Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for Comment; Female Occupant Anthropometry and Seating, 106741-106744 [2024-30932]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices
Further, because each inconsequential
noncompliance petition must be
evaluated on its own facts and
determinations are highly factdependent, NHTSA does not consider
prior determinations as binding
precedent. Petitioners are reminded that
they have the burden of persuading
NHTSA that the noncompliance is
inconsequential to safety.
In response to the petitioner’s
statement that subject tires that have
remained in dealer inventory for an
extended period would not lead to
confusion on the part of a consumer,
NHTSA notes that noncompliant tires
may not be offered for sale, sold, or
introduced into interstate commerce.
Thus, entities should be aware that
selling noncompliant tires could result
in civil penalties, regardless if the
petition is granted or denied.
NHTSA has evaluated the merits of
the petition submitted by Hercules and
is granting Hercules’ request for relief
from notification and remedy based on
the following:
1. Based on its review of the
information Hercules submitted,
NHTSA has no basis for to believe that
the tires do not meet the performance
and labeling requirements of FMVSS
No. 119, except for the incorrect date
code.
2. While NHTSA recognizes that TIN
labeling errors might prevent consumers
from successfully registering their tires
and this would impact safety, in the
subject petition the noncompliance
would not prevent tire registration. One
purpose of the TIN is to provide a
means of identifying tires, and while the
date code portion of the TIN is useful
to identifying tires, it also provides
information to consumers about the age
of their tires which could be safety
related. In this specific instance, where
the numbers two and eight were
interchanged in the date code, the
agency believes that consumers will
recognize that the code is an error. It is
unlikely that a reasonable person will
believe that the tires were manufactured
in 1980. Therefore, NHTSA does not
believe the incorrect date code will
cause consumers to use the tire beyond
its recommended service life, but rather
recognize that there is an error in the
date code portion of the TIN.
3. NHTSA believes that the
manufacturer has taken sufficient steps
to ensure that the affected tires are
included in future recalls by:
poses an unreasonable risk when it ‘‘results in
hazards as potentially dangerous as sudden engine
fire, and where there is no dispute that at least some
such hazards, in this case fires, can definitely be
expected to occur in the future’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:58 Dec 27, 2024
Jkt 265001
a. Verifying that the tires having the
incorrect date code may be registered
using their tire registration system.
b. Ensuring that their registration
database will correctly identify the tires
as having been produced in week 48 of
2020, when the date code 4280 is
entered.
VII. NHTSA’s Decision: In
consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA
finds that Hercules has met its burden
of persuasion that the subject FMVSS
No. 119 noncompliance in the affected
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety. Accordingly, Hercules’s petition
is hereby granted and Hercules is
consequently exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a free remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject tires
that Hercules no longer controlled at the
time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve
tire distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their
control after they were notified that the
subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Eileen Sullivan,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2024–30951 Filed 12–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2024–0056]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; Female Occupant
Anthropometry and Seating
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00336
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
106741
Notice and request for
comments on a request for approval of
a new information collection.
ACTION:
NHTSA invites public
comments about our intention to request
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for a new
information collection. Before a Federal
agency can collect certain information
from the public, it must receive
approval from OMB. Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB
approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed
collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of
previously approved collections. This
document describes a collection of
information for which NHTSA intends
to seek OMB approval on Occupant
Anthropometry and Seating.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before February 28, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the Docket No. NHTSA–
2024–0056 through any of the following
methods:
• Electronic submissions: Go to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket
Management, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To
be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 366–9322 before
coming.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
106742
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices
instructions for accessing the dockets
via internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact
Elizabeth Lafferty, Office of Vehicle
Safety Research, Human Injury Research
Division NSR–220, West Building,
W46–311, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE,
Washington, DC 20590; Email:
Elizabeth.lafferty@dot.gov; Phone: 202–
366–6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency
submits a proposed collection of
information to OMB for approval, it
must first publish a document in the
Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulation (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) how to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) how to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses. In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collection of information for which the
agency is seeking approval from OMB.
