Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend its Fees Schedule, 84424-84430 [2024-24371]
Download as PDF
84424
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2024–24459 Filed 10–21–24; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2024–24470 Filed 10–21–24; 8:45 am]
Summary of Application: Applicants
request an order to permit certain
business development companies and
closed-end management investment
companies to co-invest in portfolio
companies with each other and with
certain affiliated investment entities.
Applicants: AFA Private Credit Fund;
Alternative Fund Advisors LLC; and
AFA Private Credit LP.
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on April 12, 2024, and amended on
July 23, 2024.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing on any application by
emailing the SEC’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving
the Applicants with a copy of the
request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below,
or personally or by mail, if a physical
address is listed for the relevant
Applicant below. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on November 11, 2024, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
emailing the Commission’s Secretary at
SecretarysOffice@sec.gov.
For Applicants’ representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to
Applicants’ first amended and restated
application, dated July 23, 2024, which
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file number
at the top of this document, or for an
Applicant using the Company name
search field, on the SEC’s EDGAR
system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may
be searched at, at https://www.sec.gov/
edgar/searchedgar/legacy/
companysearch.html. You may also call
the SEC’s Public Reference Room at
(202) 551–8090.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Chris Chase, Senior Counsel, or Lisa
Reid Ragen, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–
6825 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:45 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–101380; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2024–037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend Rule 5820 To Codify the
Standards of Review That Govern
Appeals Before the Nasdaq Listing and
Hearing Review Council and Calls for
Review by the Nasdaq Listing and
Hearing Review Council
October 17, 2024.
On July 3, 2024, The Nasdaq Stock
Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend Rule 5820 to codify
the standards of review that govern
appeals before the Nasdaq Listing and
Hearing Review Council and calls for
review by the Nasdaq Listing and
Hearing Review Council. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 23,
2024.3 On August 30, 2024, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.5
On October 15, 2024, the Exchange
withdrew the proposed rule change
(SR–NASDAQ–2024–037).
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100544
(July 17, 2024), 89 FR 59782 (‘‘Notice’’). Comments
on the proposed rule change are available at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2024037/srnasdaq2024037.htm.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100879
(August 30, 2024), 89 FR 72501 (September 5,
2024). The Commission designated October 21,
2024, as the date by which the Commission shall
approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change.
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–101367; File No. SR–
CBOE–2024–044]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend its Fees
Schedule
October 16, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
1, 2024, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend
its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
22OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
GTH Monthly customer SPX and
VIX options volume
100,000+ contracts .......................
Subsidy
50,000
To become a designated GTH
executing agent, a TPH must submit a
form to the Exchange no later than 3:00
p.m. on the second to last business day
1. Purpose
of a calendar month to be designated an
The Exchange proposes to amend its
GTH executing agent under the
Fees Schedule, effective October 1,
program, and thus eligible for the
2024.
subsidy, beginning the following
calendar month. The current criteria
XSP Fees
states that a TPH must include on or
The Exchange first proposes to amend with the form information
certain fees related to transactions in
demonstrating it maintains an GTH
Mini-SPX Index (‘‘XSP’’) options.
executing agent operation: (1) physically
Specifically, the proposed rule changes
staffed throughout each entire GTH
amends and adopts certain fees for XSP
trading session and (2) willing to accept
in the ‘‘Rate Table for All Products
and execute orders on behalf of
Excluding Underlying Symbol List A’’,
customers. The designation will be
as follows:
effective the first business day of the
• Amends fee code XC, appended to
following calendar month, subject to the
all Customer (capacity ‘‘C’’) orders in
Exchange’s confirmation the TPH’s GTH
XSP that are for less than 10 contracts
executing agent operations satisfies
and provides a rebate of $0.13 per
these two conditions and will remain in
contract, to provide a rebate of $0.30 per effect until the Exchange receives an
contract.
email from the TPH terminating its
• Amends fee code MY, appended to
designation or the Exchange determines
all Market-Maker (capacity ‘‘M’’) in XSP the TPH’s GTH executing agent
contra to non-customers that remove
operation no longer satisfies these two
liquidity and that are executed
conditions.
electronically and assesses a fee of $0.14
The Exchange proposes to amend the
per contract, to assess a fee of $0.30 per
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program
contract.
to include Professional Customers (i.e.,
capacity ‘‘U’’) in the program, so that a
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program
designated GTH executing agent
Next, the Exchange proposes to
receives the monthly subsidy amount
amend the Global Trading Hours
that corresponds to the number of
(‘‘GTH’’) Executing Agent Subsidy
contracts executed on behalf of
Program, set forth in the Fees Schedule.
customers (including professional,
The GTH Executing Agent Subsidy
public and broker-dealer customers)
Program offers a monthly subsidy to
during GTH in a calendar month per the
Trading Permit Holders (‘‘TPHs’’) with
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program
3
executing agent operations during the
table.
GTH trading session. Pursuant to the
The proposed changes are designed to
current GTH Executing Agent Subsidy
continue to encourage designated GTH
Program, a designated GTH executing
executing agents to increase their order
agent receives the monthly subsidy
flow executed as agent (on behalf of
amount that corresponds to the number
customers, including professional
of contracts executed on behalf of
customers) in SPX and VIX options that
customers (including public and broker- trade during GTH, to meet the volume
dealer customers) during GTH in a
thresholds and receive the
calendar month per the GTH Executing
corresponding subsidies. The Exchange
Agent Subsidy Program table, as shown
notes that incentivizing TPHs to
in the table below. Qualifying customer
conduct executing agent operations
volume is limited to SPX and VIX
willing to accept orders from all
options.
customers, including professional
customers, during GTH is intended to
GTH Monthly customer SPX and
Subsidy
increase customer accessibility to the
VIX options volume
GTH trading session. The Exchange
0–19,999 contracts .......................
$0.00 believes that increased order flow
20,000–99,999 contracts ..............
15,000 through designated GTH executing
agents would allow the Exchange to
3 Under current rules, an executing agent
grow participation during GTH, which
operation is one that accepts orders from customers
may benefit all market participants, as
(who may be public or broker-dealer customers) and
additional liquidity to the Exchange
submits the orders for execution (either directly to
during GTH would create more trading
the Exchange or through another TPH).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
84425
opportunities during GTH, and in turn
attract market participants to submit
additional order flow during GTH.
