Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination; and Notice of Amended Antidumping Duty Order, 99226-99227 [2024-28946]

Download as PDF 99226 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–093] Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination; and Notice of Amended Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 25, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) third remand redetermination pertaining to the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of refillable stainless steel kegs (kegs) from the People’s Republic of China (China) covering the period of investigation (POI) January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT’s final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce’s final determination in that investigation, and that Commerce is amending the final determination and the resulting antidumping duty (AD) order with respect to the dumping margin for certain respondents eligible for a separate rate, i.e., Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Master), Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Jingye), and Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Ulix). The merchandise exported by these three exporters is included in the amended AD order. DATES: Applicable December 5, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Background On October 24, 2019, Commerce published its Final Determination in the LTFV investigation of kegs from China.1 1 See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 84 FR 57010 (October 24, 2019) (Final Determination). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Dec 09, 2024 Jkt 265001 On December 16, 2019, Commerce subsequently published the AD order on kegs from China.2 New American Keg, d/b/a American Keg Company appealed Commerce’s Final Determination. On March 23, 2021, the CIT remanded the Final Determination to Commerce, ordering Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) its selection of the Malaysian surrogate labor data over the Brazilian surrogate labor data to value factors of production (FOPs) for labor; and (2) whether Guangzhou Ulix is eligible for a separate rate.3 In the First Redetermination, Commerce determined that ‘‘Malaysian data does not constitute the best available information for valuing Ningbo Master’s labor FOPs because it is linked to forced labor.’’ 4 Commerce further determined that ‘‘based on the information on the record, {it}selected the Mexican labor {surrogate value (SV)} from {Conference Board’s International Labor Comparisons (ILC)} as the best information available to value Ningbo Master’s labor FOPs’’ and ‘‘inflated the Mexican labor SV from ILC to the {POI using Brazilian inflator} and recalculated Ningbo Master’s margin.’’ 5 In the First Redetermination, Commerce also examined certain evidence requested by the CIT and determined that Guangzhou Ulix remained eligible for a separate rate.6 On September 13, 2022, the CIT remanded the First Redetermination and ordered Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) the use of the Mexican surrogate labor data inflated with Brazilian consumer price index (CPI) when the Brazilian surrogate labor data are available on the record; and (2) the evidence in the administrative record that supports granting Guangzhou Ulix a separate rate.7 In the Second Redetermination, after filing the First Redetermination and requesting a voluntary remand, Commerce acknowledge that it was improper to inflate the Mexican labor wage rate from the ILC using Brazilian CPI.8 2 See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the Federal Republic of Germany and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 68405 (December 16, 2019) (Order). 3 See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 21–30 (CIT March 23, 2021). 4 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 21–30 (CIT March 23, 2021), dated July 7, 2021 (First Redetermination). 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 22–106 (CIT September 13, 2022). 8 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, New American Keg v. United PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notwithstanding, Commerce continued to determine that the Mexican labor wage data are superior to the Brazilian labor wage data and, in order to achieve an accurate calculation, Commerce reopened the record and placed on the record data from the International Labour Organization (ILO).9 Consequently, in the Second Redetermination, Commerce used the Mexican wage rate from the ILO data for 2018 (contemporaneous with the POI) and recalculated Ningbo Master’s margin accordingly.10 In the Second Redetermination, Commerce also determined that Guangzhou Ulix has met its burden for a separate rate status.11 On January 31, 2024, the CIT remanded the Second Redetermination, holding that Commerce abused its discretion in reopening the record to use Mexican ILO wage data, because Commerce made no showing that the Brazilian wage information on the record was inaccurate or otherwise unsuitable for the calculation of Ningbo Master’s margin.12 In its third final remand redetermination, Commerce used the Brazilian labor SV from 2016, inflated to the POI, and recalculated Ningbo Master’s margin.13 On November 25, 2024, the CIT sustained Commerce’s third final remand redetermination.14 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken,15 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,16 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s November 25, 2024, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 22–106 (CIT September 13, 2022), dated November 10, 2022 (Second Redetermination). 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 24–11 (CIT January 31, 2024). 13 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 24–11 (CIT January 31, 2024), dated March 25, 2024. 14 See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20–00008, Slip Op. 24–129 (CIT November 25, 2024). 