Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Reinstatement Without Change: Reports of Evidence of Material Violations, 101673-101674 [2024-29477]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2024 / Notices
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, and in
particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act 94 and Rule 17Ad–22(e)(7) 95 and
(e)(16) thereunder.96
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act that the
proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2024–
005) be, and hereby is, approved.97
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.98
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–29474 Filed 12–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–101870; File No. SR–
CBOE–2024–047]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Designation
of a Longer Period for Commission
Action on a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Rules Regarding the Types
of Complex Orders Available for
Flexible Exchange Options (‘‘FLEX’’)
Trading at the Exchange
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
December 10, 2024.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
On October 11, 2024, Cboe Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
adopt rules to govern new types of
complex orders available for FLEX
trading. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on October 30, 2024.3
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
94 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7).
96 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(16).
97 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impacts on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
98 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101428
(October 24, 2024), 89 FR 86393.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
95 17
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
reasons for so finding, or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the notice for this
proposed rule change is December 14,
2024. The Commission is extending this
45-day time period.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,5 designates January
28, 2025, as the date by which the
Commission shall either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
CBOE–2024–047).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Dec 13, 2024
Jkt 265001
[FR Doc. 2024–29473 Filed 12–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Sunshine Act Meetings
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public
Law 94–409, that the Securities and
Exchange Commission will hold an
Open Meeting on Wednesday, December
18, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. (ET).
PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on
the Commission’s website at
www.sec.gov.
STATUS: This meeting will begin at 10:00
a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public
via webcast on the Commission’s
website at www.sec.gov.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. The Commission will consider
whether to approve the 2025 Final
Budget and Accounting Support Fee
for the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For further information, please contact
Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office
of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
TIME AND DATE:
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)
5 Id.
6 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
101673
Dated: December 11, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–29635 Filed 12–12–24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–514, OMB Control No.
3235–0572]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Reinstatement Without
Change: Reports of Evidence of
Material Violations
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit the existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for
reinstatement without change.
On February 6, 2003, the Commission
published final rules, effective August 5,
2003, entitled ‘‘Standards of
Professional Conduct for Attorneys
Appearing and Practicing Before the
Commission in the Representation of an
Issuer’’ (17 CFR 205.1–205.7). The
information collection embedded in the
rules is necessary to implement the
Standards of Professional Conduct for
Attorneys prescribed by the rule and
required by Section 307 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7245). The
rules impose an ‘‘up-the-ladder’’
reporting requirement when attorneys
appearing and practicing before the
Commission become aware of evidence
of a material violation by the issuer or
any officer, director, employee, or agent
of the issuer. An issuer may choose to
establish a qualified legal compliance
committee (‘‘QLCC’’) as an alternative
procedure for reporting evidence of a
material violation. In the rare cases in
which a majority of a QLCC has
concluded that an issuer did not act
appropriately, the information may be
communicated to the Commission. The
collection of information is, therefore,
an important component of the
Commission’s program to discourage
violations of the federal securities laws
and promote ethical behavior of
attorneys appearing and practicing
before the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
101674
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
This information collection
requirement was previously approved
by OMB, but the approval expired on
November 30, 2021. Accordingly, the
Commission will request a
reinstatement without change of OMB’s
approval.
The respondents to this collection of
information are attorneys who appear
and practice before the Commission
and, in certain cases, the issuer, and/or
officers, directors and committees of the
issuer. We believe that, in providing
quality representation to issuers,
attorneys report evidence of violations
to others within the issuer, including
the Chief Legal Officer, the Chief
Executive Officer, and, where necessary,
the directors. In addition, officers and
directors investigate evidence of
violations and report within the issuer
the results of the investigation and the
remedial steps they have taken or
sanctions they have imposed. Except as
discussed below, we therefore believe
that the reporting requirements imposed
by the rule are ‘‘usual and customary’’
activities that do not add to the burden
that would be imposed by the collection
of information.
Certain aspects of the collection of
information, however, may impose a
burden. For an issuer to establish a
QLCC, the QLCC must adopt written
procedures for the confidential receipt,
retention, and consideration of any
report of evidence of a material
violation. We estimate for purposes of
the PRA that there are approximately
11,484 issuers that are subject to the
rules.1 Of these, we estimate that
approximately 346, which is
approximately 3 percent, have
established or will establish a QLCC.2
Establishing the written procedures
required by the rule should not impose
a significant burden. We assume that an
issuer would incur a greater burden in
the year that it first establishes the
procedures than in subsequent years, in
which the burden would be incurred in
updating, reviewing, or modifying the
procedures. For purposes of the PRA,
we assume that an issuer would spend
6 hours every three-year period on the
procedures. This would result in an
average burden of 2 hours per year.
Thus, we estimate for purposes of the
PRA that the total annual burden
1 This figure is based on the estimated 8,230
operating companies that filed annual reports on
Form 10–K, Form 20–F, or Form 40–F during the
2023 calendar year, and the estimated 3,254
investment companies that filed periodic reports on
Form N–CEN during that same period.
2 This estimate is based on issuer-filings made
with the Commission between January 1, 2021, and
September 30, 2024, that include a reference to the
issuer’s QLCC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Dec 13, 2024
Jkt 265001
imposed by the collection of
information would be 692 hours.
