Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend FLEX Floor Trading Rules, 86007-86019 [2024-25052]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
BX–2024–041 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–BX–2024–041. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–BX–2024–041 and should be
submitted on or before November 19,
2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.49
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–25050 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–101413; File No. SR–Phlx–
2024–51]
86007
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
FLEX Floor Trading Rules
October 23, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
8, 2024, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 8, Section 34, FLEX Trading.3
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/phlx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
49 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Phlx Options 8, Section 34 rule text was
previously amended by two rule changes which are
effective, but not yet operative. These two prior rule
changes will be implemented at the same time as
the rule changes proposed herein. See Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 97658 (June 7, 2023), 88
FR 38562 (June 13, 2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–22); and
100321 (June 12, 2024), 89 FR 51580 (June 18, 2024)
(SR–Phlx–2024–24). Phlx further delayed the
implementation so that it could implement SR–
Phlx–2023–22 while also completing an OCC
industry rule change prior.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 8, Section 34, FLEX Trading.
The Exchange also proposes a technical
amendment to Options 8, Section 33,
Accommodation Transactions.
Options 8, Section 34
FLEX Options are customized equity,
index, and currency contracts that allow
investors to tailor contract terms for
exchange-listed equity and index
options. By way of background, in 2023,
the Exchange filed a rule change to
amend the manner in which FLEX
Options are transacted on Phlx’s
Trading Floor.4 Thereafter, the
Exchange filed to delay the
implementation of SR–Phlx–2023–22 to
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97658
(June 7, 2023), 88 FR 38562 (June 13, 2023) (SR–
Phlx–2023–22) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Various Options 8 Rules). SR–Phlx–2023–22
amended FLEX Orders in 3 ways. First, the
Exchange amended the rules to require FLEX
Orders to be reported into Phlx’s Options Floor
Based Management System or ‘‘FBMS,’’ thereby
further automating the execution and reporting of
FLEX Options. All executed FLEX contracts will be
reported to OPRA and sent to the OCC for clearing,
similar to all other equity, equity index and U.S.
dollar-settled foreign currency options orders
executed on the Exchange’s trading floor. Second,
the Exchange removed its RFQ process including
the BBO Improvement Interval Process, with the
rule change. Third, the Exchange reorganized
Options 8, Section 34 to restructure the rule to
include additional information which describes
current FLEX trading on Phlx. With respect to
Cabinet Orders, SR–Phlx–2023–22 amended
Options 8, Section 33 to require Cabinet Orders to
be reported into FBMS. With this change, members
and member organizations will be required to
record all Cabinet Orders represented in the trading
crowd into FBMS. All executed contracts will be
reported to OPRA and sent to OCC for clearing
similar to all other equity, equity index and U.S.
dollar-settled foreign currency options orders
executed on the Exchange’s trading floor.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
86008
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
on or before August 30, 2024.5 Finally,
in 2024, Phlx filed a rule change to
amend FLEX Options rules at Options 8,
Section 34(b) and further delay the
implementation of SR–Phlx–2023–22 to
the end of Q4 2025.6 At this time, the
Exchange proposes to further amend the
rules proposed in SR–Phlx–2023–22
and SR–Phx–2024–24, which are
immediately effective, but not yet
operative. The Exchange proposes to
implement the amendments in Phlx–
2023–22 and SR–Phx–2024–24 at the
same time as the proposed amendments.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
(1) clarify the Options 8, Section 34
functionality that will be available with
the implementation of SR–Phlx–2023–
22 and SR–Phx–2024–24; (2) list p.m.settled FLEX Index Options whose
exercise settlement value is derived
from closing prices on the last trading
day prior to expiration that expire on or
within two business days of a third
Friday-of-the-month expiration day for a
non-FLEX Option; and (2) permit FLEX
Options on certain Exchange-Traded
Funds (‘‘ETFs’’) to be settled by delivery
in cash if the underlying security meets
prescribed criteria. Each change will be
described below.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Options 8, Section 34
First, the Exchange proposes to
capitalize certain terms uniformly
throughout Options 8, Section 34. The
Exchange proposes to capitalize the
following terms: ‘‘FLEX Options,’’
‘‘FLEX Equity Options,’’ ‘‘FLEX Index
Options,’’ and ‘‘FLEX Currency
Options.’’ The Exchange proposes to
amend Options 8, Section 34(f)(4) to
define FLEX U. S. dollar-settled foreign
currency options as ‘‘FLEX Currency
Options.’’
Second, the Exchange proposes to
exclude iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
(‘‘IBIT’’) from trading as a FLEX
Options.
Third, the Exchange proposes to
adopt a new Options 8, Section
34(f)(1)(B) to state, ‘‘an underlying
equity security or index, as applicable
(the index multiplier for FLEX Index
Options is 100).’’ This proposed rule
text reflects the current characteristics
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98919
(November 13, 2023), 88 FR 80363 (November 13,
2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–48) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Delay the Implementation of the FLEX and
Cabinet Automation).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100321
(June 12, 2024), 89 FR 51580 (June 18, 2024) (SR–
Phlx–2024–24) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Delay
Implementation of Certain Exchange Options 8
Rules and Amend Options 8, Section 34(b)). Phlx
further delayed the implementation so that it could
implement SR–Phlx–2023–22 while also
completing an OCC industry rule change prior.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
of underlying interest for FLEX Option.
The proposed rule text brings greater
clarity to the Rule.
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to
amend the language in Options 8,
Section 34(f)(3) which was initially
amended to state, ‘‘The Exchange may
determine the smallest increment for
exercise prices of FLEX Options not to
exceed two decimal places.’’ While not
substantively amending the exercise
price, the Exchange proposes to amend
this sentence to state, ‘‘The Exchange
may determine the smallest increment
for exercise prices of FLEX Options on
a class-by-class basis without going
lower than the $0.01.’’ The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule text
brings greater clarity to Phlx’s rule text
and is consistent with rule text in Cboe
Rule 5.3(e)(3).7
Fifth, the Exchange proposes to
amend the language in Options 8,
Section 34(f)(5) to provide, ‘‘The
expiration date may be any business day
(specified to the day, month, and year)
no more than 15 years from the date on
which an executed FLEX equity and
index option is submitted to the System
and no more than 3 years from the date
on which an executed FLEX currency
option is submitted to the System with
exercise settlement value on the
expiration date determined by reference
to the reported level of the index as
derived from the opening prices of the
component securities (‘‘a.m.
settlement’’) or closing prices (‘‘p.m.
settlement’’).’’ 8 This amendment aligns
the rule text related to settlement style
required for a complex FLEX Order leg
with rule text in Cboe 4.21(b)(4). The
Exchange notes that Cboe recently
received approval of its pilot program
that permitted it to list p.m.-settled
FLEX Index Options whose exercise
settlement value is derived from closing
prices on the last trading day prior to
expiration that expire on or within two
business days of a third Friday-of-themonth expiration day for a non-FLEX
Option (‘‘FLEX PM Third Friday
Options’’).9 Consistent with the
7 Of note, the Exchange is not proposing to
provide for Micro FLEX Index Options or to allow
prices to be expressed as a percentage value, similar
to Cboe, because the Exchange does not offer these
features today.
8 The Exchange would remove the rule text in
current Options 8, Section 34 (f)(5) that provides,
‘‘except that (i) a FLEX index option that expires
on or within two business days prior or subsequent
to a third Friday-of-the-month expiration day for a
non-FLEX option (except quarterly expiring index
options) or underlying currency may only have an.’’
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222
(December 21, 2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28,
2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–018) (‘‘FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval’’). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review
of pilot data during the course of the pilot program
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission’s approval of Cboe’s
proposal, the Exchange is proposing to
allow the listing of FLEX PM Third
Friday Options on Phlx as well, and will
align with Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(B)(ii).10
Sixth, the Exchange proposes to restyle Options 8, Section 34(f)(6) to
change the title from ‘‘Settlement’’ to
‘‘Settlement type.’’ The Exchange also
proposes to add a title at (A), ‘‘FLEX
Equity Options.’’ At proposed Options
8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(1) the Exchange
proposes to add rule text to state ‘‘FLEX
Options, other than as permitted in
subparagraph (2) below, are settled with
physical delivery of the underlying
security.’’ The Exchange proposes to
also introduce FLEX Equity Options that
are cash-settled in proposed Options 8,
Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2). The Exchange
will discuss cash-settled FLEX Equity
Options in greater detail below. The
Exchange proposes to amend Options 8,
Section 34(f)(6)(A) to add a title for
FLEX Index Options at (B) and change
the current rule text 11 to instead
provide that FLEX Index Options may
be specified as the index value reported
at the
(1) close (P.M.-settled); and (with exercise
settlement value determined by reference to
the reported level of the index derived from
the reported closing prices of the component
securities);
(2) opening (A.M.-settled) of trading on the
Exchange (with exercise settlement value
determined by reference to the reported level
of the index derived from the reported
opening prices of the component securities).
While not substantively amending the
rule text, the Exchange believes that the
proposed text adds clarity by noting
how the exercise value is determined
depending on whether the option is
a.m.-settled or p.m.-settled. The
Exchange proposes to add a title ‘‘FLEX
Currency Options’’ to new Options 8,
Section 34(f)(6)(C). The Exchange also
and a study by the Commission’s Division of
Economic and Risk Analysis (‘‘DERA’’) staff. See
FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
10 Currently, the only broad-based index option
that would be able to list as a FLEX PM Third
Friday Option is the Nasdaq-100 Index option
(‘‘NDX’’ or ‘‘NDX options’’). The Exchange also
received approval to list a third-Friday-of-themonth p.m. expiration on its standardized market.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98950
(November 15, 2023), 88 FR 81172 (November 21,
2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–45) (Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Permit the Listing and
Trading of P.M.-Settled Nasdaq-100 Index Options
With a Third-Friday-of-the-Month Expiration).
11 Initially, the Exchange stated at Options 8,
Section 34(f)(6)(A) that ‘‘respecting FLEX index
options, the settlement value may be specified as
the index value reported at the: (i) close (P.M.settled); and (ii) opening (A.M.-settled) of trading
on the Exchange. American style index options
exercised prior to the expiration date can only settle
based on the closing value on the exercise date.
FLEX index options are settled in U.S. dollars.’’
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
proposes a technical amendment to
underline ‘‘Market Maker’’ in Options 8,
Section 34(g)(3). SR–Phlx–2023–22
inadvertently did not underline that
text, thereby designating it as new text.
Seventh, the Exchange proposes to
amend Position Limits in Options 8,
Section 34(i) to add a new paragraph
stating that,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
There shall be no position limits for FLEX
Equity Options, other than as set forth in this
paragraph and (4) below. Position limits for
FLEX Equity Options where the underlying
security is an ETF that is settled in cash
pursuant to subparagraph (f)(6)(A) shall be
subject to the position limits set forth in
Options 9, Section 13, and subject to the
exercise limits set forth in Options 9, Section
15. Positions in such cash-settled FLEX
Options shall be aggregated with positions in
physically-settled options on the same
underlying ETF for the purpose of calculating
the position limits set forth in Options 9,
Section 13, and the exercise limits set forth
in Options 9, Section 15.
The Exchange will describe position
limits for an ETF that is settled in cash
below with the description of its
proposal to permit a cash-settled ETF.
The Exchange proposes to remove
certain numbering as unnecessary in
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(2),
which is currently Options 8, Section
34(i)(1). The Exchange would create a
new Options 8, Section 34(i)(2) and title
it ‘‘Reports.’’ The Exchange would
remove ‘‘However’’ from this new
paragraph and start the paragraph with
‘‘Each.’’
The Exchange proposes to add the tile
‘‘Additional Margin Requirements’’ to
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(3).
The Exchange proposes to amend
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(3),
current Options 8, Section 34(i)(3), by
renumbering it to ‘‘(4)’’ and adding a
title ‘‘Aggregation of FLEX Positions.’’
Further, the Exchange proposes to note
that, ‘‘For purposes of the position
limits and reporting requirements set
forth in this Rule, FLEX Option
positions shall not be aggregated with
positions in non-FLEX Options other
than as noted in this subparagraphs
(i)(3) and (4), and positions in FLEX
Index Options on a given index shall
not be aggregated with options on any
stocks included in the index or with
FLEX Index Option positions on another
index.’’ 12 Pursuant to proposed Options
8, Section 34(i)(4)(a), commencing at the
close of trading two business days prior
to the last trading day of the calendar
quarter, positions in P.M.-settled FLEX
Index Options (i.e., FLEX Index Options
having an exercise settlement value
determined by the level of the index at
12 The Exchange also proposes to change ‘‘shall’’
to ‘‘will in two places in this paragraph.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
the close of trading on the last trading
day before expiration) shall be
aggregated with positions in Quarterly
Options Series on the same index with
the same expiration and shall be subject
to the position limits set forth in
Options 4A, Section 6.13 Pursuant to
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4)(b),
commencing at the close of trading two
business days prior to the last trading
day of the week, positions in FLEX
Index Options that are cash settled 14
shall be aggregated with positions in
Short Term Option Series on the same
underlying (e.g., same underlying index
as a FLEX Index Option) with the same
means for determining exercise
settlement value (e.g., opening or
closing prices of the underlying index)
and same expiration, and shall be
subject to the position limits set forth in
Options 4A, Section 6.15 Pursuant to
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4)(c),
as long as the options positions remain
open, positions in FLEX Options that
expire on a third Friday-of-the-month
expiration day shall be aggregated with
positions in non-FLEX Options on the
same underlying, and shall be subject to
the position limits set forth in Options
4A, Section 6, or Options 9, Section 13,
as applicable, and the exercise limits set
forth in Options 9, Section 15, as
applicable.16
Eighth, the Exchange proposes to
amend Exercise Limits in Options 8,
Section 34(j) to provide further detail
and rearrange the rule text. The
Exchange proposes to relocate the rule
text in Options 8, Section 34(j)(1) that
provides, ‘‘Positions in FLEX options
shall not be taken into account when
calculating exercise limits for non-FLEX
options, except as provided in
paragraph (d) above. The minimum
exercise size shall be the lesser of $1
million underlying equivalent value for
FLEX index options, and 25 contracts
for FLEX equity and currency options,
or the remaining size of the position.’’
Instead, the Exchange proposes to
provide at Options 8, Section 34(j)(1)(a)
that, ‘‘The minimum value size for
FLEX Equity Option exercises shall be
25 contracts or the remaining size of the
position, whichever is less.’’ Proposed
Options 8, Section 34(j)(1)(b) will
require that the minimum value size for
13 See Cboe Rule 8.35(d)(1) for materially
identical provisions.
14 The Exchange notes that all FLEX Index
Options will be cash settled. Cash-settled ETFs will
be described later in this proposal.
15 This is based on Cboe Rule 8.35(d)(2), except
the Exchange does not currently list Credit Default
Options and will therefore not incorporate the
applicable portion into its proposed rule.
16 See Cboe Rule 8.35(d)(3) for materially
identical provisions.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86009
FLEX Index Option exercises be $1
million Underlying Equivalent Value (as
defined below) or the remaining
Underlying Equivalent Value of the
position, whichever is less.17 Proposed
Options 8, Section 34(j)(1)(c) will
stipulate that except as provided in
proposed subparagraph (i) and (i)(4)
above,18 FLEX Options shall not be
taken into account when calculating
exercise limits for non-FLEX Option
contracts.19 Proposed Options 8, Section
34(j)(1)(d) will set forth the definition of
Underlying Equivalent Value as the
aggregate value of a FLEX Index Option
(index multiplier times the current
index value) multiplied by the number
of FLEX Index Options.20 Finally, the
Exchange proposes to add a sentence to
the end of Options 8, Section 34(j) that
provides, ‘‘There shall be no exercise
limits for broad-based FLEX Index
Options (including reduced value
option contracts) on the broad-based
index options listed in Options 4A,
Section 6(a).’’
Options 8, Section 33
The Exchange also proposes to make
a technical amendment to Options 8,
Section 33, Accommodation
Transactions, at paragraph (e) to remove
correct improperly placed
parentheticals from SR–Phlx–2024–22.
Cash-Settled Exchange Traded Funds
(‘‘ETFs’’)
Generally, FLEX Equity Options will
be settled by physical delivery of the
underlying security,21 while all FLEX
Index Options will be settled by
delivery in cash.22 The Exchange
proposes to allow FLEX Equity Options
where the underlying security is an ETF
to be settled by delivery in cash if the
underlying security meets prescribed
criteria. The Exchange notes that cashsettled FLEX ETF Options will be
subject to the same trading rules and
procedures described in Options 8,
Section 34 that will govern the trading
17 See Cboe Rule 8.42(g)(2) for materially identical
provisions.
18 As described above, proposed Options 8,
Section 34(i)(4) will govern the aggregation of FLEX
positions generally, while proposed Options 8,
Section 34(i)(1) will govern the aggregation of cashsettled FLEX Equity Options specifically and that
positions in such cash-settled FLEX Equity Options
will be aggregated with positions in physically
settled options on the same underlying ETF. Cashsettled FLEX Equity Options will be discussed later
in this filing.
19 See Cboe Rule 8.42(g)(3) for materially identical
provisions.
20 See Phlx Options 8, Section 34(b)(8)(D) for
materially identical provisions.
21 See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(1).
22 See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2).
As discussed below, cash settlement is also
permitted in the OTC market.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
86010
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
of other FLEX Options on the Exchange,
with the exception of the rules to
accommodate the cash-settlement
feature proposed as follows. Today,
NYSE American Rule 903G 23 and Cboe
Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A) 24 allow for cashsettled FLEX ETF Options as well.
