Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022; Correction, 67071-67072 [2024-18516]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
219. Triad Forest Products Ltd.
220. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
221. Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
222. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
223. Usine Sartigan Inc.
224. Vaagen Fibre Canada ULC
225. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products
Ltd.
226. Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products
Ltd.
227. Vanderwell Contractors (1971) Ltd.
228. Visscher Lumber Inc.
229. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
230. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
231. West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
232. West Coast Panel Cutters
233. Western Forest Products Inc.
234. Western Lumber Sales Limited
235. Westminster Industries Ltd.
236. Weston Forest Products Inc.
237. Westrend Exteriors Inc
238. Weyerhaeuser Co.
239. White River Forest Products L.P.
240. Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
241. Woodtone Specialties Inc.
Appendix III
List of Companies Rescinded From the
Review
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. 54 Reman
2. 9224–5737 Quebec Inc.; A.G. Bois 23
3. AA Trading Ltd.
4. All American Forest Products Inc.
5. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.;
Anglo-American Cedar Products Ltd.
6. Bardobec Inc.
7. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
8. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co. Ltd.
9. Canada Pallet Corp.
10. Canasia Forest Industries Ltd.
11. Careau Bois inc.
12. CarlWood Lumber Ltd.24
13. Cedar Island Forest Products Ltd.
14. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
15. Cedarcoast Lumber Products
16. CHAP Alliance, Inc.
17. CNH Products Inc.
18. Coast Clear Wood Ltd.
19. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
20. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); Comox
Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd.25
21. CWP—Montreal Inc.
22. DH Manufacturing Inc.
23. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
24. Distribution Rioux Inc.
25. Elrod Cartage Ltd.
26. Glandell Enterprises Inc.
27. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
28. GreenFirst Forest Products Inc.
29. Groupe Lignarex Inc.
30. Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc.
31. Imperial Cedar Products Ltd.
23 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name 224–
5737 Quebec Inc. (aka A.G. Bois) referred to in the
Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
24 CarlWood Lumber Ltd. is referred to in the ACE
module as Carl Wood Lumber Ltd.
25 ‘‘AKA’’ has been removed from the name
Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); AKA Comox
Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd. referred to in the
Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
32. Intertran Holdings Ltd.; Richmond
Terminal 26
33. Island Cedar Products Ltd.
34. Les Bardeaux Lajoie Inc.
35. Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc.
36. Les Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc.; Sitka
Forest Products Inc.27
37. Lumber Assets Holding LP
38. Mainland Sawmill, a division of Terminal
Forest Products
39. Metrie Canada Ltd.
40. Modern Terminal Ltd.
41. Nagaard Sawmill Ltd.
42. Nickel Lake Lumber
43. NSC Lumber Ltd.
44. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd.
45. Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc.
46. Pacific Pallet Ltd.
47. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
48. Rick Dubois
49. S&W Forest Products Ltd.
50. Sapphire Lumber Company
51. Smartlam LLC
52. Sonora Logging Ltd.
53. Source Forest Products
54. South Coast Reman Ltd.; Southcoast
Millwork Ltd.
55. South Fraser Container Terminals
56. Star Lumber Canada Ltd.
57. Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd.
58. Surplus G Rioux
59. Swiftwood Forest Products Ltd.
60. T&P Trucking Ltd.
61. Temrex Forest Products LP; Produits
Forestiers Temrex SEC.
62. Valley Cedar 2 Inc.
63. Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
64. Western Timber Products, Inc.
65. Winton Homes Ltd.
66. Woodstock Forest Products
67. WWW Timber Products Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024–18443 Filed 8–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results and Final
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022; Correction
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
26 ‘‘dba’’ has been removed from the name
Intertran Holdings Ltd. (dba Richmond Terminal)
referred to in the Preliminary Results at the request
of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 10.
27 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name Les
Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc. (aka Sitka Forest
Products Inc.) referred to in the Preliminary Results,
at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 10.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67071
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) published in the
Federal Register of July 5, 2024, notice
of the final results of the 2021–2022
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
whether or not assembled into modules
(solar cells), from the People’s Republic
of China (China). In that notice,
Commerce incorrectly identified the
companies which it found were not
entitled to a separate rate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dakota Potts or Paola Aleman Ordaz,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223
and (202) 482–4031, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On July 5, 2024, Commerce published
in the Federal Register notice of the
final results of the 2021–2022
administrative review of the AD order
on solar cells from China.1 In that
notice, Commerce incorrectly identified
the companies which it found were not
entitled to a separate rate. Commerce
preliminarily found that only four
companies did not qualify for a separate
rate.2 Commerce did not change that
determination in the final results of the
review. Yet, in the final results of
review Federal Register notice,
Commerce inadvertently stated that:
{i}n the Preliminary Results, Commerce
found that 35 companies for which a
review was initiated did not establish
their eligibility for a separate rate. No
parties contested this finding (see
discussion regarding the Yingli single
entity below). As such, we continue to
determine these 35 companies
identified in Appendix III are part of the
China-wide entity.3
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
did not determine that the 31 companies
that it incorrectly added to Appendix III
1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; and Final Determination of
No Shipments; 2021–2022, 89 FR 55562 (July 5,
2024) (Final Results).