Flex Surcharge Fee
The Exchange also proposes to adopt
the FLEX Surcharge fee for XND
(Nasdaq 100 Micro Index Options) FLEX
Options orders. Currently, the Exchange
assesses a FLEX Surcharge Fee of $0.10per-contract credit for DJX, MRUT,
MXEA, MXEF, MXACW, MXUSA,
MXWLD, NDX, NDXP and XSP FLEX
Options orders (all capacity codes)
executed electronically (except for Cboe
Compression Service (‘‘CCS’’) and FLEX
Micro transactions). The FLEX
Surcharge Fee is only charged up to the
first 2,500 contracts per trade ($250 per
trade). The Exchange proposes to amend
its Fees Schedule, to assess the FLEX
Surcharge Fee to XND. The FLEX
Surcharge Fee assists the Exchange in
recouping the cost of developing and
maintaining the FLEX system.
RTH XSP LMM Incentive Program
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
amend its Regular Trading Hours
(‘‘RTH’’) XSP Lead Market-Maker
(‘‘LMM’’) Incentive Program (the
‘‘Program’’). By way of background, the
Exchange offers several LMM Incentive
Programs which provide a rebate to
TPHs with LMM appointments to the
respective incentive program that meet
certain quoting standards in the
applicable series in a month. The
Exchange notes that meeting or
exceeding the quoting standards in each
of the LMM Incentive Program products
to receive the applicable is optional for
an LMM appointed to a program.
Particularly, an LMM appointed to an
incentive program is eligible to receive
the corresponding rebate if it satisfies
the applicable quoting standards, which
the Exchange believes encourages
appointed LMMs to provide liquidity in
the applicable class and trading session
(i.e., RTH or GTH). The Exchange may
consider other exceptions to the
programs’ quoting standards based on
demonstrated legal or regulatory
requirements or other mitigating
circumstances. In calculating whether
an LMM appointed to an incentive
program meets the applicable program’s
quoting standards each month, the
Exchange excludes from the calculation
in that month the business day in which
the LMM missed meeting or exceeding
the quoting standards in the highest
number of the applicable series.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
current Program. Currently, the Program
provides that, if an LMM appointed to
the Program provides continuous
electronic quotes during RTH that meet
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
84426
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
or exceed the basic quoting standards
(below) in at least 95% of the series
93% of the time in a given month, the
LMM will receive (i) a payment for that
month in the amount of $40,000 (or pro-
rated amount if an appointment begins
after the first trading day of the month
or ends prior to the last trading day of
the month) and (ii) a rebate of $0.09 per
XSP contract that is executed in RTH in
Market-Maker capacity and adds
liquidity electronically contra to noncustomer capacity.
WIDTH
Moneyness *
Expiring option
VIX Value at Prior Close ≤30:
[≤3% ITM) ...............................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ...............................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ..........................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ...............................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..................................
[>1% OTM] .............................................
VIX Value at Prior Close >30:
[>3% ITM) ...............................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ...............................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ..........................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ...............................
[ATM to 1%OTM) ....................................
[>1% OTM] .............................................
1 day
2 days to 5 days
6 days to 14 days
15 days to 35 days
$0.20
0.10
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
$0.25
0.15
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.02
$0.25
0.15
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.02
$0.50
0.25
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.02
$1.00
0.75
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.25
0.15
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.20
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.20
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.55
0.30
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.03
1.05
0.80
0.11
0.09
0.07
0.05
* Moneyness is calculated as 1 ¥ strike/index for calls, strike/index ¥1 for puts. Negative numbers are Out of the Money (‘‘OTM’’) and positive
values are In the Money (‘‘ITM’’). A Moneyness value of zero for either calls or puts is considered At the Money (‘‘ATM’’). For example, if the
index is at 400, the 396 call = 1 - 396/400 = 0.01 = 1% ITM, whereas the 396 put = 396/400 ¥1 = - 0.01 = 1% OTM.
Moneyness
Size (0 to 35 days to expiry)
[>3% ITM) ....................................................................................................................................................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ....................................................................................................................................................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ...............................................................................................................................................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ....................................................................................................................................................
[ATM to 1% OTM) .......................................................................................................................................................
[>1% OTM] ..................................................................................................................................................................
The Exchange proposes to restructure
the Program by adopting two sets of
quoting standards for XSP options, a set
of basic quoting standards and a set of
advanced quoting standards. First, the
Exchange proposes to adopt the basic
5
10
15
20
20
20
quoting standards (below) under the
Program.
WIDTH
Moneyness
Expiring option
VIX Value at Prior Close ≤30:
[≤3% ITM) ...............................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ...............................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ..........................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ...............................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..................................
[>1% OTM] .............................................
VIX Value at Prior Close >30:
[>3% ITM) ...............................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ...............................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ..........................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ...............................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..................................
[>1% OTM] .............................................
1 day
2 days to 5 days
6 days to 14 days
15 days to 35 days
$0.40
0.30
0.12
0.08
0.05
0.03
$0.40
0.30
0.12
0.08
0.05
0.04
$0.40
0.30
0.15
0.10
0.06
0.05
$0.40
0.30
0.20
0.12
0.06
0.05
$0.75
0.50
0.30
0.18
0.12
0.08
0.50
0.30
0.20
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.50
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.06
0.05
0.50
0.30
0.20
0.12
0.07
0.05
0.80
0.50
0.25
0.15
0.09
0.06
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.20
0.12
0.10
6 days to 14 days
15 days to 35 days
5
10
15
20
20
20
5
10
15
20
20
20
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SIZE
Expiring option
[>3% ITM) ......................................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ......................................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) .................................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ......................................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..........................................
[>1% OTM] .....................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
1 day
5
5
10
20
20
20
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
2 days to 5 days
5
5
10
20
20
20
Sfmt 4703
5
5
10
20
20
20
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
84427
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
As proposed, under the Program, if an
appointed LMM provides continuous
electronic quotes during RTH that meet
or exceed the basic quoting standards in
at least 90% the series 90% of the time
in a given month, the LMM will receive
$15,000 (or pro-rated amount if an
appointment begins after the first
trading day of the month or ends prior
to the last trading day of the month). In
addition, the proposed rule change
adopts a performance payment under
the Program, which provides that, in
addition to the above rebate, the LMM
with the highest performance in
satisfying the above basic quoting
standards in a month will receive a
performance payment of $10,000 for
that month. In order to be eligible to
receive the performance payment in a
month, an LMM must meet or exceed
the above quoting standards in that
month. Highest performance is
measured as the cumulative sum of
series in which an LMM meets or
exceeds the basic quoting requirements
by the total series each day (excluding
the day in which an LMM missed
meeting or exceeding the basic quoting
standard in the highest number of
series).