To permit cash settlement of certain
FLEX ETF Options, the Exchange
proposes rule text in Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A)(2) to provide that the
exercise settlement for a FLEX ETF
Option may be by physical delivery of
the underlying ETF or by delivery in
cash if the underlying security,
measured over a defined six-month
period,25 has an average daily notional
value of $500 million or more and a
national average daily volume (‘‘ADV’’)
of at least 4,680,000 shares.26
The Exchange also proposes in
Options 8, Section 34(f) that a FLEX
Equity Option overlying an ETF (cashor physically-settled) may not be the
same type (put or call) and may not
have the same exercise style, expiration
date, and exercise price as a non-FLEX
Equity Option overlying the same
ETF.27 In other words, regardless of
whether a FLEX Equity Option
overlying an ETF is cash or physically
settled, at least one of the exercise style
(i.e., American-style or European-style),
expiration date, and exercise price of
that FLEX Option must differ from those
terms of a non-FLEX Option overlying
the same ETF in order to list such a
FLEX Equity Option. For example,
suppose a non-FLEX SPY option (which
is physically settled, p.m.-settled and
American-style) with a specific
September expiration and exercise price
of 475 is listed for trading. A FLEX
Trader could not submit an order to
trade a FLEX SPY option (which is p.m.settled) that is cash-settled (or
23 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88131
(February 5, 2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11, 2020)
(SR–NYSEAmer–2019–38) (Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified
by Amendment No. 1, To Allow Certain Flexible
Equity Options To Be Cash Settled).
24 Cboe also filed an immediately effective rule
change to allow certain FLEX Options to be cash
settled. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
98044 (August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August 8,
2023) (SR–Cboe–2023–036) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Allow Certain Flexible Exchange Equity Options
To Be Cash Settled).
25 As noted below, the Exchange plans to conduct
the bi-annual review on January 1 and July 1 of
each year. As such, the six-month periods will be
from January to June, and from July to December
each year.
26 See Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii) for materially
identical provisions.
27 See introductory paragraph of Cboe Rule
4.21(b) for materially identical provisions. All nonFLEX Equity Options (including on ETFs) are
physically settled. Note all FLEX and non-FLEX
Equity Options (including ETFs) are p.m.-settled.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
physically settled) and American-style
with the same September expiration and
exercise price of 475.
In addition, the Exchange proposes
new Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2)(a),
which would provide that the Exchange
will determine bi-annually the
underlying ETFs that satisfy the
notional value and trading volume
requirements in (f)(6)(A)(2) by using
trading statistics for the defined sixmonth period.28 The proposed rule
would further provide that the Exchange
will permit cash settlement as a contract
term on no more than 50 underlying
ETFs that meet the criteria in this
subparagraph (f)(6)(A)(2) and that if
more than 50 underlying ETFs satisfy
the notional value and trading volume
requirements, then the Exchange would
select the top 50 ETFs that have the
highest average daily volume.29
Proposed new Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A)(2)(b) would further provide
that if the Exchange determines
pursuant to the bi-annual review that an
underlying ETF ceases to satisfy the
requirements under proposed
(f)(6)(A)(2)(a), any new position
overlying such ETF entered into will be
required to have exercise settlement by
physical delivery, and any open cashsettled FLEX ETF Option positions may
be traded only to close the position.30
The Exchange believes it is
appropriate to introduce cash settlement
as an alternative contract term to the
select group of ETFs because they are
among the most highly liquid and
actively traded ETF securities. As
described more fully below, the
Exchange believes that the deep
liquidity and robust trading activity in
the ETFs identified by the Exchange as
meeting the criteria mitigate against
historic concerns regarding
susceptibility to manipulation.
28 See proposed Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A)(2)(b), which is based on Cboe Rule
4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii)(a). The Exchange plans to conduct
the bi-annual review on January 1 and July 1 of
each year. As such, the six-month periods will be
from January to June, and from July to December
each year. The results of the bi-annual review will
be announced via an Options Trader Alert and any
new securities that qualify would be permitted to
have cash settlement as a contract term beginning
on February 1 and August 1 of each year. If the
Exchange initially begins listing cash-settled FLEX
Equity Options on a different date (e.g., September
1), it would initially list securities that qualified as
of the last bi-annual review (e.g., the one conducted
on July 1).
29 See proposed Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A)(2)(a), which is based on Cboe Rule
4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii)(a).
30 See proposed Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A)(2)(b), which is based on Cboe Rule
4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii)(b). If a listing is closing only,
pursuant to Options 4, Section 4(a), opening
transactions by Market Makers executed to
accommodate closing transactions of other market
participants are permitted.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Characteristics of ETFs
ETFs are funds that have their value
derived from assets owned. The net
asset value (‘‘NAV’’) of an ETF is a daily
calculation that is based off the most
recent closing prices of the assets in the
fund and an actual accounting of the
total cash in the fund at the time of
calculation. The NAV of an ETF is
calculated by taking the sum of the
assets in the fund, including any
securities and cash, subtracting out any
liabilities, and dividing that by the
number of shares outstanding.
Additionally, each ETF is subject to a
creation and redemption mechanism to
ensure the price of the ETF does not
fluctuate too far away from its NAV—
which mechanisms reduce the potential
for manipulative activity. Each business
day, ETFs are required to make publicly
available a portfolio composition file
that describes the makeup of their
creation and redemption ‘‘baskets’’ (i.e.,
a specific list of names and quantities of
securities or other assets designed to
track the performance of the portfolio as
a whole). ETF shares are created when
an Authorized Participant,31 typically a
market maker or other large institutional
investor, deposits the daily creation
basket or cash with the ETF issuer. In
return for the creation basket or cash (or
both), the ETF issues to the Authorized
Participant a ‘‘creation unit’’ that
consists of a specified number of ETF
shares. For instance, IWM is designed to
track the performance of the Russell
2000 Index. An Authorized Participant
will purchase all the Russell 2000
constituent securities in the exact same
weight as the index prescribes, then
deliver those shares to the ETF issuer.
In exchange, the ETF issuer gives the
Authorized Participant a block of
equally valued ETF shares, on a one-forone fair value basis. This process can
also work in reverse. A redemption is
achieved when the Authorized
Participant accumulates a sufficient
number of shares of the ETF to
constitute a creation unit and then
exchanges these ETF shares with the
ETF issuer, thereby decreasing the
supply of ETF shares in the market.
The principal, and perhaps most
important, feature of ETFs is their
reliance on an ‘‘arbitrage function’’
performed by market participants that
influences the supply and demand of
ETF shares and, thus, trading prices
relative to NAV. As noted above, new
31 ‘‘Authorized Participant’’ means a member or
participant of a clearing agency registered with the
Commission, which has a written agreement with
the exchange-traded fund or one of its service
providers that allows the authorized participant to
place orders for the purchase and redemption of
creation units. See SEC Rule 6c–11(a)(1).
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
ETF shares can be created and existing
shares redeemed based on investor
demand; thus, ETF supply is openended. This arbitrage function helps to
keep an ETF’s price in line with the
value of its underlying portfolio, i.e., it
minimizes deviation from NAV.
Generally, in the Exchange’s view, the
higher the liquidity and trading volume
of an ETF, the more likely the price of
the ETF will not deviate from the value
of its underlying portfolio, making such
ETFs less susceptible to price
manipulation.
Trading Data for the ETFs Proposed for
Cash Settlement
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that average
daily notional value is an appropriate
proxy for selecting underlying securities
that are not readily susceptible to
manipulation for purposes of
establishing a settlement price. Average
daily notional value considers both the
trading activity and the price of an
underlying security. As a general matter,
the more expensive an underlying
security’s price, the less cost-effective
manipulation could become. Further,
manipulation of the price of a security
encounters greater difficulty the more
volume that is traded. To calculate
average daily notional value (provided
in the table below), the Exchange
summed the notional value of each
trade for each symbol (i.e., the number
of shares times the price for each
execution in the security) and divided
that total by the number of trading days
in the six-month period (from January 1,
2024 through June 30, 2024) reviewed
by the Exchange.
Further, the Exchange proposes that
qualifying ETFs also meet an ADV
standard. The purpose for this second
criteria is to prevent unusually
expensive underlying securities from
qualifying under the average daily
notional value standard while not being
one of the most actively traded
securities. The Exchange believes an
ADV requirement of 4,680,000 shares a
day is appropriate because it represents
average trading in the underlying ETF of
200 shares per second. While no
security is immune from all
manipulation, the Exchange believes
that the combination of average daily
notional value and ADV as prerequisite
requirements would limit cash
settlement of FLEX ETF Options to
those underlying ETFs that would be
less susceptible to manipulation in
order to establish a settlement price.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed objective criteria would
ensure that only the most robustly
traded and deeply liquid ETFs would
qualify to have cash settlement as a
contract term. As provided in the below
table, from January 1, 2024 to June 30,
2024, the Exchange would be able to
provide cash settlement as a contract
term for FLEX ETF Options on 48
underlying ETFs, as only this group of
securities would currently meet the
requirement of $500 million or more
average daily notional value and a
minimum ADV of 4,680,000 shares. The
table below provides the list of the 48
ETFs that, for the period covering
January 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024,
would be eligible to have cash
settlement as a contract term.32
Average daily
notional value
(in dollars)
(1/1/24–6/30/24)
Symbol
Security name
AGG ..................
ARKK ................
BIL ....................
BND ..................
EEM ..................
EFA ...................
EMB ..................
EWJ ..................
EWZ ..................
FXI ....................
GBTC ................
GDX ..................
GLD ..................
HYG ..................
IBIT ...................
IEF ....................
IEFA ..................
IEMG .................
IVV ....................
IWM ..................
IYR ....................
KRE ..................
KWEB ...............
LQD ..................
NVDL ................
QQQ .................
RSP ..................
SLV ...................
SMH ..................
SOXL ................
SOXS ................
SPXL .................
SPY ...................
SQQQ ...............
TLT ...................
TNA ...................
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF .................................................................
ARK Innovation ETF .................................................................................................
SPDR Bloomberg 1–3 Month T-Bill ETF .................................................................
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF ........................................................
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF .....................................................................
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF .........................................................................................
iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF ...........................................
iShares MSCI Japan ETF ........................................................................................
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF .........................................................................................
iShares China Large-Cap ETF .................................................................................
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust * ..........................................................................................
VanEck Gold Miners ETF .........................................................................................
SPDR Gold Shares ..................................................................................................
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF ....................................................
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF * ......................................................................................
iShares 7–10 Year Treasury Bond ETF ...................................................................
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF ................................................................................
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF ............................................................
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF .....................................................................................
iShares Russell 2000 ETF .......................................................................................
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF .................................................................................
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF ..........................................................................
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF ......................................................................
Shares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF ........................................
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF ................................................................
Invesco QQQ Trust ..................................................................................................
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF .......................................................................
iShares Silver Trust ..................................................................................................
VanEck Semiconductor ETF ....................................................................................
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3x Shares .........................................................
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares ........................................................
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares ..................................................................
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust .......................................................................................
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF .......................................................................
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF .....................................................................
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares ................................................................
$806,096,032
588,267,283
618,700,170
514,223,054
1,164,586,979
1,104,421,854
542,748,575
509,554,399
683,919,536
1,027,752,868
683,447,931
774,584,258
1,511,241,142
2,850,542,598
1,338,731,551
743,974,086
577,266,076
519,063,454
2,774,452,994
6,731,230,018
537,339,035
676,589,675
555,987,739
3,007,311,016
682,096,758
17,916,413,637
982,482,303
602,178,901
1,783,514,710
2,703,451,838
695,294,352
737,685,244
33,559,628,313
1,461,906,416
3,779,166,025
697,479,128
32 As noted below, options on GBTC and IBIT are
not yet available.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86011
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Average daily
volume
(in shares)
(1/1/24–6/30/24)
8,295,918
12,516,087
6,753,925
7,130,093
28,535,696
14,216,699
6,149,042
7,481,823
21,690,846
42,009,611
13,105,251
24,682,952
7,344,884
37,011,783
35,140,151
7,917,457
7,997,376
10,129,994
5,417,239
33,649,687
6,177,644
13,902,921
20,766,407
27,902,549
11,387,201
41,065,771
6,062,567
24,515,577
8,199,564
64,700,251
92,188,004
6,096,062
66,151,690
131,905,524
40,682,936
18,832,200
86012
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
Average daily
notional value
(in dollars)
(1/1/24–6/30/24)
Symbol
Security name
TQQQ ...............
VCIT ..................
VEA ...................
VOO ..................
XBI ....................
XLE ...................
XLF ...................
XLI ....................
XLK ...................
XLP ...................
XLU ...................
XLV ...................
ProShares UltraPro QQQ .........................................................................................
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corp Bond Idx Fund ETF .........................................
Vanguard Tax Managed Fund FTSE Developed Markets ETF ...............................
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF ...........................................................................................
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF ..........................................................................................
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund ...........................................................................
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund ........................................................................
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund ........................................................................
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund ....................................................................
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund .........................................................
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund ...........................................................................
Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund ...................................................................
3,796,209,774
597,752,071
517,396,977
2,425,398,743
979,943,806
1,411,567,713
1,736,012,363
1,114,661,946
1,274,025,061
907,491,273
944,774,031
1,127,277,467
Average daily
volume
(in shares)
(1/1/24–6/30/24)
64,941,840
7,484,828
10,583,858
5,177,005
10,728,380
15,798,449
43,157,138
9,277,779
6,202,031
12,108,426
14,540,920
7,876,680
* Options on this ETF are not yet available.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that permitting
cash settlement as a contract term for
FLEX ETF Options for the ETFs in the
above table would broaden the base of
investors that use FLEX Equity Options
to manage their trading and investment
risk, including investors that currently
trade in the OTC market for customized
options, where settlement restrictions
do not apply.
The Exchange notes that the SEC has
previously approved a rule filing of
another exchange that allowed for the
trading of cash-settled options 33 and,
specifically, cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options (which the Exchange proposes
to list in the same manner as that
exchange).34
33 See, e.g., PHLX FX Options traded on Nasdaq
PHLX and S&P 500® Index Options traded on Cboe
Options Exchange. The Commission approved, on
a pilot basis, the listing and trading of RealDayTM
Options on the SPDR S&P 500 Trust on the BOX
Options Exchange LLC (‘‘BOX’’). See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 79936 (February 2, 2017),
82 FR 9886 (February 8, 2017) (‘‘RealDay Pilot
Program’’). The RealDay Pilot Program was
extended until February 2, 2019. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 82414 (December 28,
2017), 83 FR 577 (January 4, 2018) (SR–BOX–2017–
38). The RealDay Pilot Program was never
implemented by BOX. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 56251 (August 14, 2007), 72 FR
46523 (August 20, 2007) (SR–Amex–2004–27)
(Order approving listing of cash-settled Fixed
Return Options (‘‘FROs’’)); and 71957 (April 16,
2014), 79 FR 22563 (April 22, 2014) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–06) (Order approving name
change from FROs to ByRDs and re-launch of these
products, with certain modifications.
34 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
88131 (February 5, 2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11,
2020) (SR–NYSEAMER–2019–38) (Order Approving
a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, to Allow Certain Flexible Equity
Options To Be Cash Settled); 97231 (March 31,
2023), 88 FR 20587 (April 6, 2023) (SR–
NYSEAMER–2023–22) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change to
Make a Clarifying Change to the Term Settlement
Style Applicable to Flexible Exchange Options);
and 98044 (August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August
8, 2023) (SR–Cboe–2023–036) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Allow Certain Flexible Exchange Equity Options
To Be Cash Settled.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
Today, equity options are settled
physically at The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’), i.e., upon
exercise, shares of the underlying
security must be assumed or delivered.
Physical settlement may possess certain
risks with respect to volatility and
movement of the underlying security at
expiration against which market
participants may need to hedge. The
Exchange believes cash settlement may
be preferable to physical delivery in
some circumstances as it does not
present the same risk. If an issue with
the delivery of the underlying security
arises, it may become more expensive
(and time consuming) to reverse the
delivery because the price of the
underlying security would almost
certainly have changed. Reversing a
cash payment, on the other hand, would
not involve any such issue because
reversing a cash delivery would simply
involve the exchange of cash.
Additionally, with physical settlement,
market participants that have a need to
generate cash would have to sell the
underlying security while incurring the
costs associated with liquidating their
position as well as the risk of an adverse
movement in the price of the underlying
security.
With respect to position and exercise
limits, cash-settled FLEX ETF Options
would be subject to the position limits
set forth in proposed Options 8, Section
34(i). Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to add Options 8, Section
34(i)(1), which would provide that a
position in FLEX Equity Options where
the underlying security is an ETF that
is settled in cash pursuant to Options 8,
Section 34(f)(6)(A) shall be subject to
the position limits set forth in Options
9, Section 13, and subject to the exercise
limits set forth in Options 9, Section
15.35 The proposed rule would further
35 The Exchange proposes to add to proposed
Options 8, Section 34(i)(1) a cross reference to
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
state that positions in such cash-settled
FLEX Equity Options shall be
aggregated with positions in physically
settled options on the same underlying
ETF for the purpose of calculating the
position limits set forth in Options 9,
Section 13 and the exercise limits set
forth in Options 9, Section 15.36 The
Exchange further proposes to add in
Options 8, Section 34(i)(1) a crossreference to subparagraph (f)(6)(A), as
subparagraph (i)(1) would also contain
provisions about position limits for
FLEX Equity Options that would be
exceptions to the first sentence in this
paragraph stating that FLEX Equity
Options have no position limits. The
Exchange also proposes to add in
paragraph (i)(4), a cross-reference to
proposed subparagraphs (i)(1) as the
proposed rule adds language regarding
aggregation of positions for purposes of
position limits, which will be covered
by paragraph (i)(4). Given that each of
the underlying ETFs that would
currently be eligible to have cashsettlement as a contract term have
established position and exercise limits
applicable to physically settled options,
the Exchange believes it is appropriate
for the same position and exercise limits
to also apply to cash-settled options.
Accordingly, of the 48 underlying
securities that would currently be
proposed subparagraph (f)(6)(A), as proposed
Section 34(i)(1) also contains provisions about
position limits for FLEX Equity Options that would
be exceptions to the statement in proposed Section
(i)(1) that FLEX Equity Options have no position
limits (in addition to the language in proposed
34(i)(1)). The Exchange also proposes to add to
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4) a crossreference to proposed subparagraph subparagraph
(i)(1), as the proposed rule adds language regarding
aggregation of positions for purposes of position
limits, which will be covered in proposed Section
34(i)(4).