Title: Occupant Anthropometry and
Seating.
OMB Control Number: New.
Form Number(s): NHTSA Form 1824,
NHTSA Form 1825, NHTSA Form 1826,
NHTSA Form 1827, NHTSA Form 1828,
and NHTSA Form 1848.
Type of Request: New information
collection.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information:
NHTSA proposes to collect
information from the public as part of a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:58 Dec 27, 2024
Jkt 265001
study to collect detailed information on
current body size and shape, posture,
and motion of vehicle occupants. This
research will support NHTSA in the
development of tools used for occupant
protection during crashes, particularly
in the context of equity in
crashworthiness. This research will add
to the body of knowledge and is not
immediately intended to inform
regulations or policy.
The designs of anthropomorphic test
devices (ATDs, commonly known as
crash test dummies) are based on
measurements of volunteers sitting in
vehicle and laboratory seats. The
current generation of ATDs is based on
data gathered at University of Michigan
Transportation Research Institute
(UMTRI) in the 1980s. Since that time,
the U.S. population has change
substantially, most notably due to the
large increase in body mass.
Measurement technologies have also
improved dramatically with the
development of fast three-dimensional
surface measurement systems. Seating
configurations have also expanded from
the traditional seat posture collected in
the 1980s with increased recline angles
in modern vehicles. This combination of
a population size shift and more
variable seat configurations presents a
clear need for updated seated
anthropometry to be collected with new
advanced anthropometry measurement
capabilities.
The data collections, approved by the
Institutional Review Board at the
University of Michigan, will be
performed once to obtain the target
number of valid test participants. Study
participants will be male and female
licensed adult drivers from the general
public, and participation will be
voluntary with monetary compensation
provided. Participants are recruited
using University of Michigan’s Health
Research portal, https://
umhealthresearch.org/. The voluntary
study would involve recruiting licensed
drivers for two studies (in-lab and invehicle). For the in-lab study, the
following information collections
include: (1) an online screening
questionnaire; (2) an eligibility phone
call to confirm eligibility, interest, and
schedule a time in the lab; (3) informed
consent for the in-lab study and
anthropometric measurement. A subset
of the in-lab participants will be asked
to participate in the in-vehicle study
and the following information
collections include: (1) a pre-drive
questionnaire for the in-vehicle study;
(5) informed consent and
anthropometric measurements for the
in-vehicle study; and (6) a post-drive
questionnaire for the in-vehicle study.
PO 00000
Frm 00337
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In this study, 3D surface scan data
quantifying body size and shape in a
range of postures will be obtained.
Posture, position, and belt fit in driver
and passenger seating mockups that are
adjusted to a wide range of vehicle
configurations and using multiple seats
will be measured. The participants will
be selected to span a wide range of
stature and weight, spanning the 5th
percentile female to 95th percentile
male values. Individuals with high body
mass will be preferentially selected to
address the current lack of data from
that cohort. An in-vehicle study will be
conducted using participants recruited
from among those participating in the
laboratory study. Participants will be
provided an instrumented vehicle to
drive in place of their own for a 7-to-10day period. Given unknown budget
appropriations the drive time may be
reduced from 7-to-10-days to two hours.
Independent of budget appropriations
the burden to the public is two hours.
The two hours will either be spent as
more detailed check in/check out time
for the 7-to-10-day plus questionnaire
post-drive or as a 2-hr drive starting and
ending at the lab. The goal of the invehicle study is to validate the driver
postures measured in the laboratory and
to obtain high-resolution 3D data on
postures and movements during driving.
A particular focus is on the lower
extremities, where crash injury data
have indicated a large difference in risk
between male and female drivers. Body
scans, measurements, and any video
will be de-identified prior to submission
to NHTSA. Statistical models will also
be developed from de-identified data
and made available to the public
through a software tool.
This research study will gather a new
database of information on adult body
size, shape, posture, and motion to
support advancement in these safety
applications. This study will add to the
body of the knowledge on motor vehicle
anthropometry and will support female
crash safety and equitable occupant
protection through the development of
human body models (HBMs) and
anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs).
