Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, 104279-104281 [2024-30349]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices available to be issued financial statements in the home jurisdiction. Under this Order, the Covered Entity must notify the Commission in a memorandum field accompanying the FOCUS Report the GAAP it uses to present the financial information in the filing.23 vii. Follow FOCUS Report Instructions Unless Inconsistent With This Order Finally, as discussed in the 2021 Manner and Format Order, the Covered Entity must follow the instructions for completing the FOCUS Report Part II or Part IIC, as applicable, to the extent the instructions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Order.24 This includes presenting information in U.S. dollars (not in local currencies).25 However, a prudentially regulated Covered Entity filing the FOCUS Report Part IIC need not follow instructions referring to line items on the Call Report to the extent the Covered Entity does not report the required information in a Call Report pursuant to that instruction.26 IV. Conclusion ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 It Is hereby ordered that a Covered Entity must meet the manner and format condition in a Commission order granting conditional substituted compliance with respect to Exchange Act Rule 18a–7 by: (a)(1) If not prudentially regulated, filing through the SEC eFOCUS system a FOCUS Report Part II 35 calendar days after the end of each month; or (2) If prudentially regulated, filing through the SEC eFOCUS system the FOCUS Report Part IIC 35 calendar days after the end of each quarter; (b)(1) If not prudentially regulated, entering the required information on the line items (as applicable) highlighted on the FOCUS Report Part II, as specified on the Commission’s website, on the FOCUS Report Part II filed pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) above; or 23 See paragraph (e) of the ordering language below. In particular, the Covered Entity needs to report this information in the memorandum field for line item 12003 or 12004 (as applicable) of the FOCUS Report Part II if not prudentially regulated or line item 12820 or 12821 (as applicable) of the FOCUS Report Part IIC if prudentially regulated. 24 See paragraph (f) of the ordering language below. 25 Covered Entities may convert local currencies at a ‘‘top-line’’ level to U.S. dollars at the spot rate applicable on the ‘‘as of’’ date of the reported amount. 26 If the Covered Entity files a Call Report in the U.S. with a prudential regulator pursuant to the instructions for the Call Report, it should follow the instructions in the FOCUS Report Part IIC to report information in that report to the extent the same information is reported by the Covered Entity in the Call Report. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:12 Dec 19, 2024 Jkt 265001 (2) If prudentially regulated, entering the required information on the line items (as applicable) highlighted on the FOCUS Report Part IIC, as specified on the Commission’s website, on the FOCUS Report Part IIC filed pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) above; (c) Presenting the information in the FOCUS Report Part II or Part IIC (as applicable) filed pursuant to paragraph (a) above at the entity level of the Covered Entity on the same basis (consolidated or unconsolidated) that the Covered Entity presents information in the financial reports it files in its home jurisdiction; (d) Completing the Regulatory Capital section of the FOCUS Report Part IIC and presenting the information in that section in accordance with the reporting requirements of the Covered Entity’s home jurisdiction; (e) Identifying the generally accepted accounting principles being used to present the information in the FOCUS Report Part II or Part IIC (as applicable) filed pursuant to paragraph (a) above in the memo field for line item 12003, 12004, 12820, or 12821 (as applicable) of the report in the SEC eFOCUS system; and (f) Reporting the information in the FOCUS Report Part II or Part IIC (as applicable) filed pursuant to paragraph (a) above in accordance with the instructions for those reports; except that the Covered Entity can report the information: (1) In a manner consistent with a condition of this Order, if the instruction conflicts with the condition; or (2) In a manner consistent with the requirements of its home jurisdiction, if the instruction on the FOCUS Report Part IIC requires information submitted on the Call Report and the Covered Entity does not report the required information on a Call Report. By the Commission. Dated: December 16, 2024. Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–30377 Filed 12–19–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P PO 00000 104279 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–101920; File No. SR– NYSEAMER–2024–77] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule December 16, 2024. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on December 11, 2024, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) regarding the charges applicable to Manual transactions by NYSE American Options Market Makers. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective December 11, 2024.4 The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 4 The Exchange previously filed to amend the Fee Schedule on November 29, 2024 (SR–NYSEAMER– 2024–74), for December 2, 2024 effectiveness, and withdrew such filing on December 11, 2024. 2 15 Frm 00208 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM 20DEN1 104280 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing is to modify Section I.A. of the Fee Schedule regarding the fee for Manual transactions by NYSE American Options Market Makers (‘‘Market Makers’’). Currently, Market Makers are charged $0.35 per contract for Manual transactions. The Exchange proposes to increase the fee for Market Makers’ Manual transactions to $0.50 per contract.5 The proposed change is intended to more closely align the Exchange’s fee for Manual transactions by Market Makers with fees charged by at least one other competing exchange.6 Although the proposed change would increase the fee for Manual transactions for Market Makers, the Exchange believes Market Makers will continue to quote actively to participate in transactions on the Trading Floor as they do today, thereby promoting trading opportunities and competition on the Trading Floor to the benefit of all market participants. