Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Taiwan: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 66683-66686 [2024-18411]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Notices
listed above will be that established in
the final results of this review, except if
the rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
therefore, de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
which case the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed companies not covered in this
review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific
cash deposit rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the investigation of sales at
LTFV, but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established
for the most recently completed segment
of this proceeding for the producer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 7.33
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.8 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties has occurred and
the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or an increase
in the amount of antidumping duties by
the amount of countervailing duties.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Order, 86 FR at 7530.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Aug 15, 2024
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 9, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rate for Non-Selected Respondent
V. Changes from the Preliminary Results
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Lucchini’s ‘‘Channel 1’’ Sales
to the United States
Comment 2: Reconciliation of LIND’s
Reported Costs
Comment 3: Roselli’s Status as a NonSelected Respondent
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–18416 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Notification to Importers
8 See
Notification to Interested Parties
Jkt 262001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–831]
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils
From Taiwan: Preliminary Results,
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments, and Rescission, in Part, of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2022–2023
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that sales of stainless steel
sheet and strip in coils (SSSSC) from
Taiwan were sold at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR),
July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.
Additionally, Commerce is rescinding
this review, in part, with respect to
certain companies. Commerce also
preliminarily determines that certain
companies for which we initiated a
review had no shipments during the
POR. We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable August 16, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Genevieve Coen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66683
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3251.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 27, 1999, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty (AD) order on SSSSC
from Taiwan.1 On July 7, 2023,
Commerce published in the Federal
Register a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
Order.2 On September 11, 2023, based
on a timely request for review, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an
administrative review.3 This review
covers 61 producers and/or exporters of
the subject merchandise.4 Commerce
selected Tung Mung Development Co
Ltd. (Tung Mung) and Yieh Trading
Corporation (Yieh Corporation) for
individual examination.5 The producers
and/or exporters not selected for
individual examination are listed in the
‘‘Preliminary Results of the Review’’
section of this notice.
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled
certain deadlines in this administrative
proceeding by seven days.6 The
deadline for the preliminary results is
now August 6, 2024. For a complete
description of the events that followed
the initiation of this review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.7
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order
is certain stainless steel sheet and strip
in coils. For a complete description of
the scope of the Order see Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B)
and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Pursuant to sections
776(a) and (b) of the Act, Commerce
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order;
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from United
Kingdom, Taiwan, and South Korea, 64 FR 40555
(July 27, 1999) (Order).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual
Service List, 88 FR 42693 (July 7, 2023).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR
62322 (September 11, 2023) (Initiation Notice).
4 Id.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’
dated March 4, 2023.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip in Coils from Taiwan; 2022–2023,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
66684
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Notices
preliminarily relied entirely upon facts
otherwise available with adverse
inferences for Yieh Corporation.
For a complete description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is attached as
Appendix I to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Rescission of Administrative Review, in
Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is
Commerce’s practice to rescind an
administrative review of an AD order
when there are no suspended entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.8
Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the AD
assessment rate calculated for the
review period.9 Therefore, for an
administrative review to be conducted,
there must be a suspended entry that
Commerce can instruct CBP to liquidate
at the AD assessment rate calculated for
the review period.10
There were no suspended entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for
the 52 companies listed in Appendix
II.11 On December 11, 2023, Commerce
notified all interested parties of its
intent to rescind the administrative
review in part with respect to these
companies, because there were no
suspended entries of subject
merchandise during the POR and
invited interested parties to comment.12
No interested party submitted
comments in response to this notice.
Accordingly, in the absence of
8 See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the
Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758
(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy
Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Federal Republic
of Germany: Recission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4154
(January 24, 2023).
9 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
10 See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
11 This list includes two companies, Yieh Mau
Corporation (Yieh Mau) and Yieh Phui Enterprise
Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui) which submitted no shipment
certifications but did not have suspended entries of
subject merchandise during the POR.
