Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fees Schedule, 61511-61514 [2024-16794]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 / Notices
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can determine whether or
not to connect to the Exchange based on
the value received compared to the cost
of doing so. Indeed, market participants
have numerous alternative exchanges
that they may participate on and direct
their order flow, as well as off-exchange
venues, where competitive products are
available for trading.
Nothing in the proposal burdens
intra-market competition because the
Ultra High Density Cabinets, cabinet
power options, and PDU optionality in
NY11–4 are available to any customer
under the same fees as any other
customer, and any customer that wishes
to order cabinets, power and PDUs in
NY11–4 can do so on a nondiscriminatory basis.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.20 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–ISE–2024–30. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–ISE–2024–30 and should be
submitted on or before August 21, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–16802 Filed 7–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
ISE–2024–30 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100587; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2024–068]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fees Schedule
July 25, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 9,
2024, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) proposes to
amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/BZX/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
20 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Jul 30, 2024
21 17
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61511
2 17
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
31JYN1
61512
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule.3
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
17 options venues to which market
participants may direct their order flow.
Based on publicly available information,
no single options exchange has more
than 13% of the market share.4 Thus, in
such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single options
exchange, including the Exchange,
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of option order flow. The
Exchange believes that the ever-shifting
market share among the exchanges from
month to month demonstrates that
market participants can shift order flow
or discontinue to reduce use of certain
categories of products, in response to fee
changes. Accordingly, competitive
forces constrain the Exchange’s
transaction fees, and market participants
can readily trade on competing venues
if they deem pricing levels at those
other venues to be more favorable. In
response to competitive pricing, the
Exchange, like other options exchanges,
offers rebates and assesses fees for
certain order types executed on or
routed through the Exchange.
The Exchange’s fee schedule sets forth
standard rebates and rates applied per
contract. For example, the Exchange
provides a rebate of $0.25 per contract
for Firm,5 Broker Dealer 6 and Joint Back
Office 7 (‘‘Firm/BD/JBO’’) orders that
add liquidity in Penny Securities,
yielding fee code PF. Additionally, in
response to the competitive
environment, the Exchange also offers
tiered pricing, which provides Members
opportunities to qualify for higher
rebates or reduced fees where certain
volume criteria and thresholds are met.8
Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for
higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts
for satisfying increasingly more
stringent criteria.
First, the Exchange proposes to
increase the standard rebate for Firm/
BD/JBO orders (i.e., yield fee code PF)
that add liquidity in Penny Securities,
from $0.25 to $0.26.9
Second, the Exchange proposes to
update the Firm, Broker Dealer, and
Joint Back Office Penny Add Volume
Tiers (i.e., applicable to orders yielding
fee code PF) set forth in Footnote 2. The
Exchange currently provides
opportunities for rebates per contract to
add liquidity in Penny Securities as
follows:
Tier
Rebate per contract to add
Required criteria
Tier 1 ...............................................
($0.38) ...........................................
Tier 2 ...............................................
($0.46) ...........................................
Member has an ADAV * in Firm/BD/JBO orders ≥0.20% of average
OCV.**
(1) Member has an ADAV in Away MM/Firm/BD/JBO orders ≥1.05%
of average OCV; and
(2) Member has an ADV *** ≥1.95% of average OCV.
* ‘‘ADAV’’ means average daily added volume calculated as the number of contracts added.
** ‘‘OCC Customer Volume’’ or ‘‘OCV’’ means the total equity and ETF options volume that clears in the Customer range at the Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) for the month for which the fees apply, excluding volume on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange System Disruption and on any day with a scheduled early market close.
*** ‘‘ADV’’ means average daily volume calculated as the number of contracts added or removed, combined, per day.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Exchange proposes to amend
these tiers as follows:
• modify Tier 1 to require the
Member to have an ADAV in Firm/BD/
JBO orders greater than or equal to
15,000 contracts and an ADAV in
Customer orders greater than or equal to
0.20% of average OCV, to qualify for the
rebate; and
• modify Tier 2 to reduce the rebate
from $0.46 to $0.42 per contract 10 and
require the Member to have an ADAV in
Firm/BD/JBO orders greater than or
equal to 30,000 contracts and an ADAV
in Customer orders greater than or equal
to 0.20% of average OCV, to qualify for
the rebate.
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee
changes on July 1, 2024 (SR–CboeBZX–2024–063).
