Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security, to enforce the
regulations in this subpart.
Karnal bunt. A plant disease caused
by the fungus Tilletia indica (Mitra)
Mundkur.
Plant. Any plant (including any plant
part) for or capable of propagation,
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
8232
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 33 / Friday, February 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
including a tree, a tissue culture, a
plantlet culture, pollen, a shrub, a vine,
a cutting, a graft, a scion, a bud, a bulb,
a root, and a seed.
Seed. Wheat (Triticum aestivum),
durum wheat (Triticum durum), and
triticale (Triticum aestivum × Secale
cereale) used for propagation.
Spp. (species). All species, clones,
cultivars, strains, varieties, and hybrids,
of a genus.
Straw. The vegetative material left
after the harvest of host crops. Straw is
generally used as animal feed or
bedding, as mulch, or for erosion
control.
United States. The States, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam,
the Virgin Islands of the United States,
or any other territory or possession of
the United States.
§ 319.59–2 General import prohibitions;
exceptions.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, importation of
Triticum spp. plants into the United
States from any country except Canada
is prohibited. This prohibition does not
include seed.
(b) Triticum spp. plants, articles
prohibited because of flag smut in
§ 319.59–3(a), and articles regulated for
Karnal bunt in § 319.59–4(a) may be
imported by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture for experimental or
scientific purposes if:
(1) Imported at the Plant Germplasm
Quarantine Center, Building 320,
Beltsville Agricultural Center East,
Beltsville, MD 20705, or at any port of
entry with an asterisk listed in § 319.37–
14(b) of this part;
(2) Imported pursuant to a
departmental permit issued for such
article and kept on file at the Plant
Germplasm Quarantine Center;
(3) Imported under conditions of
treatment, processing, growing,
shipment, or disposal specified on the
departmental permit and found by the
Administrator to be adequate to prevent
the introduction into the United States
of tree, plant, or fruit diseases
(including foreign strains of flag smut),
injurious insects, and other plant pests,
and
(4) Imported with a departmental tag
or label securely attached to the outside
of the container containing the article or
securely attached to the article itself if
not in a container, and with such tag or
label bearing a departmental permit
number corresponding to the number of
the departmental permit issued for such
article.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:38 Feb 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
§ 319.59–3
Flag smut.
The articles listed in paragraph (a) of
this section from the regions listed in
paragraph (b) of this section are
prohibited articles because of foreign
strains of flag smut and are prohibited
from being imported or offered for entry
into the United States except as
provided in § 319.59–2(b).
(a) The following articles of Triticum
spp. (wheat) or of Aegilops spp. (barb
goatgrass, goatgrass):
(1) Seeds, plants, and straw (other
than straw, with or without heads,
which has been processed or
manufactured for use indoors, such as
for decorative purposes or for use in
toys); chaff; and products of the milling
process (i.e., bran, shorts, thistle sharps,
and pollards) other than flour; and
(2) Seeds of Melilotus indica (annual
yellow sweetclover) and seeds of any
other field crops that have been
separated from wheat during the
screening process.
(b) Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia,
Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh,
Belarus, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Cyprus,
Egypt, Estonia, Falkland Islands,
Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary,
India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Libya,
Lithuania, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal,
North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Portugal,
Romania, Russia, Spain, Tajikistan,
Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey,
Turkmenistan, South Africa, South
Korea, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and
Venezuela.
§ 319.59–4
Karnal bunt.
(a) Regulated articles. The following
are regulated articles for Karnal bunt:
(1) Conveyances, including trucks,
railroad cars, and other containers used
to move host crops from a region listed
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that
test positive for Karnal bunt through the
presence of bunted kernels;
(2) Plant parts, including grain, seed,
straw, or hay, of all varieties of wheat
(Triticum aestivum), durum wheat
(Triticum durum), and triticale
(Triticum aestivum × Secale cereale)
from a region listed in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, except for straw/stalks/
seed heads for decorative purposes that
have been processed or manufactured
prior to movement and are intended for
use indoors;
(3) Tilletia indica (Mitra) Mundkur;
(4) Mechanized harvesting equipment
that has been used in the production of
wheat, durum wheat, or triticale that
has tested positive for Karnal bunt
through the presence of bunted kernels;
and
(5) Seed conditioning equipment and
storage/handling equipment that has
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
been used in the production of wheat,
durum wheat, or triticale seed found to
contain the spores of Tilletia indica.
