(a) To determine whether an insurer is
impaired or in imminent danger of becoming impaired, the director may consider
one or more of the following:
(1) findings in
financial condition and market conduct examination reports prepared by the
division or another licensing jurisdiction, audit reports, and actuarial
opinions, reports, or summaries;
(2) National Association of Insurance
Commissioners' Insurance Regulatory Information System reports or other
financial analysis reports;
(3)
whether the insurer has made adequate provision, according to accepted
actuarial standards of practice, for the anticipated cash flows required by the
contractual obligations and related expenses of the insurer, when considered in
light of the assets held by the insurer for reserves and related actuarial
items including the investment earnings on those assets and the considerations
anticipated to be received and retained under the contracts;
(4) the financial condition and ability of an
assuming reinsurer to perform and, after taking into account the insurer's cash
flow and the classes of business written, whether the insurer's reinsurance
program provides sufficient protection for the insurer's remaining
surplus;
(5) whether the insurer's
operating results in the last 12 months or a shorter period of time, including
any net capital gain or loss, a change in nonadmitted assets, and cash
dividends paid to shareholders, would reduce by more than 50 percent the
insurer's remaining policyholder surplus held in excess of the minimum
policyholder surplus required under AS 21;
(6) whether the insurer's operating loss in
the last 12 months or a shorter period of time, excluding net capital gains, is
greater than 20 percent of the insurer's remaining policyholder surplus held in
excess of the minimum policyholder surplus required under AS 21;
(7) whether a reinsurer, obligor, or any
entity within the insurer's insurance holding company system, is insolvent,
threatened with insolvency, or delinquent in payment of a monetary obligation,
any of which in the opinion of the director may affect the solvency of the
insurer;
(8) contingent
liabilities, pledges, or guaranties that, individually or collectively, involve
a total amount that the director determines may affect the solvency of the
insurer;
(9) whether a controlling
person of an insurer is delinquent in the transmission or payment of net
premiums to the insurer;
(10) the
age and collectability of receivables;
(11) whether the management of an insurer or
any other person who directly or indirectly controls the operation of the
insurer fails to possess and demonstrate the competence, fitness, and
reputation considered necessary to serve the insurer in the position
held;
(12) whether the management
of an insurer fails to respond to an inquiry of the director relative to the
condition of the insurer or gives the director false or misleading information
concerning an inquiry;
(13) whether
the insurer has failed to meet financial and holding company filing
requirements in the absence of a reason satisfactory to the director;
(14) whether the management of an insurer
files a false or misleading financial statement, releases a false or misleading
financial statement to a lending institution or the public, makes a false or
misleading entry, or omits an entry in the books of the insurer in a material
amount or an amount that would place the insurer in a condition that might
constitute impairment as defined in
AS
21.97.900;
(15) whether the insurer has grown so rapidly
and to such an extent that it lacks adequate financial and administrative
capacity to meet its obligations in a timely manner;
(16) whether the insurer has experienced, or
will experience in the next 60 months, negative cash flow or liquidity
problems;
(17) whether management
has established reserves that do not comply with minimum standards established
by state insurance laws, regulations, statutory accounting standards, sound
actuarial principles, and standards of practice;
(18) whether management persistently engages
in material under reserving that results in adverse development;
(19) whether transactions among affiliates,
subsidiaries, or controlling persons for which the insurer receives assets,
capital gains, or both do not provide sufficient value, liquidity, or diversity
to assure the insurer's ability to meet its outstanding obligations as they
mature;
(20) any other condition
that might constitute impairment as defined in
AS
21.97.900.
(b) In determining an insurer's financial
condition under
3
AAC 21.500 -
3
AAC 21.520, the director may take one or more of the
following actions:
(1) disregard a credit or
account receivable resulting from a transaction with a reinsurer that is
insolvent, impaired, or otherwise subject to a delinquency
proceeding;
(2) make appropriate
adjustments, including disallowance, to asset values attributable to
investments in or transactions with a parent, subsidiary, or affiliate that
violates a provision of AS 21 or 3 AAC 21 - 3 AAC 31;
(3) refuse to recognize the stated value of
an account receivable if the ability to collect the account receivable is
highly speculative in view of the age of the account or the financial condition
of the debtor;
(4) increase the
insurer's liability in an amount equal to a contingent liability, a pledge, or
a guarantee not otherwise included if a substantial risk exists that the
insurer will be called upon to meet that obligation within the next 12
months;
(5) take whatever other
action is necessary to accurately determine an insurer's actual financial
condition.
In 2010 the revisor of statutes, acting under
AS
01.05.031, renumbered former
AS
21.90.900 as
AS
21.97.900. As of Register 196 (January 2011),
the regulations attorney made conforming technical revisions under
AS
44.62.125(b)(6), to 3 AAC
21.510(a), so that cross-references to former
AS
21.90.900 now refer to the renumbered
statute, AS
21.97.900.