Certain Glass Wine Bottles From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duy Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 68395-68397 [2024-19069]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Notices
• Which markets, given shifting
regulatory and policy landscapes,
present the most promising commercial
environments for adopting AI in the
biopharmaceutical industry, from your
experience?
• How do you assess the potential for
public-private partnerships (P3s) to
support efforts in the healthcare sector
to adopt AI in the development and
commercialization of
biopharmaceuticals in global markets?
What would a successful P3 in this
space look like?
• What kinds of strategic
international engagements do you
believe would be most effective in
creating a more conducive environment
for the U.S. biopharmaceutical industry
to adopt AI and strengthen its
competitiveness in overseas markets?
• What kinds of trade barriers are you
seeing or anticipating that might
negatively affect U.S. competitiveness?
Where do you encounter these barriers?
How do you think the barriers can be
reduced, removed, or prevented?
Æ What are the implications of
regulations and policies around health
data in foreign markets for adoption of
AI in the U.S. biopharmaceutical
industry?
Æ What are the implications of how
foreign governments are addressing
intellectual property considerations in
relation to AI-assisted drug
development?
The event is closed to press and the
public. Industry participation is limited
to a maximum of 20 qualifying industry
representatives.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Selection
To attend, participants should submit
the below information to HealthAI@
trade.gov by no later than 10/9/2024.
ITA will evaluate registrations based on
the submitted information (and based
on the criteria below) on a rolling basis
until a maximum of 20 participants
have been selected for each roundtable
and inform applicants of selection
decisions.
Applicants are encouraged to send
representatives at a sufficiently senior
level to be knowledgeable about their
company’s capabilities, interests, and
challenges in the global AI in healthcare
market. Due to time constraints, there is
a limit of one person to speak on behalf
of each company.
Applicants should include the
following information in their response
email:
• Name of attendee and short bio.
• Name of company and brief
company description.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
• A statement self-certifying how the
company meets each of the following
criteria:
1. It is not majority owned by a
foreign government entity (or entities).
2. It is an existing provider or
prospective new market entrant, of
biopharmaceuticals that are or will be
produced in the United States and that
feature use of AI/ML in one or more of
the following business areas: drug
discovery/development (e.g., target
identification, disease modeling, de
novo drug design, pre-clinical
development), clinical trials (e.g. patient
recruitment, trial design), drug
manufacturing (e.g., process
optimization, drug synthesis and
formulation), and supply chain
management (e.g., predictive modeling,
demand forecasting).
3. The representative will be able to
attend the entire roundtable.
Selection will be based on the
following criteria:
• The company’s production or
production plans with respect to AI in
drug discovery/development, clinical
trials, drug manufacturing, and supply
chain management.
• The company’s experience in
leveraging AI to produce
biopharmaceuticals that are exported
from the United States to overseas
markets.
• Suitability of the representative’s
position and biography to be able to
engage in the conversation.
• Ability of the company to
contribute to the roundtable’s purpose
of seeking individual input and views
on policies and initiatives that
strengthen U.S. industry
competitiveness of U.S. exports.
Dated: August 20, 2024.
Amanda Lawrence,
Acting Director, Office of Health Industries,
International Trade Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024–19039 Filed 8–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
68395
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
certain glass wine bottles (wine bottles)
from the People’s Republic of China
(China). The period of investigation is
January 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022.
