Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Intent To Rescind, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022, 74204-74206 [2024-20759]
Download as PDF
74204
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices
Comanche District-Carrizo Unit
District Ranger decisions: Plainsman
Herald. A ‘‘courtesy’’ copy will also be
published in the Tribune Democrat.
Comanche District-Timpas Unit
District Ranger decisions: Tribune
Democrat.
Cimarron District Ranger decisions:
Elkhart Tri-State News.
South Platte District Ranger decisions:
Douglas County News Press.
Leadville District Ranger decisions:
Herald Democrat.
Salida District Ranger decisions: The
Mountain Mail.
South Park District Ranger decisions:
Fairplay Flume.
Pikes Peak District Ranger decisions:
The Gazette.
Rio Grande National Forest
Forest Supervisor and District Ranger
decisions: Valley Courier.
San Juan National Forest
Forest Supervisor decisions: Durango
Herald.
Columbine District Ranger decisions:
Durango Herald.
Pagosa District Ranger decisions:
Pagosa Sun.
Dolores District Ranger decisions:
Cortez Journal.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–20–2024]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38;
Authorization of Production Activity;
BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC;
(Passenger Motor Vehicles);
Spartanburg, South Carolina
On May 10, 2024, BMW
Manufacturing Company, LLC
submitted a notification of proposed
production activity to the FTZ Board for
its facility within Subzone 38A, in
Spartanburg, South Carolina.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (89 FR 42423–42424,
May 15, 2024). On September 9, 2024,
the applicant was notified of the FTZ
Board’s decision that no further review
of the activity is warranted at this time.
The production activity described in the
notification was authorized, subject to
the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s
regulations, including section 400.14.
Dated: September 9, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–20670 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Shoshone National Forest
Forest Supervisor decisions: Cody
Enterprise.
Clarks Fork District Ranger decisions:
Powell Tribune.
Wapiti and Greybull Districts Ranger
decisions: Cody Enterprise.
Wind River District Ranger decisions:
The Dubois Frontier.
Washakie District Ranger decisions:
Lander Journal.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Forest Supervisor decisions: The
Glenwood Springs Post Independent.
Aspen-Sopris District Ranger
decisions: Aspen Times.
Blanco District Ranger decisions:
Herald Times.
Dillon District Ranger decisions:
Summit Daily.
Eagle-Holy Cross District Ranger
decisions: Vail Daily.
Rifle District Ranger decisions: Citizen
Telegram.
Keith Lannom,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2024–20720 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
20:43 Sep 11, 2024
International Trade Administration
[C–570–134]
Certain Metal Lockers and Parts
Thereof From the People’s Republic of
China: Preliminary Results and Intent
To Rescind, in Part, of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that countervailable
subsidies were provided to producers
and exporters of certain metal lockers
and parts thereof (metal lockers) from
the People’s Republic of China (China).
The period of review (POR) is January
1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. In
addition, Commerce, intends to rescind
this review with respect to four
companies. Interested parties are invited
to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Delgado, AD/CVD Operations,
AGENCY:
White River National Forest
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1468.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 18, 2023, based on timely
requests for review, Commerce initiated
this administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on metal
lockers from China.1 On December 18,
2023, Commerce selected Hangzhou
Evernew Machinery and Equipment
Company Limited (Hangzhou Evernew)
and Xingyi Metalworking Technology
(Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. (Xingyi
Metalworking) as the mandatory
respondents in this review.2 On April 1,
2024, Commerce extended the deadline
for the preliminary results of this review
until August 30, 2024.3 On July 22,
2024, Commerce tolled certain
deadlines in this administrative
proceeding by seven days,4 and
therefore the deadline for these
preliminary results is September 6,
2024.
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.5 A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is provided in the
appendix to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.
gov. In addition, a complete version of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly at https://
access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices
ListLayout.aspx.
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR
71829 (October 18, 2023) (Initiation Notice); see
also See Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 46826
(August 20, 2021) (Order).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’
dated December 19, 2023.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review,’’ dated April 1, 2024.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Administrative
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain
Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China; 2022,’’ dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
74205
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the Order is
metal lockers from China. For a
complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Intent To Rescind Administrative
Review, in Part
It is Commerce’s practice to rescind
an administrative review of a
countervailing duty order, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR for which
liquidation is suspended.6 Normally,
upon completion of an administrative
review, the suspended entries are
liquidated at the countervailing duty
assessment rate calculated for the
review period.7 Therefore, for an
administrative review of a company to
be conducted, there must be a
reviewable, suspended entry that
Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate
at the calculated countervailing duty
assessment rate calculated for the
review period.8
According to the CBP import data on
the record, there are four companies
subject to this review that did not have
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR for which
liquidation is suspended: Kunshan
Dongchu Precision Machinery Co., Ltd.;
Pingchu Chenda Storage Office Co.,
Ltd.; Tianjin Jia Mei Metal Furniture
Ltd.; and Zhejiang Xingyi Metal
Products Co., Ltd. Accordingly, in the
absence of reviewable, suspended
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR, we intend to rescind this
administrative review with respect to
these four companies, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this
administrative review in accordance
with 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). For each of
the subsidy programs found
countervailable, Commerce
preliminarily determines that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by
an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a
benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.9 For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, including
our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise
available with adverse inferences
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
Under Review
The Act and Commerce’s regulations
do not address the establishment of a
rate to apply to companies not selected
for individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However,
Commerce normally determines the
rates for non-selected companies in
reviews in a manner that is consistent
with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation.
Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides
that ‘‘the individual countervailable
subsidy rates determined under
subparagraph (A) shall be used to
determine the all-others rate under
section 705(c)(5) {of the Act}.’’ Section
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that for
companies not investigated, in general,
we will determine an all-others rate by
weight averaging the countervailable
subsidy rates established for each of the
companies individually investigated,
excluding zero and de minimis rates or
any rates based entirely on facts
available.
Accordingly, to determine the rate for
companies not selected for individual
examination, Commerce’s practice is to
weight average the net subsidy rates for
the selected mandatory respondents,
excluding rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts
available.10 In this administrative
review, we calculated preliminary
individual estimated countervailable
subsidy rates for Hangzhou Evernew
and Xingyi Metalworking that are not
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts otherwise available. Commerce
calculated the rate assigned to the
companies under review that were not
selected for individual examination
using a simple average of the individual
estimated subsidy rates calculated for
the examined respondents.11
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine the following
net countervailable subsidy rates exist
for the POR, January 1, 2022, through
December 31, 2022:
Subsidy rate
(percent ad valorem)
Company
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Hangzhou Evernew Machinery & Equipment Company 12 .....................................................................................................
Xingyi Metalworking Technology (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................
Hangzhou Xline Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd 13 ..............................................................................................................
Jiangsu Wanlong Special Containers Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................
15.35
22.82
19.09
19.09
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its
calculations and analysis performed to
interested parties for these preliminary
results within five days of any public
announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
6 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
‘‘Partial Rescission of Administrative Review.’’
7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
8 See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
9 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
10 See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results
of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386, 37387 (June
29, 2010).
11 With two respondents under examination,
Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for
the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of
the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the
examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average
of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the
examined respondents using each company’s
publicly-ranged U.S. sales values for the
merchandise under consideration. Commerce then
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate
closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all
other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball
Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final
Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and
Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. As complete
publicly ranged sales data were not available,
Commerce based the all-others rate on a simple
average of the mandatory respondents’ estimated
subsidy rates.
12 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, Commerce has found the following
companies to be cross-owned with Hangzhou
Evernew: Zhejiang Yinghong Metalware Co., Ltd.
13 In the Initiation Notice, we initiated a review
of both Hangzhou Xline Machinery and Hangzhou
Xline Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd. We
preliminarily determine that these are two names
for the same company, and thus, we are assigning
the non-selected rate to the full name of the
company, Hangzhou Xline Machinery & Equipment
Co., Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Sep 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
74206
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
to Commerce no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.14 Interested parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding must submit: (1) a table
of contents listing each issue; and (2) a
table of authorities.15 All briefs must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety in
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on
the established deadline.
As provided under 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged
interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their briefs that
should be limited to five pages total,
including footnotes. In this review, we
instead request that interested parties
provide at the beginning of their briefs
a public, executive summary for each
issue raised in their briefs.16 Further, we
request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue
to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use
the public executive summaries as the
basis of the comment summaries
included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the
final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested
parties include footnotes for relevant
citations in the public executive
summary of each issue. Note that
Commerce has amended certain of its
requirements pertaining to the service of
documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests
should contain: (1) the party’s name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Oral
presentations at the hearing will be
14 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative
Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,
88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and
Service Procedures).
15 See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2)
16 We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an
argument that Commerce would normally address
in a comment of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
17 See APO and Service Procedures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Sep 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If
a request for a hearing is made,
Commerce will inform parties of the
scheduled date for the hearing.18
Dated: September 6, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Assessment Rates
Appendix
Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon
issuance of the final results, Commerce
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. For the
companies for which we intend to
rescind this review, upon issuance of
the final rescission, Commerce will
instruct CBP to assess CVDs on all
appropriate entries at a rate equal to the
cash deposit of estimated CVDs required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, during the
period January 1, 2022, through
December 31, 2022. Commerce intends
to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP
to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amount
indicated above with regard to
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the most recent
company-specific or all-others rate
applicable to the company, as
appropriate. These cash deposit
instructions, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
18 See
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2024–20759 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–883, A–549–837, A–588–878]
Glycine From India, Japan, and
Thailand: Final Results of the
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited
sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on glycine from India,
Japan, and Thailand would be likely to
lead to the continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 21, 2019, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
AD orders on glycine from India and
Japan and subsequently published the
AD order for the same product from
Thailand on October 18, 2019.1 On May
1 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
19 CFR 351.310(d).
Frm 00007
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Intent to Rescind Administrative Review,
in Part
V. Analysis of China’s Financial System
VI. Diversification of China’s Economy
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
VIII. Subsidies Valuation
IX. Benchmarks and Interest Rates
X. Analysis of Programs
XI. Rates for Non-Selected Companies
XII. Recommendation
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74204-74206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20759]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-134]
Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Intent To Rescind, in Part,
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers
and exporters of certain metal lockers and parts thereof (metal
lockers) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of
review (POR) is January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. In
addition, Commerce, intends to rescind this review with respect to four
companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Delgado, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1468.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 18, 2023, based on timely requests for review, Commerce
initiated this administrative review of the countervailing duty order
on metal lockers from China.\1\ On December 18, 2023, Commerce selected
Hangzhou Evernew Machinery and Equipment Company Limited (Hangzhou
Evernew) and Xingyi Metalworking Technology (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.