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
the additional credit of $0.03 per
contract applied to all XSP contracts
executed in a Market-Maker capacity
which add liquidity electronically
contra to non-customer capacity,
currently offered to an LMM appointed
to the Program which provides
continuous electronic quotes during
RTH that meet or exceed the XSP
heightened quoting standards.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Program to adopt advanced quoting
standards (provided below). As
proposed, if an LMM appointed to the
Program provides continuous electronic
quotes during RTH that meet or exceed
the proposed advanced quoting
standards (below) in at least 85% of the
series 85% of the time in a given month,
the LMM will receive a payment for that
month in the amount of $20,000 (or prorated amount if an appointment begins
after the first trading day of the month
or ends prior to the last trading day of
the month).
WIDTH
Moneyness
Expiring option
VIX Value at Prior Close ≤30:
[>3% ITM) ...............................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ...............................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ..........................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ...............................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..................................
[>1% OTM] .............................................
VIX Value at Prior Close >30:
[>3% ITM) ...............................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ...............................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) ..........................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ...............................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..................................
[≤1% OTM] ..............................................
1 day
2 days to 5 days
6 days to 14 days
15 days to 35 days
$0.30
0.12
0.10
0.06
0.03
0.02
$0.25
0.15
0.10
0.06
0.03
0.03
$0.30
0.20
0.15
0.08
0.05
0.04
$0.40
0.25
0.16
0.10
0.06
0.05
$0.75
0.50
0.25
0.15
0.10
0.06
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.08
0.05
0.03
0.40
0.25
0.20
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.50
0.25
0.20
0.12
0.07
0.05
0.70
0.30
0.25
0.15
0.09
0.06
1.00
0.75
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.07
6 days to 14 days
15 days to 35 days
5
10
15
20
20
20
5
10
15
20
20
20
SIZE
Expiring option
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
[>3% ITM) ......................................................
[3% ITM to 2% ITM) ......................................
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM) .................................
[0.25% ITM to ATM) ......................................
[ATM to 1% OTM) ..........................................
[>1% OTM] .....................................................
The Exchange believes the proposed
basic and advanced quoting
requirements for XSP options under the
Program are designed to continue to
encourage LMMs appointed to the
program to provide significant liquidity
in XSP options during RTH, which, in
turn, would provide greater trading
opportunities, added market
transparency and enhanced price
discovery for all market participants in
XSP. Further, by providing a set of
advanced quoting standards that
provide for tighter width standards, the
proposed rule change offers LMMs
appointed to the Program a more
challenging opportunity, thus further
incentive, to strive to meet the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
1 day
5
5
10
20
20
20
2 days to 5 days
5
5
10
20
20
20
5
5
10
20
20
20
heightened quoting standards in order
to receive the additional rebate.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.4 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 5 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
4 15
5 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 6 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
6 Id.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
84428
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,7 which
requires that Exchange rules provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its
TPHs and other persons using its
facilities.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee changes for certain
Customer and Market-Maker orders in
XSP are reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange
believes that it is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to provide a
rebate of $0.30 per contract for all
Customer orders in XSP that are for less
than 10 contracts, as such rebate is
designed to incentivize Customer
volume in XSP on the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that incentivizing
more Customer orders in XSP will
create more trading opportunities,
which, in turn attracts Market-Makers.
A resulting increase in Market-Maker
activity facilitates tighter spreads, which
may lead to additional increase of order
flow in XSP from other market
participants, further contributing to a
deeper, more liquid market to the
benefit of all market participants by
creating a more robust and wellbalanced market ecosystem.
Further, the Exchange believes the
proposed change to the fee for MarketMaker orders in XSP contra to noncustomers that remove liquidity and
that are executed electronically is
reasonable. The proposed fee, in
general, aligns with current fees for
other types of orders in XSP, namely
Non-Customer, Non-Market Maker XSP
orders contra to a customer or contra to
a non-customer that add liquidity and
are executed electronically (which yield
fee code XF). The Exchange believes
that the changes are reasonable and that
the fee, even as amended, will continue
to incentivize TPHs to send additional
Market-Maker orders to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees for certain Customer and
Market-Maker orders in XSP are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed
fees will apply automatically and
uniformly to all applicable Customer
and Market-Maker orders in XSP which
yield fee codes XC and MY,
respectively.
Additionally, the Exchange believes
that the proposed amendment to the
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program,
to include Professional Customers (i.e.,
capacity ‘‘U’’) in the program, so that a
designated GTH executing agent may
receive specified subsidy amounts that
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
correspond to the number of contracts
executed on behalf of customers
(including professional, public and
broker-dealer customers) during GTH in
a calendar month, is reasonable. The
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program
is overall designed to encourage
designated GTH executing agents to
increase their customer order flow in
SPX and VIX options traded during
GTH. The Exchange believes that adding
professional customer capacity orders to
the program will encourage increased
order flow, which would allow the
Exchange to grow participation in the
GTH trading session to the benefit of all
market participants that trade during
GTH, by providing greater trading
opportunities as a result of increased
liquidity, thereby attracting additional
order flow from market participants
during GTH.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule changes related to the
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program
are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory. In particular, the
Exchange believes the proposed changes
are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because all TPHs that
conduct this type of operation during
GTH will continue to have the
opportunity to become a designated
GTH executing agent and to execute
relevant orders on behalf of customers,
including professional customers, and
thus be eligible for the monthly subsidy
commensurate with applicable customer
volumes. As noted above, the proposed
changes reflect the growth of the GTH
trading session and are designed to
continue to encourage designated GTH
executing agents to increase their order
flow executed as agent in SPX and VIX
symbols that trade during GTH, to meet
the volume thresholds and receive
corresponding subsidies. TPHs that
conduct executing agent operations
provide benefits to investors during
GTH, including increased customer
accessibility, including for professional
customers, to the GTH trading session
and increased order flow.
The Exchange believes assessing a
FLEX Surcharge Fee of $0.10 per
contract for all XND orders executed
electronically on FLEX and capping it at
$250 (i.e., first 2,500 contracts per trade)
is reasonable because it is the same
amount currently charged to other index
products for the same transactions.8 The
proposed Surcharge is also equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because
the amount will be assessed to all
8 See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Rate Table—
All Products Excluding Underlying Symbol List A,
FLEX Surcharge Fee.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
market participants to whom the FLEX
Surcharge applies.
