Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 74206-74207 [2024-20671]

Download as PDF 74206 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.14 Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.15 All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline. As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.16 Further, we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be 14 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and Service Procedures). 15 See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) 16 We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 17 See APO and Service Procedures. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:43 Sep 11, 2024 Jkt 262001 limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing.18 Dated: September 6, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Assessment Rates Appendix Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For the companies for which we intend to rescind this review, upon issuance of the final rescission, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess CVDs on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated CVDs required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amount indicated above with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit instructions, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 18 See PO 00000 Fmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2024–20759 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–883, A–549–837, A–588–878] Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1766. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On June 21, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD orders on glycine from India and Japan and subsequently published the AD order for the same product from Thailand on October 18, 2019.1 On May 1 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination 19 CFR 351.310(d). Frm 00007 List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Intent to Rescind Administrative Review, in Part V. Analysis of China’s Financial System VI. Diversification of China’s Economy VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences VIII. Subsidies Valuation IX. Benchmarks and Interest Rates X. Analysis of Programs XI. Rates for Non-Selected Companies XII. Recommendation Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices 1, 2024, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On May 13, 2024, Commerce received notices of intent to participate in these reviews from Deer Park Glycine, LLC of Deer Park, Texas, which is a subsidiary of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., and Chattem Chemicals, Inc. of Chattanooga, Tennessee (collectively, the domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the domestic like product in the United States.4 In May, 2024, Commerce received adequate substantive responses from the domestic industry parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 We received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties. On June 21, 2024, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive substantive responses from any respondent interested parties.6 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders. On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in these administrative proceedings by seven days.7 The deadline for these final results of sunset reviews is September 5, 2024. Scope of the Orders Notification to Interested Parties The products covered by these Orders are glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand. For a full description of the scope of the Orders, see the Issues and Decision.8 We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.9 A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade. gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be directly accessed at https:// access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices ListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighedaverage dumping margins up to 13.61 percent for India, 86.22 percent for Japan, and 227.17 percent for Thailand.10 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Administrative Protective Order and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170 (June 21, 2019); and Glycine from Thailand: Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 55912 (October 18, 2019) (collectively, Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 50110 (May 1, 2024). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Domestic Interested Parties’ Notification of Intent to Participate,’’ dated May 13, 2024. 4 Id. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from India: Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation, dated May 20, 2024; ‘‘Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 20, 2024; ‘‘Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from Thailand: Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 21, 2024; and ‘‘Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from Japan: Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 21, 2024. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on May 1, 2024,’’ dated June 21, 2024. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:43 Sep 11, 2024 Jkt 262001 74207 This notice serves as the only reminder to interested parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 9 Id. 10 See Orders. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: September 5, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2024–20671 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–469–817] Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2022–2023 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. In addition, we are rescinding the administrative review with respect to one company. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Teresa Aymerich or Drew Jackson, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0499 or (202) 482–4406, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On August 1, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74206-74207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-883, A-549-837, A-588-878]


Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the 
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S. 
Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the 
antidumping duty (AD) orders on glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand 
would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at 
the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section 
of this notice.

DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 21, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD 
orders on glycine from India and Japan and subsequently published the 
AD order for the same product from Thailand on October 18, 2019.\1\ On 
May

[[Page 74207]]

1, 2024, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first 
sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative 
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 
29170 (June 21, 2019); and Glycine from Thailand: Antidumping Duty 
Order, 84 FR 55912 (October 18, 2019) (collectively, Orders).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 50110 
(May 1, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 13, 2024, Commerce received notices of intent to participate 
in these reviews from Deer Park Glycine, LLC of Deer Park, Texas, which 
is a subsidiary of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., and Chattem 
Chemicals, Inc. of Chattanooga, Tennessee (collectively, the domestic 
interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(1)).\3\ The domestic interested parties claimed interested 
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the 
domestic like product in the United States.\4\ In May, 2024, Commerce 
received adequate substantive responses from the domestic industry 
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ We received no substantive responses from 
respondent interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Domestic 
Interested Parties' Notification of Intent to Participate,'' dated 
May 13, 2024.
    \4\ Id.
    \5\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letters, ``Sunset Review 
(1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from India: 
Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive Response to the Notice of 
Initiation, dated May 20, 2024; ``Domestic Interested Parties' 
Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 20, 
2024; ``Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on 
Glycine from Thailand: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive 
Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 21, 2024; and 
``Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on 
Glycine from Japan: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive 
Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 21, 2024, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade 
Commission that it did not receive substantive responses from any 
respondent interested parties.\6\ As a result, pursuant to section 
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on May 1, 
2024,'' dated June 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in these 
administrative proceedings by seven days.\7\ The deadline for these 
final results of sunset reviews is September 5, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The products covered by these Orders are glycine from India, Japan, 
and Thailand. For a full description of the scope of the Orders, see 
the Issues and Decision.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the 
Antidumping Duty Orders on Glycine from India, Japan, and 
Thailand,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews 
is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\9\ A 
list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is 
included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be directly accessed 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Reviews

    Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, 
Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to 
the continuation or recurrence of dumping and that the magnitude of the 
dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighed-average dumping 
margins up to 13.61 percent for India, 86.22 percent for Japan, and 
227.17 percent for Thailand.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to interested parties 
subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their 
responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to 
judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely notification of the 
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to 
sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
    2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2024-20671 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.