12 See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind
Review, In Part,’’ dated December 11, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
suspended entries of subject
merchandise during the POR for these
companies for which this review was
initiated, we are, hereby, rescinding this
administrative review, in part, with
respect to these 52 companies, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if a party who requested the review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. On
December 11, 2023, North American
Stainless and Outokumpu Stainless
USA, LLC, (collectively, the domestic
interested parties) timely withdrew their
request for an administrative review
with respect to Lien Kuo Metal
Industries Co., Ltd. and S More Steel
Materials Co., Ltd.13 Because no other
parties requested a review of these two
companies, we are rescinding the
administrative review in part, with
respect to these two companies, as
noted in Appendix II.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Yieh United Steel Corporation
(YUSCO) reported that it made no sales
or exports of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR.14
Additionally, Tung Mung reported that
it had no sales of subject merchandise
to the United States during the POR.15
CBP data indicated that entries of
subject merchandise were made under
the CBP 10-digit case reference file
numbers for YUSCO and Tung Mung.
We requested additional information
from CBP including entry summary
documents for certain POR entries
attributed to Tung Mung and YUSCO,
respectively.16 Based on an analysis of
information on the record, we
preliminary determine that Tung Mung
and YUSCO made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR. Further,
consistent with Commerce’s practice,
we find that it is not appropriate to
rescind the review with respect to Tung
Mung and YUSCO, but rather to
13 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter,
‘‘Domestic Interested Parties’ Partial Withdrawal of
Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
December 11, 2023.
14 See YUSCO’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment
Certification,’’ dated October 11, 2023.
15 See Tung Mung’s Letters, ‘‘Aluminum
Extrusions from China {sic},’’ dated April 1, 2024;
‘‘Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils (SSSSC)
from Taiwan,’’ dated April 17, 2024.
16 See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection Information,’’ dated May 3,
2024; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Release of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection Information,’’ dated
July 17, 2024.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complete the review and issue
appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP based on the final results of
review.17
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
The Act and Commerce’s regulations
do not address the rate to be applied to
companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its
examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Act. Generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in a market economy
investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for companies that
were not selected for individual
examination in an administrative
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of
the Act, the all-others rate is normally
‘‘an amount equal to the weighted
average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established
for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero or de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely {on the
basis of facts available}.’’
Section 735(c)(5)(B) further provides
if the estimated weighted average
dumping margins established for all
exporters and producers individually
investigated are zero, de minimis, or are
determined entirely by application of
facts available, Commerce may use any
reasonable method to establish the
estimated all-others rate for exporters
and producers not individually
investigated, including averaging the
estimated weighted average dumping
margins determined for the exporters
and producers individually
investigated.
We preliminarily based the weightedaverage dumping margins for Yieh
Corporation, a mandatory respondent in
this review, entirely on adverse facts
available (AFA), as discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Further, we preliminarily find that the
mandatory respondent’s total AFA
dumping margin of 21.10 percent is
reasonably reflective of the non-selected
companies’ potential dumping margins
during the POR. Therefore, we
preliminarily assigned the margin of
21.10 percent to the four companies not
individually examined. For further
discussion, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
17 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Notices
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the
following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023:
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Exporter or producer
Yieh Trading Corporation ...........
Review-Specific Average Rate
Applicable to the Following
Companies:
Chia Far Industrial Factory
Co., Ltd. ...............................
Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Company Ltd. ..............................
Tang Eng Iron Works Company, Ltd. .............................
Yu Ting Industries Co., Ltd. ....
21.10
21.10
21.10
21.10
21.10
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a
preliminary determination within five
days of any public announcement or, if
there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of
publication of the notice of preliminary
determination in the Federal Register,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, because Commerce
preliminarily applied total AFA to the
individually examined company, Yieh
Corporation, in this administrative
review, and the applied AFA rate is
based on a rate calculated for a
respondent in a prior segment of this
proceeding, there are no calculations to
disclose.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs or other written comments to
Commerce no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice.18
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed no later
than five days after the time limit for
filing case briefs.19 Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) a statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.20 As provided under 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings, we have encouraged
18 See
19 CFR 351.309(c).
19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative
Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings;
Final Rule, 88 FR 67069 (September 29, 2023) (APO
and Service Final Rule).