On July 9, 2024, the Exchange withdrew that filing
and submitted this proposal.
4 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market
Volume Summary by Month (June 27, 2024),
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/
market_statistics/.
5 ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any order for the proprietary
account of an OCC clearing member.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Jul 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.11 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 12 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 13 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,14 which
requires that Exchange rules provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
6 ‘‘Broker Dealer’’ applies to any order for the
account of a broker dealer, including a foreign
broker dealer.
7 ‘‘Joint Back Office’’ applies to any order for a
joint back office account.
8 As part of the proposed rule change, the
Exchange proposes a clarifying change to remove
the duplicative reference to a rebate of $0.39 for fee
code PM in the Standard Rates table.
9 In connection with the proposed fee changes,
the Exchange also proposes to update the
corresponding listed rebate of $0.25 for fee codes
PF in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees table to
the proposed new rebate of $0.26.
10 In connection with the proposed fee changes,
the Exchange also proposes to update the
corresponding listed rebate of $0.46 for fee codes
PF in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees table to
the proposed new rebate of $0.42.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
13 Id.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
dues, fees, and other charges among its
Members and other persons using its
facilities.
As described above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. The
proposed rule change reflects a
competitive pricing structure designed
to incentivize market participants to
direct their order flow to the Exchange,
which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of
all Members. Additionally, competing
exchanges offer similar tiered pricing
structures, including schedules of
rebates and fees that apply based upon
similarly situated members achieving
certain volume and/or growth
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees
or rebates for similar types of orders, to
that of the Exchange.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change to increase the standard
rebate for Firm/BD/JBO orders that add
liquidity in Penny Securities is
reasonable because it is a modest
increase in this rebate rate for these
orders and it continues to be in line
with the standard rebate for orders of
other market participants that remove
liquidity in Penny Securities on the
Exchange.15 Additionally, the proposed
rebate is in line with rebates for similar
transactions at other exchanges.16 The
Exchange believes the proposed change
is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members and, as
previously noted, the increased rebate is
in line with the standard rebate for
orders submitted for other market
participants that add liquidity in Penny
Securities on the Exchange.
The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to the Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add
Volume Tiers are reasonable because
they continue to provide opportunities
for Members to receive higher rebates by
providing for incrementally increasing
volume-based criteria they can reach
for. The Exchange believes the tiers, as
modified, continue to serve as a
reasonable means to encourage
15 As set forth in the Fees Schedule, the standard
rebate for orders that add liquidity in Penny
Securities is between $0.25 and $0.29 for
Professional, Customer, Market Maker, and Away
MM orders.
16 See, e.g., MIAX Emerald Options Exchange Fee
Schedule, Transaction Fees, which provides that
Firm Proprietary and Broker Dealer orders that add
liquidity are provided a rebate of $0.25 per contract
in Penny Classes. See also MEMX Options Fee
Schedule, which provides Firms and Broker Dealers
that add liquidity are provided a rebate of $0.45 per
contract in Penny Securities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Jul 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
Members to increase their liquidity on
the Exchange, particularly in connection
with additional Firm/BD/JBO order flow
to the Exchange in order to benefit from
the proposed enhanced rebates.
The Exchange believes the proposed
criteria remain commensurate with the
corresponding enhanced rebates,
including as amended for Tier 2. The
Exchange believes the revised criteria
will continue to encourage Members to
send additional Firm/BD/JBO orders to
the Exchange. Greater remove volume
order flow may increase transactions on
the Exchange, which the Exchange
believes incentivizes liquidity providers
to submit additional liquidity and
execution opportunities. An overall
increase in activity deepens the
Exchange’s liquidity pool, offers
additional cost savings, supports the
quality of price discovery, promotes
market transparency and improves
market quality for all investors.
