National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review; Clarification, 51114-51116 [2016-18395]
Download as PDF
51114
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
under paragraphs (a) of this section to
address the inconsistent application of
any rule, regulation, or policy that may
arise in response to the limited
jurisdiction of either a federal circuit
court decision arising from challenges to
‘‘locally or regionally applicable’’
actions, as provided in Clean Air Act
section 307(b) (42 U.S.C. 7607(b)), or a
federal district court decision.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 56.5 is amended by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 56.5 Mechanisms for fairness and
uniformity—Responsibilities of Regional
Office employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A responsible official in a Regional
office shall seek concurrence from the
appropriate EPA Headquarters office on
any interpretation of the Act, or rule,
regulation, or program directive when
such interpretation may result in
application of the act or rule, regulation,
or program directive that is inconsistent
with Agency policy. However, the
responsible official in a Regional office
will not be required to seek such
concurrence from the appropriate EPA
Headquarters office for actions that may
result in inconsistent application if such
inconsistent application is required in
order to act in accordance with a federal
court decision:
(1) Issued by a Circuit Court in
challenges to ‘‘locally or regionally
applicable’’ actions, as provided in
Clean Air Act section 307(b) (42 U.S.C.
7607(b)), if that circuit court has direct
jurisdiction over the geographic areas
that the Regional office official is
addressing, or (2) Issued by a district
court in a specific case if the party the
Regional office official is addressing was
also a party in the case that resulted in
the decision.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–17899 Filed 8–2–16; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0830; FRL–9950–10–
OAR]
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 2060–AS99
National Emission Standards for
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities Risk and Technology Review;
Clarification
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to amend the National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for Aerospace Manufacturing
and Rework Facilities. In this action, we
are clarifying the compliance date for
the handling and storage of waste.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
3, 2016 without further notice, unless
the EPA receives significant and
relevant adverse comment by September
2, 2016. If the EPA receives significant
and relevant adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2014–0830, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket. The EPA has established a
docket for this rulemaking under Docket
ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0830. All
documents in this docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov, or in hard
copy at the EPA Docket Center, EPA
WJC West Building, Room Number
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Room hours of operation are 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time,
Monday through Friday. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Air Docket is (202) 566–
1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this direct final action,
contact Ms. Kim Teal, Sector Policies
and Programs Division (D243–04),
Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone
number: (919) 541–5580; fax number:
(919) 541–5450; and email address:
teal.kim@epa.gov. For information about
the applicability of the NESHAP to a
particular entity, contact Mr. John Cox,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Assurance, (202) 564–1395, cox.john@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background information. On
December 7, 2015 (80 FR 76152), the
EPA finalized amendments to the
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities NESHAP based on our Risk
and Technology Review. In this action,
we are clarifying the intended
compliance date for sources subject to
the recently finalized handling and
storage of waste requirements.
Organization of this document. The
information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this action apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments in this direct
final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final
rule?
The EPA is publishing this rule
without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipate no significant and
relevant adverse comment.
In the final rule published December
7, 2015, we inadvertently failed to
identify the compliance date for sources
subject to the requirements for handling
and storage of waste. Therefore, in this
document we are correcting that
oversight. In the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of this Federal Register, we are
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposed rule to amend
the National Emission Standards for
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities (40 CFR part 63, subpart GG).
If significant and relevant adverse
comments are received on the proposal,
we will withdraw this direct final rule.
However, we will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information about commenting on this
rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this
document.
If the EPA receives significant and
relevant adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that some or all of the amendments in
this direct final rule will not take effect.
We would address all public comments
in any subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule.
B. Does this action apply to me?
Regulated entities. Categories and
entities potentially regulated by this
action are shown in Table 1 of this
preamble.
TABLE 1—INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CATEGORIES AFFECTED BY THIS ACTION
NAICS 1
Code
NESHAP
Aerospace
Manufacturing and
Rework Facilities.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Source
category
Aerospace Manufacturing and
Rework Facilities.
1North
System.
American
Industry
336411
336412
336413
336414
336415
336419
481111
481112
481211
481212
481219
Classification
Table 1 of this preamble is not
intended to be exhaustive, but rather to
provide a guide for readers regarding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
entities likely to be affected by the final
action for the source categories listed.
To determine whether your facility is
affected, you should examine the
applicability criteria in the appropriate
NESHAP. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of any aspect
of this NESHAP, please contact the
appropriate person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble.
C. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to the EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver
information identified as CBI only to the
following address: OAQPS Document
Control Officer (C404–02), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711, and Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0830.
II. What are the amendments in this
direct final rule?
This direct final rule provides a
compliance date of December 7, 2018,
for sources subject to the requirements
for handling and storage of waste in 40
CFR part 63, subpart GG. In the final
rule dated December 7, 2015, we
regulated specialty coating application
operations for the first time. The
compliance date for these new
requirements was December 7, 2018. We
also revised and clarified requirements
for handling and storage of waste, and
our intent was to specify the same
December 7, 2018, compliance date for
these revised requirements (80 FR
76172–74). However, we neglected to
specify a compliance date for these
revised waste handling and storage
requirements in the regulatory text.
Reading the regulatory text as now
written would imply that the
compliance date for these revised waste
handling and storage requirements
would be September 1, 1998. Therefore,
we are correcting the rule text at 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51115
63.749(a)(3) to make it clear that the
December 7, 2018, compliance date also
applies to sources subject to the waste
storage and handling requirements.
The EPA is accepting comments only
on the specific issue raised in this direct
final action and the accompanying
proposed rule, the compliance date for
handling and storage of waste. The EPA
is not reopening or accepting comment
on any other aspect of the NESHAP for
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA. OMB has previously approved the
information collection activities
contained in the existing regulations
and has assigned OMB Control Number
2060–0314. This action does not impose
any new information collection burden
because it serves only to provide a
compliance date for the handling and
storage of waste requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden, or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action
will not impose any costs on small
entities. No facilities meeting the Small
Business Administration’s definition of
a small business will incur costs. We
have, therefore, concluded that this
action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small
entities.
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
51116
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in the
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. No tribal facilities are
known to be engaged in the aerospace
manufacturing or rework surface coating
operations that would be affected by
this action. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations, and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) because it does not
establish an environmental health or
safety standard. This action serves only
to provide a compliance date for the
previously promulgated handling and
storage of waste requirements.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 26, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG—National Emission
Standards for Aerospace
Manufacturing and Rework Facilities
2. Section 63.749 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 63.749 Compliance dates and
determinations.
(a) * * *
(3) Each owner or operator of a
specialty coating application operation
or handling and storage of waste
operation that begins construction or
reconstruction after February 17, 2015,
shall be in compliance with the
requirements of this subpart on
December 7, 2015, or upon startup,
whichever is later. Each owner or
operator of a specialty coating
application operation or handling and
storage of waste operation that is
existing on February 17, 2015, shall be
in compliance with the requirements of
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2016–18395 Filed 8–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 405, 424, and 455
[CMS–6073–N]
Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s
Health Insurance Programs:
Announcement of the Provider
Enrollment Moratoria Access Waiver
Demonstration of Part B NonEmergency Ground Ambulance
Suppliers and Home Health Agencies
in Moratoria-Designated Geographic
Locations
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Implementation of the waiver
demonstration.
AGENCY:
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, part 63 of title 40, chapter I,
of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PO 00000
this subpart on or before December 7,
2018.
*
*
*
*
*
Sfmt 4700
This notice announces the
Provider Enrollment Moratoria Access
Waiver Demonstration of Part B NonEmergency Ground Ambulance
Suppliers and Home Health Agencies in
6 states. The demonstration is being
implemented in accordance with
section 402 of the Social Security
Amendments of 1967 and gives CMS the
authority to grant waivers to the
statewide enrollment moratoria on a
case-by-case basis in response to access
to care issues, and to subject providers
and suppliers enrolling via such waivers
to heightened screening, oversight, and
investigations.
DATES: Effective July 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jung
Kim, (410) 786–9370. News media
representatives must contact CMS’
Public Affairs Office at (202) 690–6145
or email them at press@cms.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Affordable Care Act provided
CMS with new tools and resources to
combat fraud, waste, and abuse in
Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s
Health Insurance Program (CHIP),
including the authority to implement a
temporary moratorium on provider
enrollment in these programs. CMS uses
quantitative and qualitative data to
determine whether there is a need for a
moratorium, such as reviewing provider
and supplier saturation data for the area
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51114-51116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18395]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0830; FRL-9950-10-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS99
National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and
Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review; Clarification
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to amend the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities. In this action, we are clarifying the compliance date for
the handling and storage of waste.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 3, 2016 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives significant and relevant adverse
comment by September 2, 2016. If the EPA receives significant and
relevant adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2014-0830, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket. The EPA has established a docket for this rulemaking under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0830. All documents in this docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy at the EPA Docket
Center, EPA WJC West Building, Room Number 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room hours of operation are
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and
the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this direct final
action, contact Ms. Kim Teal, Sector Policies and Programs Division
(D243-04), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541-5580; fax number: (919) 541-5450;
and email address: teal.kim@epa.gov. For information about the
applicability of the NESHAP to a particular entity, contact Mr. John
Cox, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, (202) 564-1395,
cox.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background information. On December 7, 2015 (80 FR 76152), the EPA
finalized amendments to the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework
Facilities NESHAP based on our Risk and Technology Review. In this
action, we are clarifying the intended compliance date for sources
subject to the recently finalized handling and storage of waste
requirements.
