Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination, 80264 [2024-22665]

Download as PDF lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 80264 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Notices 2809.15(b)(ii), as well as NEPA conformance, the presumptive leaseholder will become the leaseholder. The leaseholder must then submit a final Plan of Development in accordance with 43 CFR 2809.18(c). The successful bidder will not become the presumptive leaseholder if they do not satisfy the requirements in 43 CFR 2809.15, do not execute the lease, or is for any reason disqualified from holding the lease. In the case when the successful bidder does not satisfy the requirements to become a presumptive leaseholder, the BLM may make the next highest bidder the successful bidder or re-offer the lands. The BLM will keep all money that has been submitted with the competitive process if the successful bidder does not satisfy the requirements of 43 CFR 2809.15(d). The successful bidder must submit payment of the minimum bid and at least 20 percent of the winning bonus bid to the BLM Las Cruces District Office no later than noon on November 15, 2024. Within 15 calendar days after the auction, the successful bidder must: (1) pay the balance of the bonus bid (after the variable offsets are applied); and (2) submit the acreage rent for the first full year of the solar energy development lease. This amount will be applied toward the first 12 months acreage rent if the successful bidder becomes the leaseholder. Any required payments must be submitted by personal check, cashier’s check, certified check, bank draft (wire transfer or Automated Clearing House), or money order, or by other means deemed acceptable by the BLM, payable to the Department of the Interior— Bureau of Land Management. The administrative fee portion of the minimum bid will be retained by the agency to recover administrative costs for conducting the competitive bidding and related processes. The remainder of the minimum bid and bonus bid will be deposited with the U.S. Treasury. There will be no returned or refunded money to the successful bidder(s). Only interests in issued right-of-way (ROW) leases are assignable under the regulations at 43 CFR 2807.21. The interest acquired by the successful bidder from this auction may not be assigned or sold to another party prior to the issuance of a ROW lease. The successful bidder may, however, continue to pursue their application if the successful bidder becomes a wholly owned subsidiary of a new third party. Section 50265(b)(1) of the Inflation Reduction Act (codified at 43 U.S.C. 3006(b)(1)) conditions the issuance of wind and solar energy development VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:16 Oct 01, 2024 Jkt 262001 ROWs on: (1) the BLM having held an onshore oil and gas lease sale during the 120-day period before the issuance of the wind or solar energy development; and (2) the BLM having offered—in the 1-year period preceding the date of the issuance of the lease—the lesser of two million acres or 50 percent of acreage for which expressions of interest had been submitted in that year. The BLM will ensure compliance with these provisions prior to issuing the solar development ROW lease to the successful bidder, if any. (Authority: 43 CFR subpart 2809) Melanie G. Barnes, State Director, New Mexico State Office. [FR Doc. 2024–22597 Filed 10–1–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4331–23–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Third Review)] Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on sodium hexametaphosphate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted this review on February 1 (89 FR 6547, February 1, 2024) and determined on May 6, 2024, that it would conduct an expedited review (89 FR 48443, June 6, 2024). The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on September 27, 2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5549 (September 2024), entitled Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Third Review). By order of the Commission. 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Issued: September 27, 2024. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2024–22665 Filed 10–1–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950 Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 708 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (‘‘DPA’’), that the Assistant Attorney General finds, with respect to the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (‘‘VISA’’) proposed by the Maritime Administration (‘‘MARAD’’), that the purposes of section 708(c)(1) of the may not reasonably be achieved through a voluntary agreement or plan of action having less anticompetitive effects or without any voluntary agreement or plan of action. Under the DPA, MARAD may enter into agreements with representatives of private industry for the purpose of improving the efficiency with which private firms contribute to the national defense when conditions exist that may pose a direct threat to the national defense or its preparedness. Such arrangements are generally known as ‘‘voluntary agreements.’’ A defense to actions brought under the antitrust laws is available to each participant acting within the scope of a voluntary agreement that has come into force under the DPA. The DPA requires that each proposed voluntary agreement be reviewed by the Attorney General prior to becoming effective. If, after consulting with the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, the Attorney General finds that the purpose of the DPA ‘‘may not be reasonably achieved through a voluntary agreement having less anticompetitive effects or without any voluntary agreement or plan of action,’’ the agreement may become effective. 50 U.S.C. 4558 (f)(l)(B). All functions which the Attorney General is required or authorized to perform by section 708 of the DPA have been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division. 28 CFR 0.40(l). The purpose of the proposed VISA is to support Department of Defense (‘‘DoD’’) contingency requirements to provide cargo capacity during times of crisis through procedures agreed in advance. The proposed VISA establishes the terms, conditions and procedures under which participants agree voluntarily to make tankers available to E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22665]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Third Review)]


Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on sodium 
hexametaphosphate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on February 1 (89 FR 6547, 
February 1, 2024) and determined on May 6, 2024, that it would conduct 
an expedited review (89 FR 48443, June 6, 2024).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on September 27, 2024. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5549 (September 2024), 
entitled Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-
1110 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 27, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-22665 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.