Further, the Exchange believes the
proposed reduced rebate offered under
revised Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add
Volume Tier 2 is reasonable because
Members are still eligible to receive a
rebate for meeting the corresponding
criteria, albeit at a lower amount then
before. While Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add
Volume Tier 2, as proposed, will
provide a lower rebate than that
currently offered (from $0.46 to $0.42),
the Exchange still believes that the
changes are reasonable as the tier, even
as amended, will continue to
incentivize Members to send additional
Firm/BD/JBO orders to the Exchange. As
noted above, an overall increase in add
activity may provide for deeper, more
liquid markets and execution
opportunities at improved prices, which
ultimately offers additional cost savings,
supports the quality of price discovery,
promotes market transparency and
improves market quality for all
investors. Moreover, the Exchange is not
required to maintain these tiers nor
provide rebates. The Exchange believes
the proposed changes to the rebates
offered under these tiers still remain
commensurate with the corresponding
criteria under the respective tiers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
change is also equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to all Members, who will
have the opportunity to meet the tiers’
criteria and receive the corresponding
enhanced rebate for each tier if such
criteria is met. Without having a view of
activity on other markets and offexchange venues, the Exchange has no
way of knowing whether these proposed
changes would definitely result in any
Members qualifying for the proposed
rebates. While the Exchange has no way
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61513
of predicting with certainty how the
proposed changes will impact Member
activity, based on trading activity from
the prior months, the Exchange
anticipates that up to two Members will
achieve Tier 1 and up to two Members
will achieve Tier 2. Additionally, all
Members are able to increase their Firm/
BD/JBO order flow to attempt to achieve
these tiers. Should a Member not meet
the proposed new criteria, the Member
will merely not receive that
corresponding enhanced rebate.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the Exchange believes the proposal to
increase the standard rebate for Firm/
BD/JBO orders that add liquidity in
Penny Securities will not impose any
burden on intramarket competition
because it will apply uniformly to all
Members. All Members that submit
orders yielding fee code PF will receive
this same rebate. The Exchange believes
the proposal to amend the Firm/BD/JBO
Penny Add Volume Tiers will also not
impose any burden on intramarket
competition, as the changes will also
apply to all Members. All Members will
continue to have an opportunity to
receive rebates under various tiers in the
program. The Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add
Volume Tiers are generally designed to
increase the competitiveness of BZX
and incentivize participants to increase
their order flow on the Exchange,
providing for additional execution
opportunities for market participants
and improved price transparency. An
overall increase in add activity may
provide for deeper, more liquid markets
and execution opportunities at
improved prices. Furthermore, greater
overall order flow, trading
opportunities, and pricing transparency
benefit all market participants on the
Exchange by enhancing market quality
and continuing to encourage Members
to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced
market ecosystem.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed changes represent a
significant departure from pricing
currently offered by the Exchange.
Members may opt to disfavor the
Exchange’s pricing if they believe that
alternatives offer them better value.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not
believe that the proposed changes will
impair the ability of Members or
competing venues to maintain their
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
61514
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative
venues that they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including 16
other options exchanges and offexchange venues. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage
of the overall market. Based on publicly
available information, no single options
exchange has more than 13% of the
market share.17 Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of option order flow.
Indeed, participants can readily choose
to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem
fee levels at those other venues to be
more favorable. Moreover, the
Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the
securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 18 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’ . . . .’’.19 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
17 See
supra note 4.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
19 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
18 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Jul 30, 2024
Jkt 262001
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 20 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 21 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeBZX–2024–068 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeBZX–2024–068. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
PO 00000
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeBZX–2024–068 and should be
submitted on or before August 21, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.22
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–16794 Filed 7–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100594; File No. SR–
FINRA–2024–004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Partial
Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule
Change To Amend FINRA Rule 6730 To
Reduce the 15-Minute TRACE
Reporting Timeframe to One Minute
July 25, 2024.
I. Introduction
On January 11, 2024, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change (SR–FINRA–2024–004) to
amend FINRA Rule 6730 to reduce the
15-minute reporting timeframe for
transactions reported to FINRA’s Trade
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
20 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
1 15
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61511-61514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-16794]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100587; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2024-068]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fees Schedule
July 25, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 9, 2024, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to
amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/BZX/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[[Page 61512]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee changes on
July 1, 2024 (SR-CboeBZX-2024-063). On July 9, 2024, the Exchange
withdrew that filing and submitted this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 17 options venues to which market participants
may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available information,
no single options exchange has more than 13% of the market share.\4\
Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no
single options exchange, including the Exchange, possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of option order flow. The Exchange
believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from
month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order
flow or discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of products, in
response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the
Exchange's transaction fees, and market participants can readily trade
on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. In response to competitive pricing, the Exchange,
like other options exchanges, offers rebates and assesses fees for
certain order types executed on or routed through the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Volume Summary
by Month (June 27, 2024), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's fee schedule sets forth standard rebates and rates
applied per contract. For example, the Exchange provides a rebate of
$0.25 per contract for Firm,\5\ Broker Dealer \6\ and Joint Back Office
\7\ (``Firm/BD/JBO'') orders that add liquidity in Penny Securities,
yielding fee code PF. Additionally, in response to the competitive
environment, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing, which provides
Members opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees
where certain volume criteria and thresholds are met.\8\ Tiered pricing
provides an incremental incentive for Members to strive for higher tier
levels, which provides increasingly higher benefits or discounts for
satisfying increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``Firm'' applies to any order for the proprietary account of
an OCC clearing member.
