Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Rule Regarding Order and Execution Management Systems, 72537-72538 [2024-19950]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 172 / Thursday, September 5, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
$500 per hour) per intermediary to enter
into information sharing agreements.
Therefore, Commission staff estimates
that each newly formed fund group will
incur 400 hours of attorney time at a
cost of $200,000 12 and that all newly
formed fund groups will incur a total of
15,200 hours at a cost of $7,600,000 to
enter into information sharing
agreements with their intermediaries.13
Rule 22c–2(a)(3) requires funds to
maintain records of all informationsharing agreements for 6 years in an
easily accessible place. Commission
staff understands that most shareholder
information agreements are stored at the
fund group level and estimates that
there are currently approximately 797
fund groups.14 Commission staff
understands that information-sharing
agreements are generally included as
addendums to distribution agreements
between funds and their intermediaries,
and that these agreements would be
stored as required by the rule as a matter
of ordinary business practice. Therefore,
Commission staff estimates that
maintaining records of informationsharing agreements requires 10 minutes
of time spent by a general clerk (at a rate
of $75 per hour) per fund, each year.
Accordingly, Commission staff
estimates that all funds will incur 133
hours at a cost of $9,975 15 in complying
with the recordkeeping requirement of
rule 22c–2(a)(3). Therefore, Commission
staff estimates that to comply with the
information sharing agreement
requirements of rule 22c–2(a)(2) and (3),
it requires a total of 24,897 hours at a
cost of $12,391,975.16
The Commission staff estimates that
on average, each fund group requests
shareholder information once a week,
and gives instructions regarding the
restriction of shareholder trades every
day, for a total of 417 responses related
to information sharing systems per fund
group each year, and a total 331,552
responses for all fund groups
annually.17 In addition, as described
12 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: 4 hours × 100 intermediaries = 400
hours; 400 hours × $500 = $200,000.
13 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (38 fund groups × 400 hours = 15,200
hours) ($500 × 15,200 = 7,600,000).
14 ICI, 2024 Investment Company Fact Book at Fig
2.8 (2024) (https://www.icifactbook.org/pdf/2024factbook.pdf).
15 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (10 minutes × 797 fund groups = 7,970
minutes); (7,970 minutes/60 = 133 hours); (133
hours × $75 = $9,975).
16 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (9,564 hours + 15,200 hours + 133
hours = 24,897 hours); ($4,782,000 + $7,600,000 +
$9,975 = $12,391,975).
17 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (52 + 365 = 417); (417 × 797 fund
groups = 331,552).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:19 Sep 04, 2024
Jkt 262001
above, the staff estimates that funds
make 32 responses related to board
determinations, 2,391 responses related
to new intermediaries of existing fund
groups, 3,800 responses related to new
fund group information sharing
agreements, and 797 responses related
to recordkeeping, for a total of 7,020
responses related to the other
requirements of rule 22c–2. Therefore,
the Commission staff estimates that the
total number of responses is 338,572
(331,552 + 7,020 = 338,572). The
Commission staff estimates that the total
hour burden for rule 22c–2 is 25,313
hours at a cost of $12,392,344.18
Responses provided to the
Commission will be accorded the same
level of confidentiality accorded to
other responses provided to the
Commission in the context of its
examination and oversight program.
Responses provided in the context of
the Commission’s examination and
oversight program are generally kept
confidential. Complying with the
information collections of rule 22c–2 is
mandatory for funds that redeem their
shares within 7 days of purchase. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice by October 7, 2024 to (i)
MBX.OMB.OIRA.SEC_desk_officer@
omb.eop.gov and (ii) Austin Gerig,
Director/Chief Data Officer, Securities
and Exchange Commission, c/o
Oluwaseun Ajayi, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: August 30, 2024.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
BILLING CODE P
18 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: 416 hours (board determination) +
24,897 hours (information sharing agreements) =
25,313 total hours; $369,024 (board determination)
+ $12,391,975 (information sharing agreements) =
$12,392,344.
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100880; File No. SR–
CBOE–2024–008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Designation
of a Longer Period for Commission
Action on Proceedings To Determine
Whether To Approve or Disapprove a
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a
New Rule Regarding Order and
Execution Management Systems
August 30, 2024.
On February 13, 2024, Cboe
Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposal to adopt
a new rule regarding order and
execution management systems. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
March 5, 2024.3 The Commission has
received comment letters regarding the
proposed rule change.4
On April 16, 2024, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,5 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.6
On May 31, 2024, the Commission
instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 7 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.8
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 9 provides
that, after initiating proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing
of the proposed rule change. The
Commission may extend the period for
issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change,
however, by not more than 60 days if
the Commission determines that a
longer period is appropriate and
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99620
(February 28, 2024), 89 FR 15907 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 The public comment file for SR–CBOE–2024–
008 is available on the Commission’s website at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2024-008/
srcboe2024008.htm.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99963
(April 16, 2024), 89 FR 29389 (April 22, 2024).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100056
(May 31, 2024), 89 FR 48463 (June 6, 2024).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
2 17
[FR Doc. 2024–19902 Filed 9–4–24; 8:45 am]
72537
E:\FR\FM\05SEN1.SGM
05SEN1
72538
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 172 / Thursday, September 5, 2024 / Notices
publishes the reasons for such
determination. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on March 5,
2024.10 The 180th day after publication
of the proposed rule change is
September 1, 2024. The Commission is
extending the time period for approving
or disapproving the proposed rule
change for an additional 60 days.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change
and the issues raised therein.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11
designates October 31, 2024, as the date
by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–CBOE–2024–
008).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–19950 Filed 9–4–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100876; File No. SR–ICC–
2024–009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1, Relating to
the Clearing Rules, Risk Management
Framework, Governance Playbook and
Sixth Amended and Restated
Operating Agreement
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
August 29, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is
hereby given that on August 19, 2024,
ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been primarily prepared by ICC.