36 See proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(1), which
is based on Cboe Rule 8.35(c)(1)(B). The aggregation
of position and exercise limits would include all
positions on physically settled FLEX and non-FLEX
Options on the same underlying ETFs.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
eligible to have cash settlement as a
FLEX contract term, 33 would have a
position limit of 250,000 contracts
pursuant to Options 9, Section
13(d)(5).37 Further, pursuant to
Supplementary Material .01 to Options
9, Section 13, seven would have a
position limit of 500,000 contracts (EWJ,
EWZ, TLT, HYG, XLF, LQD, and GDX);
four (EEM, FXI, IWM, and EFA) would
have a position limit of 1,000,000
contracts; one (QQQ) would have a
position limit of 1,800,000 contracts;
and one (SPY) would have a position
limit of 3,600,000.38
The Exchange understands that cashsettled ETF options are currently traded
in the OTC market by a variety of
market participants, e.g., hedge funds,
proprietary trading firms, and pension
funds.39 These options are not fungible
with the exchange listed options. The
Exchange believes some of these market
participants would prefer to trade
comparable instruments on an
exchange, where they would be cleared
and settled through a regulated clearing
agency. The Exchange expects that users
of these OTC products would be among
the primary users of exchange-traded
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options. The
Exchange also believes that the trading
of cash-settled FLEX ETF Options
would allow these same market
participants to better manage the risk
associated with the volatility of
underlying equity positions given the
enhanced liquidity that an exchangetraded product would bring.
In the Exchange’s view, cash-settled
FLEX ETF Options traded on the
37 Options 9, Section 13(d)(5) provides that to be
eligible for the 250,000 contract limit, either the
most recent six (6) month trading volume of the
underlying security must have totalled at least 100
million shares or the most recent six-month trading
volume of the underlying security must have
totalled at least seventy-five (75) million shares and
the underlying security must have at least 300
million shares currently outstanding. Further as
noted above, options on GBTC and IBIT are not yet
available.
38 These were based on position limits as of
September 13, 2024. Position limits are available on
at https://www.theocc.com. Position limits for ETFs
are always determined in accordance with the
Exchange’s Rules regarding position limits.
39 As noted above, other options exchanges have
received approval to list certain cash-settled FLEX
ETF Options. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 88131 (February 5, 2020), 85 FR 7806 (February
11, 2020) (SR–NYSEAmer–2019–38) (Notice of
Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Allow
Certain Flexible Equity Options To Be Cash
Settled). Cboe also filed an immediately effective
rule change to allow certain FLEX Options to be
cash settled. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 98044 (August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August
8, 2023) (SR–Cboe–2023–036) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Allow Certain Flexible Exchange Equity Options
To Be Cash Settled).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
Exchange would have three important
advantages over the contracts that are
traded in the OTC market. First, as a
result of greater standardization of
contract terms, exchange-traded
contracts should develop more
liquidity. Second, counter-party credit
risk would be mitigated by the fact that
the contracts are issued and guaranteed
by OCC. Finally, the price discovery and
dissemination provided by the
Exchange and its members would lead
to more transparent markets. The
Exchange believes that its ability to offer
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would
aid it in competing with the OTC market
and at the same time expand the
universe of products available to
interested market participants. The
Exchange believes that an exchangetraded alternative may provide a useful
risk management and trading vehicle for
market participants and their customers.
Further, the Exchange believes listing
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would
provide investors with competition on
an exchange platform, as other options
exchanges have received Commission
approval to list the same options.40
The Exchange notes that OCC has
received approval from the Commission
for rule changes that will accommodate
the clearance and settlement of cashsettled ETF options.41 The Exchange has
also analyzed its capacity and
represents that it and The Options Price
Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) have the
necessary systems capacity to handle
the additional traffic associated with the
listing of cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options. The Exchange believes any
additional traffic that would be
generated from the introduction of cashsettled FLEX ETF Options would be
manageable. The Exchange expects that
members will not have a capacity issue
as a result of this proposed rule change.
The Exchange also does not believe this
proposed rule change will cause
fragmentation of liquidity. The
Exchange will monitor the trading
volume associated with the additional
options series listed as a result of this
proposed rule change and the effect (if
any) of these additional series on market
fragmentation and on the capacity of the
Exchange’s automated systems.
The Exchange does not believe that
allowing cash settlement as a contract
term would render the marketplace for
equity options more susceptible to
manipulative practices. The Exchange
believes that manipulating the
settlement price of cash-settled FLEX
40 See
supra note 39.
41 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
94910 (May 13, 2022), 87 FR 30531 (May 19, 2022)
(SR–OCC–2022–003).
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86013
ETF Options would be difficult based
on the size of the market for the
underlying ETFs that are the subject of
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange notes that each underlying
ETF in the table above is sufficiently
active to alleviate concerns about
potential manipulative activity. Further,
in the Exchange’s view, the vast
liquidity in the 48 underlying ETFs that
would currently be eligible to be traded
as cash-settled FLEX options under the
proposal ensures a multitude of market
participants at any given time.
Moreover, given the high level of
participation among market participants
that enter quotes and/or orders in
physically settled options on these
ETFs, the Exchange believes it would be
very difficult for a single participant to
alter the price of the underlying ETF or
options overlying such ETF in any
significant way without exposing the
would-be manipulator to regulatory
scrutiny. The Exchange further believes
any attempt to manipulate the price of
the underlying ETF or options overlying
such ETF would also be cost
prohibitive. As a result, the Exchange
believes there is significant
participation among market participants
to prevent manipulation of cash-settled
FLEX ETF Options.
Still, the Exchange believes it has an
adequate surveillance program in place
and intends to apply the same program
procedures to cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options that it applies to the Exchange’s
other options products.42 FLEX options
products and their respective symbols
will be integrated into the Exchange’s
existing surveillance system
architecture and will thus be subject to
the relevant surveillance processes, as
applicable. The Exchange believes that
the existing surveillance procedures at
the Exchange are capable of properly
identifying unusual and/or illegal
trading activity, which procedures the
Exchange would utilize to surveil for
aberrant trading in cash-settled FLEX
ETF Options.
With respect to regulatory scrutiny,
the Exchange believes its existing
surveillance technologies and
procedures adequately address potential
concerns regarding possible
manipulation of the settlement value at
or near the close of the market. The
Exchange notes that the regulatory
program operated by and overseen by
42 For example, the regulatory program for the
Exchange includes surveillance designed to identify
manipulative and other improper options trading,
including, spoofing, marking the close, front
running, wash sales, etc.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
86014
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Phlx 43 includes cross-market
surveillance designed to identify
manipulative and other improper
trading, including spoofing, algorithm
gaming, marking the close and open, as
well as more general, abusive behavior
related to front running, wash sales, and
quoting/routing, which may occur on
the Exchange or other markets.44 These
cross-market patterns incorporate
relevant data from various markets
beyond the Exchange and its affiliates
and from markets not affiliated with the
Exchange. The Exchange represents
that, today, its existing trading
surveillances are adequate to monitor
trading in the underlying ETFs and
subsequent trading of options on those
securities listed on the Exchange.
Further, with the introduction of cashsettled FLEX ETF Options, the Exchange
would leverage its existing surveillances
to monitor trading in the underlying
ETFs and subsequent trading of options
on those securities listed on the
Exchange with respect to cash-settled
FLEX ETF options.45
Additionally, for options, the
Exchange utilizes an array of patterns
that monitor manipulation of options, or
manipulation of equity securities
(regardless of venue) for the purpose of
impacting options prices on the
Exchange (i.e., mini-manipulation
strategies). That surveillance coverage is
initiated once options begin trading on
the Exchange. Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that the cross-market
surveillance performed by the Exchange
or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange,
coupled with Phlx’s own monitoring for
violative activity on the Exchange
comprise a comprehensive surveillance
program that is adequate to monitor for
manipulation of the underlying ETF and
overlying option. Furthermore, the
Exchange believes that the existing
43 Phlx maintains a regulatory services agreement
with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) whereby FINRA provides certain
regulatory services to the exchanges, including
cross-market surveillance, investigation, and
enforcement services.
44 As it relates to Reg SHO violations, the
Exchange will enforce this through its Stock-Tied
Reg SHO price protections in Options 3, Section
16(b). See supra note 65 for Stock-Tied Reg SHO
discussion. NES will only execute the underlying
covered security component of a Complex Order if
the underlying covered security component is in
accordance with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO.
Additionally, FINRA’s regulatory program
addresses Reg SHO compliance for its member
firms (which includes Exchange Members).
45 Such surveillance procedures generally focus
on detecting securities trading subject to opening
price manipulation, closing price manipulation,
layering, spoofing or other unlawful activity
impacting an underlying security, the option, or
both. The Exchange has price movement alerts,
unusual market activity and order book alerts active
for all trading symbols.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
surveillance procedures at the Exchange
are capable of properly identifying
unusual and/or illegal trading activity,
which the Exchange would utilize to
surveil for aberrant trading in cashsettled FLEX ETF Options.
In addition to the surveillance
procedures and processes described
above, improvements in audit trails (i.e.,
the Consolidated Audit Trail),
recordkeeping practices, and interexchange cooperation over the last two
decades have greatly increased the
Exchange’s ability to detect and punish
attempted manipulative activities. In
addition, the Exchange is a member of
the Intermarket Surveillance Group
(‘‘ISG’’). The ISG members work
together to coordinate surveillance and
investigative information sharing in the
stock and options markets. For
surveillance purposes, the Exchange
would therefore have access to
information regarding trading activity in
the pertinent underlying securities.
The proposed rule change is designed
to allow investors seeking to effect cashsettled FLEX ETF Options with the
opportunity for a different method of
settling option contracts at expiration if
they choose to do so. As noted above,
market participants may choose cash
settlement because physical settlement
possesses certain risks with respect to
volatility and movement of the
underlying security at expiration that
market participants may need to hedge
against. The Exchange believes that
offering innovative products flows to
the benefit of the investing public. A
robust and competitive market requires
that exchanges respond to members’
evolving needs by constantly improving
their offerings. Such efforts would be
stymied if exchanges were prohibited
from offering innovative products for
reasons that are generally debated in
academic literature. The Exchange
believes that introducing cash-settled
FLEX ETF Options would further
broaden the base of investors that use
FLEX Equity Options to manage their
trading and investment risk, including
investors that currently trade in the OTC
market for customized options, where
settlement restrictions do not apply. The
proposed rule change is also designed to
encourage market makers to shift
liquidity from the OTC market onto the
Exchange, which, it believes, would
enhance the process of price discovery
conducted on the Exchange through
increased order flow. The Exchange also
believes that this may open up cashsettled FLEX ETF Options to more retail
investors. The Exchange does not
believe that this proposed rule change
raises any unique regulatory concerns
because existing safeguards—such as
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
position limits (and the aggregation of
cash-settled positions with physicallysettled positions), exercise limits (and
the aggregation of cash-settled positions
with physically-settled positions), and
reporting requirements—would
continue to apply. The Exchange
believes the proposed position and
exercise limits may further help mitigate
the concerns that the limits are designed
to address about the potential for
manipulation and market disruption in
the options and the underlying
securities.46
Given the novel characteristics of
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options, the
Exchange will conduct a review of the
trading in cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options over an initial five-year period.
The Exchange will furnish five reports
to the Commission based on this review,
the first of which would be provided
within 60 days after the first anniversary
of the initial listing date of the first
cash-settled FLEX ETF Option under the
proposed rule and each subsequent
annual report to be provided within 60
days after the second, third, fourth and
fifth anniversary of such initial listing.
At a minimum, each report will provide
a comparison between the trading
volume of all cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options listed under the proposed rule
and physically settled options on the
same underlying security, the liquidity
of the market for such options products
and the underlying ETF, and any
manipulation concerns arising in
connection with the trading of cashsettled FLEX ETF Options under the
proposed rule. The Exchange will also
provide additional data as requested by
the Commission during this five year
period. The reports will also discuss any
recommendations the Exchange may
have for enhancements to the listing
standards based on its review. The
Exchange believes these reports will
allow the Commission and the Exchange
to evaluate, among other things, the
impact such options have, and any
potential adverse effects, on price
volatility and the market for the
underlying ETFs, the component
securities underlying the ETFs, and the
options on the same underlying ETFs
and make appropriate
recommendations, if any, in response to
the reports.
Implementation
The Exchange proposes to implement
this rule change on or before December
23, 2024. The Exchange will announce
46 See proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(1), which
is based on Cboe Rule 8.35(c)(1)(B). The aggregation
of position and exercise limits would include all
positions on physically settled FLEX and non-FLEX
Options on the same underlying ETFs.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
an implementation date by issuing an
Options Trader Alert.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,47 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.48
Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 49 requirements that
the rules of an exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Permissible Series
The Exchange’s proposal to not
authorize for trading a FLEX Option on
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (‘‘IBIT’’) is
consistent with ISE’s Approval Order of
iShares Bitcoin Trust.50 ISE stated that
the position limit for IBIT options shall
be 25,000 contracts.51 Phlx proposes to
exclude IBIT Options from trading as a
FLEX Options to continue to limit the
position limits for IBIT Options.
Characteristics of ETFs
The Exchange’s proposal to provide in
Options 8, Section 34(f)(1)(B) that, ‘‘an
underlying equity security or index, as
applicable (the index multiplier for
FLEX Index Options is 100)’’ is
consistent with the Act and will protect
investors and the general public because
this rule text adds transparency to the
current characteristics of underlying
interest for FLEX Option.
Minimum Trading Increments
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
Options 8, Section 34(f)(3) to provide
that, ‘‘The Exchange may determine the
smallest increment for exercise prices of
FLEX Options on a class-by-class basis
without going lower than the $0.01.’’ is
consistent with the Act and will protect
investors and the general public because
47 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
49 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
50 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
101128 (September 20, 2024), 89 FR 78942
(September 26, 2024) (SR–ISE–2024–03) (Notice of
Filing of Amendment Nos. 4 and 5 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1, 4, and
5, To Permit the Listing and Trading of Options on
the iShares Bitcoin Trust).
51 Id.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
this rule text provides clear, transparent
language regarding the minimum
trading increments for FLEX Options.
The language is consistent with Cboe
Rule 5.3(e)(3) except the Exchange is not
proposing to provide for Micro FLEX
Index Options or to allow prices to be
expressed as a percentage value because
the Exchange does not offer these
features today.
FLEX PM Third Friday Options
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
Options 8, Section 34(f)(5) to allow the
listing of FLEX PM Third Friday
Options, is consistent with the
Commission’s recent approval of Cboe’s
proposal to make its pilot a permanent
program.52 The Exchange believes that
aligning to Cboe will allow Phlx to
compete effectively with Cboe’s product
offering. Like Cboe, the Exchange
believes that FLEX PM Third Friday
Options will provide investors with
greater trading opportunities and
flexibility. The Exchange notes that the
Commission recently approved
proposals to make other pilots
permitting p.m.-settlement of index
options permanent after finding those
pilots were consistent with the Act and
the options subject to those pilots had
no significant impact on the market.53
The Exchange further believes that
permitting Phlx to list FLEX PM Third
Friday Options, similar to Cboe, will
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and
52 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222
(December 21, 2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28,
2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–018) (‘‘FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval’’). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review
of pilot data during the course of the pilot program
and a study by the Commission’s Division of
Economic and Risk Analysis (‘‘DERA’’) staff. See
FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
53 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
98454 (September 20, 2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–005)
(order approving proposed rule change to make
permanent the operation of a program that allows
the Exchange to list p.m.-settled third Friday-of-themonth SPX options series) (‘‘SPXPM Approval’’);
98455 (September 20, 2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–019)
(order approving proposed rule change to make
permanent the operation of a program that allows
the Exchange to list p.m.-settled third Friday-of-themonth XSP and MRUT options series) (‘‘XSP and
MRUT Approval’’); and 98456 (September 20, 2023)
(SR–CBOE–2023–020) (order approving proposed
rule change to make the nonstandard expirations
pilot program permanent) (‘‘Nonstandard
Approval’’). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 98451 (September 20, 2023), 88 FR
66088 (September 26, 2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–07)
(Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To
Make Permanent Certain P.M.-Settled Pilots); and
98950 (November 15, 2023), 88 FR 81172
(November 21, 2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–45) (Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Permit the
Listing and Trading of P.M.-Settled Nasdaq-100
Index Options With a Third-Friday-of-the-Month
Expiration).
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86015
protect investors, while maintaining a
fair and orderly market. As described in
the FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval,
Cboe observed no significant adverse
market impact or identified any
meaningful regulatory concerns during
the nearly 14-year operation of the FLEX
PM Third Friday Program as a pilot nor
during the 15 years since P.M.-settled
index options (SPX) were reintroduced
to the marketplace.54
As discussed in the FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval, the DERA staff study
and corresponding Cboe study
concluded that a significantly larger
amount of non-FLEX p.m.-settled index
options had no significant adverse
market impact and caused no
meaningful regulatory concerns.
Therefore, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable to conclude that the
relatively small amount of FLEX Index
Option volume would similarly have no
significant adverse market impact or
cause no meaningful regulatory
concerns.55
The Exchange also believes the
introduction of FLEX PM options had
54 Notably, Cboe did not identify any significant
economic impact (including on pricing or volatility
or in connection with reversals) on related futures,
the underlying indexes, or the underlying
component securities of the underlying indexes
surrounding the close as a result of the quantity of
FLEX PM Third Friday Options or the amount of
expiring open interest in FLEX PM Third Friday
Options, nor any demonstrated capacity for options
hedging activity to impact volatility in the
underlying markets. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 99222 (December 21, 2023), 88 FR
89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–018)
(‘‘FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval’’). In support of
making the pilot a permanent program, Cboe cited
to its own review of pilot data during the course
of the pilot program and a study by the
Commission’s Division of Economic and Risk
Analysis (‘‘DERA’’) staff. See FLEX Settlement Pilot
Approval, notes 18 and 35.
