Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022, 67062-67065 [2024-18442]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• International Trade Administration

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67062-67065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-122-858]


Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Results of 
the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
producers and exporters of certain softwood lumber products (softwood 
lumber) from Canada received countervailable subsidies during the 
period of review (POR), January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

DATES: Applicable August 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt or Kristen Johnson, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851 
or (202) 482-4793, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 6, 2024, Commerce published the preliminary results of 
this administrative review in the Federal Register and invited 
interested parties to comment.\1\ On April 25, 2024, Commerce extended 
the deadline for issuing the final results of this review until August 
2, 2024, which was tolled by seven days until August 9, 2024.\2\ On 
August 7, 2024, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of 
this review until August 12, 2024.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: 
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 8147 (February 6, 2024) 
(Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022,'' dated April 25, 
2024; see also Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Second Extension of Deadline for Final 
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022,'' dated 
August 7, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that occurred since the 
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\ A list 
of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included 
as Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results 
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of the Countervailing 
Duty Order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2022,'' 
dated concurrently with, and herby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Amended 
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and 
Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The product covered by this Order is certain softwood lumber 
products from Canada. For a complete description of the scope of the 
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received

    Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 
For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find 
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial 
contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that 
the subsidy is specific.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    The subsidy programs under review, and the issues raised in case 
and rebuttal briefs submitted by the interested parties, are discussed 
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Based on our analysis of the 
comments received from the interested parties, we made changes to the 
subsidy rates calculated for certain respondents. For a discussion of 
these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    Because the rates calculated for the companies selected for 
individual review are above de minimis and not based entirely on facts 
available, we applied a subsidy rate based on a weighted average of the 
subsidy rates calculated for the reviewed companies using sales data 
submitted by those companies to calculate a rate for the companies not 
selected for review. This is consistent with the methodology that we 
would use in an investigation to establish the all-others rate, 
pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
    For further information on the calculation of the non-selected 
rate, see the section titled ``Final Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected 
Companies under Review'' in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. For a 
list of the non-selected companies, see Appendix II to this notice.

Final Results of Review

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) and of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(5), we determine that the following total net 
countervailable subsidy rates exist for the period January 1, 2022, 
through December 31, 2022:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                         Company                           (percent  ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canfor Corporation and its cross-owned affiliates \7\...            6.14
J.D. Irving, Limited and its cross-owned affiliates \8\.            3.88
Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd. and Tolko Industries                 9.61
 Ltd.\9\................................................
West Fraser Mills Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates               6.85
 \10\...................................................
Non-Selected Companies \11\.............................            6.74
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 67063]]

