Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, Strengthening Community Colleges Training Grant Program Round 4 (SCC4) Evaluation, New Collection, 91802-91804 [2024-27044]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
91802
[FR Doc. 2024–27098 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–C
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request,
Strengthening Community Colleges
Training Grant Program Round 4
(SCC4) Evaluation, New Collection
Office of Employment and
Training Administration, Chief
Evaluation Office, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the
general public and federal agencies with
an opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95). This program helps to ensure
that requested data can be provided in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is
minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents
is properly assessed. Currently, the
Department of Labor is soliciting
comments concerning the collection of
data for an evaluation of the fourth
round of the Strengthening Community
Colleges Training Grants Program. A
copy of the proposed Information
Collection Request (ICR) can be
obtained by contacting the office listed
below in the addressee section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
January 21, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either one of the following methods:
Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@
dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Suchitra
Akmanchi, Chief Evaluation Office,
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
OASP, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
S–2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210. Instructions:
Please submit one copy of your
comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the
agency name and OMB Control Number
identified above for this information
collection. Comments, including any
personal information provided, become
a matter of public record. They will also
be summarized and/or included in the
request for OMB approval of the
information collection request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suchitra Akmanchi by email at
ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov or by
phone at (202) 693 8935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The Chief Evaluation
Office (CEO) and the Employment and
Training Administration (ETA) in the
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) are
partnering to commission an evaluation
of the fourth round of the Strengthening
Community Colleges Training Grants
Program (SCC4). The program, which
awarded grants to sixteen community
college grantees, aims to enable
community colleges to adopt and
enhance evidence-based career
pathways programs that lead to
equitable access to employment
opportunities in good jobs aligned with
locally in-demand industries. The SCC4
evaluation will shed light on which
programs are effective for which types
of students, why they are effective, and
the core components that support
success. In addition, SCC4 will build on
existing evidence regarding successful
programs in community college settings
and advance the understanding of how
career pathways programs promote
equitable outcomes. The SCC4
Evaluation includes two components:
(1) an impact study to measure the
effects of SCC4 grant program strategies
on participant outcomes and (2) an
implementation study to understand
program implementation. The impact
study will include both a quasiexperimental design (QED) and a
randomized controlled trial (RCT) each
with a subset of grantees. Impact study
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
grantees were identified during an
evaluability assessment in summer
2024, during which they were assessed
on a series of criteria including the
potential number of enrolled students,
interest in and feasibility of random
assignment of students to treatment and
control service groups, and a notable
difference in the services available to
treatment and control group students.
Five community college sites from four
grantees will be included in the RCT
portion of the study. Twelve grantees
will be included in the QED study. The
implementation study will include all
sixteen grantees and examine the
context of SCC4 programs, including
how grantees integrate employer
perspectives and student voice to shape
programming. The evaluation will occur
over four years (2024 to 2028). The
evaluation will rely on rigorous study
procedures and high-quality data. To
facilitate these studies, the evaluation
will use several instruments, which will
be used during site visits, phone calls,
and surveys with SCC4-involved staff
and participating students.
This Federal Register Notice provides
the opportunity to comment on the
following proposed data collection
instruments that the evaluation will use:
Impact Study:
1. Participant baseline survey and
consent form. Survey of 6,000 impact
study participants to collect basic
demographic information, interest in
receiving support services, and current
employment and earnings information.
2. Participant follow-up survey.
Follow-up survey of 1,800 impact study
participants focused on job quality, job
characteristics, and overall well-being.
3. Service receipt logs. As part of the
impact study data, grantee staff will
track information frequency and type of
the services they provide to
participants. Fifteen grantee staff across
the five participating impact study sites,
will be responsible for inputting
information into these logs.
Implementation Study:
The implementation study will use
the following data collections to
understand the education and economic
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
EN20NO24.091</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Notices
91803
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Notices
context surrounding the program, the
organization and administrative
structure, recruitment and enrollment,
partnerships, employer engagement and
work-based learning, integrated
academic and career learning, academic
and career counseling, wrap-around
services, and program sustainability.
4. Grantee survey. Survey of a lead
contact each of the 16 grantees to collect
program information on service delivery
models, staffing, partnerships, and the
implementation of the main program
elements.
5. Semi-structured interview guide for
college administrators and program
directors. During the two rounds of site
visits to impact study sites and phone
calls with non-impact study sites calls,
we will conduct one-on-one or small
group, semi-structured interviews with
up to 80 college administrators and
program directors.
