Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Administrative Review, and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2022, 67067-67071 [2024-18443]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0625–0125.
average dumping margins are listed
below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’
section of this notice. Commerce
conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For a detailed description of the events
that occurred since the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.3
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this review is
softwood lumber from Canada. For a full
description of the scope, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
[FR Doc. 2024–18499 Filed 8–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–857]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products
From Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Partial Rescission of
Administrative Review, and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters subject to
this administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR),
January 1, 2022, through December 31,
2022.
DATES: Applicable August 19, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Pedersen and Maisha Cryor, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769
and (202) 482–5831, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results on February 6, 2024.1 This
review covers 243 producers/exporters
of subject merchandise, including two
mandatory respondents, Canfor and
West Fraser.2 The final weighted1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 89 FR 8156 (February 6,
2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 As described in the Preliminary Results PDM,
we have treated West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge
Lumber Inc., Manning Forest Products Ltd., and
Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, West
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested a review
withdraws its request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation. The requests for an
administrative review of the companies
identified in Appendix III were timely
withdrawn within 90 days of the
publication of the initiation notice for
this review.4 As a result, Commerce is
rescinding this review with respect to
the companies in Appendix III in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).5
Additionally, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), Commerce will rescind
an administrative review when there are
no entries of subject merchandise
during the POR for which liquidation is
suspended. Normally, upon completion
of an administrative review, the
suspended entries are liquidated at the
antidumping duty assessment rate
calculated for the review period.6
Therefore, for an administrative review
of a company to be conducted, there
must be a suspended entry that
Commerce can instruct and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
liquidate at the antidumping duty
assessment rate calculated for the POR.7
Fraser) and we have treated Canfor Corporation,
Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and Canfor Wood
Products Marketing Ltd., Canfor Fox Creek Ltd. and
Canfor Whitecourt Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a
single entities. See Preliminary Results PDM at 5–
6.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
4 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Partial Withdrawal of
Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated May 17,
2023.
5 Appendix III identifies all companies on which
we have rescinded this review.
6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
7 See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v.
United States, 380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335–36 (CIT
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67067
In the Preliminary Results, we notified
parties of our intent to rescind this
administrative review, in part, with
respect to Smartlam LLC because there
were no suspended entries of subject
merchandise produced or exported by
these companies during the POR and
invited interested parties to comment.
No parties commented on our intent to
rescind the review, in part. In the
absence of any suspended entries of
subject merchandise from Smartlam
LLC during the POR, or any comment
on this issue, we are rescinding the
administrative review for Smartlam
LLC, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3).8
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs
filed in this administrative review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the topics
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is included in Appendix
I of this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is available electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Services System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is also accessible on the
internet at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties, we rescinded this review with
regard to 66 companies for which all
review requests were withdrawn, and
have rescinded the review of Smartlam
LLC, as we stated was our intent in the
Preliminary Results. In addition, we
revised the names of certain
2019), at 12 (referring to section 751(a) of the Act,
the U.S. Court of International Trade held that:
‘‘While the statute does not explicitly require that
an entry be suspended as a prerequisite for
establishing entitlement to a review, it does
explicitly state the determined rate will be used as
the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This
result can only obtain if the liquidation of entries
has been suspended . . .’’; see also Certain Frozen
Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments;
2018–2019, 86 FR 36102, and accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and
Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the
Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR
65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ‘‘for an
administrative review to be conducted, there must
be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated
at the newly calculated assessment rate’’).
8 Appendix III identifies all companies on which
we have rescinded this review.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
67068
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
respondents as identified in the
Preliminary Results, and made certain
changes to the dumping margin
calculations for Canfor and West Fraser.
For a discussion of these changes, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
Generally, when calculating margins
for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act for guidance, which provides
instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that
when calculating the all-others rate,
Commerce will exclude any zero and de
minimis weighted-average dumping
margins, as well as any weightedaverage dumping margins based on total
facts available. Accordingly,
Commerce’s usual practice has been to
average the margins for selected
respondents, excluding margins that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available.
In this review, we calculated a
weighted-average dumping margin of
10.44 percent for Canfor and 5.32
percent for West Fraser. In accordance
with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act,
Commerce assigned the weightedaverage of these two calculated
weighted-average dumping margins to
the non-selected companies in these
final results, based on their publicly
ranged sales data.9 Accordingly, we
have applied a rate of 7.80 percent to
the non-selected companies.10 A list of
all non-selected companies is included
in Appendix II.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this administrative
review, we are assigning the following
weighted-average dumping margins to
the manufacturers/exporters listed
below for the POR, January 1, 2022,
through December 31, 2022:
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
Exporter/producer
Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd./Canfor Fox Creek Ltd./Canfor
Whitecourt Ltd. .........................................................................................................................................................................
West Fraser Mills Ltd./Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning Forest Products Ltd./Sundre Forest Products Inc. ...........................
Non-Selected Companies 11 ........................................................................................................................................................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review.
We intend to calculate importer- (or
customer-) specific assessment rates on
the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of antidumping duties calculated for
each importer’s (or customer’s)
examined sales and the total entered
value of the sales in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer(or customer-) specific rate is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by companies
included in these final results of review
for which the reviewed companies did
not know that the merchandise they
sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Rate for
Non-Selected Respondents,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice. A list of the non-selected
companies under review is included as Appendix
II.
10 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.12
The final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise under review
and for future cash deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable. Commerce
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of these final results, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the
companies under review will be equal
to the weighted-average dumping
margin listed above in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a previously completed
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the
final results for the most recent period
in which that producer or exporter
11 See Appendix II of this notice for a list of the
non-selected respondent companies.
12 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10.44
5.32
7.80
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or in any
previous segment of this proceeding, but
the producer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be that established for the
producer of the merchandise in these
final results of review or in the final
results for the most recent period in
which that producer participated; and
(4) if neither the exporter nor the
producer is a firm covered in this
review or in any previously completed
segment of this proceeding, then the
cash deposit rate will be 6.04 percent ad
valorem, the all-others rate established
in the less than fair value
investigation.13 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount
13 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR
51806 (November 8, 2017).
