International Trade Commission – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("the Commission") has determined to dismiss the complaint in the above-captioned investigation as moot. The Commission has also determined to institute a rescission proceeding and to rescind the limited exclusion order and cease and desist order issued in the investigation. The rescission proceeding is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), finding the sole respondent in default. The Commission requests written submissions from the parties, interested government agencies, and other interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding, under the schedule set forth below.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on April 2, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. of Novato, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain drug products containing C-type natriuretic peptide variants and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Reissue Patent No. RE48,267 (the "RE'267 patent"). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined to review in its entirety a final initial determination ("ID") of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ"), finding no violation of section 337. The Commission requests written submissions from the parties on the issues under review and submissions from the parties, interested government agencies, and other interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding, under the schedule set forth below.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to (1) not review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 44) issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") granting a motion filed by JBS Hair, Inc. ("JBS Hair") to terminate the investigation as to the remaining active respondents based on withdrawal of the complaint, and (2) to request written submissions from the parties, interested government agencies, and interested persons, under the schedule set forth below, on remedy, the public interest, and bonding with respect to respondents previously found to be in default.

The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act"), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on ceramic tile from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.

The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act"), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.

The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act"), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from Russia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on settlement. The investigation is hereby terminated.

Notice is hereby given that on April 18, 2025, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued a Final Initial Determination on Violation ("FID") of Section 337. The FID includes a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 16) issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") terminating the investigation as to the remaining active respondents based on settlement, and to request written submissions from the parties, interested government agencies, and interested persons, under the schedule set forth below, on remedy, the public interest, and bonding.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined to issue a limited exclusion order ("LEO") barring entry of certain components for injection molding machines, and products containing the same by or on behalf of respondent Ningbo AO Sheng Mold Co., Ltd., d/b/a AOSIMI ("AOSIMI") previously found to be in default. The investigation is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on March 13, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Credo Semiconductor Inc. of San Jose, California and Credo Technology Group Ltd. of the Cayman Islands. An amended complaint was filed on March 18, 2025. A supplement to the amended complaint was filed on March 27, 2025. A second supplement was filed on March 31, 2025. A third supplement was filed on April 7, 2025. The amended complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain active electrical cables and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,877,233 ("the '233 patent"); U.S. Patent No. 11,012,252 ("the '252 patent"); and U.S. Patent No. 11,032,111 ("the '111 patent"). The amended complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.

The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of an investigation and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping duty investigation No. 731-TA-1742 (Preliminary) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 ("the Act") to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of lattice-boom crawler cranes (LBCCs) from Japan, provided for in subheading 8426.49.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value. Unless the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") extends the time for initiation, the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping duty investigation in 45 days, or in this case by May 27, 2025. The Commission's views must be transmitted to Commerce within five business days thereafter, or by June 3, 2025.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 58) issued by the chief administrative law judge ("CALJ") granting a motion filed by complainants R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company ("RJR") to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 10) issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") granting an unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation ("NOI") by terminating a current respondent, Hunan Sijiu Electronic Technology Co. ("HSET"), adding a new respondent, HK Sijiu International Share Co. ("HK Sijiu"), and adding allegations of infringement of a new design patent, U.S. Design Patent No. D877,214 ("the 'D214 patent"). The Commission has also determined not to review the ALJ's extension of the target date to May 13, 2026.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to institute a formal enforcement proceeding relating to the general exclusion order ("GEO") issued on November 15, 2022 and cease and desist orders ("CDOs") issued on November 18, 2024, in the above-referenced investigation.