Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Strike Interval for Options on SPDR® Gold Shares, 58447-58450 [2024-15770]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2024 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–15767 Filed 7–17–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100521; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2024–064]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Strike Interval for Options on SPDR®
Gold Shares
July 12, 2024.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) proposes to
amend the strike interval for options on
SPDR® Gold Shares (‘‘GLD’’). The text of
the proposed rule change is provided
below.
(additions are italicized; deletions are
[bracketed])
*
*
*
*
*
Rules of Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
*
*
*
*
Rule 19.6. Series of Options Contracts
Open for Trading
*
*
*
*
*
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(4) The interval between strike prices of
series of options on Fund Shares approved
for options trading pursuant to Rule 19.3(i)
shall be fixed at a price per share which is
reasonably close to the price per share at
which the underlying security is traded in
the primary market at or about the same time
such series of options is first open for trading
on BZX Options, or at such intervals as may
have been established on another options
exchange prior to the initiation of trading on
BZX Options. Notwithstanding any other
provision regarding the interval between
strike prices of series of options on Fund
Shares in this Rule, the interval between
strike prices of series of options on Standard
& Poor’s Depository Receipts Trust (‘‘SPY’’),
iShares S&P 500 Index ETF (‘‘IVV’’), [and
]the DIAMONDS Trust (‘‘DIA’’), and SPDR®
Gold Shares (‘‘GLD’’) will be $1 or greater.
*
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 2,
2024, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
*
(d) The interval between strike prices
of series of options on individual stocks
will be:
*
*
*
*
*
16:47 Jul 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
*
*
*
*
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 19.6, ‘‘Series of Options Contracts
Open for Trading.’’ Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to amend Rule
19.6(d)(4) to allow for the interval
between strike prices of series of options
on Fund Shares of SPDR® Gold Shares
or ‘‘GLD’’ to be $1 or greater, including
where the strike price is greater than
$200.
Currently Rule 19.6, Interpretation
and Policy .01 provides, in relevant
part, that for series of options on
Exchange-Traded Fund Shares that
satisfy the criteria set forth in Rule
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58447
19.3(i), the interval of strike prices may
be $1 or greater where the strike price
is $200 or less or $5 or greater where the
strike price is over $200, subject to
certain exceptions set forth in Rule 19.3
[sic], Interpretations and Policies .02
and .03.
Further, current Rule 19.6(d)(4)
provides that notwithstanding any other
provision regarding the interval between
strike prices of series of options on
Fund Shares in Rule 19.6, the interval
between strike prices of series of options
on Standard & Poor’s Depository
Receipts Trust (‘‘SPY’’), iShares S&P 500
Index ETF (‘‘IVV’’), and the DIAMONDS
Trust (‘‘DIA’’) will be $1 or greater. At
this time, the Exchange proposes to
modify the interval setting regime to be
$1 or greater for GLD options, similar to
SPY, IVV, and DIA. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change
would make GLD options easier for
investors and traders to use and more
tailored to their investment needs. GLD
is an Exchange-Traded Fund Share
designed to closely track the price and
performance of the price of gold bullion.
GLD is widely quoted as an indicator of
gold stock prices and is a significant
indicator of overall economic health.