The Exchange believes the amended
XSP RTH LMM Incentive Program, as
proposed, is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory. The
Exchange believe the series and time
requirement for the basic quoting
standards (which are less than current
Program requirements), as well as the
basic quoting standards themselves
(which are in general wider in quote
size and quote width than current
Program standards), are reasonable. As
compared to the current Program, such
changes are reasonably designed to
slightly ease the difficulty in meeting
the heightened quoting standards
offered under the Program (for which an
appointed LMM receives the respective
rebates), which, in turn, provides
increased incentive for LMMs appointed
to these programs to provide significant
liquidity in XSP options. Such liquidity
benefits all market participants by
providing more trading opportunities,
tighter spreads, and added market
transparency and price discovery, and
signals to other market participants to
direct their order flow to those markets,
thereby contributing to robust levels of
liquidity.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rebate offered under the
Program to an LMM appointed to the
program for meeting the basic quoting
standards in a given month ($15,000)
remains reasonably designed to
incentivize an appointed LMM to meet
the applicable quoting standards for
XSP options, thereby providing liquid
and active markets, which facilitates
tighter spreads, increased trading
opportunities, and overall enhanced
market quality to the benefit of all
market participants. The Exchange
further believes that the proposed rule
change is reasonable because it is
comparable to and within the range of
the rebates offered by other LMM
Incentive Programs. For example, the
GTH1 and GTH2 XSP LMM Programs
each currently offer $15,000 to
appointed LMMs for XSP options if the
heightened quoting standards are met in
a given month.
Further, the Exchange believes the
proposed performance payment of
$10,000 provided to the LMM with the
highest performance in satisfying the
relevant heightened quoting standards
for the Program is reasonable and
equitable as the LMM Incentive
Programs for MXEA and MXEF,
MXACW, MXUSA, and MXWLD
options offers a similar performance
payment. All appointed LMMs are
eligible for the performance payment,
which is designed to incentivize LMMs
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
to provide liquid and active markets in
XSP options to encourage product
growth.
The Exchange also believes the
elimination of the additional per
contract credit incentive is reasonable,
as the Exchange is not required to
maintain the additional per contract
incentive and now wishes to eliminate
it from the Program.
Additionally, the Exchange believes
the proposed advanced quoting
standards are reasonable. As noted
above, by providing a set of advanced
quoting standards that provide for
tighter width standards, the proposed
rule change offers LMMs appointed to
the Program a more challenging
opportunity, thus further incentive, to
strive to meet the heightened quoting
standards in order to receive the
additional rebate.
In general, the proposed Program is a
reasonable financial incentive program
because the proposed heightened
quoting standards and rebate amounts
for meeting the heightened quoting
standards in XSP series are reasonably
designed to incentivize LMMs
appointed to the Program to meet the
proposed heightened quoting standards
during RTH for XSP, thereby providing
liquid and active markets, which
facilitates tighter spreads, increased
trading opportunities, and overall
enhanced market quality to the benefit
of all market participants.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed heightened quoting standards
are reasonable because they are similar
to the detail and format of the quoting
standards currently in place for LMM
Incentive Programs for other proprietary
Exchange products that trade during
RTH.9 The Exchange also believes that
proposed heightened quoting
requirements are reasonably tailored to
reflect market characteristics of XSP.
For example, the Exchange believes the
generally smaller widths appropriately
reflect the lower-priced and smaller
notional sized XSP product (XSP
options are 1/10th the size of SPX
options). The Exchange believes
continuing to utilize moneyness as a
quoting standard is reasonable, given
the program objectives to achieve tight
liquidity in a market where options
premiums change quickly.
Finally, the Exchange believes it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to offer the financial
incentive to LMMs appointed to the
9 See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, ‘‘RTH SPESG
LMM Incentive Program’’, ‘‘MRUT LMM Incentive
Program’’, ‘‘MXACW LMM Incentive Program’’,
‘‘MXUSA LMM Incentive Program’’, ‘‘MXWLD
Incentive Program’’, ‘‘NANOS LMM Incentive
Program’’, and ‘‘MSCI LMM Incentive Program.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
Program because it will benefit all
market participants trading in XSP
during RTH by encouraging the
appointed LMMs to satisfy the basic and
advanced quoting standards, which
incentivizes continuous increased
liquidity and thereby may provide more
trading opportunities and tighter
spreads. Indeed, the Exchange notes that
these LMMs serve a crucial role in
providing quotes and the opportunity
for market participants to trade XSP,
which can lead to increased volume,
providing for robust markets. The
Exchange ultimately proposes to offer
the Program to sufficiently incentivize
the appointed LMMs to provide key
liquidity and active markets in XSP
options to encourage liquidity, thereby
protecting investors and the public
interest. The Exchange also notes that
an LMM appointed to the Program may
undertake added costs each month to
satisfy that heightened quoting
standards (e.g., having to purchase
additional logical connectivity). The
Exchange believes the Program is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because similar
programs currently exist for LMMs
appointed to programs in other
proprietary products,10 including for
XSP during the GTH sessions, and the
Program will equally apply to any TPH
that is appointed as an LMM to the
Program. Additionally, if an appointed
LMM does not satisfy the heightened
quoting standard in XSP for any given
month, then it simply will not receive
the offered payments or rebates for that
month.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change related to XSP fee
codes will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed fees will apply automatically
and uniformly to all applicable
Customer and Market-Maker orders in
XSP which yield fee codes XC and MY,
respectively.
10 See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, ‘‘MRUT LMM
Incentive Program’’, ‘‘MSCI LMM Incentive
Program’’, ‘‘MXACW LMM Incentive Program’’,
‘‘MXUSA LMM Incentive Program’’, ‘‘MXWLD
Incentive Program’’, ‘‘NANOS LMM Incentive
Program’’, ‘‘GTH VIX/VIXW LMM Incentive
Program’’, ‘‘GTH1/GTH2 SPX/SPXW LMM
Incentive Programs’’, ‘‘GTH1/GTH2 XSP LMM
Incentive Programs’’, and ‘‘RTH SPESG LMM
Incentive Program.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
84429
In regard to the proposed changes to
the GTH Executing Agent Subsidy
Program, all TPHs that conduct
executing agent operations willing to
accept orders from all customers
(including professional customers) will
continue to have an opportunity to be
eligible for the GTH Executing Agent
Subsidy program. Also, such TPHs that
conduct this type of operation may
provide benefits to investors during
GTH, including increased customer
accessibility to, and liquidity and
trading opportunities during, the GTH
trading session. The proposed changes
are designed to continue to encourage
designated GTH executing agents to
increase their order flow executed as
agent in SPX and VIX symbols that trade
during GTH, to receive specified
subsidies.
In regard to the proposed FLEX
Surcharge rule changes, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change
will not impose any burden on
intramarket competition because the
proposed rule changes apply to all
market participants that trade XND
FLEX Options.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intramarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the amendments to RTH XSP
LMM Program will apply uniformly to
any LMM appointment to the programs.
