Certain Fiber-Optic Connectors, Adapters, Jump Cables, Patch Cords, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the Investigation, 83701-83702 [2024-23968]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2024 / Notices
argument. This investigation is
terminated.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on October 10,
2024.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 10, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–23912 Filed 10–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1399]
Certain Fiber-Optic Connectors,
Adapters, Jump Cables, Patch Cords,
Products Containing the Same, and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation Based
on Settlement; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 34) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
terminating the two remaining
respondents based on settlement. The
investigation is thus terminated in its
entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Oct 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
On April
26, 2024, the Commission instituted this
investigation based on a complaint, as
supplemented, filed on behalf of US
Conec, Ltd., of Hickory, North Carolina
(‘‘US Conec’’). 89 FR 32459–60 (Apr. 26,
2024). The complaint alleged violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain fiber-optic
connectors, adapters, jump cables, patch
cords, products containing the same,
and components thereof that infringe
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
11,733,466; 11,808,994; 11,906,794;
11,880,075; 11,385,415 and 10,495,823.
Id. at 32459. The complaint also alleged
that a domestic industry exists. Id. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
names as respondents Senko Advance
Co., Ltd. of Yokkaichi City, Japan and
Senko Advanced Components, Inc. of
Hudson, Massachusetts (‘‘the Senko
Respondents’’); Eaton Corp. of Dublin,
Ireland; Tripp Lite Holdings, Inc. of
Woodridge, Illinois; FS.com Inc. of New
Castle, Delaware (‘‘FS.com’’); Infinite
Electronics, Inc. of Irvine, California; Lcom, Inc. of North Andover,
Massachusetts; Sumitomo Electric
Industries, Ltd. of Osaka, Japan,
Sumitomo Electric Lightwave Corp. of
Raleigh, North Carolina, and Sumitomo
Electric U.S.A., Inc. of Torrance,
California (together, ‘‘Sumitomo’’);
EZconn Corp. of New Taipei City,
Taiwan; Flexoptix GmbH of Darmstadt,
Germany; Shenzhen UnitekFiber
Solution Ltd. of Shenzhen, China;
Hubbell Inc. of Shelton, Connecticut;
Hubbell Premise Wiring, Inc. of Shelton,
Connecticut; Shenzhen IH Optics Co.,
Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Rayoptic
Communication Co., Ltd., of Shenzhen,
China; and HuNan Surfiber Technology
Co., Ltd. of Changsha, China. Id. at
32460. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is participating
in this investigation. Id.
The Commission previously
terminated the investigation in part
based on the entry of consent orders
with respect to the following
respondents: FS.com Inc., Order No. 15
(Jun. 25, 2024), unreviewed by Comm’n
Notice (Jul. 24, 2024); Shenzhen IH
Optics Co., Ltd., Order No. 16 (Jun. 26,
2024), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Jul. 24, 2024); Flexoptix GmbH, Order
No. 17 (Jun. 26, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Jul. 24, 2024). The
Commission also previously terminated
the investigation in part based on
settlement with respect to Sumitomo.
Sumitomo, Order No. 21 (Jul. 15, 2024),
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
83701
unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 8,
2024).
The Commission further previously
terminated the investigation in part
based on US Conec’s withdrawal of the
complaint with respect to the following
respondents: Hubbell Inc., Hubbell
Premise Wiring, Inc., EZconn Corp.,
Changzhou Co-Net Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen
UnitekFiber Solution Ltd., Rayoptic
Communication Co., Ltd., HuNan
Surfiber Technology Co., Ltd., Eaton
Corp., Tripp Lite Holdings, Inc., Infinite
Electronics, Inc., and L-Com, LLC. Order
No. 33 (Sept. 3, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Oct. 3, 2024).
On July 9, 2024, US Conec filed a
motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
add three respondents: Protai Photonic
Co., Ltd., Jarllytec Co., Ltd., and
Wave2Wave Solutions Corp. d/b/a
FiberSmart. The ALJ issued Order No.
