Certain Electronic Eyewear Products and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to the Remaining Respondent Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation, 86837 [2024-25379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2024 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1383]
Certain Electronic Eyewear Products
and Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Decision Not To Review
an Initial Determination Terminating
the Investigation as to the Remaining
Respondent Based on Settlement;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 71) of the presiding
Administrative Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting an unopposed motion to
terminate the investigation as to the
remaining respondent Magic Leap, Inc.
of Plantation, Florida (‘‘Settling
Respondent’’) based on settlement,
thereby terminating the investigation in
its entirety. The investigation is
terminated.
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 27, 2023, the Commission
instituted this investigation under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), based on a complaint filed by
Ingeniospec, LLC (‘‘Ingeniospec’’) of San
Jose, California. See 88 FR 89465–66
(Dec. 27, 2023). The complaint alleges a
violation of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain electronic eyewear products and
components thereof by reason of the
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 8,770,742; 10,310,296;
11,762,224 (‘‘the ’224 patent’’); and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Oct 30, 2024
Jkt 265001
11,803,069 (‘‘the ’069 patent’’). See id.
In addition to the Settling Respondents,
the notice of investigation names the
following respondents: Ampere LLC,
Ampere Technologies, and GGTR LLC,
all of Dover, Delaware; Gogotoro LLC of
Brooklyn, New York; Zhuhai Wicue
Technology Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China;
Bose Corporation of Framingham,
Massachusetts; Epson America, Inc. of
Los Alamitos, California; Seiko Epson
Corporation of Nagano, Japan;
Everysight Ltd. of Haifa, Israel;
Everysight US Inc. of New York, New
York; Quanta Computer Incorporated of
Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Lenovo (United
States), Inc. of Morrisville, North
Carolina; Lenovo Group Limited of
Hong Kong, China; Lenovo Information
Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of
Shenzhen, China; Lucyd Ltd. of London,
United Kingdom; Innovative Eyewear,
Inc. of North Miami, Florida; Luxottica
Group S.p.A. of Milan, Italy; Luxottica
of America, Inc. of Mason, Ohio; Razer
Inc. and Razer USA Ltd., both of Irvine,
California; TCL Technology Group
Corporation of Huizhou, China; TCL
Electronics Holdings Limited of Hong
Kong, China; Falcon Innovation
Technology, (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of
Shenzhen, China; ThirdEye Gen, Inc. of
Princeton, New Jersey; Vuzix
Corporation of West Henrietta, New
York; XREAL, Inc. of Sunnyvale,
California; EXREAL Technology Limited
of Hong Kong, China; and Matrixed
Reality Technology Co., Ltd. of Wuxi,
China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations is not a party to the
investigation. Id.
The Commission previously
terminated all respondents other than
the Settling Respondent. See Order No.
17 (Jan. 31, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Feb. 29, 2024); Order
No. 18 (Feb. 2, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Mar. 4, 2024); Order
No. 24 (Feb. 27, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Mar. 21, 2024); Order
No. 28 (Mar. 4, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Mar. 21, 2024); Order
No. 35 (Mar. 20, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Apr. 17, 2024); Order
No. 37 (Mar. 21, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Apr. 17, 2024); Order
No. 39 (Apr. 1, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Apr. 26, 2024); Order
No. 47 (May 10, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (May 22, 2024); Order
No. 56 (June 20, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (July 8, 2024); Order No.
57 (June 20, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (July 8, 2024); Order No.
69 (Sept. 19, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Oct. 8, 2024).
On July 8, 2024, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to the
’069 patent in its entirety, as well as
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
86837
claims 29, 30, 32, 40–42, and 48 of the
’224 patent, based on partial withdrawal
of the complaint. See Order No. 57 (June
20, 2024), unreviewed by Comm’n
Notice (July 8, 2024).
On September 27, 2024, complainant
Ingeniospec and the Settling
Respondent filed a joint motion
(‘‘Motion’’) to terminate the
investigation as to the Settling
Respondent based on settlement, to stay
the procedural deadlines as to the
Settling Respondent, and to limit
service of the settlement agreement.
On October 9, 2024, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 71) granting
the Motion. Pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)), the
ID notes that ‘‘public and confidential
versions of the settlement agreement
between Ingeniospec and [the Settling
Respondent] were attached to the
motion.’’ ID at 2. The ID also notes that
‘‘the motion contains a statement that
there are no other agreements, written or
oral, express or implied between the
parties concerning the subject matter of
the investigation.’’ Id. The ID further
finds, pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), that
termination of the Settling Respondent
from the investigation will not adversely
affect the public interest. See id. The
ALJ further granted the request to limit
service of the confidential version of the
settlement agreement. See id. Because
the Settling Respondent is the last
remaining respondent in the
investigation, the ID also terminates the
investigation in its entirety. See id. at 3.
