Environmental Protection Agency August 3, 2016 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 4 of 4
National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review; Clarification
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to amend the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, we are clarifying the compliance date for the handling and storage of waste as a direct final rule without a prior proposed rule. If we receive no significant and relevant adverse comment, we will not take further action on this proposed rule.
National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review; Clarification
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to amend the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities. In this action, we are clarifying the compliance date for the handling and storage of waste.
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petitions for Objection to State Operating Permits for ABC Coke and Walter Coke (Jefferson County, Alabama)
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an Order, dated July 15, 2016, denying petitions to object to Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permits issued by the Jefferson County Department of Health (JCDH) to ABC Coke for its facility located in Tarrant and Walter Coke for its facility located in North Birmingham, both in Jefferson County, Alabama. This Order constitutes a final action on the petitions submitted by Gasp (Petitioner) and received by EPA on October 3, 2014, and December 2, 2014, respectively.
Amendments to Regional Consistency Regulations
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is promulgating revisions to its Regional Consistency regulations to more clearly address the implications of adverse federal court decisions that result from challenges to locally or regionally applicable actions. Specifically, the EPA is introducing a narrow procedural exception under which an EPA Regional office no longer needs to seek Headquarters concurrence to diverge from national policy in geographic areas covered by such an adverse court decision. The revisions will help to foster overall fairness and predictability regarding the scope and impact of judicial decisions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