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
of antidumping duties by the amount of
countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Dated: August 12, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Used the
Proper Market Price for Canfor’s Wood
Chip Sales
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust the Reported Cost of Electricity at
Canfor’s Grand Prairie (PG) Sawmill
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust the Reported Cost of Electricity at
Canfor’s Prince George Sawmill
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Properly
Determined Canfor’s General and
Administrative (G&A) Expense Ratio
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should
Apply the Transactions Disregarded
Provision to Canfor’s Transactions With
Affiliated Seed Suppliers
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should
Include Restructuring Costs Associated
with the Mackenzie Mill
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should
Include Devaluation Losses in Canfor’s
G&A Calculation
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should
Deduct Countervailing Duties (CVD)
from U.S. Price
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
Rescind the Review of Companies for
which all Review Requests Were
Withdrawn
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should
Revise the Names of Certain
Respondents
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should
Revise the Application of West Fraser’s
By-Product Offset
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust West Fraser’s Log Prices
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust West Fraser’s G&A Expenses for
Inventory Valuation Loss
Comment 14: Whether Commerce Double
Counted Billing Adjustments
Comment 15: Whether Commerce Correctly
Applied Surrogate Costs
Comment 16: Whether Commerce’s
Application of the Differential Pricing
Analysis Is Contrary to Law and in
Violation of the Assumptions Articulated
in Stupp
Comment 17: Whether West Fraser’s
Pricing Over the POR Was Inconsistent
with the Targeted Dumping for Which
Congress Authorized Commerce to
Utilize the Average-to-Transaction (A–T)
Method
Comment 18: Whether Commerce
Improperly Applied the A–T
Methodology with Zeroing
Comment 19: Whether Commerce Properly
Applied its Differential Pricing
Methodology to Address Targeted
Dumping
Comment 20: Whether Commerce’s Use of
Simple Average Standard Deviations in
the Cohen’s d Denominator Disregards
Comparative Sizes of Test and Control
Groups
Comment 21: Whether Commerce’s
Methodology and Explanation for
Calculating the Denominator of the d
Coefficient Are Unreasonable
Comment 22: Whether Commerce Erred in
Finding a Pattern of U.S. Prices That
Differ Significantly Among Purchasers,
Regions, or Periods of Time
Comment 23: Whether Commerce Failed to
Consider Qualitative Factors in
Determining Whether Prices Were
Significant
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Non-Selected Exporters/Producers
1. 0752615 B.C Ltd; Fraserview
Remanufacturing Inc; Fraserview Cedar
Products 14
2. 10104704 Manitoba Ltd.; Woodstock
Forest Products 15
3. 1074712 BC Ltd.; Quadra Cedar
4. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.
5. Absolute Lumber Products Ltd.
6. Adwood Manufacturing Ltd.
7. AJ Forest Products Ltd.
8. Aler Forest Products Ltd.
14 ‘‘DBA’’ has been removed from the name
0752615 B.C Ltd; Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc;
DBA Fraserview Cedar Products referred to in the
Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
15 ‘‘O/A’’ has been removed from the name
10104704 Manitoba Ltd O/A Woodstock Forest
Product referred to in the Preliminary Results, at the
request of CBP. See Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 10.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67069
9. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
10. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
11. Antrim Cedar Corporation
12. Aquila Cedar Products Ltd.
13. Arbec Lumber Inc.; Arbec Bois Doeuvre
Inc.
14. Aspen Pacific Industries Inc.
15. Aspen Planers Ltd.
16. B&L Forest Products Ltd.
17. B.B. Pallets Inc.; Les Palettes B.B.Inc.
18. Babine Forest Products Limited
19. Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
20. Barrette-Chapais Ltee
21. BarretteWood Inc.
22. Benoı̂t & Dionne Produits Forestiers Ltee;
Benoı̂t & Dionne Forest Products Ltd.
23. Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
24. Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
25. Bois Aise de Montreal Inc.
26. Bois Bonsaı̈ Inc.
27. Bois Daaquam Inc.; Daaquam Lumber Inc.
28. Bois D’oeuvre Cedrico Inc.; Cedrico
Lumber Inc.
29. Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc.;
SPEC Wood & Marketing Solution; SPEC
Wood and Marketing Solutions Inc.
30. Bois Weedon Inc.
31. Boisaco Inc.
32. Boscus Canada Inc.
33. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.
34. BPWood Ltd.
35. Bramwood Forest Inc.
36. Brink Forest Products Ltd.
37. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
38. Burrows Lumber (CD) Ltd., Theo A.
Burrows Lumber Company Limited
39. Busque & Laflamme Inc.
40. Canadian Bavarian Millwork & Lumber
Ltd.
41. Canyon Lumber Company Ltd.
42. Carrier & Begin Inc.
43. Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
44. Carrier Lumber Ltd.
45. Carter Forest Products Inc.
46. Cedarland Forest Products Ltd.
47. Cedarline Industries Ltd.
48. Central Alberta Pallet Supply
49. Central Cedar Ltd.
50. Central Forest Products Inc.
51. Centurion Lumber Ltd.
52. Chaleur Forest Products Inc.
53. Chaleur Forest Products LP
54. Channel-ex Trading Corporation
55. Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
56. Clermond Hamel Ltee
57. CLG Enterprises Inc.
58. Columbia River Shake & Shingle Ltd.;
Teal Cedar Products Ltd.; 16 The Teal Jones
Group 17
59. Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
60. Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
61. Coulson Manufacturing Ltd.
16 ‘‘DBA’’ has been removed from the name
Columbia River Shake & Shingle Ltd./Teal Cedar
Products Ltd., DBA the Teal Jones Group referred
to in the Preliminary Results at the request of CBP.