15 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 16 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1 99227 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Notices that is not in harmony with Commerce’s Final Determination. Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its Final Determination with respect to the following exporter-producer combinations: Weighted average dumping margin (percent ad valorem) Exporter Producer Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd ................. Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd ........................ Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd ............. Ningbo Major Draft Beer Equipment Co., Ltd .............. Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd ........................ Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd ........................ Amended Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to section 735(a)(4) of the Act, Commerce ‘‘shall disregard any weighted average dumping margin that is de minimis as defined in section 733(b)(3) of the Act’’ 18 and pursuant to section 735(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce shall ‘‘issue an antidumping duty order under section 736’’ of the Act when the final determination is affirmative. In the Final Determination, the exporterproducer combination identified above for respondent Ningbo Master received a zero percent margin. As a result of this amended final determination, in which Commerce calculated an estimated weighted-average dumping margin above de minimis for the exporterproducer combination identified above for Ningbo Master, Commerce is hereby including entries of subject merchandise that were produced by Ningbo Major Draft Beer Equipment Co., Ltd., and exported by Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd., within the Order. However, Commerce recently revoked the Order effective December 16, 2024.19 Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for Ningbo Master. Because Guangzhou Jingye and Guangzhou Ulix have a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a subsequent 17 See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 84 FR 57005 (October 24, 2019), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5 for the export subsidy rate. 18 Section 733(b)(3) of the Act defines a de minimis dumping margin as ‘‘less than 2 percent ad valorem or the equivalent specific rate for the subject merchandise.’’ 19 See Refillable Stainless-Steel Kegs from Mexico and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Reviews and Revocation of Orders, 89 FR 92095, 92096 (November 21, 2024) (Order Revocation). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Dec 09, 2024 administrative review,20 Commerce will not issue revised cash deposit instructions for those companies. This notice will not affect the current cash deposit rate for these companies. However, as stated in the Order Revocation, in accordance with section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), Commerce intends to instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the merchandise subject to the Order entered, or withdrawn from the warehouse, on or after December 16, 2024.21 Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 4, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2024–28946 Filed 12–9–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Cash Deposit Requirements khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES Amended Final Determination Jkt 265001 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XE475] Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Marine Site Characterization Surveys Off Rhode Island and Massachusetts National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. AGENCY: 20 See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021– 2022, 89 FR 25564 (April 11, 2024) (Commerce denied separate rate eligibility for Guangzhou Jingye and Guangzhou Ulix and treated them as part of the China-wide entity.). 21 See Order Revocation, 89 FR 92095–96. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4.23 4.23 4.23 Cash deposit rate (adjusted for subsidy offsets) (percent ad valorem) 17 3.96 3.96 3.96 Notice; proposed modification of an incidental harassment authorization; request for comments. ACTION: NMFS is proposing to modify an existing incidental harassment authorization (IHA) issued to Bay State Wind, LLC (Bay State Wind) on October 3, 2024, authorizing take of marine mammals incidental to marine site characterization surveys conducted off the coasts of Rhode Island and Massachusetts in the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Commercial Lease of Submerged Lands for Renewable Energy Development on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lease Area OCS–A 0500 and the associated export cable route (ECR) area. While conducting said marine site characterization surveys, Bay State Wind has encountered common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) at a rate greater than anticipated under the analysis for that IHA and, therefore, requests that NMFS modify the IHA to increase the number of authorized take by Level B harassment for that species only. No other changes to the IHA were requested or are proposed herein, and the expiration date remains unchanged. NMFS will consider public comments on the requested modification prior to making any final decision and agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our decision. DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than December 26, 2024. ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. Written comments should be submitted via email to ITP.hilt@noaa.gov. Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period. Comments, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25megabyte file size. All comments SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 99226-99227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28946]



