Polyester Textured Yarn From Indonesia: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination; Notice of Amended Order, 88725-88726 [2024-25963]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Notices
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Review
[A–560–838]
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Order
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail are up to 119.02
percent.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to APO of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a).
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing, and publishing notice
of, the results of this sunset review in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and
351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: November 4, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping
Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–26024 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Polyester Textured Yarn From
Indonesia: Notice of Court Decision
Not in Harmony With the Final
Determination of Antidumping
Investigation; Notice of Amended Final
Determination; Notice of Amended
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2024, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued its final judgment in PT. Asia
Pacific Fibers Tbk. v. United States and
Unifi Manufacturing, Inc. and Nan Ya
Plastics Corporation, Court no. 22–
00007, sustaining the U.S. Department
of Commerce’s (Commerce) remand
determination pertaining to the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation on
Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia
covering the period October 1, 2019,
through September 30, 2020. Commerce
is notifying the public that the CIT’s
final judgment is not in harmony with
Commerce’s final determination in the
investigation, and Commerce is
amending the final determination and
the resulting AD order with respect to
the dumping margins assigned to PT.
Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk (Asia Pacific)
and all other producers and exporters of
subject merchandise.
DATES: Applicable October 21, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Shaw, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0697.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
17:38 Nov 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
AD order on polyester textured yarn
from Indonesia.2
Asia Pacific appealed Commerce’s
Final Determination. On December 12,
2023, the CIT remanded the Final
Determination.3 Specifically, the CIT
remanded to Commerce to prepare a
verification report and to provide Asia
Pacific a reasonable opportunity to
place information on the record
addressing any deficiencies found by
Commerce in the respondent’s
verification questionnaire responses and
all parties the opportunity to file case
briefs.4
In its final remand redetermination,
issued August 8, 2024, Commerce
reconsidered its Final Determination,
determining that AFA was no longer
warranted for Asia Pacific and
recalculated the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for Asia
Pacific.5 The CIT sustained Commerce’s
final redetermination.6 Asia Pacific’s
dumping margin is now 9.20 percent.
Consequently, the dumping margin
applicable to all other companies has
changed and is now 8.72 percent.
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,7 as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades,8 the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Commerce must publish a
notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
October 11, 2024, judgment constitutes
a final decision of the CIT that is not in
harmony with Commerce’s Final
Determination and Order. Thus, this
notice is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Background
On October 25, 2021, Commerce
published its Final Determination in the
LTFV investigation of Polyester
Textured Yarn from Indonesia.1
Commerce concluded that Asia Pacific
failed to cooperate to the best of its
ability and thus determined the use of
an adverse inference in selecting from
among the facts available (AFA) was
warranted in determining the rate for
Asia Pacific. Commerce subsequently
published in the Federal Register the
1 See Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia:
Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value, 86 FR 58875 (October 25, 2021)
(Final Determination), and accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
88725
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 See Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia,
Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 71031
(December 14, 2021) (Order).
3 See PT. Asia Pac. Fibers TBK v. United States,
673 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (CIT 2023).
4 Id., 673 F. Supp. 3d at 1333.
5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand, PT. Asia Pacific Fibers TBK v.
United States, 673 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (CIT 2023),
dated August 8, 2024 (Final Remand), at 6,
available at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FinalRemandRedetermination.aspx.
6 See PT. Asia Pac. Fibers TBK v. United States,
No. 22–00007, Slip Op. 24–113 (CIT October 11,
2024).
7 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
8 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
88726
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Notices
Notification to Interested Parties
Amended Final Determination and
Order
Because there is now a final court
judgment, Commerce is amending its
Final Determination and Order to revise
the dumping margins assigned to Asia
Pacific and all other producers and
exporters of subject merchandise, as
follows:
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(c) and
(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 4, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–25963 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Producer or exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
PT. Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk ..
All Others ..............................
9.20
8.72
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because Asia Pacific does not have a
superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there
have been no final results published in
a subsequent review of Asia Pacific, and
because of the change to the rate
assigned to all other producers and
exporters of subject merchandise,
Commerce will issue revised cash
deposit instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains
enjoined by CIT order from liquidating
entries that were produced or exported
by Asia Pacific, that were subject of
Commerce’s Final Determination, and
subject to the Order, and that were
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the periods of
June 3, 2021 through November 29,
2021 and December 13, 2021 through
November 30, 2022. These entries will
remain enjoined pursuant to the terms
of the injunction during the pendency of
any appeals process.
In the event the CIT’s ruling is not
appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a
final and conclusive court decision,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on
unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise produced by or exported
by Asia Pacific in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
investigation when the importer-specific
ad valorem assessment rate is not zero
or de minimis. Where an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is
zero or de minimis,9 we will instruct
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
9 See
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Nov 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–916]
Laminated Woven Sacks From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Expedited Third Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited
sunset review, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) order on laminated woven sacks
(LWS) from the People’s Republic of
China (China) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Sunset Review’’ section of
this notice.
DATES: Applicable November 8, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2953.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 7, 2008, Commerce
published the AD order on LWS from
China.1 On July 1, 2024, Commerce
published the notice of initiation of the
five-year sunset review of the Order,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On
July 12, 2024, Commerce received a
notice of intent to participate in this
review from the Laminated Woven
Sacks Fair Trade Coalition and its
individual members, Polytex Fibers LLC
and ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
(collectively, domestic interested
parties), within the deadline specified
1 See Notice of Antidumping Order: Laminated
Woven Sacks from the People’s Republic of China,
73 FR 14772 (August 7, 2008) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89
FR 54435 (July 1, 2024).