(Xingyi Metalworking) as the mandatory respondents in this review.\2\
On April 1, 2024, Commerce extended the deadline for the preliminary
results of this review until August 30, 2024.\3\ On July 22, 2024,
Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by
seven days,\4\ and therefore the deadline for these preliminary results
is September 6, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 71829 (October 18, 2023) (Initiation
Notice); see also See Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof from
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders, 86 FR 46826 (August 20, 2021) (Order).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated December 19,
2023.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated April
1, 2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\
A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
provided in the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China; 2022,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 74205]]
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the Order is metal lockers from China. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part
It is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of a
countervailing duty order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there
are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for
which liquidation is suspended.\6\ Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the
countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the review
period.\7\ Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce
can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at
the calculated countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the
review period.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Partial Rescission
of Administrative Review.''
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the CBP import data on the record, there are four
companies subject to this review that did not have reviewable entries
of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is
suspended: Kunshan Dongchu Precision Machinery Co., Ltd.; Pingchu
Chenda Storage Office Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jia Mei Metal Furniture Ltd.;
and Zhejiang Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd. Accordingly, in the
absence of reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise during
the POR, we intend to rescind this administrative review with respect
to these four companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance
with 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, Commerce
preliminarily determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the
recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\9\ For a full description
of the methodology underlying our conclusions, including our reliance,
in part, on facts otherwise available with adverse inferences pursuant
to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment
of a rate to apply to companies not selected for individual examination
when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce normally
determines the rates for non-selected companies in reviews in a manner
that is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which provides
instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation.
Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ``the individual
countervailable subsidy rates determined under subparagraph (A) shall
be used to determine the all-others rate under section 705(c)(5) {of
the Act{time} .'' Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that for
companies not investigated, in general, we will determine an all-others
rate by weight averaging the countervailable subsidy rates established
for each of the companies individually investigated, excluding zero and
de minimis rates or any rates based entirely on facts available.
Accordingly, to determine the rate for companies not selected for
individual examination, Commerce's practice is to weight average the
net subsidy rates for the selected mandatory respondents, excluding
rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available.\10\ In this administrative review, we calculated preliminary
individual estimated countervailable subsidy rates for Hangzhou Evernew
and Xingyi Metalworking that are not zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts otherwise available. Commerce calculated the rate
assigned to the companies under review that were not selected for
individual examination using a simple average of the individual
estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of the
13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386,
37387 (June 29, 2010).
\11\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates
calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the
estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents; and
(C) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for
the examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S.
sales values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters.
See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 1. As complete publicly ranged sales data were not
available, Commerce based the all-others rate on a simple average of
the mandatory respondents' estimated subsidy rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the
following net countervailable subsidy rates exist for the POR, January
1, 2022, through December 31, 2022:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with
Hangzhou Evernew: Zhejiang Yinghong Metalware Co., Ltd.
\13\ In the Initiation Notice, we initiated a review of both
Hangzhou Xline Machinery and Hangzhou Xline Machinery & Equipment
Co., Ltd. We preliminarily determine that these are two names for
the same company, and thus, we are assigning the non-selected rate
to the full name of the company, Hangzhou Xline Machinery &
Equipment Co., Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Company (percent ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hangzhou Evernew Machinery & Equipment Company 15.35
\12\.............................................
Xingyi Metalworking Technology (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd 22.82
Hangzhou Xline Machinery & Equipment Co., Ltd \13\ 19.09
Jiangsu Wanlong Special Containers Co., Ltd....... 19.09
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
[[Page 74206]]
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication
of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.\14\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing
each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\15\ All briefs must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Procedures).
\15\ See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that
interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public,
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\16\ Further,
we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary
of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We
intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the
comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that
will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We
request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant
citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note that
Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\17\ See APO and Service Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the
hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request
for a hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled
date for the hearing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review. For the companies for which we intend to rescind this review,
upon issuance of the final rescission, Commerce will instruct CBP to
assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash
deposit of estimated CVDs required at the time of entry, or withdrawal
from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2022,
through December 31, 2022. Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amount indicated above with regard to shipments of
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of
this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at
the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit instructions, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: September 6, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Intent to Rescind Administrative Review, in Part
V. Analysis of China's Financial System
VI. Diversification of China's Economy
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
VIII. Subsidies Valuation
IX. Benchmarks and Interest Rates
X. Analysis of Programs
XI. Rates for Non-Selected Companies
XII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-20759 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P