20 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
19 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their brief that
should be limited to five pages total,
including footnotes. In this review, we
instead request that interested parties
provide, at the beginning of their briefs,
a public executive summary for each
issue raised in their briefs.21 Further, we
request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue
to no more than 450 words, no
including citations. We intend to use
the public executive summaries as the
basis of the comment summaries
included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the
final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested
parties include footnotes for relevant
citations in the public executive
summary of each issue. Note that
Commerce has amended certain of its
requirements pertaining to the service of
documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).22
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce, filed
electronically via ACCESS. Hearing
requests should contain: (1) the party’s
name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
issues raised in the respective case
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
Commerce intends to hold the hearing
at a date and time to be determined and
will notify the parties through
ACCESS.23 Parties should confirm the
date, time, and location of the hearing
two days before the scheduled date.
All submissions, including case and
rebuttal briefs, as well as hearing
requests, should be filed using ACCESS.
An electronically-filed document must
be received successfully in its entirety
by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
on the established deadline.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act, upon completion of the
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.24
For the companies that were not
selected for individual review, we
intend to assign an assessment rate
21 We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an
argument that Commerce would normally address
in a comment of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
22 See APO and Service Final Rule.
23 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
24 See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66685
based on the methodology described in
the ‘‘Rate for Non-Selected Companies’’
section, above. The final results of this
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the
final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable.25
Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’
practice will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced
by companies included in these final
results of review for which the reviewed
companies did not know that the
merchandise they sold to the
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading
company, or exporter) was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.26
Further, if we continue to find in the
final results that Tung Mung and
YUSCO had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended
entries that entered under their AD case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) at
the all-others rate if there is no rate for
the intermediate company(ies) involved
in the transaction.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective for all shipments of
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for the exporters listed
above will be that established in the
final results of this review, except if the
rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
therefore, de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
which case the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
25 See
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
26 For
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
66686
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2024 / Notices
investigated companies not
participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review or previous
segment, but the manufacturer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recentlycompleted segment for the manufacturer
of the subject merchandise; and (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 12.61
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.27 These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Final Results of Review
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis
raised in any written briefs, not later
than 120 days after the publication date
of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1), unless otherwise
extended.28
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 5, 2024.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rescission of Review, In Part
V. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
27 See
28 See
Order.
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Aug 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
VI. Companies Not Selected for Individual
Examination
VII. Discussion of the Methodology:
Application of Facts Available and Use
of Adverse Inferences
VIII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Rescinded From Review
Companies With No Suspended Entries
1. Broad International Resources Ltd.
2. Chain Chon Industrial Co., Ltd.
3. Cheng Feng Plastic Co., Ltd.
4. Chien Shing Stainless Co.
5. China Steel Corporation
6. Chung Hung Steel Corp
7. Chyang Dah Stainless Co., Ltd.
8. Dah Shi Metal Industrial Co., Ltd.
9. Da-Tsai Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
10. DB Schenker (HK) Ltd. Taiwan Branch.
11. DHV Technical Information Co., Ltd.
12. Froch Enterprises Co., Ltd.
13. Gang Jou Enterprise Co., Ltd.
14. Genn Hann Stainless Steel Enterprise Co.,
Ltd.
15. Goang Jau Shing Enterprise Co., Ltd.
16. Goldioceans International Co., Ltd.
17. Gotosteel Ltd.
18. Grace Alloy Corp.
19. Hung Shuh Enterprises Co., Ltd.
20. Hwang Dah Steel Inc.
21. Jie Jin Stainless Steel Industry Co., Ltd.
22. JJSE Co., Ltd.
23. KNS Enterprise Co., Ltd.
24. Lancer Ent. Co., Ltd.
25. Lien Chy Laminated Metal Co., Ltd.
26. Lih Chan Steel Co., Ltd.
27. Lung An Stainless Steel Ind. Co., Ltd.
28. Master United Corp.
29. Maytun International Corp.
30. NKS Steel Ind. Ltd.
31. PFP Taiwan Co., Ltd.
32. Po Chwen Metal.
33. Prime Rocks Co., Ltd.
34. Shih Yuan Stainless Steel Enterprise Co.,
Ltd.
