Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 13451-13452 [2025-04915]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 55 / Monday, March 24, 2025 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–823–819] Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022–2023 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe (seamless pipe) from Ukraine was sold at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. DATES: Applicable March 24, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Anadio, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3166. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Background On September 13, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register.1 On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by 90 days.2 The deadline for the final results of this review is April 11, 2025. Interpipe,3 the sole mandatory respondent under review, and the domestic interested party Vallourec Star, L.P. (the petitioner), each submitted comments on the Preliminary Results.4 For a description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of 1 See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Ukraine: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 74919 (September 13, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,’’ dated December 9, 2024. 3 Interpipe refers to the collapsed entity, Interpipe Ukraine LLC, PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant, LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, Interpipe Europe S.A., and JSC Interpipe Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant. See Preliminary Results PDM at the sections titled ‘‘Summary’’ and ‘‘Affiliation/Single Entity.’’ 4 See Interpipe’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Interpipe,’’ dated October 22, 2024; see also Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petitioner’s Case Brief,’’ dated October 15, 2024; and Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Letter in Lieu of Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated October 28, 2024. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Mar 21, 2025 Jkt 265001 13451 the issues raised by parties for these final results of review, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Disclosure Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice in the Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Scope of the Order 6 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all The merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is seamless pipe from appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these Ukraine. For a full description of the final results of review.7 We calculated scope, see the Issues and Decision importer-specific ad valorem Memorandum. assessment rates for the merchandise by Analysis of Comments Received dividing the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for all Commerce addressed all the issues reviewed sales to the importer by the raised by interested parties in their total entered value of the merchandise briefs in the Issues and Decision sold to the importer, in accordance with Memorandum. A list of these issues is 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an attached as an appendix to this notice. importer-specific ad valorem The Issues and Decision Memorandum assessment rate is not zero or de is a public document and is on file minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to electronically via Enforcement and collect the appropriate duties at the time Compliance’s Antidumping and of liquidation. Where an importerCountervailing Duty Centralized specific ad valorem assessment rate is Electronic Service System (ACCESS). zero or de minimis, Commerce will ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping complete version of the Issues and 8 Decision Memorandum can be accessed duties. In accordance with Commerce’s directly at https://access.trade.gov/ ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate Final Results of Review POR entries of the subject merchandise that Interpipe produced and sold, but We determine that the following did not know it was destined for the estimated weighted-average dumping United States, at the all-others rate (i.e., margin exists for the period August 1, 23.75 percent) 9 if there is no rate for the 2022, through July 31, 2023: intermediate company(ies) involved in Weighted- the transaction.10 Commerce intends to issue average Exporter/producer dumping assessment instructions to CBP no margin earlier than 35 days after the date of (percent) publication of this notice in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC the U.S. Court of International Trade, Interpipe Niznedneprovsky the assessment instructions will direct Tube Rolling Plant/LLC Interpipe Niko Tube/Interpipe CBP not to liquidate relevant entries Europe S.A./JSC Interpipe until the time for parties to file a request Novomoskovsk Pipe Producfor a statutory injunction has expired tion Plant ................................. 2.07 (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review to parties to the proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022– 2023 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Ukraine,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 6 See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, and Ukraine: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 47055 (August 23, 2021) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 8 Id., 77 FR 8101, 8102; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 9 See Order, 86 FR 47055. 10 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 13452 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 55 / Monday, March 24, 2025 / Notices Federal Register, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for Interpipe will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin listed in the table above; (2) for companies that were previously reviewed or investigated in this proceeding that are not listed in the table above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the rate assigned to the company in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was examined; (3) if the exporter of the subject merchandise does not have a companyspecific rate but the producer of the subject merchandise does, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate assigned to the producer of the subject merchandise in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the producer was examined; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the allothers rate of 23.75 percent that was established in the less-than-fair-value investigation in this proceeding.11 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 11 See Order, 84 FR at 47057. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Mar 21, 2025 Jkt 265001 Dated: March 17, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether to Grant Interpipe a Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset Comment 2: Whether Commerce Erred in Calculating Indirect Selling Expenses Comment 3: Whether to Classify Barge Expenses as Movement or CEP Expenses V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2025–04915 Filed 3–21–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–201–866, C–549–855] Certain Chassis and Subassemblies Thereof From Mexico and Thailand: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Applicable March 18, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jose Rivera at (202) 482–0842 (Mexico) and Ian Riggs at (202) 482–3810 (Thailand), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: The Petitions On February 26, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions concerning imports of certain chassis and subassemblies thereof (chassis) from Mexico and Thailand filed in proper form on behalf of the U.S. Chassis Manufacturers Coalition (the petitioner),1 the members of which are domestic producers of chassis.2 The CVD Petitions were accompanied by antidumping duty (AD) petitions concerning imports of chassis from 1 The members of the U.S. Chassis Manufacturers Coalition are Cheetah Chassis Corporation and Stoughton Trailers, LLC. 2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,’’ dated February 26, 2025 (Petitions). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Mexico, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.3 Between February 28, and March 10, 2025, Commerce requested supplemental information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petitions in supplemental questionnaires.4 Between March 4 and 11, 2025, the petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional information.5 In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of Mexico (GOM) and Government of Thailand (GOT) (collectively, Governments) are providing countervailable subsidies, within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of chassis in Mexico and Thailand, and that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, the domestic industry producing chassis in the United States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are initiating CVD investigations, the Petitions were accompanied by information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting its allegations. Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petitions on behalf of the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party, as defined in section 771(9)(F) of the Act.6 Commerce also finds that the petitioner 3 Id. 4 See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Supplemental Questions,’’ dated February 28, 2025 (First General Issues Questionnaire); see also Country-Specific Supplemental Questionnaires: Mexico Supplemental and Thailand Supplemental, dated March 3, 2025; Memorandum, ‘‘Phone Call with Counsel to the Petitioner,’’ dated March 7, 2025 (March 7, 2025 Scope Memorandum); and Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Supplemental Questions,’’ dated March 10, 2025 (Third General Issues Questionnaire). 5 See Petitioner’s Letters, ‘‘Petitioner Response to 1st Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume I of the Petition,’’ dated March 4, 2025 (First General Issues Supplement); Country-Specific CVD Supplemental Responses: Mexico CVD Supplement, dated March 5, 2025; First Thailand CVD Supplement, dated March 7, 2025; and Second Thailand CVD Supplement, dated March 10, 2025; ‘‘Petitioner Response to 2nd Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume I of the Petition,’’ dated March 10, 2025 (Second General Issues Supplement); and ‘‘Petitioner Response to 3rd Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume I of the Petition,’’ dated March 11, 2025 (Third General Issues Supplement). The petitioner also filed a supplement correcting a clerical error and providing a complete replacement of Exhibit I–13 of Volume I of the Petitions. See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Supplement to Exhibit I–13 of Volume I General Issues Petition,’’ dated February 27, 2025 (Revised Exhibit I–13). 6 The members of the petitioning coalition are interested parties under section 771(9)(C) of the Act. E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 55 (Monday, March 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13451-13452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-04915]



