Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Respiratory Protection Program at Coal Mines, 66452-66453 [2024-18182]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
66452
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 158 / Thursday, August 15, 2024 / Notices
Tunney Act, a court must be mindful
that [t]he government need not prove
that the settlements will perfectly
remedy the alleged antitrust harms[;] it
need only provide a factual basis for
concluding that the settlements are
reasonably adequate remedies for the
alleged harms.’’) (internal quotations
omitted).
‘‘[A] proposed decree must be
approved even if it falls short of the
remedy the court would impose on its
own, as long as it falls within the range
of acceptability or is ‘within the reaches
of public interest.’ ’’ United States v.
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131,
151 (D.D.C. 1982); Apple, 889 F. Supp.
2d at 637 n.10; see also United States v.
U.S. Airways Grp., Inc., 38 F. Supp. 3d
69, 74 (D.D.C. 2014) (noting that room
must be made for the government to
grant concessions in the negotiation
process for settlements) (citing
Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1461); Morgan
Stanley, 881 F. Supp. 2d at 568
(approving the consent decree even
though the court may have imposed a
greater remedy). To meet this standard,
‘‘it is necessary only that the
submissions provide an ample ‘factual
foundation for the government’s
decisions such that its conclusions
regarding the proposed settlement are
reasonable.’ ’’ Apple, 889 F. Supp. 2d at
639 (citing Keyspan, 763 F. Supp. 2d at
637–38).
Moreover, a court’s role under the
APPA is limited to reviewing the
remedy in relationship to the violations
that the United States has alleged in its
Complaint and the APPA does not
authorize a court to ‘‘construct [its] own
hypothetical case and then evaluate the
decree against that case.’’ Microsoft, 56
F.3d at 1459; see also Morgan Stanley,
881 F. Supp. 2d at 567 (‘‘A court must
limit its review to the issues in the
complaint and give ‘due respect to the
[Government’s] perception of . . . its
case.’ ’’) (citing Microsoft, 56 F.3d at
1461); United States v. InBev N.V./S.A.,
No. 08–1965, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
84787, at *20 (D.D.C. Aug. 11, 2009)
(‘‘[T]he ‘public interest’ is not to be
measured by comparing the violations
alleged in the complaint against those
the court believes could have, or even
should have, been alleged.’’). Because
the ‘‘court’s authority to review the
decree depends entirely on the
government’s exercising its
prosecutorial discretion by bringing a
case in the first place,’’ it follows that
‘‘the court is only authorized to review
the decree itself,’’ and not to ‘‘effectively
redraft the complaint’’ to inquire into
other matters that the United States did
not pursue. Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1459–
60. Courts cannot look beyond the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Aug 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
complaint in making the public interest
determination unless the complaint
underlying the decree is drafted so
narrowly such that its entry would
appear ‘‘ ‘to make a mockery of judicial
power.’ ’’ Apple, 889 F. Supp. 2d at 631
(citing United States v. SBC Commc’ns,
Inc., 489 F. Supp. 2d 1, 14 (D.D.C.
2007)).
In its 2004 amendments to the APPA,
Congress made clear its intent to
preserve the practical benefits of
utilizing consent decrees in antitrust
enforcement, adding the unambiguous
instruction that ‘‘[n]othing in this
section shall be construed to require the
court to conduct an evidentiary hearing
or to require the court to permit anyone
to intervene.’’ 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(2); see
also Apple, 889 F. Supp. 2d at 633
(declining to hold evidentiary hearing
and finding ‘‘[a] hearing would serve
only to delay the proceedings
unnecessarily.’’); U.S. Airways, 38 F.
Supp. 3d at 75 (indicating that a court
is not required to hold an evidentiary
hearing or to permit intervenors as part
of its review under the Tunney Act).