6. Semi-structured interview guide for
instructors and faculty. During the two
rounds of site visits with impact study
sites and phone calls with non-impact
study sites, we will conduct one-on-one
or small group, semi-structured
interviews with up to 64 instructors and
faculty for SCC4 programs.
7. Semi-structured interview guide for
SCC4 participants. During the two
rounds of site visits with impact study
sites and phone calls with non-impact
study sites, we will conduct one-on-one
or small group, semi-structured
interviews with up to 64 SCC4
participants.
8. Semi-structured interview guide for
college staff. During the two rounds of
site visits with impact study sites and
phone calls with non-impact study sites,
we will conduct one-on-one or small
group, semi-structured interviews with
up to 80 college staff providing services
to SCC4 students, such as staff in
student support services or the
admissions office.
9. Semi-structured interview guide for
external constituents. During the two
rounds of site visits with impact study
sites and phone calls with non-impact
study sites, we will conduct one-on-one
or small group, semi-structured
interviews with up to 80 external
constituents who may interact with
SCC4 students, or support
implementation of SCC4 programs, such
as employer partners.
II. Desired Focus of Comments:
Currently, the Department of Labor is
soliciting comments concerning the
above data collection for the Sectoral
Strategies and Employer Engagement
Portfolio Program Evaluation. DOL is
particularly interested in comments that
do the following:
Æ evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
Æ evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s burden estimate of the
proposed information collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions;
Æ enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
Æ minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology—
for example, permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions: At this time, DOL
is requesting clearance for the
participant baseline survey and consent
form, the participant follow-up survey,
service receipt logs, the grantee survey,
and semi-structured interview guides.
Type of review: New information
collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1290–0NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Comments submitted in response to
this request will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Participant baseline survey ..................................................
Participant follow-up survey .................................................
Service receipt logs .............................................................
Grantee survey ....................................................................
College administrator and program director interviews .......
Instructors and faculty interviews ........................................
Participant interviews ...........................................................
College staff interviews ........................................................
External constituent interviews ............................................
1 6,000
Total ..............................................................................
1 Assumes
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
2 Assumes
riod.
3 Assumes
4 Assumes
5 Assumes
6 Assumes
7 Assumes
8 Assumes
9 Assumes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(hour)
Total number
responses
Estimated total
annual burden
(hours)
9 80
1
1
2,600
1
2
2
2
2
2
6,000
1,800
39,000
16
160
128
128
160
160
.16
.33
.05
.5
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
320
198
650
3
40
32
32
32
40
8,199
........................
47,552
........................
1,347
2 1,800
315
4 16
5 80
6 64
7 64
8 80
a total of 6,000 impact study participants over the three-year clearance period.
a sample of 6,000 with a 30 percent response rate for a total of 1,800 impact study participants over the three-year clearance pe3
1
5
4
4
5
5
staff per 5 impact study sites over the three-year clearance period.
program director per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
college administrator or program directors per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
instructors and faculty per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
SCC4 participants per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period
college staff per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
external constituents per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
20:40 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
91804
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Notices
Alix Gould-Werth,
Chief Evaluation Officer,U.S. Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. 2024–27044 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–HX–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Financial
Report Form ETA–9130
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting this Employment
and Training Administration (ETA)sponsored information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are
invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that the agency
receives on or before December 20,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Howell by telephone at 202–
693–6782, or by email at DOL_PRA_
PUBLIC@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ETA
utilizes the e-Grants Federal Reporting
System, an online 9130 reporting system
for recipients to enter and certify
quarterly financial data. The data
collected is used to assess the
effectiveness of ETA programs and to
monitor and analyze the financial
activity of its recipients. This data
collection format permits ETA to
evaluate program effectiveness, monitor
compliance with statutory limitations,
and analyze financial activity, while
complying with OMB efforts to
streamline Federal financial reporting.
For additional substantive information
about this ICR, see the related notice
published in the Federal Register on
July 15, 2024 (89 FR 57431).
Comments are invited on: (1) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimates of the burden and
cost of the collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information collection; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
This information collection is subject
to the PRA. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless the OMB
approves it and displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number. In addition,
notwithstanding any other provisions of
law, no person shall generally be subject
to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information that does not
display a valid OMB Control Number.
