Ferrosilicon From Kazakhstan: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 14077-14079 [2025-05303]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 59 / Friday, March 28, 2025 / Notices
consistent with section 705(c)(3) of the
Act.
Additionally, as a result of this final
affirmative determination of critical
circumstances for all other producers
and exporters, we are instructing CBP to
suspend liquidation of all entries of
subject merchandise from those
producers and exporters of ferrosilicon
from Malaysia, which were entered or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption 90 days prior to the date
of publication of the notice of the
Preliminary Determination in the
Federal Register,8 pursuant to section
705(c)(4)(B) of the Act.
If the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we
will issue a countervailing duty order,
reinstate the suspension of liquidation
under section 706(a) of the Act, and
require a cash deposit of estimated
countervailing duties for such entries of
subject merchandise in the amounts
indicated above, in accordance with
section 706(a) of the Act. If the ITC
determines that material injury, or
threat of material injury, does not exist,
this proceeding will be terminated, and
all estimated duties deposited or
securities posted as a result of the
suspension of liquidation will be
refunded or canceled.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, Commerce will notify the ITC
of its final affirmative determination
that countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
ferrosilicon from Malaysia. Because the
final determination is affirmative, in
accordance with section 705(b) of the
Act, the ITC will make its final
determination as to whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports of
ferrosilicon from Malaysia no later than
45 days after this final determination. In
addition, we are making available to the
ITC all non-privileged and
nonproprietary information related to
this investigation. We will allow the ITC
access to all privileged and business
proprietary information in our files,
provided the ITC confirms that it will
not disclose such information, either
publicly or under an administrative
protective order (APO), without the
written consent of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. If the ITC determines that
material injury or threat of material
injury does not exist, this proceeding
8 See
Preliminary Determination, 89 FR 73364.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Mar 27, 2025
Jkt 265001
will be terminated and all cash deposits
will be refunded.
If the ITC determines that such injury
does exist, Commerce will issue a
countervailing duty order directing CBP
to assess, upon further instruction by
Commerce, countervailing duties on all
imports of the subject merchandise that
are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation, as discussed above in the
‘‘Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation’’ section.
Administrative Protective Order
In the event that the ITC issues a final
negative injury determination, this
notice will serve as the only reminder
to parties subject to an APO of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 705(d)
and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
Dated: March 21, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers all
forms and sizes of ferrosilicon, regardless of
grade, including ferrosilicon briquettes.
Ferrosilicon is a ferroalloy containing by
weight four percent or more iron, more than
eight percent but not more than 96 percent
silicon, three percent or less phosphorus, 30
percent or less manganese, less than three
percent magnesium, and 10 percent or less of
any other element. The merchandise covered
also includes product described as slag, if the
product meets these specifications.
Subject merchandise includes material
matching the above description that has been
finished, packaged, or otherwise processed in
a third country, including by performing any
grinding or any other finishing, packaging, or
processing that would not otherwise remove
the merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the ferrosilicon.
Ferrosilicon is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7202.21.1000, 7202.21.5000,
7202.21.7500, 7202.21.9000, 7202.29.0010,
and 7202.29.0050 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14077
While the HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope remains
dispositive.
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Final Determination of Critical
Circumstances, in Part
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Application of Adverse Inferences
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Rent Paid by OM
Materials and Pertama is a
Countervailable Subsidy
Comment 2: Whether the Industrial
Building Allowance is Countervailable
Comment 3: Whether the Import Duty and
Sales Tax Exemptions for Raw Materials
is a Countervailable Subsidy
Comment 4: Whether the Facilitation Fund
Agreement Grant is Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Properly
Calculated a Benefit From the
Discounted Land Premiums
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Properly
Allocated the Non-Recurring Benefits
From the Sarawak Government’s Waiver
of Land-Use Installment Payments
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025–05306 Filed 3–27–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–834–812]
Ferrosilicon From Kazakhstan: Final
Affirmative Determination of Sales at
Less-Than-Fair-Value and Final
Negative Determination of Critical
Circumstances
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
imports of ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan
are being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV) for the period of investigation
(POI) January 1, 2023, through
December 31, 2023.