(b)(1) Karnal bunt is known to occur
in the following regions: Afghanistan,
India, Iran, Iraq, Mexico, Nepal,
Pakistan, and South Africa.
(2) The Administrator may recognize
an area within a region listed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section as an
area free of Karnal bunt whenever he or
she determines that the area meets the
requirements of the International
Standard for Phytosanitary Measures
(ISPM) No. 4, ‘‘Requirements for the
establishment of pest free areas.’’ The
international standard was established
by the International Plant Protection
Convention of the United Nations’ Food
and Agriculture Organization and is
incorporated by reference in § 300.5 of
this chapter. APHIS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register and
maintain on an APHIS Web site a list of
the specific areas that are approved as
areas in which Karnal bunt is not
known to occur in order to provide the
public with current, valid information.
Areas listed as being free from Karnal
bunt are subject to audit by APHIS to
verify that they continue to merit such
listing.
(c) Handling, inspection and
phytosanitary certificates. Unless
otherwise prohibited under § 319.59–3
of this subpart, any articles described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section that are
from a region listed in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section may be imported into the
United States subject to the following
conditions:
(1) The articles must be from an area
that has been recognized, in accordance
with paragraph (b)(2) of this section, to
be an area free of Karnal bunt, or the
articles have been tested and found to
be free of Karnal bunt;
(2) The articles have not been
commingled prior to arrival at a U.S.
port of entry with articles from areas
where Karnal bunt is known to occur;
(3) The articles offered for entry must
be made available to an inspector for
examination and remain at the port
until released, or authorized further
movement pending release, by an
inspector; and
(4) The articles must be accompanied
by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the national plant protection
organization of the region of origin that
includes the following additional
declaration: ‘‘These articles originated
in an area where Karnal bunt is not
known to occur, as attested to either by
survey results or by testing for bunted
kernels or spores.’’
(d) Treatments. (1) Prior to entry into
the United States, the following articles
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 33 / Friday, February 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
must be cleaned by removing any soil
and plant debris that may be present.
(i) All conveyances and mechanized
harvesting equipment used for storing
and handling wheat, durum wheat, or
triticale that tested positive for Karnal
bunt based on bunted kernels.
(ii) All grain storage and handling
equipment used to store or handle seed
that has tested spore positive or grain
that has tested bunted-kernel positive.
(iii) All seed-conditioning equipment
used to store or handle seed that has
tested spore-positive.
(2) Articles listed in paragraphs
(d)(1)(i) and (d)(1)(ii) of this section will
require disinfection in addition to
cleaning prior to entry into the United
States if an inspector or an official of the
plant protection organization of the
country of origin determines that
disinfection is necessary to prevent the
spread of Karnal bunt. Disinfection is
required for all seed conditioning
equipment covered under paragraph
(d)(1)(iii) prior to entry into the United
States.
(3) Items that require disinfection
prior to entry into the United States
must be disinfected by one of the
methods specified in paragraphs
(d)(3)(i) through (d)(3)(iii) of this
section, unless a particular treatment is
designated by an inspector or by an
official of the plant protection
organization of the country of origin:
(i) Wetting all surfaces to the point of
runoff with a 1.5 percent sodium
hypochlorite solution and letting stand
for 15 minutes, then thoroughly
washing down all surfaces after 15
minutes to minimize corrosion;
(ii) Applying steam to all surfaces
until the point of runoff, and so that a
temperature of 170 °F is reached at the
point of contact; or
(iii) Cleaning with a solution of hot
water and detergent, applied under
pressure of at least 30 pounds per
square inch, at a minimum temperature
of 170 °F.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0240.)