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,8 in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The proposed change is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to significant competitive forces in the market for options securities transaction services that constrain its pricing determinations in that market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market 5 See Fee Schedule, Section I.A. (Rates for Options transactions). 6 See Nasdaq PHLX, Options 7 Pricing Schedule, Section 4 (providing for $0.50 per contract fee for Market Maker manual transactions). 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:12 Dec 19, 2024 Jkt 265001 system ‘‘has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.’’ 9 There are currently 18 registered options exchanges competing for order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.10 Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity & ETF options order flow. More specifically, in October 2024, the Exchange had 6.26% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.11 In such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single options exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of option order flow. Within this environment, market participants can freely and often do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues in response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. The Exchange believes the proposed change is reasonable because, although it would increase the fee for Market Maker Manual transactions, it is designed to bring the Exchange’s fee closer into alignment with a similar fee charged on at least one other competing exchange with a trading floor.12 In addition, although Market Makers would continue to be subject to a Manual transaction fee greater than those charged to other market participants, the proposed fee is reasonable, on balance, given various other incentives available only to Market Makers.13 The Exchange also believes the proposed change, although it would increase the fee applicable to Market Makers’ Manual transactions, would not discourage Market Makers from conducting Manual transactions on 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’). 10 The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, available here: https:// www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics. 11 Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see id., the Exchange’s market share in multiply-listed equity and ETF options decreased slightly from 6.45% for the month of October 2023 to 6.26% for the month of October 2024. 12 See note 6, supra. 13 See, e.g., Fee Schedule, Sections I.C. (NYSE American Options Market Maker Sliding Scale— Electronic) and I.D. (Prepayment Program). PO 00000 Frm 00209 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the Exchange, thereby continuing to attract volume and liquidity to the Exchange generally and to the benefit all market participants (including those that do not participate in Manual transactions) through increased opportunities to trade. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable allocation of its fees and credits and is not unfairly discriminatory, as it applies equally to all similarly-situated market participants on an equal and nondiscriminatory basis. The proposal is based on the type of business transacted on the Exchange, and Market Makers are not obligated to engage in Manual transactions. Market Makers benefit from having access to interact with orders that are made available in open outcry on the Trading Floor, and the Exchange believes that the proposed increased fee for Market Makers’ Manual transactions is designed to balance the need to attract both Market Makers’ and other market participants’ orders to the Trading Floor. Although the proposed change would increase the fee for Market Makers’ Manual transactions, the Exchange believes Market Makers would continue to quote actively so that they may participate in Manual transactions as they do today, thereby promoting competition and maintaining market quality for all market participants. The Exchange also believes that increasing fees for Manual transactions by Market Makers, but not for other market participants, represents an equitable, non-discriminatory allocation of fees on balance because Market Makers continue to be entitled to various incentives not available to other market participants.14 Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange’s statement regarding the burden on competition. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposed change would be consistent with charges for similar business on at least one other market. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change furthers the Commission’s goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, 14 See E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM id. 20DEN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.’’ 15 Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to continue to promote the use of the Exchange as a primary trading venue, and, specifically, to encourage competition on the Trading Floor. The proposed change is designed to balance the need to attract both Market Makers’ and other market participants’ orders to the Trading Floor. The Exchange believes that the proposed change to the fee applicable to Manual transactions by Market Makers would not discourage them from continuing to conduct Manual transactions on the Exchange because interacting with orders that are made available in open outcry on the Trading Floor promotes additional opportunities for quality executions. To the extent that this purpose is achieved, all of the Exchange’s market participants should benefit from the continued market liquidity. Enhanced market quality and increased transaction volume that results from the increase in order flow directed to the Exchange will benefit all market participants and improve competition on the Exchange. The Exchange also believes that increasing fees for Manual transactions by Market Makers relative to other market participants does not impose an undue burden on competition because, as noted above, Market Makers have access to other incentives in the Fee Schedule not available to other market participants.16 Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one of the 17 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange currently has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.17 Therefore, no exchange currently possesses significant pricing power in the execution of multiplylisted equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in October 2024, the Exchange had 6.26% market share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.18 The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment because it 15 See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 9, at 37499. 