Investors use GLD to diversify their
portfolios and benefit from market
trends. Additionally, GLD is a leading
product in its asset class that trades
within a ‘‘complex’’ where, in addition
to the underlying security, there are
multiple instruments available for
hedging such as, COMEX Gold Futures;
Gold Daily Futures; iShares GOLD
Trust; SPDR GOLD Minishares Trust;
Aberdeen Physical Gold Trust; and
GraniteShares Gold Shares.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
offering a wider base of GLD options
affords traders and investors important
hedging and trading opportunities,
particularly in the midst of current price
trends. The Exchange believes that not
having the proposed $1 strike price
intervals above $200 in GLD
significantly constricts investors’
hedging and trading possibilities. The
Exchange therefore believes that by
having smaller strike intervals in GLD,
investors would have more efficient
hedging and trading opportunities due
to the lower $1 interval ascension. The
proposed $1 interval above the $200
strike price, will result in having at-themoney series based upon the underlying
ETF moving less than 1%. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
strike setting regime is in line with the
slower movements of broad-based
indices. Considering the fact that $1
intervals already exist below the $200
price point and that GLD have
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
58448
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2024 / Notices
consistently inclined in price toward
the $200 level, the Exchange believes
that continuing to maintain the current
$200 level (above which intervals
increase 500% to $5), may have a
negative effect on investing, trading and
hedging opportunities, and volume. The
Exchange believes that the investing,
trading, and hedging opportunities
available with GLD options far
outweighs any potential negative impact
of allowing GLD options to trade in
more finely tailored intervals above the
$200 price point. The proposed strike
setting regime would permit strikes to
be set to more closely reflect the
increasing value in the underlying and
allows investors and traders to roll open
positions from a lower strike to a higher
strike in conjunction with the price
movements of the underlying ETF.
Under the current rule, where the next
higher available series would be $5
away above a $200 strike price, the
ability to roll such positions would be
impaired. Accordingly, to move a
position from a $200 strike to a $205
strike under the current rule, an investor
would need for the underlying product
to move 2.5%, and would not be able to
execute a roll up until such a large
movement occurred. The Exchange
believes that with the proposed rule
change, the investor would be in a
significantly safer position of being able
to roll his open options position from a
$200 to a $201 strike price, which is
only a 0.5% move for the underlying. As
a result, the proposed rule change will
allow the Exchange to better respond to
customer demand for GLD strike price
more precisely aligned with the smaller,
longer-term incremental increases in the
underlying ETF. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change, like the
other strike price programs currently
offered by the Exchange, will benefit
investors by providing investors the
flexibility to more closely tailor their
investment and hedging decisions using
GLD options. Moreover, by allowing
series of GLD options to be listed in $1
intervals between strike prices over
$200, the proposal will moderately
augment the potential total number of
options series available on the
Exchange. However, the Exchange
believes it and the Options Price
Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) have the
necessary systems capacity to handle
any potential additional traffic
associated with this proposed rule
change. The Exchange also believes that
Members will not have a capacity issue
due to the proposed rule change. In
addition, the Exchange represents that it
does not believe that this expansion will
cause fragmentation of liquidity, but
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
rather, believes that finer strike intervals
will serve to increase liquidity available
as well as price efficiency by providing
more trading opportunities for all
market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.5 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 6 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 7 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,8 which
provides that the Exchange be organized
and have the capacity to be able to carry
out the purposes of the Act and to
enforce compliance by the Exchange’s
Members and persons associated with
its Members with the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the Exchange.
In particular, the proposed rule
change will allow investors to more
easily use GLD options. Moreover, the
proposed rule change would allow
investors to better trade and hedge
positions in GLD options where the
strike price is greater than $200, and
ensure that investors in both options are
not at a disadvantage simply because of
the strike price. The Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act, which
provides that the Exchange be organized
and have the capacity to be able to carry
out the purposes of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder, and
the rules of the Exchange. The proposal
PO 00000
5 15
6 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
7 Id.
8 15
Fmt 4703
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100447
(June 28, 2024) (SR–ISE–2024–17).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
Frm 00122
allows the Exchange to respond to
customer demand to allow GLD options
to trade in $1 intervals above a $200
strike price. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule would
create additional capacity issues or
affect market functionality. As noted
above, ETF options trade in wider $5
intervals above a $200 strike price,
whereby options at or below a $200
strike price trade in $1 intervals. This
creates a situation where contracts on
the same option class effectively may
not be able to execute certain strategies
such as, for example, rolling to a higher
strike price, simply because of the $200
strike price above which options
intervals increase by 500%. This
proposal remedies the situation by
establishing an exception to the current
ETF interval regime for GLD options to
allow such options to trade in $1 or
greater intervals at all strike prices.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change, like other strike
price programs currently offered by the
Exchange, will benefit investors by
giving them increased flexibility to more
closely tailor their investment and
hedging decisions. By way of example,
GLD is a leading product in its asset
class and it trades within a ‘‘complex’’
where, in addition to the underlying
security, there are multiple instruments
available for hedging such as, COMEX
Gold Futures; Gold Daily Futures;
iShares GOLD Trust; SPDR GOLD
Minishares Trust; Aberdeen Physical
Gold Trust; and GraniteShares Gold
Shares.