DATES:
Applicable August 26, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Preston Cox, Scarlet Jaldin, or Theodora
Mattei, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5041,
(202) 482–4275, or (202) 482–4834,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 28, 2024, Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register
and invited interested parties to
comment.1 Subsequently, on July 23,
2024, Commerce issued its PostPreliminary Analysis.2 For a complete
description of the events that followed
the Preliminary Determination, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are wine bottles from
China. For a complete description of the
scope of this investigation, see
Appendix I.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–163]
Certain Glass Wine Bottles From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duy
Determination and Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical
Circumstances
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Certain Glass Wine Bottles from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and Preliminary
Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances, 89 FR 47533 (June 3, 2024)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Post-Preliminary Decision
Memorandum for the Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Certain Glass Wine Bottles from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated July 23, 2024
(Post-Preliminary Analysis).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
Determination in the Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Certain Glass Wine Bottles from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently
with, and herby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
68396
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Notices
Scope Comments
Verification
During the course of this
investigation, Commerce received scope
comments from parties. Commerce
issued a Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum to address these
comments and set aside a period of time
for parties to address scope issues in
scope-specific case and rebuttal briefs.4
We received comments from parties on
the Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum, which we address in the
Final Scope Decision Memorandum.5
We did not make any changes to the
scope of the investigation from the
scope published in the Preliminary
Determination, as noted in Appendix I.
Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information
relied on in making its final
determination in this investigation.
However, in June and July 2024, we
took additional steps in lieu of on-site
verification to verify the information
relied upon in making this final
determination, in accordance with
section 782(i) of the Act, by conducting
virtual verification of Shandong
Changyu Glass Co., Ltd. (Shandong
Changyu).8 Yantai Prime Packaging Co.,
Ltd. (YPP) notified Commerce of its
intent not to participate in a virtual
verification.9
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination and Post-Preliminary
Analysis
The subsidy programs under
investigation, and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs that were
submitted by parties in this
investigation, are discussed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. For a list of
the issues raised by interested parties
and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, see Appendix II
to this notice.
Methodology
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Commerce conducted this
investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found to be
countervailable, Commerce determines
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.6 For a
full description of the methodology
underlying our final determination, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
In making this final determination,
Commerce relied, in part, on facts
otherwise available, including with an
adverse inference, pursuant to sections
776(a) and (b) of the Act. For a full
discussion of our application of adverse
facts available, see the Preliminary
Determination 7 and the Issues and
Decision Memorandum at the section
entitled ‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise
Available and Application of Adverse
Inferences.’’
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated May 28, 2024 (Preliminary
Scope Decision Memorandum).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Scope Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Final Scope Decision Memorandum).
6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
7 See Preliminary Determination PDM at 8–36.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
Based on our review and analysis of
the information received at verification,
for this final determination, we made
certain changes to the countervailable
subsidy rate calculations for Shandong
Changyu. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Final Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
Pursuant to sections 705(a)(2), 776(a),
and 776(b) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.206, Commerce finds that critical
circumstances exist with respect to
imports of wine bottles from China for
Shandong Changyu, YPP, all other
producers and/or exporters, and the
non-responsive companies. For further
information on Commerce’s critical
circumstances analysis, see the section
‘‘Final Critical Circumstances
Determination’’ in the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of
the Act, Commerce will determine an
all-others rate equal to the weightedaverage countervailable subsidy rates
established for exporters and/or
producers individually examined,
excluding any rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely under section
776 of the Act. In this investigation,
Commerce calculated an individual
estimated countervailable subsidy rate
for Shandong Changyu, the only
individually-examined exporter/
producer in this investigation for which
Commerce is calculating an estimated
countervailable subsidy rate. Because
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Report on Verification of
Shandong Changyu Glass Co., Ltd. and Its
Affiliates,’’ dated July 15, 2024.
9 See YPP’s Letter, ‘‘Notification of NonParticipation,’’ dated June 18, 2024.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the only individually calculated rate is
not zero, de minimis, or based entirely
on facts otherwise available, the
estimated countervailable subsidy rate
calculated for Shandong Changyu is the
rate assigned to all other producers and
exporters, pursuant to section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act.
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the
following estimated countervailable
subsidy rates exist:
Company
Shandong Changyu Glass
Co., Ltd.10 ...........................
Boliva International Limited ....
Bright Glassware ....................
Shandong Dingxin Electronic
Wenden Wensheng Glass
Co., Ltd ...............................
Wuixi Hua Zhong Glass Co.