35. Silineal Enterprises Co., Ltd.
36. Stanch Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
37. Tah Lee Special Steel Co., Ltd.
38. Taiwan Nippon Steel Stainless
39. Teng Yao Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.
40. Tibest International Inc.
41. Ton Yi Industrial Corp
42. Tsai See Enterprise Co., Ltd.
43. Vasteel Enterprises Co., Ltd.
44. Vulcan Industrial Corporation
45. Wuu Jing Enterprise Co., Ltd.
46. Yc Inox Co., Ltd.
47. Yes Stainless International Co., Ltd.
48. Yieh Mau Corporation
49. Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd.
50. Yue Seng Industrial Co., Ltd.
51. Yuen Chang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
52. Yung Fa Steel & Iron Industry Co., Ltd.
Companies for Which Review Requests Were
Withdrawn
1. Lien Kuo Metal Industries Co., Ltd.
2. S More Steel Materials Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024–18411 Filed 8–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Socioeconomics of Coral
Reef Conservation, U.S. Virgin Islands
2025 Survey
The Department of Commerce will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication
of this notice. We invite the general
public and other Federal agencies to
comment on proposed, and continuing
information collections, which helps us
assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. This
notice pertains to an individual survey
under the approved collection of
information for Socioeconomics of Coral
Reef Conservation. Public comments
were previously requested via the
Federal Register on January 5, 2024
during a 60-day comment period and on
April 15, 2024 during an additional 30day comment period. This notice allows
for an additional 30 days for public
comments with respect to the U.S.
Virgin Islands survey.
Agency: National Oceanic &
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
Title: Socioeconomics of Coral Reef
Conservation, U.S. Virgin Islands 2025
Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0646.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular [This is a
request for revision and extension.]
Number of Respondents: 1,125.
Average Hours per Response: 20
minutes (0.33 hours).
Total Annual Burden Hours: 375
hours.
Needs and Uses: This request is for a
revision and extension to an approved
collection of information, OMB Control
Number 0648–0646, under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., and implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320. This
previously-approved information
collection assists NOAA in the
administration of the National Coral
Reef Monitoring Program (NCRMP),
which was established by the NOAA
Coral Reef Conservation Program
(CRCP) under the authority of the Coral
Reef Conservation Act of 2000, 16
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66683-66686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18411]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-831]
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Taiwan: Preliminary
Results, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission, in
Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that sales of stainless steel sheet and strip in coils
(SSSSC) from Taiwan were sold at less than normal value during the
period of review (POR), July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.
Additionally, Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect
to certain companies. Commerce also preliminarily determines that
certain companies for which we initiated a review had no shipments
during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable August 16, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Genevieve Coen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3251.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 27, 1999, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty (AD) order on SSSSC from Taiwan.\1\ On July 7, 2023,
Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the Order.\2\ On September 11,
2023, based on a timely request for review, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review.\3\ This review
covers 61 producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise.\4\
Commerce selected Tung Mung Development Co Ltd. (Tung Mung) and Yieh
Trading Corporation (Yieh Corporation) for individual examination.\5\
The producers and/or exporters not selected for individual examination
are listed in the ``Preliminary Results of the Review'' section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Stainless Steel Sheet
and Strip in Coils from United Kingdom, Taiwan, and South Korea, 64
FR 40555 (July 27, 1999) (Order).
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review and Join Annual Service List, 88 FR 42693 (July 7, 2023).
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 62322 (September 11, 2023) (Initiation
Notice).
\4\ Id.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated March 4,
2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this
administrative proceeding by seven days.\6\ The deadline for the
preliminary results is now August 6, 2024. For a complete description
of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Taiwan; 2022-2023,''
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order is certain stainless steel
sheet and strip in coils. For a complete description of the scope of
the Order see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, Commerce
[[Page 66684]]
preliminarily relied entirely upon facts otherwise available with
adverse inferences for Yieh Corporation.
For a complete description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as
Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to
rescind an administrative review of an AD order when there are no
suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\8\ Normally,
upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are
liquidated at the AD assessment rate calculated for the review
period.\9\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted,
there must be a suspended entry that Commerce can instruct CBP to
liquidate at the AD assessment rate calculated for the review
period.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the Republic of Korea:
Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 88 FR
24758 (April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-
to-Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of
Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January
24, 2023).