See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
DOL seeks PRA authorization for this
information collection for three (3)
years. OMB authorization for an ICR
cannot be for more than three (3) years
without renewal. The DOL notes that
information collection requirements
submitted to the OMB for existing ICRs
receive a month-to-month extension
while they undergo review.
Agency: DOL–ETA.
Title of Collection: Financial Report
Form ETA–9130.
OMB Control Number: 1205–0461.
Affected Public: State, Local and
Tribal Governments.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 5,400.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 21,600.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
16,200 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $0.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D))
Michael Howell,
Senior Paperwork Reduction Act Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2024–27051 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act Meetings
10:00 a.m., Friday,
November 22, 2024.
PLACE: NCUA Event Center, Lobby, 1775
Duke Street (All visitors must use
TIME AND DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria,
VA 22314–3428
STATUS:
Open.
1. Board
Briefing, NCUA’s 2025–2026 Budget.
MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of
the Board, Telephone: 703–518–6304.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024–27246 Filed 11–18–24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Advisory Committee for Computer and
Information Science and Engineering;
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces the
following meeting:
Name and Committee Code: Advisory
Committee for Computer and
Information Science and Engineering
(#1115) (Hybrid).
Date and Time: December 11, 2024—
12 p.m.–5 p.m. (eastern), December 12,
2024—9 a.m.–1 p.m. (eastern).
Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Room 3430, Alexandria, VA 22314 (InPerson and Virtual).
To attend the meeting virtually,
please send your request for the virtual
meeting link to the following email:
ciseac@nsf.gov.
Type of Meeting: Open.
Contact Persons: KaJuana Mayberry,
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314; Telephone:703–292–8900; email:
ciseac@nsf.gov.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice, recommendations, and counsel
on major goals and policies pertaining
to Computer and Information Science
and Engineering programs and
activities.
Agenda:
• CISE update
• CISE AC subgroup update
• NSF quantum activities
• NSF research security activities
Dated: November 14, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–27056 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91802-91804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27044]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, Strengthening Community Colleges Training
Grant Program Round 4 (SCC4) Evaluation, New Collection
AGENCY: Office of Employment and Training Administration, Chief
Evaluation Office, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on
respondents is properly assessed. Currently, the Department of Labor is
soliciting comments concerning the collection of data for an evaluation
of the fourth round of the Strengthening Community Colleges Training
Grants Program. A copy of the proposed Information Collection Request
(ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the
addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before January 21, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either one of the following
methods:
Email: [email protected]; Mail or Courier: Suchitra
Akmanchi, Chief Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
S-2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. Instructions:
Please submit one copy of your comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the agency name and OMB Control
Number identified above for this information collection. Comments,
including any personal information provided, become a matter of public
record. They will also be summarized and/or included in the request for
OMB approval of the information collection request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suchitra Akmanchi by email at
[email protected] or by phone at (202) 693 8935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) and the Employment
and Training Administration (ETA) in the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
are partnering to commission an evaluation of the fourth round of the
Strengthening Community Colleges Training Grants Program (SCC4). The
program, which awarded grants to sixteen community college grantees,
aims to enable community colleges to adopt and enhance evidence-based
career pathways programs that lead to equitable access to employment
opportunities in good jobs aligned with locally in-demand industries.
The SCC4 evaluation will shed light on which programs are effective for
which types of students, why they are effective, and the core
components that support success. In addition, SCC4 will build on
existing evidence regarding successful programs in community college
settings and advance the understanding of how career pathways programs
promote equitable outcomes. The SCC4 Evaluation includes two
components: (1) an impact study to measure the effects of SCC4 grant
program strategies on participant outcomes and (2) an implementation
study to understand program implementation. The impact study will
include both a quasi-experimental design (QED) and a randomized
controlled trial (RCT) each with a subset of grantees. Impact study
grantees were identified during an evaluability assessment in summer
2024, during which they were assessed on a series of criteria including
the potential number of enrolled students, interest in and feasibility
of random assignment of students to treatment and control service
groups, and a notable difference in the services available to treatment
and control group students. Five community college sites from four
grantees will be included in the RCT portion of the study. Twelve
grantees will be included in the QED study. The implementation study
will include all sixteen grantees and examine the context of SCC4
programs, including how grantees integrate employer perspectives and
student voice to shape programming. The evaluation will occur over four
years (2024 to 2028). The evaluation will rely on rigorous study
procedures and high-quality data. To facilitate these studies, the
evaluation will use several instruments, which will be used during site
visits, phone calls, and surveys with SCC4-involved staff and
participating students.