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned 
with Canfor Corporation: Canadian Forest Products; Ltd. and Canfor 
Wood Products Marketing, Ltd.
    \8\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned 
with J.D. Irving, Limited: Miramichi Timber Holdings Limited; The 
New Brunswick Railway Company; Rothesay Paper Holdings Ltd.; and St. 
George Pulp & Paper Limited.
    \9\ Commerce finds Meadow Lake OSB Mill Corp. and several 
holding companies, the identities of which are business proprietary 
information, to be cross-owned with Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd. 
and Tolko Industries Ltd.
    \10\ Commerce finds the following companies to be cross-owned 
with West Fraser Mills Ltd.: Blue Ridge Lumber Inc.; Manning Forest 
Products, Ltd.; Sundre Forest Products Inc.; Sunpine Inc.; and West 
Fraser Alberta Holdings, Ltd.; and West Fraser Timber Co., Ltd.
    \11\ For a list of these companies, see Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these 
final results of review within five days of any public announcement or, 
if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise covered by this review. Commerce intends 
to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after 
the date of publication of the final results of this review in the 
Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). If a timely 
summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce 
intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated 
countervailing duties in the amounts shown for the companies subject to 
this review for shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of 
the final results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed 
companies, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of 
estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or 
all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash 
deposits, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results of 
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act and 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: August 12, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Final Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
VII. Analysis of Comments
    A. General Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Have Deferred the New Subsidy 
Allegations
    Comment 2: Whether Respondent Selection Was Proper
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Consider Climate Change Goals
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce's Specificity Analysis Is Consistent 
with the Law
    B. General Stumpage Issues
    Comment 5: Whether Stumpage Is an Untied Subsidy
    Comment 6: Whether to Compare Government Transaction-Specific 
Prices to an Average Benchmark Price or Offset the Less Than 
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Benefit Using Negative Benefits
    C. Alberta Stumpage Issues
    Comment 7: Whether the Alberta Stumpage Market Is Distorted
    Comment 8: Whether Private Standing Timber Prices in Nova Scotia 
Are Available in Alberta
    Comment 9: Whether the Tree Size in Nova Scotia, as Measured by 
Diameter, Is Comparable to Tree Size in Alberta
    Comment 10: Whether Spruce-Pine-Fir (SPF) Species in Nova Scotia 
Are Comparable to SPF Species in Alberta
    Comment 11: Whether the Nova Scotia Benchmark Is Comparable or 
Should Be Adjusted to Account for Log Product Characteristics
    Comment 12: Whether Nova Scotia's Forest Is Comparable to 
Alberta's Forest
    Comment 13: Whether Timber Damage Assessment Survey Prices Are 
an Appropriate Benchmark for Alberta Crown-Origin Stumpage
    Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Annualize Alberta Stumpage 
Purchase and Benchmark Prices
    Comment 15: Whether to Adjust the Nova Scotia Benchmark to 
Account for Beetle-Damaged and Fire-Damaged Timber Harvested in 
Alberta
    Comment 16: Whether Nova Scotia Is Comparable to Alberta in 
Terms of Haulage Costs and Whether to Otherwise Adjust the Nova 
Scotia Benchmark to Account for Such Differences
    Comment 17: Whether Commerce Should Make Adjustments to Stumpage 
Rates Paid by the Respondents to Account for ``Total Remuneration'' 
in Alberta and New Brunswick
    D. British Columbia (BC) Stumpage Issues
    Comment 18: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Use Washington 
State Department of Revenue (WDOR) Data for a BC Stumpage Benchmark
    Comment 19: Whether Commerce Should Make Adjustments to the WDOR 
Data
    Comment 20: Whether to Change Commerce's Calculations Relating 
to Third Party Tenures
    Comment 21: Whether to Account for BC's ``Stand-as-a-Whole'' 
Stumpage Pricing
    Comment 22: Whether Commerce's Selection of a Log Volume 
Conversion Factor Was Appropriate
    E. New Brunswick Stumpage Issues
    Comment 23: Whether the Private Stumpage Market in New Brunswick 
Is Distorted and Should Be Used as Tier-One Benchmarks
    Comment 24: Whether Commerce Should Use JDIL's Own Purchases of 
Sawlogs in Nova Scotia or the 2021-2022 Private Market Survey as a 
Benchmark for New Brunswick Crown Stumpage
    Comment 25: Whether Log Pricing Differences Between Nova Scotia 
and New Brunswick Require an Adjustment to the Nova Scotia Benchmark 
Utilized in JDIL's Stumpage Benefit Analysis
    F. Nova Scotia Stumpage Benchmark Issues
    Comment 26: Whether to Revise the Conversion Factor Used in the 
Calculation of the Nova Scotia Benchmark
    Comment 27: Whether Commerce Should Index the Nova Scotia 
Benchmark
    Comment 28: Whether Commerce Should Publicly Disclose the 
Anonymized Data that Comprise the 2021-2022 Private Market Survey
    Comment 29: Whether the Nova Scotia Benchmark Adequately 
Accounts for Regional and County-Level Differences
    Comment 30: Reliability of Nova Scotia Private-Origin Standing 
Timber Benchmark
    G. Log Export Restraint (LER) Issues

[[Page 67064]]

