Certain NAND Memory Devices and Electronic Devices Containing Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation, 65931-65932 [2024-18021]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Notices
The eight objects of cultural
patrimony are bone and antler tools that
were removed from 35–TI–104, an
archaeological site on Bayocean
Peninsula in Tillamook County, OR in
1970 by Ron Kent, a PSU master’s
student in the Anthropology
Department. These cultural items were
inadvertently excavated from deposits
of faunal remains, and subsequently
identified as objects of cultural
patrimony during NAGPRA Summary
consultations in 2022.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Determinations
Portland State University has
determined that:
• The 63 sacred objects described in
this notice are specific ceremonial
objects needed by a traditional Native
American religious leader for presentday adherents to practice traditional
Native American religion, according to
the Native American traditional
knowledge of a lineal descendant,
Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian
organization.
• The eight objects of cultural
patrimony described in this notice have
ongoing historical, traditional, or
cultural importance central to the
Native American group, including any
constituent sub-group (such as a band,
clan, lineage, ceremonial society, or
other subdivision), according to the
Native American traditional knowledge
of an Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization.
• There is a reasonable connection
between the cultural items described in
this notice and the Confederated Tribes
of Siletz Indians of Oregon;
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde
Community of Oregon; and the
Confederated Tribes of the Warm
Springs Reservation of Oregon.
Requests for Repatriation
Additional, written requests for
repatriation of the cultural items in this
notice must be sent to the authorized
representative identified in this notice
under ADDRESSES. Requests for
repatriation may be submitted by any
lineal descendant, Indian Tribe, or
Native Hawaiian organization not
identified in this notice who shows, by
a preponderance of the evidence, that
the requestor is a lineal descendant or
a culturally affiliated Indian Tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization.
Repatriation of the cultural items in
this notice to a requestor may occur on
or after September 12, 2024. If
competing requests for repatriation are
received, Portland State University must
determine the most appropriate
requestor prior to repatriation. Requests
for joint repatriation of the cultural
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
items are considered a single request
and not competing requests. Portland
State University is responsible for
sending a copy of this notice to the
Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian
organizations identified in this notice
and to any other consulting parties.
Authority: Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act, 25
U.S.C. 3004 and the implementing
regulations, 43 CFR 10.9.
Dated: August 1, 2024.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2024–17976 Filed 8–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1412]
Certain NAND Memory Devices and
Electronic Devices Containing Same;
Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on July
8, 2024, under section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of
MimirIP LLC of Dallas, Texas. A
supplement to the Complaint was filed
on July 26, 2024. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain NAND memory devices and
electronic devices containing same by
reason of the infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,637,919
(‘‘the ’919 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
9,245,962 (‘‘the ’962 patent’’); and U.S.
Patent No. 10,896,918 (‘‘the ’918
patent’’). The complaint, as
supplemented, further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute. The complainant requests that
the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the
investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024).
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
SUMMARY:
65931
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
August 7, 2024, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
4, 5, 7, 10, 11, and 13 of the ’919 patent;
claims 1–7, 11–16, 20, and 22 of the
’962 patent; and claims 1–3, 7, 8, 10,
and 13–15 of the ’918 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘NAND memory; and
smart devices, augmented and virtual
reality products, gaming devices,
computers, laptops, desktops,
workstations, tablets, servers, SSDs,
USB and flash drives, portable storage
devices, and memory cards containing
the same’’;
(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(l), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties or other
interested persons with respect to the
public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
65932
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. l337(d)(l), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(4) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: MimirIP LLC,
9330 LBJ Freeway, Suite 900, Dallas, TX
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Micron Technology Inc., 6360 South
Federal Way, Post Office Box 6, Boise
ID 83716
Acer Inc., 8F., No. 88, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th
Rd., Xizhi Dist., New Taipei City 221,
Taiwan
Acer America Corp., 1730 North First
Street, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95112
HP, Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo
Alto, CA 94304
Kingston Technology Company, Inc.,
17600 Newhope Street, Fountain
Valley, CA 92708
Lenovo Group Limited, 23rd Floor,
Lincoln House, Taikoo Place, 979
King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong,
S.A.R. of China
Lenovo (United States) Inc., 8001
Development Drive, Morrisville, NC
27560
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Aug 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 8, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–18021 Filed 8–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–593–596 and
731–TA–1401–1406 (Review)]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From
Canada, China, Greece, India, South
Korea, and Turkey; Scheduling of Full
Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of full reviews
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty and
countervailing duty orders on large
diameter welded pipe from Canada,
China, Greece, India, South Korea, and
Turkey would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. The Commission has determined
to exercise its authority to extend the
review period by up to 90 days.
DATES: November 4, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lawrence Jones (202) 205–3358), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background.—On May 6, 2024, the
Commission determined that responses
to its notice of institution of the subject
five-year reviews were such that full
reviews should proceed (89 FR 46160,
May 28, 2024); accordingly, full reviews
are being scheduled pursuant to section
751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements are available from the Office
of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s website.
Participation in these reviews and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in this review as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
file an additional notice of appearance.
The Secretary will maintain a public
service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the
review.
For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Please note the Secretary’s Office will
accept only electronic filings during this
time. Filings must be made through the
Commission’s Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS, https://
edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any
electronic filings will be accepted until
further notice.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in these reviews, provided that
the application is made by 45 days after
publication of this notice. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the review. A party
granted access to BPI following
publication of the Commission’s notice
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65931-65932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18021]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1412]
Certain NAND Memory Devices and Electronic Devices Containing
Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 8, 2024, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of MimirIP LLC of
Dallas, Texas. A supplement to the Complaint was filed on July 26,
2024. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain NAND memory devices and electronic devices containing same by
reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
8,637,919 (``the '919 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,245,962 (``the '962
patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 10,896,918 (``the '918 patent''). The
complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The
complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease
and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on August 7, 2024, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, and 13 of the '919 patent; claims 1-7, 11-
16, 20, and 22 of the '962 patent; and claims 1-3, 7, 8, 10, and 13-15
of the '918 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``NAND memory; and
smart devices, augmented and virtual reality products, gaming devices,
computers, laptops, desktops, workstations, tablets, servers, SSDs, USB
and flash drives, portable storage devices, and memory cards containing
the same'';
(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(l), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
[[Page 65932]]
issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors
set forth in 19 U.S.C. l337(d)(l), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: MimirIP LLC, 9330 LBJ Freeway, Suite 900,
Dallas, TX
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Micron Technology Inc., 6360 South Federal Way, Post Office Box 6,
Boise ID 83716
Acer Inc., 8F., No. 88, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Rd., Xizhi Dist., New Taipei
City 221, Taiwan
Acer America Corp., 1730 North First Street, Suite 400, San Jose, CA
95112
HP, Inc., 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
Kingston Technology Company, Inc., 17600 Newhope Street, Fountain
Valley, CA 92708
Lenovo Group Limited, 23rd Floor, Lincoln House, Taikoo Place, 979
King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, S.A.R. of China
Lenovo (United States) Inc., 8001 Development Drive, Morrisville, NC
27560
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor
is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 8, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-18021 Filed 8-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P