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of
February 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05–3141 Filed 2–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:38 Feb 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
7 CFR Parts 810
RIN 580–AA86
United States Standards for Wheat
AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Grain Inspection, Packers
and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA)
is revising the United States Standards
for Wheat. GIPSA is amending the grain
standards to change the definition of
contrasting classes in Hard Red Winter
wheat and Hard Red Spring wheat such
that Hard White wheat is not a
contrasting class but is considered as
wheat of other classes. GIPSA also is
amending the grain standards by adding
the sample size used to determine
sample grade factors, because the
standards should transmit this
information. These actions are necessary
to ensure market-relevant standards and
grades and facilitate the marketing of
grain.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick McCluskey at GIPSA, USDA,
STOP 3604, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
3604; Telephone (202) 720–4684; faxed
to (202) 720–7883.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Department of Agriculture is
issuing this rule in conformance with
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, instructs each executive agency
to adhere to certain requirements in the
development of new and revised
regulations in order to avoid unduly
burdening the court system. The final
rule was reviewed under this Executive
Order and no additional related
information has been obtained since
then. This final rule is not intended to
have a retroactive effect. The United
States Grain Standards Act provides in
Section 87g that no State or subdivision
may require or impose any requirements
or restrictions concerning the
inspection, weighing, or description of
grain under the Act. Otherwise, this
final rule will not preempt any State or
local laws, regulations, or policies,
unless they present any irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. There are no
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8233
administrative procedures which must
be exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this final
rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires agencies
to consider the economic impact of each
rule on small entities. GIPSA has
determined that this final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. Under the provisions of the United
States Grain Standards Act, grain
exported from the United States must be
officially inspected and weighed.
Mandatory inspection and weighing
services are provided by GIPSA at 33
export facilities. All of these facilities
are owned by multi-national
corporations, large cooperatives, or
public entities that do not meet the
requirements for small entities
established by the Small Business
Administration. GIPSA is amending the
grain standards to change the definition
of contrasting classes in Hard Red
Winter wheat and Hard Red Spring
wheat such that Hard White wheat is
not a contrasting class but is considered
as wheat of other classes. GIPSA also is
amending the grain standards by adding
the sample size used to determine
sample grade factors, because the
standards should transmit this
information. The two changes made to
the wheat standards in this final rule are
needed to ensure market-relevant
standards and grades. Further, the
regulations are applied equally to all
entities.
The U.S. wheat industry, including
producers (approximately 240,000),
handlers (approximately 6,800 domestic
elevators), traders (approximately 200
active wheat futures traders), processors
(approximately 184 flour mills),
merchandisers, and exporters, are the
primary users of the U.S. Standards for
Wheat and utilize the official standards
as a common trading language to market
wheat. We assume that some of the
entities may be small. Further, the
United States Grain Standards Act
(USGSA) (7 U.S.C. 87f–1) requires the
registration of all persons engaged in the
business of buying grain for sale in
foreign commerce. In addition, those
individuals who handle, weigh, or
transport grain for sale in foreign
commerce must also register. The
USGSA regulations (7 CFR 800.30)
define a foreign commerce grain
business as persons who regularly
engage in buying for sale, handling,
weighing, or transporting grain totaling
15,000 metric tons or more during the
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 33 (Friday, February 18, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8229-8233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3141]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 33 / Friday, February 18, 2005 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 8229]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. 02-057-2]
RIN 0579-AB74
Karnal Bunt; Revision of Regulations for Importing Wheat
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending our regulations regarding the importation of
wheat from regions affected with Karnal bunt. Our amendments, among
other things, list such regions, as well as articles regulated for
Karnal bunt; increase the flexibility of the regulations so that they
provide more readily for the recognition of areas where Karnal bunt is
not known to occur within regions where Karnal bunt is known to be
present; describe conditions, including requirements for phytosanitary
certificates, under which wheat and related articles from regions
affected with Karnal bunt are imported into the United States; and
specify cleaning and/or disinfection requirements for imported farm
machinery and other equipment used to handle or store Karnal bunt-
positive seed or host crops. The changes make our regulations regarding
the importation of wheat and related articles from regions affected
with Karnal bunt substantively equivalent to our domestic Karnal bunt
regulations and make the former consistent with international
agreements to which the United States is a party.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jeanne Van Dersal, Import
Specialist, Phytosanitary Issues Management Team, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road, Unit 140, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-6799.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum
wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale (Triticum aestivum x Secale
cereale), a hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is caused by the smut
fungus Tilletia indica (Mitra) Mundkur and is spread by spores,
primarily through the movement of infected seed. Our Karnal bunt-
related import regulations are contained in Subpart--Wheat Diseases (7
CFR 319.59 through 319.59-2).
