International Trade Commission September 3, 2013 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on electrolytic manganese dioxide from Australia and China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission; \1\ to be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is October 3, 2013. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by November 18, 2013. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 25, 2013, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of The Clorox Company. A supplement to the complaint was filed on August 15, 2013. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain laundry and household cleaning products and packaging thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 251,292 (``the '292 trademark''); 290,449 (``the '449 trademark''); 1,391,304 (``the '304 trademark''); 1,877,353 (``the '353 trademark''); 2,072,730 (``the '730 trademark''); 2,290,310 (``the '310 trademark''); 2,358,705 (``the '705 trademark''); 2,531,814 (``the '814 trademark''); 2,692,790 (``the '790 trademark''); 3,949,040 (``the '040 trademark''); 2,798,766 (``the '766 trademark''); and 1,771,020 (``the '020 trademark''), and that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint further alleges violations of section 337 based upon trademark dilution, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.