Ltd .......................................
Xiamen Jane Jonson Co. Ltd
Yamamura Glass
Qinhuangdao .......................
Yantai Prime Packaging Co.,
Ltd .......................................
Zibo Regal Glass Products
Co. Ltd ................................
All Others ................................
Subsidy
rate
(percent
ad valorem)
21.31
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
* 212.58
21.31
* Rate based on adverse facts available.11
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with this final
determination within five days of its
public announcement or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days
of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Suspension of Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary
Determination, and pursuant to sections
703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act,
Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash
deposits and suspend liquidation of
entries of subject merchandise as
described in the scope of the
investigation section entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after June 3, 2024,
the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination in the
10 Commerce finds that Shandong Changyu is
cross-owned with Yantai Changyu Glass Co., Ltd.;
Yantai Changyu Investment Co., Ltd.; Yantai
Changyu Glass Printing Co., Ltd.; Yantai Changyu
Fuel Co., Ltd.; and Yantai Changyu Storage and
Transportation Co., Ltd.
11 See Memorandum, ‘‘AFA Calculation
Memorandum for the Final Determination,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 165 / Monday, August 26, 2024 / Notices
Federal Register. Because we
preliminarily determined that critical
circumstances existed with respect to
Shandong Changyu, all other producers
and/or exporters, and the nonresponsive companies, we instructed
CBP to suspend such entries on or after
March 5, 2024, which is 90 days prior
to the date of the publication of the
Preliminary Determination in the
Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 705(c)(1)(B)(ii) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(d) where
appropriate, Commerce will instruct
CBP to require a cash deposit equal to
the estimated individual countervailable
subsidy rate or the estimated all-others
rate, as indicated in the chart above,
effective on the date of publication of
this final determination.
If the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we
will issue a countervailing duty order,
and require a cash deposit of estimated
countervailing duties for such entries of
subject merchandise in the amounts
indicated above, in accordance with
section 706(a) of the Act. If the ITC
determines that material injury, or
threat of material injury, does not exist,
this proceeding will be terminated, and
all estimated duties deposited or
securities posted as a result of the
suspension of liquidation will be
refunded or cancelled.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, Commerce will notify the ITC
of its final affirmative determination
that countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
wine bottles from China. As
Commerce’s final determination is
affirmative, in accordance with section
705(b) of the Act, the ITC will
determine, within 45 days, whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports of
wine bottles from China. In addition, we
are making available to the ITC all nonprivileged and non-proprietary
information in our files, provided the
ITC confirms that it will not disclose
such information, either publicly or
under administrative protective order
(APO), without the written consent of
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Administrative Protective Order
In the event that the ITC issues a final
negative injury determination, this
notice will serve as the only reminder
to parties subject to the APO of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Aug 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
68397
disclosed under APO, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
stelvin (screw cap), crown cap, or wire cage
and cork closure).
Glass bottles subject to the investigation
are specified within the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under
subheading 7010.90.5019. The HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes only. The written
description of the scope of the investigation
is dispositive.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 705(d)
and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
Appendix II
Dated: August 19, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by the
investigation is certain narrow neck glass
bottles, with a nominal capacity of 740
milliliters (25.02 ounces) to 760 milliliters
(25.70 ounces); a nominal total height
between 24.8 centimeters (9.75 inches) to
35.6 centimeters (14 inches); a nominal base
diameter between 4.6 centimeters (1.8
inches) to 11.4 centimeters (4.5 inches); and
a mouth with an outer diameter of between
25 millimeters (.98 inches) to 37.9
millimeters (1.5 inches); frequently referred
to as a ‘‘wine bottle.’’ In scope merchandise
may include but is not limited to the
following shapes: Bordeaux (also known as
‘‘Claret’’), Burgundy, Hock, Champagne,
Sparkling, Port, Provence, or Alsace (also
known as ‘‘Germanic’’). In scope glass bottles
generally have an approximately round base
and have shapes including but not limited to,
straight-sided, a tapered slope from shoulder
(i.e., the sloping part of the bottle between
the neck and the body) to base, or a long neck
with sloping shoulders to a wider base. The
scope includes glass bottles, whether or not
clear, whether or not colored, with or
without a punt (i.e., an indentation on the
underside of the bottle), and with or without
design or functional enhancements
(including, but not limited to, embossing,
labeling, or etching). In scope merchandise is
made of non-‘‘free blown’’ glass, i.e., in scope
merchandise is produced with the use of a
mold and is distinguished by mold seams,
joint marks, or parting lines. In scope
merchandise is unfilled and may be imported
with or without a closure, including a cork,
stelvin (screw cap), crown cap, or wire cage
and cork closure.