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the
POR for the 52 companies listed in Appendix II.\11\ On December 11,
2023, Commerce notified all interested parties of its intent to rescind
the administrative review in part with respect to these companies,
because there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during
the POR and invited interested parties to comment.\12\ No interested
party submitted comments in response to this notice. Accordingly, in
the absence of suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR
for these companies for which this review was initiated, we are,
hereby, rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect to
these 52 companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ This list includes two companies, Yieh Mau Corporation
(Yieh Mau) and Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui) which
submitted no shipment certifications but did not have suspended
entries of subject merchandise during the POR.
\12\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In
Part,'' dated December 11, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. On
December 11, 2023, North American Stainless and Outokumpu Stainless
USA, LLC, (collectively, the domestic interested parties) timely
withdrew their request for an administrative review with respect to
Lien Kuo Metal Industries Co., Ltd. and S More Steel Materials Co.,
Ltd.\13\ Because no other parties requested a review of these two
companies, we are rescinding the administrative review in part, with
respect to these two companies, as noted in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Domestic
Interested Parties' Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated December 11, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Yieh United Steel Corporation (YUSCO) reported that it made no
sales or exports of subject merchandise to the United States during the
POR.\14\ Additionally, Tung Mung reported that it had no sales of
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\15\ CBP data
indicated that entries of subject merchandise were made under the CBP
10-digit case reference file numbers for YUSCO and Tung Mung. We
requested additional information from CBP including entry summary
documents for certain POR entries attributed to Tung Mung and YUSCO,
respectively.\16\ Based on an analysis of information on the record, we
preliminary determine that Tung Mung and YUSCO made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Further,
consistent with Commerce's practice, we find that it is not appropriate
to rescind the review with respect to Tung Mung and YUSCO, but rather
to complete the review and issue appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP based on the final results of review.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See YUSCO's Letter, ``No Shipment Certification,'' dated
October 11, 2023.
\15\ See Tung Mung's Letters, ``Aluminum Extrusions from China
{sic{time} ,'' dated April 1, 2024; ``Stainless Steel Sheet and
Strip in Coils (SSSSC) from Taiwan,'' dated April 17, 2024.
\16\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Information,'' dated May 3, 2024; see also Memorandum,
``Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Information,'' dated
July 17, 2024.
\17\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the rate to be
applied to companies not selected for individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for companies that were not selected for
individual examination in an administrative review. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping
margins established for exporters and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins
determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .''
Section 735(c)(5)(B) further provides if the estimated weighted
average dumping margins established for all exporters and producers
individually investigated are zero, de minimis, or are determined
entirely by application of facts available, Commerce may use any
reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for
exporters and producers not individually investigated, including
averaging the estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for
the exporters and producers individually investigated.
We preliminarily based the weighted-average dumping margins for
Yieh Corporation, a mandatory respondent in this review, entirely on
adverse facts available (AFA), as discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. Further, we preliminarily find that the mandatory
respondent's total AFA dumping margin of 21.10 percent is reasonably
reflective of the non-selected companies' potential dumping margins
during the POR. Therefore, we preliminarily assigned the margin of
21.10 percent to the four companies not individually examined. For
further discussion, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
[[Page 66685]]
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the following estimated weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2022, through June
30, 2023:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Exporter or producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yieh Trading Corporation.................................... 21.10
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following
Companies:
Chia Far Industrial Factory Co., Ltd...................... 21.10
Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Company Ltd........................ 21.10
Tang Eng Iron Works Company, Ltd.......................... 21.10
Yu Ting Industries Co., Ltd............................... 21.10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a preliminary determination within five
days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of the notice of
preliminary determination in the Federal Register, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because Commerce preliminarily applied
total AFA to the individually examined company, Yieh Corporation, in
this administrative review, and the applied AFA rate is based on a rate
calculated for a respondent in a prior segment of this proceeding,
