Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, 57950-57951 [2024-15504]
Download as PDF
57950
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2024 / Notices
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
Records in this system that have been
compiled in reasonable anticipation of a
civil action or proceeding are exempt
from individual access as permitted by
5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5). The USPS has also
claimed exemption from certain
provisions of the Act for several of its
other systems of records at 39 CFR
266.9. To the extent that copies of
exempted records from those other
systems are incorporated into this
system, the exemptions applicable to
the original primary system continue to
apply to the incorporated records.
HISTORY:
August 18, 2021, 86 FR 46281;
February 25, 2019, 84 FR 6022; January
26, 2018, 83 FR 3777; July 19, 2013, 78
FR 43247; February 22, 2013, 78 FR
12368; June 17, 2011, 76 FR 35483;
April 29, 2005, 70 FR 22516.
*
*
*
*
*
Sarah Sullivan,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–15623 Filed 7–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
POSTAL SERVICE
International Product Change—Priority
Mail Express International, Priority Mail
International & First-Class Package
International Service Agreement
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Postal ServiceTM.
Notice.
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a Priority
Mail Express International, Priority Mail
International & First-Class Package
International Service contract to the list
of Negotiated Service Agreements in the
Competitive Product List in the Mail
Classification Schedule.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Date of notice: July 16, 2024.
Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268–
7820.
The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 9, 2024, it
filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a USPS Request to Add
Priority Mail Express International,
Priority Mail International & First-Class
Package International Service Contract
40 to Competitive Product List.
Documents are available at
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jul 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
Christopher Doyle,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–15539 Filed 7–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100490; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–43]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
American Options Fee Schedule
July 10, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on July 1,
2024, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE American Options Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) regarding the
American Customer Engagement
(‘‘ACE’’) Program. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change
effective July 1, 2024. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024–417
and CP2024–424.
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
PO 00000
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify
Section I.E. of the Fee Schedule
regarding the ACE Program.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
clarify the operation of the Program as
relates to Customer volume executed via
the BOLD Mechanism (‘‘BOLD volume’’)
and to make other minor technical
changes as described herein.4 This
proposal would not alter how the ACE
Program operates (or the credits applied
on eligible BOLD volume) and is instead
designed to clarify a potential ambiguity
in the Fee Schedule.
The ACE Programs, as described in
Section I.E., offers Order Flow Providers
(OFP) 5 per contract credits based on,
and applied to, certain Electronic
Customer volume executed on the
Exchange.6 The ACE Program has five
tiers and offers increasing per contract
credits to an OFP that meets or exceeds
increasing volume thresholds.
Regarding BOLD volume, Section I.E.
provides that ‘‘[t]he per contract credits
in the table below apply to Electronic
options transactions, including those
executed via the BOLD Mechanism’’
and that such volume ‘‘will be included
in an OFP’s Electronic volume
calculation for purposes of the ACE
Program.’’[sic]7
Section I.M. of the Fee Schedule
describes the fees and credits applied to
BOLD volume.8 Specifically, the
Exchange offers per contract credits on
each ‘‘BOLD Initiating Order’’ executed
on behalf of Customers that are the
‘‘[b]etter of ($0.12) or, if eligible for a
higher credit via the ACE Program, per
Section I.E., ($0.13).’’ 9 Thus, although
not specified in Section I.E., an OFP’s
potential per contract credit on eligible
BOLD volume is capped at ($0.13)
4 See Rule 994NY (describing the operation of the
Broadcast Order Liquidity Delivery (‘‘BOLD’’)
Mechanism).
5 An OFP is an Order Flow provider means ‘‘any
ATP Holder that submits, as agent, orders to the
Exchange.’’ See Rule 900.2NY.
6 See Fee Schedule, Section I.E. (American
Customer Engagement (‘‘ACE’’) Program).
7 Id.
8 See Fee Schedule, Section I.M. (BOLD
Mechanism Fees & Credits).
9 See id. A ‘‘BOLD Initiating Order’’ is ‘‘an order
submitted to be executed via the BOLD
Mechanism.’’ See Fee Schedule, KEY TERMS and
DEFINITIONS.
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2024 / Notices
regardless of what ACE Program tier an
OFP achieves.
To address this potential ambiguity,
the Exchange proposes to amend
Section I.E. as relates to BOLD volume.
First, the Exchange proposes to
reorganize current rule text to make
clear that, like volume executed via the
Customer Best Execution (‘‘CUBE’’)
Auction, Customer volume ‘‘executed
via the BOLD Mechanism’’ will be
‘‘included in an OFP’s Electronic
volume calculation for purposes of the
ACE Program tiers.’’ 10 Second, the
Exchange proposes to modify the first
sentence of Section I.E., regarding the
application of ACE Program credits, to
remove reference to BOLD volume.11
Instead, the Exchange proposes to add a
cross-reference to Section I.M., which
specifies the per contract credits
available for eligible BOLD volume.12
Finally, the Exchange proposes a
technical change to clarify that ACE
Program credits are not ‘‘payable’’ or
‘‘paid’’ to OFPs but are instead
‘‘available’’ to OFPs and are ‘‘applied’’
to an OFPs fees, if earned.13
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,14 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,15 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
change to specify the per contract credit
available on eligible BOLD volume is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the change
would add clarity, transparency, and
internal consistency, to the Fee
Schedule. Likewise, the proposed
10 See proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.E.
(American Customer Engagement (‘‘ACE’’)
Program). The Exchange proposes to make clear
that, for purposes of determining whether an OFP
qualifies for any of the ‘‘ACE Program tiers‘‘, the
Exchange includes Customer volume resulting from
CUBE Auctions and executions via the BOLD
Mechanism. See id. (emphasis added).
11 See id. (‘‘The per contract credits in the table
below apply to Electronic options transactions.’’).
