Executive Office for Immigration Review November 2020 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Good Cause for a Continuance in Immigration Proceedings
The Department of Justice (``Department'' or ``DOJ'') is proposing to define ``good cause,'' in the context of continuances, adjournments, and postponements, in its immigration regulations.
Motions To Reopen and Reconsider; Effect of Departure; Stay of Removal
The Department of Justice (``Department'') proposes to amend Executive Office for Immigration Review (``EOIR'') regulations governing the filing and adjudication of motions to reopen and reconsider and to add regulations governing requests for discretionary stays of removal.
Organization of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
On August 26, 2019, the Department of Justice (``Department'') published an interim final rule (``IFR'') amending the regulations related to the internal organization of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (``EOIR''). The amendments reflected changes related to the establishment of EOIR's Office of Policy (``OP'') in 2017, made related clarifications or changes to the organizational role of EOIR's Office of the General Counsel (``OGC'') and Office of Legal Access Programs (``OLAP''), updated the Department's organizational regulations to align them with EOIR's regulations, made nomenclature changes to the titles of the members of the Board of Immigration Appeals (``BIA'' or ``Board''), provided for a delegation of authority from the Attorney General to the EOIR Director (``Director'') related to the efficient disposition of appeals, and clarified the Director's authority to adjudicate cases following changes to EOIR's Recognition and Accreditation Program (``R&A Program'') in 2017. This final rule responds to comments received and adopts the provisions of the IFR with some additional amendments: Restricting the authority of the Director regarding the further delegation of certain regulatory authorities, clarifying that the Director interprets relevant regulatory provisions when adjudicating recognition and accreditation (``R&A'') cases, and reiterating the independent judgment and discretion by which the Director will consider cases subject to his adjudication.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.