Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress 2015 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Results 51 - 100 of 358
Full Circle Capital Corporation et al.; Notice of Application
Document Number: 2015-21866
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-03
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Applicants request an order to permit a business development company (``BDC'') and certain affiliated investment funds to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with other affiliated investment funds.
Sunshine Act Meeting
Document Number: 2015-21664
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Order Making Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Adjustments to Registration Fee Rates
Document Number: 2015-21562
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 2015-21556
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 2015-21555
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Starwood Capital Group Management, LLC; Notice of Application
Document Number: 2015-21554
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Document Number: 2015-21553
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 2015-21550
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-09-01
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
The RBB Fund, Inc. and Abbey Capital Limited; Notice of Application
Document Number: 2015-21206
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-08-27
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Sunshine Act Meeting
Document Number: 2015-21079
Type: Notice
Date: 2015-08-25
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Applications by Security-Based Swap Dealers or Major Security-Based Swap Participants for Statutorily Disqualified Associated Persons To Effect or Be Involved in Effecting Security-Based Swaps
Document Number: 2015-19662
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2015-08-25
Agency: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress
Pursuant to Section 15F(b)(6) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''), as added by Section 764(a) of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (``Dodd- Frank Act''), the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') is proposing Rule of Practice 194. Proposed Rule of Practice 194 would provide a process for a registered security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant (collectively, ``SBS Entity'') to make an application to the Commission for an order permitting an associated person who is subject to a statutory disqualification to effect or be involved in effecting security-based swaps on behalf of the SBS Entity. Proposed Rule of Practice 194 also would exclude an SBS Entity, subject to certain limitations, from the prohibition in Exchange Act Section 15F(b)(6) with respect to associated persons that are not natural persons for a period of 30 days following the associated person becoming subject to a statutory disqualification or 30 days following the person that is subject to a statutory disqualification becoming an associated person of an SBS Entity; for a period of 180 days following the filing of a complete application under proposed Rule of Practice 194 and notice if the application and notice are filed within the same 30-day time period; and for a period of 180 days following the filing of a complete application with, or initiation of a process by, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''), a self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') or a registered futures association pending a final decision with respect to an application or process with respect to the associated person for the membership, association, registration or listing as a principal, where the application has been filed or process started prior to or within the same 30-day time period and a notice has been filed with the Commission within the same 30-day time period. The proposed Rule of Practice 194 also would provide, in certain circumstances, for an extension of the temporary exclusion from the prohibition in Exchange Act Section 15F(b)(6) with respect to associated persons that are not natural persons to comply with the prohibition in Section 15F(b)(6). Finally, proposed Rule of Practice 194 would provide that, subject to certain conditions, an SBS Entity may permit an associated person that is subject to a statutory disqualification to effect or be involved in effecting security-based swaps on its behalf, without making an application pursuant to the proposed rule, where the Commission, CFTC, an SRO or a registered futures association has granted a prior application or otherwise granted relief from a statutory disqualification with respect to that associated person.