The language wrote into the statute
what Congress intended when it enacted
the Tunney Act in 1974, as Senator
Tunney explained: ‘‘[t]he court is
nowhere compelled to go to trial or to
engage in extended proceedings which
might have the effect of vitiating the
benefits of prompt and less costly
settlement through the consent decree
process.’’ 119 Cong. Rec. 24, 598 (1973)
(statement of Sen. Tunney). Rather, the
procedure for the public interest
determination is left to the discretion of
the court, with the recognition that the
court’s ‘‘scope of review remains
sharply proscribed by precedent and the
nature of Tunney Act proceedings.’’
SBC Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 11;
see also Apple, 889 F. Supp. 2d at 632
(‘‘[P]rosecutorial functions vested solely
in the executive branch could be
undermined by the improper use of the
APPA as an antitrust oversight
provision.’’) (citation omitted). A court
can make its public interest
determination based on the competitive
impact statement and response to public
comments alone. Apple, 889 F. Supp. 2d
at 633; U.S. Airways, 38 F. Supp. 3d at
75.
Collier T. Kelley
Meagan K. Bellshaw
Michael G. McLellan
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust
Division, 450 5th St. NW, Suite 4000,
Washington, DC 20530, Telephone: (202)
445–9737, Email: Collier.Kelley@usdoj.gov.
[FR Doc. 2024–18240 Filed 8–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request;
Respiratory Protection Program at
Coal Mines
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting this Mine Safety
and Health Administration (MSHA)sponsored information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are
invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that the agency
receives on or before September 16,
2024.
SUMMARY:
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Howell by telephone at 202–
693–6782, or by email at DOL_PRA_
PUBLIC@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of this information collection is
to collect four types of information from
coal mine operators: revised standard
operating procedures (SOPs), American
Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) recordkeeping, fit test records,
and emergency respirator inspection
records. The mine operator uses the
VIII. Determinative Documents
information to properly issue
There are no determinative materials
respiratory protection to coal miners
or documents within the meaning of the
who need to use personal protective
APPA that were considered by the
equipment where accepted engineering
United States in formulating the
controls measures have not been
proposed Final Judgment.
developed or when necessary, by the
Dated: August 9, 2024
nature of work involved (for example,
Respectfully submitted,
while establishing controls or
llllllllllllllllllll occasional entry into hazardous
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 158 / Thursday, August 15, 2024 / Notices
atmospheres to perform maintenance or
investigation). Fit-testing records are
used to ensure that a respirator worn by
an individual is the same brand, model,
and size respirator that was worn when
that individual successfully passed a fittest. Records of emergency respirator
inspection are used to ensure that
respirators are in proper working order
when needed.
MSHA uses the information to
determine compliance with the standard
specified in 30 CFR 72.710. For
additional substantive information
about this ICR, see the related notice
published in the Federal Register on
May 1, 2024 (89 FR 35250).
Comments are invited on: (1) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimates of the burden and
cost of the collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information collection; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
This information collection is subject
to the PRA. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless the OMB
approves it and displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number. In addition,
notwithstanding any other provisions of
law, no person shall generally be subject
to penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information that does not
display a valid OMB Control Number.
See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
Agency: DOL–MSHA.
Title of Collection: Respiratory
Protection Program at Coal Mines.
OMB Control Number: 1219–0NEW.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits.
Number of Respondents: 1,106.
Frequency: Annual.
Number of Responses: 19,908.
Annual Burden Hours: 11,060 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $0.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D)).
Michael Howell,
Senior Paperwork Reduction Act Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2024–18182 Filed 8–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Aug 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
[OMB Control No. 1219–0096]
Proposed Extension of Information
Collection; Underground Retorts
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, conducts a pre-clearance
request for comment to provide the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed collections of information, in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This request
helps to ensure that: requested data can
be provided in the desired format;
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized; collection
instruments are clearly understood; and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
The Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is soliciting
comments on the information collection
entitled Underground Retorts.
DATES: All comments must be received
on or before October 15, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the
information collection requirements of
this notice may be sent by any of the
methods listed below. Please note that
late comments received after the
deadline will not be considered.
• Federal E-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments for docket number MSHA–
2024–0013.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: DOL–MSHA,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances, 201 12th Street South, 4th
Floor West, Arlington, VA 22202–5452.