\6\ ``Broker Dealer'' applies to any order for the account of a
broker dealer, including a foreign broker dealer.
\7\ ``Joint Back Office'' applies to any order for a joint back
office account.
\8\ As part of the proposed rule change, the Exchange proposes a
clarifying change to remove the duplicative reference to a rebate of
$0.39 for fee code PM in the Standard Rates table.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the Exchange proposes to increase the standard rebate for
Firm/BD/JBO orders (i.e., yield fee code PF) that add liquidity in
Penny Securities, from $0.25 to $0.26.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In connection with the proposed fee changes, the Exchange
also proposes to update the corresponding listed rebate of $0.25 for
fee codes PF in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees table to the
proposed new rebate of $0.26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange proposes to update the Firm, Broker Dealer,
and Joint Back Office Penny Add Volume Tiers (i.e., applicable to
orders yielding fee code PF) set forth in Footnote 2. The Exchange
currently provides opportunities for rebates per contract to add
liquidity in Penny Securities as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rebate per
Tier contract to add Required criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1........................ ($0.38).......... Member has an ADAV *
in Firm/BD/JBO
orders >=0.20% of
average OCV.**
Tier 2........................ ($0.46).......... (1) Member has an
ADAV in Away MM/Firm/
BD/JBO orders
>=1.05% of average
OCV; and
(2) Member has an ADV
*** >=1.95% of
average OCV.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the number of
contracts added.
** ``OCC Customer Volume'' or ``OCV'' means the total equity and ETF
options volume that clears in the Customer range at the Options
Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') for the month for which the fees apply,
excluding volume on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange
System Disruption and on any day with a scheduled early market close.
*** ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number of
contracts added or removed, combined, per day.
The Exchange proposes to amend these tiers as follows:
modify Tier 1 to require the Member to have an ADAV in
Firm/BD/JBO orders greater than or equal to 15,000 contracts and an
ADAV in Customer orders greater than or equal to 0.20% of average OCV,
to qualify for the rebate; and
modify Tier 2 to reduce the rebate from $0.46 to $0.42 per
contract \10\ and require the Member to have an ADAV in Firm/BD/JBO
orders greater than or equal to 30,000 contracts and an ADAV in
Customer orders greater than or equal to 0.20% of average OCV, to
qualify for the rebate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In connection with the proposed fee changes, the Exchange
also proposes to update the corresponding listed rebate of $0.46 for
fee codes PF in the Fee Codes and Associated Fees table to the
proposed new rebate of $0.42.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\11\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \12\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\14\ which
requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable
[[Page 61513]]
dues, fees, and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\13\ Id.
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The proposed rule change
reflects a competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market
participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which the
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all
Members. Additionally, competing exchanges offer similar tiered pricing
structures, including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based
upon similarly situated members achieving certain volume and/or growth
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees or rebates for similar types
of orders, to that of the Exchange.
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change to increase the
standard rebate for Firm/BD/JBO orders that add liquidity in Penny
Securities is reasonable because it is a modest increase in this rebate
rate for these orders and it continues to be in line with the standard
rebate for orders of other market participants that remove liquidity in
Penny Securities on the Exchange.\15\ Additionally, the proposed rebate
is in line with rebates for similar transactions at other
exchanges.\16\ The Exchange believes the proposed change is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all
Members and, as previously noted, the increased rebate is in line with
the standard rebate for orders submitted for other market participants
that add liquidity in Penny Securities on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As set forth in the Fees Schedule, the standard rebate for
orders that add liquidity in Penny Securities is between $0.25 and
$0.29 for Professional, Customer, Market Maker, and Away MM orders.
