Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022; Correction, 67071-67072 [2024-18516]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices 219. Triad Forest Products Ltd. 220. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. 221. Tyee Timber Products Ltd. 222. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd. 223. Usine Sartigan Inc. 224. Vaagen Fibre Canada ULC 225. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. 226. Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products Ltd. 227. Vanderwell Contractors (1971) Ltd. 228. Visscher Lumber Inc. 229. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. 230. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. 231. West Bay Forest Products Ltd. 232. West Coast Panel Cutters 233. Western Forest Products Inc. 234. Western Lumber Sales Limited 235. Westminster Industries Ltd. 236. Weston Forest Products Inc. 237. Westrend Exteriors Inc 238. Weyerhaeuser Co. 239. White River Forest Products L.P. 240. Woodline Forest Products Ltd. 241. Woodtone Specialties Inc. Appendix III List of Companies Rescinded From the Review ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 1. 54 Reman 2. 9224–5737 Quebec Inc.; A.G. Bois 23 3. AA Trading Ltd. 4. All American Forest Products Inc. 5. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.; Anglo-American Cedar Products Ltd. 6. Bardobec Inc. 7. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd. 8. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co. Ltd. 9. Canada Pallet Corp. 10. Canasia Forest Industries Ltd. 11. Careau Bois inc. 12. CarlWood Lumber Ltd.24 13. Cedar Island Forest Products Ltd. 14. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd. 15. Cedarcoast Lumber Products 16. CHAP Alliance, Inc. 17. CNH Products Inc. 18. Coast Clear Wood Ltd. 19. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd. 20. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); Comox Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd.25 21. CWP—Montreal Inc. 22. DH Manufacturing Inc. 23. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd. 24. Distribution Rioux Inc. 25. Elrod Cartage Ltd. 26. Glandell Enterprises Inc. 27. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd. 28. GreenFirst Forest Products Inc. 29. Groupe Lignarex Inc. 30. Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc. 31. Imperial Cedar Products Ltd. 23 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name 224– 5737 Quebec Inc. (aka A.G. Bois) referred to in the Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10. 24 CarlWood Lumber Ltd. is referred to in the ACE module as Carl Wood Lumber Ltd. 25 ‘‘AKA’’ has been removed from the name Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); AKA Comox Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd. referred to in the Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Aug 16, 2024 Jkt 262001 32. Intertran Holdings Ltd.; Richmond Terminal 26 33. Island Cedar Products Ltd. 34. Les Bardeaux Lajoie Inc. 35. Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc. 36. Les Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc.; Sitka Forest Products Inc.27 37. Lumber Assets Holding LP 38. Mainland Sawmill, a division of Terminal Forest Products 39. Metrie Canada Ltd. 40. Modern Terminal Ltd. 41. Nagaard Sawmill Ltd. 42. Nickel Lake Lumber 43. NSC Lumber Ltd. 44. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd. 45. Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc. 46. Pacific Pallet Ltd. 47. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation 48. Rick Dubois 49. S&W Forest Products Ltd. 50. Sapphire Lumber Company 51. Smartlam LLC 52. Sonora Logging Ltd. 53. Source Forest Products 54. South Coast Reman Ltd.; Southcoast Millwork Ltd. 55. South Fraser Container Terminals 56. Star Lumber Canada Ltd. 57. Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd. 58. Surplus G Rioux 59. Swiftwood Forest Products Ltd. 60. T&P Trucking Ltd. 61. Temrex Forest Products LP; Produits Forestiers Temrex SEC. 62. Valley Cedar 2 Inc. 63. Watkins Sawmills Ltd. 64. Western Timber Products, Inc. 65. Winton Homes Ltd. 66. Woodstock Forest Products 67. WWW Timber Products Ltd. [FR Doc. 2024–18443 Filed 8–16–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–979] Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021– 2022; Correction Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice; correction. AGENCY: 26 ‘‘dba’’ has been removed from the name Intertran Holdings Ltd. (dba Richmond Terminal) referred to in the Preliminary Results at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10. 27 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name Les Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc. (aka Sitka Forest Products Inc.) referred to in the Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 67071 The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published in the Federal Register of July 5, 2024, notice of the final results of the 2021–2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the People’s Republic of China (China). In that notice, Commerce incorrectly identified the companies which it found were not entitled to a separate rate. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dakota Potts or Paola Aleman Ordaz, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223 and (202) 482–4031, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On July 5, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register notice of the final results of the 2021–2022 administrative review of the AD order on solar cells from China.1 In that notice, Commerce incorrectly identified the companies which it found were not entitled to a separate rate. Commerce preliminarily found that only four companies did not qualify for a separate rate.2 Commerce did not change that determination in the final results of the review. Yet, in the final results of review Federal Register notice, Commerce inadvertently stated that: {i}n the Preliminary Results, Commerce found that 35 companies for which a review was initiated did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate. No parties contested this finding (see discussion regarding the Yingli single entity below). As such, we continue to determine these 35 companies identified in Appendix III are part of the China-wide entity.3 In the Preliminary Results, Commerce did not determine that the 31 companies that it incorrectly added to Appendix III 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022, 89 FR 55562 (July 5, 2024) (Final Results). 2 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022, 89 FR 457, 458–59 (January 4, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 3 See Final Results, 89 FR at 55563. E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM 19AUN1 67072 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices of the Final Results are ineligible for a separate rate. Rather, in the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that the 31 companies did not have suspended entries of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR).4 Commerce did not change its preliminary decision with respect to these 31 companies in the final results of review. Therefore, the following corrections are required. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Correction AGENCY: In the Federal Register of July 5, 2024, in FR Doc 2024–14763, on page 55563, in the first column, under the heading ‘‘China-Wide Entity,’’ correct the first sentence to read: ‘‘In the Preliminary Results, Commerce found that four companies for which a review was initiated did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate.’’ 5 In addition, on page 55563, in the first column, under the heading ‘‘ChinaWide Entity,’’ correct the third sentence to read: ‘‘As such, we continue to determine these four companies identified in Appendix III are part of the China-wide entity.’’ Further, on page 55564, in the third column, under the heading ‘‘Appendix III Companies Determined To Be Part of the ChinaWide Entity,’’ correct the list to include only the following companies: 1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 2. Maodi Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. 3. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co. Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; and Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited (Yingli Energy China). 4. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. Notification to Interested Parties ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: August 13, 2024. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2024–18516 Filed 8–16–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 4 See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 4548. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Aug 16, 2024 Jkt 262001 International Trade Administration [A–428–847] Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From Germany: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of forged steel fluid end blocks (fluid end blocks) from Germany at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. SUMMARY: DATES: Applicable August 19, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order is fluid end blocks from Germany.4 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are listed in an appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Changes Since the Preliminary Results Commerce evaluated the comments in the case and rebuttal briefs and record evidence and made no changes from the Preliminary Results. For a discussion of the comments, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Background Final Results of Review Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3148. On February 7, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of this administrative review.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On July 23, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.3 The deadline for the final results of this administrative review is now August 9, 2024. 1 See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from Germany: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2022, 89 FR 8409 (February 7, 2024) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from Germany; 2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022: Producer/exporter BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH .... Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 19.96 Disclosure Normally, Commerce will disclose the calculations performed in connection with the final results to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of public announcement, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because we have made no changes from the Preliminary Results, there are no new calculations to disclose. Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 4 See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the Federal Republic of Germany and Italy: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination for the Federal Republic of Germany and Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 7528 (January 29, 2021) (Order). E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM 19AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67071-67072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-979]


Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled 
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and 
Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022; Correction

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published in the 
Federal Register of July 5, 2024, notice of the final results of the 
2021-2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into 
modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (China). In 
that notice, Commerce incorrectly identified the companies which it 
found were not entitled to a separate rate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dakota Potts or Paola Aleman Ordaz, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0223 and (202) 
482-4031, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 5, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal Register notice 
of the final results of the 2021-2022 administrative review of the AD 
order on solar cells from China.\1\ In that notice, Commerce 
incorrectly identified the companies which it found were not entitled 
to a separate rate. Commerce preliminarily found that only four 
companies did not qualify for a separate rate.\2\ Commerce did not 
change that determination in the final results of the review. Yet, in 
the final results of review Federal Register notice, Commerce 
inadvertently stated that: {i{time} n the Preliminary Results, Commerce 
found that 35 companies for which a review was initiated did not 
establish their eligibility for a separate rate. No parties contested 
this finding (see discussion regarding the Yingli single entity below). 
As such, we continue to determine these 35 companies identified in 
Appendix III are part of the China-wide entity.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not 
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; and Final Determination of No Shipments; 
2021-2022, 89 FR 55562 (July 5, 2024) (Final Results).
    \2\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not 
Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, and 
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 89 FR 457, 
458-59 (January 4, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \3\ See Final Results, 89 FR at 55563.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce did not determine that the 31 
companies that it incorrectly added to Appendix III

[[Page 67072]]

of the Final Results are ineligible for a separate rate. Rather, in the 
Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that the 31 companies did not 
have suspended entries of subject merchandise during the period of 
review (POR).\4\ Commerce did not change its preliminary decision with 
respect to these 31 companies in the final results of review. 
Therefore, the following corrections are required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 4548.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 5, 2024, in FR Doc 2024-14763, on 
page 55563, in the first column, under the heading ``China-Wide 
Entity,'' correct the first sentence to read: ``In the Preliminary 
Results, Commerce found that four companies for which a review was 
initiated did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate.'' 
\5\ In addition, on page 55563, in the first column, under the heading 
``China-Wide Entity,'' correct the third sentence to read: ``As such, 
we continue to determine these four companies identified in Appendix 
III are part of the China-wide entity.'' Further, on page 55564, in the 
third column, under the heading ``Appendix III Companies Determined To 
Be Part of the China-Wide Entity,'' correct the list to include only 
the following companies:

    1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
    2. Maodi Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
    3. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding 
Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co. Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli 
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy 
Resources Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; 
Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New 
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 
Ltd.; and Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited (Yingli Energy 
China).
    4. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 
351.213(h)(2) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: August 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-18516 Filed 8-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.