55 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222
(December 21, 2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28,
2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–018) (‘‘FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval’’). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review
of pilot data during the course of the pilot program
and a study by the Commission’s Division of
Economic and Risk Analysis (‘‘DERA’’) staff. See
FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
Additionally, these studies measured any impact on
related futures, the underlying indexes, or the
underlying component securities of the underlying
indexes surrounding the close. Despite FLEX SPX
options (which represent approximately half of the
year-to-date 2023 volume of FLEX Index Options
but only approximately 0.3% of total SPX volume)
not being included in the DERA staff study and
corresponding Cboe study, those studies concluded
that during the time periods covered (which
included the period of time in which the Pilot
Program has been operating), there was no
significant economic impact on the underlying
index or related products. Therefore, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to conclude that any FLEX
SPX Options that executed during the timeframes
covered by the studies had no significant impact on
the underlying index or related products, as neither
DERA staff nor Cboe observed any significant
economic impact on the underlying index or related
product.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
86016
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
no significant impact on the market
quality of corresponding a.m.-settled
options or other options. As discussed
in the FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval,
Cboe’s analysis conducted after the
introduction of SPXW options with
Tuesday and Thursday expirations
demonstrated no statistically significant
impact on the bid-ask or effective
spreads of SPXW options with Monday,
Wednesday, and Friday expirations after
trading in the SPXW options with
Tuesday and Thursday expirations
began.56 Further, Cboe concluded that
large FLEX PM Third Friday Options
trades had no material negative impact
(and likely no impact) on quote quality
of non-FLEX a.m.-settled options
overlying the same index with similar
terms as the FLEX PM Third Friday
Option upon evaluating data that
showed that the spreads were relatively
stable before and after large trades.57
Therefore, the Exchange believes Cboe’s
evaluation effectively demonstrates it is
likely that FLEX PM Third Friday
Options have had no significant
negative impact on the market quality of
non-FLEX Options with a.m.settlement.58
Additionally, the significant changes
in the closing procedures of the primary
markets in recent decades, including
considerable advances in trading
systems and technology, has
significantly minimized risks of any
potential impact of FLEX PM Third
Friday Options on the underlying cash
markets. As such, the Exchange believes
56 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222
(December 21, 2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28,
2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–018) (‘‘FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval’’). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review
of pilot data during the course of the pilot program
and a study by the Commission’s Division of
Economic and Risk Analysis (‘‘DERA’’) staff. See
FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
57 Specifically, Cboe evaluated each FLEX PM
Third Friday Options trade for more than 500
contracts that occurred on Cboe during a two-year
timeframe and analyzed the market quality
(specifically, the average time-weighted quote
spread and size 30 minutes prior to the trade and
the average time-weighted quote spread and size 30
minutes after the trade) of series non-FLEX a.m.settled options overlying the same index with
similar terms as the FLEX PM Third Friday Option
that traded (time to expiration, type (call or put),
and strike price) as set forth in the Cboe’s data. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222
(December 21, 2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28,
2023) (SR–CBOE–2023–018) (‘‘FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval’’). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review
of pilot data during the course of the pilot program
and a study by the Commission’s Division of
Economic and Risk Analysis (‘‘DERA’’) staff. See
FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
58 The Exchange acknowledges that, while FLEX
PM Third Friday Options has historically
represented a very small percentage of overall
volume, it is possible trading in these options may
grow in the future.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
that this proposal does not raise any
unique or prohibitive regulatory
concerns and that such trading has not,
and will not, adversely impact fair and
orderly markets on expiration Fridays
for the underlying indexes or their
component securities.
FLEX Options Terms
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A) to note
how the exercise value is determined
depending on whether it is a.m.-settled
or p.m.-settled is consistent with the Act
and will protect investors and the
general public because this rule text
adds transparency to the current
settlement of FLEX Index Options.
Position and Exercise Limits
Position and exercise limits are
designed to address potential
manipulative schemes and adverse
market impacts surrounding the use of
options, such as disrupting the market
in the security underlying the options.
While position and exercise limits
should address and discourage the
potential for manipulative schemes and
adverse market impact, if such limits are
set too low, participation in the options
market may be discouraged. The
Exchange believes that any decision
regarding imposing position and
exercise limits for FLEX Options must
therefore be balanced between
mitigating concerns of any potential
manipulation and the cost of inhibiting
potential hedging activity that could be
used for legitimate economic purposes.
As it relates to FLEX Index Options,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
amendments to position and exercise
limits in Options 8, Section 34(i) and (j)
are reasonably designed to prevent a
member organization from using FLEX
Index Options to evade the position
limits applicable to comparable nonFLEX Index Options. Further, by
establishing the proposed position and
exercise limits for FLEX Index Options
and, importantly, aggregating such
positions in the manner described in
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4) the
Exchange believes that the position and
exercise limit requirements for FLEX
Index Options should help to ensure
that the trading of FLEX Index Options
would not increase the potential for
manipulation or market disruption and
could help to minimize such incentives.
The Exchange also notes that proposed
position and exercise limits are
consistent with the rules of other
options exchanges that offer FLEX Index
Options, as well as the rules of its own
standard non-FLEX index options
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
market, and therefore raise no novel
issues for the Commission.59
As it relates to FLEX Equity Options,
while no position limits are proposed
for FLEX Equity Options, there are
several mitigating factors, which
include aggregation of FLEX Equity
Option and non-FLEX Equity Option
positions that expire on a third Fridayof-the-month and subjecting those
positions to position and exercise limits,
and daily monitoring of market activity.
Similar to the other exchanges that trade
FLEX Equity Options, the Exchange
believes that eliminating position and
exercise limits for FLEX Equity Options,
while requiring positions in FLEX
Equity Options that expire on a third
Friday-of-the-month to be aggregated
with positions in non-FLEX Equity
Options on the same underlying
security,60 removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system because it allows the Exchange
to create a product and market that is an
improved but comparable alternative to
the OTC market in customized options.
OTC transactions occur through
bilateral agreements, the terms of which
are not publicly disclosed to the
marketplace. As such, OTC transactions
do not contribute to the price discovery
process that exists on a public exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed elimination of position and
exercise limits for FLEX Equity Options
may encourage market participants to
transfer their liquidity demands from
OTC markets to exchanges and enable
liquidity providers to provide additional
liquidity to Phlx through transactions in
FLEX Equity Options. The Exchange
notes that the Commission previously
approved the elimination of position
and exercise limits for FLEX Equity
Options, finding that such elimination
would allow exchanges ‘‘to better
compete with the growing OTC market
in customized equity options, thereby
encouraging fair competition among
brokers and dealers and exchange
markets.’’ 61 The Commission has also
stated that the elimination of position
and exercise limits for FLEX Equity
59 See Cboe Rules 8.35(a), (b), (d), and 8.42(g) and
Phlx Options 4A, Sections 6(a), 9(a)(13), and
9(a)(14).
60 See proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4)(c) and
Section 34(j)(1)(c). See also Cboe Rules 8.35(d)(3)
and 8.42(g)(3); NYSE Arca Rules 5.35–O(a)(iii), (b)
and 5.36–O; NYSE American Rules 906G and 907G;
and Phlx Options 8, Section 34(e) and (f).
61 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42223
(December 10, 1999), 64 FR 71158, 71159
(December 20, 1999) (SR–Amex–99–40) (SR–PCX–
99–41) (SR–CBOE–99–59) (Order Granting
Accelerated Approval to Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Permanent Approval of the
Elimination of Position and Exercise Limits for
FLEX Equity Options).
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
Options ‘‘could potentially expand the
depth and liquidity of the FLEX equity
market without significantly increasing
concerns regarding intermarket
manipulations or disruptions of the
options or the underlying securities.’’ 62
Additionally, the Exchange believes
that requiring positions in FLEX Equity
Options that expire on a third Friday-ofthe-month to be aggregated with
positions in non-FLEX Equity Options
on the same underlying security
subjects FLEX Equity Options and nonFLEX Equity Options to the same
position and exercise limits on third
Friday-of-the-month expirations. These
limitations are intended to serve as a
safeguard against potential adverse
effects of large FLEX Equity Option
positions expiring on the same day as
non-FLEX Equity Option positions. As
noted above, Cboe Rules 8.35(d)(3) and
8.42(g)(3) have the same requirements.
The Exchange believes that any
potential risk of manipulative activity is
mitigated by existing surveillance
technologies, procedures, and reporting
requirements at the Exchange, which
allows the Exchange to properly identify
disruptive and/or manipulative trading
activity. In addition to its own
surveillance programs, the Exchange
also works with other SROs and
exchanges on intermarket surveillance
related issues. Through its participation
in ISG, the Exchange shares information
and coordinates inquiries and
investigations with other exchanges
designed to address potential
intermarket manipulation and trading
abuses. The Exchange also notes that
FINRA conducts cross-market
surveillances on behalf of the Exchange
pursuant to a regulatory services
agreement.63 The Exchange also
represents that it is reviewing its
procedures to detect potential
manipulation in light of any changes
required for FLEX Options to confirm
appropriate surveillance coverage.
These procedures utilize daily
monitoring of market activity via
automated surveillance techniques to
identify unusual activity in both options
and their underlying securities and are
designed to protect investors and the
public interest by ensuring that the
Exchange has an adequate surveillance
program in place.
Lastly, the Exchange notes that other
exchanges currently trading FLEX
options have similar position and
exercise limits described above.64
62 See
id.
Exchange notes that it is responsible for
FINRA’s performance under this regulatory services
agreement.
64 See Cboe Rules 8.35(d) and 8.42(g).
63 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
Cash-Settled Exchange Traded Funds
(‘‘ETFs’’)
Introducing cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options will increase order flow to the
Exchange, increase the variety of
options products available for trading,
and provide a valuable tool for investors
to manage risk.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal to permit cash settlement as a
contract term for options on the
specified group of equity securities
would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market as cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options would enable market
participants to receive cash in lieu of
shares of the underlying security, which
would, in turn provide greater
opportunities for market participants to
manage risk through the use of a cashsettled product to the benefit of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange does not believe that allowing
cash settlement as a contract term for
options on the specified group of equity
securities would render the marketplace
for equity options more susceptible to
manipulative practices. As illustrated in
the table above, each of the qualifying
underlying securities is actively traded
and highly liquid and thus would not be
susceptible to manipulation because,
over a six-month period, each security
had an average daily notional value of
at least $500 million and an ADV of at
least 4,680,000 shares, which indicates
that there is substantial liquidity present
in the trading of these securities, and
that there is significant depth and
breadth of market participants providing
liquidity and of investor interest. The
Exchange believes the proposed biannual review to determine eligibility
for an underlying ETF to have cash
settlement as a contract term would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market as
it would permit the Exchange to select
only those underlying ETFs that are
actively traded and have robust
liquidity as each qualifying ETF would
be required to meet the average daily
notional value and average daily volume
requirements, as well as to select the
same underlying ETFs on which other
exchanges may list cash-settled FLEX
ETF Options.65
65 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88131
(February 5, 2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11, 2020)
(SR–NYSEAmer–2019–38) (Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified
by Amendment No. 1, To Allow Certain Flexible
Equity Options To Be Cash Settled). Cboe also filed
an immediately effective rule change to allow
certain FLEX Options to be cash settled. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98044 (August
2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August 8, 2023) (SR–Cboe–
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86017
The Exchange believes the proposed
change that, for FLEX ETF Options, at
least one of exercise style, expiration
date, and exercise price must differ from
options in the non-FLEX market will
provide clarity and eliminate confusion
regarding permissible terms of FLEX
ETF Options, including the proposed
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options.
The Exchange believes that the data
provided by the Exchange supports the
supposition that permitting cash
settlement as a FLEX term for the 48
underlying ETFs that would currently
qualify to have cash settlement as a
contract term would broaden the base of
investors that use FLEX Equity Options
to manage their trading and investment
risk, including investors that currently
trade in the OTC market for customized
options, where settlement restrictions
do not apply.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal to permit cash settlement for
certain FLEX ETF options would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
because the proposed rule change
would provide members and member
organizations with enhanced methods to
manage risk by receiving cash if they
choose to do so instead of the
underlying security. In addition, this
proposal would promote just and
equitable principles of trade and protect
investors and the general public because
cash settlement would provide investors
with an additional tool to manage their
risk. Further, the Exchange notes that
another exchange has previously
received approval that allows for the
trading of cash-settled options, and,
specifically, cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options in an identical manner as the
Exchange proposes to list them pursuant
to this rule filing.66 The proposed rule
change therefore should not raise issues
for the Commission that it has not
previously addressed.
The proposed rule change to permit
cash settlement as a contract term for
options on up to 50 ETFs is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade in that the availability of cash
settlement as a contract term would give
market participants an alternative to
trading similar products in the OTC
market. By trading a product in an
exchange-traded environment (that is
currently traded in the OTC market), the
Exchange would be able to compete
more effectively with the OTC market.
The Exchange believes the proposed
2023–036) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Allow
Certain Flexible Exchange Equity Options To Be
Cash Settled).
66 See supra note 39.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
86018
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
rule change is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices in that it would lead to the
migration of options currently trading in
the OTC market to trading on the
Exchange. Also, any migration to the
Exchange from the OTC market would
result in increased market transparency.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is designed to
remove impediments to and to perfect
the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest in that it should
create greater trading and hedging
opportunities and flexibility. The
proposed rule change should also result
in enhanced efficiency in initiating and
closing out positions and heightened
contra-party creditworthiness due to the
role of OCC as issuer and guarantor of
the proposed cash-settled options.
Further, the proposed rule change
would result in increased competition
by permitting the Exchange to offer
products that are currently available for
trading only in the OTC market and are
approved to trade on another options
exchange.
The Exchange believes that
establishing position limits for cashsettled FLEX ETF Options to be the
same as physically settled options on
the same underlying security, and
aggregating positions in cash-settled
FLEX ETF Options with physically
settled options on the same underlying
security for purposes of calculating
position limits is reasonable and
consistent with the Act. By establishing
the same position limits for cash-settled
FLEX ETF Options as for physically
settled options on the same underlying
security and, importantly, aggregating
such positions, the Exchange believes
that the position limit requirements for
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options should
help to ensure that the trading of cashsettled FLEX ETF Options would not
increase the potential for manipulation
or market disruption and could help to
minimize such incentives. For the same
reasons, the Exchange believes the
proposed exercise limits are reasonable
and consistent with the Act.
Finally, the Exchange represents that
it has an adequate surveillance program
in place to detect manipulative trading
in cash-settled FLEX ETF Options and
the underlying ETFs. Regarding the
proposed cash settlement, the Exchange
would use the same surveillance
procedures currently utilized for the
Exchange’s other FLEX Options. For
surveillance purposes, the Exchange
would have access to information
regarding trading activity in the
pertinent underlying ETFs. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
Exchange believes that limiting cash
settlement to no more than 50
underlying ETFs (currently, 48 ETFs
would be eligible to have cashsettlement as a contract term) would
minimize the possibility of
manipulation due to the robust liquidity
in both the equities and options
markets.
As a self-regulatory organization, the
Exchange recognizes the importance of
surveillance, among other things, to
detect and deter fraudulent and
manipulative trading activity as well as
other violations of Exchange rules and
the federal securities laws. As discussed
above, Phlx has adequate surveillance
procedures in place to monitor trading
in cash-settled FLEX ETF Options and
the underlying securities, including to
detect manipulative trading activity in
both the options and the underlying
ETF.67 The Exchange further notes the
liquidity and active markets in the
underlying ETFs, and the high number
of market participants in both the
underlying ETFs and existing options
on the ETFs, helps to minimize the
possibility of manipulation. The
Exchange further notes that under
Section 19(g) of the Act, the Exchange,
as a self-regulatory organization, is
required to enforce compliance by its
members and persons associated with
its members with the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the Exchange.68 The Exchange believes
67 Among other things, Phlx’s regulatory program
includes cross-market surveillance designed to
identify manipulative and other improper trading,
including spoofing, algorithm gaming, marking the
close and open, as well as more general abusive
behavior related to front running, wash sales, and
quoting/routing, which may occur on the Exchange
and other markets. Furthermore, the Exchange
stated that it has access to information regarding
trading activity in the pertinent underlying
securities as a member of ISG. As it relates to Reg
SHO violations, the Exchange will enforce this
through its Stock-Tied Reg SHO price protections
in Options 3, Section 16(b). Specifically, Options 3,
Section 16(b) provides that when the short sale
price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO is triggered
for a covered security, NES will not execute a short
sale order in the underlying covered security
component of a Complex Order if the price is equal
to or below the current national best bid. However,
NES will execute a short sale order in the
underlying covered security component of a
Complex Order if such order is marked ‘‘short
exempt,’’ regardless of whether it is at a price that
is equal to or below the current national best bid.
If NES cannot execute the underlying covered
security component of a Complex Order in
accordance with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, the
Exchange will cancel back the Complex Order to
the entering member organization. For purposes of
this paragraph, the term ‘‘covered security’’ shall
have the same meaning as in Rule 201(a)(1) of
Regulation SHO. NES will only execute the
underlying covered security component of a
Complex Order if the underlying covered security
component is in accordance with Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO.
68 15 U.S.C. 78s(g).
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
its surveillance, along with the liquidity
criteria and position and exercise limits
requirements, are reasonably designed
to mitigate manipulation and market
disruption concerns and will permit it
to enforce compliance with the
proposed rules and other Exchange
rules in accordance with Section 19(g)
of the Act. The Exchange performs
ongoing evaluations of its surveillance
program to ensure its continued
effectiveness and will continue to
review its surveillance procedures on an
ongoing basis and make any necessary
enhancements and/or modifications that
may be needed for the cash settlement
of FLEX ETF Options.