2 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review,
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments;
2021–2022, 89 FR 457, 458–59 (January 4, 2024)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
3 See Final Results, 89 FR at 55563.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
67072
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
of the Final Results are ineligible for a
separate rate. Rather, in the Preliminary
Results, Commerce determined that the
31 companies did not have suspended
entries of subject merchandise during
the period of review (POR).4 Commerce
did not change its preliminary decision
with respect to these 31 companies in
the final results of review. Therefore,
the following corrections are required.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Correction
AGENCY:
In the Federal Register of July 5,
2024, in FR Doc 2024–14763, on page
55563, in the first column, under the
heading ‘‘China-Wide Entity,’’ correct
the first sentence to read: ‘‘In the
Preliminary Results, Commerce found
that four companies for which a review
was initiated did not establish their
eligibility for a separate rate.’’ 5 In
addition, on page 55563, in the first
column, under the heading ‘‘ChinaWide Entity,’’ correct the third sentence
to read: ‘‘As such, we continue to
determine these four companies
identified in Appendix III are part of the
China-wide entity.’’ Further, on page
55564, in the third column, under the
heading ‘‘Appendix III Companies
Determined To Be Part of the ChinaWide Entity,’’ correct the list to include
only the following companies:
1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.
2. Maodi Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co.,
Ltd.
3. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources
Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic
Technology Co. Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing
Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co.,
Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources
Co., Ltd.; Hengshui Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; and Yingli
Energy (China) Company Limited (Yingli
Energy China).
4. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
Notification to Interested Parties
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–18516 Filed 8–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
4 See
Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 4548.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
International Trade Administration
[A–428–847]
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From
Germany: Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain producers/exporters subject to
this administrative review made sales of
forged steel fluid end blocks (fluid end
blocks) from Germany at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR) January 1, 2022, through
December 31, 2022.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable August 19, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order
is fluid end blocks from Germany.4 For
a complete description of the scope of
the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this
review are listed in an appendix to this
notice and addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Commerce evaluated the comments in
the case and rebuttal briefs and record
evidence and made no changes from the
Preliminary Results. For a discussion of
the comments, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Background
Final Results of Review
Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3148.
On February 7, 2024, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of this
administrative review.1 We invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. A summary of the
events that occurred since Commerce
published the Preliminary Results, as
well as a full discussion of the issues
raised by parties for these final results,
are discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted
this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). On July 23, 2024,
Commerce tolled certain deadlines in
this administrative proceeding by seven
days.3 The deadline for the final results
of this administrative review is now
August 9, 2024.
1 See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from
Germany: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part;
2022, 89 FR 8409 (February 7, 2024) (Preliminary
Results).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Forged Steel Fluid End
Blocks from Germany; 2022,’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commerce determines that the
following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
January 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022:
Producer/exporter
BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH ....
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
19.96
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose the
calculations performed in connection
with the final results to parties in this
proceeding within five days of the date
of public announcement, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
because we have made no changes from
the Preliminary Results, there are no
new calculations to disclose.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
4 See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the
Federal Republic of Germany and Italy: Amended
Final Antidumping Duty Determination for the
Federal Republic of Germany and Antidumping
Duty Orders, 86 FR 7528 (January 29, 2021) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67071-67072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18516]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and
Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022; Correction
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published in the
Federal Register of July 5, 2024, notice of the final results of the
2021-2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into
modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (China). In
that notice, Commerce incorrectly identified the companies which it
found were not entitled to a separate rate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dakota Potts or Paola Aleman Ordaz,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0223 and (202)
482-4031, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 5, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register notice
of the final results of the 2021-2022 administrative review of the AD
order on solar cells from China.\1\ In that notice, Commerce
incorrectly identified the companies which it found were not entitled
to a separate rate. Commerce preliminarily found that only four
companies did not qualify for a separate rate.\2\ Commerce did not
change that determination in the final results of the review. Yet, in
the final results of review Federal Register notice, Commerce
inadvertently stated that: {i{time} n the Preliminary Results, Commerce
found that 35 companies for which a review was initiated did not
establish their eligibility for a separate rate. No parties contested
this finding (see discussion regarding the Yingli single entity below).
As such, we continue to determine these 35 companies identified in
Appendix III are part of the China-wide entity.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final
Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; and Final Determination of No Shipments;
2021-2022, 89 FR 55562 (July 5, 2024) (Final Results).
\2\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 89 FR 457,
458-59 (January 4, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\3\ See Final Results, 89 FR at 55563.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce did not determine that the 31
companies that it incorrectly added to Appendix III
[[Page 67072]]
of the Final Results are ineligible for a separate rate. Rather, in the
Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that the 31 companies did not
have suspended entries of subject merchandise during the period of
review (POR).\4\ Commerce did not change its preliminary decision with
respect to these 31 companies in the final results of review.
Therefore, the following corrections are required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 4548.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Correction
In the Federal Register of July 5, 2024, in FR Doc 2024-14763, on
page 55563, in the first column, under the heading ``China-Wide
Entity,'' correct the first sentence to read: ``In the Preliminary
Results, Commerce found that four companies for which a review was
initiated did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate.''
\5\ In addition, on page 55563, in the first column, under the heading
``China-Wide Entity,'' correct the third sentence to read: ``As such,
we continue to determine these four companies identified in Appendix
III are part of the China-wide entity.'' Further, on page 55564, in the
third column, under the heading ``Appendix III Companies Determined To
Be Part of the China-Wide Entity,'' correct the list to include only
the following companies:
1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
2. Maodi Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
3. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding
Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co. Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co.,
Ltd.; and Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited (Yingli Energy
China).
4. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-18516 Filed 8-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P