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information:
Early ATDs, including the Hybrid-III
family that was initially designed in the
1970s, were constructed using manually
gathered anthropometric data, such as
segment lengths and circumferences.
Minimal 3D information was available,
and seated postures were approximated.
In 1980, NHTSA funded a large-scale
study at UMTRI to develop
anthropometric specifications for a new
generation of ATDs. The Anthropometry
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices
of Motor Vehicle Occupants (AMVO)
study gathered data and developed
detailed 3D body shapes for small
female, midsize male, and large male
occupants, using 5th percentile female,
50th percentile male, and 95th
percentile male stature and body weight
as the target reference values. Drawing
packages were developed detailing
landmark and joint locations, and
physical 3D surface shells were
constructed using landmark data and
minimal 3D contour information. These
data have formed the anthropometric
basis for most adult ATDs developed
since that time, including the THOR
family.
AMVO had some limitations,
however. Due to the limits of the
technology available at the time, a small
number of participants were measured
(25 per size bin were used to create the
final specifications), and no 3D surface
information was collected. Moreover,
the analysis was based on simple
averaging per size bins, so no
information was provided for other
occupant sizes. Most importantly, the
midsize female was dropped for cost
reasons, so the only female data were
gathered from very small individuals.
Over the past 20 years, HBMs have
become an important addition to the
biomechanics toolkit. Using the same
logic that was applied to selecting body
sizes for ATDs, the HBMs have typically
been targeted to the same stature and
body weight reference values as were
used in AMVO. However, unlike the
averaging process used in AMVO, most
HBMs have developed using data
primarily or entirely from a single
individual. A consequence of this
approach is that HBM development has
not provided meaningful additions to
the anthropometric data available to
characterize vehicle occupants.
In the decades since AMVO, UMTRI
has conducted a large number of studies
of occupant posture and body shape and
has developed advancements in both
measurement and analysis
methodology. Of particular importance,
rather than averaging data to create a
representation of a single body size,
UMTRI has developed continuous
statistical models that can generate
accurate specifications for a wide range
of sizes and shapes (for examples, see
https://HumanShape.org).
Simultaneously analyzing both
landmark locations and 3D body shapes
has enabled the development of
parametric human body modeling, in
which HBMs are morphed to represent
people with widely varying size and
shape.
Concurrent with the development of
parametric HBMs, crash injury data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:58 Dec 27, 2024
Jkt 265001
analyses have highlighted the potential
benefits of these new tools. In
particular, the field data indicate that
female occupants experience higher
risks of some injuries in certain types of
crashes. Notably, lower-extremity injury
risks are markedly higher for female
drivers than for male drivers in frontal
impacts. Detailed anthropometric and
posture data for female drivers could
help to elucidate the causes of this
difference. Crash injury data also show
that individuals with high body mass
are at higher risks of some injuries,
possibly due to differences in the
interaction with the restraint systems.
Minimal data are available to describe
the seated postures and body shapes of
this cohort, which is increasingly
important in the U.S.
Affected Public:
Respondents will be licensed drivers,
ages 18+, in the Ann Arbor, MI region
and willing to travel to UMTRI. Study
participants will be male and female
licensed adult drivers from the general
public, and participation will be
voluntary with monetary compensation
provided. Participants are recruited
using University of Michigan’s Health
Research portal, https://
umhealthresearch.org/. Prospective
participants will respond to the U–M
Health Research posting by completing
a screening questionnaire on a Google
Form. Eligible participants are those
whose answers to the Google Form
questions are consistent with the
inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Eligibility requirements include the
ability to read and speak English, ability
to drive for two hours continuously,
hold a current and unrestricted U.S.
driver’s license, have been a licensed
driver for at least one year, drive a car
daily for an average of at least 15
minutes, and comfortable driving on the
highway and local roads. Exclusion
criteria include individuals with
musculoskeletal ailments impeding the
ability to walk or sit comfortably or
musculoskeletal deformities such as
scoliosis or amputations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2000.