Organization of this document. The information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this action apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments in this direct final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
[[Page 51115]]
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no
significant and relevant adverse comment.
In the final rule published December 7, 2015, we inadvertently
failed to identify the compliance date for sources subject to the
requirements for handling and storage of waste. Therefore, in this
document we are correcting that oversight. In the ``Proposed Rules''
section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposed rule to amend the National Emission
Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR
part 63, subpart GG). If significant and relevant adverse comments are
received on the proposal, we will withdraw this direct final rule.
However, we will not institute a second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For
further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
If the EPA receives significant and relevant adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that some or all of the amendments in this direct final rule
will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
B. Does this action apply to me?
Regulated entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action are shown in Table 1 of this preamble.
Table 1--Industrial Source Categories Affected By This Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS \1\
Source category NESHAP Code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Aerospace Manufacturing 336411
Facilities. and Rework Facilities. 336412
336413
336414
336415
336419
481111
481112
481211
481212
481219
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\North American Industry Classification System.
Table 1 of this preamble is not intended to be exhaustive, but
rather to provide a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by the final action for the source categories listed. To
determine whether your facility is affected, you should examine the
applicability criteria in the appropriate NESHAP. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of this NESHAP,
please contact the appropriate person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to the EPA through
https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD
ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM
the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver information
identified as CBI only to the following address: OAQPS Document Control
Officer (C404-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, and Attention Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2014-0830.
II. What are the amendments in this direct final rule?
This direct final rule provides a compliance date of December 7,
2018, for sources subject to the requirements for handling and storage
of waste in 40 CFR part 63, subpart GG. In the final rule dated
December 7, 2015, we regulated specialty coating application operations
for the first time. The compliance date for these new requirements was
December 7, 2018. We also revised and clarified requirements for
handling and storage of waste, and our intent was to specify the same
December 7, 2018, compliance date for these revised requirements (80 FR
76172-74). However, we neglected to specify a compliance date for these
revised waste handling and storage requirements in the regulatory text.
Reading the regulatory text as now written would imply that the
compliance date for these revised waste handling and storage
requirements would be September 1, 1998. Therefore, we are correcting
the rule text at 40 CFR 63.749(a)(3) to make it clear that the December
7, 2018, compliance date also applies to sources subject to the waste
storage and handling requirements.
The EPA is accepting comments only on the specific issue raised in
this direct final action and the accompanying proposed rule, the
compliance date for handling and storage of waste. The EPA is not
reopening or accepting comment on any other aspect of the NESHAP for
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulations and has assigned OMB
Control Number 2060-0314. This action does not impose any new
information collection burden because it serves only to provide a
compliance date for the handling and storage of waste requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action will not impose any costs on
small entities. No facilities meeting the Small Business
Administration's definition of a small business will incur costs. We
have, therefore, concluded that this action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small entities.
[[Page 51116]]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
the UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any
state, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. No tribal facilities are known to be engaged in
the aerospace manufacturing or rework surface coating operations that
would be affected by this action. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it
does not establish an environmental health or safety standard. This
action serves only to provide a compliance date for the previously
promulgated handling and storage of waste requirements.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 26, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 63 of title 40,
chapter I, of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG--National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing
and Rework Facilities
0
2. Section 63.749 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.749 Compliance dates and determinations.
(a) * * *
(3) Each owner or operator of a specialty coating application
operation or handling and storage of waste operation that begins
construction or reconstruction after February 17, 2015, shall be in
compliance with the requirements of this subpart on December 7, 2015,
or upon startup, whichever is later. Each owner or operator of a
specialty coating application operation or handling and storage of
waste operation that is existing on February 17, 2015, shall be in
compliance with the requirements of this subpart on or before December
7, 2018.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-18395 Filed 8-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P