there are no calculations to disclose.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs or other written comments
to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\18 \ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for
filing case briefs.\19\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument:
(1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and
(3) a table of authorities.\20\ As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)
and (d)(2), in prior proceedings, we have encouraged interested parties
to provide an executive summary of their brief that should be limited
to five pages total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead
request that interested parties provide, at the beginning of their
briefs, a public executive summary for each issue raised in their
briefs.\21\ Further, we request that interested parties limit their
public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, no
including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for
relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note
that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule, 88 FR 67069 (September
29, 2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\20\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\21\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\22\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Acting Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
filed electronically via ACCESS. Hearing requests should contain: (1)
the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the respective case
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold
the hearing at a date and time to be determined and will notify the
parties through ACCESS.\23\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All submissions, including case and rebuttal briefs, as well as
hearing requests, should be filed using ACCESS. An electronically-filed
document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, upon completion of the
administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies that were not selected for individual review, we
intend to assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described
in the ``Rate for Non-Selected Companies'' section, above. The final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in
these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not
know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a
reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, if we continue to find in the final results that Tung Mung
and YUSCO had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that entered under
their AD case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the exporters listed above will
be that established in the final results of this review, except if the
rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate
will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
[[Page 66686]]
investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published
for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which the
company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or previous segment, but the manufacturer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently-
completed segment for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and
(4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 12.61 percent, the all-others rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation.\27\ These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written
briefs, not later than 120 days after the publication date of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1), unless otherwise extended.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 5, 2024.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rescission of Review, In Part
V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
VI. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
VII. Discussion of the Methodology: Application of Facts Available
and Use of Adverse Inferences
VIII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Rescinded From Review
Companies With No Suspended Entries
1. Broad International Resources Ltd.
2. Chain Chon Industrial Co., Ltd.
3. Cheng Feng Plastic Co., Ltd.
4. Chien Shing Stainless Co.
5. China Steel Corporation
6. Chung Hung Steel Corp
7. Chyang Dah Stainless Co., Ltd.
8. Dah Shi Metal Industrial Co., Ltd.
9. Da-Tsai Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
10. DB Schenker (HK) Ltd. Taiwan Branch.
11. DHV Technical Information Co., Ltd.
12. Froch Enterprises Co., Ltd.
13. Gang Jou Enterprise Co., Ltd.
14. Genn Hann Stainless Steel Enterprise Co., Ltd.
15. Goang Jau Shing Enterprise Co., Ltd.
16. Goldioceans International Co., Ltd.
17. Gotosteel Ltd.
18. Grace Alloy Corp.
19. Hung Shuh Enterprises Co., Ltd.
20. Hwang Dah Steel Inc.
21. Jie Jin Stainless Steel Industry Co., Ltd.
22. JJSE Co., Ltd.
23. KNS Enterprise Co., Ltd.
24. Lancer Ent. Co., Ltd.
25. Lien Chy Laminated Metal Co., Ltd.
26. Lih Chan Steel Co., Ltd.
27. Lung An Stainless Steel Ind. Co., Ltd.
28. Master United Corp.
29. Maytun International Corp.
30. NKS Steel Ind. Ltd.
31. PFP Taiwan Co., Ltd.
32. Po Chwen Metal.
33. Prime Rocks Co., Ltd.
34. Shih Yuan Stainless Steel Enterprise Co., Ltd.
35. Silineal Enterprises Co., Ltd.
36. Stanch Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
37. Tah Lee Special Steel Co., Ltd.
38. Taiwan Nippon Steel Stainless
39. Teng Yao Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.
40. Tibest International Inc.
41. Ton Yi Industrial Corp
42. Tsai See Enterprise Co., Ltd.
43. Vasteel Enterprises Co., Ltd.
44. Vulcan Industrial Corporation
45. Wuu Jing Enterprise Co., Ltd.
46. Yc Inox Co., Ltd.
47. Yes Stainless International Co., Ltd.
48. Yieh Mau Corporation
49. Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd.
50. Yue Seng Industrial Co., Ltd.
51. Yuen Chang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd.
52. Yung Fa Steel & Iron Industry Co., Ltd.
Companies for Which Review Requests Were Withdrawn
1. Lien Kuo Metal Industries Co., Ltd.
2. S More Steel Materials Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024-18411 Filed 8-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P