Environmental Protection Agency November 19, 2010 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Meeting of the National Drinking Water Advisory Council-Notice of Public Meeting
Under Section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-423, ``The Federal Advisory Committee Act,'' notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC), established under the Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.). The primary focus of the meeting will be for the Council to discuss the Climate Ready Water Utility Work Group Report. The Council will be evaluating the report and determining what recommendations the Council will transmit to the Administrator. The Council will also discuss several other activities including, the Agency's drinking water strategy, the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program, and revisions to the 1989 Total Coliform Rule (RTCR).
Finding of Substantial Inadequacy of Implementation Plan; Call for Utah State Implementation Plan Revision
Pursuant to sections 110(a)(2)(H) and 110(k)(5) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is proposing to find that the Utah State Implementation Plan (SIP) is substantially inadequate to attain or maintain the national ambient air quality standards or to otherwise comply with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Specifically, the SIP includes Utah rule R307-107, which exempts emissions during unavoidable breakdowns from compliance with emission limitations. This rule undermines EPA's, Utah's, and citizens' ability to enforce emission limitations that have been relied on to ensure attainment or maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards or meet other Clean Air Act requirements. If EPA finalizes this proposed finding of substantial inadequacy, Utah will be required to revise its SIP to correct this deficiency within 12 months of the effective date of our final rule. If EPA finds that Utah has failed to submit a complete SIP revision as required by a final rule or if EPA disapproves such a revision, such finding or disapproval would trigger clocks for mandatory sanctions and an obligation for EPA to impose a Federal Implementation Plan. EPA is also proposing that if EPA makes such a finding or disapproval, sanctions would apply consistent with 40 CFR 52.31, such that the offset sanction would apply 18 months after such finding or disapproval and highway funding restrictions would apply six months later unless EPA first takes action to stay the imposition of the sanctions or to stop the sanctions clock based on the State curing the SIP deficiencies. EPA is also requesting comment on whether EPA should exercise its discretionary authority under the Clean Air Act to impose highway funding restrictions in all areas of the State, not just in nonattainment areas.
Notice of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Applicability Determination for the Carlsbad Energy Center Project, Carlsbad, CA
This notice announces that on October 13, 2010, the EPA issued a determination that the proposal to modify the Encina Power Station is not subject to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit program under the Clean Air Act (CAA). This modification is for constructing the Carlsbad Energy Center Project, a proposed natural gas-fired power plant, at the existing Encina Power Station in the city of Carlsbad in San Diego County, California. EPA reviewed applicability for the criteria pollutants expected to be affected by the modification, including nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, particulates, volatile organic compounds, and sulfur oxides.
SFIREG Full Committee; Notice of Public Meeting
The Association of American Pesticide Control Officials (AAPCO)/State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) Full Committee will hold a 2-day meeting, beginning on December 6, 2010, and ending December 7, 2010. This notice announces the location and times for the meeting and sets forth the tentative agenda topics.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.