We estimate that 2000 screening
questionnaires will be filled out to
obtain the needed number of subjects.
The form has 23 questions, including
name, address, and time slots available.
We estimate that up to 600 individuals
will need to be contacted to obtain the
needed number of 300 subjects for the
lab study. This considers that some
people’s schedules may not match up
with lab openings or they may not show
up for their scheduled appointment. A
subset of the in-lab study participants
will be asked to participate in the in-
PO 00000
Frm 00338
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
106743
vehicle study with the targeted 100
participants.
Frequency: Once.
This is a one-time collection of
information with two studies: in-lab and
in-vehicle. A subset of the in-lab
participants will be asked to participate
in the in-vehicle study. The initial prescreening time is roughly 5 minutes and
can be done at the respondents’
convenience using a device of their
choosing. The only requirement is an
internet connection to access the online
pre-screening. Not all who begin this
pre-screening will complete the form in
its entirety, and not everyone will meet
study criteria. Those who meet study
criteria could be contacted for an
eligibility phone call prior to study
enrollment.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours:
The annual estimated time burden to
complete the collection of information
is 347 hours and an annual opportunity
cost of $16,373.05 over the study period.
To minimize the burden of the
screening questionnaire and eligibility
phone call, individuals for the invehicle study will be selected from the
in-lab study pool. An estimate of up to
2000 individuals will initiate a response
to the online screening questionnaire
due to the broad range of inclusion
criteria. Of the screened individuals we
anticipate that up to 600 will need to be
contacted for an eligibility phone call to
obtain the needed number of 300
participants scheduled for the in-lab
study. Scheduled participants that do
not show up will be replaced from the
remaining pool of screened participants
and eligibility phone call to ensure 300
individuals arrive for in-lab
measurements. After completion of the
2-hour process for informed consented
and in-lab data collection, some
participants will be asked if they are
interested in the in-vehicle study. From
the 300 in-lab participants, 100 will be
scheduled to return to the lab for the invehicle study. The in-vehicle pre-drive
and post-drive questionnaires will each
take 5 mins, the informed consent,
vehicle check-out, and vehicle check-in
processes will take 110 min. totaling 2
hrs. for all of the in-vehicle study.
To calculate the opportunity cost
associated with the forms and other
relevant activities necessary for this
collection of new information, NHTSA
looked at average hourly earnings for
employees across all occupations in the
Ann Arbor, MI area. The Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS) estimates that the
average hourly wage for this group is
$33.43, thus serving as the opportunity
cost per hour. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics estimates that private industry
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
106744
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices
workers’ wages represent 70.3% of total
labor compensation costs. Therefore,
NHTSA estimates the hourly labor costs
to be $47.55. NHTSA estimates the total
opportunity cost associated with the
1033 burden hours to be $49,119.15.
Annual burden cost is estimated to be
$16,373.05, and annual burden hours is
estimated to be 347. There may be a
slight variation in the comparison of
total to annual burden over the three
years due to rounding. The annual
burden figures will be those represented
in ROCIS.
TABLE 1—BURDEN ESTIMATES
NHSTA
form
No.
1824
1825
1826
1827
Number of
respondents
total/annual
Information collection
Cost per response
Frequency of
response
Burden hours
total/annual
Burden cost (dollars)
total/annual
....
....
....
....
Online Screening questionnaire ...............
Eligibility Phone Call ................................
Informed Consent, In-Lab ........................
In-Vehicle Pre-Drive Questionnaire .........
2000/667
600/200
300/100
100/34
5
5
120
5
$3.96
3.96
95.10
3.96
1
1
1
1
167/56
50/17
600/200
8/3
$7,940.85/$2,646.95
2,377.50/792.50
28,530.00/9,510.00
380.40/126.80
1828 ....
1848 ....
Informed Consent, In-Vehicle ..................
In-Vehicle Post-Drive Questionnaire ........
Total Burden/Annual Burden ....................
100/34
100/34
........................