Excluded from the scope of the
investigation are: (1) glass containers made of
borosilicate glass, meeting United States
Pharmacopeia requirements for Type 1
pharmaceutical containers; and (2) glass
containers without a ‘‘finish’’ (i.e., the
section of a container at the opening
including the lip and ring or collar, threaded
or otherwise compatible with a type of
closure, including but not limited to a cork,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Application of Adverse Inferences
V. Final Critical Circumstances
Determination
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should
Find that Shandong Changyu Used the
Export Buyer’s Credit (EBC) Program as
Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Find Shandong Changyu Uncreditworthy
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Find Countervailable the Provision of
Natural Gas for Less Than Adequate
Remuneration (LTAR) Program
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Conduct an On-site Verification
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should
Attribute to Shandong Changyu
Countervailable Subsidies Received by
Shandong Changyu’s Cross-Owned
Affiliates
Comment 6: Whether the Application of
AFA to the Provision of Electricity for
LTAR is Appropriate
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should
Find, based on AFA, that Shandong
Changyu Used the Silica Sand for LTAR
Program
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should
Find, based on AFA, that Shandong
Changyu Used Other Subsidies
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
Apply Total AFA to Shandong Changyu
for Its Reporting of Policy Loans to the
Wine Bottles Industry Program
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–19069 Filed 8–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Request for Public Comment on NOAA
Commercial Data Buys Guidance
Office of the Chief Information
Officer (OCIO), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for information
(RFI).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 165 (Monday, August 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68395-68397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-19069]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-163]
Certain Glass Wine Bottles From the People's Republic of China:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duy Determination and Final
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters
of certain glass wine bottles (wine bottles) from the People's Republic
of China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2022,
through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable August 26, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston Cox, Scarlet Jaldin, or
Theodora Mattei, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-5041, (202) 482-4275, or (202) 482-4834, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 28, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination
in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to comment.\1\
Subsequently, on July 23, 2024, Commerce issued its Post-Preliminary
Analysis.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the
Preliminary Determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Glass Wine Bottles from the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 89
FR 47533 (June 3, 2024) (Preliminary Determination), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Decision Memorandum for
the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Glass Wine Bottles
from the People's Republic of China,'' dated July 23, 2024 (Post-
Preliminary Analysis).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Affirmative Determination in the Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Certain Glass Wine Bottles from the People's
Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with, and herby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are wine bottles from
China. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation,
see Appendix I.
