Phosphate Fertilizers From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022, 88960-88961 [2024-26179]
Download as PDF
88960
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices
Panel Review to be published in
accordance with Rule 40. For the
complete Rules, please see https://canmex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreementaccord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/
rules-regles-reglas/article-articlearticulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 44 no later than
30 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Complaint is December 2,
2024);
(b) A Party, an investigating authority
or other interested person who does not
file a Complaint but who intends to
participate in the panel review shall file
a Notice of Appearance in accordance
with Rule 45 no later than 45 days after
the filing of the first Request for Panel
Review (the deadline for filing a Notice
of Appearance is December 16, 2024);
(c) The panel review will be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including challenges to the jurisdiction
of the investigating authority, that are
set out in the Complaints filed in the
panel review and to the procedural and
substantive defenses raised in the panel
review.
Dated: November 5, 2024.
Vidya Desai,
United States Secretary, USMCA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2024–26105 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
United States-Mexico-Canada
Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12:
Binational Panel Review: Notice of
Request for Panel Review
United States Section, USMCA
Secretariat, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of USMCA Request for
Panel Review.
AGENCY:
A Request for Panel Review
was filed on behalf of the Coalition for
Fair Mexican Exports of Aluminum
Extrusions with the United States
Section of the USMCA Secretariat on
November 1, 2024, pursuant to USMCA
Article 10.12. Panel Review was
requested of the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s Final Results in the matter
of Aluminum Extrusions from Mexico:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination. The USMCA Secretariat
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 08, 2024
Jkt 265001
has assigned case number USA–MEX–
2024–10.12–04 to this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vidya Desai, United States Secretary,
USMCA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, 202–482–5438.
The final
determination was published in the
Federal Register on October 3, 2024 (89
FR 80496).
Article 10.12 of chapter 10 of USMCA
provides a dispute settlement
mechanism involving trade remedy
determinations issued by the
Government of the United States, the
Government of Canada, and the
Government of Mexico. Following a
Request for Panel Review, a Binational
Panel is composed to review the trade
remedy determination being challenged
and issue a binding Panel Decision.
There are established USMCA Rules of
Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational
Panel Reviews), which were adopted by
the three governments for panels
requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of
USMCA which requires Requests for
Panel Review to be published in
accordance with Rule 40. For the
complete Rules, please see https://canmex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreementaccord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/
rules-regles-reglas/article-articlearticulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 44 no later than
30 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Complaint is December 2,
2024);
(b) A Party, an investigating authority
or other interested person who does not
file a Complaint but who intends to
participate in the panel review shall file
a Notice of Appearance in accordance
with Rule 45 no later than 45 days after
the filing of the first Request for Panel
Review (the deadline for filing a Notice
of Appearance is December 16, 2024);
(c) The panel review will be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including challenges to the jurisdiction
of the investigating authority, that are
set out in the Complaints filed in the
panel review and to the procedural and
substantive defenses raised in the panel
review.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 5, 2024.
Vidya Desai,
United States Secretary, USMCA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2024–26102 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–821–825]
Phosphate Fertilizers From the
Russian Federation: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC
Apatit), a producer/exporter of
phosphate fertilizers from the Russian
Federation (Russia), received
countervailable subsidies during the
period of review (POR), January 1, 2022,
through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Subler or William Horn, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6241 or (202) 482–4868,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the preliminary
results of this administrative review on
May 4, 2024.1 On July 22, 2024,
Commerce tolled certain deadlines in
this administrative proceeding by seven
days.2 On August 13, 2024, Commerce
extended the deadline for the final
results of this administrative review
until November 5, 2024.3 For a
description of the events that occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 We
conducted this review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
1 See Phosphate Fertilizers from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 35794 (May 4,
2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated August 13, 2024.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Phosphate Fertilizers from the Russian Federation;
2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2024 / Notices
Scope of the Order 5
The products covered by this Order
are phosphate fertilizers. For a complete
description of the scope of this Order,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties’
case briefs are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum
accompanying this notice. A list of the
issues raised by parties, and to which
Commerce responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, is provided in
the appendix to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.
trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding the Preliminary
Results, and for the reasons explained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
we made certain revisions to the
subsidy calculations for JSC Apatit.
These changes are explained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an
individual net countervailable subsidy
rate for JSC Apatit. Commerce
determines that, during the POR, the net
countervailable subsidy rate for the
company under review is as follows:
Company
Subsidy rate
(percent ad valorem)
Joint Stock Company Apatit 6 ......
18.21
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the
calculations performed for these final
5 See Phosphate Fertilizers from the Kingdom of
Morocco and the Russian Federation:
Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 18037 (April 7,
2021) (Order).