120
5
........................
95.10
3.96
........................
1
1
........................
200/68
8/3
1033/347
9,510.00/3,170.00
380.40/126.80
49,119.15/16,373.05
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
NHTSA estimates that the total travel
costs to all respondents will be no more
than $10,720. The total estimated cost to
the Government for this one-time
information collection is $49,119.15
plus $10,720 totaling $59,839.15 where
the annual estimated cost is $19,946.38.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspects of this
information collection, including (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Department’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29A.
Cem Hatipoglu,
Associate Administrator, Vehicle Safety
Research.
[FR Doc. 2024–30932 Filed 12–27–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Time per
response
(min)
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2024–0005]
Pipeline Safety: Meeting of the Liquid
and Gas Pipeline Advisory
Committees.
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:58 Dec 27, 2024
Jkt 265001
(PHMSA); Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of advisory committee
meeting.
This notice announces a
public meeting of the Technical
Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety
Standards Committee, also known as the
Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee
(LPAC), and the Technical Pipeline
Safety Standards Committee, also
known as the Gas Pipeline Advisory
Committee (GPAC), to discuss the
notices of proposed rulemaking
(NPRMs) titled ‘‘Periodic Standards
Update II’’ and ‘‘Cost Recovery for
Siting Reviews for LNG Facilities.’’
DATES: PHMSA will hold a public
meeting on Thursday, January 16, 2025.
The LPAC and GPAC (Committees) will
meet from 10:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST
to discuss the NPRMs. However, the
meeting may end early or late
depending on when the Committees
complete their review of the proposed
rules. Members of the public who wish
to attend are asked to register no later
than January 2, 2025. PHMSA requests
that individuals who require
accommodations because of a disability
notify Joe Berry by email at
joseph.berry1@dot.gov at least five days
prior to the meeting. Public comments
on the proceedings of this meeting must
be submitted by February 20, 2025.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held
virtually. The agenda and any
additional information, including
information on how to participate in the
meeting, will be published on the
meeting website at Liquid Pipeline
Advisory Committee (LPAC) and Gas
Pipeline Advisory Committee (GPAC)
Meeting—PHMSA Public Meetings.
Presentations will be available on the
meeting website and at https://
www.regulations.gov in docket number
PHMSA–2024–0005 no later than 30
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00339
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
days following the meeting. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
No. PHMSA–2024–0005, by any of the
following methods:
• Web: https://www.regulations.gov.
This site allows the public to enter
comments on any Federal Register
notice issued by any agency. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building:
Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building: Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590–0001,
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. EST,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays.
• Instructions: Identify Docket No.
PHMSA–2024–0179 at the beginning of
your comments. If you submit your
comments by mail, submit two copies.
Internet users may submit comments at
https://www.regulations.gov. If you
would like confirmation that PHMSA
received your comments, please include
a self-addressed stamped postcard
labeled ‘‘Comments on PHMSA–2024–
0005.’’ The docket clerk will date stamp
the postcard prior to returning it to you
via U.S. mail.
• Note: All comments received will
be posted without edits to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading for more
information. Anyone can use the site to
search all comments by the name of the
submitting individual or, if the
comment was submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.,
the name of the signing individual.
Therefore, please review the complete
DOT Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register at 65 FR 19477 or the
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 106741-106744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2024-0056]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Notice and Request for
Comment; Female Occupant Anthropometry and Seating
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a request for approval of a
new information collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public comments about our intention to request
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a new
information collection. Before a Federal agency can collect certain
information from the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under
procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before
seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on
proposed collections of information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved collections. This document
describes a collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek
OMB approval on Occupant Anthropometry and Seating.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 28, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Docket No. NHTSA-
2024-0056 through any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help
you, please call (202) 366-9322 before coming.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
[[Page 106742]]
instructions for accessing the dockets via internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access
to background documents, contact Elizabeth Lafferty, Office of Vehicle
Safety Research, Human Injury Research Division NSR-220, West Building,
W46-311, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; Email:
[email protected]; Phone: 202-366-6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies
concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must
ask for public comment on the following: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) how to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA
asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of
information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
Title: Occupant Anthropometry and Seating.