DATES: Applicable March 28, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mira
Warrier, AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8031
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
14078
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 59 / Friday, March 28, 2025 / Notices
Background
On November 6, 2024, Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register.1
We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary
Determination. For a complete
description of the events that followed
the Preliminary Determination, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is ferrosilicon. For a
complete description of the scope of this
investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
No interested party commented on the
scope of the investigation as it appeared
in the Preliminary Determination.
Therefore, no changes were made to the
scope of the investigation.
Final Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
We continue to find that critical
circumstances do not exist for YDD
Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP;
and KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine
LLP (collectively, the YDD Single
Entity), TNC Kazchrome JSC
(Kazchrome), and all other companies
not individually examined pursuant to
section 733(e)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.206. For a discussion of
Commerce’s critical circumstance
analysis, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Verification
Commerce conducted verification of
the information relied upon in making
1 See Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan: Preliminary
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, Preliminary Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances, Postponement of Final
Determination, and Extension of Provisional
Measures, 89 FR 88007 (November 6, 2024)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation of Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Mar 27, 2025
Jkt 265001
its final determination in this
investigation, in accordance with
section 782(i) of the Act. Specifically,
Commerce conducted on-site
verifications of YDD Corporation LLP;
Asia FerroAlloys LLP; and KazSilicon
Metallurgical Combine LLP
(collectively, the YDD Single Entity) 3
and Kazchrome’s 4 home market sales,
U.S. sales, and cost of production. We
used standard verification procedures,
including an examination of relevant
sales and accounting records, and
original source documents provided by
the YDD Single Entity and Kazchrome.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs submitted by interested
parties in this investigation are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached to this notice
as Appendix II.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Determination, we made certain changes
to both the YDD Single Entity’s and
Kazchrome’s preliminary weightedaverage dumping margin calculations.
For a discussion of these changes, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
provides that the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for all other
producers and exporters not
individually investigated shall be equal
to the weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding
rates that are zero, de minimis, or
determined entirely under section 776
of the Act.
In this investigation, Commerce
calculated estimated weighted-average
3 See Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of the Sales
Response of YDD Corporation LLP; Asia
FerroAlloys LLP; and KazSilicon Metallurgical
Combine LLP (collectively, the YDD Single Entity)
in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of
Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,’’ dated December 27,
2024; and ‘‘Verification of the Cost Response of
YDD Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP; and
KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP in the Less
Than Fair Value Investigation of Ferrosilicon from
Kazakhstan,’’ dated February 10, 2025.
4 See Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of the Sales
Response of TNC Kazchrome JSC in the Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation of Ferrosilicon from
Kazakhstan,’’ dated December 27, 2024;
‘‘Verification of the Cost Response of TNC
Kazchrome JSC in the Less Than Fair Value
Investigation of Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,’’
dated February 10, 2025.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
dumping margins for Kazchrome and
the YDD Single Entity that are not zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts
otherwise available. Commerce
calculated the all-others rate using a
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
calculated for the examined respondents
using each company’s publicly-ranged
values for the merchandise under
consideration.5
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the
following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist:
Exporter/producer
YDD Corporation LLP; Asia
FerroAlloys LLP; KazSilicon
Metallurgical Combine LLP 6 ...
TNC Kazchrome JSC .................
All Others ....................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
6.01
6.20
6.05
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the
calculations and analysis performed in
connection with this final determination
to interested parties within five days of
any public announcement or, if there is
no public announcement, within five
days of the publication date of this
notice in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘All-Others Rate
Calculation,’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
With two respondents under examination,
Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the estimated weighted-average dumping
margins calculated for the examined respondents;
(B) a simple average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins calculated for the
examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average
of the estimated weighted average dumping margins
calculated for the examined respondents using each
company’s publicly-ranged U.S. sales values for the
merchandise under consideration. Commerce then
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate
closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all
other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball
Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final
Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and
Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. As complete
publicly ranged sales data were available,
Commerce based the all others rate on the publicly
ranged sales data of the mandatory respondents. For
a complete analysis of the data, see the All Others
Rate Calculation Memorandum.