    Comment 31: Whether the LER in British Columbia (BC) Results in 
a Financial Contribution
    Comment 32: Whether the LER Has an Impact in BC
    H. Purchase of Goods for More Than Adequate Remuneration Issues
    Comment 33: Whether Benefits Under the BC Hydro Electricity 
Purchase Agreements (EPA) Program Are Tied to Overall Production
    Comment 34: Whether Commerce Properly Calculated the Benefit 
Conferred Under the BC Hydro EPAs
    I. Grant Program Issues
    Federal
    Comment 35: Whether the Sustainable Development Technology 
Canada Is Countervailable
    Comment 36: Whether the Forest Machines Connectivity Master 
Project Is De Facto Specific
    Comment 37: Whether the Green Jobs Program Is Countervailable
    Alberta
    Comment 38: Whether the AESO Load Shedding Program Is 
Countervailable
    Comment 39: Whether the Technology Innovation and Emissions 
Reduction Program Is Countervailable
    British Columbia
    Comment 40: Whether BC's Coloured Fuel Program Is 
Countervailable
    New Brunswick
    Comment 41: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find the 
Silviculture and License Management Programs Countervailable
    J. Tax and Other Revenue Forgone Programs Issues
    Federal
    Comment 42: Whether the Accelerated Capital Cost Allowance 
(ACCA) for Class 53 Assets Program Is Specific
    Comment 43: Whether Commerce Is Applying the Correct Benchmark 
for the ACCA for Class 53 Assets Program
    Comment 44: Whether the Benefit Methodology for the ACCA Class 
53 Assets Program Is Correct
    Comment 45: Whether the Capital Cost Allowance for Class 1 
Assets Program Is Countervailable
    Comment 46: Whether the Federal and Provincial Research and 
Development (R&D) Tax Credits Are Specific
    Comment 47: Whether Attribution of the R&D Tax Credits Is 
Correct
    Comment 48: Whether the Federal Logging Tax Credit and 
Provincial Logging Tax Credit Are Countervailable
    Alberta
    Comment 49: Whether the Tax Exempt Fuel Use Is Countervailable
    Comment 50: Whether the Property Tax Economic Obsolescence 
Allowance Is Countervailable
    Comment 51: Whether Tax Savings Under Alberta's Schedule D Are 
Countervailable
    British Columbia
    Comment 52: Whether the CleanBC's Industrial Incentive Program 
Is Countervailable
    New Brunswick
    Comment 53: Whether the Gasoline and Motive Fuel Tax (GMFT) 
Program Provides a Financial Contribution in the Form of Revenue 
Forgone or Can Be Found Specific
    Comment 54: Whether Commerce Should Revise the GMFT Benefit 
Calculation
    Comment 55: Whether Commerce Should Find New Brunswick's 
Property Tax Incentives for Private Forest Producers Program 
Countervailable
    Comment 56: Whether Commerce Should Find the Large Industrial 
Renewable Energy Purchase Program Countervailable
    K. Company-Specific Issues
    Comment 57: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated the Benefit 
JDIL Received from the Atlantic Investment Tax Credit, Scientific 
Research and Experimental Development, and New Brunswick R&D Tax 
Credit Programs
    Comment 58: Whether Commerce Should Correct an Error in Tolko's 
BC Coloured Fuel Calculation
    Comment 59: Whether Commerce Should Correct Errors in West 
Fraser's BC Stumpage Calculation
VIII. Recommendation

