Current through Register Vol. 54, No. 44, November 2, 2024
(a)
The governing body of the county shall establish a court facility for each
magisterial district judge whose magisterial district is situated in the county
at such locations within the county as may be approved by the president
judge.
(b) The governing body
shall, insofar as possible, ensure that each facility meets all the following
minimum standards:
(1) The facility shall be
located in a place that is convenient to the public and allows the business of
the court to be conducted with dignity, decorum, safety, and
dispatch.
(2) Such facility shall
not be located in or appurtenant to the residence or place of business of the
magisterial district judge. It shall have a courtroom and such other rooms as
may be necessary and shall be provided with necessary furniture and
equipment.
(3) A magisterial
district judge shall be provided with such staff, forms, supplies, and
equipment as shall be necessary for the proper performance of the judge's
duties. To maintain the dignity of the office, the judge shall be provided with
judicial robes.
(c) The
court facility of a magisterial district judge may, with the approval of the
Supreme Court, be located outside of the boundaries of the magisterial district
from which the judge is elected, upon petition of the president judge of the
judicial district, subject to the following provisions:
(1)
Notice. Each of the
following provisions relating to notice shall apply:
(i) Written notice of the proposed relocation
shall be provided to all magisterial district judges in the county, the local
bar association, and to each municipality and police department in each of the
affected districts.
(ii) Notice of
the proposal shall be provided to the public by posting the proposal on the
court or county official website and by any additional means that the president
judge deems appropriate. The notice must be placed at least 30 days before the
submission of the petition and must invite members of the public to provide
written comment on the proposal.
(iii) If the relocation is to a facility to
be occupied by more than one magisterial district judge, the magisterial
district judge from any of the districts to be combined shall provide a written
statement whether the judge supports or opposes the relocation within 30 days
of the distribution of the written notice in subdivision (c)(1)(i).
(2)
Petition.
Petitions for approval of a relocation of a magisterial district judge's court
facility outside of the magisterial district from which the judge has been
elected shall be submitted to the Court Administrator, with a copy sent to all
affected magisterial district judges, and to any municipality contained in the
affected magisterial district. The petition shall contain all the following:
(i) A certification that the proposed
location is more suitable or affordable than the facilities that are available
within the magisterial district from which any relocated judge is
elected.
(ii) An assessment of the
impact of the relocation on public convenience and access to the
court.
(iii) An assessment of the
impact of the relocation on court security.
(iv) An estimate of the fiscal impact of the
relocation.
(v) If the relocation
combines more than one magisterial district judge in a single facility, the
proposed floor plan of the combined court facilities.
(vi) A copy of the statements of all affected
magisterial district judges as to their position regarding the relocation or a
notation that any magisterial district judge declined to provide such a
statement.
(vii) A copy of the
public notice that was posted regarding the proposal and copies of any comments
received.
(3)
Standards. The following standards are intended to guide
president judges as to factors that the Supreme Court may consider in
disposition of the petition:
(i) Relocation of
the court facility would not cause inconvenience or confusion to the public or
to law enforcement.
(ii) The
district into which any judge's facility is relocated is adjacent to the
district from which that judge is elected.
(iii) If the relocation combines more than
one magisterial district judge in a single facility, adequate facilities and
staff shall be provided for each judge to enable them to perform the business
of each court and ensure that proper fiscal controls are in place.
(iv) No more than three judges shall be
located in the same consolidated court facility.
(v) The president judge certifies that the
proposed location is more suitable or affordable than the facilities that are
available within the magisterial district from which the judge is
elected.
(4)
Statements in Opposition. Statements in opposition to the
petition may be submitted to the Court Administrator by any interested party
within 30 days of the submission of the original petition. Any statement should
contain a concise statement of reasons why the petition should be denied and
should reference the standards listed in subdivision (c)(3). A copy of any
statement shall be sent to the president judge.
(5)
Review. The Court
Administrator shall review the petition to determine if it complies with the
provisions of this rule. A petition that complies with the rule will be
forwarded to the Supreme Court for consideration, along with any statements of
opposition submitted and a recommendation from the Court
Administrator.
(6)
Implementation. Following the approval of a petition, the
president judge shall consult with all affected magisterial district judges to
ensure that the changes are implemented without undue disruption to the
business of the courts.