Additionally, the Exchange will
monitor any effect additional options
series listed under the proposed rule
change may have on market
fragmentation and the capacity of the
Exchange’s automated systems. The
Exchange will take prompt action,
including timely communication with
the Commission and with other selfregulatory organizations responsible for
oversight of trading in options, the
underlying ETFs, and the ETFs’
component securities, should any
unanticipated adverse market effects
develop.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intra-market competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act,
as all member organizations who wish
to trade FLEX Options will be able to
trade such options in the same manner.
Additionally, positions in FLEX Options
of all member organizations will be
subject to the same position limits, and
such positions will be aggregated in the
same manner as described in proposed
Options 8, Section 34(i)(4).
The Exchange also does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on inter-market
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposal
promotes inter-market competition by
providing another alternative (i.e.,
exchange markets) to bilateral OTC
trading of options with flexible terms.
Exchange markets, in contrast with
bilateral OTC trading, are centralized,
transparent, and have the guarantee of
OCC for options traded.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission shall: (a) by order
approve or disapprove such proposed
rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
Phlx–2024–51 on the subject line.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–Phlx–2024–51. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
17:34 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.69
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–25052 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–Phlx–2024–51 and should be
submitted on or before November 19,
2024.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–101415; File No. SR–
CBOE–2024–041]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change With Respect
to Amendments to the Seventh
Amended and Restated Bylaws (the
‘‘CGM Bylaws’’) of Its Parent
Corporation, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
(‘‘Cboe’’ or ‘‘Corporation’’)
October 23, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
11, 2024, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
69 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86019
(the ‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule
change with respect to amendments to
the Seventh Amended and Restated
Bylaws (the ‘‘CGM Bylaws’’) of its
parent corporation, Cboe Global
Markets, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’ or ‘‘Corporation’’).
The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegal
RegulatoryHome.aspx), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
At Cboe’s annual meeting held on
May 16, 2024, Cboe’s stockholders
considered two advisory proposals that
would provide Cboe stockholders with
the right to call a special meeting of the
stockholders provided that a certain
threshold percentage of stockholders
propose to call such a meeting. The two
proposals were submitted separately.
One of the proposals was submitted by
an individual stockholder (‘‘Stockholder
Proposal’’). The other proposal was
submitted by Cboe Management
(‘‘Management Proposal’’). The
Stockholder Proposal, which did not
pass but received 45% of the votes cast,
requested that the CGM Board take steps
to enable stockholders having at least
10% of Cboe’s voting power to call a
special meeting of the stockholders. The
Management Proposal, which passed
with 65% of the votes cast, requested
that the CGM Board take steps to enable
stockholders having at least 25% of
Cboe’s voting power to call a special
meeting of the stockholders.
The Nominating & Governance
Committee of the CGM Board reviewed
the voting results of the Stockholder
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86007-86019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25052]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-101413; File No. SR-Phlx-2024-51]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change To Amend FLEX Floor Trading Rules
October 23, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 8, 2024, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 8, Section 34, FLEX
Trading.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Phlx Options 8, Section 34 rule text was previously amended
by two rule changes which are effective, but not yet operative.
These two prior rule changes will be implemented at the same time as
the rule changes proposed herein. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 97658 (June 7, 2023), 88 FR 38562 (June 13, 2023) (SR-
Phlx-2023-22); and 100321 (June 12, 2024), 89 FR 51580 (June 18,
2024) (SR-Phlx-2024-24). Phlx further delayed the implementation so
that it could implement SR-Phlx-2023-22 while also completing an OCC
industry rule change prior.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 8, Section 34, FLEX Trading.
The Exchange also proposes a technical amendment to Options 8, Section
33, Accommodation Transactions.
Options 8, Section 34
FLEX Options are customized equity, index, and currency contracts
that allow investors to tailor contract terms for exchange-listed
equity and index options. By way of background, in 2023, the Exchange
filed a rule change to amend the manner in which FLEX Options are
transacted on Phlx's Trading Floor.\4\ Thereafter, the Exchange filed
to delay the implementation of SR-Phlx-2023-22 to
[[Page 86008]]
on or before August 30, 2024.\5\ Finally, in 2024, Phlx filed a rule
change to amend FLEX Options rules at Options 8, Section 34(b) and
further delay the implementation of SR-Phlx-2023-22 to the end of Q4
2025.\6\ At this time, the Exchange proposes to further amend the rules
proposed in SR-Phlx-2023-22 and SR-Phx-2024-24, which are immediately
effective, but not yet operative. The Exchange proposes to implement
the amendments in Phlx-2023-22 and SR-Phx-2024-24 at the same time as
the proposed amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97658 (June 7,
2023), 88 FR 38562 (June 13, 2023) (SR-Phlx-2023-22) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Various Options 8 Rules). SR-Phlx-2023-22 amended FLEX Orders in 3
ways. First, the Exchange amended the rules to require FLEX Orders
to be reported into Phlx's Options Floor Based Management System or
``FBMS,'' thereby further automating the execution and reporting of
FLEX Options. All executed FLEX contracts will be reported to OPRA
and sent to the OCC for clearing, similar to all other equity,
equity index and U.S. dollar-settled foreign currency options orders
executed on the Exchange's trading floor. Second, the Exchange
removed its RFQ process including the BBO Improvement Interval
Process, with the rule change. Third, the Exchange reorganized
Options 8, Section 34 to restructure the rule to include additional
information which describes current FLEX trading on Phlx. With
respect to Cabinet Orders, SR-Phlx-2023-22 amended Options 8,
Section 33 to require Cabinet Orders to be reported into FBMS. With
this change, members and member organizations will be required to
record all Cabinet Orders represented in the trading crowd into
FBMS. All executed contracts will be reported to OPRA and sent to
OCC for clearing similar to all other equity, equity index and U.S.
dollar-settled foreign currency options orders executed on the
Exchange's trading floor.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98919 (November 13,
2023), 88 FR 80363 (November 13, 2023) (SR-Phlx-2023-48) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Delay
the Implementation of the FLEX and Cabinet Automation).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100321 (June 12,
2024), 89 FR 51580 (June 18, 2024) (SR-Phlx-2024-24) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Delay Implementation of Certain Exchange Options 8 Rules and Amend
Options 8, Section 34(b)). Phlx further delayed the implementation
so that it could implement SR-Phlx-2023-22 while also completing an
OCC industry rule change prior.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to (1) clarify the Options 8,
Section 34 functionality that will be available with the implementation
of SR-Phlx-2023-22 and SR-Phx-2024-24; (2) list p.m.-settled FLEX Index
Options whose exercise settlement value is derived from closing prices
on the last trading day prior to expiration that expire on or within
two business days of a third Friday-of-the-month expiration day for a
non-FLEX Option; and (2) permit FLEX Options on certain Exchange-Traded
Funds (``ETFs'') to be settled by delivery in cash if the underlying
security meets prescribed criteria. Each change will be described
below.
Options 8, Section 34
First, the Exchange proposes to capitalize certain terms uniformly
throughout Options 8, Section 34. The Exchange proposes to capitalize
the following terms: ``FLEX Options,'' ``FLEX Equity Options,'' ``FLEX
Index Options,'' and ``FLEX Currency Options.'' The Exchange proposes
to amend Options 8, Section 34(f)(4) to define FLEX U. S. dollar-
settled foreign currency options as ``FLEX Currency Options.''
Second, the Exchange proposes to exclude iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
(``IBIT'') from trading as a FLEX Options.
Third, the Exchange proposes to adopt a new Options 8, Section
34(f)(1)(B) to state, ``an underlying equity security or index, as
applicable (the index multiplier for FLEX Index Options is 100).'' This
proposed rule text reflects the current characteristics of underlying
interest for FLEX Option. The proposed rule text brings greater clarity
to the Rule.
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to amend the language in Options 8,
Section 34(f)(3) which was initially amended to state, ``The Exchange
may determine the smallest increment for exercise prices of FLEX
Options not to exceed two decimal places.'' While not substantively
amending the exercise price, the Exchange proposes to amend this
sentence to state, ``The Exchange may determine the smallest increment
for exercise prices of FLEX Options on a class-by-class basis without
going lower than the $0.01.'' The Exchange believes that the proposed
rule text brings greater clarity to Phlx's rule text and is consistent
with rule text in Cboe Rule 5.3(e)(3).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Of note, the Exchange is not proposing to provide for Micro
FLEX Index Options or to allow prices to be expressed as a
percentage value, similar to Cboe, because the Exchange does not
offer these features today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fifth, the Exchange proposes to amend the language in Options 8,
Section 34(f)(5) to provide, ``The expiration date may be any business
day (specified to the day, month, and year) no more than 15 years from
the date on which an executed FLEX equity and index option is submitted
to the System and no more than 3 years from the date on which an
executed FLEX currency option is submitted to the System with exercise
settlement value on the expiration date determined by reference to the
reported level of the index as derived from the opening prices of the
component securities (``a.m. settlement'') or closing prices (``p.m.
settlement'').'' \8\ This amendment aligns the rule text related to
settlement style required for a complex FLEX Order leg with rule text
in Cboe 4.21(b)(4). The Exchange notes that Cboe recently received
approval of its pilot program that permitted it to list p.m.-settled
FLEX Index Options whose exercise settlement value is derived from
closing prices on the last trading day prior to expiration that expire
on or within two business days of a third Friday-of-the-month
expiration day for a non-FLEX Option (``FLEX PM Third Friday
Options'').\9\ Consistent with the Commission's approval of Cboe's
proposal, the Exchange is proposing to allow the listing of FLEX PM
Third Friday Options on Phlx as well, and will align with Cboe Rule
4.21(b)(5)(B)(ii).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange would remove the rule text in current Options
8, Section 34 (f)(5) that provides, ``except that (i) a FLEX index
option that expires on or within two business days prior or
subsequent to a third Friday-of-the-month expiration day for a non-
FLEX option (except quarterly expiring index options) or underlying
currency may only have an.''
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222 (December 21,
2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-018) (``FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval''). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review of pilot data during
the course of the pilot program and a study by the Commission's
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (``DERA'') staff. See FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
\10\ Currently, the only broad-based index option that would be
able to list as a FLEX PM Third Friday Option is the Nasdaq-100
Index option (``NDX'' or ``NDX options''). The Exchange also
received approval to list a third-Friday-of-the-month p.m.
expiration on its standardized market. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 98950 (November 15, 2023), 88 FR 81172 (November 21,
2023) (SR-Phlx-2023-45) (Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To
Permit the Listing and Trading of P.M.-Settled Nasdaq-100 Index
Options With a Third-Friday-of-the-Month Expiration).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sixth, the Exchange proposes to re-style Options 8, Section
34(f)(6) to change the title from ``Settlement'' to ``Settlement
type.'' The Exchange also proposes to add a title at (A), ``FLEX Equity
Options.'' At proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(1) the Exchange
proposes to add rule text to state ``FLEX Options, other than as
permitted in subparagraph (2) below, are settled with physical delivery
of the underlying security.'' The Exchange proposes to also introduce
FLEX Equity Options that are cash-settled in proposed Options 8,
Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2). The Exchange will discuss cash-settled FLEX
Equity Options in greater detail below. The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A) to add a title for FLEX Index Options at
(B) and change the current rule text \11\ to instead provide that FLEX
Index Options may be specified as the index value reported at the
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Initially, the Exchange stated at Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A) that ``respecting FLEX index options, the settlement
value may be specified as the index value reported at the: (i) close
(P.M.-settled); and (ii) opening (A.M.-settled) of trading on the
Exchange. American style index options exercised prior to the
expiration date can only settle based on the closing value on the
exercise date. FLEX index options are settled in U.S. dollars.''
(1) close (P.M.-settled); and (with exercise settlement value
determined by reference to the reported level of the index derived
from the reported closing prices of the component securities);
(2) opening (A.M.-settled) of trading on the Exchange (with
exercise settlement value determined by reference to the reported
level of the index derived from the reported opening prices of the
component securities).
While not substantively amending the rule text, the Exchange
believes that the proposed text adds clarity by noting how the exercise
value is determined depending on whether the option is a.m.-settled or
p.m.-settled. The Exchange proposes to add a title ``FLEX Currency
Options'' to new Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(C). The Exchange also
[[Page 86009]]
proposes a technical amendment to underline ``Market Maker'' in Options
8, Section 34(g)(3). SR-Phlx-2023-22 inadvertently did not underline
that text, thereby designating it as new text.
Seventh, the Exchange proposes to amend Position Limits in Options
8, Section 34(i) to add a new paragraph stating that,
There shall be no position limits for FLEX Equity Options, other
than as set forth in this paragraph and (4) below. Position limits
for FLEX Equity Options where the underlying security is an ETF that
is settled in cash pursuant to subparagraph (f)(6)(A) shall be
subject to the position limits set forth in Options 9, Section 13,
and subject to the exercise limits set forth in Options 9, Section
15. Positions in such cash-settled FLEX Options shall be aggregated
with positions in physically-settled options on the same underlying
ETF for the purpose of calculating the position limits set forth in
Options 9, Section 13, and the exercise limits set forth in Options
9, Section 15.
The Exchange will describe position limits for an ETF that is
settled in cash below with the description of its proposal to permit a
cash-settled ETF.
The Exchange proposes to remove certain numbering as unnecessary in
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(2), which is currently Options 8,
Section 34(i)(1). The Exchange would create a new Options 8, Section
34(i)(2) and title it ``Reports.'' The Exchange would remove
``However'' from this new paragraph and start the paragraph with
``Each.''
The Exchange proposes to add the tile ``Additional Margin
Requirements'' to proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(3).
The Exchange proposes to amend proposed Options 8, Section
34(i)(3), current Options 8, Section 34(i)(3), by renumbering it to
``(4)'' and adding a title ``Aggregation of FLEX Positions.'' Further,
the Exchange proposes to note that, ``For purposes of the position
limits and reporting requirements set forth in this Rule, FLEX Option
positions shall not be aggregated with positions in non-FLEX Options
other than as noted in this subparagraphs (i)(3) and (4), and positions
in FLEX Index Options on a given index shall not be aggregated with
options on any stocks included in the index or with FLEX Index Option
positions on another index.'' \12\ Pursuant to proposed Options 8,
Section 34(i)(4)(a), commencing at the close of trading two business
days prior to the last trading day of the calendar quarter, positions
in P.M.-settled FLEX Index Options (i.e., FLEX Index Options having an
exercise settlement value determined by the level of the index at the
close of trading on the last trading day before expiration) shall be
aggregated with positions in Quarterly Options Series on the same index
with the same expiration and shall be subject to the position limits
set forth in Options 4A, Section 6.\13\ Pursuant to proposed Options 8,
Section 34(i)(4)(b), commencing at the close of trading two business
days prior to the last trading day of the week, positions in FLEX Index
Options that are cash settled \14\ shall be aggregated with positions
in Short Term Option Series on the same underlying (e.g., same
underlying index as a FLEX Index Option) with the same means for
determining exercise settlement value (e.g., opening or closing prices
of the underlying index) and same expiration, and shall be subject to
the position limits set forth in Options 4A, Section 6.\15\ Pursuant to
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4)(c), as long as the options
positions remain open, positions in FLEX Options that expire on a third
Friday-of-the-month expiration day shall be aggregated with positions
in non-FLEX Options on the same underlying, and shall be subject to the
position limits set forth in Options 4A, Section 6, or Options 9,
Section 13, as applicable, and the exercise limits set forth in Options
9, Section 15, as applicable.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Exchange also proposes to change ``shall'' to ``will in
two places in this paragraph.
\13\ See Cboe Rule 8.35(d)(1) for materially identical
provisions.
\14\ The Exchange notes that all FLEX Index Options will be cash
settled. Cash-settled ETFs will be described later in this proposal.
\15\ This is based on Cboe Rule 8.35(d)(2), except the Exchange
does not currently list Credit Default Options and will therefore
not incorporate the applicable portion into its proposed rule.
\16\ See Cboe Rule 8.35(d)(3) for materially identical
provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eighth, the Exchange proposes to amend Exercise Limits in Options
8, Section 34(j) to provide further detail and rearrange the rule text.
The Exchange proposes to relocate the rule text in Options 8, Section
34(j)(1) that provides, ``Positions in FLEX options shall not be taken
into account when calculating exercise limits for non-FLEX options,
except as provided in paragraph (d) above. The minimum exercise size
shall be the lesser of $1 million underlying equivalent value for FLEX
index options, and 25 contracts for FLEX equity and currency options,
or the remaining size of the position.'' Instead, the Exchange proposes
to provide at Options 8, Section 34(j)(1)(a) that, ``The minimum value
size for FLEX Equity Option exercises shall be 25 contracts or the
remaining size of the position, whichever is less.'' Proposed Options
8, Section 34(j)(1)(b) will require that the minimum value size for
FLEX Index Option exercises be $1 million Underlying Equivalent Value
(as defined below) or the remaining Underlying Equivalent Value of the
position, whichever is less.\17\ Proposed Options 8, Section
34(j)(1)(c) will stipulate that except as provided in proposed
subparagraph (i) and (i)(4) above,\18\ FLEX Options shall not be taken
into account when calculating exercise limits for non-FLEX Option
contracts.\19\ Proposed Options 8, Section 34(j)(1)(d) will set forth
the definition of Underlying Equivalent Value as the aggregate value of
a FLEX Index Option (index multiplier times the current index value)
multiplied by the number of FLEX Index Options.\20\ Finally, the
Exchange proposes to add a sentence to the end of Options 8, Section
34(j) that provides, ``There shall be no exercise limits for broad-
based FLEX Index Options (including reduced value option contracts) on
the broad-based index options listed in Options 4A, Section 6(a).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Cboe Rule 8.42(g)(2) for materially identical
provisions.
\18\ As described above, proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4)
will govern the aggregation of FLEX positions generally, while
proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(1) will govern the aggregation of
cash-settled FLEX Equity Options specifically and that positions in
such cash-settled FLEX Equity Options will be aggregated with
positions in physically settled options on the same underlying ETF.
Cash-settled FLEX Equity Options will be discussed later in this
filing.
\19\ See Cboe Rule 8.42(g)(3) for materially identical
provisions.