With regard to the impact of this
proposal on system capacity, the
Exchange believes it and OPRA have the
necessary systems capacity to handle
any potential additional traffic
associated with this proposed rule
change. The Exchange believes that its
Members will not have a capacity issue
as a result of this proposal. Further, the
Exchange does not believe the proposal
does not unfairly discriminate among
market participants, as all market
participants will be treated in the same
manner under this proposal.
Finally, the Exchange notes the
proposed rule change is substantively
the same as a rule change proposed by
Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) which the
Commission recently approved.9
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2024 / Notices
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change will result in additional
investment options and opportunities to
achieve the investment and trading
objectives of market participants seeking
efficient trading and hedging vehicles,
to the benefit of investors, market
participants, and the marketplace in
general. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that GLD options investors and
traders will significantly benefit from
the availability of finer strike price
intervals above a $200 price point. In
addition, the interval setting regime the
Exchange proposes to apply to GLD
options is currently applied to SPY,
IVV, and DIA options, which are
similarly popular and widely traded
ETF products and track indexes at
similarly high price levels. Thus, the
proposed strike setting regime for GLD
options will allow options on this an
actively traded ETF with index levels at
corresponding price levels to trade
pursuant to the same strike setting
regime. This will permit investors to
employ similar investment and hedging
strategies for each of these options.
The Exchange does not believe the
proposal will impose any burden on
inter-market competition, as nothing
prevents other options exchanges from
proposing similar rules to make a finer
strike price intervals above a $200 price
point available for GLD options. The
Exchange notes that the proposed rule
change is not a novel proposal, as the
Commission recently approved a
substantively identical proposal of
another exchange.10 Further, the
Exchange does not believe the proposal
will impose any burden on intramarket
competition, as all market participants
will be treated in the same manner
under this proposal.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 11 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.12 Because the
foregoing proposed rule change does
not: (i) significantly affect the protection
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
100447 (June 28, 2024) (SR–ISE–2024–17).
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
of investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 13 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.14
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 15 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),16 the
Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. The Exchange has requested
that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. According to the Exchange, the
proposed rule change is a competitive
response to a filing submitted by ISE
that was recently approved by the
Commission.17 The Exchange has stated
that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay would allow the Exchange to
implement the proposal at the same
time as its competitor exchange, thus
creating competition among GLD
options. The Commission believes that
the proposed rule change presents no
novel issues and that waiver of the 30day operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the
proposed rule change as operative upon
filing.18
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
17 See supra note 9.
18 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
13 15
14 17
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58449
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeBZX–2024–064 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeBZX–2024–064. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeBZX–2024–064 and should be
submitted on or before August 8, 2024.
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
58450
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 138 / Thursday, July 18, 2024 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–15770 Filed 7–17–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100523; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2024–019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change to Rules 5605, 5615 and 5810
To Clarify and Modify Phase-In
Schedules for Certain Corporate
Governance Requirements and Clarify
Applicability of Certain Cure Periods
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
July 12, 2024.
On May 8, 2024, The Nasdaq Stock
Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to Exchange Rules 5605, 5615
and 5810 to clarify and modify phasein schedules for certain corporate
governance requirements and clarify the
applicability of certain cure periods.
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on May 29, 2024.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposed rule change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that within 45 days of the publication of
notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the Notice for this
proposed rule change is July 13, 2024.