6 Commerce has found that YDD Corporation LLP,
Asia FerroAlloys LLP, and KazSilicon Metallurgical
Combine LLP comprise a single entity. See
Preliminary Determination PDM.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 59 / Friday, March 28, 2025 / Notices
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
In accordance with section
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend
liquidation of entries of subject
merchandise, as described in Appendix
I of this notice, which were entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, on or after November 6,
2024, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination in the
Federal Register. These suspension of
liquidation instructions will remain in
effect until further notice.
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), upon
the publication of this notice, we will
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit
for estimated antidumping duties for
such entries as follows: (1) the cash
deposit rates for the companies listed in
the table above are the company-specific
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins determined in this final
determination; (2) if the exporter is not
a respondent listed in the table above,
but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate is the company-specific
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin established for that producer of
the subject merchandise; and (3) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
and exporters is the all-others estimated
weighted-average dumping margin
listed in the table above. These
suspension of liquidation instructions
will remain in effect until further notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
U.S. International Trade Commission
(ITC) Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, Commerce will notify the ITC
of its final affirmative determination of
sales at LTFV. Because Commerce’s
final determination is affirmative, in
accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
Act, the ITC will make its final
determination as to whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports or
sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
importation of ferrosilicon from
Kazakhstan, no later than 45 days after
this final determination. If the ITC
determines that such injury does not
exist, this proceeding will be
terminated, all cash deposits posted will
be refunded, and suspension of
liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist,
Commerce will issue an antidumping
duty order directing CBP to assess, upon
further instruction by Commerce,
antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Mar 27, 2025
Jkt 265001
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation, as
discussed in the ‘‘Continuation of
Suspension of Liquidation’’ section
above.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice will serve as a final
reminder to parties subject to an APO of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
735(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
Dated: March 21, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers all
forms and sizes of ferrosilicon, regardless of
grade, including ferrosilicon briquettes.
Ferrosilicon is a ferroalloy containing by
weight four percent or more iron, more than
eight percent but not more than 96 percent
silicon, three percent or less phosphorus, 30
percent or less manganese, less than three
percent magnesium, and 10 percent or less of
any other element. The merchandise covered
also includes product described as slag, if the
product meets these specifications.
Subject merchandise includes material
matching the above description that has been
finished, packaged, or otherwise processed in
a third country, including by performing any
grinding or any other finishing, packaging, or
processing that would not otherwise remove
the merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the ferrosilicon.
Ferrosilicon is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7202.21.1000, 7202.21.5000,
7202.21.7500, 7202.21.9000, 7202.29.0010,
and 7202.29.0050 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
While the HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope remains
dispositive.
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Final Negative Determination of Critical
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14079
Circumstances
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Date of Sale
Comment 2: Whether Kazchrome’s Home
Market is Viable
Comment 3: Whether Kazchrome’s
Purported Home Market Sales to An
Affiliate Should Be Excluded from The
Home Market Sales Database
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Deduct an Amount from Kazchrome’s
U.S. Sales To Account for a Specific
Adjustment
Comment 5: Whether to Apply our
Verification Findings Concerning
Methodological and Clerical Errors in
Kazchrome’s Reported Costs
Comment 6: Whether to Include Foreign
Exchange Gain or Loss in Financial
Expenses for Kazchrome
Comment 7: Whether to Apply Partial
Adverse Facts Available (AFA) with
Respect to Kazchrome’s Failure to
Provide Affiliated Party Information on a
Timely Basis
Comment 8: Whether to Apply the Major
Input Rule to Kazchrome’s Electricity
Costs
Comment 9: Whether the YDD Single
Entity’s Control Number Reporting
Methodology is Deficient
Comment 10: YDD Single Entity’s Sales to
Canada
Comment 11: Whether to Continue to
Apply Partial AFA to YDD
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should
Deduct YDD Single Entity’s Reported
Customs Expense from U.S. Gross Unit
Price
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should
Continue to Adjust Negative Margins in
the YDD Single Entity’s Margin Program
Comment 14: Whether to Adjust for the
YDD Single Entity’s Cost Verification
Findings
Comment 15: Whether to Apply the Major
Input Rule to the Transactions Between
the Collapsed YDD Single Entity
Companies
Comment 16: Whether to Apply the Major
Input Rule to the YDD Single Entity’s
Purchases of Electricity from Affiliated
Parties
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025–05303 Filed 3–27–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–885]
Polyester Textured Yarn From India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2023
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
finds that polyester textured yarn (yarn)
from India was not sold at less than
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 59 (Friday, March 28, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14077-14079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-05303]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-834-812]
Ferrosilicon From Kazakhstan: Final Affirmative Determination of
Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value and Final Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
imports of ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan are being, or are likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) for the period
of investigation (POI) January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023.