To the extent LMMs appointed to these
LMM Incentive Programs receive a
benefit that other market participants do
not, as stated, these LMMs in their role
as Market-Makers on the Exchange have
different obligations and are held to
different standards. An LMM appointed
to an incentive program may also
undertake added costs each month to
satisfy that heightened quoting
standards (e.g., having to purchase
additional logical connectivity).
The Exchange also notes that the
proposed changes are designed to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange,
wherein greater liquidity benefits all
market participants by providing more
trading opportunities, tighter spreads,
and added market transparency and
price discovery, and signals to other
market participants to direct their order
flow to those markets, thereby
contributing to robust levels of liquidity.
As a result, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change furthers the
Commission’s goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which
promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
84430
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.’’ 11
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed fees and programs
apply to Exchange proprietary products,
which are traded exclusively on the
Exchange. To the extent that the
proposed changes make Cboe Options a
more attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to
become Cboe Options market
participants.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
it operates in a highly competitive
market. TPHs have numerous
alternative venues that they may
participate on and direct their order
flow, including 17 other options
exchanges, as well as off-exchange
venues, where competitive products are
available for trading. Based on publicly
available information, no single options
exchange has more than 16% of the
market share.12 Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of option order flow.
Indeed, participants can readily choose
to send their orders to other exchange,
and, additionally off-exchange venues,
if they deem fee levels at those other
venues to be more favorable. Moreover,
the Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 13 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
11 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 70
FR 37495, 37498–99 (June 29, 2005) (S7–10–04)
(Final Rule).
12 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market
Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (March 29, 2023),
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/
market_statistics/.
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Oct 21, 2024
Jkt 265001
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . ..’’.14 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 15 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 16 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CBOE–2024–044 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
14 NetCoalition
v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca-2006–21)).
15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CBOE–2024–044. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CBOE–2024–044 and should be
submitted on or before November 12,
2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–24371 Filed 10–21–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702;
NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number NC–
20007]
Presidential Declaration Amendment of
a Major Disaster for the State of North
Carolina
Small Business Administration.
Amendment 2.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
SUMMARY:
17 17
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
22OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84424-84430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24371]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-101367; File No. SR-CBOE-2024-044]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
its Fees Schedule
October 16, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 1, 2024, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set
[[Page 84425]]
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule, effective October
1, 2024.
XSP Fees
The Exchange first proposes to amend certain fees related to
transactions in Mini-SPX Index (``XSP'') options. Specifically, the
proposed rule changes amends and adopts certain fees for XSP in the
``Rate Table for All Products Excluding Underlying Symbol List A'', as
follows:
Amends fee code XC, appended to all Customer (capacity
``C'') orders in XSP that are for less than 10 contracts and provides a
rebate of $0.13 per contract, to provide a rebate of $0.30 per
contract.
Amends fee code MY, appended to all Market-Maker (capacity
``M'') in XSP contra to non-customers that remove liquidity and that
are executed electronically and assesses a fee of $0.14 per contract,
to assess a fee of $0.30 per contract.
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program
Next, the Exchange proposes to amend the Global Trading Hours
(``GTH'') Executing Agent Subsidy Program, set forth in the Fees
Schedule. The GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program offers a monthly
subsidy to Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'') with executing agent
operations \3\ during the GTH trading session. Pursuant to the current
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program, a designated GTH executing agent
receives the monthly subsidy amount that corresponds to the number of
contracts executed on behalf of customers (including public and broker-
dealer customers) during GTH in a calendar month per the GTH Executing
Agent Subsidy Program table, as shown in the table below. Qualifying
customer volume is limited to SPX and VIX options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under current rules, an executing agent operation is one
that accepts orders from customers (who may be public or broker-
dealer customers) and submits the orders for execution (either
directly to the Exchange or through another TPH).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GTH Monthly customer SPX and VIX options volume Subsidy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0-19,999 contracts........................................... $0.00
20,000-99,999 contracts...................................... 15,000
100,000+ contracts........................................... 50,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To become a designated GTH executing agent, a TPH must submit a
form to the Exchange no later than 3:00 p.m. on the second to last
business day of a calendar month to be designated an GTH executing
agent under the program, and thus eligible for the subsidy, beginning
the following calendar month. The current criteria states that a TPH
must include on or with the form information demonstrating it maintains
an GTH executing agent operation: (1) physically staffed throughout
each entire GTH trading session and (2) willing to accept and execute
orders on behalf of customers. The designation will be effective the
first business day of the following calendar month, subject to the
Exchange's confirmation the TPH's GTH executing agent operations
satisfies these two conditions and will remain in effect until the
Exchange receives an email from the TPH terminating its designation or
the Exchange determines the TPH's GTH executing agent operation no
longer satisfies these two conditions.
The Exchange proposes to amend the GTH Executing Agent Subsidy
Program to include Professional Customers (i.e., capacity ``U'') in the
program, so that a designated GTH executing agent receives the monthly
subsidy amount that corresponds to the number of contracts executed on
behalf of customers (including professional, public and broker-dealer
customers) during GTH in a calendar month per the GTH Executing Agent
Subsidy Program table.
The proposed changes are designed to continue to encourage
designated GTH executing agents to increase their order flow executed
as agent (on behalf of customers, including professional customers) in
SPX and VIX options that trade during GTH, to meet the volume
thresholds and receive the corresponding subsidies. The Exchange notes
that incentivizing TPHs to conduct executing agent operations willing
to accept orders from all customers, including professional customers,
during GTH is intended to increase customer accessibility to the GTH
trading session. The Exchange believes that increased order flow
through designated GTH executing agents would allow the Exchange to
grow participation during GTH, which may benefit all market
participants, as additional liquidity to the Exchange during GTH would
create more trading opportunities during GTH, and in turn attract
market participants to submit additional order flow during GTH.
Flex Surcharge Fee
The Exchange also proposes to adopt the FLEX Surcharge fee for XND
(Nasdaq 100 Micro Index Options) FLEX Options orders. Currently, the
Exchange assesses a FLEX Surcharge Fee of $0.10-per-contract credit for
DJX, MRUT, MXEA, MXEF, MXACW, MXUSA, MXWLD, NDX, NDXP and XSP FLEX
Options orders (all capacity codes) executed electronically (except for
Cboe Compression Service (``CCS'') and FLEX Micro transactions). The
FLEX Surcharge Fee is only charged up to the first 2,500 contracts per
trade ($250 per trade). The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees
Schedule, to assess the FLEX Surcharge Fee to XND. The FLEX Surcharge
Fee assists the Exchange in recouping the cost of developing and
maintaining the FLEX system.