[[Page 68396]]
Scope Comments
During the course of this investigation, Commerce received scope
comments from parties. Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum to address these comments and set aside a period of time for
parties to address scope issues in scope-specific case and rebuttal
briefs.\4\ We received comments from parties on the Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum, which we address in the Final Scope Decision
Memorandum.\5\ We did not make any changes to the scope of the
investigation from the scope published in the Preliminary
Determination, as noted in Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,''
dated May 28, 2024 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Final Scope Decision Memorandum,'' dated
concurrently with this notice (Final Scope Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
The subsidy programs under investigation, and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs that were submitted by parties in this
investigation, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. For
a list of the issues raised by interested parties and addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, see Appendix II to this notice.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found to be countervailable, Commerce determines that
there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority''
that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.\6\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our
final determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In making this final determination, Commerce relied, in part, on
facts otherwise available, including with an adverse inference,
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For a full discussion
of our application of adverse facts available, see the Preliminary
Determination \7\ and the Issues and Decision Memorandum at the section
entitled ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse
Inferences.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at 8-36.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
Commerce was unable to conduct on-site verification of the
information relied on in making its final determination in this
investigation. However, in June and July 2024, we took additional steps
in lieu of on-site verification to verify the information relied upon
in making this final determination, in accordance with section 782(i)
of the Act, by conducting virtual verification of Shandong Changyu
Glass Co., Ltd. (Shandong Changyu).\8\ Yantai Prime Packaging Co., Ltd.
(YPP) notified Commerce of its intent not to participate in a virtual
verification.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Report on Verification of Shandong Changyu
Glass Co., Ltd. and Its Affiliates,'' dated July 15, 2024.
\9\ See YPP's Letter, ``Notification of Non-Participation,''
dated June 18, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination and Post-Preliminary
Analysis
Based on our review and analysis of the information received at
verification, for this final determination, we made certain changes to
the countervailable subsidy rate calculations for Shandong Changyu. For
a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances
Pursuant to sections 705(a)(2), 776(a), and 776(b) of the Act, and
19 CFR 351.206, Commerce finds that critical circumstances exist with
respect to imports of wine bottles from China for Shandong Changyu,
YPP, all other producers and/or exporters, and the non-responsive
companies. For further information on Commerce's critical circumstances
analysis, see the section ``Final Critical Circumstances
Determination'' in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, Commerce will
determine an all-others rate equal to the weighted-average
countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and/or
producers individually examined, excluding any rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely under section 776 of the Act. In this
investigation, Commerce calculated an individual estimated
countervailable subsidy rate for Shandong Changyu, the only
individually-examined exporter/producer in this investigation for which
Commerce is calculating an estimated countervailable subsidy rate.
Because the only individually calculated rate is not zero, de minimis,
or based entirely on facts otherwise available, the estimated
countervailable subsidy rate calculated for Shandong Changyu is the
rate assigned to all other producers and exporters, pursuant to section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act.
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the following estimated countervailable
subsidy rates exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Company (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shandong Changyu Glass Co., Ltd.\10\...................... 21.31
Boliva International Limited.............................. * 212.58
Bright Glassware.......................................... * 212.58
Shandong Dingxin Electronic............................... * 212.58
Wenden Wensheng Glass Co., Ltd............................ * 212.58
Wuixi Hua Zhong Glass Co. Ltd............................. * 212.58
Xiamen Jane Jonson Co. Ltd................................ * 212.58
Yamamura Glass Qinhuangdao................................ * 212.58
Yantai Prime Packaging Co., Ltd........................... * 212.58
Zibo Regal Glass Products Co. Ltd......................... * 212.58
All Others................................................ 21.31
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rate based on adverse facts available.\11\
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with this final determination within five days
of its public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Commerce finds that Shandong Changyu is cross-owned with
Yantai Changyu Glass Co., Ltd.; Yantai Changyu Investment Co., Ltd.;
Yantai Changyu Glass Printing Co., Ltd.; Yantai Changyu Fuel Co.,
Ltd.; and Yantai Changyu Storage and Transportation Co., Ltd.
\11\ See Memorandum, ``AFA Calculation Memorandum for the Final
Determination,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary Determination, and pursuant to
sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, Commerce instructed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits and
suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise as described in
the scope of the investigation section entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after June 3, 2024, the date of
publication of the Preliminary Determination in the
[[Page 68397]]
Federal Register. Because we preliminarily determined that critical
circumstances existed with respect to Shandong Changyu, all other
producers and/or exporters, and the non-responsive companies, we
instructed CBP to suspend such entries on or after March 5, 2024, which
is 90 days prior to the date of the publication of the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 705(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.210(d) where appropriate, Commerce will instruct CBP to require a
cash deposit equal to the estimated individual countervailable subsidy
rate or the estimated all-others rate, as indicated in the chart above,
effective on the date of publication of this final determination.