\20\ See Phlx Options 8, Section 34(b)(8)(D) for materially
identical provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options 8, Section 33
The Exchange also proposes to make a technical amendment to Options
8, Section 33, Accommodation Transactions, at paragraph (e) to remove
correct improperly placed parentheticals from SR-Phlx-2024-22.
Cash-Settled Exchange Traded Funds (``ETFs'')
Generally, FLEX Equity Options will be settled by physical delivery
of the underlying security,\21\ while all FLEX Index Options will be
settled by delivery in cash.\22\ The Exchange proposes to allow FLEX
Equity Options where the underlying security is an ETF to be settled by
delivery in cash if the underlying security meets prescribed criteria.
The Exchange notes that cash-settled FLEX ETF Options will be subject
to the same trading rules and procedures described in Options 8,
Section 34 that will govern the trading
[[Page 86010]]
of other FLEX Options on the Exchange, with the exception of the rules
to accommodate the cash-settlement feature proposed as follows. Today,
NYSE American Rule 903G \23\ and Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A) \24\ allow for
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(1).
\22\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2). As
discussed below, cash settlement is also permitted in the OTC
market.
\23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88131 (February 5,
2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11, 2020) (SR-NYSEAmer-2019-38) (Notice
of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Allow
Certain Flexible Equity Options To Be Cash Settled).
\24\ Cboe also filed an immediately effective rule change to
allow certain FLEX Options to be cash settled. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 98044 (August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August
8, 2023) (SR-Cboe-2023-036) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Allow Certain Flexible
Exchange Equity Options To Be Cash Settled).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To permit cash settlement of certain FLEX ETF Options, the Exchange
proposes rule text in Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2) to provide that
the exercise settlement for a FLEX ETF Option may be by physical
delivery of the underlying ETF or by delivery in cash if the underlying
security, measured over a defined six-month period,\25\ has an average
daily notional value of $500 million or more and a national average
daily volume (``ADV'') of at least 4,680,000 shares.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ As noted below, the Exchange plans to conduct the bi-annual
review on January 1 and July 1 of each year. As such, the six-month
periods will be from January to June, and from July to December each
year.
\26\ See Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii) for materially identical
provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes in Options 8, Section 34(f) that a FLEX
Equity Option overlying an ETF (cash- or physically-settled) may not be
the same type (put or call) and may not have the same exercise style,
expiration date, and exercise price as a non-FLEX Equity Option
overlying the same ETF.\27\ In other words, regardless of whether a
FLEX Equity Option overlying an ETF is cash or physically settled, at
least one of the exercise style (i.e., American-style or European-
style), expiration date, and exercise price of that FLEX Option must
differ from those terms of a non-FLEX Option overlying the same ETF in
order to list such a FLEX Equity Option. For example, suppose a non-
FLEX SPY option (which is physically settled, p.m.-settled and
American-style) with a specific September expiration and exercise price
of 475 is listed for trading. A FLEX Trader could not submit an order
to trade a FLEX SPY option (which is p.m.-settled) that is cash-settled
(or physically settled) and American-style with the same September
expiration and exercise price of 475.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See introductory paragraph of Cboe Rule 4.21(b) for
materially identical provisions. All non-FLEX Equity Options
(including on ETFs) are physically settled. Note all FLEX and non-
FLEX Equity Options (including ETFs) are p.m.-settled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange proposes new Options 8, Section
34(f)(6)(A)(2)(a), which would provide that the Exchange will determine
bi-annually the underlying ETFs that satisfy the notional value and
trading volume requirements in (f)(6)(A)(2) by using trading statistics
for the defined six-month period.\28\ The proposed rule would further
provide that the Exchange will permit cash settlement as a contract
term on no more than 50 underlying ETFs that meet the criteria in this
subparagraph (f)(6)(A)(2) and that if more than 50 underlying ETFs
satisfy the notional value and trading volume requirements, then the
Exchange would select the top 50 ETFs that have the highest average
daily volume.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2)(b), which is
based on Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii)(a). The Exchange plans to
conduct the bi-annual review on January 1 and July 1 of each year.
As such, the six-month periods will be from January to June, and
from July to December each year. The results of the bi-annual review
will be announced via an Options Trader Alert and any new securities
that qualify would be permitted to have cash settlement as a
contract term beginning on February 1 and August 1 of each year. If
the Exchange initially begins listing cash-settled FLEX Equity
Options on a different date (e.g., September 1), it would initially
list securities that qualified as of the last bi-annual review
(e.g., the one conducted on July 1).
\29\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2)(a), which is
based on Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii)(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed new Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2)(b) would further
provide that if the Exchange determines pursuant to the bi-annual
review that an underlying ETF ceases to satisfy the requirements under
proposed (f)(6)(A)(2)(a), any new position overlying such ETF entered
into will be required to have exercise settlement by physical delivery,
and any open cash-settled FLEX ETF Option positions may be traded only
to close the position.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A)(2)(b), which is
based on Cboe Rule 4.21(b)(5)(A)(ii)(b). If a listing is closing
only, pursuant to Options 4, Section 4(a), opening transactions by
Market Makers executed to accommodate closing transactions of other
market participants are permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes it is appropriate to introduce cash
settlement as an alternative contract term to the select group of ETFs
because they are among the most highly liquid and actively traded ETF
securities. As described more fully below, the Exchange believes that
the deep liquidity and robust trading activity in the ETFs identified
by the Exchange as meeting the criteria mitigate against historic
concerns regarding susceptibility to manipulation.
Characteristics of ETFs
ETFs are funds that have their value derived from assets owned. The
net asset value (``NAV'') of an ETF is a daily calculation that is
based off the most recent closing prices of the assets in the fund and
an actual accounting of the total cash in the fund at the time of
calculation. The NAV of an ETF is calculated by taking the sum of the
assets in the fund, including any securities and cash, subtracting out
any liabilities, and dividing that by the number of shares outstanding.
Additionally, each ETF is subject to a creation and redemption
mechanism to ensure the price of the ETF does not fluctuate too far
away from its NAV--which mechanisms reduce the potential for
manipulative activity. Each business day, ETFs are required to make
publicly available a portfolio composition file that describes the
makeup of their creation and redemption ``baskets'' (i.e., a specific
list of names and quantities of securities or other assets designed to
track the performance of the portfolio as a whole). ETF shares are
created when an Authorized Participant,\31\ typically a market maker or
other large institutional investor, deposits the daily creation basket
or cash with the ETF issuer. In return for the creation basket or cash
(or both), the ETF issues to the Authorized Participant a ``creation
unit'' that consists of a specified number of ETF shares. For instance,
IWM is designed to track the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. An
Authorized Participant will purchase all the Russell 2000 constituent
securities in the exact same weight as the index prescribes, then
deliver those shares to the ETF issuer. In exchange, the ETF issuer
gives the Authorized Participant a block of equally valued ETF shares,
on a one-for-one fair value basis. This process can also work in
reverse. A redemption is achieved when the Authorized Participant
accumulates a sufficient number of shares of the ETF to constitute a
creation unit and then exchanges these ETF shares with the ETF issuer,
thereby decreasing the supply of ETF shares in the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ ``Authorized Participant'' means a member or participant of
a clearing agency registered with the Commission, which has a
written agreement with the exchange-traded fund or one of its
service providers that allows the authorized participant to place
orders for the purchase and redemption of creation units. See SEC
Rule 6c-11(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The principal, and perhaps most important, feature of ETFs is their
reliance on an ``arbitrage function'' performed by market participants
that influences the supply and demand of ETF shares and, thus, trading
prices relative to NAV. As noted above, new
[[Page 86011]]
ETF shares can be created and existing shares redeemed based on
investor demand; thus, ETF supply is open-ended. This arbitrage
function helps to keep an ETF's price in line with the value of its
underlying portfolio, i.e., it minimizes deviation from NAV. Generally,
in the Exchange's view, the higher the liquidity and trading volume of
an ETF, the more likely the price of the ETF will not deviate from the
value of its underlying portfolio, making such ETFs less susceptible to
price manipulation.
Trading Data for the ETFs Proposed for Cash Settlement
The Exchange believes that average daily notional value is an
appropriate proxy for selecting underlying securities that are not
readily susceptible to manipulation for purposes of establishing a
settlement price. Average daily notional value considers both the
trading activity and the price of an underlying security. As a general
matter, the more expensive an underlying security's price, the less
cost-effective manipulation could become. Further, manipulation of the
price of a security encounters greater difficulty the more volume that
is traded. To calculate average daily notional value (provided in the
table below), the Exchange summed the notional value of each trade for
each symbol (i.e., the number of shares times the price for each
execution in the security) and divided that total by the number of
trading days in the six-month period (from January 1, 2024 through June
30, 2024) reviewed by the Exchange.
Further, the Exchange proposes that qualifying ETFs also meet an
ADV standard. The purpose for this second criteria is to prevent
unusually expensive underlying securities from qualifying under the
average daily notional value standard while not being one of the most
actively traded securities. The Exchange believes an ADV requirement of
4,680,000 shares a day is appropriate because it represents average
trading in the underlying ETF of 200 shares per second. While no
security is immune from all manipulation, the Exchange believes that
the combination of average daily notional value and ADV as prerequisite
requirements would limit cash settlement of FLEX ETF Options to those
underlying ETFs that would be less susceptible to manipulation in order
to establish a settlement price.
The Exchange believes that the proposed objective criteria would
ensure that only the most robustly traded and deeply liquid ETFs would
qualify to have cash settlement as a contract term. As provided in the
below table, from January 1, 2024 to June 30, 2024, the Exchange would
be able to provide cash settlement as a contract term for FLEX ETF
Options on 48 underlying ETFs, as only this group of securities would
currently meet the requirement of $500 million or more average daily
notional value and a minimum ADV of 4,680,000 shares. The table below
provides the list of the 48 ETFs that, for the period covering January
1, 2024 through June 30, 2024, would be eligible to have cash
settlement as a contract term.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ As noted below, options on GBTC and IBIT are not yet
available.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average daily
notional value (in Average daily
Symbol Security name dollars) (1/1/24-6/ volume (in shares)
30/24) (1/1/24-6/30/24)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGG................................ iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond $806,096,032 8,295,918
ETF.
ARKK............................... ARK Innovation ETF................. 588,267,283 12,516,087
BIL................................ SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF 618,700,170 6,753,925
BND................................ Vanguard Total Bond Market Index 514,223,054 7,130,093
Fund ETF.
EEM................................ iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.. 1,164,586,979 28,535,696
EFA................................ iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.............. 1,104,421,854 14,216,699
EMB................................ iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging 542,748,575 6,149,042
Markets Bond ETF.
EWJ................................ iShares MSCI Japan ETF............. 509,554,399 7,481,823
EWZ................................ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF............ 683,919,536 21,690,846
FXI................................ iShares China Large-Cap ETF........ 1,027,752,868 42,009,611
GBTC............................... Grayscale Bitcoin Trust *.......... 683,447,931 13,105,251
GDX................................ VanEck Gold Miners ETF............. 774,584,258 24,682,952
GLD................................ SPDR Gold Shares................... 1,511,241,142 7,344,884
HYG................................ iShares iBoxx $ High Yield 2,850,542,598 37,011,783
Corporate Bond ETF.
IBIT............................... iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF *........ 1,338,731,551 35,140,151
IEF................................ iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF 743,974,086 7,917,457
IEFA............................... iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF......... 577,266,076 7,997,376
IEMG............................... iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets 519,063,454 10,129,994
ETF.
IVV................................ iShares Core S&P 500 ETF........... 2,774,452,994 5,417,239
IWM................................ iShares Russell 2000 ETF........... 6,731,230,018 33,649,687
IYR................................ iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF....... 537,339,035 6,177,644
KRE................................ SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF...... 676,589,675 13,902,921
KWEB............................... KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. 555,987,739 20,766,407
LQD................................ Shares iBoxx $ Investment Grade 3,007,311,016 27,902,549
Corporate Bond ETF.
NVDL............................... GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily 682,096,758 11,387,201
ETF.
QQQ................................ Invesco QQQ Trust.................. 17,916,413,637 41,065,771
RSP................................ Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF... 982,482,303 6,062,567
SLV................................ iShares Silver Trust............... 602,178,901 24,515,577
SMH................................ VanEck Semiconductor ETF........... 1,783,514,710 8,199,564
SOXL............................... Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 2,703,451,838 64,700,251
3x Shares.
SOXS............................... Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 695,294,352 92,188,004
3x Shares.
SPXL............................... Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X 737,685,244 6,096,062
Shares.
SPY................................ SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust............. 33,559,628,313 66,151,690
SQQQ............................... ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF... 1,461,906,416 131,905,524
TLT................................ iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF. 3,779,166,025 40,682,936
TNA................................ Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X 697,479,128 18,832,200
Shares.
[[Page 86012]]
TQQQ............................... ProShares UltraPro QQQ............. 3,796,209,774 64,941,840
VCIT............................... Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corp 597,752,071 7,484,828
Bond Idx Fund ETF.
VEA................................ Vanguard Tax Managed Fund FTSE 517,396,977 10,583,858
Developed Markets ETF.
VOO................................ Vanguard S&P 500 ETF............... 2,425,398,743 5,177,005
XBI................................ SPDR S&P Biotech ETF............... 979,943,806 10,728,380
XLE................................ Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund..... 1,411,567,713 15,798,449
XLF................................ Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund.. 1,736,012,363 43,157,138
XLI................................ Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund. 1,114,661,946 9,277,779
XLK................................ Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund. 1,274,025,061 6,202,031
XLP................................ Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR 907,491,273 12,108,426
Fund.
XLU................................ Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund.. 944,774,031 14,540,920
XLV................................ Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund 1,127,277,467 7,876,680
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Options on this ETF are not yet available.
The Exchange believes that permitting cash settlement as a contract
term for FLEX ETF Options for the ETFs in the above table would broaden
the base of investors that use FLEX Equity Options to manage their
trading and investment risk, including investors that currently trade
in the OTC market for customized options, where settlement restrictions
do not apply.
The Exchange notes that the SEC has previously approved a rule
filing of another exchange that allowed for the trading of cash-settled
options \33\ and, specifically, cash-settled FLEX ETF Options (which
the Exchange proposes to list in the same manner as that exchange).\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See, e.g., PHLX FX Options traded on Nasdaq PHLX and S&P
500[supreg] Index Options traded on Cboe Options Exchange. The
Commission approved, on a pilot basis, the listing and trading of
RealDayTM Options on the SPDR S&P 500 Trust on the BOX
Options Exchange LLC (``BOX''). See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 79936 (February 2, 2017), 82 FR 9886 (February 8, 2017)
(``RealDay Pilot Program''). The RealDay Pilot Program was extended
until February 2, 2019. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
82414 (December 28, 2017), 83 FR 577 (January 4, 2018) (SR-BOX-2017-
38). The RealDay Pilot Program was never implemented by BOX. See
also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56251 (August 14, 2007),
72 FR 46523 (August 20, 2007) (SR-Amex-2004-27) (Order approving
listing of cash-settled Fixed Return Options (``FROs'')); and 71957
(April 16, 2014), 79 FR 22563 (April 22, 2014) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-06)
(Order approving name change from FROs to ByRDs and re-launch of
these products, with certain modifications.
\34\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 88131 (February 5,
2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11, 2020) (SR-NYSEAMER-2019-38) (Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to
Allow Certain Flexible Equity Options To Be Cash Settled); 97231
(March 31, 2023), 88 FR 20587 (April 6, 2023) (SR-NYSEAMER-2023-22)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change to
Make a Clarifying Change to the Term Settlement Style Applicable to
Flexible Exchange Options); and 98044 (August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548
(August 8, 2023) (SR-Cboe-2023-036) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Allow Certain Flexible
Exchange Equity Options To Be Cash Settled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, equity options are settled physically at The Options
Clearing Corporation (``OCC''), i.e., upon exercise, shares of the
underlying security must be assumed or delivered. Physical settlement
may possess certain risks with respect to volatility and movement of
the underlying security at expiration against which market participants
may need to hedge. The Exchange believes cash settlement may be
preferable to physical delivery in some circumstances as it does not
present the same risk. If an issue with the delivery of the underlying
security arises, it may become more expensive (and time consuming) to
reverse the delivery because the price of the underlying security would
almost certainly have changed. Reversing a cash payment, on the other
hand, would not involve any such issue because reversing a cash
delivery would simply involve the exchange of cash. Additionally, with
physical settlement, market participants that have a need to generate
cash would have to sell the underlying security while incurring the
costs associated with liquidating their position as well as the risk of
an adverse movement in the price of the underlying security.
With respect to position and exercise limits, cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options would be subject to the position limits set forth in proposed
Options 8, Section 34(i). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to add
Options 8, Section 34(i)(1), which would provide that a position in
FLEX Equity Options where the underlying security is an ETF that is
settled in cash pursuant to Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A) shall be
subject to the position limits set forth in Options 9, Section 13, and
subject to the exercise limits set forth in Options 9, Section 15.\35\
The proposed rule would further state that positions in such cash-
settled FLEX Equity Options shall be aggregated with positions in
physically settled options on the same underlying ETF for the purpose
of calculating the position limits set forth in Options 9, Section 13
and the exercise limits set forth in Options 9, Section 15.\36\ The
Exchange further proposes to add in Options 8, Section 34(i)(1) a
cross-reference to subparagraph (f)(6)(A), as subparagraph (i)(1) would
also contain provisions about position limits for FLEX Equity Options
that would be exceptions to the first sentence in this paragraph
stating that FLEX Equity Options have no position limits. The Exchange
also proposes to add in paragraph (i)(4), a cross-reference to proposed
subparagraphs (i)(1) as the proposed rule adds language regarding
aggregation of positions for purposes of position limits, which will be
covered by paragraph (i)(4). Given that each of the underlying ETFs
that would currently be eligible to have cash-settlement as a contract
term have established position and exercise limits applicable to
physically settled options, the Exchange believes it is appropriate for
the same position and exercise limits to also apply to cash-settled
options. Accordingly, of the 48 underlying securities that would
currently be
[[Page 86013]]
eligible to have cash settlement as a FLEX contract term, 33 would have
a position limit of 250,000 contracts pursuant to Options 9, Section
13(d)(5).\37\ Further, pursuant to Supplementary Material .01 to
Options 9, Section 13, seven would have a position limit of 500,000
contracts (EWJ, EWZ, TLT, HYG, XLF, LQD, and GDX); four (EEM, FXI, IWM,
and EFA) would have a position limit of 1,000,000 contracts; one (QQQ)
would have a position limit of 1,800,000 contracts; and one (SPY) would
have a position limit of 3,600,000.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ The Exchange proposes to add to proposed Options 8, Section
34(i)(1) a cross reference to proposed subparagraph (f)(6)(A), as
proposed Section 34(i)(1) also contains provisions about position
limits for FLEX Equity Options that would be exceptions to the
statement in proposed Section (i)(1) that FLEX Equity Options have
no position limits (in addition to the language in proposed
34(i)(1)). The Exchange also proposes to add to proposed Options 8,
Section 34(i)(4) a cross-reference to proposed subparagraph
subparagraph (i)(1), as the proposed rule adds language regarding
aggregation of positions for purposes of position limits, which will
be covered in proposed Section 34(i)(4).