DATES: Applicable March 28, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mira Warrier, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-8031
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 14078]]
Background
On November 6, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register.\1\ We invited interested parties
to comment on the Preliminary Determination. For a complete description
of the events that followed the Preliminary Determination, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Negative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, Postponement of Final
Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 89 FR 88007
(November 6, 2024) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation of Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is ferrosilicon. For a
complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix
I.
Scope Comments
No interested party commented on the scope of the investigation as
it appeared in the Preliminary Determination. Therefore, no changes
were made to the scope of the investigation.
Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances
We continue to find that critical circumstances do not exist for
YDD Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP; and KazSilicon Metallurgical
Combine LLP (collectively, the YDD Single Entity), TNC Kazchrome JSC
(Kazchrome), and all other companies not individually examined pursuant
to section 733(e)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.206. For a discussion of Commerce's critical
circumstance analysis, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Verification
Commerce conducted verification of the information relied upon in
making its final determination in this investigation, in accordance
with section 782(i) of the Act. Specifically, Commerce conducted on-
site verifications of YDD Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP; and
KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP (collectively, the YDD Single
Entity) \3\ and Kazchrome's \4\ home market sales, U.S. sales, and cost
of production. We used standard verification procedures, including an
examination of relevant sales and accounting records, and original
source documents provided by the YDD Single Entity and Kazchrome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memoranda, ``Verification of the Sales Response of YDD
Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP; and KazSilicon Metallurgical
Combine LLP (collectively, the YDD Single Entity) in the Less-Than-
Fair-Value Investigation of Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,'' dated
December 27, 2024; and ``Verification of the Cost Response of YDD
Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP; and KazSilicon Metallurgical
Combine LLP in the Less Than Fair Value Investigation of
Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,'' dated February 10, 2025.
\4\ See Memoranda, ``Verification of the Sales Response of TNC
Kazchrome JSC in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of
Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,'' dated December 27, 2024;
``Verification of the Cost Response of TNC Kazchrome JSC in the Less
Than Fair Value Investigation of Ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan,''
dated February 10, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
interested parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix II.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Determination, we made
certain changes to both the YDD Single Entity's and Kazchrome's
preliminary weighted-average dumping margin calculations. For a
discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated
weighted-average dumping margin for all other producers and exporters
not individually investigated shall be equal to the weighted average of
the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding rates that
are zero, de minimis, or determined entirely under section 776 of the
Act.
In this investigation, Commerce calculated estimated weighted-
average dumping margins for Kazchrome and the YDD Single Entity that
are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise
available. Commerce calculated the all-others rate using a weighted
average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated
for the examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged
values for the merchandise under consideration.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``All-Others Rate Calculation,'' dated
concurrently with this notice. With two respondents under
examination, Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weighted-average of
the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the
examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the examined
respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the estimated weighted
average dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents
using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sales values for the
merchandise under consideration. Commerce then compares (B) and (C)
to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate
rate for all other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball Bearings
and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United
Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews,
Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an
Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662 (September 1, 2010), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. As
complete publicly ranged sales data were available, Commerce based
the all others rate on the publicly ranged sales data of the
mandatory respondents. For a complete analysis of the data, see the
All Others Rate Calculation Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Commerce has found that YDD Corporation LLP, Asia
FerroAlloys LLP, and KazSilicon Metallurgical Combine LLP comprise a
single entity. See Preliminary Determination PDM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
YDD Corporation LLP; Asia FerroAlloys LLP; KazSilicon 6.01
Metallurgical Combine LLP \6\..............................