OMB Control Number: New.
Form Number(s): NHTSA Form 1824, NHTSA Form 1825, NHTSA Form 1826,
NHTSA Form 1827, NHTSA Form 1828, and NHTSA Form 1848.
Type of Request: New information collection.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information:
NHTSA proposes to collect information from the public as part of a
study to collect detailed information on current body size and shape,
posture, and motion of vehicle occupants. This research will support
NHTSA in the development of tools used for occupant protection during
crashes, particularly in the context of equity in crashworthiness. This
research will add to the body of knowledge and is not immediately
intended to inform regulations or policy.
The designs of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs, commonly known
as crash test dummies) are based on measurements of volunteers sitting
in vehicle and laboratory seats. The current generation of ATDs is
based on data gathered at University of Michigan Transportation
Research Institute (UMTRI) in the 1980s. Since that time, the U.S.
population has change substantially, most notably due to the large
increase in body mass. Measurement technologies have also improved
dramatically with the development of fast three-dimensional surface
measurement systems. Seating configurations have also expanded from the
traditional seat posture collected in the 1980s with increased recline
angles in modern vehicles. This combination of a population size shift
and more variable seat configurations presents a clear need for updated
seated anthropometry to be collected with new advanced anthropometry
measurement capabilities.
The data collections, approved by the Institutional Review Board at
the University of Michigan, will be performed once to obtain the target
number of valid test participants. Study participants will be male and
female licensed adult drivers from the general public, and
participation will be voluntary with monetary compensation provided.
Participants are recruited using University of Michigan's Health
Research portal, https://umhealthresearch.org/. The voluntary study
would involve recruiting licensed drivers for two studies (in-lab and
in-vehicle). For the in-lab study, the following information
collections include: (1) an online screening questionnaire; (2) an
eligibility phone call to confirm eligibility, interest, and schedule a
time in the lab; (3) informed consent for the in-lab study and
anthropometric measurement. A subset of the in-lab participants will be
asked to participate in the in-vehicle study and the following
information collections include: (1) a pre-drive questionnaire for the
in-vehicle study; (5) informed consent and anthropometric measurements
for the in-vehicle study; and (6) a post-drive questionnaire for the
in-vehicle study.
In this study, 3D surface scan data quantifying body size and shape
in a range of postures will be obtained. Posture, position, and belt
fit in driver and passenger seating mockups that are adjusted to a wide
range of vehicle configurations and using multiple seats will be
measured. The participants will be selected to span a wide range of
stature and weight, spanning the 5th percentile female to 95th
percentile male values. Individuals with high body mass will be
preferentially selected to address the current lack of data from that
cohort. An in-vehicle study will be conducted using participants
recruited from among those participating in the laboratory study.
Participants will be provided an instrumented vehicle to drive in place
of their own for a 7-to-10-day period. Given unknown budget
appropriations the drive time may be reduced from 7-to-10-days to two
hours. Independent of budget appropriations the burden to the public is
two hours. The two hours will either be spent as more detailed check
in/check out time for the 7-to-10-day plus questionnaire post-drive or
as a 2-hr drive starting and ending at the lab. The goal of the in-
vehicle study is to validate the driver postures measured in the
laboratory and to obtain high-resolution 3D data on postures and
movements during driving. A particular focus is on the lower
extremities, where crash injury data have indicated a large difference
in risk between male and female drivers. Body scans, measurements, and
any video will be de-identified prior to submission to NHTSA.
Statistical models will also be developed from de-identified data and
made available to the public through a software tool.
This research study will gather a new database of information on
adult body size, shape, posture, and motion to support advancement in
these safety applications. This study will add to the body of the
knowledge on motor vehicle anthropometry and will support female crash
safety and equitable occupant protection through the development of
human body models (HBMs) and anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs).
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information:
Early ATDs, including the Hybrid-III family that was initially
designed in the 1970s, were constructed using manually gathered
anthropometric data, such as segment lengths and circumferences.