If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we will issue a countervailing duty
order, and require a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties
for such entries of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above,
in accordance with section 706(a) of the Act. If the ITC determines
that material injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist,
this proceeding will be terminated, and all estimated duties deposited
or securities posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will
be refunded or cancelled.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the ITC of its final affirmative determination that countervailable
subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of wine bottles
from China. As Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in
accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will determine,
within 45 days, whether the domestic industry in the United States is
materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of
imports of wine bottles from China. In addition, we are making
available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information
in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such
information, either publicly or under administrative protective order
(APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Administrative Protective Order
In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury
determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties
subject to the APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction
of proprietary information disclosed under APO, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: August 19, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by the investigation is certain narrow
neck glass bottles, with a nominal capacity of 740 milliliters
(25.02 ounces) to 760 milliliters (25.70 ounces); a nominal total
height between 24.8 centimeters (9.75 inches) to 35.6 centimeters
(14 inches); a nominal base diameter between 4.6 centimeters (1.8
inches) to 11.4 centimeters (4.5 inches); and a mouth with an outer
diameter of between 25 millimeters (.98 inches) to 37.9 millimeters
(1.5 inches); frequently referred to as a ``wine bottle.'' In scope
merchandise may include but is not limited to the following shapes:
Bordeaux (also known as ``Claret''), Burgundy, Hock, Champagne,
Sparkling, Port, Provence, or Alsace (also known as ``Germanic'').
In scope glass bottles generally have an approximately round base
and have shapes including but not limited to, straight-sided, a
tapered slope from shoulder (i.e., the sloping part of the bottle
between the neck and the body) to base, or a long neck with sloping
shoulders to a wider base. The scope includes glass bottles, whether
or not clear, whether or not colored, with or without a punt (i.e.,
an indentation on the underside of the bottle), and with or without
design or functional enhancements (including, but not limited to,
embossing, labeling, or etching). In scope merchandise is made of
non-``free blown'' glass, i.e., in scope merchandise is produced
with the use of a mold and is distinguished by mold seams, joint
marks, or parting lines. In scope merchandise is unfilled and may be
imported with or without a closure, including a cork, stelvin (screw
cap), crown cap, or wire cage and cork closure.
Excluded from the scope of the investigation are: (1) glass
containers made of borosilicate glass, meeting United States
Pharmacopeia requirements for Type 1 pharmaceutical containers; and
(2) glass containers without a ``finish'' (i.e., the section of a
container at the opening including the lip and ring or collar,
threaded or otherwise compatible with a type of closure, including
but not limited to a cork, stelvin (screw cap), crown cap, or wire
cage and cork closure).
Glass bottles subject to the investigation are specified within
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under
subheading 7010.90.5019. The HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of
the scope of the investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse
Inferences
V. Final Critical Circumstances Determination
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Find that Shandong Changyu
Used the Export Buyer's Credit (EBC) Program as Adverse Facts
Available (AFA)
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Find Shandong Changyu
Uncreditworthy
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Find Countervailable the
Provision of Natural Gas for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR)
Program
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Conduct an On-site
Verification
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Attribute to Shandong Changyu
Countervailable Subsidies Received by Shandong Changyu's Cross-Owned
Affiliates
Comment 6: Whether the Application of AFA to the Provision of
Electricity for LTAR is Appropriate
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Find, based on AFA, that
Shandong Changyu Used the Silica Sand for LTAR Program
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Find, based on AFA, that
Shandong Changyu Used Other Subsidies
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total AFA to Shandong
Changyu for Its Reporting of Policy Loans to the Wine Bottles
Industry Program
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-19069 Filed 8-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P