16 See note 13, supra. 17 See note 10, supra. 18 See note 11, supra. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:12 Dec 19, 2024 Jkt 265001 modifies the Exchange’s fees to be more closely aligned with fees charged by at least one other market with a Trading Floor for similar transactions.19 The Exchange also believes that the proposed change would continue to promote competition between the Exchange and other execution venues because continued Market Maker activity on the Trading Floor would encourage liquidity, thereby maintaining market quality on the Exchange and encouraging orders to be sent to the Exchange for execution. To the extent that this purpose is achieved, all the Exchange’s market participants should benefit from the improved market quality and increased opportunities for price improvement. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 20 of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 21 thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 22 of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: 19 See note 6, supra. U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). 20 15 PO 00000 Frm 00210 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 104281 Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include file number SR– NYSEAMER–2024–77 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to file number SR–NYSEAMER–2024–77. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR–NYSEAMER–2024–77 and should be submitted on or before January 10, 2025. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.23 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–30349 Filed 12–19–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 23 17 E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 20DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 104279-104281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-101920; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-77]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify 
the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule

December 16, 2024.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on December 11, 2024, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE American Options Fee 
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') regarding the charges applicable to Manual 
transactions by NYSE American Options Market Makers. The Exchange 
proposes to implement the fee change effective December 11, 2024.\4\ 
The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at 
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange previously filed to amend the Fee Schedule on 
November 29, 2024 (SR-NYSEAMER-2024-74), for December 2, 2024 
effectiveness, and withdrew such filing on December 11, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

[[Page 104280]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to modify Section I.A. of the Fee 
Schedule regarding the fee for Manual transactions by NYSE American 
Options Market Makers (``Market Makers''). Currently, Market Makers are 
charged $0.35 per contract for Manual transactions. The Exchange 
proposes to increase the fee for Market Makers' Manual transactions to 
$0.50 per contract.\5\ The proposed change is intended to more closely 
align the Exchange's fee for Manual transactions by Market Makers with 
fees charged by at least one other competing exchange.\6\ Although the 
proposed change would increase the fee for Manual transactions for 
Market Makers, the Exchange believes Market Makers will continue to 
quote actively to participate in transactions on the Trading Floor as 
they do today, thereby promoting trading opportunities and competition 
on the Trading Floor to the benefit of all market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.A. (Rates for Options 
transactions).
    \6\ See Nasdaq PHLX, Options 7 Pricing Schedule, Section 4 
(providing for $0.50 per contract fee for Market Maker manual 
transactions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly 
discriminatory. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is subject to 
significant competitive forces in the market for options securities 
transaction services that constrain its pricing determinations in that 
market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for 
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, 
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, 
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS 
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are currently 18 registered options exchanges competing for 
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding 
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\10\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity & ETF options 
order flow. More specifically, in October 2024, the Exchange had 6.26% 
market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options trades.\11\ In such a low-concentrated and highly competitive 
market, no single options exchange possesses significant pricing power 
in the execution of option order flow. Within this environment, market 
participants can freely and often do shift their order flow among the 
Exchange and competing venues in response to changes in their 
respective pricing schedules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety 
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, 
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
    \11\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options decreased slightly from 6.45% for the month of October 2023 
to 6.26% for the month of October 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed change is reasonable because, 
although it would increase the fee for Market Maker Manual 
transactions, it is designed to bring the Exchange's fee closer into 
alignment with a similar fee charged on at least one other competing 
exchange with a trading floor.\12\ In addition, although Market Makers 
would continue to be subject to a Manual transaction fee greater than 
those charged to other market participants, the proposed fee is 
reasonable, on balance, given various other incentives available only 
to Market Makers.\13\ The Exchange also believes the proposed change, 
although it would increase the fee applicable to Market Makers' Manual 
transactions, would not discourage Market Makers from conducting Manual 
transactions on the Exchange, thereby continuing to attract volume and 
liquidity to the Exchange generally and to the benefit all market 
participants (including those that do not participate in Manual 
transactions) through increased opportunities to trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See note 6, supra.