27 granting the motion to allow US
Conec to amend its complaint. Order
No. 27 (Jul. 31, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Aug. 16, 2024). But
while US Conec was granted leave to
amend its complaint, US Conec never
filed an amended complaint. Therefore,
Protai Photonic Co., Ltd., Jarllytec Co.,
Ltd., and Wave2Wave Solutions Corp.
d/b/a FiberSmart were not added to the
investigation as respondents.
On September 23, 2024, US Conec
and the Senko Respondents jointly
moved to terminate the investigation
with respect to the Senko Respondents
based on settlement. That same day,
OUII filed a response in support of the
motion. No other party responded to the
motion.
On July 15, 2024, the ALJ issued the
subject ID granting the motion and
terminating the investigation with
respect to the Senko Respondents based
on settlement pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)).
Because the Senko Respondents were
the last remaining respondents in the
investigation, the ID also terminates the
investigation in its entirety. No petitions
for review of the subject ID were
received.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. This
investigation is hereby terminated.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on October 11,
2024.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
83702
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2024 / Notices
Issued: October 11, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–23968 Filed 10–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–486 and 731–
TA–1195–1196 (Second Review)]
Utility Scale Wind Towers From China
and Vietnam
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
countervailing duty order on utility
scale wind towers from China and
antidumping duty orders on utility scale
wind towers from China and Vietnam
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on April 1, 2024 (89 FR 22445)
and determined on July 5, 2024 that it
would conduct expedited reviews (89
FR 73723, September 11, 2024).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on October 11, 2024.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 5553
(October 2024), entitled Utility Scale
Wind Towers from China and Vietnam:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–486 and
731–TA–1195–1196 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 11, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
Unsecured Claim of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘Stipulation’’) with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware in In re PES Administrative
Services, LLC, Case No. 19–11629 (LSS).
The proposed Stipulation resolves
proofs of claim filed by the United
States, on behalf of the Environmental
Protection Agency, against Debtor
Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining
and Marketing LLC (‘‘PESRM’’) and
against a related entity, Debtor North
Yard Logistics, L.P. (‘‘North Yard’’),
seeking payment of a civil penalty
pursuant to Section 113(e) of the Clean
Air Act. As to PESRM, for alleged
violations of Section 112(r) of the Clean
Air Act in connection with a June 2019
fire and explosion at PESRM’s former
refinery complex located in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. As to North
Yard, for alleged violations of Section
112(r) of the Clean Air Act in
connection with a liquified petroleum
gas tank farm at the former refinery
complex. The proposed Stipulation
provides EPA with an allowed claim
against PESRM in the amount of
$4,200,000 and against North Yard in
the amount of $26,724.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Stipulation. Comments should
be addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
In re PES Administrative Services, LLC,
D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–10993/2. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
[FR Doc. 2024–23985 Filed 10–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Stipulation Under the Clean Air Act
On October 8, 2024, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Stipulation
Regarding the Allowance of a General
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Oct 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
Any comments submitted in writing
may be filed by the United States in
whole or in part on the public court
docket without notice to the commenter.
During the public comment period,
the proposed Stipulation may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
If you require assistance accessing the
proposed Stipulation, you may request
assistance by email or by mail to the
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addresses provided above for submitting
comments.
Ruben Gomez,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2024–23924 Filed 10–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Employee
Retirement Income Security Act
Procedure 1976–1; Advisory Opinion
Procedure
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting this Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA)-sponsored information
collection request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are
invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that the agency
receives on or before November 18,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Howell by telephone at 202–
693–6782, or by email at DOL_PRA_
PUBLIC@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1976,
the Department issued ERISA Procedure
76–1, the Procedure for ERISA Advisory
Opinions (ERISA Procedure), in order to
establish a public process for requesting
guidance from the Employee Benefits
Security Administration (EBSA) on the
application of ERISA to particular
circumstances. The ERISA Procedure
sets forth specific administrative
procedures for requesting either an
advisory opinion or an information
letter and describes the types of
questions that may be submitted.