On March 3, 2004, we published in the Federal Register (69 FR 9976-
9982, Docket No. 02-057-1) a proposal to amend the regulations by
listing regions affected with Karnal bunt, as well as articles that
would be regulated for Karnal bunt; increasing the flexibility of the
regulations so that they could provide more readily for the recognition
of areas where Karnal bunt is not known to occur within regions where
Karnal bunt is known to be present; describing conditions, including
requirements for phytosanitary certificates, under which wheat and
related articles from regions affected with Karnal bunt could be
imported into the United States; and specifying cleaning and/or
disinfection requirements for imported farm machinery and other
equipment used to handle or store Karnal bunt-positive seed or host
crops. The proposed changes would make our regulations regarding the
importation of wheat and related articles from regions affected with
Karnal bunt substantively equivalent to our domestic Karnal bunt
regulations and would make the former consistent with international
agreements to which the United States is a party.
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
May 3, 2004. We received two comments by that date, both from
representatives of domestic wheat industry groups. Both commenters were
in favor of the proposed rule.
However, one commenter offered suggestions for changes to the
background information contained in the preamble of the proposed rule.
These suggestions are discussed below.
The commenter noted that the proposed rule's economic analysis
mentioned, but did not identify, five durum-producing Mexican States in
addition to the States of Sonora and Baja California (i.e., the States
where the Mexicali Valley, a Karnal bunt-free area already recognized
in the regulations, is located). The commenter identified four of the
five Mexican States and offered relative per-State percentages for
durum production in Mexico and suggested that, due to transportation
costs and other considerations within Mexico, more wheat originating in
the Mexican State of Sonora may be exported to the United States than
had been explored in the economic analysis.
While increased Mexican wheat imports from Mexico may occur, as the
commenter suggests, our economic analysis concludes that the effects
are likely to be small relative to the value of the domestic industry.
The commenter did not provide evidence to the contrary. We are making
no changes in response to this comment.
With respect to the five durum-producing Mexican States mentioned
but not specifically identified in the proposed rule, we have updated
the economic analysis for this final rule to identify these five
States, which are Chihuahua, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michocan, and
Queretaro.
The commenter pointed out that Karnal bunt has been reported in
additional countries not mentioned in the background information in the
preamble of the proposed rule. These countries are Nepal, Iran, and
South Africa.
The countries we mentioned in the proposed rule are those countries
that have been listed in the wheat import regulations as countries
where Karnal bunt is known to exist. In this final rule, we have
updated the regulatory text of Sec. 319.59-4(b)(1) to include those
additional countries on that paragraph's list of countries where Karnal
bunt is known to occur.
In addition to that change, we are also amending the definition of
inspector in this final rule to reflect the reassignment of certain
responsibilities from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to
the Department of Homeland Security's Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection by the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
[[Page 8230]]
Other Changes
In addition to the changes discussed above, we have also made two
other changes in this final rule in order to ensure that the
regulations are internally consistent. First, in Sec. 319.59-4(a)(2)
of the proposed rule, we listed Triticum spp. (wheat) plants among the
articles designated as regulated articles for Karnal bunt, and in
paragraph (c) of that section we described the conditions under which
regulated articles could be imported from regions where Karnal bunt is
known to occur. However, under Sec. 319.59-2(a), the importation of
Triticum spp. plants into the United States from any country except
Canada is prohibited. In order to avoid any potential confusion between
the provisions in Sec. Sec. 319.59-2 and 319.59-4, we have removed
wheat plants from the list of regulated articles for Karnal bunt so it
does not appear that wheat plants could be imported into the United
States under the conditions described in Sec. 319.59-4(c).
The other change is similar in nature. Specifically, in Sec.