See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment
10.
17 Because we are now treating the three
companies as one entity for customs purposes, we
have removed from the Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE) module case number individual
company case numbers for Teal Cedar Products Ltd.
(A–122–857–224) and The Teal Jones Group (A–
122–857–227) and have instructed CBP to enter all
entries for all three companies under the ACE
module case number A–122–857–349.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
67070
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
62. Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
63. CS Manufacturing Inc.; Cedarshed 18
64. CWP—Industriel Inc.
65. D & D Pallets Ltd.
66. Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
67. Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
68. Deep Cove Forest Products, Inc.
69. Delco Forest Products Ltd.
70. Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
71. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
72. Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
73. Downie Timber Ltd.
74. Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
75. EACOM Timber Corporation
76. East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
77. Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
78. ER Probyn Export Ltd.
79. Falcon Lumber Ltd.
80. Fontaine Inc.
81. Foothills Forest Products Inc.
82. Forest Products Mauricie LP; Societe en
commandite Scierie Opitciwan; Resolute
Growth Canada Inc.; Resolute FP Canada
Inc.; Resolute-LP Engineered Wood
Larouche Inc.; Resolute-LP Engineered
Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership
83. Fort St. James Forest Products Limited
Partnership
84. Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
85. FraserWood Industries Ltd.
86. Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
87. Galloway Lumber Company Ltd.
88. Goldwood Industries Ltd.
89. Goodfellow Inc.
90. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
91. Greendale Industries Inc.
92. GreenFirst Forest Products (QC) Inc.
93. Greenwell Resources Inc.
94. Griff Building Supplies Ltd.
95. Groupe Crete Chertsey Inc.
96. Groupe Crete Division St-Faustin Inc.
97. Groupe Lebel Inc.
98. H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
99. Haida Forest Products Ltd.
100. Halo Sawmill, a division of Delta Cedar
Specialties Ltd.; Halo Sawmill
Manufacturing Limited Partnership
101. Hampton Tree Farms, LLC; Hampton
Lumber Sales Canada 19
102. Hornepayne Lumber LP
103. Hy Mark Wood Products Inc.
104. Independent Building Materials
Distribution Inc.
105. Interfor Corporation; Interfor Sales &
Marketing Ltd.20
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
18 ‘‘dba’’
has been removed from the name CS
Manufacturing Inc. (dba Cedarshed) referred to in
the Preliminary Results at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
19 ‘‘dba’’ has been removed from the name
Hampton Tree Farms, LLC (dba Hampton Lumber
Sales Canada) referred to in the Preliminary Results
at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 10.
20 In Softwood Lumber from Canada AR4, we
determined that it was appropriate to threat Interfor
Corporation and Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd. as
one entity. See Certain Softwood Lumber Products
from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final Determination of
No Shipments; 2021, 88 FR 50106 (August 1, 2023)
(Softwood Lumber from Canada AR4), at Appendix
II. Thus, we have removed from the ACE module
case number for Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd. (A–
122–857–299) and have instructed CBP to enter all
entries for Interfor Corporation and Interfor Sales &
Marketing Ltd. under the ACE module case number
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
106. Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
107. J&G Log Works Ltd.
108. J.D. Irving, Limited
109. J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
110. Jan Woodlands (2001) Inc.
111. Jasco Forest Products Ltd.
112. Jazz Forest Products Ltd.
113. Jhajj Lumber Corporation
114. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
115. Kan Wood Ltd.
116. Kebois Ltee; Kebois Ltd.
117. Kelfor Industries Ltd.
118. Kermode Forest Products Ltd.
119. Keystone Timber Ltd.
120. La Crete Sawmills Ltd.
121. Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
122. Langevin Forest Products Inc.
123. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
124. Leisure Lumber Ltd.
125. Les Bois d’oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier
Inc.
126. Les Bois Martek Lumber
127. Les Chantiers de Chibougamau Ltee; Les
Chantiers de Chibougamau Ltd.
128. Les Industries P.F. Inc.
129. Les Produits Forestiers D&G Ltee; D&G
Forest Products Ltd.
130. Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
131. Lignum Forest Products LLP
132. Linwood Homes Ltd.
133. Lonestar Lumber lnc.
134. Lulumco Inc.
135. Madera Forest Products INC
136. Magnum Forest Products Ltd.
137. Maibec Inc.
138. Manitou Forest Products Ltd.
139. Marcel Lauzon Inc.
140. Marwood Ltd.
141. Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
142. Mid Valley Lumber Specialties Ltd.
143. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
144. Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
145. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
146. Mirax Lumber Products Ltd.
147. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.
148. Monterra Lumber Mills Limited
149. Morwood Forest Products Inc.
150. Multicedre Ltee
151. Murray Brothers Lumber Company Ltd.
152. Nakina Lumber Inc.
153. National Forest Products Ltd.
154. Nicholson and Cates Ltd.
155. Norsask Forest Products Inc.
156. Norsask Forest Products Limited
Partnership
157. North American Forest Products Ltd.
(located in Abbotsford, British Columbia)
158. North American Forest Products Ltd.
(located in Saint-Quentin, New Brunswick)
159. North Enderby Timber Ltd.
160. Northland Forest Products Ltd.
161. Oakwood Manufacturing A Division of
Weston Forest Products Inc.
162. Olympic Industries Inc.
163. Olympic Industries ULC
164. Oregon Canadian Forest Products;
Oregon Canadian Forest Products Inc.
165. Pacific NorthWest Lumber Ltd.
166. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
167. PalletSource Inc.
168. Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
169. Partap Forest Products Ltd.
170. Partap Industries
for Interfor Corporation and Interfor Sales &
Marketing Ltd. (A–122–857–118)
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
171. Peak Industries (Cranbrook) Ltd.
172. Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
173. Pine Ideas Ltd.
174. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd.
175. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
176. Portbec Forest Products Ltd.; Les
Produits Forestiers Portbec Ltee
177. Power Wood Corp.
178. Precision Cedar Products Corp.
179. Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc.
180. Produits Matra Inc.
181. Promobois G.D.S. Inc.
182. R.A. Green Lumber Ltd.
183. Rembos Inc.
184. Rene Bernard Inc.
185. Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
186. River City Remanufacturing Inc.
187. S&R Sawmills Ltd.
188. San Group
189. San Industries Ltd.
190. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
191. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc.
192. Scierie St-Michel Inc.
193. Scierie West Brome Inc.
194. Scott Lumber Sales; Scott Lumber Sales
Ltd.
195. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.
196. Shakertown Corp.
197. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
198. Silvaris Corporation
199. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
200. Skana Forest Products Ltd.
201. Skeena Sawmills Ltd.
202. Smart Wood Forest Products Ltd.
203. South Beach Trading Inc.
204. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc.;
Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc. (SBC)
205. Spruceland Millworks Inc.
206. Suncoast Industries Inc.
207. Sundher Timber Products Inc.
208. Surrey Cedar Ltd.
209. T.G. Wood Products Ltd.21
210. Taan Forest Limited Partnership; Taan
Forest Products 22
211. Taiga Building Products Ltd.
212. Tall Tree Lumber Company
213. Tenryu Canada Corporation
214. Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
215. The Wood Source Inc.
216. Tolko Industries Ltd.; Tolko Marketing
and Sales Ltd.; Gilbert Smith Forest
Products Ltd.
217. Top Quality Lumber Ltd.
218. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
21 The ACE module contains separate case
numbers for T.G. Wood Products Ltd. (A–122–857–
220) and TG Wood Products (A–122–857–360),
which was caused by data entry errors and we have
never treated T.G. Wood Products and TG Wood
Products as separate companies; rather we named
T.G. Wood Products Ltd. as the sole respondent in
the first and second administrative reviews of this
proceeding and TG Wood Products. See Certain
Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 76519 (November 30,
2020); Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2019, 86 FR 68471
(December 2, 2021); and Softwood Lumber from
Canada AR4. We have removed TG Wood Products
(A–122–857–360) from the module and instructed
CBP to enter all entries under the case number A–
122–857–220.
22 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name Taan
Forest Limited Partnership (aka Taan Forest
Products) referred to in at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2024 / Notices
219. Triad Forest Products Ltd.
220. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
221. Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
222. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
223. Usine Sartigan Inc.
224. Vaagen Fibre Canada ULC
225. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products
Ltd.
226. Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products
Ltd.
227. Vanderwell Contractors (1971) Ltd.
228. Visscher Lumber Inc.
229. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
230. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
231. West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
232. West Coast Panel Cutters
233. Western Forest Products Inc.
234. Western Lumber Sales Limited
235. Westminster Industries Ltd.
236. Weston Forest Products Inc.
237. Westrend Exteriors Inc
238. Weyerhaeuser Co.
239. White River Forest Products L.P.
240. Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
241. Woodtone Specialties Inc.
Appendix III
List of Companies Rescinded From the
Review
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. 54 Reman
2. 9224–5737 Quebec Inc.; A.G. Bois 23
3. AA Trading Ltd.
4. All American Forest Products Inc.
5. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.;
Anglo-American Cedar Products Ltd.
6. Bardobec Inc.
7. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
8. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co. Ltd.
9. Canada Pallet Corp.
10. Canasia Forest Industries Ltd.
11. Careau Bois inc.
12. CarlWood Lumber Ltd.24
13. Cedar Island Forest Products Ltd.
14. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
15. Cedarcoast Lumber Products
16. CHAP Alliance, Inc.
17. CNH Products Inc.
18. Coast Clear Wood Ltd.
19. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
20. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); Comox
Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd.25
21. CWP—Montreal Inc.
22. DH Manufacturing Inc.
23. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
24. Distribution Rioux Inc.
25. Elrod Cartage Ltd.
26. Glandell Enterprises Inc.
27. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
28. GreenFirst Forest Products Inc.
29. Groupe Lignarex Inc.
30. Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc.
31. Imperial Cedar Products Ltd.
23 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name 224–
5737 Quebec Inc. (aka A.G. Bois) referred to in the
Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
24 CarlWood Lumber Ltd. is referred to in the ACE
module as Carl Wood Lumber Ltd.
25 ‘‘AKA’’ has been removed from the name
Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); AKA Comox
Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd. referred to in the
Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Aug 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
32. Intertran Holdings Ltd.; Richmond
Terminal 26
33. Island Cedar Products Ltd.
34. Les Bardeaux Lajoie Inc.
35. Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc.
36. Les Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc.; Sitka
Forest Products Inc.27
37. Lumber Assets Holding LP
38. Mainland Sawmill, a division of Terminal
Forest Products
39. Metrie Canada Ltd.
40. Modern Terminal Ltd.
41. Nagaard Sawmill Ltd.
42. Nickel Lake Lumber
43. NSC Lumber Ltd.
44. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd.
45. Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc.
46. Pacific Pallet Ltd.
47. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
48. Rick Dubois
49. S&W Forest Products Ltd.
50. Sapphire Lumber Company
51. Smartlam LLC
52. Sonora Logging Ltd.
53. Source Forest Products
54. South Coast Reman Ltd.; Southcoast
Millwork Ltd.
55. South Fraser Container Terminals
56. Star Lumber Canada Ltd.
57. Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd.
58. Surplus G Rioux
59. Swiftwood Forest Products Ltd.
60. T&P Trucking Ltd.
61. Temrex Forest Products LP; Produits
Forestiers Temrex SEC.
62. Valley Cedar 2 Inc.
63. Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
64. Western Timber Products, Inc.
65. Winton Homes Ltd.
66. Woodstock Forest Products
67. WWW Timber Products Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024–18443 Filed 8–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results and Final
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022; Correction
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
26 ‘‘dba’’ has been removed from the name
Intertran Holdings Ltd. (dba Richmond Terminal)
referred to in the Preliminary Results at the request
of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 10.
