Michelin North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 80987-80988 [2024-23016]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
V. Summary of Comoto’s Petition: The
following views and arguments
presented in this section, ‘‘V. Summary
of Comoto’s Petition,’’ are the views and
arguments provided by Comoto. They
have not been evaluated by the Agency
and do not reflect the views of the
Agency. Comoto describes the subject
noncompliance and contends that the
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
Comoto states that the subject
noncompliance should be deemed
inconsequential because the result was
2.07ms, which Comoto says is
‘‘remarkably close to a PASS.’’
Furthermore, Comoto states the same
model and size helmets have met this
requirement in prior years, as far back
as December 2017.
Comoto concludes by stating its belief
that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety and its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject motorcycle helmets that
Comoto no longer controlled at the time
it determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant motorcycle helmets
under their control after Comoto
notified them that the subject
noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–23011 Filed 10–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 03, 2024
Jkt 265001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2021–0077; Notice 2]
Michelin North America, LLC, Grant of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
Michelin North America, LLC
(MNA), has determined that certain
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
replacement passenger car tires do not
fully comply with Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for
Light Vehicles. MNA filed a
noncompliance report dated September
14, 2021. MNA subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on September 30, 2021, and
later supplemented the petition on
September 30, 2022, for a decision that
the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety. This document
announces the grant of MNA’s petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayton Lindley, General Engineer,
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, (325) 655–0547.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Overview
MNA has determined that certain
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
replacement passenger car tires do not
fully comply with the requirements of
paragraph S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139,
New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light
Vehicles (49 CFR 571.139). MNA filed a
noncompliance report dated September
14, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. MNA
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on
September 30, 2021, and later
supplemented the petition on
September 30, 2022, for an exemption
from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part
556, Exemption for Inconsequential
Defect or Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of MNA’s petition
was published with a 30-day public
comment period, on June 23, 2022, in
the Federal Register (87 FR 37553). No
comments were received. To view the
petition and all supporting documents
log onto the Federal Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80987
Management System (FDMS) website at
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2021–
0077.’’
II. Tires Involved
According to MNA approximately
3,589 Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4,
size 295/40ZR21 111Y XL, replacement
passenger car tires, manufactured
between October 7, 2020, and August
20, 2021, and sold in the United States
and Canada were affected by the subject
noncompliance. MNA says that of the
3,589 tires, 1,729 tires entered the U.S.
market, 110 entered the Canadian
market, and the remaining 1,750 were
blocked in MNA’s inventory control
system to be repaired or scrapped. For
the 110 tires that entered the Canadian
market, the Agency cannot exempt
MNA from the duties found in sections
30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify
owners, purchasers, and dealers of a
defect or noncompliance and to remedy
the defect or noncompliance for those
tires. Therefore, the Agency’s decision
will only apply to the 1,729 tires that
entered the U.S. market.
III. Noncompliance
MNA explains that the
noncompliance was due to a mold error
in which one sidewall, the serial
sidewall, of the subject tires incorrectly
states the maximum load range as
required by paragraph S5.5.4(b) of
FMVSS No. 139. Specifically, the
subject tires were marked with a
maximum load of 1,090 kg (1,433 lbs.)
when the conversion of kilograms to
pounds should have resulted in a
maximum load of 1,090 kg (2,403 lbs.).
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No.
139 includes the requirements relevant
to this petition. For passenger car tires,
if the maximum inflation pressure of a
tire is 240, 280, 300, 340, or 350 kPa,
then each marking of the tire’s
maximum load rating in kilograms must
be followed in parenthesis by the
equivalent load rating in pounds,
rounded to the nearest whole number.
V. Summary of MNA’s Petition
The following views and arguments
presented in this section, ‘‘V. Summary
of MNA’s Petition,’’ are the views and
arguments provided by MNA and do not
reflect the views of the Agency. MNA
describes the subject noncompliance
and contends that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety for the following reasons:
MNA asserts that although
erroneously marked, the subject tires
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
80988
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2024 / Notices
were ‘‘designed as a load index 111 tire,
with a maximum load rating of 1090
kilograms, or 2,403 pounds.’’ MNA says
that the subject tires ‘‘fully comply with
Michelin performance requirements’’
and with all applicable FMVSSs.
According to MNA, other than the tire
maximum load rating in pounds, the
tires are correctly marked and ‘‘provide
both dealers and consumers with the
necessary information to enable proper
selection and application of the tires.’’
MNA says that if a consumer were to go
by the erroneous maximum load, in
pounds, based on the markings on the
tire, the tire would be put ‘‘into service
respecting a maximum load of 1,433
lbs., which is less than the actual
designed maximum load of 2,403 lbs.’’