[[Page 99226]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-093]


Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs From the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final 
Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final 
Determination; and Notice of Amended Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On November 25, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade 
(CIT) issued its final judgment in New American Keg v. United States, 
Court No. 20-00008, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's 
(Commerce) third remand redetermination pertaining to the less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation of refillable stainless steel kegs 
(kegs) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period 
of investigation (POI) January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018. Commerce 
is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony 
with Commerce's final determination in that investigation, and that 
Commerce is amending the final determination and the resulting 
antidumping duty (AD) order with respect to the dumping margin for 
certain respondents eligible for a separate rate, i.e., Ningbo Master 
International Trade Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Master), Guangzhou Jingye 
Machinery Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Jingye), and Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & 
Trading Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Ulix). The merchandise exported by these 
three exporters is included in the amended AD order.

DATES: Applicable December 5, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 24, 2019, Commerce published its Final Determination in 
the LTFV investigation of kegs from China.\1\ On December 16, 2019, 
Commerce subsequently published the AD order on kegs from China.\2\ New 
American Keg, d/b/a American Keg Company appealed Commerce's Final 
Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical 
Circumstances, in Part, 84 FR 57010 (October 24, 2019) (Final 
Determination).
    \2\ See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the Federal 
Republic of Germany and the People's Republic of China: Antidumping 
Duty Orders, 84 FR 68405 (December 16, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 23, 2021, the CIT remanded the Final Determination to 
Commerce, ordering Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) its 
selection of the Malaysian surrogate labor data over the Brazilian 
surrogate labor data to value factors of production (FOPs) for labor; 
and (2) whether Guangzhou Ulix is eligible for a separate rate.\3\ In 
the First Redetermination, Commerce determined that ``Malaysian data 
does not constitute the best available information for valuing Ningbo 
Master's labor FOPs because it is linked to forced labor.'' \4\ 
Commerce further determined that ``based on the information on the 
record, {it{time} selected the Mexican labor {surrogate value 
(SV){time}  from {Conference Board's International Labor Comparisons 
(ILC){time}  as the best information available to value Ningbo Master's 
labor FOPs'' and ``inflated the Mexican labor SV from ILC to the {POI 
using Brazilian inflator{time}  and recalculated Ningbo Master's 
margin.'' \5\ In the First Redetermination, Commerce also examined 
certain evidence requested by the CIT and determined that Guangzhou 
Ulix remained eligible for a separate rate.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, 
Slip Op. 21-30 (CIT March 23, 2021).
    \4\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, Slip 
Op. 21-30 (CIT March 23, 2021), dated July 7, 2021 (First 
Redetermination).
    \5\ Id.
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 13, 2022, the CIT remanded the First Redetermination 
and ordered Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) the use of 
the Mexican surrogate labor data inflated with Brazilian consumer price 
index (CPI) when the Brazilian surrogate labor data are available on 
the record; and (2) the evidence in the administrative record that 
supports granting Guangzhou Ulix a separate rate.\7\ In the Second 
Redetermination, after filing the First Redetermination and requesting 
a voluntary remand, Commerce acknowledge that it was improper to 
inflate the Mexican labor wage rate from the ILC using Brazilian 
CPI.\8\ Notwithstanding, Commerce continued to determine that the 
Mexican labor wage data are superior to the Brazilian labor wage data 
and, in order to achieve an accurate calculation, Commerce re-opened 
the record and placed on the record data from the International Labour 
Organization (ILO).\9\ Consequently, in the Second Redetermination, 
Commerce used the Mexican wage rate from the ILO data for 2018 
(contemporaneous with the POI) and recalculated Ningbo Master's margin 
accordingly.\10\ In the Second Redetermination, Commerce also 
determined that Guangzhou Ulix has met its burden for a separate rate 
status.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, 
Slip Op. 22-106 (CIT September 13, 2022).
    \8\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, Slip 
Op. 22-106 (CIT September 13, 2022), dated November 10, 2022 (Second 
Redetermination).
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 31, 2024, the CIT remanded the Second Redetermination, 
holding that Commerce abused its discretion in reopening the record to 
use Mexican ILO wage data, because Commerce made no showing that the 
Brazilian wage information on the record was inaccurate or otherwise 
unsuitable for the calculation of Ningbo Master's margin.\12\ In its 
third final remand redetermination, Commerce used the Brazilian labor 
SV from 2016, inflated to the POI, and recalculated Ningbo Master's 
margin.\13\ On November 25, 2024, the CIT sustained Commerce's third 
final remand redetermination.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, 
Slip Op. 24-11 (CIT January 31, 2024).
    \13\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, Slip 
Op. 24-11 (CIT January 31, 2024), dated March 25, 2024.
    \14\ See New American Keg v. United States, Court No. 20-00008, 
Slip Op. 24-129 (CIT November 25, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\15\ as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades,\16\ the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 
that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision 
that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must 
suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. 
The CIT's November 25, 2024, judgment constitutes a final decision of 
the CIT