27 ‘‘aka’’ has been removed from the name Les
Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc. (aka Sitka Forest
Products Inc.) referred to in the Preliminary Results,
at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 10.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67071
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) published in the
Federal Register of July 5, 2024, notice
of the final results of the 2021–2022
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
whether or not assembled into modules
(solar cells), from the People’s Republic
of China (China). In that notice,
Commerce incorrectly identified the
companies which it found were not
entitled to a separate rate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dakota Potts or Paola Aleman Ordaz,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223
and (202) 482–4031, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On July 5, 2024, Commerce published
in the Federal Register notice of the
final results of the 2021–2022
administrative review of the AD order
on solar cells from China.1 In that
notice, Commerce incorrectly identified
the companies which it found were not
entitled to a separate rate. Commerce
preliminarily found that only four
companies did not qualify for a separate
rate.2 Commerce did not change that
determination in the final results of the
review. Yet, in the final results of
review Federal Register notice,
Commerce inadvertently stated that:
{i}n the Preliminary Results, Commerce
found that 35 companies for which a
review was initiated did not establish
their eligibility for a separate rate. No
parties contested this finding (see
discussion regarding the Yingli single
entity below). As such, we continue to
determine these 35 companies
identified in Appendix III are part of the
China-wide entity.3
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
did not determine that the 31 companies
that it incorrectly added to Appendix III
1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; and Final Determination of
No Shipments; 2021–2022, 89 FR 55562 (July 5,
2024) (Final Results).
2 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review,
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments;
2021–2022, 89 FR 457, 458–59 (January 4, 2024)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
3 See Final Results, 89 FR at 55563.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67067-67071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18443]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-857]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of
Administrative Review, and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made
sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the
period of review (POR), January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable August 19, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen and Maisha Cryor, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769 and (202) 482-5831, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary Results on February 6, 2024.\1\
This review covers 243 producers/exporters of subject merchandise,
including two mandatory respondents, Canfor and West Fraser.\2\ The
final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final
Results of Review'' section of this notice. Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a detailed description of the
events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 89 FR
8156 (February 6, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ As described in the Preliminary Results PDM, we have treated
West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning Forest
Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, West
Fraser) and we have treated Canfor Corporation, Canadian Forest
Products Ltd., and Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd., Canfor Fox
Creek Ltd. and Canfor Whitecourt Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a
single entities. See Preliminary Results PDM at 5-6.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the 2022 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this review is softwood lumber from Canada.
For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
a review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation. The requests for an
administrative review of the companies identified in Appendix III were
timely withdrawn within 90 days of the publication of the initiation
notice for this review.\4\ As a result, Commerce is rescinding this
review with respect to the companies in Appendix III in accordance with
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Partial Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated May 17, 2023.
\5\ Appendix III identifies all companies on which we have
rescinded this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), Commerce will
rescind an administrative review when there are no entries of subject
merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.
Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty assessment rate
calculated for the review period.\6\ Therefore, for an administrative
review of a company to be conducted, there must be a suspended entry
that Commerce can instruct and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
to liquidate at the antidumping duty assessment rate calculated for the
POR.\7\ In the Preliminary Results, we notified parties of our intent
to rescind this administrative review, in part, with respect to
Smartlam LLC because there were no suspended entries of subject
merchandise produced or exported by these companies during the POR and
invited interested parties to comment. No parties commented on our
intent to rescind the review, in part. In the absence of any suspended
entries of subject merchandise from Smartlam LLC during the POR, or any
comment on this issue, we are rescinding the administrative review for
Smartlam LLC, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\7\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States,
380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335-36 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to
section 751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade
held that: ``While the statute does not explicitly require that an
entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to
a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used
as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can
only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended . .
.''; see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-
2019, 86 FR 36102, and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the
Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that
``for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a
reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated
assessment rate'').
\8\ Appendix III identifies all companies on which we have
rescinded this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs filed in this administrative
review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of
the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included
in Appendix I of this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is available electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Services System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is also accessible on the internet at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review of the record and comments received from
interested parties, we rescinded this review with regard to 66
companies for which all review requests were withdrawn, and have
rescinded the review of Smartlam LLC, as we stated was our intent in
the Preliminary Results. In addition, we revised the names of certain
[[Page 67068]]
respondents as identified in the Preliminary Results, and made certain
changes to the dumping margin calculations for Canfor and West Fraser.
For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when
calculating the all-others rate, Commerce will exclude any zero and de
minimis weighted-average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-
average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly,
Commerce's usual practice has been to average the margins for selected
respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available.
In this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of
10.44 percent for Canfor and 5.32 percent for West Fraser. In
accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce assigned the
weighted-average of these two calculated weighted-average dumping
margins to the non-selected companies in these final results, based on
their publicly ranged sales data.\9\ Accordingly, we have applied a
rate of 7.80 percent to the non-selected companies.\10\ A list of all
non-selected companies is included in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected
Respondents,'' dated concurrently with this notice. A list of the
non-selected companies under review is included as Appendix II.
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
As a result of this administrative review, we are assigning the
following weighted-average dumping margins to the manufacturers/
exporters listed below for the POR, January 1, 2022, through December
31, 2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter/producer dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./ 10.44
Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd./Canfor Fox
Creek Ltd./Canfor Whitecourt Ltd...................
West Fraser Mills Ltd./Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./ 5.32
Manning Forest Products Ltd./Sundre Forest Products
Inc................................................
