Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results, 12129-12130 [2025-04092]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices non-subject products. They also remain covered by the scope of this investigation whether imported alone, or in any combination of subject and non-subject merchandise (e.g., a lid or cover of any type packaged with a molded fiber bowl, addition of any items to make the thermoformed molded fiber packaging suitable for end-use such as absorbent pads). When thermoformed molded fiber products are imported in combination with non-subject merchandise, only the thermoformed molded fiber products are subject merchandise. Thermoformed molded fiber products include thermoformed molded fiber products matching the above description that have been finished, packaged, or otherwise processed in a third country by performing finishing, packaging, or processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigations if performed in the country of manufacture of the thermoformed molded fiber products. Examples of finishing, packaging, or other processing in a third country that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigations if performed in the country of manufacture of the thermoformed molded fiber products include, but are not limited to, hot or after pressing, die-cutting, punching, trimming, padding, perforating, printing, labeling, dying, coloring, coating, laminating, embossing, debossing, repacking, or denesting. Thermoformed molded fiber products are classified under subheadings 4823.70.0020 and 4823.70.0040, HTSUS. Imports may also be classified under subheadings 4823.61.20, 4823.61.40, 4823.69.20, 4823.69.40, HTSUS. References to the HTSUS classification are provided for convenience and customs purposes, and the written description of the merchandise under investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 I. Summary II. Background III. Injury Test IV. Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances V. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences VI. Subsidies Valuation Information VII. Interest Rate, Discount Rate, and Land Lease Benchmarks VIII. Analysis of Programs IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2025–04094 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Mar 13, 2025 Jkt 265001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–844] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On February 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22–00202, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) final remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico covering the period November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT’s final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Grupo Simec,1 Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V. (Grupo Acerero), and Sidertul S.A. de C.V. (Sidertul). DATES: Applicable March 10, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Doss, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4474. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On June 8, 2022, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2019–2020 AD administrative review of rebar from Mexico. Commerce found that the 1 Commerce has previously collapsed the following entities into a single entity, collectively, Grupo Simec: Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. (Simec, as in individual entity); Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Compania Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V. (Sigosa); Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Siderúrgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec International, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7 S.A. de C.V.; and Simec International 9 S.A. de C.V. See, e.g., Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 86 FR 50527, 50528 (September 9, 2021). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12129 application of adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), was warranted in determining Grupo Simec’s dumping margin and assigned a dumping margin of 66.70 percent.2 Additionally, Commerce assigned the companies not selected for individual examination, Grupo Acerero and Sidertul, a dumping margin equal to the simple average of the dumping margins for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V., the other mandatory respondent, and Grupo Simec, consistent with the guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.3 Grupo Simec appealed Commerce’s Final Results. On April 25, 2024, the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce to: (1) reopen the record of the administrative review to accept Grupo Simec’s October 18, 2021, filing, and to request other information as needed; (2) conduct a new analysis to determine if the application of AFA is warranted; and (3) re-analyze the nonselected company rate and make any needed adjustments.4 In its final remand redetermination, issued on November 21, 2024, Commerce calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin of 0.00 percent for Grupo Simec.5 In addition, because of the change in Grupo Simec’s calculated margin, the non-selected companies’ rate also changed. As a result, Grupo Acerero and Sidertul are each assigned a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.6 On February 28, 2025, the CIT sustained Commerce’s final redetermination.7 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken,8 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,9 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act, Commerce must publish 2 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 87 FR 34848 (June 8, 2022) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 3 Id. 4 See Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22–00202, Slip Op. 24–52 (CIT April 25, 2024) at 36–37. 5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Grupo Simec v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22–00202, Slip Op. 24–52, dated November 21, 2024, at 27–28. 6 Id. 7 See Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22–00202, Slip Op. 25–21 (CIT February 28, 2025). 8 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 9 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1 12130 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 49 / Friday, March 14, 2025 / Notices a notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s February 28, 2025, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in harmony with Commerce’s Final Results. Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its Final Results with respect to Grupo Simec, Grupo Acerero, and Sidertul as follows: Estimated weighted-average dumping margin (percent) Producer/exporter Grupo Simec (Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V., Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Compania Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Siderúrgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec International, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7 S.A. de C.V.; and Simec International 9 S.A. de C.V.) ....... Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V ......................................................................................................................................................... Sidertul S.A. de C.V .................................................................................................................................................................... Cash Deposit Requirements Because Grupo Simec, Grupo Acerero, and Sidertul each have a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the current cash deposit rate. Liquidation of Suspended Entries At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from liquidating entries that: were produced and/or exported by Grupo Simec,10 produced and exported by Grupo Acerero, produced and/or exported by Sidertul, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period November 1, 2019 through October 31, 2020. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the pendency of any appeals process. In the event the CIT’s ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Grupo Simec, produced and exported by Grupo Acerero, and produced and/or exported by Sidertul, in accordance lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 10 As discussed above, Commerce has previously collapsed multiple entities as Grupo Simec. The Grupo Simec entries enjoined include those produced and/or exported by Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.; Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Compania Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Siderurgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec International, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7 S.A. de C.V.; and Simec International 9 S.A. de C.V. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Mar 13, 2025 Jkt 265001 with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,11 we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: March 10, 2025. Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2025–04092 Filed 3–13–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XE747] New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is scheduling a hybrid meeting of its Scallop Advisory Panel to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). SUMMARY: 11 See PO 00000 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate. DATES: This meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 1, 2024 at 9 a.m. ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at Hilton Garden Inn, Boston Logan, 100 Boardman Street, Boston, MA 02110; telephone: (617) 567–5678. Webinar registration URL information: https://nefmc-org.zoom.us/ meeting/register/vE8-hVPhTuqkGghVYh1Zw. Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cate O’Keefe, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda The Scallop Advisory Panel will meet to review input from the Visioning Sessions and discuss the development of the Long-Term Scallop Strategic Plan. They also plan to review progress on the LAGC IFQ Program Review. Other business will be discussed, if necessary. Although non-emergency issues not contained on the agenda may come before this Council for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. Council action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the MagnusonStevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council’s intent to take final action to address the emergency. The public also should be aware that the meeting will be recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the recording is available upon request. E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 49 (Friday, March 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12129-12130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-04092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-844]


Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Antidumping Administrative 
Review; Notice of Amended Final Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On February 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade 
(CIT) issued its final judgment in Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., Grupo 
Simec S.A.B. de C.V. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22-00202, 
sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) final remand 
results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty 
(AD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico 
covering the period November 1, 2019, through October 31, 2020. 
Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not 
in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, 
and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the 
dumping margin assigned to Grupo Simec,\1\ Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V. 
(Grupo Acerero), and Sidertul S.A. de C.V. (Sidertul).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Commerce has previously collapsed the following entities 
into a single entity, collectively, Grupo Simec: Grupo Simec S.A.B. 
de C.V. (Simec, as in individual entity); Aceros Especiales Simec 
Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Compania Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de 
C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant 
S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V. 
(Sigosa); Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de 
C.V.; RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Sider[uacute]rgicos Noroeste, S.A. de 
C.V.; Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Simec 
International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec International, S.A. de C.V.; 
Simec International 7 S.A. de C.V.; and Simec International 9 S.A. 
de C.V. See, e.g., Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 50527, 50528 
(September 9, 2021).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Applicable March 10, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Doss, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 8, 2022, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2019-
2020 AD administrative review of rebar from Mexico. Commerce found that 
the application of adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to sections 
776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), was 
warranted in determining Grupo Simec's dumping margin and assigned a 
dumping margin of 66.70 percent.\2\ Additionally, Commerce assigned the 
companies not selected for individual examination, Grupo Acerero and 
Sidertul, a dumping margin equal to the simple average of the dumping 
margins for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V., the other mandatory respondent, 
and Grupo Simec, consistent with the guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) 
of the Act.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 87 FR 
34848 (June 8, 2022) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Grupo Simec appealed Commerce's Final Results. On April 25, 2024, 
the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce to: (1) reopen the 
record of the administrative review to accept Grupo Simec's October 18, 
2021, filing, and to request other information as needed; (2) conduct a 
new analysis to determine if the application of AFA is warranted; and 
(3) re-analyze the non-selected company rate and make any needed 
adjustments.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. 
v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22-00202, Slip Op. 24-52 (CIT 
April 25, 2024) at 36-37.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its final remand redetermination, issued on November 21, 2024, 
Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent 
for Grupo Simec.\5\ In addition, because of the change in Grupo Simec's 
calculated margin, the non-selected companies' rate also changed. As a 
result, Grupo Acerero and Sidertul are each assigned a weighted-average 
dumping margin of 0.00 percent in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) 
of the Act.\6\ On February 28, 2025, the CIT sustained Commerce's final 
redetermination.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Grupo Simec v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22-00202, 
Slip Op. 24-52, dated November 21, 2024, at 27-28.
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ See Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. 
v. United States, Consol. Court No. 22-00202, Slip Op. 25-21 (CIT 
February 28, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\8\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\9\ 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant 
to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act, Commerce must publish

[[Page 12130]]

a notice of court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce 
determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a 
``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's February 28, 2025, judgment 
constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in harmony with 
Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment 
of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \9\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending 
its Final Results with respect to Grupo Simec, Grupo Acerero, and 
Sidertul as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Estimated weighted-
                  Producer/exporter                     average dumping
                                                       margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grupo Simec (Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V., Aceros                     0.00
 Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Compania
 Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones
 de Acero Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant
 S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa,
 S.A. de C.V.; Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles
 Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; RRLC S.A.P.I. de
 C.V.; Sider[uacute]rgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.;
 Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. de C.V.;
 Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec
 International, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7
 S.A. de C.V.; and Simec International 9 S.A. de
 C.V.)..............................................
Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V...........................                0.00
Sidertul S.A. de C.V................................                0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Because Grupo Simec, Grupo Acerero, and Sidertul each have a 
superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results 
published in a subsequent administrative review, we will not issue 
revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP). This notice will not affect the current cash deposit rate.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

    At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from 
liquidating entries that: were produced and/or exported by Grupo 
Simec,\10\ produced and exported by Grupo Acerero, produced and/or 
exported by Sidertul, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption during the period November 1, 2019 through October 31, 
2020. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the 
injunction during the pendency of any appeals process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ As discussed above, Commerce has previously collapsed 
multiple entities as Grupo Simec. The Grupo Simec entries enjoined 
include those produced and/or exported by Grupo Simec S.A.B. de 
C.V.; Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Compania 
Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero 
Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora 
de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles 
Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V.; 
Siderurgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgica del Occidente y 
Pacifico S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec 
International, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7 S.A. de C.V.; and 
Simec International 9 S.A. de C.V.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, 
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of 
subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Grupo Simec, produced 
and exported by Grupo Acerero, and produced and/or exported by 
Sidertul, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to 
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not 
zero or de minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate 
is zero or de minimis,\11\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: March 10, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2025-04092 Filed 3-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.