[[Page 99227]]

that is not in harmony with Commerce's Final Determination. Thus, this 
notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \16\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Determination

    Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending 
its Final Determination with respect to the following exporter-producer 
combinations:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                   Cash deposit
                                                                                     Weighted     rate (adjusted
                                                                                      average       for subsidy
                   Exporter                                 Producer              dumping margin     offsets)
                                                                                    (percent ad     (percent ad
                                                                                     valorem)        valorem)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd....  Ningbo Major Draft Beer                     4.23       \17\ 3.96
                                                 Equipment Co., Ltd.
Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd...........  Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co.,             4.23            3.96
                                                 Ltd.
Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd..  Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co.,             4.23            3.96
                                                 Ltd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Antidumping Duty Order
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 
Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical 
Circumstances, in Part, 84 FR 57005 (October 24, 2019), and 
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5 for the export 
subsidy rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 735(a)(4) of the Act, Commerce ``shall 
disregard any weighted average dumping margin that is de minimis as 
defined in section 733(b)(3) of the Act'' \18\ and pursuant to section 
735(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce shall ``issue an antidumping duty order 
under section 736'' of the Act when the final determination is 
affirmative. In the Final Determination, the exporter-producer 
combination identified above for respondent Ningbo Master received a 
zero percent margin. As a result of this amended final determination, 
in which Commerce calculated an estimated weighted-average dumping 
margin above de minimis for the exporter-producer combination 
identified above for Ningbo Master, Commerce is hereby including 
entries of subject merchandise that were produced by Ningbo Major Draft 
Beer Equipment Co., Ltd., and exported by Ningbo Master International 
Trade Co., Ltd., within the Order. However, Commerce recently revoked 
the Order effective December 16, 2024.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Section 733(b)(3) of the Act defines a de minimis dumping 
margin as ``less than 2 percent ad valorem or the equivalent 
specific rate for the subject merchandise.''
    \19\ See Refillable Stainless-Steel Kegs from Mexico and the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Reviews and 
Revocation of Orders, 89 FR 92095, 92096 (November 21, 2024) (Order 
Revocation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for Ningbo Master.
    Because Guangzhou Jingye and Guangzhou Ulix have a superseding cash 
deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a 
subsequent administrative review,\20\ Commerce will not issue revised 
cash deposit instructions for those companies. This notice will not 
affect the current cash deposit rate for these companies. However, as 
stated in the Order Revocation, in accordance with section 751(c)(3)(A) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), Commerce intends to instruct 
CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the merchandise 
subject to the Order entered, or withdrawn from the warehouse, on or 
after December 16, 2024.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 89 FR 25564 (April 11, 2024) 
(Commerce denied separate rate eligibility for Guangzhou Jingye and 
Guangzhou Ulix and treated them as part of the China-wide entity.).
    \21\ See Order Revocation, 89 FR 92095-96.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: December 4, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-28946 Filed 12-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.