RTH XSP LMM Incentive Program
Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend its Regular Trading Hours
(``RTH'') XSP Lead Market-Maker (``LMM'') Incentive Program (the
``Program''). By way of background, the Exchange offers several LMM
Incentive Programs which provide a rebate to TPHs with LMM appointments
to the respective incentive program that meet certain quoting standards
in the applicable series in a month. The Exchange notes that meeting or
exceeding the quoting standards in each of the LMM Incentive Program
products to receive the applicable is optional for an LMM appointed to
a program. Particularly, an LMM appointed to an incentive program is
eligible to receive the corresponding rebate if it satisfies the
applicable quoting standards, which the Exchange believes encourages
appointed LMMs to provide liquidity in the applicable class and trading
session (i.e., RTH or GTH). The Exchange may consider other exceptions
to the programs' quoting standards based on demonstrated legal or
regulatory requirements or other mitigating circumstances. In
calculating whether an LMM appointed to an incentive program meets the
applicable program's quoting standards each month, the Exchange
excludes from the calculation in that month the business day in which
the LMM missed meeting or exceeding the quoting standards in the
highest number of the applicable series.
The Exchange proposes to amend the current Program. Currently, the
Program provides that, if an LMM appointed to the Program provides
continuous electronic quotes during RTH that meet
[[Page 84426]]
or exceed the basic quoting standards (below) in at least 95% of the
series 93% of the time in a given month, the LMM will receive (i) a
payment for that month in the amount of $40,000 (or pro-rated amount if
an appointment begins after the first trading day of the month or ends
prior to the last trading day of the month) and (ii) a rebate of $0.09
per XSP contract that is executed in RTH in Market-Maker capacity and
adds liquidity electronically contra to non-customer capacity.
Width
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moneyness * Expiring option 1 day 2 days to 5 days 6 days to 14 days 15 days to 35 days
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VIX Value at Prior Close <=30:
[>3% ITM)................................................. $0.20 $0.25 $0.25 $0.50 $1.00
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)........................................ 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.75
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)..................................... 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.10
[0.25% ITM to ATM)........................................ 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.08
[ATM to 1% OTM)........................................... 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.06
[>1% OTM]................................................. 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
VIX Value at Prior Close >30:
[>3% ITM)................................................. 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.55 1.05
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)........................................ 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.80
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)..................................... 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.11
[0.25% ITM to ATM)........................................ 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.09
[ATM to 1%OTM)............................................ 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.07
[>1% OTM]................................................. 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Moneyness is calculated as 1 - strike/index for calls, strike/index -1 for puts. Negative numbers are Out of the Money (``OTM'') and positive values
are In the Money (``ITM''). A Moneyness value of zero for either calls or puts is considered At the Money (``ATM''). For example, if the index is at
400, the 396 call = 1 - 396/400 = 0.01 = 1% ITM, whereas the 396 put = 396/400 -1 = - 0.01 = 1% OTM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size (0 to 35 days to
Moneyness expiry)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[>3% ITM).................................. 5
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)......................... 10
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)...................... 15
[0.25% ITM to ATM)......................... 20
[ATM to 1% OTM)............................ 20
[>1% OTM].................................. 20
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to restructure the Program by adopting two
sets of quoting standards for XSP options, a set of basic quoting
standards and a set of advanced quoting standards. First, the Exchange
proposes to adopt the basic quoting standards (below) under the
Program.
Width
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moneyness Expiring option 1 day 2 days to 5 days 6 days to 14 days 15 days to 35 days
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VIX Value at Prior Close <=30:
[>3% ITM)................................................. $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $0.75
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)........................................ 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.50
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)..................................... 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.20 0.30
[0.25% ITM to ATM)........................................ 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.18
[ATM to 1% OTM)........................................... 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.12
[>1% OTM]................................................. 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.08
VIX Value at Prior Close >30:
[>3% ITM)................................................. 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.80 1.00
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)........................................ 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.50 0.75
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)..................................... 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.50
[0.25% ITM to ATM)........................................ 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.20
[ATM to 1% OTM)........................................... 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12
[>1% OTM]................................................. 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiring option 1 day 2 days to 5 days 6 days to 14 days 15 days to 35 days
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[>3% ITM)..................................................... 5 5 5 5 5
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)............................................ 5 5 5 10 10
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)......................................... 10 10 10 15 15
[0.25% ITM to ATM)............................................ 20 20 20 20 20
[ATM to 1% OTM)............................................... 20 20 20 20 20
[>1% OTM]..................................................... 20 20 20 20 20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 84427]]
As proposed, under the Program, if an appointed LMM provides
continuous electronic quotes during RTH that meet or exceed the basic
quoting standards in at least 90% the series 90% of the time in a given
month, the LMM will receive $15,000 (or pro-rated amount if an
appointment begins after the first trading day of the month or ends
prior to the last trading day of the month). In addition, the proposed
rule change adopts a performance payment under the Program, which
provides that, in addition to the above rebate, the LMM with the
highest performance in satisfying the above basic quoting standards in
a month will receive a performance payment of $10,000 for that month.
In order to be eligible to receive the performance payment in a month,
an LMM must meet or exceed the above quoting standards in that month.
Highest performance is measured as the cumulative sum of series in
which an LMM meets or exceeds the basic quoting requirements by the
total series each day (excluding the day in which an LMM missed meeting
or exceeding the basic quoting standard in the highest number of
series).
The Exchange proposes to eliminate the additional credit of $0.03
per contract applied to all XSP contracts executed in a Market-Maker
capacity which add liquidity electronically contra to non-customer
capacity, currently offered to an LMM appointed to the Program which
provides continuous electronic quotes during RTH that meet or exceed
the XSP heightened quoting standards.
The Exchange proposes to amend the Program to adopt advanced
quoting standards (provided below). As proposed, if an LMM appointed to
the Program provides continuous electronic quotes during RTH that meet
or exceed the proposed advanced quoting standards (below) in at least
85% of the series 85% of the time in a given month, the LMM will
receive a payment for that month in the amount of $20,000 (or pro-rated
amount if an appointment begins after the first trading day of the
month or ends prior to the last trading day of the month).