    \13\ See, e.g., Fee Schedule, Sections I.C. (NYSE American 
Options Market Maker Sliding Scale--Electronic) and I.D. (Prepayment 
Program).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable 
allocation of its fees and credits and is not unfairly discriminatory, 
as it applies equally to all similarly-situated market participants on 
an equal and non-discriminatory basis. The proposal is based on the 
type of business transacted on the Exchange, and Market Makers are not 
obligated to engage in Manual transactions. Market Makers benefit from 
having access to interact with orders that are made available in open 
outcry on the Trading Floor, and the Exchange believes that the 
proposed increased fee for Market Makers' Manual transactions is 
designed to balance the need to attract both Market Makers' and other 
market participants' orders to the Trading Floor. Although the proposed 
change would increase the fee for Market Makers' Manual transactions, 
the Exchange believes Market Makers would continue to quote actively so 
that they may participate in Manual transactions as they do today, 
thereby promoting competition and maintaining market quality for all 
market participants. The Exchange also believes that increasing fees 
for Manual transactions by Market Makers, but not for other market 
participants, represents an equitable, non-discriminatory allocation of 
fees on balance because Market Makers continue to be entitled to 
various incentives not available to other market participants.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does 
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed change would be consistent with charges for similar 
business on at least one other market. As a result, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in 
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among 
orders,

[[Page 104281]]

which promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all 
types of orders, large and small.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 9, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to 
continue to promote the use of the Exchange as a primary trading venue, 
and, specifically, to encourage competition on the Trading Floor. The 
proposed change is designed to balance the need to attract both Market 
Makers' and other market participants' orders to the Trading Floor. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed change to the fee applicable to 
Manual transactions by Market Makers would not discourage them from 
continuing to conduct Manual transactions on the Exchange because 
interacting with orders that are made available in open outcry on the 
Trading Floor promotes additional opportunities for quality executions. 
To the extent that this purpose is achieved, all of the Exchange's 
market participants should benefit from the continued market liquidity. 
Enhanced market quality and increased transaction volume that results 
from the increase in order flow directed to the Exchange will benefit 
all market participants and improve competition on the Exchange. The 
Exchange also believes that increasing fees for Manual transactions by 
Market Makers relative to other market participants does not impose an 
undue burden on competition because, as noted above, Market Makers have 
access to other incentives in the Fee Schedule not available to other 
market participants.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See note 13, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one 
of the 17 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a 
particular venue to be excessive. Based on publicly-available 
information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange 
currently has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of 
multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\17\ Therefore, no 
exchange currently possesses significant pricing power in the execution 
of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More 
specifically, in October 2024, the Exchange had 6.26% market share of 
executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See note 10, supra.
    \18\ See note 11, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this 
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees to be 
more closely aligned with fees charged by at least one other market 
with a Trading Floor for similar transactions.\19\ The Exchange also 
believes that the proposed change would continue to promote competition 
between the Exchange and other execution venues because continued 
Market Maker activity on the Trading Floor would encourage liquidity, 
thereby maintaining market quality on the Exchange and encouraging 
orders to be sent to the Exchange for execution. To the extent that 
this purpose is achieved, all the Exchange's market participants should 
benefit from the improved market quality and increased opportunities 
for price improvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See note 6, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \20\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \21\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \22\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-77 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-77. 
This file number should be included on the subject line if email is 
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website 
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the 
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do 
not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you 
should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication 
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. 
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-77 and 
should be submitted on or before January 10, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-30349 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.