Assuming half of the burden hours will
be incurred by outside counsel at a rate
of $700 per hour, the resulting cost
would be $242,200.
The estimate of average burden hours
is made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not
derived from a comprehensive or even
a representative survey or study. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Written comments are requested on:
(a) whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information has
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission’s estimate of the burden[s]
of the collection of information; (c) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing by February 14, 2025.
Please direct your written comments
to: Austin Gerig, Director/Chief Data
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Tanya Ruttenberg, 100
F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or
send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@
sec.gov.
Dated: December 10, 2024.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–29477 Filed 12–13–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–101866; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
American Options Fee Schedule
Concerning the Options Regulatory
Fee (ORF)
December 10, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
notice is hereby given that, on
November 25, 2024, NYSE American
LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE American Options Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) regarding the Options
Regulatory Fee (‘‘ORF’’). The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule to (1) temporarily waive
the ORF for the period December 1,
2024 through December 31, 2024 (the
‘‘Waiver Period’’), and (2) delete
outdated language relating to a prior
ORF waiver and superseded ORF rate.
Background
As a general matter, the Exchange
may only use regulatory funds such as
the ORF ‘‘to fund the legal, regulatory,
and surveillance operations’’ of the
Exchange.4 More specifically, the ORF
4 The Exchange considers surveillance operations
part of regulatory operations. The limitation on the
use of regulatory funds also provides that they shall
not be distributed. See Thirteenth Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement of NYSE American
LLC, Article IV, Section 4.05 and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 87993 (January 16, 2020),
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 101673-101674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29477]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270-514, OMB Control No. 3235-0572]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Reinstatement Without
Change: Reports of Evidence of Material Violations
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit the
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for reinstatement without change.
On February 6, 2003, the Commission published final rules,
effective August 5, 2003, entitled ``Standards of Professional Conduct
for Attorneys Appearing and Practicing Before the Commission in the
Representation of an Issuer'' (17 CFR 205.1-205.7). The information
collection embedded in the rules is necessary to implement the
Standards of Professional Conduct for Attorneys prescribed by the rule
and required by Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15
U.S.C. 7245). The rules impose an ``up-the-ladder'' reporting
requirement when attorneys appearing and practicing before the
Commission become aware of evidence of a material violation by the
issuer or any officer, director, employee, or agent of the issuer. An
issuer may choose to establish a qualified legal compliance committee
(``QLCC'') as an alternative procedure for reporting evidence of a
material violation. In the rare cases in which a majority of a QLCC has
concluded that an issuer did not act appropriately, the information may
be communicated to the Commission. The collection of information is,
therefore, an important component of the Commission's program to
discourage violations of the federal securities laws and promote
ethical behavior of attorneys appearing and practicing before the
Commission.
[[Page 101674]]
This information collection requirement was previously approved by
OMB, but the approval expired on November 30, 2021. Accordingly, the
Commission will request a reinstatement without change of OMB's
approval.
The respondents to this collection of information are attorneys who
appear and practice before the Commission and, in certain cases, the
issuer, and/or officers, directors and committees of the issuer. We
believe that, in providing quality representation to issuers, attorneys
report evidence of violations to others within the issuer, including
the Chief Legal Officer, the Chief Executive Officer, and, where
necessary, the directors. In addition, officers and directors
investigate evidence of violations and report within the issuer the
results of the investigation and the remedial steps they have taken or
sanctions they have imposed. Except as discussed below, we therefore
believe that the reporting requirements imposed by the rule are ``usual
and customary'' activities that do not add to the burden that would be
imposed by the collection of information.
Certain aspects of the collection of information, however, may
impose a burden. For an issuer to establish a QLCC, the QLCC must adopt
written procedures for the confidential receipt, retention, and
consideration of any report of evidence of a material violation. We
estimate for purposes of the PRA that there are approximately 11,484
issuers that are subject to the rules.\1\ Of these, we estimate that
approximately 346, which is approximately 3 percent, have established
or will establish a QLCC.\2\ Establishing the written procedures
required by the rule should not impose a significant burden. We assume
that an issuer would incur a greater burden in the year that it first
establishes the procedures than in subsequent years, in which the
burden would be incurred in updating, reviewing, or modifying the
procedures. For purposes of the PRA, we assume that an issuer would
spend 6 hours every three-year period on the procedures. This would
result in an average burden of 2 hours per year. Thus, we estimate for
purposes of the PRA that the total annual burden imposed by the
collection of information would be 692 hours. Assuming half of the
burden hours will be incurred by outside counsel at a rate of $700 per
hour, the resulting cost would be $242,200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This figure is based on the estimated 8,230 operating
companies that filed annual reports on Form 10-K, Form 20-F, or Form
40-F during the 2023 calendar year, and the estimated 3,254
investment companies that filed periodic reports on Form N-CEN
during that same period.
\2\ This estimate is based on issuer-filings made with the
Commission between January 1, 2021, and September 30, 2024, that
include a reference to the issuer's QLCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Written comments are requested on: (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden[s]
of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing by February 14, 2025.
Please direct your written comments to: Austin Gerig, Director/
Chief Data Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Tanya
Ruttenberg, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email to:
[email protected].
Dated: December 10, 2024.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-29477 Filed 12-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P