Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 74206-74207 [2024-20671]
Download as PDF
74206
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
to Commerce no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.14 Interested parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding must submit: (1) a table
of contents listing each issue; and (2) a
table of authorities.15 All briefs must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety in
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on
the established deadline.
As provided under 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged
interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their briefs that
should be limited to five pages total,
including footnotes. In this review, we
instead request that interested parties
provide at the beginning of their briefs
a public, executive summary for each
issue raised in their briefs.16 Further, we
request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue
to no more than 450 words, not
including citations. We intend to use
the public executive summaries as the
basis of the comment summaries
included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the
final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested
parties include footnotes for relevant
citations in the public executive
summary of each issue. Note that
Commerce has amended certain of its
requirements pertaining to the service of
documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests
should contain: (1) the party’s name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Oral
presentations at the hearing will be
14 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative
Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,
88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and
Service Procedures).
15 See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2)
16 We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an
argument that Commerce would normally address
in a comment of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
17 See APO and Service Procedures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Sep 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If
a request for a hearing is made,
Commerce will inform parties of the
scheduled date for the hearing.18
Dated: September 6, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Assessment Rates
Appendix
Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon
issuance of the final results, Commerce
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. For the
companies for which we intend to
rescind this review, upon issuance of
the final rescission, Commerce will
instruct CBP to assess CVDs on all
appropriate entries at a rate equal to the
cash deposit of estimated CVDs required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, during the
period January 1, 2022, through
December 31, 2022. Commerce intends
to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP
to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amount
indicated above with regard to
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the most recent
company-specific or all-others rate
applicable to the company, as
appropriate. These cash deposit
instructions, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
18 See
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2024–20759 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–883, A–549–837, A–588–878]
Glycine From India, Japan, and
Thailand: Final Results of the
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited
sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on glycine from India,
Japan, and Thailand would be likely to
lead to the continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 21, 2019, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
AD orders on glycine from India and
Japan and subsequently published the
AD order for the same product from
Thailand on October 18, 2019.1 On May
1 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
19 CFR 351.310(d).
Frm 00007
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Intent to Rescind Administrative Review,
in Part
V. Analysis of China’s Financial System
VI. Diversification of China’s Economy
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
VIII. Subsidies Valuation
IX. Benchmarks and Interest Rates
X. Analysis of Programs
XI. Rates for Non-Selected Companies
XII. Recommendation
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 177 / Thursday, September 12, 2024 / Notices
1, 2024, Commerce published the notice
of initiation of the first sunset reviews
of the Orders, pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).2
On May 13, 2024, Commerce received
notices of intent to participate in these
reviews from Deer Park Glycine, LLC of
Deer Park, Texas, which is a subsidiary
of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., and
Chattem Chemicals, Inc. of Chattanooga,
Tennessee (collectively, the domestic
interested parties), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)).3 The
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the
domestic like product in the United
States.4 In May, 2024, Commerce
received adequate substantive responses
from the domestic industry parties
within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 We received
no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties.
On June 21, 2024, Commerce notified
the U.S. International Trade
Commission that it did not receive
substantive responses from any
respondent interested parties.6 As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset
reviews of the Orders.
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled
certain deadlines in these
administrative proceedings by seven
days.7 The deadline for these final
results of sunset reviews is September 5,
2024.
Scope of the Orders
Notification to Interested Parties
The products covered by these Orders
are glycine from India, Japan, and
Thailand. For a full description of the
scope of the Orders, see the Issues and
Decision.8
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in these sunset reviews is
contained in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.9 A list of
topics discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is included as
an appendix to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.
gov. In addition, a complete version of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
can be directly accessed at https://
access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices
ListLayout.aspx.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Orders
would likely lead to the continuation or
recurrence of dumping and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail would be weighedaverage dumping margins up to 13.61
percent for India, 86.22 percent for
Japan, and 227.17 percent for
Thailand.10
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Administrative Protective Order
and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170 (June
21, 2019); and Glycine from Thailand: Antidumping
Duty Order, 84 FR 55912 (October 18, 2019)
(collectively, Orders).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88
FR 50110 (May 1, 2024).
3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter,
‘‘Domestic Interested Parties’ Notification of Intent
to Participate,’’ dated May 13, 2024.
4 Id.
5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Sunset
Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Glycine from India: Domestic Interested
Parties’ Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation, dated May 20, 2024; ‘‘Domestic
Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the
Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 20, 2024; ‘‘Sunset
Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Glycine from Thailand: Domestic
Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the
Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 21, 2024; and
‘‘Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Glycine from Japan: Domestic
Interested Parties’ Substantive Response to the
Notice of Initiation,’’ dated May 21, 2024.
6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on May 1, 2024,’’ dated June 21, 2024.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Sep 11, 2024
Jkt 262001
74207
This notice serves as the only
reminder to interested parties subject to
an administrative protective order
(APO) of their responsibility concerning
the return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a).
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited
First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Glycine from India, Japan, and
Thailand,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
9 Id.
10 See Orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: September 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping
Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–20671 Filed 9–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–469–817]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, and Partial
Rescission of Review; 2022–2023
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
finds that producers/exporters subject to
this administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR),
August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023.
In addition, we are rescinding the
administrative review with respect to
one company. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Teresa Aymerich or Drew
Jackson, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0499 or
(202) 482–4406, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 1, 2018, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74206-74207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-883, A-549-837, A-588-878]
Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty (AD) orders on glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand
would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at
the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section
of this notice.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 21, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD
orders on glycine from India and Japan and subsequently published the
AD order for the same product from Thailand on October 18, 2019.\1\ On
May
[[Page 74207]]
1, 2024, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first
sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR
29170 (June 21, 2019); and Glycine from Thailand: Antidumping Duty
Order, 84 FR 55912 (October 18, 2019) (collectively, Orders).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 50110
(May 1, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 13, 2024, Commerce received notices of intent to participate
in these reviews from Deer Park Glycine, LLC of Deer Park, Texas, which
is a subsidiary of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., and Chattem
Chemicals, Inc. of Chattanooga, Tennessee (collectively, the domestic
interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)).\3\ The domestic interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the
domestic like product in the United States.\4\ In May, 2024, Commerce
received adequate substantive responses from the domestic industry
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ We received no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Domestic
Interested Parties' Notification of Intent to Participate,'' dated
May 13, 2024.
\4\ Id.
\5\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letters, ``Sunset Review
(1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from India:
Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation, dated May 20, 2024; ``Domestic Interested Parties'
Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 20,
2024; ``Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Glycine from Thailand: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive
Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 21, 2024; and
``Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Glycine from Japan: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive
Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 21, 2024, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade
Commission that it did not receive substantive responses from any
respondent interested parties.\6\ As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on May 1,
2024,'' dated June 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in these
administrative proceedings by seven days.\7\ The deadline for these
final results of sunset reviews is September 5, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by these Orders are glycine from India, Japan,
and Thailand. For a full description of the scope of the Orders, see
the Issues and Decision.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Glycine from India, Japan, and
Thailand,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews
is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\9\ A
list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be directly accessed
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to
the continuation or recurrence of dumping and that the magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighed-average dumping
margins up to 13.61 percent for India, 86.22 percent for Japan, and
227.17 percent for Thailand.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to interested parties
subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-20671 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P