Before visiting MSHA in person, call
202–693–9455 to make an appointment,
in keeping with the Department of
Labor’s COVID–19 policy. Special
health precautions may be required.
• MSHA will post all comments as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted and marked as
confidential, in the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
S.
Aromie Noe, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
MSHA, at
MSHA.information.collections@dol.gov
(email); (202) 693–9440 (voice); or (202)
693–9441 (facsimile). These are not tollfree numbers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66453
I. Background
Section 103(h) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, as
amended (Mine Act), 30 U.S.C. 813(h),
authorizes the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) to collect
information necessary to carry out its
duty in protecting the safety and health
of miners. Further, section 101(a) of the
Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. 811(a), authorizes
the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) to
develop, promulgate, and revise as may
be appropriate, improved mandatory
health or safety standards for the
protection of life and prevention of
injuries in coal, metal, and nonmetal
mines.
In order to fulfill the statutory
mandates to promote miners’ health and
safety, MSHA requires the collection of
information entitled Underground
Retorts. The information collection
addressed by this notice is intended to
ensure that combustible gases at
underground oil shale mines are kept at
acceptable levels and do not expose
miners to explosive or other hazardous
conditions.
Title 30 CFR 57.22401 sets forth safety
requirements for using a retort to extract
oil from shale in underground metal and
nonmetal I–A and I–B mines (mines that
operate in a combustible ore and either
liberate methane or have the potential to
liberate methane based on the history of
the mine or the geological area in which
the mine is located). Prior to ignition of
underground retorts, mine operators
must submit a written ignition operation
plan to the MSHA District Manager for
the area where the mine is located. The
ignition operation plan must contain
site-specific safeguards and safety
procedures for the underground areas of
the mine which are affected by the
retorts. The required contents listed in
30 CFR 57.22401(b) include:
(1) Acceptable levels of combustible
gases and oxygen in retort off-gases
during start-up and during burning;
levels at which corrective action will be
initiated; levels at which personnel will
be removed from the retort areas, from
the mine, and from endangered surface
areas; and the conditions for reentering
the mine;
(2) Specifications and locations of offgas monitoring procedures and
equipment;
(3) Specifications for construction of
retort bulkheads and seals, and their
locations;
(4) Procedures for ignition of a retort
and for reignition following a shutdown;
and
(5) Details of area monitoring and
alarm systems for hazardous gases and
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 158 (Thursday, August 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66452-66453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18182]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Respiratory Protection Program at Coal Mines
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL) is submitting this Mine Safety
and Health Administration (MSHA)-sponsored information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all written comments that the agency
receives on or before September 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Howell by telephone at 202-
693-6782, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this information collection
is to collect four types of information from coal mine operators:
revised standard operating procedures (SOPs), American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) recordkeeping, fit test records, and
emergency respirator inspection records. The mine operator uses the
information to properly issue respiratory protection to coal miners who
need to use personal protective equipment where accepted engineering
controls measures have not been developed or when necessary, by the
nature of work involved (for example, while establishing controls or
occasional entry into hazardous
[[Page 66453]]
atmospheres to perform maintenance or investigation). Fit-testing
records are used to ensure that a respirator worn by an individual is
the same brand, model, and size respirator that was worn when that
individual successfully passed a fit-test. Records of emergency
respirator inspection are used to ensure that respirators are in proper
working order when needed.
MSHA uses the information to determine compliance with the standard
specified in 30 CFR 72.710. For additional substantive information
about this ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal
Register on May 1, 2024 (89 FR 35250).
Comments are invited on: (1) whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency
generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and
the public is generally not required to respond to an information
collection, unless the OMB approves it and displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions
of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid
OMB Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
Agency: DOL-MSHA.
Title of Collection: Respiratory Protection Program at Coal Mines.
OMB Control Number: 1219-0NEW.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits.
Number of Respondents: 1,106.
Frequency: Annual.
Number of Responses: 19,908.
Annual Burden Hours: 11,060 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $0.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D)).
Michael Howell,
Senior Paperwork Reduction Act Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2024-18182 Filed 8-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P