Department of Commerce May 26, 2011 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

The Department of Commerce (``Department'') has determined that Viet I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. (``Viet I-Mei'') is the successor-in-interest to Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. (``Grobest & I-Mei''), and should be accorded the same antidumping duty treatment as the original company, Grobest & I-Mei for purposes of the antidumping duty order on frozen warmwater shrimp (``shrimp'') from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (``Vietnam'').

On February 14, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') affirmed the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'') decision sustaining the Department of Commerce (``Department'') redetermination on remand of the 2005-2006 administrative review of freshwater crawfish tail meat (``crawfish tail meat'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ In this redetermination the Department applied total adverse facts available (``AFA'') and assigned the respondent, Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. (``Xuzhou''), an AFA rate of 188.52 percent. As there is now a final and conclusive court decision, the Department is amending its final results.

On February 1, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on certain orange juice (OJ) from Brazil, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department has conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this order pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping.

In June 2009, pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS issued two 5-year final regulations to govern the unintentional taking of marine mammals incidental to Navy training activities conducted in the Virginia Capes (VACAPES) and Jacksonville (JAX) range complexes off the East Coast of the U.S. These regulations, which allow for the issuance of ``Letters of Authorization'' (LOAs) for the incidental take of marine mammals during the specified activities and described timeframes, prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat, as well as requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking. These rules quantify the specific amounts of training activities involving underwater detonations that will occur over the course of the 5-year rules, and indicate that marine mammal take may only be authorized in an LOA incidental to the types and amounts of training activities and explosives described. No language was included expressly allowing for deviation from those precise levels of training activities and amounts of explosives even if the total number of takes remain within the analyzed and authorized limits. Since the issuance of these rules, the Navy realized that their evolving training programs, which are linked to real world events, necessitate greater flexibility in the types and amounts of training events and explosives that they conduct and use. In response to this need, NMFS has, through this interim final rule, amended the VACAPES and JAX regulations to explicitly allow for greater flexibility in the types and amount of training activities that they conduct and explosives that they use.