This Federal Register Notice provides the opportunity to comment on
the following proposed data collection instruments that the evaluation
will use:
Impact Study:
1. Participant baseline survey and consent form. Survey of 6,000
impact study participants to collect basic demographic information,
interest in receiving support services, and current employment and
earnings information.
2. Participant follow-up survey. Follow-up survey of 1,800 impact
study participants focused on job quality, job characteristics, and
overall well-being.
3. Service receipt logs. As part of the impact study data, grantee
staff will track information frequency and type of the services they
provide to participants. Fifteen grantee staff across the five
participating impact study sites, will be responsible for inputting
information into these logs.
Implementation Study:
The implementation study will use the following data collections to
understand the education and economic
[[Page 91803]]
context surrounding the program, the organization and administrative
structure, recruitment and enrollment, partnerships, employer
engagement and work-based learning, integrated academic and career
learning, academic and career counseling, wrap-around services, and
program sustainability.
4. Grantee survey. Survey of a lead contact each of the 16 grantees
to collect program information on service delivery models, staffing,
partnerships, and the implementation of the main program elements.
5. Semi-structured interview guide for college administrators and
program directors. During the two rounds of site visits to impact study
sites and phone calls with non-impact study sites calls, we will
conduct one-on-one or small group, semi-structured interviews with up
to 80 college administrators and program directors.
6. Semi-structured interview guide for instructors and faculty.
During the two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone
calls with non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small
group, semi-structured interviews with up to 64 instructors and faculty
for SCC4 programs.
7. Semi-structured interview guide for SCC4 participants. During
the two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone calls
with non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small group,
semi-structured interviews with up to 64 SCC4 participants.
8. Semi-structured interview guide for college staff. During the
two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone calls with
non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small group,
semi-structured interviews with up to 80 college staff providing
services to SCC4 students, such as staff in student support services or
the admissions office.
9. Semi-structured interview guide for external constituents.
During the two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone
calls with non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small
group, semi-structured interviews with up to 80 external constituents
who may interact with SCC4 students, or support implementation of SCC4
programs, such as employer partners.
II. Desired Focus of Comments: Currently, the Department of Labor
is soliciting comments concerning the above data collection for the
Sectoral Strategies and Employer Engagement Portfolio Program
Evaluation. DOL is particularly interested in comments that do the
following:
[cir] evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
[cir] evaluate the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions;
[cir] enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
[cir] minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology--for example, permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions: At this time, DOL is requesting clearance for
the participant baseline survey and consent form, the participant
follow-up survey, service receipt logs, the grantee survey, and semi-
structured interview guides.
Type of review: New information collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1290-0NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection request; they will also become a
matter of public record.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Frequency of Total number burden per Estimated
Instrument respondents response responses response total annual
(hour) burden (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant baseline survey..... \1\ 6,000 1 6,000 .16 320
Participant follow-up survey.... \2\ 1,800 1 1,800 .33 198
Service receipt logs............ \3\15 2,600 39,000 .05 650
Grantee survey.................. \4\ 16 1 16 .5 3
College administrator and \5\ 80 2 160 .75 40
program director interviews....
Instructors and faculty \6\ 64 2 128 .75 32
interviews.....................
Participant interviews.......... \7\ 64 2 128 .75 32
College staff interviews........ \8\ 80 2 160 .75 32
External constituent interviews. \9\ 80 2 160 .75 40
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 8,199 .............. 47,552 .............. 1,347
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Assumes a total of 6,000 impact study participants over the three-year clearance period.
\2\ Assumes a sample of 6,000 with a 30 percent response rate for a total of 1,800 impact study participants
over the three-year clearance period.
\3\ Assumes 3 staff per 5 impact study sites over the three-year clearance period.
\4\ Assumes 1 program director per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\5\ Assumes 5 college administrator or program directors per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\6\ Assumes 4 instructors and faculty per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\7\ Assumes 4 SCC4 participants per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period
\8\ Assumes 5 college staff per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\9\ Assumes 5 external constituents per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
[[Page 91804]]
Alix Gould-Werth,
Chief Evaluation Officer,U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2024-27044 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-HX-P