Minimal 3D information was available, and seated postures were
approximated. In 1980, NHTSA funded a large-scale study at UMTRI to
develop anthropometric specifications for a new generation of ATDs. The
Anthropometry
[[Page 106743]]
of Motor Vehicle Occupants (AMVO) study gathered data and developed
detailed 3D body shapes for small female, midsize male, and large male
occupants, using 5th percentile female, 50th percentile male, and 95th
percentile male stature and body weight as the target reference values.
Drawing packages were developed detailing landmark and joint locations,
and physical 3D surface shells were constructed using landmark data and
minimal 3D contour information. These data have formed the
anthropometric basis for most adult ATDs developed since that time,
including the THOR family.
AMVO had some limitations, however. Due to the limits of the
technology available at the time, a small number of participants were
measured (25 per size bin were used to create the final
specifications), and no 3D surface information was collected. Moreover,
the analysis was based on simple averaging per size bins, so no
information was provided for other occupant sizes. Most importantly,
the midsize female was dropped for cost reasons, so the only female
data were gathered from very small individuals.
Over the past 20 years, HBMs have become an important addition to
the biomechanics toolkit. Using the same logic that was applied to
selecting body sizes for ATDs, the HBMs have typically been targeted to
the same stature and body weight reference values as were used in AMVO.
However, unlike the averaging process used in AMVO, most HBMs have
developed using data primarily or entirely from a single individual. A
consequence of this approach is that HBM development has not provided
meaningful additions to the anthropometric data available to
characterize vehicle occupants.
In the decades since AMVO, UMTRI has conducted a large number of
studies of occupant posture and body shape and has developed
advancements in both measurement and analysis methodology. Of
particular importance, rather than averaging data to create a
representation of a single body size, UMTRI has developed continuous
statistical models that can generate accurate specifications for a wide
range of sizes and shapes (for examples, see https://HumanShape.org).
Simultaneously analyzing both landmark locations and 3D body shapes has
enabled the development of parametric human body modeling, in which
HBMs are morphed to represent people with widely varying size and
shape.
Concurrent with the development of parametric HBMs, crash injury
data analyses have highlighted the potential benefits of these new
tools. In particular, the field data indicate that female occupants
experience higher risks of some injuries in certain types of crashes.
Notably, lower-extremity injury risks are markedly higher for female
drivers than for male drivers in frontal impacts. Detailed
anthropometric and posture data for female drivers could help to
elucidate the causes of this difference. Crash injury data also show
that individuals with high body mass are at higher risks of some
injuries, possibly due to differences in the interaction with the
restraint systems. Minimal data are available to describe the seated
postures and body shapes of this cohort, which is increasingly
important in the U.S.
Affected Public:
Respondents will be licensed drivers, ages 18+, in the Ann Arbor,
MI region and willing to travel to UMTRI. Study participants will be
male and female licensed adult drivers from the general public, and
participation will be voluntary with monetary compensation provided.
Participants are recruited using University of Michigan's Health
Research portal, https://umhealthresearch.org/. Prospective
participants will respond to the U-M Health Research posting by
completing a screening questionnaire on a Google Form. Eligible
participants are those whose answers to the Google Form questions are
consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Eligibility requirements include the ability to read and speak
English, ability to drive for two hours continuously, hold a current
and unrestricted U.S. driver's license, have been a licensed driver for
at least one year, drive a car daily for an average of at least 15
minutes, and comfortable driving on the highway and local roads.
Exclusion criteria include individuals with musculoskeletal ailments
impeding the ability to walk or sit comfortably or musculoskeletal
deformities such as scoliosis or amputations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2000.
We estimate that 2000 screening questionnaires will be filled out
to obtain the needed number of subjects. The form has 23 questions,
including name, address, and time slots available. We estimate that up
to 600 individuals will need to be contacted to obtain the needed
number of 300 subjects for the lab study. This considers that some
people's schedules may not match up with lab openings or they may not
show up for their scheduled appointment. A subset of the in-lab study
participants will be asked to participate in the in-vehicle study with
the targeted 100 participants.