The Commission is extending this 45day time period.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12), (59).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100208
(May 22, 2024), 89 FR 46528 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,5
designates August 27, 2024, as the date
by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–NASDAQ–2024–019).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–15772 Filed 7–17–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100516; File No. SR–
GEMX–2024–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend its Fees for
Connectivity and Co-Location Services
July 12, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 27,
2024, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s fees for connectivity and colocation services, as described further
below.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/gemx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 17, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
5 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
6 17
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend the Exchange’s fees
relating to connectivity and co-location
services.3 Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to raise its fees for
connectivity and co-location services in
General 8 as well as certain fees related
to its Testing Facilities in Options 7,
Section 6 by 5.5%, with certain
exceptions.
General 8, Section 1 includes the
Exchange’s fees that relate to
connectivity, including fees for cabinets,
external telco/inter-cabinet connectivity
fees, fees for connectivity to the
Exchange, fees for connectivity to third
party services, fees for market data
connectivity, fees for cabinet power
install, and fees for additional charges
and services. General 8, Section 2
includes the Exchange’s fees for direct
connectivity services, including fees for
direct circuit connection to the
Exchange, fees for direct circuit
connection to third party services, and
fees for point of presence connectivity.
With the exception of the Exchange’s
GPS Antenna fees and the Cabinet
Proximity Option Fee for cabinets with
power density >10kW,4 the Exchange
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed
pricing change on March 1, 2024 (SR–GEMX–2024–
05). On April 29, 2024, the Exchange withdrew that
filing and submitted SR–GEMX–2024–09. The
instant filing replaces SR–GEMX–2024–09, which
was withdrawn on June 27, 2024.
4 The Exchange proposes to exclude the GPS
Antenna fees from the proposed fee increase
because, unlike the other fees in General 8, the
Exchange recently increased its GPS Antenna fees.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–99129
(December 11, 2023), 88 FR 87017 (December 15,
2023) (SR–GEMX–2023–17). The Exchange also
proposes to exclude the Cabinet Proximity Option
Fee for cabinets with power density >10kW from
the proposed fee increase because the Exchange
recently established such fee. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 34–100210 (May 22,
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 138 (Thursday, July 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58447-58450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15770]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100521; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2024-064]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Strike Interval for Options on SPDR[supreg] Gold Shares
July 12, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 2, 2024, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to
amend the strike interval for options on SPDR[supreg] Gold Shares
(``GLD''). The text of the proposed rule change is provided below.
(additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed])
* * * * *
Rules of Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
* * * * *
Rule 19.6. Series of Options Contracts Open for Trading
* * * * *
(d) The interval between strike prices of series of options on
individual stocks will be:
* * * * *
(4) The interval between strike prices of series of options on
Fund Shares approved for options trading pursuant to Rule 19.3(i)
shall be fixed at a price per share which is reasonably close to the
price per share at which the underlying security is traded in the
primary market at or about the same time such series of options is
first open for trading on BZX Options, or at such intervals as may
have been established on another options exchange prior to the
initiation of trading on BZX Options. Notwithstanding any other
provision regarding the interval between strike prices of series of
options on Fund Shares in this Rule, the interval between strike
prices of series of options on Standard & Poor's Depository Receipts
Trust (``SPY''), iShares S&P 500 Index ETF (``IVV''), [and ]the
DIAMONDS Trust (``DIA''), and SPDR[supreg] Gold Shares (``GLD'')
will be $1 or greater.
* * * * *
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 19.6, ``Series of Options
Contracts Open for Trading.'' Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 19.6(d)(4) to allow for the interval between strike prices
of series of options on Fund Shares of SPDR[supreg] Gold Shares or
``GLD'' to be $1 or greater, including where the strike price is
greater than $200.
Currently Rule 19.6, Interpretation and Policy .01 provides, in
relevant part, that for series of options on Exchange-Traded Fund
Shares that satisfy the criteria set forth in Rule 19.3(i), the
interval of strike prices may be $1 or greater where the strike price
is $200 or less or $5 or greater where the strike price is over $200,
subject to certain exceptions set forth in Rule 19.3 [sic],
Interpretations and Policies .02 and .03.