6 As discussed in the Preliminary Results PDM,
Commerce finds the following companies to be
cross-owned with JSC Apatit: PhosAgro Public Joint
Stock Company; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Region; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Belgorod; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Don; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Kuban; Limited Liability Company
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 08, 2024
Jkt 265001
results of review within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review, for the
above-listed company at the applicable
ad valorem assessment rate. We intend
to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed with the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Rates
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the
amount shown for JSC Apatit on
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review. For all
nonreviewed firms, we will instruct
CBP to continue to collect cash deposits
of estimated countervailing duties at the
all-others rate or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate The cash
deposit requirement, effective upon the
publication of the final results of this
review, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the
return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
PhosAgro-Lipetsk; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Kursk; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Orel; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Stavropol; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Volga; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-SeveroZapad; Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Tambov; and Limited Liability Company
PhosAgro-Sibir. See Preliminary Results PDM at 7–
8.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
88961
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
V. Subsidies Valuation
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Provision of Mining Rights for Less Than
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR)
Comment 1a: Whether Commerce Selected
a Benchmark Reflective of Prevailing
Market Conditions and Consistent with
Market Principles
Comment 1b: Whether Eurostat Data Are
the Most Representative Benchmark Data
Available to Commerce
Comment 1c: Whether Commerce Should
Expand Its Selected Data to Calculate a
More Representative Benchmark If It
Continues to Use Global Trade Atlas
(GTA) Data
Comment 1d: Whether Commerce Should
Include All Exports from South Africa in
Its Benchmark
Comment 1e: Whether Commerce Should
Account for Additional Expenses
Incurred in the Production and Sale of
Phosphate Rock When Calculating a
Profit Ratio
Comment 1f: Whether Commerce Should
Countervail Mining Licenses Obtained
Prior to the April 1, 2002, Cut-Off Date
Provision of Natural Gas for LTAR
Comment 2a: Whether Commerce Should
Reject Kazakh Export Data as a Natural
Gas Benchmark and Use European
International Energy Agency (IEA) Data
Instead
Comment 2b: Whether Commerce Should
Countervail JSC Apatit’s Natural Gas
Purchases from Independent Suppliers
Comment 2c: Whether the Provision of
Natural Gas is Specific
Other Program-Specific Issues
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Properly
Determined that the Vologda Region’s
Support of Industrial Development (SID)
Program Is De Facto Specific
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Erred in
Its Selection of a Benchmark for One of
JSC Apatit’s Loans Under the Corporate
Competitiveness Improvement Program
(CCIP)
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–26179 Filed 11–8–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88960-88961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26179]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-821-825]
Phosphate Fertilizers From the Russian Federation: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Joint Stock Company Apatit (JSC Apatit), a producer/exporter of
phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation (Russia), received
countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), January 1,
2022, through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Subler or William Horn, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6241 or (202)
482-4868, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the preliminary results of this administrative
review on May 4, 2024.\1\ On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain
deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.\2\ On August
13, 2024, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this
administrative review until November 5, 2024.\3\ For a description of
the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.\4\ We conducted this review in accordance with
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Phosphate Fertilizers from the Russian Federation:
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 35794 (May 4, 2024)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated August 13, 2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Phosphate Fertilizers from the Russian Federation; 2022,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 88961]]
Scope of the Order 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Phosphate Fertilizers from the Kingdom of Morocco and
the Russian Federation: Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 18037
(April 7, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by this Order are phosphate fertilizers. For a
complete description of the scope of this Order, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties' case briefs are addressed
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accompanying this notice. A list
of the issues raised by parties, and to which Commerce responded in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided in the appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, and for the
reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made
certain revisions to the subsidy calculations for JSC Apatit. These
changes are explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an
individual net countervailable subsidy rate for JSC Apatit. Commerce
determines that, during the POR, the net countervailable subsidy rate
for the company under review is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate (percent ad
Company valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joint Stock Company Apatit \6\................ 18.21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As discussed in the Preliminary Results PDM, Commerce finds
the following companies to be cross-owned with JSC Apatit: PhosAgro
Public Joint Stock Company; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-
Region; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-Belgorod; Limited
Liability Company PhosAgro-Don; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-
Kuban; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-Lipetsk; Limited Liability
Company PhosAgro-Kursk; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-Orel;
Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-Stavropol; Limited Liability
Company PhosAgro-Volga; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-
SeveroZapad; Limited Liability Company PhosAgro-Tambov; and Limited
Liability Company PhosAgro-Sibir. See Preliminary Results PDM at 7-
8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these
final results of review within five days of the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review, for the above-listed company at the applicable ad valorem
assessment rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed
with the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions
will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for
parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Rates
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends
to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amount shown for JSC Apatit on shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP
to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties
at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate
applicable to the company, as appropriate The cash deposit requirement,
effective upon the publication of the final results of this review,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
V. Subsidies Valuation
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Provision of Mining Rights for Less Than Adequate Remuneration
(LTAR)
Comment 1a: Whether Commerce Selected a Benchmark Reflective of
Prevailing Market Conditions and Consistent with Market Principles
Comment 1b: Whether Eurostat Data Are the Most Representative
Benchmark Data Available to Commerce
Comment 1c: Whether Commerce Should Expand Its Selected Data to
Calculate a More Representative Benchmark If It Continues to Use
Global Trade Atlas (GTA) Data
Comment 1d: Whether Commerce Should Include All Exports from
South Africa in Its Benchmark
Comment 1e: Whether Commerce Should Account for Additional
Expenses Incurred in the Production and Sale of Phosphate Rock When
Calculating a Profit Ratio
Comment 1f: Whether Commerce Should Countervail Mining Licenses
Obtained Prior to the April 1, 2002, Cut-Off Date
Provision of Natural Gas for LTAR
Comment 2a: Whether Commerce Should Reject Kazakh Export Data as
a Natural Gas Benchmark and Use European International Energy Agency
(IEA) Data Instead
Comment 2b: Whether Commerce Should Countervail JSC Apatit's
Natural Gas Purchases from Independent Suppliers
Comment 2c: Whether the Provision of Natural Gas is Specific
Other Program-Specific Issues
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Properly Determined that the Vologda
Region's Support of Industrial Development (SID) Program Is De Facto
Specific
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Erred in Its Selection of a
Benchmark for One of JSC Apatit's Loans Under the Corporate
Competitiveness Improvement Program (CCIP)
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-26179 Filed 11-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P