Appendix II

Non-Selected Exporters/Producers

1 0752615 B.C Ltd; Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc, DBA Fraserview 
Cedar Products
2 10104704 Manitoba Ltd O/A Woodstock Forest Products
3 1074712 BC Ltd. (Quadra Cedar)
4 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.; AM Lumber Brokerage
5 Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd.
6 Adwood Manufacturing Ltd.
7 AJ Forest Products Ltd.
8 Aler Forest Products, Ltd.
9 Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
10 Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
11 Antrim Cedar Corporation
12 Aquila Cedar Products Ltd.
13 Arbec Lumber Inc. (aka Arbec Bois Doeuvre Inc.)
14 Aspen Pacific Industries Inc.
15 Aspen Planers Ltd.
16 B&L Forest Products Ltd.
17 B.B. Pallets Inc. (aka Les Palettes B.B. Inc.)
18 Babine Forest Products Limited
19 Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
20 Barrette-Chapais Ltee
21 BarretteWood Inc.
22 Benoit & Dionne Produits Forestiers Ltee (aka Benoit & Dionne 
Forest Products Ltd.)
23 Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
24 Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
25 Bois Aise de Montreal Inc.
26 Bois Bonsai Inc.
27 Bois D'oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka Cedrico Lumber Inc.)
28 Bois Daaquam inc. (aka Daaquam Lumber Inc.)
29 Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc. (aka SPEC Wood & Marketing 
Solution or SPEC Wood and Marketing Solutions Inc.)
30 Bois Weedon Inc.
31 Boisaco Inc.
32 Boscus Canada Inc.
33 Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.
34 BPWood Ltd.
35 Bramwood Forest Inc.
36 Brink Forest Products Ltd.
37 Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
38 Busque & Laflamme Inc.
39 Canadian Bavarian Millwork & Lumber Ltd.
40 Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd.
41 Carrier & Begin Inc.
42 Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
43 Carrier Lumber Ltd.
44 Carter Forest Products Inc.
45 Cedarland Forest Products Ltd.
46 Cedarline Industries Ltd.
47 Central Alberta Pallet Supply
48 Central Cedar Ltd.
49 Centurion Lumber Ltd.
50 Chaleur Forest Products Inc.
51 Chaleur Forest Products LP
52 Channel-ex Trading Corporation
53 CHAP Alliance Inc.
54 Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd
55 Clermond Hamel Ltee
56 CLG Enterprises Inc.
57 CNH Products Inc.
58 Columbia River Shake & Shingle Ltd.; Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 
dba The Teal Jones Group
59 Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
60 Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
61 Coulson Manufacturing Ltd.
62 Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
63 CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed
64 CWP Industriel Inc. (aka CWP--Industriel Inc.)
65 D & D Pallets Ltd.
66 Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
67 Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
68 Deep Cove Forest Products, Inc.
69 Delco Forest Products Ltd.
70 Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
71 Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
72 DH Manufacturing Inc.
73 Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
74 Downie Timber Ltd.
75 Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
76 EACOM Timber Corporation
77 East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
78 Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
79 ER Probyn Export Ltd.
80 Falcon Lumber Ltd.
81 Fontaine Inc.; Gestion Natanis Inc.; Les Placements Jean-Paul 
Fontaine Ltee; Placements Nicolas Fontaine Inc.
82 Foothills Forest Products Inc.
83 Fort St. James Forest Products Limited Partnership
84 Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
85 FraserWood Industries Ltd.
86 Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
87 Galloway Lumber Company Ltd.
88 Gilbert Smith Forest Products Ltd.
89 Goldwood Industries Ltd.
90 Goodfellow Inc.
91 Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
92 Greendale Industries Inc.
93 GreenFirst Forest Products (QC) Inc.
94 Greenwell Resources Inc.
95 Griff Building Supplies Ltd.
96 Groupe Crete Chertsey Inc.
97 Groupe Crete Division St-Faustin Inc.
98 Groupe Lebel Inc.
99 H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
100 Haida Forest Products Ltd.
101 Halo Sawmill Manufacturing Limited Partnership
102 Hampton Tree Farms, LLC, dba Hampton Lumber Sales Canada
103 Hornepayne Lumber LP

[[Page 67065]]

