Glycine From India: Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022, 95180-95181 [2024-28150]
Download as PDF
95180
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices
likely to prevail would be margins up to
44.35 percent.9
DATES:
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice serves as the only
reminder to interested parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility
concerning the return/destruction or
conversion to judicial protective order
of proprietary information disclosed
under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials
or conversion to judicial protective
order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject
to sanction.
Scarlet Jaldin or Amber Hodak AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4275 or (202) 482–8034,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: November 25, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
Applicable December 2, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On July 5, 2024, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results of this
administrative review.1 On July 22,
2024, Commerce tolled certain
deadlines in this administrative
proceeding by seven days.2 On
November 12, 2024, Commerce
extended the deadline for these final
results to November 19, 2024.3 On
November 18, 2024, Commerce further
extended the deadline for these final
results by an additional three days, to
November 22, 2024.4 We received
timely filed case and rebuttal briefs from
Deer Park Glycine, LLC (the petitioner)
and Kumar.5 For a complete description
of the events that occurred since the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.6
Scope of the Order 7
The merchandise covered by the
Order is glycine from India. For a
complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.8
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties’ briefs
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues
[FR Doc. 2024–28174 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–884]
Glycine From India: Final Results of
the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies were provided
to Kumar Industries, India (Kumar), a
producer and exporter of glycine from
India during the period of review (POR)
January 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
9 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Nov 29, 2024
Jkt 265001
1 See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 55550 (July 5,
2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated November 12, 2024.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated November 18, 2024.
5 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Deer Park
Glycine, LLC,’’ dated August 5, 2024; see also
Kumar’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated August 12,
2024.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Glycine from India; 2022,’’ dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
7 See Glycine from India and the People’s
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Orders, 84
FR 29173 (June 21, 2019) (Order).
8 Id. at 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addressed is attached as an appendix to
this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access/trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the arguments raised and a
review of the record and all supporting
documentation, we made certain
changes to the Preliminary Results. For
a full description of these revisions, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
each of the subsidy programs found to
be countervailable, Commerce finds that
there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.9 For a
full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, including
any determination that relied upon the
use of adverse facts available pursuant
to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see
the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the
following countervailable subsidy rate
exists for the period January 1, 2022,
through December 31, 2022:10
Company
Kumar Industries, India; Advance Chemical Corporation;
Rexisize Rasayan Industries;
Reliance Corporation ..............
Subsidy
rate
(percent
ad valorem)
6.03
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its
calculations and analysis performed to
9 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; see also section
771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section
771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
10 As discussed in the Preliminary Results and
Issues and Decision Memorandum, Commerce has
found the following companies to be cross-owned
with Kumar Industries, India: Advance Chemical
Corporation, Rexisize Rasayan Industries, and
Reliance Corporation.
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices
interested parties for these final results
within five days of any public
announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the
date of publication of the notice of final
results in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and
(a)(2)(C) of the act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has
determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries for the above-listed companies at
the applicable ad valorem assessment
rates. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the publication
of the final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties for each
of the companies listed above on
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
all-others rate or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash
deposit instructions, effective upon
publication of these final results, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing the final results
and publishing this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 22, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should
Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to
Kumar
Comment 2: Whether Kumar Violated 18
U.S.C. 1001
VIII. Recommendation
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Review
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset)
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Country
A–570–097 ............
A–533–885 ............
C–570–098 ............
731–TA–1429 ........
731–TA–1430 ........
701–TA–612 ..........
China .....................
India .......................
China .....................
C–533–886 ............
701–TA–613 ..........
India .......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Nov 29, 2024
Jkt 265001
Background
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[FR Doc. 2024–28150 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am]
ITC case No.
As a courtesy, we are making
information related to sunset
proceedings, including copies of the
In accordance with the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the
U.S. Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is automatically initiating
the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews)
of the antidumping and countervailing
duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended
investigation(s) listed below. The U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC) is
publishing concurrently with this notice
its notice of Institution of Five-Year
Reviews which covers the same order(s)
and suspended investigation(s).
DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commerce official identified in the
Initiation of Review section below at
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230. For
information from the ITC, contact Mary
Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission at (202)
205–3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Commerce’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR
13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR
62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to Commerce’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping
Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012).
DOC case No.
Filing Information
95181
Product
Polyester Textured Yarn
Polyester Textured Yarn
Polyester Textured Yarn
Kolberg (1st Review).
Polyester Textured Yarn
pertinent statute and Commerce’s
regulations, Commerce’s schedule for
Sunset Reviews, a listing of past
revocations and continuations, and
current service lists, available to the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
In accordance with section 751(c) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are
initiating the Sunset Reviews of the
following antidumping and
countervailing duty order(s) and
suspended investigation(s):
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commerce contact
(1st Review)
(1st Review)
Mary
Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785.
Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785.
Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785.
(1st Review)
Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785.
public on Commerce’s website at the
following address: https://enforcement.
trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in
these Sunset Reviews must be filed in
accordance with Commerce’s
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95180-95181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28150]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-884]
Glycine From India: Final Results of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies were provided to Kumar Industries, India
(Kumar), a producer and exporter of glycine from India during the
period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scarlet Jaldin or Amber Hodak AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4275 or (202) 482-8034,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 5, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this
administrative review.\1\ On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain
deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.\2\ On
November 12, 2024, Commerce extended the deadline for these final
results to November 19, 2024.\3\ On November 18, 2024, Commerce further
extended the deadline for these final results by an additional three
days, to November 22, 2024.\4\ We received timely filed case and
rebuttal briefs from Deer Park Glycine, LLC (the petitioner) and
Kumar.\5\ For a complete description of the events that occurred since
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022,
89 FR 55550 (July 5, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated November 12,
2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated November 18,
2024.
\5\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Case Brief of Deer Park Glycine,
LLC,'' dated August 5, 2024; see also Kumar's Letter, ``Rebuttal
Brief,'' dated August 12, 2024.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Glycine from India; 2022,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Glycine from India and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 29173 (June 21, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is glycine from India. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed is
attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access/trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the arguments raised and a review of the record and all
supporting documentation, we made certain changes to the Preliminary
Results. For a full description of these revisions, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, Commerce
finds that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an
``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that
the subsidy is specific.\9\ For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, including any determination that relied
upon the use of adverse facts available pursuant to section 776(a) and
(b) of the Act, see the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; see also section 771(5)(E) of the Act
regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding
specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the following countervailable subsidy rate
exists for the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022:\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ As discussed in the Preliminary Results and Issues and
Decision Memorandum, Commerce has found the following companies to
be cross-owned with Kumar Industries, India: Advance Chemical
Corporation, Rexisize Rasayan Industries, and Reliance Corporation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy
rate
Company (percent
ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kumar Industries, India; Advance Chemical Corporation; 6.03
Rexisize Rasayan Industries; Reliance Corporation..........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to
[[Page 95181]]
interested parties for these final results within five days of any
public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five
days of the date of publication of the notice of final results in the
Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C) of the act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries for the above-listed companies at the applicable ad valorem
assessment rates. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90
days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends
to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties for each of the companies listed above on shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP
to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties
at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate
applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit
instructions, effective upon publication of these final results, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing the final results and publishing this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 22, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available
(AFA) to Kumar
Comment 2: Whether Kumar Violated 18 U.S.C. 1001
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-28150 Filed 11-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P