319.59-4(b)(1) we list regions where Karnal bunt is known to occur, and
paragraph (c) of that section describes the conditions under which
regulated articles, including articles of Triticum spp., could be
imported from those regions. However, several of the regions listed in
Sec. 319.59-4(b)(1) are also listed in Sec. 319.59-3(b) as regions
from which the importation of certain articles, including articles of
Triticum spp., is prohibited due to flag smut. In order to prevent a
conflict between those two sets of provisions, we have amended the
conditions for the importation of regulated articles from regions where
Karnal bunt exists (Sec. 319.59-4[c]) to provide that the regulated
articles will be eligible for importation only if they are not
otherwise prohibited under Sec. 319.59-3.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the
changes discussed in this document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
This rule amends the import regulations pertaining to Karnal bunt
to make them substantively equivalent to the domestic Karnal bunt
regulations and will help the United States meet its obligations under
international agreements to which it is a party.
For this rule, we have prepared an economic analysis. The economic
analysis provides a cost-benefit analysis as required by Executive
Order 12866, as well as an analysis of the potential economic effects
of this rule on small entities, as required under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The economic analysis is summarized below. Copies of
the full analysis are available by writing or calling the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
The economic analysis investigates the potential economic effects
in the United States that may result from the removal of Karnal bunt-
related restrictions on wheat imports. It is anticipated that any
additional wheat imports that do occur as a result of this rule would
be from Mexico. There are five Mexican States that appear to meet the
requirements in this rule for Karnal bunt-free status. These States are
Chihuahua, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michocan, and Queretaro. The Mexicali
Valley in Sonora \1\ and Baja California was declared Karnal bunt-free
in 1998 and is therefore not directly affected by this rule. Other
countries affected with Karnal bunt which may be eligible to export
wheat to the United States under the regulations may still be precluded
from doing so for a number of reasons, including the presence of other
wheat pests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Total Mexican wheat production and exports declined
considerably in 2002 and 2003 due to a severe water shortage for
crop irrigation in the principal wheat producing State of Sonora.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any new wheat imports into the United States from Mexico are likely
to be durum wheat. In Mexico, demand for durum wheat is limited because
the demand for pasta is limited. However, Mexican wheat producers favor
durum wheat due to its higher yield and disease resistance, creating a
small surplus of durum for export. Mexican wheat exports since 1995
have been almost exclusively durum wheat. Because Mexican wheat exports
have been so concentrated in durum wheat, it is expected that any
additional imports into the United States from any new Karnal bunt-free
areas in Mexico would also be durum wheat. For the period 1998-2001,
the annual average durum wheat production in the United States was
about 3 million metric tons (MT). Imports of durum wheat from all
sources averaged about 458,000 MT. Approximately 2 percent of those
imports were from the Karnal bunt-free area of Mexico.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Sources: Economic Research Service, USDA, Department of
Commerce (DOC), U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Statistics, and
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our economic analysis considers two scenarios for expanded U.S.
wheat imports from Mexico, assuming no displacement of other imports.
The first scenario analyzes the impact of additional Mexican durum
wheat exports to the United States of an amount equal to 1 percent of
total wheat production in the five additional Mexican States cited
previously (about 7,000 MT). This reflects the fact that about 1
percent of the wheat production in the Mexicali Valley, which is
already eligible to be shipped to the United States, is indeed exported
to the United States.\3\ The second scenario analyzes the impact of
additional Mexican durum wheat exports of an amount equal to 12 percent
of total wheat production in those five States (about 87,000 MT). For
the period 1998-2001, Mexican wheat exports to the world represented on
average approximately 11.6 percent of total Mexican wheat production
annually.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Mexico produced an average annual 3.2 million MT of wheat
for the period 1998-2001. Wheat grown in the Mexicali Valley in
Sonora and Baja California accounted for about 18.6 percent of that
total. Over the same time period, an average of 8,754 MT of durum
wheat was exported to the United States annually, presumably from
the Karnal bunt-free Mexicali Valley. Sources: DOC and FAO.