\36\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(1), which is based on
Cboe Rule 8.35(c)(1)(B). The aggregation of position and exercise
limits would include all positions on physically settled FLEX and
non-FLEX Options on the same underlying ETFs.
\37\ Options 9, Section 13(d)(5) provides that to be eligible
for the 250,000 contract limit, either the most recent six (6) month
trading volume of the underlying security must have totalled at
least 100 million shares or the most recent six-month trading volume
of the underlying security must have totalled at least seventy-five
(75) million shares and the underlying security must have at least
300 million shares currently outstanding. Further as noted above,
options on GBTC and IBIT are not yet available.
\38\ These were based on position limits as of September 13,
2024. Position limits are available on at https://www.theocc.com.
Position limits for ETFs are always determined in accordance with
the Exchange's Rules regarding position limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange understands that cash-settled ETF options are
currently traded in the OTC market by a variety of market participants,
e.g., hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, and pension funds.\39\
These options are not fungible with the exchange listed options. The
Exchange believes some of these market participants would prefer to
trade comparable instruments on an exchange, where they would be
cleared and settled through a regulated clearing agency. The Exchange
expects that users of these OTC products would be among the primary
users of exchange-traded cash-settled FLEX ETF Options. The Exchange
also believes that the trading of cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would
allow these same market participants to better manage the risk
associated with the volatility of underlying equity positions given the
enhanced liquidity that an exchange-traded product would bring.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ As noted above, other options exchanges have received
approval to list certain cash-settled FLEX ETF Options. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88131 (February 5, 2020), 85 FR
7806 (February 11, 2020) (SR-NYSEAmer-2019-38) (Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Allow
Certain Flexible Equity Options To Be Cash Settled). Cboe also filed
an immediately effective rule change to allow certain FLEX Options
to be cash settled. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98044
(August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August 8, 2023) (SR-Cboe-2023-036)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Allow Certain Flexible Exchange Equity Options To Be Cash
Settled).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Exchange's view, cash-settled FLEX ETF Options traded on the
Exchange would have three important advantages over the contracts that
are traded in the OTC market. First, as a result of greater
standardization of contract terms, exchange-traded contracts should
develop more liquidity. Second, counter-party credit risk would be
mitigated by the fact that the contracts are issued and guaranteed by
OCC. Finally, the price discovery and dissemination provided by the
Exchange and its members would lead to more transparent markets. The
Exchange believes that its ability to offer cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options would aid it in competing with the OTC market and at the same
time expand the universe of products available to interested market
participants. The Exchange believes that an exchange-traded alternative
may provide a useful risk management and trading vehicle for market
participants and their customers. Further, the Exchange believes
listing cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would provide investors with
competition on an exchange platform, as other options exchanges have
received Commission approval to list the same options.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See supra note 39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that OCC has received approval from the
Commission for rule changes that will accommodate the clearance and
settlement of cash-settled ETF options.\41\ The Exchange has also
analyzed its capacity and represents that it and The Options Price
Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary systems capacity to
handle the additional traffic associated with the listing of cash-
settled FLEX ETF Options. The Exchange believes any additional traffic
that would be generated from the introduction of cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options would be manageable. The Exchange expects that members will not
have a capacity issue as a result of this proposed rule change. The
Exchange also does not believe this proposed rule change will cause
fragmentation of liquidity. The Exchange will monitor the trading
volume associated with the additional options series listed as a result
of this proposed rule change and the effect (if any) of these
additional series on market fragmentation and on the capacity of the
Exchange's automated systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-94910 (May 13,
2022), 87 FR 30531 (May 19, 2022) (SR-OCC-2022-003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not believe that allowing cash settlement as a
contract term would render the marketplace for equity options more
susceptible to manipulative practices. The Exchange believes that
manipulating the settlement price of cash-settled FLEX ETF Options
would be difficult based on the size of the market for the underlying
ETFs that are the subject of this proposed rule change. The Exchange
notes that each underlying ETF in the table above is sufficiently
active to alleviate concerns about potential manipulative activity.
Further, in the Exchange's view, the vast liquidity in the 48
underlying ETFs that would currently be eligible to be traded as cash-
settled FLEX options under the proposal ensures a multitude of market
participants at any given time. Moreover, given the high level of
participation among market participants that enter quotes and/or orders
in physically settled options on these ETFs, the Exchange believes it
would be very difficult for a single participant to alter the price of
the underlying ETF or options overlying such ETF in any significant way
without exposing the would-be manipulator to regulatory scrutiny. The
Exchange further believes any attempt to manipulate the price of the
underlying ETF or options overlying such ETF would also be cost
prohibitive. As a result, the Exchange believes there is significant
participation among market participants to prevent manipulation of
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options.
Still, the Exchange believes it has an adequate surveillance
program in place and intends to apply the same program procedures to
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options that it applies to the Exchange's other
options products.\42\ FLEX options products and their respective
symbols will be integrated into the Exchange's existing surveillance
system architecture and will thus be subject to the relevant
surveillance processes, as applicable. The Exchange believes that the
existing surveillance procedures at the Exchange are capable of
properly identifying unusual and/or illegal trading activity, which
procedures the Exchange would utilize to surveil for aberrant trading
in cash-settled FLEX ETF Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ For example, the regulatory program for the Exchange
includes surveillance designed to identify manipulative and other
improper options trading, including, spoofing, marking the close,
front running, wash sales, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to regulatory scrutiny, the Exchange believes its
existing surveillance technologies and procedures adequately address
potential concerns regarding possible manipulation of the settlement
value at or near the close of the market. The Exchange notes that the
regulatory program operated by and overseen by
[[Page 86014]]
Phlx \43\ includes cross-market surveillance designed to identify
manipulative and other improper trading, including spoofing, algorithm
gaming, marking the close and open, as well as more general, abusive
behavior related to front running, wash sales, and quoting/routing,
which may occur on the Exchange or other markets.\44\ These cross-
market patterns incorporate relevant data from various markets beyond
the Exchange and its affiliates and from markets not affiliated with
the Exchange. The Exchange represents that, today, its existing trading
surveillances are adequate to monitor trading in the underlying ETFs
and subsequent trading of options on those securities listed on the
Exchange. Further, with the introduction of cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options, the Exchange would leverage its existing surveillances to
monitor trading in the underlying ETFs and subsequent trading of
options on those securities listed on the Exchange with respect to
cash-settled FLEX ETF options.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ Phlx maintains a regulatory services agreement with
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') whereby
FINRA provides certain regulatory services to the exchanges,
including cross-market surveillance, investigation, and enforcement
services.
\44\ As it relates to Reg SHO violations, the Exchange will
enforce this through its Stock-Tied Reg SHO price protections in
Options 3, Section 16(b). See supra note 65 for Stock-Tied Reg SHO
discussion. NES will only execute the underlying covered security
component of a Complex Order if the underlying covered security
component is in accordance with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO.
Additionally, FINRA's regulatory program addresses Reg SHO
compliance for its member firms (which includes Exchange Members).
\45\ Such surveillance procedures generally focus on detecting
securities trading subject to opening price manipulation, closing
price manipulation, layering, spoofing or other unlawful activity
impacting an underlying security, the option, or both. The Exchange
has price movement alerts, unusual market activity and order book
alerts active for all trading symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, for options, the Exchange utilizes an array of
patterns that monitor manipulation of options, or manipulation of
equity securities (regardless of venue) for the purpose of impacting
options prices on the Exchange (i.e., mini-manipulation strategies).
That surveillance coverage is initiated once options begin trading on
the Exchange. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the cross-market
surveillance performed by the Exchange or FINRA, on behalf of the
Exchange, coupled with Phlx's own monitoring for violative activity on
the Exchange comprise a comprehensive surveillance program that is
adequate to monitor for manipulation of the underlying ETF and
overlying option. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the existing
surveillance procedures at the Exchange are capable of properly
identifying unusual and/or illegal trading activity, which the Exchange
would utilize to surveil for aberrant trading in cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options.
In addition to the surveillance procedures and processes described
above, improvements in audit trails (i.e., the Consolidated Audit
Trail), recordkeeping practices, and inter-exchange cooperation over
the last two decades have greatly increased the Exchange's ability to
detect and punish attempted manipulative activities. In addition, the
Exchange is a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'').
The ISG members work together to coordinate surveillance and
investigative information sharing in the stock and options markets. For
surveillance purposes, the Exchange would therefore have access to
information regarding trading activity in the pertinent underlying
securities.
The proposed rule change is designed to allow investors seeking to
effect cash-settled FLEX ETF Options with the opportunity for a
different method of settling option contracts at expiration if they
choose to do so. As noted above, market participants may choose cash
settlement because physical settlement possesses certain risks with
respect to volatility and movement of the underlying security at
expiration that market participants may need to hedge against. The
Exchange believes that offering innovative products flows to the
benefit of the investing public. A robust and competitive market
requires that exchanges respond to members' evolving needs by
constantly improving their offerings. Such efforts would be stymied if
exchanges were prohibited from offering innovative products for reasons
that are generally debated in academic literature. The Exchange
believes that introducing cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would further
broaden the base of investors that use FLEX Equity Options to manage
their trading and investment risk, including investors that currently
trade in the OTC market for customized options, where settlement
restrictions do not apply. The proposed rule change is also designed to
encourage market makers to shift liquidity from the OTC market onto the
Exchange, which, it believes, would enhance the process of price
discovery conducted on the Exchange through increased order flow. The
Exchange also believes that this may open up cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options to more retail investors. The Exchange does not believe that
this proposed rule change raises any unique regulatory concerns because
existing safeguards--such as position limits (and the aggregation of
cash-settled positions with physically-settled positions), exercise
limits (and the aggregation of cash-settled positions with physically-
settled positions), and reporting requirements--would continue to
apply. The Exchange believes the proposed position and exercise limits
may further help mitigate the concerns that the limits are designed to
address about the potential for manipulation and market disruption in
the options and the underlying securities.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(1), which is based on
Cboe Rule 8.35(c)(1)(B). The aggregation of position and exercise
limits would include all positions on physically settled FLEX and
non-FLEX Options on the same underlying ETFs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the novel characteristics of cash-settled FLEX ETF Options,
the Exchange will conduct a review of the trading in cash-settled FLEX
ETF Options over an initial five-year period. The Exchange will furnish
five reports to the Commission based on this review, the first of which
would be provided within 60 days after the first anniversary of the
initial listing date of the first cash-settled FLEX ETF Option under
the proposed rule and each subsequent annual report to be provided
within 60 days after the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary of
such initial listing. At a minimum, each report will provide a
comparison between the trading volume of all cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options listed under the proposed rule and physically settled options
on the same underlying security, the liquidity of the market for such
options products and the underlying ETF, and any manipulation concerns
arising in connection with the trading of cash-settled FLEX ETF Options
under the proposed rule. The Exchange will also provide additional data
as requested by the Commission during this five year period. The
reports will also discuss any recommendations the Exchange may have for
enhancements to the listing standards based on its review. The Exchange
believes these reports will allow the Commission and the Exchange to
evaluate, among other things, the impact such options have, and any
potential adverse effects, on price volatility and the market for the
underlying ETFs, the component securities underlying the ETFs, and the
options on the same underlying ETFs and make appropriate
recommendations, if any, in response to the reports.
Implementation
The Exchange proposes to implement this rule change on or before
December 23, 2024. The Exchange will announce
[[Page 86015]]
an implementation date by issuing an Options Trader Alert.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\47\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act.\48\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \49\
requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)
\48\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\49\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permissible Series
The Exchange's proposal to not authorize for trading a FLEX Option
on iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (``IBIT'') is consistent with ISE's
Approval Order of iShares Bitcoin Trust.\50\ ISE stated that the
position limit for IBIT options shall be 25,000 contracts.\51\ Phlx
proposes to exclude IBIT Options from trading as a FLEX Options to
continue to limit the position limits for IBIT Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101128 (September
20, 2024), 89 FR 78942 (September 26, 2024) (SR-ISE-2024-03) (Notice
of Filing of Amendment Nos. 4 and 5 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1,
4, and 5, To Permit the Listing and Trading of Options on the
iShares Bitcoin Trust).
\51\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Characteristics of ETFs
The Exchange's proposal to provide in Options 8, Section
34(f)(1)(B) that, ``an underlying equity security or index, as
applicable (the index multiplier for FLEX Index Options is 100)'' is
consistent with the Act and will protect investors and the general
public because this rule text adds transparency to the current
characteristics of underlying interest for FLEX Option.
Minimum Trading Increments
The Exchange's proposal to amend Options 8, Section 34(f)(3) to
provide that, ``The Exchange may determine the smallest increment for
exercise prices of FLEX Options on a class-by-class basis without going
lower than the $0.01.'' is consistent with the Act and will protect
investors and the general public because this rule text provides clear,
transparent language regarding the minimum trading increments for FLEX
Options. The language is consistent with Cboe Rule 5.3(e)(3) except the
Exchange is not proposing to provide for Micro FLEX Index Options or to
allow prices to be expressed as a percentage value because the Exchange
does not offer these features today.
FLEX PM Third Friday Options
The Exchange's proposal to amend Options 8, Section 34(f)(5) to
allow the listing of FLEX PM Third Friday Options, is consistent with
the Commission's recent approval of Cboe's proposal to make its pilot a
permanent program.\52\ The Exchange believes that aligning to Cboe will
allow Phlx to compete effectively with Cboe's product offering. Like
Cboe, the Exchange believes that FLEX PM Third Friday Options will
provide investors with greater trading opportunities and flexibility.
The Exchange notes that the Commission recently approved proposals to
make other pilots permitting p.m.-settlement of index options permanent
after finding those pilots were consistent with the Act and the options
subject to those pilots had no significant impact on the market.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222 (December 21,
2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-018) (``FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval''). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review of pilot data during
the course of the pilot program and a study by the Commission's
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (``DERA'') staff. See FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
\53\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 98454 (September
20, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-005) (order approving proposed rule change
to make permanent the operation of a program that allows the
Exchange to list p.m.-settled third Friday-of-the-month SPX options
series) (``SPXPM Approval''); 98455 (September 20, 2023) (SR-CBOE-
2023-019) (order approving proposed rule change to make permanent
the operation of a program that allows the Exchange to list p.m.-
settled third Friday-of-the-month XSP and MRUT options series)
(``XSP and MRUT Approval''); and 98456 (September 20, 2023) (SR-
CBOE-2023-020) (order approving proposed rule change to make the
nonstandard expirations pilot program permanent) (``Nonstandard
Approval''). See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 98451
(September 20, 2023), 88 FR 66088 (September 26, 2023) (SR-Phlx-
2023-07) (Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Make Permanent Certain P.M.-Settled
Pilots); and 98950 (November 15, 2023), 88 FR 81172 (November 21,
2023) (SR-Phlx-2023-45) (Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To
Permit the Listing and Trading of P.M.-Settled Nasdaq-100 Index
Options With a Third-Friday-of-the-Month Expiration).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further believes that permitting Phlx to list FLEX PM
Third Friday Options, similar to Cboe, will remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system and protect investors, while maintaining a fair and orderly
market. As described in the FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, Cboe
observed no significant adverse market impact or identified any
meaningful regulatory concerns during the nearly 14-year operation of
the FLEX PM Third Friday Program as a pilot nor during the 15 years
since P.M.-settled index options (SPX) were reintroduced to the
marketplace.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ Notably, Cboe did not identify any significant economic
impact (including on pricing or volatility or in connection with
reversals) on related futures, the underlying indexes, or the
underlying component securities of the underlying indexes
surrounding the close as a result of the quantity of FLEX PM Third
Friday Options or the amount of expiring open interest in FLEX PM
Third Friday Options, nor any demonstrated capacity for options
hedging activity to impact volatility in the underlying markets. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222 (December 21, 2023), 88 FR
89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-018) (``FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval''). In support of making the pilot a permanent
program, Cboe cited to its own review of pilot data during the
course of the pilot program and a study by the Commission's Division
of Economic and Risk Analysis (``DERA'') staff. See FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the FLEX Settlement Pilot Approval, the DERA staff
study and corresponding Cboe study concluded that a significantly
larger amount of non-FLEX p.m.-settled index options had no significant
adverse market impact and caused no meaningful regulatory concerns.