Frequency: Once.
This is a one-time collection of information with two studies: in-
lab and in-vehicle. A subset of the in-lab participants will be asked
to participate in the in-vehicle study. The initial pre-screening time
is roughly 5 minutes and can be done at the respondents' convenience
using a device of their choosing. The only requirement is an internet
connection to access the online pre-screening. Not all who begin this
pre-screening will complete the form in its entirety, and not everyone
will meet study criteria. Those who meet study criteria could be
contacted for an eligibility phone call prior to study enrollment.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:
The annual estimated time burden to complete the collection of
information is 347 hours and an annual opportunity cost of $16,373.05
over the study period. To minimize the burden of the screening
questionnaire and eligibility phone call, individuals for the in-
vehicle study will be selected from the in-lab study pool. An estimate
of up to 2000 individuals will initiate a response to the online
screening questionnaire due to the broad range of inclusion criteria.
Of the screened individuals we anticipate that up to 600 will need to
be contacted for an eligibility phone call to obtain the needed number
of 300 participants scheduled for the in-lab study. Scheduled
participants that do not show up will be replaced from the remaining
pool of screened participants and eligibility phone call to ensure 300
individuals arrive for in-lab measurements. After completion of the 2-
hour process for informed consented and in-lab data collection, some
participants will be asked if they are interested in the in-vehicle
study. From the 300 in-lab participants, 100 will be scheduled to
return to the lab for the in-vehicle study. The in-vehicle pre-drive
and post-drive questionnaires will each take 5 mins, the informed
consent, vehicle check-out, and vehicle check-in processes will take
110 min. totaling 2 hrs. for all of the in-vehicle study.
To calculate the opportunity cost associated with the forms and
other relevant activities necessary for this collection of new
information, NHTSA looked at average hourly earnings for employees
across all occupations in the Ann Arbor, MI area. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) estimates that the average hourly wage for this group
is $33.43, thus serving as the opportunity cost per hour. The Bureau of
Labor Statistics estimates that private industry
[[Page 106744]]
workers' wages represent 70.3% of total labor compensation costs.
Therefore, NHTSA estimates the hourly labor costs to be $47.55. NHTSA
estimates the total opportunity cost associated with the 1033 burden
hours to be $49,119.15. Annual burden cost is estimated to be
$16,373.05, and annual burden hours is estimated to be 347. There may
be a slight variation in the comparison of total to annual burden over
the three years due to rounding. The annual burden figures will be
those represented in ROCIS.
Table 1--Burden Estimates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Time per
NHSTA form No. Information collection respondents response Cost per Frequency of Burden hours Burden cost (dollars)
total/annual (min) response response total/annual total/annual
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1824............... Online Screening 2000/667 5 $3.96 1 167/56 $7,940.85/$2,646.95
questionnaire.
1825............... Eligibility Phone Call.... 600/200 5 3.96 1 50/17 2,377.50/792.50
1826............... Informed Consent, In-Lab.. 300/100 120 95.10 1 600/200 28,530.00/9,510.00
1827............... In-Vehicle Pre-Drive 100/34 5 3.96 1 8/3 380.40/126.80
Questionnaire.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1828............... Informed Consent, In- 100/34 120 95.10 1 200/68 9,510.00/3,170.00
Vehicle.
1848............... In-Vehicle Post-Drive 100/34 5 3.96 1 8/3 380.40/126.80
Questionnaire.
Total Burden/Annual Burden .............. .............. .............. .............. 1033/347 49,119.15/16,373.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
NHTSA estimates that the total travel costs to all respondents will
be no more than $10,720. The total estimated cost to the Government for
this one-time information collection is $49,119.15 plus $10,720
totaling $59,839.15 where the annual estimated cost is $19,946.38.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate
of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29A.
Cem Hatipoglu,
Associate Administrator, Vehicle Safety Research.
[FR Doc. 2024-30932 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P