International Trade Commission – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on tissue paper from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.

Notice is hereby given that on September 10, 2021, the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public only.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (the ``Commission'') has determined to institute a rescission proceeding and rescind the remedial orders issued in the underlying investigation. This rescission proceeding is hereby terminated.

The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene retail carrier bags from China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam and the countervailing duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags from Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (``Commission'') has determined to review in part certain findings in a final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') and to solicit briefing on the issues under review, as well as remedy, bonding, and the public interest.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 9, 2021, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Motorola Solutions, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois; Avigilon Corporation of Canada; Avigilon Fortress Corporation of Canada; Avigilon Patent Holding 1 Corporation of Canada; and Avigilon Technologies Corporation of Canada. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain video security equipment and systems, related software, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,868,912 (``the '912 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 10,726,312 (``the '312 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,508,607 (``the '607 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review a final initial determination (``ID'') with respect to whether the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement was satisfied, and on review, has determined to take no position on the issue. The Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID, and thereby finds no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation is terminated.

The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-662 and 731-TA-1554 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of pentafluoroethane (R-125) from China, provided for in subheadings 2903.39.20 and 2903.39.29 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce (``Commerce'') to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 9, 2021, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Copan Italia S.p.A. of Brescia, Italy and Copan Industries, Inc. of Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. Supplements to the Complaint were filed on August 16, 2021, August 19, 2021, and August 20, 2021. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain flocked swabs, products containing flocked swabs, and methods of using same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,011,358 (``the '358 Patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,173,779 (``the '779 Patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 10,327,741 (``the '741 Patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 28, 2021, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Causam Enterprises, Inc. of Raleigh, North Carolina. A supplement to the complaint was filed on August 16, 2021. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain smart thermostats, load control switches, and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,805,552 (``the '5,552 patent''), U.S. Patent No. 9,678,522 (``the '8,522 patent''), U.S. Patent No. 10,394,268 (``the '268 patent''), and U.S. Patent No. 10,396,592 (``the '592 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act''), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on imports of hot-rolled steel flat products (``hot-rolled steel'') from Brazil and Korea and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on hot- rolled steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to institute a rescission proceeding and rescind the remedial orders issued in the underlying investigation. The rescission proceeding is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 14) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ''), granting leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add as respondents Amerisweet Co., Ltd.; Batory Foods; DMH Ingredients Inc.; Fortway Chemicals Co.; Ingredient Supply Corporation; Nutravative Ingredients; Nutrisprinter Limited; Polestar Development Limited; Qingdao Samin Chemical Co.; Rochem International Inc.; and V-Chem Trading Ltd. (collectively, the ``Proposed Respondents'').

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 11) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ''). The ID grants an unopposed motion for termination of the investigation based on the withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that on August 17, 2021, the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public only.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the Administrative Law Judge's (``ALJ'') final initial determination (``ID''), issued on June 8, 2021, finding a violation of section 337 in the above-referenced investigation as to two of the four asserted patents. The Commission requests briefing from the parties on certain issues under review, as indicated in this notice.

Notice is hereby given that, on August 13, 2021, the presiding chief administrative law judge (``CALJ'') issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The CALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public only.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 30, 2021, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Masimo Corporation of Irvine, California and Cercacor Laboratories, Inc. of Irvine, California. An amended complaint was filed on July 12, 2021. A supplement was filed on July 19, 2021. The complaint, as amended, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain light-based physiological measurement devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,912,501 (``the '501 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 10,912,502 (``the '502 patent''); U.S. Patent 10,945,648 (``the '648 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 10,687,745 (``the '745 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,761,127 (``the '127 patent''). The amended complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists and/or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.

Following receipt of petitions on August 2, 2021 and August 4, 2021, requesting extension of the relief action currently in place on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic (``CSPV'') cells (whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products), the Commission instituted investigation No. TA-201-075 (Extension) under the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act''). The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether the action taken by the President under section 203 of the Act with respect to certain CSPV cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products (including, but not limited to, modules, laminates, panels, and building-integrated materials) (``CSPV products''), described in Proclamation 9693 of January 23, 2018, as modified by Proclamation 10101 of October 10, 2020, continues to be necessary to prevent or remedy serious injury and whether there is evidence that the domestic industry is making a positive adjustment to import competition.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (``the Commission'') has determined to adopt a recommended determination (``RD'') of the presiding chief administrative law judge (``CALJ'') finding that redesigned products of respondent Koki Holdings America Ltd. (``Koki'') of Braselton, Georgia are not covered by the limited exclusion order (``LEO'') and cease and desist order (``CDO'') issued in the underlying investigation. The Commission has terminated the modification proceeding.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in this investigation and has issued a general exclusion order prohibiting the importation of infringing high-density fiber optic equipment and components thereof and cease and desist orders directed against Respondents Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. (``Leviton''), Panduit Corporation (``Panduit''), and FS.com Inc. (``FS'').

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 23) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ''), terminating the investigation in its entirety based on settlement. This investigation is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Laptops, Desktops, Servers, Mobile Phones, Tablets, and Components Thereof, DN 3562; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.