TNC Kazchrome JSC........................................... 6.20
All Others.................................................. 6.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations and analysis
performed in connection with this final determination to interested
parties within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days of the publication date of this
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
[[Page 14079]]
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise, as described in
Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, on or after November 6, 2024, the date of
publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register.
These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect
until further notice.
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(d), upon the publication of this notice, we will instruct CBP
to require a cash deposit for estimated antidumping duties for such
entries as follows: (1) the cash deposit rates for the companies listed
in the table above are the company-specific estimated weighted-average
dumping margins determined in this final determination; (2) if the
exporter is not a respondent listed in the table above, but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate is the company-specific
estimated weighted-average dumping margin established for that producer
of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers and exporters is the all-others estimated weighted-average
dumping margin listed in the table above. These suspension of
liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the ITC of its final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV.
Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance
with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final
determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of
imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of
ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan, no later than 45 days after this final
determination. If the ITC determines that such injury does not exist,
this proceeding will be terminated, all cash deposits posted will be
refunded, and suspension of liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an
antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation, as discussed in the ``Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation'' section above.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice will serve as a final reminder to parties subject to an
APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in accordance with accordance with 19
CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: March 21, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers all forms and sizes of
ferrosilicon, regardless of grade, including ferrosilicon
briquettes. Ferrosilicon is a ferroalloy containing by weight four
percent or more iron, more than eight percent but not more than 96
percent silicon, three percent or less phosphorus, 30 percent or
less manganese, less than three percent magnesium, and 10 percent or
less of any other element. The merchandise covered also includes
product described as slag, if the product meets these
specifications.
Subject merchandise includes material matching the above
description that has been finished, packaged, or otherwise processed
in a third country, including by performing any grinding or any
other finishing, packaging, or processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if
performed in the country of manufacture of the ferrosilicon.
Ferrosilicon is currently classifiable under subheadings
7202.21.1000, 7202.21.5000, 7202.21.7500, 7202.21.9000,
7202.29.0010, and 7202.29.0050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS). While the HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope remains dispositive.
Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Date of Sale
Comment 2: Whether Kazchrome's Home Market is Viable
Comment 3: Whether Kazchrome's Purported Home Market Sales to An
Affiliate Should Be Excluded from The Home Market Sales Database
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Deduct an Amount from
Kazchrome's U.S. Sales To Account for a Specific Adjustment
Comment 5: Whether to Apply our Verification Findings Concerning
Methodological and Clerical Errors in Kazchrome's Reported Costs
Comment 6: Whether to Include Foreign Exchange Gain or Loss in
Financial Expenses for Kazchrome
Comment 7: Whether to Apply Partial Adverse Facts Available
(AFA) with Respect to Kazchrome's Failure to Provide Affiliated
Party Information on a Timely Basis
Comment 8: Whether to Apply the Major Input Rule to Kazchrome's
Electricity Costs
Comment 9: Whether the YDD Single Entity's Control Number
Reporting Methodology is Deficient
Comment 10: YDD Single Entity's Sales to Canada
Comment 11: Whether to Continue to Apply Partial AFA to YDD
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Deduct YDD Single Entity's
Reported Customs Expense from U.S. Gross Unit Price
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Adjust Negative
Margins in the YDD Single Entity's Margin Program
Comment 14: Whether to Adjust for the YDD Single Entity's Cost
Verification Findings
Comment 15: Whether to Apply the Major Input Rule to the
Transactions Between the Collapsed YDD Single Entity Companies
Comment 16: Whether to Apply the Major Input Rule to the YDD
Single Entity's Purchases of Electricity from Affiliated Parties
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-05303 Filed 3-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P