As part of the ERISA Procedure,
requesters are instructed to provide
information to EBSA concerning the
circumstances governing their request.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 201 (Thursday, October 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83701-83702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1399]
Certain Fiber-Optic Connectors, Adapters, Jump Cables, Patch
Cords, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation Based on Settlement; Termination of the
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 34) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') terminating the two remaining respondents based on
settlement. The investigation is thus terminated in its entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 26, 2024, the Commission instituted
this investigation based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed on
behalf of US Conec, Ltd., of Hickory, North Carolina (``US Conec''). 89
FR 32459-60 (Apr. 26, 2024). The complaint alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain fiber-optic connectors, adapters, jump cables, patch cords,
products containing the same, and components thereof that infringe
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,733,466; 11,808,994; 11,906,794;
11,880,075; 11,385,415 and 10,495,823. Id. at 32459. The complaint also
alleged that a domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's notice of
investigation names as respondents Senko Advance Co., Ltd. of Yokkaichi
City, Japan and Senko Advanced Components, Inc. of Hudson,
Massachusetts (``the Senko Respondents''); Eaton Corp. of Dublin,
Ireland; Tripp Lite Holdings, Inc. of Woodridge, Illinois; FS.com Inc.
of New Castle, Delaware (``FS.com''); Infinite Electronics, Inc. of
Irvine, California; L-com, Inc. of North Andover, Massachusetts;
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. of Osaka, Japan, Sumitomo Electric
Lightwave Corp. of Raleigh, North Carolina, and Sumitomo Electric
U.S.A., Inc. of Torrance, California (together, ``Sumitomo''); EZconn
Corp. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Flexoptix GmbH of Darmstadt, Germany;
Shenzhen UnitekFiber Solution Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Hubbell Inc. of
Shelton, Connecticut; Hubbell Premise Wiring, Inc. of Shelton,
Connecticut; Shenzhen IH Optics Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Rayoptic
Communication Co., Ltd., of Shenzhen, China; and HuNan Surfiber
Technology Co., Ltd. of Changsha, China. Id. at 32460. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is participating in this
investigation. Id.
The Commission previously terminated the investigation in part
based on the entry of consent orders with respect to the following
respondents: FS.com Inc., Order No. 15 (Jun. 25, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (Jul. 24, 2024); Shenzhen IH Optics Co., Ltd., Order No.
16 (Jun. 26, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Jul. 24, 2024);
Flexoptix GmbH, Order No. 17 (Jun. 26, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n
Notice (Jul. 24, 2024). The Commission also previously terminated the
investigation in part based on settlement with respect to Sumitomo.
Sumitomo, Order No. 21 (Jul. 15, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice
(Aug. 8, 2024).
The Commission further previously terminated the investigation in
part based on US Conec's withdrawal of the complaint with respect to
the following respondents: Hubbell Inc., Hubbell Premise Wiring, Inc.,
EZconn Corp., Changzhou Co-Net Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.,
Shenzhen UnitekFiber Solution Ltd., Rayoptic Communication Co., Ltd.,
HuNan Surfiber Technology Co., Ltd., Eaton Corp., Tripp Lite Holdings,
Inc., Infinite Electronics, Inc., and L-Com, LLC. Order No. 33 (Sept.
3, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 3, 2024).
On July 9, 2024, US Conec filed a motion for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to add three respondents: Protai
Photonic Co., Ltd., Jarllytec Co., Ltd., and Wave2Wave Solutions Corp.
d/b/a FiberSmart. The ALJ issued Order No. 27 granting the motion to
allow US Conec to amend its complaint. Order No. 27 (Jul. 31, 2024),
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 16, 2024). But while US Conec was
granted leave to amend its complaint, US Conec never filed an amended
complaint. Therefore, Protai Photonic Co., Ltd., Jarllytec Co., Ltd.,
and Wave2Wave Solutions Corp. d/b/a FiberSmart were not added to the
investigation as respondents.
On September 23, 2024, US Conec and the Senko Respondents jointly
moved to terminate the investigation with respect to the Senko
Respondents based on settlement. That same day, OUII filed a response
in support of the motion. No other party responded to the motion.
On July 15, 2024, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the motion
and terminating the investigation with respect to the Senko Respondents
based on settlement pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR
210.21(b)(1)). Because the Senko Respondents were the last remaining
respondents in the investigation, the ID also terminates the
investigation in its entirety. No petitions for review of the subject
ID were received.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. This
investigation is hereby terminated.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on October
11, 2024.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 83702]]
Issued: October 11, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-23968 Filed 10-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P