Width
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moneyness Expiring option 1 day 2 days to 5 days 6 days to 14 days 15 days to 35 days
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VIX Value at Prior Close <=30:
[>3% ITM)................................................. $0.30 $0.25 $0.30 $0.40 $0.75
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)........................................ 0.12 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.50
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)..................................... 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.16 0.25
[0.25% ITM to ATM)........................................ 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.15
[ATM to 1% OTM)........................................... 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.10
[>1% OTM]................................................. 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
VIX Value at Prior Close >30:
[>3% ITM)................................................. 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.70 1.00
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)........................................ 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.75
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)..................................... 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.40
[0.25% ITM to ATM)........................................ 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.20
[ATM to 1% OTM)........................................... 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10
[<=1% OTM]................................................ 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiring option 1 day 2 days to 5 days 6 days to 14 days 15 days to 35 days
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[>3% ITM)..................................................... 5 5 5 5 5
[3% ITM to 2% ITM)............................................ 5 5 5 10 10
[2% ITM to 0.25% ITM)......................................... 10 10 10 15 15
[0.25% ITM to ATM)............................................ 20 20 20 20 20
[ATM to 1% OTM)............................................... 20 20 20 20 20
[>1% OTM]..................................................... 20 20 20 20 20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed basic and advanced quoting
requirements for XSP options under the Program are designed to continue
to encourage LMMs appointed to the program to provide significant
liquidity in XSP options during RTH, which, in turn, would provide
greater trading opportunities, added market transparency and enhanced
price discovery for all market participants in XSP. Further, by
providing a set of advanced quoting standards that provide for tighter
width standards, the proposed rule change offers LMMs appointed to the
Program a more challenging opportunity, thus further incentive, to
strive to meet the heightened quoting standards in order to receive the
additional rebate.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \6\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
[[Page 84428]]
The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its TPHs and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\6\ Id.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed fee changes for certain
Customer and Market-Maker orders in XSP are reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange believes that it is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory to provide a rebate of $0.30 per
contract for all Customer orders in XSP that are for less than 10
contracts, as such rebate is designed to incentivize Customer volume in
XSP on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that incentivizing more
Customer orders in XSP will create more trading opportunities, which,
in turn attracts Market-Makers. A resulting increase in Market-Maker
activity facilitates tighter spreads, which may lead to additional
increase of order flow in XSP from other market participants, further
contributing to a deeper, more liquid market to the benefit of all
market participants by creating a more robust and well-balanced market
ecosystem.
Further, the Exchange believes the proposed change to the fee for
Market-Maker orders in XSP contra to non-customers that remove
liquidity and that are executed electronically is reasonable. The
proposed fee, in general, aligns with current fees for other types of
orders in XSP, namely Non-Customer, Non-Market Maker XSP orders contra
to a customer or contra to a non-customer that add liquidity and are
executed electronically (which yield fee code XF). The Exchange
believes that the changes are reasonable and that the fee, even as
amended, will continue to incentivize TPHs to send additional Market-
Maker orders to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees for certain Customer
and Market-Maker orders in XSP are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed fees will apply automatically and
uniformly to all applicable Customer and Market-Maker orders in XSP
which yield fee codes XC and MY, respectively.
Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to
the GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program, to include Professional
Customers (i.e., capacity ``U'') in the program, so that a designated
GTH executing agent may receive specified subsidy amounts that
correspond to the number of contracts executed on behalf of customers
(including professional, public and broker-dealer customers) during GTH
in a calendar month, is reasonable. The GTH Executing Agent Subsidy
Program is overall designed to encourage designated GTH executing
agents to increase their customer order flow in SPX and VIX options
traded during GTH. The Exchange believes that adding professional
customer capacity orders to the program will encourage increased order
flow, which would allow the Exchange to grow participation in the GTH
trading session to the benefit of all market participants that trade
during GTH, by providing greater trading opportunities as a result of
increased liquidity, thereby attracting additional order flow from
market participants during GTH.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule changes related
to the GTH Executing Agent Subsidy Program are equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory. In particular, the Exchange believes the
proposed changes are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because
all TPHs that conduct this type of operation during GTH will continue
to have the opportunity to become a designated GTH executing agent and
to execute relevant orders on behalf of customers, including
professional customers, and thus be eligible for the monthly subsidy
commensurate with applicable customer volumes. As noted above, the
proposed changes reflect the growth of the GTH trading session and are
designed to continue to encourage designated GTH executing agents to
increase their order flow executed as agent in SPX and VIX symbols that
trade during GTH, to meet the volume thresholds and receive
corresponding subsidies. TPHs that conduct executing agent operations
provide benefits to investors during GTH, including increased customer
accessibility, including for professional customers, to the GTH trading
session and increased order flow.
The Exchange believes assessing a FLEX Surcharge Fee of $0.10 per
contract for all XND orders executed electronically on FLEX and capping
it at $250 (i.e., first 2,500 contracts per trade) is reasonable
because it is the same amount currently charged to other index products
for the same transactions.\8\ The proposed Surcharge is also equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because the amount will be assessed to
all market participants to whom the FLEX Surcharge applies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Rate Table--All Products
Excluding Underlying Symbol List A, FLEX Surcharge Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the amended XSP RTH LMM Incentive Program, as
proposed, is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The
Exchange believe the series and time requirement for the basic quoting
standards (which are less than current Program requirements), as well
as the basic quoting standards themselves (which are in general wider
in quote size and quote width than current Program standards), are
reasonable. As compared to the current Program, such changes are
reasonably designed to slightly ease the difficulty in meeting the
heightened quoting standards offered under the Program (for which an
appointed LMM receives the respective rebates), which, in turn,
provides increased incentive for LMMs appointed to these programs to
provide significant liquidity in XSP options. Such liquidity benefits
all market participants by providing more trading opportunities,
tighter spreads, and added market transparency and price discovery, and
signals to other market participants to direct their order flow to
those markets, thereby contributing to robust levels of liquidity.
The Exchange also believes the proposed rebate offered under the
Program to an LMM appointed to the program for meeting the basic
quoting standards in a given month ($15,000) remains reasonably
designed to incentivize an appointed LMM to meet the applicable quoting
standards for XSP options, thereby providing liquid and active markets,
which facilitates tighter spreads, increased trading opportunities, and
overall enhanced market quality to the benefit of all market
participants. The Exchange further believes that the proposed rule
change is reasonable because it is comparable to and within the range
of the rebates offered by other LMM Incentive Programs. For example,
the GTH1 and GTH2 XSP LMM Programs each currently offer $15,000 to
appointed LMMs for XSP options if the heightened quoting standards are
met in a given month.
Further, the Exchange believes the proposed performance payment of
$10,000 provided to the LMM with the highest performance in satisfying
the relevant heightened quoting standards for the Program is reasonable
and equitable as the LMM Incentive Programs for MXEA and MXEF, MXACW,
MXUSA, and MXWLD options offers a similar performance payment. All
appointed LMMs are eligible for the performance payment, which is
designed to incentivize LMMs
[[Page 84429]]
to provide liquid and active markets in XSP options to encourage
product growth.