On August 27, 2024, ICC filed Partial
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The Commission is publishing
10 See
supra note 3.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Partial Amendment No. 1 amends the Exhibit
5A to correct a typographical error.
11 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:19 Sep 04, 2024
Jkt 262001
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1 (hereafter,
‘‘proposed rule change’’) from interested
persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
The principal purpose of the
proposed rule change is to revise its (i)
Clearing Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’), (ii) Risk
Management Framework (the
‘‘Framework’’), (iii) Governance
Playbook (the ‘‘Playbook’’), and (iv)
Sixth Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement (the ‘‘Operating
Agreement’’).
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICC
included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change, security-based swap
submission, or advance notice and
discussed any comments it received on
the proposed rule change, securitybased swap submission, or advance
notice. The text of these statements may
be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. ICC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
(a) Purpose
The amendments are intended
principally to provide for (i) the
elimination of the Risk Management
Subcommittee, (ii) the establishment of
a Risk Advisory Working Group and (iii)
expansion of the Risk Committee to
include representatives of NonParticipant Parties and clarification of
certain other arrangements relating to
the operation of the Risk Committee,
among other clarifications, as discussed
herein. ICC believes that such revisions
will facilitate the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions for which it
is responsible. ICC proposes to make
such changes effective following
Commission approval of the proposed
rule change. The proposed revisions are
described in detail as follows.
I. Rules
ICC proposes to eliminate its Risk
Management Subcommittee, which is
currently tasked under the Rules with
consulting with the Board and the Risk
Committee as to eligible products,
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
standards for ICC Clearing Participants
(‘‘Participants’’ or ‘‘CPs’’) and approvals
or denials of Participant applications.
ICC believes the subcommittee is
unnecessary and the relevant
consultative and advisory functions can
be performed (and in fact are typically
performed as a matter of current
practice) by the Risk Committee itself.
In addition, the newly established Risk
Advisory Working Group will support
those consultative and advisory
functions. Accordingly, ICC is amending
the Rules to remove references to the
Risk Management Subcommittee
throughout the Rules, including the
deletion of Rule 510 (which set out the
responsibilities of the Risk Management
Subcommittee) and Rule 511 (which
addresses the membership of Risk
Management Subcommittee), among
others.
Rules 201 and 202 (which cover
Qualifications and Applications of
Participants) would be amended to
remove references to the Risk
Management Subcommittee. In
addition, Rule 201 would be amended
to add references to the Risk
Committee’s consultation rights over
any proposed amendment to the
qualifications for Participants as well as
with respect to satisfying or ceasing to
satisfy ICC’s internal credit criteria, to
reflect current practices. Furthermore,
Rule 202 would be amended to add a
reference to the Risk Committee’s
consultation rights over approvals or
denials of Participant applications to
reflect current practices.
Rule 509 (which currently provides
for the establishment of the Risk
Management Subcommittee) would be
amended to provide for the
establishment of the new Risk Advisory
Working Group, as a forum to seek riskbased input from a broad array of
market participants regarding all matters
that could materially affect the risk
profile of ICE Clear Credit, consistent
with the requirements of Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’)
regulations.4 The amendment would
clarify that the role of the working group
is advisory, such that neither the Board
nor the Risk Committee is required to
accept or act upon any proposal of the
working group. The members of the Risk
Advisory Working Group would include
a minimum of two representatives of
Participants and a minimum of two
representatives of Non-Participant
Parties. While Rule 509 would provide
for a minimum number of Participant
and Non-Participant Party members on
the Risk Advisory Working Group, Rule
509 provides the flexibility for more
4 See
E:\FR\FM\05SEN1.SGM
17 CFR 39.24(b)(12).
05SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 172 (Thursday, September 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72537-72538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100880; File No. SR-CBOE-2024-008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To
Adopt a New Rule Regarding Order and Execution Management Systems
August 30, 2024.
On February 13, 2024, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposal to adopt a new rule
regarding order and execution management systems. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 5,
2024.\3\ The Commission has received comment letters regarding the
proposed rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99620 (February 28,
2024), 89 FR 15907 (``Notice'').
\4\ The public comment file for SR-CBOE-2024-008 is available on
the Commission's website at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2024-008/srcboe2024008.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 16, 2024, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change.\6\ On May 31, 2024, the Commission instituted proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \7\ to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99963 (April 16,
2024), 89 FR 29389 (April 22, 2024).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100056 (May 31,
2024), 89 FR 48463 (June 6, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \9\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change.
The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate
and
[[Page 72538]]
publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 5, 2024.\10\
The 180th day after publication of the proposed rule change is
September 1, 2024. The Commission is extending the time period for
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change for an additional 60
days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\10\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change and the issues raised therein. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\11\ designates
October 31, 2024, as the date by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CBOE-2024-
008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-19950 Filed 9-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P