Further, current Rule 19.6(d)(4) provides that notwithstanding any
other provision regarding the interval between strike prices of series
of options on Fund Shares in Rule 19.6, the interval between strike
prices of series of options on Standard & Poor's Depository Receipts
Trust (``SPY''), iShares S&P 500 Index ETF (``IVV''), and the DIAMONDS
Trust (``DIA'') will be $1 or greater. At this time, the Exchange
proposes to modify the interval setting regime to be $1 or greater for
GLD options, similar to SPY, IVV, and DIA. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change would make GLD options easier for investors
and traders to use and more tailored to their investment needs. GLD is
an Exchange-Traded Fund Share designed to closely track the price and
performance of the price of gold bullion. GLD is widely quoted as an
indicator of gold stock prices and is a significant indicator of
overall economic health. Investors use GLD to diversify their
portfolios and benefit from market trends. Additionally, GLD is a
leading product in its asset class that trades within a ``complex''
where, in addition to the underlying security, there are multiple
instruments available for hedging such as, COMEX Gold Futures; Gold
Daily Futures; iShares GOLD Trust; SPDR GOLD Minishares Trust; Aberdeen
Physical Gold Trust; and GraniteShares Gold Shares. Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that offering a wider base of GLD options affords
traders and investors important hedging and trading opportunities,
particularly in the midst of current price trends. The Exchange
believes that not having the proposed $1 strike price intervals above
$200 in GLD significantly constricts investors' hedging and trading
possibilities. The Exchange therefore believes that by having smaller
strike intervals in GLD, investors would have more efficient hedging
and trading opportunities due to the lower $1 interval ascension. The
proposed $1 interval above the $200 strike price, will result in having
at-the-money series based upon the underlying ETF moving less than 1%.
The Exchange believes that the proposed strike setting regime is in
line with the slower movements of broad-based indices. Considering the
fact that $1 intervals already exist below the $200 price point and
that GLD have
[[Page 58448]]
consistently inclined in price toward the $200 level, the Exchange
believes that continuing to maintain the current $200 level (above
which intervals increase 500% to $5), may have a negative effect on
investing, trading and hedging opportunities, and volume. The Exchange
believes that the investing, trading, and hedging opportunities
available with GLD options far outweighs any potential negative impact
of allowing GLD options to trade in more finely tailored intervals
above the $200 price point. The proposed strike setting regime would
permit strikes to be set to more closely reflect the increasing value
in the underlying and allows investors and traders to roll open
positions from a lower strike to a higher strike in conjunction with
the price movements of the underlying ETF. Under the current rule,
where the next higher available series would be $5 away above a $200
strike price, the ability to roll such positions would be impaired.
Accordingly, to move a position from a $200 strike to a $205 strike
under the current rule, an investor would need for the underlying
product to move 2.5%, and would not be able to execute a roll up until
such a large movement occurred. The Exchange believes that with the
proposed rule change, the investor would be in a significantly safer
position of being able to roll his open options position from a $200 to
a $201 strike price, which is only a 0.5% move for the underlying. As a
result, the proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to better
respond to customer demand for GLD strike price more precisely aligned
with the smaller, longer-term incremental increases in the underlying
ETF. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, like the
other strike price programs currently offered by the Exchange, will
benefit investors by providing investors the flexibility to more
closely tailor their investment and hedging decisions using GLD
options. Moreover, by allowing series of GLD options to be listed in $1
intervals between strike prices over $200, the proposal will moderately
augment the potential total number of options series available on the
Exchange. However, the Exchange believes it and the Options Price
Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary systems capacity to
handle any potential additional traffic associated with this proposed
rule change. The Exchange also believes that Members will not have a
capacity issue due to the proposed rule change. In addition, the
Exchange represents that it does not believe that this expansion will
cause fragmentation of liquidity, but rather, believes that finer
strike intervals will serve to increase liquidity available as well as
price efficiency by providing more trading opportunities for all market
participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \6\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\8\ which provides
that the Exchange be organized and have the capacity to be able to
carry out the purposes of the Act and to enforce compliance by the
Exchange's Members and persons associated with its Members with the
Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\7\ Id.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the proposed rule change will allow investors to
more easily use GLD options. Moreover, the proposed rule change would
allow investors to better trade and hedge positions in GLD options
where the strike price is greater than $200, and ensure that investors
in both options are not at a disadvantage simply because of the strike
price. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act, which provides that the Exchange be
organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange. The proposal allows the Exchange to respond to customer
demand to allow GLD options to trade in $1 intervals above a $200
strike price. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule
would create additional capacity issues or affect market functionality.