The Exchange also believes the elimination of the additional per
contract credit incentive is reasonable, as the Exchange is not
required to maintain the additional per contract incentive and now
wishes to eliminate it from the Program.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed advanced quoting
standards are reasonable. As noted above, by providing a set of
advanced quoting standards that provide for tighter width standards,
the proposed rule change offers LMMs appointed to the Program a more
challenging opportunity, thus further incentive, to strive to meet the
heightened quoting standards in order to receive the additional rebate.
In general, the proposed Program is a reasonable financial
incentive program because the proposed heightened quoting standards and
rebate amounts for meeting the heightened quoting standards in XSP
series are reasonably designed to incentivize LMMs appointed to the
Program to meet the proposed heightened quoting standards during RTH
for XSP, thereby providing liquid and active markets, which facilitates
tighter spreads, increased trading opportunities, and overall enhanced
market quality to the benefit of all market participants.
The Exchange believes that the proposed heightened quoting
standards are reasonable because they are similar to the detail and
format of the quoting standards currently in place for LMM Incentive
Programs for other proprietary Exchange products that trade during
RTH.\9\ The Exchange also believes that proposed heightened quoting
requirements are reasonably tailored to reflect market characteristics
of XSP. For example, the Exchange believes the generally smaller widths
appropriately reflect the lower-priced and smaller notional sized XSP
product (XSP options are 1/10\th\ the size of SPX options). The
Exchange believes continuing to utilize moneyness as a quoting standard
is reasonable, given the program objectives to achieve tight liquidity
in a market where options premiums change quickly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, ``RTH SPESG LMM Incentive
Program'', ``MRUT LMM Incentive Program'', ``MXACW LMM Incentive
Program'', ``MXUSA LMM Incentive Program'', ``MXWLD Incentive
Program'', ``NANOS LMM Incentive Program'', and ``MSCI LMM Incentive
Program.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to offer the financial incentive to LMMs appointed to
the Program because it will benefit all market participants trading in
XSP during RTH by encouraging the appointed LMMs to satisfy the basic
and advanced quoting standards, which incentivizes continuous increased
liquidity and thereby may provide more trading opportunities and
tighter spreads. Indeed, the Exchange notes that these LMMs serve a
crucial role in providing quotes and the opportunity for market
participants to trade XSP, which can lead to increased volume,
providing for robust markets. The Exchange ultimately proposes to offer
the Program to sufficiently incentivize the appointed LMMs to provide
key liquidity and active markets in XSP options to encourage liquidity,
thereby protecting investors and the public interest. The Exchange also
notes that an LMM appointed to the Program may undertake added costs
each month to satisfy that heightened quoting standards (e.g., having
to purchase additional logical connectivity). The Exchange believes the
Program is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because similar
programs currently exist for LMMs appointed to programs in other
proprietary products,\10\ including for XSP during the GTH sessions,
and the Program will equally apply to any TPH that is appointed as an
LMM to the Program. Additionally, if an appointed LMM does not satisfy
the heightened quoting standard in XSP for any given month, then it
simply will not receive the offered payments or rebates for that month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Cboe Options Fees Schedule, ``MRUT LMM Incentive
Program'', ``MSCI LMM Incentive Program'', ``MXACW LMM Incentive
Program'', ``MXUSA LMM Incentive Program'', ``MXWLD Incentive
Program'', ``NANOS LMM Incentive Program'', ``GTH VIX/VIXW LMM
Incentive Program'', ``GTH1/GTH2 SPX/SPXW LMM Incentive Programs'',
``GTH1/GTH2 XSP LMM Incentive Programs'', and ``RTH SPESG LMM
Incentive Program.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change related to XSP fee codes will
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed fees will apply automatically and uniformly to all applicable
Customer and Market-Maker orders in XSP which yield fee codes XC and
MY, respectively.
In regard to the proposed changes to the GTH Executing Agent
Subsidy Program, all TPHs that conduct executing agent operations
willing to accept orders from all customers (including professional
customers) will continue to have an opportunity to be eligible for the
GTH Executing Agent Subsidy program. Also, such TPHs that conduct this
type of operation may provide benefits to investors during GTH,
including increased customer accessibility to, and liquidity and
trading opportunities during, the GTH trading session. The proposed
changes are designed to continue to encourage designated GTH executing
agents to increase their order flow executed as agent in SPX and VIX
symbols that trade during GTH, to receive specified subsidies.
In regard to the proposed FLEX Surcharge rule changes, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on
intramarket competition because the proposed rule changes apply to all
market participants that trade XND FLEX Options.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the
amendments to RTH XSP LMM Program will apply uniformly to any LMM
appointment to the programs. To the extent LMMs appointed to these LMM
Incentive Programs receive a benefit that other market participants do
not, as stated, these LMMs in their role as Market-Makers on the
Exchange have different obligations and are held to different
standards. An LMM appointed to an incentive program may also undertake
added costs each month to satisfy that heightened quoting standards
(e.g., having to purchase additional logical connectivity).
The Exchange also notes that the proposed changes are designed to
attract additional order flow to the Exchange, wherein greater
liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more trading
opportunities, tighter spreads, and added market transparency and price
discovery, and signals to other market participants to direct their
order flow to those markets, thereby contributing to robust levels of
liquidity. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
[[Page 84430]]
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 70 FR 37495,
37498-99 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed fees and programs apply to Exchange proprietary products,
which are traded exclusively on the Exchange. To the extent that the
proposed changes make Cboe Options a more attractive marketplace for
market participants at other exchanges, such market participants are
welcome to become Cboe Options market participants.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market. TPHs have numerous alternative venues that they may
participate on and direct their order flow, including 17 other options
exchanges, as well as off-exchange venues, where competitive products
are available for trading. Based on publicly available information, no
single options exchange has more than 16% of the market share.\12\
Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the
execution of option order flow. Indeed, participants can readily choose
to send their orders to other exchange, and, additionally off-exchange
venues, if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically,
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \13\ The fact
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the
courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C.
Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for
order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S.
national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the
broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide
range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no
exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted'
because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker dealers'. . ..''.\14\
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change
imposes any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Volume Summary,
Month-to-Date (March 29, 2023), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/.
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\14\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \16\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CBOE-2024-044 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CBOE-2024-044. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CBOE-2024-044 and should be
submitted on or before November 12, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-24371 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P