\16\ See, e.g., MIAX Emerald Options Exchange Fee Schedule,
Transaction Fees, which provides that Firm Proprietary and Broker
Dealer orders that add liquidity are provided a rebate of $0.25 per
contract in Penny Classes. See also MEMX Options Fee Schedule, which
provides Firms and Broker Dealers that add liquidity are provided a
rebate of $0.45 per contract in Penny Securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the Firm/BD/JBO Penny
Add Volume Tiers are reasonable because they continue to provide
opportunities for Members to receive higher rebates by providing for
incrementally increasing volume-based criteria they can reach for. The
Exchange believes the tiers, as modified, continue to serve as a
reasonable means to encourage Members to increase their liquidity on
the Exchange, particularly in connection with additional Firm/BD/JBO
order flow to the Exchange in order to benefit from the proposed
enhanced rebates.
The Exchange believes the proposed criteria remain commensurate
with the corresponding enhanced rebates, including as amended for Tier
2. The Exchange believes the revised criteria will continue to
encourage Members to send additional Firm/BD/JBO orders to the
Exchange. Greater remove volume order flow may increase transactions on
the Exchange, which the Exchange believes incentivizes liquidity
providers to submit additional liquidity and execution opportunities.
An overall increase in activity deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool,
offers additional cost savings, supports the quality of price
discovery, promotes market transparency and improves market quality for
all investors.
Further, the Exchange believes the proposed reduced rebate offered
under revised Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add Volume Tier 2 is reasonable because
Members are still eligible to receive a rebate for meeting the
corresponding criteria, albeit at a lower amount then before. While
Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add Volume Tier 2, as proposed, will provide a lower
rebate than that currently offered (from $0.46 to $0.42), the Exchange
still believes that the changes are reasonable as the tier, even as
amended, will continue to incentivize Members to send additional Firm/
BD/JBO orders to the Exchange. As noted above, an overall increase in
add activity may provide for deeper, more liquid markets and execution
opportunities at improved prices, which ultimately offers additional
cost savings, supports the quality of price discovery, promotes market
transparency and improves market quality for all investors. Moreover,
the Exchange is not required to maintain these tiers nor provide
rebates. The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the rebates
offered under these tiers still remain commensurate with the
corresponding criteria under the respective tiers.
The Exchange believes the proposed change is also equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all Members,
who will have the opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and receive
the corresponding enhanced rebate for each tier if such criteria is
met. Without having a view of activity on other markets and off-
exchange venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether these
proposed changes would definitely result in any Members qualifying for
the proposed rebates. While the Exchange has no way of predicting with
certainty how the proposed changes will impact Member activity, based
on trading activity from the prior months, the Exchange anticipates
that up to two Members will achieve Tier 1 and up to two Members will
achieve Tier 2. Additionally, all Members are able to increase their
Firm/BD/JBO order flow to attempt to achieve these tiers. Should a
Member not meet the proposed new criteria, the Member will merely not
receive that corresponding enhanced rebate.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the Exchange
believes the proposal to increase the standard rebate for Firm/BD/JBO
orders that add liquidity in Penny Securities will not impose any
burden on intramarket competition because it will apply uniformly to
all Members. All Members that submit orders yielding fee code PF will
receive this same rebate. The Exchange believes the proposal to amend
the Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add Volume Tiers will also not impose any burden
on intramarket competition, as the changes will also apply to all
Members. All Members will continue to have an opportunity to receive
rebates under various tiers in the program. The Firm/BD/JBO Penny Add
Volume Tiers are generally designed to increase the competitiveness of
BZX and incentivize participants to increase their order flow on the
Exchange, providing for additional execution opportunities for market
participants and improved price transparency. An overall increase in
add activity may provide for deeper, more liquid markets and execution
opportunities at improved prices. Furthermore, greater overall order
flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefit all
market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes represent a
significant departure from pricing currently offered by the Exchange.
Members may opt to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if they believe that
alternatives offer them better value. Accordingly, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed changes will impair the ability of
Members or competing venues to maintain their
[[Page 61514]]
competitive standing in the financial markets.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including 16 other options exchanges and
off-exchange venues. Additionally, the Exchange represents a small
percentage of the overall market. Based on publicly available
information, no single options exchange has more than 13% of the market
share.\17\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power
in the execution of option order flow. Indeed, participants can readily
choose to send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues
if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable.
Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \18\ The fact
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the
courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C.
Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for
order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S.
national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the
broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide
range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no
exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted'
because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker dealers' . . . .''.\19\
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change
imposes any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See supra note 4.
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\19\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \20\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \21\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-068 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-068. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-068 and should be submitted
on or before August 21, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-16794 Filed 7-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P