\4\ FAO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are reasons to believe that new imports would be limited and
that the first scenario more closely approximates the amount of Mexican
wheat that may eventually enter the U.S. market. Under this scenario,
the new imports are estimated to be an addition of 7,280 MT, which
approximates the 1 percent share of Mexican wheat production in the
Mexicali Valley that was exported to the United States between 1998 and
2001. The Mexicali Valley is one of Mexico's largest wheat producing
areas. It is also closer to the United States than the Mexican
population centers in central and southern Mexico. Transportation costs
to the Mexican population centers from this area are high because rail
lines must traverse mountains. Despite the fact that the U.S. market
has been open to imports of wheat from this area since 1998, Mexican
wheat exports directed to the United States between 1998 and 2001 have
averaged less than 5 percent of all Mexican wheat exports.
Another reason to believe that the quantity of new wheat imports
from Mexico that may occur as a result of this rule would be small is
due to the fact that the five additional Mexican States identified
previously are producing less than 25 percent of all Mexican wheat, and
little durum wheat. At present,
[[Page 8231]]
durum wheat production in Mexico is concentrated in the northwestern
portion of the country. It has been estimated that 75 percent of
Mexican durum wheat production occurs in Sonora, 13 percent in Baja
California, and 5 percent in Sinoloa.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ U.S. Wheat Associates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, Mexico's population consumes far more wheat than the
country produces, as is evident in its status as a net importer. The
Mexican population is concentrated in the central and southern part of
the country. With the exception of Chihuahua, the five Mexican States
considered in the analysis are in the central part of Mexico. The
transportation of wheat from these States to the United States would be
more difficult and more costly than to closer Mexican population
centers. This makes it likely that the shift to production for export
in the five States will be limited.
The entry of additional durum wheat from Mexico into U.S. markets
would induce producer losses for U.S. producers of durum wheat and
consumer gains. Under the most likely scenario of new wheat imports of
7,280 MT, and assuming a demand elasticity of -0.35 and a supply
elasticity of 0.34, prices of durum wheat could potentially decrease by
about 0.3 percent. Producers would potentially lose about $1.122
million while consumers potentially gain $1.123 million. The net
benefit in this scenario would be about $1,000. Under the less likely
scenario of a new import quantity of approximately 87,000 MT, durum
wheat prices could decline by 4 percent. Consumer gains of $13.539
million would offset producer losses of $13.353 million, resulting in a
net benefit of $186,000. In both cases, consumer benefits would be
slightly higher than producer losses, which would lead to a net
positive impact on the overall economy. To put the producer surplus
reductions in perspective, the average annual value of durum wheat
production in the United States for 1998-2001 was $326.3 million. Thus,
while the additional imports from Mexico would affect domestic
producers of durum wheat, those effects are expected to be small
relative to the value of the industry. It should also be noted that the
actual loss to domestic producers is likely to be smaller than the
magnitudes estimated, as the analysis does not consider the
displacement of other imports.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established guidelines
for determining which establishments are to be considered small under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. According to the standard established
by the SBA for agricultural producers, a producer with less than $0.75
million in annual sales is considered a small entity. Of the 241,334
U.S. wheat farms in 1997, at least 92 percent were considered small.\6\
The number of durum wheat producers is not known. It is likely that
durum wheat producers affected by the rule would be considered small
entities. However, as was discussed above, increased Mexican wheat
imports from Mexico would likely have a small adverse impact on
domestic producers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 1997 Census of Agriculture, USDA-NASS. Breakdown shows 2.4
percent of wheat farms with sales in excess of $1 million, and 5.2
percent with sales between $0.5 and $0.999 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws
and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements
included in this rule have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0579-0240.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), which
requires Government agencies in general to provide the public the
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically
to the maximum extent possible. For information pertinent to GPEA
compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles,
APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Honey, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450 and 7701-7772; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. Subpart--Wheat Diseases, Sec. Sec. 319.59 through 319.59-2, is
revised to read as follows:
Subpart--Wheat Diseases
Sec.
319.59-1 Definitions.
319.59-2 General import prohibitions; exceptions.
319.59-3 Flag smut.
319.59-4 Karnal bunt.
Sec. 319.59-1 Definitions.