104 Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc.
105 Hy Mark Wood Products Inc.
106 Independent Building Materials Distribution Inc.
107 Interfor Corporation
108 Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd.
109 Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
110 J&G Log Works Ltd.
111 J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
112 Jan Woodlands (2001) Inc.
113 Jasco Forest Products Ltd.
114 Jazz Forest Products Ltd.
115 Jhajj Lumber Corporation
116 Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
117 Kan Wood, Ltd.
118 Kebois Ltee/Ltd
119 Kelfor Industries Ltd.
120 Kermode Forest Products Ltd.
121 Keystone Timber Ltd.
122 La Crete Sawmills Ltd.
123 Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
124 Langevin Forest Products Inc.
125 Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
126 Leisure Lumber Ltd.
127 Les Bois d'oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier Inc.
128 Les Bois Martek Lumber
129 Les Chantiers de Chibougamau Ltd./Ltee
130 Les Industries P.F. Inc.
131 Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
132 Lignum Forest Products LLP
133 Linwood Homes Ltd.
134 Lonestar Lumber lnc.
135 Lulumco Inc.
136 Magnum Forest Products, Ltd.
137 Maibec Inc.
138 Manitou Forest Products Ltd
139 Marwood Ltd.
140 Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
141 Metrie Canada Ltd.
142 Mid Valley Lumber Specialties Ltd.
143 Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
144 Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
145 Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
146 Mirax Lumber Products Ltd.
147 Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.; J.F.S.R. Inc.; Gestion C.A. 
Rancourt Inc.; Gestion J.F. Rancourt Inc.; Gestion Suzie Rancourt 
Inc.; Gestion P.H.Q. Inc.; 9331-3419 Quebec Inc.; 9331-3468 Quebec 
Inc.; SPQ Inc.
148 Monterra Lumber Mills Limited
149 Morwood Forest Products Inc.
150 Multicedre ltee
151 Murray Brothers Lumber Company Ltd
152 Nakina Lumber Inc.
153 National Forest Products Ltd.
154 Nicholson and Cates Ltd.
155 NorSask Forest Products Limited Partnership; NorSask Forest 
Products Inc.
156 North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Abbotsford, 
British Columbia)
157 North Enderby Timber Ltd.
158 Northland Forest Products Ltd.
159 Oakwood Manufacturing, A Division of Weston Forest Products Inc.
160 Olympic Industries, Inc.; Olympic Industries ULC \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ On March 21, 2023, Olympic Industries, Inc. and Olympic 
Industries ULC (collectively, Olympic) notified Commerce that 
Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Code, Olympic Industries ULC-Reman, and 
Olympic Industries ULC-Reman Code are no longer used by Olympic to 
export softwood lumber to the United States. See Olympic's Letter, 
``Response to Department of Commerce's Clarification Request,'' 
dated March 21, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

161 Pacific NorthWest Lumber Ltd.
162 Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
163 PalletSource Inc.
164 Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
165 Partap Forest Products Ltd.
166 Peak Industries (Cranbrook) Ltd.
167 Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
168 Pine Ideas Ltd.
169 Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd.
170 Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
171 Power Wood Corp.
172 Precision Cedar Products Corp.
173 Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc.
174 Produits Matra Inc.; Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.; Bois Ouvre de 
Beauceville (1992), Inc.
175 Promobois G.D.S. Inc.
176 R.A. Green Lumber Ltd.
177 Rayonier A.M. Canada GP
178 Rembos Inc.
179 Rene Bernard inc.
180 Resolute FP Canada Inc.; 9192-8515 Quebec Inc.; Abitibi-Bowater 
Canada Inc.; Bowater Canadian Ltd.; Produits Forestiers Maurice 
SEC.; Resolute Forest Products Inc.
181 Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
182 River City Remanufacturing Inc.
183 S&R Sawmills Ltd.
184 San Group
185 San Industries Ltd.
186 Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
187 Scierie St-Michel Inc.
188 Scierie West Brome Inc.
189 Scott Lumber Sales Ltd.
190 Shakertown Corp.
191 Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
192 Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
193 Skana Forest Products Ltd.
194 Skeena Sawmills Ltd.
195 South Beach Trading Inc.
196 South Coast Reman Ltd.
197 Southcoast Millwork Ltd.
198 Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc. (aka SBC)
199 Spruceland Millworks Inc.
200 Sundher Timber Products Inc.
201 Surrey Cedar Ltd.
202 Taan Forest Limited Partnership (aka Taan Forest Products)
203 Taiga Building Products Ltd.
204 Tall Tree Lumber Company
205 Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
206 TG Wood Products
207 The Wood Source Inc.
208 Top Quality Lumber Ltd.
209 Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
210 Triad Forest Products Ltd.
211 Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
212 Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
213 Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
214 Usine Sartigan Inc.
215 Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC
216 Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd.
217 Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products Ltd.
218 Vanderwell Contractors (1971) Ltd.
219 Visscher Lumber Inc.
220 W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
221 West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
222 West Coast Panel Cutters
223 Western Forest Products Inc.
224 Western Lumber Sales Limited
225 Westminster Industries Ltd.
226 Weston Forest Products Inc.
227 Westrend Exteriors Inc.
228 Weyerhaeuser Co.
229 White River Forest Products L.P.
230 Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
231 Woodstock Forest Products
232 Woodtone Specialties Inc.

[FR Doc. 2024-18442 Filed 8-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P