Non-Selected Companies \11\......................... 7.80
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Appendix II of this notice for a list of the non-
selected respondent companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to calculate importer- (or customer-) specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for each importer's (or customer's) examined sales
and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- (or customer-) specific rate is zero
or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
Commerce's ``reseller policy'' will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these
final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know
that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis
for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise
under review and for future cash deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
356.8(a).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash
deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin listed above in the ``Final Results of
Review'' section; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previously
completed segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published in the final results
for the most recent period in which that producer or exporter
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review
or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the producer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be that established for the producer of
the merchandise in these final results of review or in the final
results for the most recent period in which that producer participated;
and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in
this review or in any previously completed segment of this proceeding,
then the cash deposit rate will be 6.04 percent ad valorem, the all-
others rate established in the less than fair value investigation.\13\
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR
51806 (November 8, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount
[[Page 67069]]
of antidumping duties by the amount of countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: August 12, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Used the Proper Market Price for
Canfor's Wood Chip Sales
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Reported Cost of
Electricity at Canfor's Grand Prairie (PG) Sawmill
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Reported Cost of
Electricity at Canfor's Prince George Sawmill
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Properly Determined Canfor's General
and Administrative (G&A) Expense Ratio
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Apply the Transactions
Disregarded Provision to Canfor's Transactions With Affiliated Seed
Suppliers
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Include Restructuring Costs
Associated with the Mackenzie Mill
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Include Devaluation Losses in
Canfor's G&A Calculation
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Deduct Countervailing Duties
(CVD) from U.S. Price
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Rescind the Review of
Companies for which all Review Requests Were Withdrawn
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Names of Certain
Respondents
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Application of
West Fraser's By-Product Offset
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Adjust West Fraser's Log
Prices
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Adjust West Fraser's G&A
Expenses for Inventory Valuation Loss
Comment 14: Whether Commerce Double Counted Billing Adjustments
Comment 15: Whether Commerce Correctly Applied Surrogate Costs
Comment 16: Whether Commerce's Application of the Differential
Pricing Analysis Is Contrary to Law and in Violation of the
Assumptions Articulated in Stupp
Comment 17: Whether West Fraser's Pricing Over the POR Was
Inconsistent with the Targeted Dumping for Which Congress Authorized
Commerce to Utilize the Average-to-Transaction (A-T) Method
Comment 18: Whether Commerce Improperly Applied the A-T
Methodology with Zeroing
Comment 19: Whether Commerce Properly Applied its Differential
Pricing Methodology to Address Targeted Dumping
Comment 20: Whether Commerce's Use of Simple Average Standard
Deviations in the Cohen's d Denominator Disregards Comparative Sizes
of Test and Control Groups
Comment 21: Whether Commerce's Methodology and Explanation for
Calculating the Denominator of the d Coefficient Are Unreasonable
Comment 22: Whether Commerce Erred in Finding a Pattern of U.S.
Prices That Differ Significantly Among Purchasers, Regions, or
Periods of Time
Comment 23: Whether Commerce Failed to Consider Qualitative
Factors in Determining Whether Prices Were Significant
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Non-Selected Exporters/Producers
1. 0752615 B.C Ltd; Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc; Fraserview Cedar
Products \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ``DBA'' has been removed from the name 0752615 B.C Ltd;
Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc; DBA Fraserview Cedar Products
referred to in the Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. 10104704 Manitoba Ltd.; Woodstock Forest Products \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ ``O/A'' has been removed from the name 10104704 Manitoba
Ltd O/A Woodstock Forest Product referred to in the Preliminary
Results, at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. 1074712 BC Ltd.; Quadra Cedar
4. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.
5. Absolute Lumber Products Ltd.
6. Adwood Manufacturing Ltd.
7. AJ Forest Products Ltd.
8. Aler Forest Products Ltd.
9. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
10. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
11. Antrim Cedar Corporation
12. Aquila Cedar Products Ltd.
13. Arbec Lumber Inc.; Arbec Bois Doeuvre Inc.
14. Aspen Pacific Industries Inc.
15. Aspen Planers Ltd.
16. B&L Forest Products Ltd.
17. B.B. Pallets Inc.; Les Palettes B.B.Inc.
18. Babine Forest Products Limited
19. Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
20. Barrette-Chapais Ltee
21. BarretteWood Inc.
22. Beno[icirc]t & Dionne Produits Forestiers Ltee; Beno[icirc]t &
Dionne Forest Products Ltd.
23. Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
24. Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
25. Bois Aise de Montreal Inc.
26. Bois Bonsa[iuml] Inc.
27. Bois Daaquam Inc.; Daaquam Lumber Inc.
28. Bois D'oeuvre Cedrico Inc.; Cedrico Lumber Inc.
29. Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc.; SPEC Wood & Marketing
Solution; SPEC Wood and Marketing Solutions Inc.
30. Bois Weedon Inc.
31. Boisaco Inc.
32. Boscus Canada Inc.
33. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.