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers of
domestic like product in the United
States, and under sections 771(9)(E) and
(F) of the Act as a trade association, a
majority of whose members are
producers of a domestic like product in
the United States. On July 22, 2024,
Commerce tolled certain deadlines in
this administrative proceeding by seven
days.4 The deadline for these final
results is November 5, 2024.
On July 31, 2024, the domestic
interested parties provided a timely
substantive response for this review
within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 We received
no substantive responses from any other
interested parties, nor was a hearing
requested. On August 21, 2024,
Commerce notified the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that it did not receive an adequate
substantive response from respondent
interested parties.6 As a result, pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of this Order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this Order
is LWS. For a complete description of
the scope of the Order, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.7
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review,
including the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping in the event
of revocation and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the order
were revoked, are addressed in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of topics discussed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is included as an
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Notice
of Intent to Participate,’’ dated July 12, 2024.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
5 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Domestic Interested
Parties Substantive Response,’’ dated July 31, 2024
(Substantive Response).
6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for
July 2024,’’ dated August 21, 2024.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Second Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s Republic
of China’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with these results and hereby
adopted by this notice.
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88725-88726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25963]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-560-838]
Polyester Textured Yarn From Indonesia: Notice of Court Decision
Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of Antidumping
Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination; Notice of Amended
Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 11, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) issued its final judgment in PT. Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk. v.
United States and Unifi Manufacturing, Inc. and Nan Ya Plastics
Corporation, Court no. 22-00007, sustaining the U.S. Department of
Commerce's (Commerce) remand determination pertaining to the less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation on Polyester Textured Yarn from
Indonesia covering the period October 1, 2019, through September 30,
2020. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is
not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in the
investigation, and Commerce is amending the final determination and the
resulting AD order with respect to the dumping margins assigned to PT.
Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk (Asia Pacific) and all other producers and
exporters of subject merchandise.
DATES: Applicable October 21, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Shaw, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0697.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 25, 2021, Commerce published its Final Determination in
the LTFV investigation of Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia.\1\
Commerce concluded that Asia Pacific failed to cooperate to the best of
its ability and thus determined the use of an adverse inference in
selecting from among the facts available (AFA) was warranted in
determining the rate for Asia Pacific. Commerce subsequently published
in the Federal Register the AD order on polyester textured yarn from
Indonesia.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia: Final
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 86 FR
58875 (October 25, 2021) (Final Determination), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Polyester Textured Yarn from Indonesia, Malaysia,
Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 86 FR 71031 (December 14, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asia Pacific appealed Commerce's Final Determination. On December
12, 2023, the CIT remanded the Final Determination.\3\ Specifically,
the CIT remanded to Commerce to prepare a verification report and to
provide Asia Pacific a reasonable opportunity to place information on
the record addressing any deficiencies found by Commerce in the
respondent's verification questionnaire responses and all parties the
opportunity to file case briefs.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See PT. Asia Pac. Fibers TBK v. United States, 673 F. Supp.
3d 1320 (CIT 2023).
\4\ Id., 673 F. Supp. 3d at 1333.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its final remand redetermination, issued August 8, 2024,
Commerce reconsidered its Final Determination, determining that AFA was
no longer warranted for Asia Pacific and recalculated the estimated
weighted-average dumping margin for Asia Pacific.\5\ The CIT sustained
Commerce's final redetermination.\6\ Asia Pacific's dumping margin is
now 9.20 percent. Consequently, the dumping margin applicable to all
other companies has changed and is now 8.72 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, PT. Asia Pacific Fibers TBK v. United States, 673 F. Supp.
3d 1320 (CIT 2023), dated August 8, 2024 (Final Remand), at 6,
available at https://access.trade.gov/public/FinalRemandRedetermination.aspx.
\6\ See PT. Asia Pac. Fibers TBK v. United States, No. 22-00007,
Slip Op. 24-113 (CIT October 11, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\7\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\8\
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant
to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's October 11,
2024, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in
harmony with Commerce's Final Determination and Order. Thus, this
notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of
Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\8\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 88726]]
Amended Final Determination and Order
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Determination and Order to revise the dumping margins
assigned to Asia Pacific and all other producers and exporters of
subject merchandise, as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer or exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT. Asia Pacific Fibers Tbk............................. 9.20
All Others.............................................. 8.72
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because Asia Pacific does not have a superseding cash deposit rate,
i.e., there have been no final results published in a subsequent review
of Asia Pacific, and because of the change to the rate assigned to all
other producers and exporters of subject merchandise, Commerce will
issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP).
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from
liquidating entries that were produced or exported by Asia Pacific,
that were subject of Commerce's Final Determination, and subject to the
Order, and that were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the periods of June 3, 2021 through November 29,
2021 and December 13, 2021 through November 30, 2022. These entries
will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the
pendency of any appeals process.
In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed,
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of
subject merchandise produced by or exported by Asia Pacific in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
investigation when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is
not zero or de minimis. Where an importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,\9\ we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 4, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-25963 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P