Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination, 80264 [2024-22665]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
80264
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2024 / Notices
2809.15(b)(ii), as well as NEPA
conformance, the presumptive
leaseholder will become the
leaseholder. The leaseholder must then
submit a final Plan of Development in
accordance with 43 CFR 2809.18(c).
The successful bidder will not
become the presumptive leaseholder if
they do not satisfy the requirements in
43 CFR 2809.15, do not execute the
lease, or is for any reason disqualified
from holding the lease. In the case when
the successful bidder does not satisfy
the requirements to become a
presumptive leaseholder, the BLM may
make the next highest bidder the
successful bidder or re-offer the lands.
The BLM will keep all money that has
been submitted with the competitive
process if the successful bidder does not
satisfy the requirements of 43 CFR
2809.15(d).
The successful bidder must submit
payment of the minimum bid and at
least 20 percent of the winning bonus
bid to the BLM Las Cruces District
Office no later than noon on November
15, 2024. Within 15 calendar days after
the auction, the successful bidder must:
(1) pay the balance of the bonus bid
(after the variable offsets are applied);
and (2) submit the acreage rent for the
first full year of the solar energy
development lease. This amount will be
applied toward the first 12 months
acreage rent if the successful bidder
becomes the leaseholder.
Any required payments must be
submitted by personal check, cashier’s
check, certified check, bank draft (wire
transfer or Automated Clearing House),
or money order, or by other means
deemed acceptable by the BLM, payable
to the Department of the Interior—
Bureau of Land Management. The
administrative fee portion of the
minimum bid will be retained by the
agency to recover administrative costs
for conducting the competitive bidding
and related processes. The remainder of
the minimum bid and bonus bid will be
deposited with the U.S. Treasury. There
will be no returned or refunded money
to the successful bidder(s).
Only interests in issued right-of-way
(ROW) leases are assignable under the
regulations at 43 CFR 2807.21. The
interest acquired by the successful
bidder from this auction may not be
assigned or sold to another party prior
to the issuance of a ROW lease. The
successful bidder may, however,
continue to pursue their application if
the successful bidder becomes a wholly
owned subsidiary of a new third party.
Section 50265(b)(1) of the Inflation
Reduction Act (codified at 43 U.S.C.
3006(b)(1)) conditions the issuance of
wind and solar energy development
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Oct 01, 2024
Jkt 262001
ROWs on: (1) the BLM having held an
onshore oil and gas lease sale during the
120-day period before the issuance of
the wind or solar energy development;
and (2) the BLM having offered—in the
1-year period preceding the date of the
issuance of the lease—the lesser of two
million acres or 50 percent of acreage
for which expressions of interest had
been submitted in that year. The BLM
will ensure compliance with these
provisions prior to issuing the solar
development ROW lease to the
successful bidder, if any.
(Authority: 43 CFR subpart 2809)
Melanie G. Barnes,
State Director, New Mexico State Office.
[FR Doc. 2024–22597 Filed 10–1–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331–23–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Third
Review)]
Sodium Hexametaphosphate From
China; Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on sodium
hexametaphosphate from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on February 1 (89 FR 6547,
February 1, 2024) and determined on
May 6, 2024, that it would conduct an
expedited review (89 FR 48443, June 6,
2024).
The Commission made this
determination pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determination in
this review on September 27, 2024. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 5549 (September
2024), entitled Sodium
Hexametaphosphate from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Third
Review).
By order of the Commission.
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued: September 27, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–22665 Filed 10–1–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the Defense
Production Act of 1950
Notice is hereby given pursuant to
section 708 of the Defense Production
Act of 1950 (‘‘DPA’’), that the Assistant
Attorney General finds, with respect to
the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift
Agreement (‘‘VISA’’) proposed by the
Maritime Administration (‘‘MARAD’’),
that the purposes of section 708(c)(1) of
the may not reasonably be achieved
through a voluntary agreement or plan
of action having less anticompetitive
effects or without any voluntary
agreement or plan of action.
Under the DPA, MARAD may enter
into agreements with representatives of
private industry for the purpose of
improving the efficiency with which
private firms contribute to the national
defense when conditions exist that may
pose a direct threat to the national
defense or its preparedness. Such
arrangements are generally known as
‘‘voluntary agreements.’’ A defense to
actions brought under the antitrust laws
is available to each participant acting
within the scope of a voluntary
agreement that has come into force
under the DPA.
The DPA requires that each proposed
voluntary agreement be reviewed by the
Attorney General prior to becoming
effective. If, after consulting with the
Chair of the Federal Trade Commission,
the Attorney General finds that the
purpose of the DPA ‘‘may not be
reasonably achieved through a
voluntary agreement having less
anticompetitive effects or without any
voluntary agreement or plan of action,’’
the agreement may become effective. 50
U.S.C. 4558 (f)(l)(B). All functions
which the Attorney General is required
or authorized to perform by section 708
of the DPA have been delegated to the
Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust
Division. 28 CFR 0.40(l).
The purpose of the proposed VISA is
to support Department of Defense
(‘‘DoD’’) contingency requirements to
provide cargo capacity during times of
crisis through procedures agreed in
advance. The proposed VISA establishes
the terms, conditions and procedures
under which participants agree
voluntarily to make tankers available to
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22665]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1110 (Third Review)]
Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China; Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on sodium
hexametaphosphate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted this review on February 1 (89 FR 6547,
February 1, 2024) and determined on May 6, 2024, that it would conduct
an expedited review (89 FR 48443, June 6, 2024).
The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its
determination in this review on September 27, 2024. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5549 (September 2024),
entitled Sodium Hexametaphosphate from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-
1110 (Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-22665 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P