Agencies and Commissions February 10, 2005 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: E5-572
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: E5-569
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part
Document Number: C5-1731
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Sunshine Act Meeting; Open Commission Meeting Thursday, February 10, 2005
Document Number: 05-2684
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Federal Communications Commission, Agencies and Commissions
The Commission will consider a Second Report and Order and First Order on Reconsideration concerning the carriage obligations of cable operators with respect to digital broadcasters. 2........................ Media........................... Title: WRGT Licensee, LLC for Assignment of License of WRGT-TV, Dayton, Ohio, to WRGT Licensee, LLC (New Nevada, LLC); WVAH Licensee, LLC for Assignment of License of WVAH-TV, Charleston, West Virginia, to WVAH Licensee, LLC (New Nevada, LLC); WTAT Licensee, LLC for Assignment of License of WTAT-TV, Charleston, South Carolina, to WTAT Licensee, LLC (New Nevada, LLC); Cunningham Broadcasting Corp. (Transferor) and Sinclair Acquisition XIII, Inc. (Transferee) for consent to transfer of control of television station WTTE-TV, Columbus, Ohio; Cunningham Broadcasting Corp. (Transferor) and Sinclair Acquisition XIII, Inc. (Transferee) For consent to transfer of control of television station WNUV-TV, Baltimore, Maryland. Summary: The Commission will consider a Memorandum Opinion and Order concerning an Application for Review filed by various licensee subsidiaries of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. seeking review of a decision by the Media Bureau dismissing applications through which Sinclair sought to acquire television stations from the licensee subsidiaries of Cunningham Broadcasting Corporation. 3........................ Consumer & Governmental Affairs. Title: Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (CG Docket No. 02-278). Summary: The Commission will consider a Second Order on Reconsideration addressing petitions for reconsideration filed regarding the national do- not-call registry and other TCPA rules. 4........................ Consumer & Governmental Affairs. Title: Rules and Regulations Implementing Minimum Customer Account Record Exchange Obligations on All Local and Interexchange Carriers (CG Docket No. 02-386).
Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure
Document Number: 05-2599
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Judicial Conference of the United States, Agencies and Commissions
The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold an open meeting on Saturday, February 12, 2005, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting will be held in the Judicial Conference Center of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle, NE. [The meeting will follow the Saturday, February 12, 2005, public hearing which will begin at 8:30 a.m., and end at 12 noon. Original notice of the February 12, 2005, public hearing appeared in the Federal Register of February 1, 2005.]
Price Index Increases for Expenditure and Contribution Limitations
Document Number: 05-2598
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Federal Election Commission, Agencies and Commissions
As mandated by provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (``BCRA''), the Federal Election Commission (``FEC'' or ``the Commission'') is adjusting certain expenditure and contribution limitations set forth in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (``FECA'' or ``the Act''), to account for increases in the consumer price index. Additional details appear in the supplemental information that follows.
Hydro Resources, Inc.; Notice of Reconstitution
Document Number: 05-2565
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision on the Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System, Central Utah Project
Document Number: 05-2548
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, Agencies and Commissions
On January 27, 2005, Jody L. Williams, Chairman of the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission (Mitigation Commission) signed the Record of Decision (ROD) which documents selection of the Proposed Action as presented in the 2004 Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System Final Environmental Impact Statement (INT FES 04-41) (2004 ULS FEIS) filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on September 30, 2004. The Mitigation Commission, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and Department of the Interior served as joint lead agencies in preparing the 2004 ULS FEIS. The Proposed Action, called the Spanish Fork Canyon-Provo Reservoir Canal Alternative, one other action alternative called the Bonneville Unit Water Alternative, and a No Action alternative are described and evaluated in the 2004 ULS FEIS, upon which the ROD is based. The Spanish Fork Canyon-Provo Reservoir Canal Pipeline Alternative will deliver an average annual transbasin diversion of 101,900 acre- feet from the Colorado River Basin to the Bonneville Basin, which consists of a delivery of: 30,000 acre-feet of Municipal and Industrial (M&I) water for secondary use to southern Utah County and 30,000 acre- feet of M&I water to Salt Lake County water treatment plants; 1,590 acre-feet of M&I water already contracted to southern Utah County cities; and 40,310 acre-feet of M&I water to Utah Lake for exchange to Jordanelle Reservoir. A portion of the 40,310 acre-feet delivered to Utah Lake would be delivered via lower Hobble Creek to provide spawning habitat for the endangered June sucker, and via lower Provo River where it would help maintain minimum instream flows for June sucker spawning and other fishery and aquatic benefits. The 30,000 acre-feet (less the water returned to Interior under the Section 207 Program) of M&I water utilized in southern Utah County would be used in the cities' secondary water systems. Use of this water as a potable supply in the future would require additional NEPA compliance. Under the Proposed Action, Interior would acquire all of the District's secondary water rights in Utah Lake. These rights would amount to a maximum of 57,073 acre-feet. The acquired water rights would be used to exchange project water to Jordanelle Reservoir. All remaining environmental commitments associated with the Bonneville Unit would be completed and previously committed in-stream flows within the Bonneville Unit area and statutorily mandated in-stream flows would be provided. The Acting Assistant Secretary for Water and Science, Department of the Interior issued a separate ROD for the ULS on December 22, 2004, also selecting the Proposed Action for implementation. The Assistant Secretary's separate decision is necessitated by the responsibility and authority of the Department of the Interior for other aspects of the project beyond the scope of the Mitigation Commission to mitigate for reclamation projects.
Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact to Construct a Group-Site Campground in Diamond Fork Canyon, UT
Document Number: 05-2547
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-10
Agency: Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, Agencies and Commissions
The Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission has issued a Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact to construct a group-site campground in Diamond Fork Canyon in Utah County, Utah. The new campground will have a capacity of approximately 475 people at one time and will replace group camp sites removed from the Diamond and Palmyra Campgrounds, which were reconstructed in the year 2000. The project will also provide additional group-site camping as a feature of the Diamond Fork System of the Central Utah Project. A 1998 environmental assessment and associated decision documents prepared by the Mitigation Commission indicated that the group-site facilities removed from the Diamond and Palmyra Campgrounds would be replaced in a more favorable location and that the size and location would be analyzed in a separate analysis. This environmental analysis is a fulfillment of that 1998 commitment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.