Environmental Protection Agency January 11, 2011 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Federal Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport of Pollution Affecting Visibility and Best Available Retrofit Technology Determination
On January 5, 2011, EPA published a proposal in the Federal Register to disapprove a portion of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Mexico and promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to prevent emissions from New Mexico sources from interfering with other states' measures to protect visibility, and to address the requirement for best available retrofit technology (BART) for nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions. EPA has scheduled an open house and public hearing for the proposal to be held in Farmington, New Mexico on February 17, 2011. More information is provided in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Idaho; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan and Interstate Transport Plan
EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Idaho on October 25, 2010, as meeting the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) as it applies to visibility for the 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 particulate matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is also proposing to approve a portion of the revision as meeting certain requirements of the regional haze program, including the requirements for best available retrofit technology (BART).
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to Rules and Regulations for Control of Air Pollution; Permitting of Grandfathered and Electing Electric Generating Facilities
EPA is taking final action to partially approve and partially disapprove revisions of the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ, or Commission) on January 3, 2000, and July 31, 2002, as supplemented on August 5, 2009. These revisions are to regulations of the TCEQ that relate to application and permitting procedures for grandfathered electric generating facilities (EGFs). The revisions address a mandate by the Texas Legislature under Senate Bill 7 to achieve nitrogen oxide (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter (PM) emission reductions from grandfathered EGFs. The emissions reductions will contribute to achieving attainment and help ensure attainment and continued maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter in the State of Texas. As a result of these mandated emissions reductions, in accordance with section 110(l) of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended (the Act, or CAA), partial approval of these revisions will not interfere with attainment of the NAAQS, reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the Act. EPA has determined that the revisions, but for a severable provision, meet section 110, part C, and part D of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA) and EPA's regulations. Therefore, EPA is taking final action to approve the revisions but for a severable portion that allows collateral emissions increases of carbon monoxide (CO) created by the imposition of technology controls to be permitted under the State's Standard Permit (SP) for Pollution Control Projects (PCP). EPA is taking final action to disapprove this severable portion concerning the issuance of a PCP SP for the CO collateral emissions increases.
Determinations of Attainment by the Applicable Attainment Date for the Hayden, Nogales, Paul Spur/Douglas PM10
EPA is making final determinations that the Hayden, Nogales, and Paul Spur/Douglas nonattainment areas in Arizona attained the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to a nominal ten micrometers (PM10) by their applicable attainment dates of December 31, 1994. On the basis of these determinations, EPA concludes that these three ``moderate'' nonattainment areas are not subject to reclassification by operation of law to ``serious.'' EPA is not finalizing determinations with respect to the air quality in these areas subsequent to their 1994 attainment dates.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.