As noted above, ETF options trade in wider $5 intervals above a $200
strike price, whereby options at or below a $200 strike price trade in
$1 intervals. This creates a situation where contracts on the same
option class effectively may not be able to execute certain strategies
such as, for example, rolling to a higher strike price, simply because
of the $200 strike price above which options intervals increase by
500%. This proposal remedies the situation by establishing an exception
to the current ETF interval regime for GLD options to allow such
options to trade in $1 or greater intervals at all strike prices.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, like other
strike price programs currently offered by the Exchange, will benefit
investors by giving them increased flexibility to more closely tailor
their investment and hedging decisions. By way of example, GLD is a
leading product in its asset class and it trades within a ``complex''
where, in addition to the underlying security, there are multiple
instruments available for hedging such as, COMEX Gold Futures; Gold
Daily Futures; iShares GOLD Trust; SPDR GOLD Minishares Trust; Aberdeen
Physical Gold Trust; and GraniteShares Gold Shares.
With regard to the impact of this proposal on system capacity, the
Exchange believes it and OPRA have the necessary systems capacity to
handle any potential additional traffic associated with this proposed
rule change. The Exchange believes that its Members will not have a
capacity issue as a result of this proposal. Further, the Exchange does
not believe the proposal does not unfairly discriminate among market
participants, as all market participants will be treated in the same
manner under this proposal.
Finally, the Exchange notes the proposed rule change is
substantively the same as a rule change proposed by Nasdaq ISE, LLC
(``ISE'') which the Commission recently approved.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100447 (June 28,
2024) (SR-ISE-2024-17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance
[[Page 58449]]
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will result in additional investment options and
opportunities to achieve the investment and trading objectives of
market participants seeking efficient trading and hedging vehicles, to
the benefit of investors, market participants, and the marketplace in
general. Specifically, the Exchange believes that GLD options investors
and traders will significantly benefit from the availability of finer
strike price intervals above a $200 price point. In addition, the
interval setting regime the Exchange proposes to apply to GLD options
is currently applied to SPY, IVV, and DIA options, which are similarly
popular and widely traded ETF products and track indexes at similarly
high price levels. Thus, the proposed strike setting regime for GLD
options will allow options on this an actively traded ETF with index
levels at corresponding price levels to trade pursuant to the same
strike setting regime. This will permit investors to employ similar
investment and hedging strategies for each of these options.
The Exchange does not believe the proposal will impose any burden
on inter-market competition, as nothing prevents other options
exchanges from proposing similar rules to make a finer strike price
intervals above a $200 price point available for GLD options. The
Exchange notes that the proposed rule change is not a novel proposal,
as the Commission recently approved a substantively identical proposal
of another exchange.\10\ Further, the Exchange does not believe the
proposal will impose any burden on intramarket competition, as all
market participants will be treated in the same manner under this
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100447 (June 28,
2024) (SR-ISE-2024-17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \13\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of
Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \15\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\16\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has
requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. According to
the Exchange, the proposed rule change is a competitive response to a
filing submitted by ISE that was recently approved by the
Commission.\17\ The Exchange has stated that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay would allow the Exchange to implement the proposal at
the same time as its competitor exchange, thus creating competition
among GLD options. The Commission believes that the proposed rule
change presents no novel issues and that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay
and designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\17\ See supra note 9.
\18\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-064 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-064. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-064 and should
be submitted on or before August 8, 2024.
[[Page 58450]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12), (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-15770 Filed 7-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P