Therefore, the Exchange believes it is reasonable to conclude that the
relatively small amount of FLEX Index Option volume would similarly
have no significant adverse market impact or cause no meaningful
regulatory concerns.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222 (December 21,
2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-018) (``FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval''). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review of pilot data during
the course of the pilot program and a study by the Commission's
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (``DERA'') staff. See FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35. Additionally, these
studies measured any impact on related futures, the underlying
indexes, or the underlying component securities of the underlying
indexes surrounding the close. Despite FLEX SPX options (which
represent approximately half of the year-to-date 2023 volume of FLEX
Index Options but only approximately 0.3% of total SPX volume) not
being included in the DERA staff study and corresponding Cboe study,
those studies concluded that during the time periods covered (which
included the period of time in which the Pilot Program has been
operating), there was no significant economic impact on the
underlying index or related products. Therefore, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to conclude that any FLEX SPX Options that
executed during the timeframes covered by the studies had no
significant impact on the underlying index or related products, as
neither DERA staff nor Cboe observed any significant economic impact
on the underlying index or related product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes the introduction of FLEX PM options had
[[Page 86016]]
no significant impact on the market quality of corresponding a.m.-
settled options or other options. As discussed in the FLEX Settlement
Pilot Approval, Cboe's analysis conducted after the introduction of
SPXW options with Tuesday and Thursday expirations demonstrated no
statistically significant impact on the bid-ask or effective spreads of
SPXW options with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations after
trading in the SPXW options with Tuesday and Thursday expirations
began.\56\ Further, Cboe concluded that large FLEX PM Third Friday
Options trades had no material negative impact (and likely no impact)
on quote quality of non-FLEX a.m.-settled options overlying the same
index with similar terms as the FLEX PM Third Friday Option upon
evaluating data that showed that the spreads were relatively stable
before and after large trades.\57\ Therefore, the Exchange believes
Cboe's evaluation effectively demonstrates it is likely that FLEX PM
Third Friday Options have had no significant negative impact on the
market quality of non-FLEX Options with a.m.-settlement.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222 (December 21,
2023), 88 FR 89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-018) (``FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval''). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review of pilot data during
the course of the pilot program and a study by the Commission's
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (``DERA'') staff. See FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
\57\ Specifically, Cboe evaluated each FLEX PM Third Friday
Options trade for more than 500 contracts that occurred on Cboe
during a two-year timeframe and analyzed the market quality
(specifically, the average time-weighted quote spread and size 30
minutes prior to the trade and the average time-weighted quote
spread and size 30 minutes after the trade) of series non-FLEX a.m.-
settled options overlying the same index with similar terms as the
FLEX PM Third Friday Option that traded (time to expiration, type
(call or put), and strike price) as set forth in the Cboe's data.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99222 (December 21, 2023),
88 FR 89771 (December 28, 2023) (SR-CBOE-2023-018) (``FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval''). In support of making the pilot a
permanent program, Cboe cited to its own review of pilot data during
the course of the pilot program and a study by the Commission's
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (``DERA'') staff. See FLEX
Settlement Pilot Approval, notes 18 and 35.
\58\ The Exchange acknowledges that, while FLEX PM Third Friday
Options has historically represented a very small percentage of
overall volume, it is possible trading in these options may grow in
the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the significant changes in the closing procedures of
the primary markets in recent decades, including considerable advances
in trading systems and technology, has significantly minimized risks of
any potential impact of FLEX PM Third Friday Options on the underlying
cash markets. As such, the Exchange believes that this proposal does
not raise any unique or prohibitive regulatory concerns and that such
trading has not, and will not, adversely impact fair and orderly
markets on expiration Fridays for the underlying indexes or their
component securities.
FLEX Options Terms
The Exchange's proposal to amend Options 8, Section 34(f)(6)(A) to
note how the exercise value is determined depending on whether it is
a.m.-settled or p.m.-settled is consistent with the Act and will
protect investors and the general public because this rule text adds
transparency to the current settlement of FLEX Index Options.
Position and Exercise Limits
Position and exercise limits are designed to address potential
manipulative schemes and adverse market impacts surrounding the use of
options, such as disrupting the market in the security underlying the
options. While position and exercise limits should address and
discourage the potential for manipulative schemes and adverse market
impact, if such limits are set too low, participation in the options
market may be discouraged. The Exchange believes that any decision
regarding imposing position and exercise limits for FLEX Options must
therefore be balanced between mitigating concerns of any potential
manipulation and the cost of inhibiting potential hedging activity that
could be used for legitimate economic purposes.
As it relates to FLEX Index Options, the Exchange believes that the
proposed amendments to position and exercise limits in Options 8,
Section 34(i) and (j) are reasonably designed to prevent a member
organization from using FLEX Index Options to evade the position limits
applicable to comparable non-FLEX Index Options. Further, by
establishing the proposed position and exercise limits for FLEX Index
Options and, importantly, aggregating such positions in the manner
described in proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4) the Exchange believes
that the position and exercise limit requirements for FLEX Index
Options should help to ensure that the trading of FLEX Index Options
would not increase the potential for manipulation or market disruption
and could help to minimize such incentives. The Exchange also notes
that proposed position and exercise limits are consistent with the
rules of other options exchanges that offer FLEX Index Options, as well
as the rules of its own standard non-FLEX index options market, and
therefore raise no novel issues for the Commission.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ See Cboe Rules 8.35(a), (b), (d), and 8.42(g) and Phlx
Options 4A, Sections 6(a), 9(a)(13), and 9(a)(14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As it relates to FLEX Equity Options, while no position limits are
proposed for FLEX Equity Options, there are several mitigating factors,
which include aggregation of FLEX Equity Option and non-FLEX Equity
Option positions that expire on a third Friday-of-the-month and
subjecting those positions to position and exercise limits, and daily
monitoring of market activity. Similar to the other exchanges that
trade FLEX Equity Options, the Exchange believes that eliminating
position and exercise limits for FLEX Equity Options, while requiring
positions in FLEX Equity Options that expire on a third Friday-of-the-
month to be aggregated with positions in non-FLEX Equity Options on the
same underlying security,\60\ removes impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
because it allows the Exchange to create a product and market that is
an improved but comparable alternative to the OTC market in customized
options. OTC transactions occur through bilateral agreements, the terms
of which are not publicly disclosed to the marketplace. As such, OTC
transactions do not contribute to the price discovery process that
exists on a public exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ See proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4)(c) and Section
34(j)(1)(c). See also Cboe Rules 8.35(d)(3) and 8.42(g)(3); NYSE
Arca Rules 5.35-O(a)(iii), (b) and 5.36-O; NYSE American Rules 906G
and 907G; and Phlx Options 8, Section 34(e) and (f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed elimination of position and
exercise limits for FLEX Equity Options may encourage market
participants to transfer their liquidity demands from OTC markets to
exchanges and enable liquidity providers to provide additional
liquidity to Phlx through transactions in FLEX Equity Options. The
Exchange notes that the Commission previously approved the elimination
of position and exercise limits for FLEX Equity Options, finding that
such elimination would allow exchanges ``to better compete with the
growing OTC market in customized equity options, thereby encouraging
fair competition among brokers and dealers and exchange markets.'' \61\
The Commission has also stated that the elimination of position and
exercise limits for FLEX Equity
[[Page 86017]]
Options ``could potentially expand the depth and liquidity of the FLEX
equity market without significantly increasing concerns regarding
intermarket manipulations or disruptions of the options or the
underlying securities.'' \62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42223 (December 10,
1999), 64 FR 71158, 71159 (December 20, 1999) (SR-Amex-99-40) (SR-
PCX-99-41) (SR-CBOE-99-59) (Order Granting Accelerated Approval to
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Permanent Approval of the
Elimination of Position and Exercise Limits for FLEX Equity
Options).
\62\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange believes that requiring positions in
FLEX Equity Options that expire on a third Friday-of-the-month to be
aggregated with positions in non-FLEX Equity Options on the same
underlying security subjects FLEX Equity Options and non-FLEX Equity
Options to the same position and exercise limits on third Friday-of-
the-month expirations. These limitations are intended to serve as a
safeguard against potential adverse effects of large FLEX Equity Option
positions expiring on the same day as non-FLEX Equity Option positions.
As noted above, Cboe Rules 8.35(d)(3) and 8.42(g)(3) have the same
requirements.
The Exchange believes that any potential risk of manipulative
activity is mitigated by existing surveillance technologies,
procedures, and reporting requirements at the Exchange, which allows
the Exchange to properly identify disruptive and/or manipulative
trading activity. In addition to its own surveillance programs, the
Exchange also works with other SROs and exchanges on intermarket
surveillance related issues. Through its participation in ISG, the
Exchange shares information and coordinates inquiries and
investigations with other exchanges designed to address potential
intermarket manipulation and trading abuses. The Exchange also notes
that FINRA conducts cross-market surveillances on behalf of the
Exchange pursuant to a regulatory services agreement.\63\ The Exchange
also represents that it is reviewing its procedures to detect potential
manipulation in light of any changes required for FLEX Options to
confirm appropriate surveillance coverage. These procedures utilize
daily monitoring of market activity via automated surveillance
techniques to identify unusual activity in both options and their
underlying securities and are designed to protect investors and the
public interest by ensuring that the Exchange has an adequate
surveillance program in place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\63\ The Exchange notes that it is responsible for FINRA's
performance under this regulatory services agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Exchange notes that other exchanges currently trading
FLEX options have similar position and exercise limits described
above.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ See Cboe Rules 8.35(d) and 8.42(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash-Settled Exchange Traded Funds (``ETFs'')
Introducing cash-settled FLEX ETF Options will increase order flow
to the Exchange, increase the variety of options products available for
trading, and provide a valuable tool for investors to manage risk.
The Exchange believes that the proposal to permit cash settlement
as a contract term for options on the specified group of equity
securities would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market as cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would enable
market participants to receive cash in lieu of shares of the underlying
security, which would, in turn provide greater opportunities for market
participants to manage risk through the use of a cash-settled product
to the benefit of investors and the public interest. The Exchange does
not believe that allowing cash settlement as a contract term for
options on the specified group of equity securities would render the
marketplace for equity options more susceptible to manipulative
practices. As illustrated in the table above, each of the qualifying
underlying securities is actively traded and highly liquid and thus
would not be susceptible to manipulation because, over a six-month
period, each security had an average daily notional value of at least
$500 million and an ADV of at least 4,680,000 shares, which indicates
that there is substantial liquidity present in the trading of these
securities, and that there is significant depth and breadth of market
participants providing liquidity and of investor interest. The Exchange
believes the proposed bi-annual review to determine eligibility for an
underlying ETF to have cash settlement as a contract term would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market as
it would permit the Exchange to select only those underlying ETFs that
are actively traded and have robust liquidity as each qualifying ETF
would be required to meet the average daily notional value and average
daily volume requirements, as well as to select the same underlying
ETFs on which other exchanges may list cash-settled FLEX ETF
Options.\65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88131 (February 5,
2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11, 2020) (SR-NYSEAmer-2019-38) (Notice
of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Allow
Certain Flexible Equity Options To Be Cash Settled). Cboe also filed
an immediately effective rule change to allow certain FLEX Options
to be cash settled. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98044
(August 2, 2023), 88 FR 53548 (August 8, 2023) (SR-Cboe-2023-036)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Allow Certain Flexible Exchange Equity Options To Be Cash
Settled).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change that, for FLEX ETF
Options, at least one of exercise style, expiration date, and exercise
price must differ from options in the non-FLEX market will provide
clarity and eliminate confusion regarding permissible terms of FLEX ETF
Options, including the proposed cash-settled FLEX ETF Options.
The Exchange believes that the data provided by the Exchange
supports the supposition that permitting cash settlement as a FLEX term
for the 48 underlying ETFs that would currently qualify to have cash
settlement as a contract term would broaden the base of investors that
use FLEX Equity Options to manage their trading and investment risk,
including investors that currently trade in the OTC market for
customized options, where settlement restrictions do not apply.
The Exchange believes that the proposal to permit cash settlement
for certain FLEX ETF options would remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market because the proposed rule
change would provide members and member organizations with enhanced
methods to manage risk by receiving cash if they choose to do so
instead of the underlying security. In addition, this proposal would
promote just and equitable principles of trade and protect investors
and the general public because cash settlement would provide investors
with an additional tool to manage their risk. Further, the Exchange
notes that another exchange has previously received approval that
allows for the trading of cash-settled options, and, specifically,
cash-settled FLEX ETF Options in an identical manner as the Exchange
proposes to list them pursuant to this rule filing.\66\ The proposed
rule change therefore should not raise issues for the Commission that
it has not previously addressed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\66\ See supra note 39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change to permit cash settlement as a contract
term for options on up to 50 ETFs is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade in that the availability of cash
settlement as a contract term would give market participants an
alternative to trading similar products in the OTC market. By trading a
product in an exchange-traded environment (that is currently traded in
the OTC market), the Exchange would be able to compete more effectively
with the OTC market. The Exchange believes the proposed
[[Page 86018]]
rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices in that it would lead to the migration of options currently
trading in the OTC market to trading on the Exchange. Also, any
migration to the Exchange from the OTC market would result in increased
market transparency. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is designed to remove impediments to and to perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest in that it
should create greater trading and hedging opportunities and
flexibility. The proposed rule change should also result in enhanced
efficiency in initiating and closing out positions and heightened
contra-party creditworthiness due to the role of OCC as issuer and
guarantor of the proposed cash-settled options. Further, the proposed
rule change would result in increased competition by permitting the
Exchange to offer products that are currently available for trading
only in the OTC market and are approved to trade on another options
exchange.
The Exchange believes that establishing position limits for cash-
settled FLEX ETF Options to be the same as physically settled options
on the same underlying security, and aggregating positions in cash-
settled FLEX ETF Options with physically settled options on the same
underlying security for purposes of calculating position limits is
reasonable and consistent with the Act. By establishing the same
position limits for cash-settled FLEX ETF Options as for physically
settled options on the same underlying security and, importantly,
aggregating such positions, the Exchange believes that the position
limit requirements for cash-settled FLEX ETF Options should help to
ensure that the trading of cash-settled FLEX ETF Options would not
increase the potential for manipulation or market disruption and could
help to minimize such incentives. For the same reasons, the Exchange
believes the proposed exercise limits are reasonable and consistent
with the Act.
Finally, the Exchange represents that it has an adequate
surveillance program in place to detect manipulative trading in cash-
settled FLEX ETF Options and the underlying ETFs. Regarding the
proposed cash settlement, the Exchange would use the same surveillance
procedures currently utilized for the Exchange's other FLEX Options.
For surveillance purposes, the Exchange would have access to
information regarding trading activity in the pertinent underlying
ETFs. The Exchange believes that limiting cash settlement to no more
than 50 underlying ETFs (currently, 48 ETFs would be eligible to have
cash-settlement as a contract term) would minimize the possibility of
manipulation due to the robust liquidity in both the equities and
options markets.
As a self-regulatory organization, the Exchange recognizes the
importance of surveillance, among other things, to detect and deter
fraudulent and manipulative trading activity as well as other
violations of Exchange rules and the federal securities laws. As
discussed above, Phlx has adequate surveillance procedures in place to
monitor trading in cash-settled FLEX ETF Options and the underlying
securities, including to detect manipulative trading activity in both
the options and the underlying ETF.\67\ The Exchange further notes the
liquidity and active markets in the underlying ETFs, and the high
number of market participants in both the underlying ETFs and existing
options on the ETFs, helps to minimize the possibility of manipulation.
The Exchange further notes that under Section 19(g) of the Act, the
Exchange, as a self-regulatory organization, is required to enforce
compliance by its members and persons associated with its members with
the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange.\68\ The Exchange believes its surveillance, along with the
liquidity criteria and position and exercise limits requirements, are
reasonably designed to mitigate manipulation and market disruption
concerns and will permit it to enforce compliance with the proposed
rules and other Exchange rules in accordance with Section 19(g) of the
Act. The Exchange performs ongoing evaluations of its surveillance
program to ensure its continued effectiveness and will continue to
review its surveillance procedures on an ongoing basis and make any
necessary enhancements and/or modifications that may be needed for the
cash settlement of FLEX ETF Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\67\ Among other things, Phlx's regulatory program includes
cross-market surveillance designed to identify manipulative and
other improper trading, including spoofing, algorithm gaming,
marking the close and open, as well as more general abusive behavior
related to front running, wash sales, and quoting/routing, which may
occur on the Exchange and other markets. Furthermore, the Exchange
stated that it has access to information regarding trading activity
in the pertinent underlying securities as a member of ISG. As it
relates to Reg SHO violations, the Exchange will enforce this
through its Stock-Tied Reg SHO price protections in Options 3,
Section 16(b). Specifically, Options 3, Section 16(b) provides that
when the short sale price test in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO is
triggered for a covered security, NES will not execute a short sale
order in the underlying covered security component of a Complex
Order if the price is equal to or below the current national best
bid. However, NES will execute a short sale order in the underlying
covered security component of a Complex Order if such order is
marked ``short exempt,'' regardless of whether it is at a price that
is equal to or below the current national best bid. If NES cannot
execute the underlying covered security component of a Complex Order
in accordance with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, the Exchange will
cancel back the Complex Order to the entering member organization.
For purposes of this paragraph, the term ``covered security'' shall
have the same meaning as in Rule 201(a)(1) of Regulation SHO. NES
will only execute the underlying covered security component of a
Complex Order if the underlying covered security component is in
accordance with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO.
\68\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange will monitor any effect additional
options series listed under the proposed rule change may have on market
fragmentation and the capacity of the Exchange's automated systems. The
Exchange will take prompt action, including timely communication with
the Commission and with other self-regulatory organizations responsible
for oversight of trading in options, the underlying ETFs, and the ETFs'
component securities, should any unanticipated adverse market effects
develop.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intra-market competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as all member
organizations who wish to trade FLEX Options will be able to trade such
options in the same manner. Additionally, positions in FLEX Options of
all member organizations will be subject to the same position limits,
and such positions will be aggregated in the same manner as described
in proposed Options 8, Section 34(i)(4).
The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed rule change
will impose any burden on inter-market competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The
proposal promotes inter-market competition by providing another
alternative (i.e., exchange markets) to bilateral OTC trading of
options with flexible terms. Exchange markets, in contrast with
bilateral OTC trading, are centralized, transparent, and have the
guarantee of OCC for options traded.
[[Page 86019]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) by order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-Phlx-2024-51 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-Phlx-2024-51. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-Phlx-2024-51 and should be
submitted on or before November 19, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-25052 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P