12 See id. The Exchange also proposes minor
technical changes to specify that credits applicable
to certain CUBE Auction volume are ‘‘as set forth
in Section I.G.’’ (emphasis added).
13 See id. (specifying, for example, that the ACE
Program credits are ‘‘available’’ to OFPs; and
‘‘applied solely to Customer volume’’; and
‘‘applied’’ based on an OFP’s eligible Customer
volume).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jul 15, 2024
Jkt 262001
technical change would add clarity and
transparency to the Fee Schedule. Taken
together, the proposed changes would
benefit investors because such changes
should improve the accuracy and
comprehensibility of the Fee Schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
This proposal is not a competitive
change. Instead, the changes proposed
herein would add clarity, transparency,
and internal consistency to the Fee
Schedule thereby improving its
accuracy and comprehensibility to the
benefit of investors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 17
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 18 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
PO 00000
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–43 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSEAMER–2024–43. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyrightprotection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSEAMER–2024–43 and should
be submitted on or before August 6,
2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–15504 Filed 7–15–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
17 17
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57951
19 17
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57950-57951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-15504]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100490; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-43]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule
July 10, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on July 1, 2024, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE American Options Fee
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') regarding the American Customer Engagement
(``ACE'') Program. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change
effective July 1, 2024. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify Section I.E. of the Fee
Schedule regarding the ACE Program. Specifically, the Exchange proposes
to clarify the operation of the Program as relates to Customer volume
executed via the BOLD Mechanism (``BOLD volume'') and to make other
minor technical changes as described herein.\4\ This proposal would not
alter how the ACE Program operates (or the credits applied on eligible
BOLD volume) and is instead designed to clarify a potential ambiguity
in the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Rule 994NY (describing the operation of the Broadcast
Order Liquidity Delivery (``BOLD'') Mechanism).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ACE Programs, as described in Section I.E., offers Order Flow
Providers (OFP) \5\ per contract credits based on, and applied to,
certain Electronic Customer volume executed on the Exchange.\6\ The ACE
Program has five tiers and offers increasing per contract credits to an
OFP that meets or exceeds increasing volume thresholds. Regarding BOLD
volume, Section I.E. provides that ``[t]he per contract credits in the
table below apply to Electronic options transactions, including those
executed via the BOLD Mechanism'' and that such volume ``will be
included in an OFP's Electronic volume calculation for purposes of the
ACE Program.''[sic]\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ An OFP is an Order Flow provider means ``any ATP Holder that
submits, as agent, orders to the Exchange.'' See Rule 900.2NY.
\6\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.E. (American Customer Engagement
(``ACE'') Program).
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section I.M. of the Fee Schedule describes the fees and credits
applied to BOLD volume.\8\ Specifically, the Exchange offers per
contract credits on each ``BOLD Initiating Order'' executed on behalf
of Customers that are the ``[b]etter of ($0.12) or, if eligible for a
higher credit via the ACE Program, per Section I.E., ($0.13).'' \9\
Thus, although not specified in Section I.E., an OFP's potential per
contract credit on eligible BOLD volume is capped at ($0.13)
[[Page 57951]]
regardless of what ACE Program tier an OFP achieves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.M. (BOLD Mechanism Fees &
Credits).
\9\ See id. A ``BOLD Initiating Order'' is ``an order submitted
to be executed via the BOLD Mechanism.'' See Fee Schedule, KEY TERMS
and DEFINITIONS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To address this potential ambiguity, the Exchange proposes to amend
Section I.E. as relates to BOLD volume. First, the Exchange proposes to
reorganize current rule text to make clear that, like volume executed
via the Customer Best Execution (``CUBE'') Auction, Customer volume
``executed via the BOLD Mechanism'' will be ``included in an OFP's
Electronic volume calculation for purposes of the ACE Program tiers.''
\10\ Second, the Exchange proposes to modify the first sentence of
Section I.E., regarding the application of ACE Program credits, to
remove reference to BOLD volume.\11\ Instead, the Exchange proposes to
add a cross-reference to Section I.M., which specifies the per contract
credits available for eligible BOLD volume.\12\ Finally, the Exchange
proposes a technical change to clarify that ACE Program credits are not
``payable'' or ``paid'' to OFPs but are instead ``available'' to OFPs
and are ``applied'' to an OFPs fees, if earned.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.E. (American Customer
Engagement (``ACE'') Program). The Exchange proposes to make clear
that, for purposes of determining whether an OFP qualifies for any
of the ``ACE Program tiers``, the Exchange includes Customer volume
resulting from CUBE Auctions and executions via the BOLD Mechanism.
See id. (emphasis added).
\11\ See id. (``The per contract credits in the table below
apply to Electronic options transactions.'').
\12\ See id. The Exchange also proposes minor technical changes
to specify that credits applicable to certain CUBE Auction volume
are ``as set forth in Section I.G.'' (emphasis added).
\13\ See id. (specifying, for example, that the ACE Program
credits are ``available'' to OFPs; and ``applied solely to Customer
volume''; and ``applied'' based on an OFP's eligible Customer
volume).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\14\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\15\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change to specify the per
contract credit available on eligible BOLD volume is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the change would add
clarity, transparency, and internal consistency, to the Fee Schedule.
Likewise, the proposed technical change would add clarity and
transparency to the Fee Schedule. Taken together, the proposed changes
would benefit investors because such changes should improve the
accuracy and comprehensibility of the Fee Schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. This proposal is not a competitive change.
Instead, the changes proposed herein would add clarity, transparency,
and internal consistency to the Fee Schedule thereby improving its
accuracy and comprehensibility to the benefit of investors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \18\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-43 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-43. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyrightprotection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-43 and should
be submitted on or before August 6, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-15504 Filed 7-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P