[[Page 13451]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-823-819]


Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
From Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe 
(seamless pipe) from Ukraine was sold at prices below normal value 
during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 
2023.

DATES: Applicable March 24, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Anadio, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3166.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 13, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results 
of this administrative review in the Federal Register.\1\ On December 
9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative 
proceeding by 90 days.\2\ The deadline for the final results of this 
review is April 11, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and 
Pressure Pipe from Ukraine: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 74919 (September 13, 2024) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interpipe,\3\ the sole mandatory respondent under review, and the 
domestic interested party Vallourec Star, L.P. (the petitioner), each 
submitted comments on the Preliminary Results.\4\ For a description of 
the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, as well as a 
full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results 
of review, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ Commerce 
conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Interpipe refers to the collapsed entity, Interpipe Ukraine 
LLC, PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant, LLC 
Interpipe Niko Tube, Interpipe Europe S.A., and JSC Interpipe 
Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant. See Preliminary Results PDM at 
the sections titled ``Summary'' and ``Affiliation/Single Entity.''
    \4\ See Interpipe's Letter, ``Case Brief of Interpipe,'' dated 
October 22, 2024; see also Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitioner's Case 
Brief,'' dated October 15, 2024; and Petitioner's Letter, ``Letter 
in Lieu of Rebuttal Brief,'' dated October 28, 2024.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2022-2023 Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, 
Line, and Pressure Pipe from Ukraine,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and 
Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, 
and Ukraine: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 47055 (August 23, 2021) 
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is seamless pipe 
from Ukraine. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    Commerce addressed all the issues raised by interested parties in 
their briefs in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these 
issues is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping 
margin exists for the period August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                     Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube          2.07
 Rolling Plant/LLC Interpipe Niko Tube/Interpipe Europe
 S.A./JSC Interpipe Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant.....
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these 
final results of review to parties to the proceeding within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these final results 
of review.\7\ We calculated importer-specific ad valorem assessment 
rates for the merchandise by dividing the total amount of antidumping 
duties calculated for all reviewed sales to the importer by the total 
entered value of the merchandise sold to the importer, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific ad valorem 
assessment rate is not zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP 
to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where an 
importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without 
regard to antidumping duties.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 
2012).
    \8\ Id., 77 FR 8101, 8102; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice, 
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate POR entries of the subject 
merchandise that Interpipe produced and sold, but did not know it was 
destined for the United States, at the all-others rate (i.e., 23.75 
percent) \9\ if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Order, 86 FR 47055.
    \10\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this 
notice in the

[[Page 13452]]

Federal Register, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 
the cash deposit rate for Interpipe will be equal to the weighted-
average dumping margin listed in the table above; (2) for companies 
that were previously reviewed or investigated in this proceeding that 
are not listed in the table above, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the rate assigned to the company in the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding in which the company was examined; (3) if 
the exporter of the subject merchandise does not have a company-
specific rate but the producer of the subject merchandise does, then 
the cash deposit rate will be the rate assigned to the producer of the 
subject merchandise in the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which the producer was examined; and (4) the cash deposit 
rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-
others rate of 23.75 percent that was established in the less-than-
fair-value investigation in this proceeding.\11\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Order, 84 FR at 47057.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an 
APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results of review in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: March 17, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether to Grant Interpipe a Constructed Export Price 
(CEP) Offset
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Erred in Calculating Indirect 
Selling Expenses
    Comment 3: Whether to Classify Barge Expenses as Movement or CEP 
Expenses
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-04915 Filed 3-21-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.