34. BPWood Ltd.
35. Bramwood Forest Inc.
36. Brink Forest Products Ltd.
37. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
38. Burrows Lumber (CD) Ltd., Theo A. Burrows Lumber Company Limited
39. Busque & Laflamme Inc.
40. Canadian Bavarian Millwork & Lumber Ltd.
41. Canyon Lumber Company Ltd.
42. Carrier & Begin Inc.
43. Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
44. Carrier Lumber Ltd.
45. Carter Forest Products Inc.
46. Cedarland Forest Products Ltd.
47. Cedarline Industries Ltd.
48. Central Alberta Pallet Supply
49. Central Cedar Ltd.
50. Central Forest Products Inc.
51. Centurion Lumber Ltd.
52. Chaleur Forest Products Inc.
53. Chaleur Forest Products LP
54. Channel-ex Trading Corporation
55. Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
56. Clermond Hamel Ltee
57. CLG Enterprises Inc.
58. Columbia River Shake & Shingle Ltd.; Teal Cedar Products Ltd.;
\16\ The Teal Jones Group \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ ``DBA'' has been removed from the name Columbia River Shake
& Shingle Ltd./Teal Cedar Products Ltd., DBA the Teal Jones Group
referred to in the Preliminary Results at the request of CBP. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
\17\ Because we are now treating the three companies as one
entity for customs purposes, we have removed from the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) module case number individual company
case numbers for Teal Cedar Products Ltd. (A-122-857-224) and The
Teal Jones Group (A-122-857-227) and have instructed CBP to enter
all entries for all three companies under the ACE module case number
A-122-857-349.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
59. Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
60. Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
61. Coulson Manufacturing Ltd.
[[Page 67070]]
62. Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
63. CS Manufacturing Inc.; Cedarshed \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ ``dba'' has been removed from the name CS Manufacturing
Inc. (dba Cedarshed) referred to in the Preliminary Results at the
request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
64. CWP--Industriel Inc.
65. D & D Pallets Ltd.
66. Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
67. Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
68. Deep Cove Forest Products, Inc.
69. Delco Forest Products Ltd.
70. Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
71. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
72. Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
73. Downie Timber Ltd.
74. Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
75. EACOM Timber Corporation
76. East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
77. Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
78. ER Probyn Export Ltd.
79. Falcon Lumber Ltd.
80. Fontaine Inc.
81. Foothills Forest Products Inc.
82. Forest Products Mauricie LP; Societe en commandite Scierie
Opitciwan; Resolute Growth Canada Inc.; Resolute FP Canada Inc.;
Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc.; Resolute-LP Engineered
Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership
83. Fort St. James Forest Products Limited Partnership
84. Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
85. FraserWood Industries Ltd.
86. Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
87. Galloway Lumber Company Ltd.
88. Goldwood Industries Ltd.
89. Goodfellow Inc.
90. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
91. Greendale Industries Inc.
92. GreenFirst Forest Products (QC) Inc.
93. Greenwell Resources Inc.
94. Griff Building Supplies Ltd.
95. Groupe Crete Chertsey Inc.
96. Groupe Crete Division St-Faustin Inc.
97. Groupe Lebel Inc.
98. H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
99. Haida Forest Products Ltd.
100. Halo Sawmill, a division of Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.; Halo
Sawmill Manufacturing Limited Partnership
101. Hampton Tree Farms, LLC; Hampton Lumber Sales Canada \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ ``dba'' has been removed from the name Hampton Tree Farms,
LLC (dba Hampton Lumber Sales Canada) referred to in the Preliminary
Results at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
102. Hornepayne Lumber LP
103. Hy Mark Wood Products Inc.
104. Independent Building Materials Distribution Inc.
105. Interfor Corporation; Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In Softwood Lumber from Canada AR4, we determined that it
was appropriate to threat Interfor Corporation and Interfor Sales &
Marketing Ltd. as one entity. See Certain Softwood Lumber Products
from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021, 88 FR 50106 (August
1, 2023) (Softwood Lumber from Canada AR4), at Appendix II. Thus, we
have removed from the ACE module case number for Interfor Sales &
Marketing Ltd. (A-122-857-299) and have instructed CBP to enter all
entries for Interfor Corporation and Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd.
under the ACE module case number for Interfor Corporation and
Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd. (A-122-857-118)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
106. Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
107. J&G Log Works Ltd.
108. J.D. Irving, Limited
109. J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
110. Jan Woodlands (2001) Inc.
111. Jasco Forest Products Ltd.
112. Jazz Forest Products Ltd.
113. Jhajj Lumber Corporation
114. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
115. Kan Wood Ltd.
116. Kebois Ltee; Kebois Ltd.
117. Kelfor Industries Ltd.
118. Kermode Forest Products Ltd.
119. Keystone Timber Ltd.
120. La Crete Sawmills Ltd.
121. Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
122. Langevin Forest Products Inc.
123. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
124. Leisure Lumber Ltd.
125. Les Bois d'oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier Inc.
126. Les Bois Martek Lumber
127. Les Chantiers de Chibougamau Ltee; Les Chantiers de Chibougamau
Ltd.
128. Les Industries P.F. Inc.
129. Les Produits Forestiers D&G Ltee; D&G Forest Products Ltd.
130. Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
131. Lignum Forest Products LLP
132. Linwood Homes Ltd.
133. Lonestar Lumber lnc.
134. Lulumco Inc.
135. Madera Forest Products INC
136. Magnum Forest Products Ltd.
137. Maibec Inc.
138. Manitou Forest Products Ltd.
139. Marcel Lauzon Inc.
140. Marwood Ltd.
141. Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
142. Mid Valley Lumber Specialties Ltd.
143. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
144. Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
145. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
146. Mirax Lumber Products Ltd.
147. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.
148. Monterra Lumber Mills Limited
149. Morwood Forest Products Inc.
150. Multicedre Ltee
151. Murray Brothers Lumber Company Ltd.
152. Nakina Lumber Inc.
153. National Forest Products Ltd.
154. Nicholson and Cates Ltd.
155. Norsask Forest Products Inc.
156. Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership
157. North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Abbotsford,
British Columbia)
158. North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Saint-Quentin,
New Brunswick)
159. North Enderby Timber Ltd.
160. Northland Forest Products Ltd.
161. Oakwood Manufacturing A Division of Weston Forest Products Inc.
162. Olympic Industries Inc.
163. Olympic Industries ULC
164. Oregon Canadian Forest Products; Oregon Canadian Forest
Products Inc.
165. Pacific NorthWest Lumber Ltd.
166. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
167. PalletSource Inc.
168. Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
169. Partap Forest Products Ltd.
170. Partap Industries
171. Peak Industries (Cranbrook) Ltd.
172. Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
173. Pine Ideas Ltd.
174. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd.
175. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
176. Portbec Forest Products Ltd.; Les Produits Forestiers Portbec
Ltee
177. Power Wood Corp.
178. Precision Cedar Products Corp.
179. Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc.
180. Produits Matra Inc.
181. Promobois G.D.S. Inc.
182. R.A. Green Lumber Ltd.
183. Rembos Inc.
184. Rene Bernard Inc.
185. Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
186. River City Remanufacturing Inc.
187. S&R Sawmills Ltd.
188. San Group
189. San Industries Ltd.
190. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
191. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc.