Administrator. The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, or any
employee of the United States Department of Agriculture delegated to
act in his or her stead.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). The Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Foreign strains of flag smut. Plant diseases caused by foreign
strains of highly infective fungi, Urocystis agropyri (Preuss)
Schroet., which attack wheat and substantially reduce its yield, and
which are new to, or not widely prevalent or distributed within and
throughout, the United States.
From. An article is considered to be ``from'' any country or
locality in which it was grown.
Grain. Wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum), and
triticale (Triticum aestivum X Secale cereale) used for consumption or
processing.
Hay. Host crops cut and dried for feeding to livestock. Hay cut
after reaching the dough stage may contain mature kernels of the host
crop.
Host crops. Plants or plant parts, including grain, seed, or hay,
of wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum), and
triticale (Triticum aestivum X Secale cereale).
Inspector. Any individual authorized by the Administrator of APHIS
or the Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security, to enforce the regulations in this
subpart.
Karnal bunt. A plant disease caused by the fungus Tilletia indica
(Mitra) Mundkur.
Plant. Any plant (including any plant part) for or capable of
propagation,
[[Page 8232]]
including a tree, a tissue culture, a plantlet culture, pollen, a
shrub, a vine, a cutting, a graft, a scion, a bud, a bulb, a root, and
a seed.
Seed. Wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum), and
triticale (Triticum aestivum x Secale cereale) used for propagation.
Spp. (species). All species, clones, cultivars, strains, varieties,
and hybrids, of a genus.
Straw. The vegetative material left after the harvest of host
crops. Straw is generally used as animal feed or bedding, as mulch, or
for erosion control.
United States. The States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia,
Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, or any other territory
or possession of the United States.
Sec. 319.59-2 General import prohibitions; exceptions.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section,
importation of Triticum spp. plants into the United States from any
country except Canada is prohibited. This prohibition does not include
seed.
(b) Triticum spp. plants, articles prohibited because of flag smut
in Sec. 319.59-3(a), and articles regulated for Karnal bunt in Sec.
319.59-4(a) may be imported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture for
experimental or scientific purposes if:
(1) Imported at the Plant Germplasm Quarantine Center, Building
320, Beltsville Agricultural Center East, Beltsville, MD 20705, or at
any port of entry with an asterisk listed in Sec. 319.37-14(b) of this
part;
(2) Imported pursuant to a departmental permit issued for such
article and kept on file at the Plant Germplasm Quarantine Center;
(3) Imported under conditions of treatment, processing, growing,
shipment, or disposal specified on the departmental permit and found by
the Administrator to be adequate to prevent the introduction into the
United States of tree, plant, or fruit diseases (including foreign
strains of flag smut), injurious insects, and other plant pests, and
(4) Imported with a departmental tag or label securely attached to
the outside of the container containing the article or securely
attached to the article itself if not in a container, and with such tag
or label bearing a departmental permit number corresponding to the
number of the departmental permit issued for such article.
Sec. 319.59-3 Flag smut.
The articles listed in paragraph (a) of this section from the
regions listed in paragraph (b) of this section are prohibited articles
because of foreign strains of flag smut and are prohibited from being
imported or offered for entry into the United States except as provided
in Sec. 319.59-2(b).
(a) The following articles of Triticum spp. (wheat) or of Aegilops
spp. (barb goatgrass, goatgrass):
(1) Seeds, plants, and straw (other than straw, with or without
heads, which has been processed or manufactured for use indoors, such
as for decorative purposes or for use in toys); chaff; and products of
the milling process (i.e., bran, shorts, thistle sharps, and pollards)
other than flour; and
(2) Seeds of Melilotus indica (annual yellow sweetclover) and seeds
of any other field crops that have been separated from wheat during the
screening process.
(b) Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan,
Bangladesh, Belarus, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Cyprus, Egypt, Estonia,
Falkland Islands, Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, India, Iran,
Iraq, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Libya,
Lithuania, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan,
Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Tunisia,
Turkey, Turkmenistan, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, Uzbekistan,
and Venezuela.
Sec. 319.59-4 Karnal bunt.