MNA cites the following past
inconsequentiality petitions NHTSA has
granted that MNA claims are similar to
the subject petition:
• Bridgestone Americas Tire
Operations, LLC, Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance. See 78 FR 35357, June
12, 2013;
• The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company, Grant of Petition for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See
70 FR 41254, July 18, 2005;
• Continental Tire North America
Inc., Grant of Application for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See
70 FR 14748, March 23, 2005;
• Michelin North America, Inc., Grant
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 69
FR 62511, October 26, 2004; and
• Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Grant of
Application for Decision That
Noncompliance Is Inconsequential to
Motor Vehicle Safety. See 66 FR 57772,
November 16, 2001.
MNA states that they have ‘‘captured
and retained’’ a total of 1,750 tires with
the intent to either repair or scrap them.
MNA also states that they have
corrected the tire specification drawing
and updated the mold to reflect the
correct maximum load in pounds.
MNA concludes that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety and that
its petition to be exempted from
providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
On August 1, 2022, NHTSA requested
that MNA provide documentation that
the subject tires comply with the
performance requirements and all other
labeling requirements of FMVSS No.
139. MNA’s response was received on
September 30, 2022. MNA stated that
the subject tires comply with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Oct 03, 2024
Jkt 265001
applicable performance requirements
and provided documentation under
request for confidential treatment in
support. Additionally, MNA provided
photographs to show that the subject
tires comply with all of the necessary
labeling requirements, with the
exception of the load range marking.
VI. NHTSA’s Analysis
NHTSA has evaluated the merits of
the petition submitted by MNA and is
granting MNA’s request for relief from
notification and remedy based on the
following:
1. NHTSA has no basis to believe that
the subject tires do not meet the
performance and labeling requirements
of FMVSS No. 139, with the exception
of the load markings.
2. NHTSA agrees that if consumers
were to follow the incorrect maximum
loading value in pounds on the
outboard sidewall of the tire, the tire
would not be in overloaded condition.
Additionally, the tires are marked with
the correct load index, and the correct
maximum loading values in kilograms
on the outboard sidewall. Additionally,
the inboard sidewall also contains the
correct maximum loading values in both
kilograms and pounds.
3. NHTSA believes that the incorrect
maximum load values do not affect the
ability of the manufacturer or consumer
to identify the affected tires in the event
of a recall.
The agency notes that the petitioner
has provided citations to prior
inconsequentiality determinations in
support of the present request. The
agency notes that inconsequentiality
determinations are highly fact specific
and as such should not be regarded as
binding precedent.
VII. NHTSA’s Decision
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA finds that MNA has met its
burden of persuasion that the subject
FMVSS No. 139 noncompliance in the
affected tires is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
MNA’s petition is hereby granted and
MNA is consequently exempted from
the obligation of providing notification
of, and a free remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject tires
that MNA no longer controlled at the
time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve
tire distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their
control after MNA notified them that the
subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–23016 Filed 10–3–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names
of a vessel and persons whose property
and interests in property have been
unblocked and which have been
removed from the Specially Designated
Nationals and Blocked Persons List
(SDN List).
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for applicable date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Associate Director for Global
Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; Assistant
Director for Licensing, tel.: 202–622–
2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory
Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855; or the
Assistant Director for Compliance, tel.:
202–622–2490 or https://
ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Availability
The SDN List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notice of OFAC Action(s)
A. On September 10, 2024, OFAC
removed from the SDN List the vessel
listed below, which was subject to
prohibitions imposed pursuant to
Executive Order 14024 of April 15,
2021, ‘‘Blocking Property With Respect
To Specified Harmful Foreign Activities
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80987-80988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23016]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0077; Notice 2]
Michelin North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Michelin North America, LLC (MNA), has determined that certain
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 replacement passenger car tires do
not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. MNA filed a
noncompliance report dated September 14, 2021. MNA subsequently
petitioned NHTSA on September 30, 2021, and later supplemented the
petition on September 30, 2022, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This document announces the grant of MNA's petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, General Engineer,
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (325) 655-0547.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
MNA has determined that certain Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
replacement passenger car tires do not fully comply with the
requirements of paragraph S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139, New Pneumatic
Radial Tires for Light Vehicles (49 CFR 571.139). MNA filed a
noncompliance report dated September 14, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part
573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. MNA
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on September 30, 2021, and later
supplemented the petition on September 30, 2022, for an exemption from
the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on
the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and
49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of MNA's petition was published with a 30-day
public comment period, on June 23, 2022, in the Federal Register (87 FR
37553). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2021-0077.''