No petition for review of the subject
ID was filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. The
investigation is terminated as to the
Settling Respondent and in its entirety.
The Commission’s vote for this
determination took place on October 28,
2024.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 28, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–25379 Filed 10–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 86837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25379]
[[Page 86837]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1383]
Certain Electronic Eyewear Products and Components Thereof;
Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation as to the Remaining Respondent Based on
Settlement; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 71) of the presiding Administrative Law Judge
(``ALJ'') granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation
as to the remaining respondent Magic Leap, Inc. of Plantation, Florida
(``Settling Respondent'') based on settlement, thereby terminating the
investigation in its entirety. The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 27, 2023, the Commission
instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based on a
complaint filed by Ingeniospec, LLC (``Ingeniospec'') of San Jose,
California. See 88 FR 89465-66 (Dec. 27, 2023). The complaint alleges a
violation of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain electronic eyewear products and components
thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent
Nos. 8,770,742; 10,310,296; 11,762,224 (``the '224 patent''); and
11,803,069 (``the '069 patent''). See id. In addition to the Settling
Respondents, the notice of investigation names the following
respondents: Ampere LLC, Ampere Technologies, and GGTR LLC, all of
Dover, Delaware; Gogotoro LLC of Brooklyn, New York; Zhuhai Wicue
Technology Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Bose Corporation of Framingham,
Massachusetts; Epson America, Inc. of Los Alamitos, California; Seiko
Epson Corporation of Nagano, Japan; Everysight Ltd. of Haifa, Israel;
Everysight US Inc. of New York, New York; Quanta Computer Incorporated
of Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Lenovo (United States), Inc. of Morrisville,
North Carolina; Lenovo Group Limited of Hong Kong, China; Lenovo
Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Lucyd
Ltd. of London, United Kingdom; Innovative Eyewear, Inc. of North
Miami, Florida; Luxottica Group S.p.A. of Milan, Italy; Luxottica of
America, Inc. of Mason, Ohio; Razer Inc. and Razer USA Ltd., both of
Irvine, California; TCL Technology Group Corporation of Huizhou, China;
TCL Electronics Holdings Limited of Hong Kong, China; Falcon Innovation
Technology, (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; ThirdEye Gen, Inc.
of Princeton, New Jersey; Vuzix Corporation of West Henrietta, New
York; XREAL, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California; EXREAL Technology Limited
of Hong Kong, China; and Matrixed Reality Technology Co., Ltd. of Wuxi,
China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not a party to
the investigation. Id.
The Commission previously terminated all respondents other than the
Settling Respondent. See Order No. 17 (Jan. 31, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (Feb. 29, 2024); Order No. 18 (Feb. 2, 2024), unreviewed
by Comm'n Notice (Mar. 4, 2024); Order No. 24 (Feb. 27, 2024),
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Mar. 21, 2024); Order No. 28 (Mar. 4,
2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Mar. 21, 2024); Order No. 35 (Mar.
20, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Apr. 17, 2024); Order No. 37
(Mar. 21, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Apr. 17, 2024); Order No.
39 (Apr. 1, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Apr. 26, 2024); Order
No. 47 (May 10, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May 22, 2024);
Order No. 56 (June 20, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (July 8,
2024); Order No. 57 (June 20, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (July
8, 2024); Order No. 69 (Sept. 19, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice
(Oct. 8, 2024).
On July 8, 2024, the Commission terminated the investigation as to
the '069 patent in its entirety, as well as claims 29, 30, 32, 40-42,
and 48 of the '224 patent, based on partial withdrawal of the
complaint. See Order No. 57 (June 20, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n
Notice (July 8, 2024).
On September 27, 2024, complainant Ingeniospec and the Settling
Respondent filed a joint motion (``Motion'') to terminate the
investigation as to the Settling Respondent based on settlement, to
stay the procedural deadlines as to the Settling Respondent, and to
limit service of the settlement agreement.
On October 9, 2024, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 71)
granting the Motion. Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR
210.21(b)), the ID notes that ``public and confidential versions of the
settlement agreement between Ingeniospec and [the Settling Respondent]
were attached to the motion.'' ID at 2. The ID also notes that ``the
motion contains a statement that there are no other agreements, written
or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning the subject
matter of the investigation.'' Id. The ID further finds, pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), that termination of
the Settling Respondent from the investigation will not adversely
affect the public interest. See id. The ALJ further granted the request
to limit service of the confidential version of the settlement
agreement. See id. Because the Settling Respondent is the last
remaining respondent in the investigation, the ID also terminates the
investigation in its entirety. See id. at 3.
No petition for review of the subject ID was filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The
investigation is terminated as to the Settling Respondent and in its
entirety.
The Commission's vote for this determination took place on October
28, 2024.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 28, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-25379 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P