Special Conditions; Sagem Avionics Inc.; Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) Installation in Cessna C-180; Protection of Systems From High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
These special conditions are issued to Sagem Avionics, Inc., 16923 Meridian East, Puyallup, WA 98375, for a Supplemental Type Certificate for the Cessna C-180 airplane. This airplane will have novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. This novel and unusual design feature will include the installation of a two panel electronic display system, or Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), manufactured by Sagem. The installation also includes components associated with this display system. The applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these airplanes.
Proposed Revision of Class E Airspace; Barter Island, AK
This action proposes to revise Class E airspace at Barter Island, AK. Two new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) are being developed and one SIAP is being amended for the Barter Island Airport. Adoption of this proposal would result in amending Class E airspace upward from 700 feet (ft.) and 1,200 ft. above the surface at Barter Island, AK.
Airworthiness Directives; Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model GA8 Airplanes
We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an airworthiness authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address an unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
Modification of Class E Airspace; Mason City, IA
This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Mason City, IA.
Approval of Noise Compatibility Program for Scottsdale Airport, Scottsdale, AZ
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its findings on the noise compatibility program submitted by the City of Scottsdale, Arizona under the provisions of Title I of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act, as amended, (Public Law 96-193) (hereinafter referred to as ``the Act'') and 14 CFR part 150. These findings are made in recognition of the description of Federal and nonfederal responsibilities in Senate Report No. 96-52 (1980). On January 21, 2005, the FAA determined that the noise exposure maps submitted by the City of Scottsdale under Part 150 were in compliance with applicable requirements.
Revision of Class E Airspace; Huslia, AK
This action revises Class E airspace at Huslia, AK to provide adequate controlled airspace to contain aircraft executing one new and two amended Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs). This rule results in revised Class E airspace revised upward from 700 feet (ft.) and 1,200 ft. above the surface at Huslia, AK.
Revision of Class E Airspace; Togiak Village, AK
This action corrects an error in the airspace description contained in a Final Rule that was published in the Federal Register on Monday, April 24, 2006 (71 FR 20871). Airspace Docket No. 06-AAL-06.
Modification of Legal Description of Class D and E Airspace; Fairbanks, Fort Wainwright Army Airfield, AK
The U.S. Army will soon be changing the name of Fort (Ft.) Wainwright Army Airfield (AAF) to Ladd AAF. This action amends the airport name accordingly for each of the Class D and Class E airspace descriptions in FAA Order 7400.9N.
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A321 Airplanes
We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an airworthiness authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.