II. Tires Involved
According to MNA approximately 3,589 Michelin Pilot Sport All
Season 4, size 295/40ZR21 111Y XL, replacement passenger car tires,
manufactured between October 7, 2020, and August 20, 2021, and sold in
the United States and Canada were affected by the subject
noncompliance. MNA says that of the 3,589 tires, 1,729 tires entered
the U.S. market, 110 entered the Canadian market, and the remaining
1,750 were blocked in MNA's inventory control system to be repaired or
scrapped. For the 110 tires that entered the Canadian market, the
Agency cannot exempt MNA from the duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a
defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance for
those tires. Therefore, the Agency's decision will only apply to the
1,729 tires that entered the U.S. market.
III. Noncompliance
MNA explains that the noncompliance was due to a mold error in
which one sidewall, the serial sidewall, of the subject tires
incorrectly states the maximum load range as required by paragraph
S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139. Specifically, the subject tires were marked
with a maximum load of 1,090 kg (1,433 lbs.) when the conversion of
kilograms to pounds should have resulted in a maximum load of 1,090 kg
(2,403 lbs.).
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139 includes the requirements
relevant to this petition. For passenger car tires, if the maximum
inflation pressure of a tire is 240, 280, 300, 340, or 350 kPa, then
each marking of the tire's maximum load rating in kilograms must be
followed in parenthesis by the equivalent load rating in pounds,
rounded to the nearest whole number.
V. Summary of MNA's Petition
The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V.
Summary of MNA's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided by
MNA and do not reflect the views of the Agency. MNA describes the
subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
MNA asserts that although erroneously marked, the subject tires
[[Page 80988]]
were ``designed as a load index 111 tire, with a maximum load rating of
1090 kilograms, or 2,403 pounds.'' MNA says that the subject tires
``fully comply with Michelin performance requirements'' and with all
applicable FMVSSs. According to MNA, other than the tire maximum load
rating in pounds, the tires are correctly marked and ``provide both
dealers and consumers with the necessary information to enable proper
selection and application of the tires.'' MNA says that if a consumer
were to go by the erroneous maximum load, in pounds, based on the
markings on the tire, the tire would be put ``into service respecting a
maximum load of 1,433 lbs., which is less than the actual designed
maximum load of 2,403 lbs.''
MNA cites the following past inconsequentiality petitions NHTSA has
granted that MNA claims are similar to the subject petition:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Grant of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 78 FR
35357, June 12, 2013;
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 70 FR 41254, July 18,
2005;
Continental Tire North America Inc., Grant of Application
for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 70 FR 14748, March
23, 2005;
Michelin North America, Inc., Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 69 FR 62511, October 26,
2004; and
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Grant of Application for
Decision That Noncompliance Is Inconsequential to Motor Vehicle Safety.
See 66 FR 57772, November 16, 2001.
MNA states that they have ``captured and retained'' a total of
1,750 tires with the intent to either repair or scrap them. MNA also
states that they have corrected the tire specification drawing and
updated the mold to reflect the correct maximum load in pounds.
MNA concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as
it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be exempted
from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
On August 1, 2022, NHTSA requested that MNA provide documentation
that the subject tires comply with the performance requirements and all
other labeling requirements of FMVSS No. 139. MNA's response was
received on September 30, 2022. MNA stated that the subject tires
comply with the applicable performance requirements and provided
documentation under request for confidential treatment in support.
Additionally, MNA provided photographs to show that the subject tires
comply with all of the necessary labeling requirements, with the
exception of the load range marking.
VI. NHTSA's Analysis
NHTSA has evaluated the merits of the petition submitted by MNA and
is granting MNA's request for relief from notification and remedy based
on the following:
1. NHTSA has no basis to believe that the subject tires do not meet
the performance and labeling requirements of FMVSS No. 139, with the
exception of the load markings.
2. NHTSA agrees that if consumers were to follow the incorrect
maximum loading value in pounds on the outboard sidewall of the tire,
the tire would not be in overloaded condition. Additionally, the tires
are marked with the correct load index, and the correct maximum loading
values in kilograms on the outboard sidewall. Additionally, the inboard
sidewall also contains the correct maximum loading values in both
kilograms and pounds.
3. NHTSA believes that the incorrect maximum load values do not
affect the ability of the manufacturer or consumer to identify the
affected tires in the event of a recall.
The agency notes that the petitioner has provided citations to
prior inconsequentiality determinations in support of the present
request. The agency notes that inconsequentiality determinations are
highly fact specific and as such should not be regarded as binding
precedent.
VII. NHTSA's Decision
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that MNA has met its
burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 139 noncompliance in
the affected tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, MNA's petition is hereby granted and MNA is consequently
exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and a free
remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the subject tires that MNA no longer controlled at the
time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve tire distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or
introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their control after MNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-23016 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P