(a) Regulated articles. The following are regulated articles for
Karnal bunt:
(1) Conveyances, including trucks, railroad cars, and other
containers used to move host crops from a region listed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section that test positive for Karnal bunt through the
presence of bunted kernels;
(2) Plant parts, including grain, seed, straw, or hay, of all
varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum),
and triticale (Triticum aestivum x Secale cereale) from a region listed
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, except for straw/stalks/seed heads
for decorative purposes that have been processed or manufactured prior
to movement and are intended for use indoors;
(3) Tilletia indica (Mitra) Mundkur;
(4) Mechanized harvesting equipment that has been used in the
production of wheat, durum wheat, or triticale that has tested positive
for Karnal bunt through the presence of bunted kernels; and
(5) Seed conditioning equipment and storage/handling equipment that
has been used in the production of wheat, durum wheat, or triticale
seed found to contain the spores of Tilletia indica.
(b)(1) Karnal bunt is known to occur in the following regions:
Afghanistan, India, Iran, Iraq, Mexico, Nepal, Pakistan, and South
Africa.
(2) The Administrator may recognize an area within a region listed
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section as an area free of Karnal bunt
whenever he or she determines that the area meets the requirements of
the International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) No. 4,
``Requirements for the establishment of pest free areas.'' The
international standard was established by the International Plant
Protection Convention of the United Nations' Food and Agriculture
Organization and is incorporated by reference in Sec. 300.5 of this
chapter. APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register and
maintain on an APHIS Web site a list of the specific areas that are
approved as areas in which Karnal bunt is not known to occur in order
to provide the public with current, valid information. Areas listed as
being free from Karnal bunt are subject to audit by APHIS to verify
that they continue to merit such listing.
(c) Handling, inspection and phytosanitary certificates. Unless
otherwise prohibited under Sec. 319.59-3 of this subpart, any articles
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section that are from a region
listed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be imported into the
United States subject to the following conditions:
(1) The articles must be from an area that has been recognized, in
accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section, to be an area free of
Karnal bunt, or the articles have been tested and found to be free of
Karnal bunt;
(2) The articles have not been commingled prior to arrival at a
U.S. port of entry with articles from areas where Karnal bunt is known
to occur;
(3) The articles offered for entry must be made available to an
inspector for examination and remain at the port until released, or
authorized further movement pending release, by an inspector; and
(4) The articles must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate
issued by the national plant protection organization of the region of
origin that includes the following additional declaration: ``These
articles originated in an area where Karnal bunt is not known to occur,
as attested to either by survey results or by testing for bunted
kernels or spores.''
(d) Treatments. (1) Prior to entry into the United States, the
following articles
[[Page 8233]]
must be cleaned by removing any soil and plant debris that may be
present.
(i) All conveyances and mechanized harvesting equipment used for
storing and handling wheat, durum wheat, or triticale that tested
positive for Karnal bunt based on bunted kernels.
(ii) All grain storage and handling equipment used to store or
handle seed that has tested spore positive or grain that has tested
bunted-kernel positive.
(iii) All seed-conditioning equipment used to store or handle seed
that has tested spore-positive.
(2) Articles listed in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (d)(1)(ii) of this
section will require disinfection in addition to cleaning prior to
entry into the United States if an inspector or an official of the
plant protection organization of the country of origin determines that
disinfection is necessary to prevent the spread of Karnal bunt.
Disinfection is required for all seed conditioning equipment covered
under paragraph (d)(1)(iii) prior to entry into the United States.
(3) Items that require disinfection prior to entry into the United
States must be disinfected by one of the methods specified in
paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (d)(3)(iii) of this section, unless a
particular treatment is designated by an inspector or by an official of
the plant protection organization of the country of origin:
(i) Wetting all surfaces to the point of runoff with a 1.5 percent
sodium hypochlorite solution and letting stand for 15 minutes, then
thoroughly washing down all surfaces after 15 minutes to minimize
corrosion;
(ii) Applying steam to all surfaces until the point of runoff, and
so that a temperature of 170 [deg]F is reached at the point of contact;
or
(iii) Cleaning with a solution of hot water and detergent, applied
under pressure of at least 30 pounds per square inch, at a minimum
temperature of 170 [deg]F.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0240.)
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of February 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05-3141 Filed 2-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P