192. Scierie St-Michel Inc.
193. Scierie West Brome Inc.
194. Scott Lumber Sales; Scott Lumber Sales Ltd.
195. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.
196. Shakertown Corp.
197. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
198. Silvaris Corporation
199. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
200. Skana Forest Products Ltd.
201. Skeena Sawmills Ltd.
202. Smart Wood Forest Products Ltd.
203. South Beach Trading Inc.
204. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc.; Specialiste du Bardeau de
Cedre Inc. (SBC)
205. Spruceland Millworks Inc.
206. Suncoast Industries Inc.
207. Sundher Timber Products Inc.
208. Surrey Cedar Ltd.
209. T.G. Wood Products Ltd.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The ACE module contains separate case numbers for T.G. Wood
Products Ltd. (A-122-857-220) and TG Wood Products (A-122-857-360),
which was caused by data entry errors and we have never treated T.G.
Wood Products and TG Wood Products as separate companies; rather we
named T.G. Wood Products Ltd. as the sole respondent in the first
and second administrative reviews of this proceeding and TG Wood
Products. See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 85 FR
76519 (November 30, 2020); Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2019, 86 FR 68471 (December 2, 2021); and Softwood Lumber from
Canada AR4. We have removed TG Wood Products (A-122-857-360) from
the module and instructed CBP to enter all entries under the case
number A-122-857-220.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
210. Taan Forest Limited Partnership; Taan Forest Products \22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ ``aka'' has been removed from the name Taan Forest Limited
Partnership (aka Taan Forest Products) referred to in at the request
of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
211. Taiga Building Products Ltd.
212. Tall Tree Lumber Company
213. Tenryu Canada Corporation
214. Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
215. The Wood Source Inc.
216. Tolko Industries Ltd.; Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd.; Gilbert
Smith Forest Products Ltd.
217. Top Quality Lumber Ltd.
218. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
[[Page 67071]]
219. Triad Forest Products Ltd.
220. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
221. Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
222. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
223. Usine Sartigan Inc.
224. Vaagen Fibre Canada ULC
225. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd.
226. Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products Ltd.
227. Vanderwell Contractors (1971) Ltd.
228. Visscher Lumber Inc.
229. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
230. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
231. West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
232. West Coast Panel Cutters
233. Western Forest Products Inc.
234. Western Lumber Sales Limited
235. Westminster Industries Ltd.
236. Weston Forest Products Inc.
237. Westrend Exteriors Inc
238. Weyerhaeuser Co.
239. White River Forest Products L.P.
240. Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
241. Woodtone Specialties Inc.
Appendix III
List of Companies Rescinded From the Review
1. 54 Reman
2. 9224-5737 Quebec Inc.; A.G. Bois \23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ ``aka'' has been removed from the name 224-5737 Quebec Inc.
(aka A.G. Bois) referred to in the Preliminary Results, at the
request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. AA Trading Ltd.
4. All American Forest Products Inc.
5. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.; Anglo-American Cedar Products
Ltd.
6. Bardobec Inc.
7. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
8. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co. Ltd.
9. Canada Pallet Corp.
10. Canasia Forest Industries Ltd.
11. Careau Bois inc.
12. CarlWood Lumber Ltd.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ CarlWood Lumber Ltd. is referred to in the ACE module as
Carl Wood Lumber Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Cedar Island Forest Products Ltd.
14. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
15. Cedarcoast Lumber Products
16. CHAP Alliance, Inc.
17. CNH Products Inc.
18. Coast Clear Wood Ltd.
19. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
20. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. (2019); Comox Valley Shakes (2019)
Ltd.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ ``AKA'' has been removed from the name Comox Valley Shakes
Ltd. (2019); AKA Comox Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd. referred to in the
Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. CWP--Montreal Inc.
22. DH Manufacturing Inc.
23. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
24. Distribution Rioux Inc.
25. Elrod Cartage Ltd.
26. Glandell Enterprises Inc.
27. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
28. GreenFirst Forest Products Inc.
29. Groupe Lignarex Inc.
30. Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc.
31. Imperial Cedar Products Ltd.
32. Intertran Holdings Ltd.; Richmond Terminal \26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ ``dba'' has been removed from the name Intertran Holdings
Ltd. (dba Richmond Terminal) referred to in the Preliminary Results
at the request of CBP. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment
10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
33. Island Cedar Products Ltd.
34. Les Bardeaux Lajoie Inc.
35. Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc.
36. Les Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc.; Sitka Forest Products
Inc.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ ``aka'' has been removed from the name Les Produits
Forestiers Sitka Inc. (aka Sitka Forest Products Inc.) referred to
in the Preliminary Results, at the request of CBP. See Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
37. Lumber Assets Holding LP
38. Mainland Sawmill, a division of Terminal Forest Products
39. Metrie Canada Ltd.
40. Modern Terminal Ltd.
41. Nagaard Sawmill Ltd.
42. Nickel Lake Lumber
43. NSC Lumber Ltd.
44. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd.
45. Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc.
46. Pacific Pallet Ltd.
47. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
48. Rick Dubois
49. S&W Forest Products Ltd.
50. Sapphire Lumber Company
51. Smartlam LLC
52. Sonora Logging Ltd.
53. Source Forest Products
54. South Coast Reman Ltd.; Southcoast Millwork Ltd.
55. South Fraser Container Terminals
56. Star Lumber Canada Ltd.
57. Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd.
58. Surplus G Rioux
59. Swiftwood Forest Products Ltd.
60. T&P Trucking Ltd.
61. Temrex Forest Products LP; Produits Forestiers Temrex SEC.
62. Valley Cedar 2 Inc.
63. Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
64. Western Timber Products, Inc.
65. Winton Homes Ltd.
66. Woodstock Forest Products
67. WWW Timber Products Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024-18443 Filed 8-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
